The first time you see a jet like this with thrust vectoring fly, it literally looks like alien technology. You will stand there with your mouth open in disbelief at the way they can turn, drop, and shoot back up... it is simply breathtaking...
we've had help. I find it hard to believe we got so advanced in very short time. without help. on all kinds of things. whether little green men or a breakaway civilization. we had help. flight just over 100 years ago. we struggled with airplanes, then t look what we have now. amazing not to mention exploring the solar system. we didn't get that smart that fast. in my opinion
Well done! The only involvement I had in it’s development was paying taxes yet I still feel proud every time I see one, so I can only imagine how you must feel when you see one.
The F-22 Raptor will never fly out of any other air-force other than the United States of America for a reason, this fighter is 30 to 40 years ahead of any thing in its class. The F-35 only makes it better. You gain a whole new appreciation for the fighter when you see and hear it up close. Great video!
Beautiful aircraft. Filming really captures the grace, and fluidity of movement so much more than still photography. Well filmed. (think I saw myself during the take off, what a show it was this year) F22... surely the greatest aircraft ever created.
Yixe of cause the US delivered them to Europe already - they took part in financing it. SU-35 is more closest competitor on a market today. Turkish President studied SU-57 today in Moscow . But this is not yet ready as a manufactured raptor. Well, 4++ is also good choice , especially regarding ODK engines inside - no one knows who can beat on a battle between F22 and SU35 yet.
@@lsd8497 nobody said there stupid the f22 is just way more advanced then any russain jet out there and the fact that us just made a secret fighter that already broke multiple records is gonna be crazy
@@supercarsnaviation6148that’s the cool thing about their demo team aircraft - they’re picked out of active service randomly. When I talked to “Loco” at a show once, he mentioned “as they sit” there for a demo, you could throw bombs and missiles on them with zero reconfiguring.
this is by far and away the best quality and well shot jet video I have ever watched on TH-cam. I'll look for you this year at riat and shake your hand. that's the only camera shake you'll get that day. brilliant video!
It's while watching machines like these, that you realize the atmosphere is just a very thin liquid, and these planes maneuver through it like very fast fish.
ripmax333 the f15 (105-0) has never lost a dogfight and the f-16 has only lost one in over 40 years. This plane is so far ahead of even the 15 and 16 that we won't sell it, it's RCS is the size of your left nut and its capabilities are not on the Internet. Ya we know.
No doubt this is the greatest fighter jet in the history of human kind. It looks and performs like a champion. No other jets can beat this jet in a dog fight. F22 Raptor is the king of all fighter jets. Respect from India.
I know its not part of the demo, but I say 4:07 is a textbook Cobra. the small altitude gain at the end is much better than the altitude drop we see at the end of Flanker Cobras
When I watch the video, it gives me an illusion that I'm actually there ~ I think the camera is good enough, so I wonder what camera you use. Please let me know ~ thank you
I sat at Edwards AFB watching two of these things hoping someone get into one. Years earlier I recall watching SR-71s flying off into the wild blue yonder from RAF Mildenhall.
Fighter jets aren't supposed to let the pilot pull more than 9G's, so as long as there is a pilot in it you wont see anything more maneuverable than that
In reality it doesn't even need to use it's maneuverability because it will shoot down everything long before they even know the F-22 is there and the same goes for the F-35. Russia can build all the Su 35s they want, but they aren't even close to being able to take on a F-22 or F-35.
BS!!!! Not an Indian or Israeli In the competition to build the new fighter, and in many other advanced technology programs, two master designers who are intense professional rivals but personal friends have spearheaded the development of stealth. One is Ben R. Rich, head of the Lockheed Aeronautical Systems Company's Advanced Development Projects Group. This team, known in the trade as the Skunk Works, gave America its first jet fighter, as well as the U-2 and SR-71 spy planes, the C-130 transport, the F-104 fighter and many other famous aircraft. Mr. Rich directed the design of the F-117A, the trail-blazing stealth fighter-bomber that flew to fame in the Persian Gulf war. At the Skunk Works, named for the illicit distillery in the "L'il Abner" comic strip, Mr. Rich worked for many years under Clarence (Kelly) Johnson, one of the world's most famous airplane designers. Mr. Rich's rival, Dr. John F. Cashen, leads the Northrop design group that designed the B-2 stealth bomber, which is said to be virtually invisible to radar. The B-2, expected to cost some $660.2 million each when production begins, is by far the most expensive airplane ever designed. The two engineers, pitted against each other in the competition between Lockheed's F-22 and Northrop's F-23, came from similar academic backgrounds. Both built and flew model airplanes as boys and became fascinated with aviation, and both took advanced engineering degrees at the University of California at Los Angeles. In their later years, stealth has dominated their careers.
