Wargaming Basics - Military Symbology

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 30 ก.ค. 2024
  • I had a version of this overview of military symbology in the rules video I'm currently working on. It got too big so I broke it out into its own episode for a new Wargaming Basics series. I have a few other ideas that I'll probably make episodes for in the future.
  • เกม

ความคิดเห็น • 41

  • @paulkoble3449
    @paulkoble3449 3 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    This is a great concept for a series.

  • @richardhawes2205
    @richardhawes2205 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Thsi was absolutely fantastic - The historical imagery that you put alongside the symbols means they're now hardwired into my brain and made all those hex and counter games much more accesable to me - thanks so much

  • @DjigitDaniel
    @DjigitDaniel 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Well done, sir. It's been a while since I pored over a laminated map. LOL Nostalgia.

  • @rastamann2009
    @rastamann2009 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Interesting - I had read that the X for infantry was for a couple of crossed muskets and that the cavalry symbol was for a sabre.thanks for the video

  • @varovaro1967
    @varovaro1967 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Happy New Year to you and the intelligent people that follow u! 🍷

  • @AAQ1968
    @AAQ1968 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Simple and at the same time outstanding explanation. Thanks.

  • @MrNeverbeentoEurope
    @MrNeverbeentoEurope 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Happy New Year! I was familiar with the Nato symbol set but the history of them was much more interesting. They make more sense now. Thank you.

  • @JavaApp
    @JavaApp 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Excellent Ben. The wife and I loved it (we are both light wargamers). I can see episodes covering CRT, the different types of phased movement (like two armor movement phases, and why they are important.) Looking forward to more!

  • @greywulf31
    @greywulf31 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Great videos anticipating your Holland '44 video and hopefully more hex WWII wargames.

  • @letzteraufruf
    @letzteraufruf 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    This was super helpful! Love your work, Sir. Thank you very much & have a great new year! :-)

  • @turian1moose
    @turian1moose 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The more war games you cover the better. I love them but it's really hard for me to be motivated to read a 40 page rule book. Thank you for this

  • @decb7959
    @decb7959 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Top work Ben, looking forward to your hex and counter vids.

  • @NoEnemiesHere
    @NoEnemiesHere 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    AWESOME, Thank you!

  • @yixiyixi4057
    @yixiyixi4057 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Really great video! looking forward to next one!

  • @briandodge1834
    @briandodge1834 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video! Thanks. Happy New Year.

  • @ABCDE5628
    @ABCDE5628 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hi Ben I found this video very informational and educational. Really love it, please make new videofor this series, it's been 3 years 😆

  • @teecee5449
    @teecee5449 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video. Interesting and helpful, love it.

  • @AjaxOileo
    @AjaxOileo 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Liked the video. Have only one comment: what the videos calls “armored cavalry” is currently called “armored reconnoissance” units.

  • @bmrigs
    @bmrigs 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    .Thank you for this. I am starting to get into wargaming and this video helps a lot.

  • @coochykilla
    @coochykilla 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent video

  • @user-cj2fq2nd2f
    @user-cj2fq2nd2f 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very useful! Thank you.

  • @davidthompson7233
    @davidthompson7233 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Brilliant. Thanks so much for this. I'm super familiar with the symbols themselves, but wasn't as familiar with some of the origins. Great stuff.

  • @PatrioticGestalt
    @PatrioticGestalt 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great intro to wargaming!!! The way I see it (in terms of role playing games), each chits are character sheets for the units. Anyway, in future videos, I would love to see a compare/contrast of the usage of the chits. Lock-n-Load, ASL, GMT, etc. have different games that utilize these chits differently. The series may morph into debating which games are more "realistic". I don't mind the debate.

  • @unitedstatesofamericamilit8588
    @unitedstatesofamericamilit8588 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Excellent production!

    • @unitedstatesofamericamilit8588
      @unitedstatesofamericamilit8588 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      It is a valuable learning tool to share with future prospect/ gamers, as an intro.
      Very nice 👍

  • @timbovonnirgendwo7350
    @timbovonnirgendwo7350 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great idea! I am so long in wargaming and I did´t know the orign of the signs until now ;-)

  • @AlexNLee
    @AlexNLee 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Outstanding! Appreciate it :)

  • @cw.austin6633
    @cw.austin6633 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Back to basics, I love it!

  • @bleedingleaderq
    @bleedingleaderq ปีที่แล้ว

    Very helpful, thanks!

  • @theplasticcommando7394
    @theplasticcommando7394 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good video. I recently picked up a copy of 1967 Six Day War by Decision Games. This is helpful as the unit chips have similar designations.

  • @chrisridley4840
    @chrisridley4840 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Welcome to hex and counter Ben 😉

  • @GoodCovfefe
    @GoodCovfefe ปีที่แล้ว

    helpful. thank you.

  • @michaelg.1786
    @michaelg.1786 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    That was a a good historical reference and helpful. Now no longer Greek to me 😁

  • @guilleaeiou
    @guilleaeiou 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hey Harsh, could you do a video for Risiko!? It is an italian version of Risk, but interesting, because some rules are not the same, for example defender has three dice, reinforcements are different too, and it has the same missions as the international/american version, but also has 16 missions for tournaments so so interesnting (for me the best and more interesting part of the game). For tournaments it has a punctuation system, not very complex, but different from the international Risk (not only the number of territories), that is very interesting too. Sorry for my bad English, I'm not native speaker.

  • @ColonelRoseru
    @ColonelRoseru ปีที่แล้ว

    Footnote, NATO uses cavalry symbol for recon units these days.

  • @kodiak71gene
    @kodiak71gene 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Could you post the legend at the beginning of the video? I can’t find a reference to help me understand the complex symbols and numbers. Thank you so very much!

    • @harsh-rules
      @harsh-rules  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      You can google search for Military Symbology for a lot of examples like this one:
      www.reddit.com/r/MilitaryStrategy/comments/5mrf16/standard_military_symbols_used_for_planning/

  • @Marinealver
    @Marinealver 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    MIL-STD-2525 is your basic guide.
    Currently the version being used is MIL-STD-2525D.
    It is all unclassified you can find it on google.
    But thanks for the historic outlook on the origins of the symbiology.

  • @KingP0rkchop
    @KingP0rkchop 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    You know, if you were wanting to showcase a set of rules that simulate WW1-WW2 era naval warfare as best as possible, I’d recommend Seekrieg 5, arguably the best naval wargame of that era

    • @harsh-rules
      @harsh-rules  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Interesting. Thanks, I'll look for it!

  • @dipdip7250
    @dipdip7250 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Awesome!!!