@@julienr8114 F-22 is not a fourth-generation fighter but a fifth-gen and would for all we know beat the Rafale in a dogfight 8-10 times out of 10. It's also meaningless to compare the two since they are built for different roles.
@@robertburns4887 I dont about you but the F-35 definitely looks like it pulls off maneuvers so much easier than the F22 you should try watching the F35 demo team
F-22 employs obviously employe anti gravity materials to achieve its phenomenal performance, that or skillful engineering and excellent piloting. As part of the overall tool chest of armaments available to the commanders, this instrument of aviation destruction is beyond incredible as cover for its other aviation brethren. Those that wear this patch are right to wear it proudly. Thumbs up for a great video! 2.8k
its officially 70,000 lbs at static sea level uninstalled test. But it can reach more than that at certain speeds due to ram air effects specially at lower altitudes. the TVC deflection is 20 degrees, they don't add up for both engines.
ya ping Sang - Seriously lol? NO! The Su 57 was never even designed to be as good as the F-22 or be nearly as advanced. But the SU 57 was a failure and the program has been cancled. First off the Su 57 wasn't a true 5th gen fighter because it wasn't very stealthy and lacked the advanced senors and avionics you would find in the the F-22 and F-35. Also the Su 57 had unreliable engines that weren't made for a 5th gen fighter. The engines that the Su 57 was suppose to have weren't available because Russia doesn't have the technology or money to produce them, just like the the stealth, sensors and avionics. Basically all the Su 57 was going to be is a very expensive 4th gen fighter. The F-35 is a much superior and capable aircraft than the Su-57 also. Russia is still several decades behind the US when it comes to fighter aircraft technology.
Notice how the guy in the high speed turn at 5:18 to 5:24 never uses his flaps at full capacity. This gets me wondering if the F22 has the potential power to turn faster or equal to the T50, but by using the thrust vectoring to pull off, as it's only can do thrust vectoring on 1 axis.
I have to agree. That is why we all buy American. Phones, Planes, military equipment, oil, lumber, booze....what doesn't America sell that we don't buy? I was going to say weed, but they sell that now too. Ooh America...please let me live in you!
And to think, this was the 2nd best aircraft in the ATF competition. This F22 Raptor looks nothing like the YF22 in the 90s. Imagine what the YF23 Black Widow II would look like today....insane.
is that paint scheme intentianla or is that because they had to redo the stalth coating from time to time? I know the coating is very expensive, i just wasn't sure if the paint scheme is some form of aerial camo
Russia uses different criteria ,large numbers over super high tech, durability & ease of maintainence along with surviving attack or accidents.Russian pilots claimed they could have a landing gear malfunction land on their bellies Jack the aircraft up repair the landing gear problem & fly off on another mission that same day !! I believe almost every Russian military aircraft is designed from the first drawings to operate on rural,grass or dirt make do airfields. The US has the C-130,C-117 & the A-10, that's it. Both Russia & China appear to be getting ready for conflict! No matter what,a significant clash is more than likely to bring the word to the brink.Pray cooler heads prevail.
Andrew Porter - Pretty much everything you said is either not true or a myth. I'm guessing you are a civilian with no military background at all. First off lets talk about your first myth, "large numbers". Russia has about 700 fighters of all types, but most of them are older models and only 74 Su 35s, which are their top of the line fighter. The US has around 14,000 plus FIGHTERS! I'm not even talking about some of the attack aircraft like the A-10. That number only includes F-22, F-35, F-15C and E models, F-16, and F-18s. So lets go to your second myth about reliability and ease of maintainence. First off US aircraft are known to be very easy to maintain even though they are much more advanced. As far as being durable, have you ever seen a Russia jet hit another aircraft and lose it's WHOLE wing and still land safely? The answer is NO! A Israeli F-15 had that happen to him and the pilot said after he landed that if he had knew that he lost his whole wing he would have ejected, but the he still had good control over the fighter and landed without any problem. Yes Russian aircraft where designed to operated on poor airfields, but that doesn't mean anything. US fighters are just as tough or tougher when they are in the air. Actually US aircraft are much more reliable because Russian engines aren't built as well. If war did break out between Russia and the US, the Russia air force would not try to engage the US air force or Navy because they would be destroyed. In reality, you could take all the air forces in the world and they still wouldn't fair very well against US air power. Not only are US pilots trained better, they have more flight hrs and a lot more combat experense as a whole. The US would have air superiority where ever they went. The US is several decades ahead of Russia and China when it comes to fighter technology.
Television;-British. Telephone;-British. Jet engine;-British. The all flying tail;-British. Angle deck aircraft carrier;-British. Steam catapult;-British. Yadayada ad infinitum. The only thing America is good at is nicking our ideas!
@@mississippirebel1409 "The US is several decades ahead of Russia and China when it comes to fighter technology." тогда почему вы так боитесь россии и китая? )))
I think the Image quality it must be with 1" Inch sensor , The stabiliizer will be also better with 5 Axis , the zoom is 490 the Fdr AX-1 is 600 mm , but 490 mm is more than enough . But the main key for good stable footage is a very good tripod and a lot of Practice . Camera settings : Shutter speed 2x the frame rate so 50fps :1/100 shutter . AE -0.75 ( less light always better becuase with plane filming you go from left to right or from direct sunlight to normal position ) . AF off always put it on infinity or set your camera sharp on an object 500m away . AF "on" only for planes who are close ( Taxiing) ."auto Iris" make that the iris stays between f 4 and f6 that is the best setting for crisp sharp images . Gain always zero in normal light and gain auto in dark places with a max of 15 db otherwise to much video noise ( with the panasonic this will be no issue because of the 1 inch sensor ) Whitbalance : put on 5600 till 5700 Kelvin otherwise with auto white balance "on"the camera wants to make the blue sky ( when there is a blue sky )white and that is not ok . Also put the detail setting a little higher than factory settings because a lot of cameras are set to soft . I have also a Panasonic HC x2000 but the manual focus setting is not so good when I use full zoom . You put it sharp on an object and a few pans later it is not sharp any more . the AF on is ok but with planes far away it is constant changing sharp unsharp . Even when the plane is sharp and it passes a cloud the camera wants to make clouds sharp . This last is always the case using Auto focus with every kind of camera , verify on you tube. Also when using a tipod i never use the intelligent Stabilizer IOS because for fast passing planes it doesn't know what to do . I put the optical stabilzer "on" and set it on Pan/tilt . With this settings using a tripod the stabilizer is one of the best .
You were very detailed my friend! Thank you very much for the information, I have found a panasonic x20 at a good price if it is good and I don't need to go to a sony, will I be fine? now is your opinion?@@marcs_best_airshow_videos
I have also a SONY PXW-Z 190 and if i compare with My Sony FDR ax-1 I prefer the AX-1 because the stabilzer of the PXW-Z is not so good as the AX-1 . Image quality is practical the same but the AUTO ND Filter is such an advantage that you are always at the right Iris of 5.4 so the image is always perfect . I think give me the stabilizer of the panasonic compared with the auto ND filter of the Sony & The 1 Inch of the Panasonic and you've got the perfect camera . I don't know the panasonic X20 because I never used one , but What i Found on Yout tube it must be a good Choice because for Aviation footage the stabilizer is the key factor .
Notice right at 5:18 through 5:24, how the F22 pilot only uses rear flaps for a brief moment, including thrust vectoring in play here and how that makes the plane change angles in flight in after burn much faster, even for a short amount of time. It's my opinion that the F22 may just have some edge of Rafales and the T50 in certain ways we don't really know. Mainly, the aircraft has features that are classified, two; the plane, although lacking the maneuverability of the T50, it seems to have potential hidden power there for a stealth plane of it's type. I honestly thing the F22 may have an edge in WVR, and BVR combat, but that remains to be seen. Just note, the T50 costs almost half of the full price of the F22. There's a reason why that plane cost soo much.
That "half the price of F-22" cost of Su-57 is only an estimate in case of serial production, relying on the fact Russian arms companies make 0 profit while selling stuffs to Russian military (check Su-30SM vs Su-30MKI price comparison) and the estimate is also based on current engine price (117S?), not the newest Izd30. In small scale production it is estimated the cost would jump over $100M. Foreign customers would have to pay even more. So actually _Su-57 can be far more pricier than F-35_
No surprise from Lockheed Martin the best in fighter aircraft. Although not a TFA who can forget the legend SR-71 Blackbird. i sleep better at night time these days
The first time you see a jet like this with thrust vectoring fly, it literally looks like alien technology. You will stand there with your mouth open in disbelief at the way they can turn, drop, and shoot back up... it is simply breathtaking...
20 years on and it still look futuristic... People behind that Jet probably came from the future 👍👍👌👌👌
we've had help. I find it hard to believe we got so advanced in very short time. without help. on all kinds of things. whether little green men or a breakaway civilization. we had help. flight just over 100 years ago. we struggled with airplanes, then t look what we have now. amazing not to mention exploring the solar system. we didn't get that smart that fast. in my opinion
just think what is being kept from us. hell may even have warp propulsion. Breakaway civilization. It's not as far fetched as it sounds ...
That would be F-16. Except it's 40+ years on.
@@333crypta bang on the money. Wait till you see next 1 rolled out it will make f35 look like a spitfire
It still looks very futuristic to me
Most beautiful fighter jet ever! That was the tightest and cleanest high-speed turn at 6:13 I have ever seen.
crazy thing is, that isn't even max performance because they are not allowed to max perform the aircraft at airshows.
Well it’s the F-22 Raptor, the best fighter jet
108-0
I was lucky enough to be a part of the structural design, of this, awesome bird!!! :)
Well done! The only involvement I had in it’s development was paying taxes yet I still feel proud every time I see one, so I can only imagine how you must feel when you see one.
Fine job!!!! No bs any envolvement is this jet is absolutely something to be very proud of.thank you.greetings from loomis california
Lol it looks amazing.
The F-22 Raptor will never fly out of any other air-force other than the United States of America for a reason, this fighter is 30 to 40 years ahead of any thing in its class. The F-35 only makes it better. You gain a whole new appreciation for the fighter when you see and hear it up close. Great video!
Thanks
This is the best air craft ever built. Just beautiful and elegant and a straight killer!
Beautiful aircraft. Filming really captures the grace, and fluidity of movement so much more than still photography. Well filmed. (think I saw myself during the take off, what a show it was this year) F22... surely the greatest aircraft ever created.
Well.... Yeah, you can’t really capture movement with a still photo......
@@all-timealien4483 ג
Own way as an invisible tiger and there is no Forbidden sign in the sky for you
This jet aswell as the SU-37 looks like they came from another planet. Astonishing aircrafts.
the SU is nowhere near the raptor, its so advanced the U.S. can't even sell it to allies.
@@yixe2253 Not really. Russians are not stupid.
Yixe of cause the US delivered them to Europe already - they took part in financing it. SU-35 is more closest competitor on a market today. Turkish President studied SU-57 today in Moscow . But this is not yet ready as a manufactured raptor. Well, 4++ is also good choice , especially regarding ODK engines inside - no one knows who can beat on a battle between F22 and SU35 yet.
@@lsd8497 nobody said there stupid the f22 is just way more advanced then any russain jet out there and the fact that us just made a secret fighter that already broke multiple records is gonna be crazy
Chineses and Russian stealth aircraft are poorly engineered replicas that are more on par with the F117 in performance.
saying this plane defies gravity is a understatement, by far my favorite plane!
can't say about it's stealth features but this was probably the smoothest maneuvering I have seen
“If looks could kill” has quite a literal ring to it with this beautiful bird!
Well, the F-22 can kill if it’s armed
@@supercarsnaviation6148that’s the cool thing about their demo team aircraft - they’re picked out of active service randomly. When I talked to “Loco” at a show once, he mentioned “as they sit” there for a demo, you could throw bombs and missiles on them with zero reconfiguring.
What a beautiful bird. From France with love.
this is by far and away the best quality and well shot jet video I have ever watched on TH-cam. I'll look for you this year at riat and shake your hand. that's the only camera shake you'll get that day. brilliant video!
It's while watching machines like these, that you realize the atmosphere is just a very thin liquid, and these planes maneuver through it like very fast fish.
Wow, I think the F22 is a gorgeous looking one! I feel like I am obsessed with everything from the 1990's :) Great footage!
The Lockheed F-22 Raptor Was introduced in 2005.
@@supercarsnaviation6148 but designed in the 90s
Man, I wish we had more of them. 187 is not enough.
Master of the skies
so they think..
ripmax333 the f15 (105-0) has never lost a dogfight and the f-16 has only lost one in over 40 years. This plane is so far ahead of even the 15 and 16 that we won't sell it, it's RCS is the size of your left nut and its capabilities are not on the Internet. Ya we know.
Ak situk Until Su-35 arrived
@@user-kz3rc1hx7e su 35 ain't shit! You know it and putin know it too!!
No doubt this is the greatest fighter jet in the history of human kind. It looks and performs like a champion. No other jets can beat this jet in a dog fight. F22 Raptor is the king of all fighter jets. Respect from India.
British typhoon better
@@StarzzyJJASD i doubt that.
But i have agree that F-23 was better looking.
I know its not part of the demo, but I say 4:07 is a textbook Cobra. the small altitude gain at the end is much better than the altitude drop we see at the end of Flanker Cobras
When I went in the Air Force we had F-4's and A-7's. I remember when we were amazed by the F-15 and F-16. The F-22 is a monster.
Nice. Now we have F-16s in a lot of bases
아름답구나 ㅎㅎ 저걸 서울 에어쇼에서 17년도에 눈앞에서 본건 엄청난 행운이엇다 ㅠ
The more and more I watch this aircraft I can't believe what it can do 💯❤️
What moves, what a shape of a machine...
Display of raw power and arial acrobatics how amazing..
When I watch the video, it gives me an illusion that I'm actually there ~ I think the camera is good enough, so I wonder what camera you use.
Please let me know ~ thank you
I film with a Sony FDR ax-1
Bravo, bravo. Big thank you to the pilot for the amazing show. That Raptor is absolutely beautiful, what an American. 🇺🇲
Thank you for great camera work tracking this bird
I sat at Edwards AFB watching two of these things hoping someone get into one.
Years earlier I recall watching SR-71s flying off into the wild blue yonder from RAF Mildenhall.
Most amazing looking , tech and performing super-fighter on earth! 😍
Es alucinante la maniobrabilidad aeronáutica del F-22 Raptor.
Jamás vi otro igual.
Excelente video. Muchas gracias desde España.
Gracias eres bienvenido
Holy Moses! Wonder what kind of max G's he was pulling In That demo!
THAT IS AN ABSOLUTELY GORGEOUS AIRCRAFT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
It is good and there is no imperfect combustion and the engine sound F-22 is very the art. It looks good^^
Awesome gentlemen thank you for uploading this! It actually felt like I was up there!
Glad you enjoyed it! thank you
Fantastic Footage!
What a nice looking aircraft - so sleek.
Lance Winslow love this video in 4K
10/10 video! 10/10 aircraft! Well done!
This thing is 30 years old and still looks futuristic
And that's only a fraction of its maneuverability. The elevators are barely adjusted for most of the demonstration.
nexus1g true.
Fighter jets aren't supposed to let the pilot pull more than 9G's, so as long as there is a pilot in it you wont see anything more maneuverable than that
In reality it doesn't even need to use it's maneuverability because it will shoot down everything long before they even know the F-22 is there and the same goes for the F-35. Russia can build all the Su 35s they want, but they aren't even close to being able to take on a F-22 or F-35.
yes because if it does any more bye bye wings.
@@ausintune9014 the plane will be fine past 9gs it's the human body that can sustain more than 9-10 for very long before passing out
Doesn’t get any better than that!!!... Amazing!!!😉 and what a beautiful machine!!!
外形扎实啊！感谢拍了4k画质
pinnacle of human engineering
I'd say the Apollo/Saturn V was the pinnacle of human engineering and ingenuity..In my opinion.
BS!!!! Not an Indian or Israeli
In the competition to build the new fighter, and in many other advanced technology programs, two master designers who are intense professional rivals but personal friends have spearheaded the development of stealth.
One is Ben R. Rich, head of the Lockheed Aeronautical Systems Company's Advanced Development Projects Group. This team, known in the trade as the Skunk Works, gave America its first jet fighter, as well as the U-2 and SR-71 spy planes, the C-130 transport, the F-104 fighter and many other famous aircraft. Mr. Rich directed the design of the F-117A, the trail-blazing stealth fighter-bomber that flew to fame in the Persian Gulf war.
At the Skunk Works, named for the illicit distillery in the "L'il Abner" comic strip, Mr. Rich worked for many years under Clarence (Kelly) Johnson, one of the world's most famous airplane designers. Mr. Rich's rival, Dr. John F. Cashen, leads the Northrop design group that designed the B-2 stealth bomber, which is said to be virtually invisible to radar. The B-2, expected to cost some $660.2 million each when production begins, is by far the most expensive airplane ever designed.
The two engineers, pitted against each other in the competition between Lockheed's F-22 and Northrop's F-23, came from similar academic backgrounds. Both built and flew model airplanes as boys and became fascinated with aviation, and both took advanced engineering degrees at the University of California at Los Angeles. In their later years, stealth has dominated their careers.
thanks Marc, the way you filmed is professional. Excellent job, subcribed.
Clouds during an airshow in the UK? Never seen that before... Great video!
F22 Raptor is the most powerful fighter ever...
not really... beautiful aircraft but for example Rafale is better and i don't think Rafale is the best fourth generation aircraft.
@@julienr8114 F-22 is not a fourth-generation fighter but a fifth-gen and would for all we know beat the Rafale in a dogfight 8-10 times out of 10. It's also meaningless to compare the two since they are built for different roles.
Awesome download, awesome Raptor. Thanks for sharing. I bust my ankle, so couldn't make it.
And at the end of the display they had Tycho playing, so perfect
The cutting edge technology . What is precise and robust.This is it!.
Wow... Beautifully-shot video. Crisp!
incredible aircraft F-22, what engineering!!!
Amazing... First flight 21 years ago. It's still the number 1 until now.
How I wish I could bring back the Wright brothers for five minutes, just to see this.
holy f*ck*ng BEAST ! The condensation on the wings during hard turns are awesome!
Awesome video and amazing visual clarity!
Thanks .greetings
Thanks for uploading this, Marc. It almost feels like I'm right there with you it's so lifelike.
Fantastic piece of engineering 👍
sick video god bless America!
Hey Marc! Are you using a tripod for this video? the stabilization is pretty good.
I film everything with a Sachtler Tripod since 2006
One of my 4 most favorite planes of the AF. This one is by far the best of the best.......
Very nice video. Sure miss seeing them fly
Great Video, Well Done, must admit I would like to record in 4K, my video will record in 4K but the computer just can't cope with editing it
What a beautiful bird 🦅
Jeremy clarkson: what a machiiiiiiine
SPPPPPPEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEDDDDDDDD
VIDEO IS JUST TOO BEAUTIFUL!
Thanks Greetings
Looks so much more solid than the F-35 Lighting
@P. Doherty I am educated and the 35 doesn't even come close on so many levels
@@robertburns4887 I dont about you but the F-35 definitely looks like it pulls off maneuvers so much easier than the F22 you should try watching the F35 demo team
@@recon_ron7746 Neither is close to the likes of F-16 or F-18 though.
F-22 employs obviously employe anti gravity materials to achieve its phenomenal performance, that or skillful engineering and excellent piloting. As part of the overall tool chest of armaments available to the commanders, this instrument of aviation destruction is beyond incredible as cover for its other aviation brethren. Those that wear this patch are right to wear it proudly. Thumbs up for a great video! 2.8k
Wow awesome flights 👍 nice video . 😎
Incredible and expensive technology indeed.
Thanks to those minds.
" Enterprise. We'll pick you up!" Hopefully in one of those!
งยงงย
Even though I know this is real, they look CGI. That's some tech, to make something look artificial. Great footage, thanks for sharing!
75000 lb of thrust. 40° vectoring. Long live the king.
its officially 70,000 lbs at static sea level uninstalled test. But it can reach more than that at certain speeds due to ram air effects specially at lower altitudes.
the TVC deflection is 20 degrees, they don't add up for both engines.
Michael D Isn’t SU-57 a better version of F-22?
ya ping Sang - Seriously lol? NO! The Su 57 was never even designed to be as good as the F-22 or be nearly as advanced. But the SU 57 was a failure and the program has been cancled. First off the Su 57 wasn't a true 5th gen fighter because it wasn't very stealthy and lacked the advanced senors and avionics you would find in the the F-22 and F-35. Also the Su 57 had unreliable engines that weren't made for a 5th gen fighter. The engines that the Su 57 was suppose to have weren't available because Russia doesn't have the technology or money to produce them, just like the the stealth, sensors and avionics.
Basically all the Su 57 was going to be is a very expensive 4th gen fighter. The F-35 is a much superior and capable aircraft than the Su-57 also. Russia is still several decades behind the US when it comes to fighter aircraft technology.
Hey Marc, love your video! What camera and microphone did you use to film this?
This video was filmed with A Sony FDR AX-1 , the microphone is the buid in of the cam .
My last video's are filmed with the Sony PXW-Z190 .
@@marcs_best_airshow_videos Thanks so much for the info Marc, love your videos! Keep up the good work!
Thank you , I will try Greetings
I love that amazing 22 raptor this is one of the best jet i have ever seen !!!!! SUPER AND BEST JET AIRWAYS
the most thrilling and exciting job in the world
4K UHD I like it so favorite!
Amazing and expensive, just like my wife
😆😆😆🤣
Hahahhhhhhh
😁😁😁
Then its worth it!
Women..
I work on this aircraft I'm still not tired of it.
WoW what a privilege .
dm me top secret shit. also do they ever actually use full afterburner in the shows? the flame looks short compared to an f16 or f15
And what your collegues talk about pakfa?
F35 is more advanced than the F22 if not as good looking.
Notice how the guy in the high speed turn at 5:18 to 5:24 never uses his flaps at full capacity. This gets me wondering if the F22 has the potential power to turn faster or equal to the T50, but by using the thrust vectoring to pull off, as it's only can do thrust vectoring on 1 axis.
The F-4's were dubbed "Smokin Joes by Airman Steven Vicars in 1980 at Luke AFB, AZ
4:55 i actually thought that was in fast forward. lord have mercy on that pilot, for the G's are absurd.
Thanks guys...Finland is on your side...
Thanks for watching , greetings
Hats off to Belle Delphine for flying the F-22 with incredible skill in the video...
She posted a TikTok of the cockpit view and she did a TikTok dance while upside down and flying at Mach 2...
her beauty is something to behold.
American figther jets are the best!
I have to agree. That is why we all buy American. Phones, Planes, military equipment, oil, lumber, booze....what doesn't America sell that we don't buy? I was going to say weed, but they sell that now too. Ooh America...please let me live in you!
Man, I can't wait to fly one.
Well, that's why the F22 Raptor lost in the red flag competition against the Rafale :) #FrenchTouch
nah russians are better
It's all about Sukhoi
Beautiful. This and the su35.
Many thanks!
На мой взгляд это самый футуристический и красивый истребитель в мире
And to think, this was the 2nd best aircraft in the ATF competition. This F22 Raptor looks nothing like the YF22 in the 90s. Imagine what the YF23 Black Widow II would look like today....insane.
looks like an alien object to me.
Maui Gold. me to lol
the F-22 made people (in theory) consider it as alien tech the days it was kept hidden
Actually the black budget stuff is in Utah
Muito biem...
This aircraft is such a pleasure to watch.
Não me canso de olhar este avião...o melhor de todos
is that paint scheme intentianla or is that because they had to redo the stalth coating from time to time? I know the coating is very expensive, i just wasn't sure if the paint scheme is some form of aerial camo
U.S is the best on all cutting edge technology so far on the earth.
not even
Russia uses different criteria ,large numbers over super high tech, durability & ease of maintainence along with surviving attack or accidents.Russian pilots claimed they could have a landing gear malfunction land on their bellies Jack the aircraft up repair the landing gear problem & fly off on another mission that same day !! I believe almost every Russian
military aircraft is designed from the first drawings to operate on rural,grass or dirt make do airfields.
The US has the C-130,C-117 & the A-10, that's it.
Both Russia & China appear to be getting ready for conflict! No matter what,a significant clash is more than likely to bring the word to the brink.Pray cooler heads prevail.
Andrew Porter - Pretty much everything you said is either not true or a myth. I'm guessing you are a civilian with no military background at all. First off lets talk about your first myth, "large numbers". Russia has about 700 fighters of all types, but most of them are older models and only 74 Su 35s, which are their top of the line fighter. The US has around 14,000 plus FIGHTERS! I'm not even talking about some of the attack aircraft like the A-10. That number only includes F-22, F-35, F-15C and E models, F-16, and F-18s. So lets go to your second myth about reliability and ease of maintainence. First off US aircraft are known to be very easy to maintain even though they are much more advanced. As far as being durable, have you ever seen a Russia jet hit another aircraft and lose it's WHOLE wing and still land safely? The answer is NO! A Israeli F-15 had that happen to him and the pilot said after he landed that if he had knew that he lost his whole wing he would have ejected, but the he still had good control over the fighter and landed without any problem. Yes Russian aircraft where designed to operated on poor airfields, but that doesn't mean anything. US fighters are just as tough or tougher when they are in the air. Actually US aircraft are much more reliable because Russian engines aren't built as well.
If war did break out between Russia and the US, the Russia air force would not try to engage the US air force or Navy because they would be destroyed. In reality, you could take all the air forces in the world and they still wouldn't fair very well against US air power. Not only are US pilots trained better, they have more flight hrs and a lot more combat experense as a whole. The US would have air superiority where ever they went. The US is several decades ahead of Russia and China when it comes to fighter technology.
Television;-British. Telephone;-British. Jet engine;-British. The all flying tail;-British. Angle deck aircraft carrier;-British. Steam catapult;-British. Yadayada ad infinitum. The only thing America is good at is nicking our ideas!
@@mississippirebel1409
"The US is several decades ahead of Russia and China when it comes to fighter technology."
тогда почему вы так боитесь россии и китая? )))
What a piece of kit!
The best looking aircraft since the SR71
Personally I think the british harrier looks better or the typhoon
very nice! what camera are you here with?
Sony fdr ax1
is the Panasonic Hc-x20 just as good?
I think the Image quality it must be with 1" Inch sensor , The stabiliizer will be also better with 5 Axis , the zoom is 490 the Fdr AX-1 is 600 mm , but 490 mm is more than enough .
But the main key for good stable footage is a very good tripod and a lot of Practice .
Camera settings : Shutter speed 2x the frame rate so 50fps :1/100 shutter . AE -0.75 ( less light always better becuase with plane filming you go from left to right or from direct sunlight to normal position ) . AF off always put it on infinity or set your camera sharp on an object 500m away .
AF "on" only for planes who are close ( Taxiing) ."auto Iris" make that the iris stays between f 4 and f6 that is the best setting for crisp sharp images . Gain always zero in normal light and gain auto in dark places with a max of 15 db otherwise to much video noise ( with the panasonic this will be no issue because of the 1 inch sensor ) Whitbalance : put on 5600 till 5700 Kelvin otherwise with auto white balance "on"the camera wants to make the blue sky ( when there is a blue sky )white and that is not ok . Also put the detail setting a little higher than factory settings because a lot of cameras are set to soft . I have also a Panasonic HC x2000 but the manual focus setting is not so good when I use full zoom . You put it sharp on an object and a few pans later it is not sharp any more . the AF on is ok but with planes far away it is constant changing sharp unsharp . Even when the plane is sharp and it passes a cloud the camera wants to make clouds sharp .
This last is always the case using Auto focus with every kind of camera , verify on you tube.
Also when using a tipod i never use the intelligent Stabilizer IOS because for fast passing planes it doesn't know what to do . I put the optical stabilzer "on" and set it on Pan/tilt . With this settings using a tripod the stabilizer is one of the best .
You were very detailed my friend! Thank you very much for the information, I have found a panasonic x20 at a good price if it is good and I don't need to go to a sony, will I be fine? now is your opinion?@@marcs_best_airshow_videos
I have also a SONY PXW-Z 190 and if i compare with My Sony FDR ax-1 I prefer the AX-1 because the stabilzer of the PXW-Z is not so good as the AX-1 . Image quality is practical the same but the AUTO ND Filter is such an advantage that you are always at the right Iris of 5.4 so the image is always perfect .
I think give me the stabilizer of the panasonic compared with the auto ND filter of the Sony & The 1 Inch of the Panasonic and you've got the perfect camera . I don't know the panasonic X20 because I never used one , but What i Found on Yout tube it must be a good Choice because for Aviation footage the stabilizer is the key factor .
Notice right at 5:18 through 5:24, how the F22 pilot only uses rear flaps for a brief moment, including thrust vectoring in play here and how that makes the plane change angles in flight in after burn much faster, even for a short amount of time. It's my opinion that the F22 may just have some edge of Rafales and the T50 in certain ways we don't really know. Mainly, the aircraft has features that are classified, two; the plane, although lacking the maneuverability of the T50, it seems to have potential hidden power there for a stealth plane of it's type. I honestly thing the F22 may have an edge in WVR, and BVR combat, but that remains to be seen. Just note, the T50 costs almost half of the full price of the F22. There's a reason why that plane cost soo much.
That "half the price of F-22" cost of Su-57 is only an estimate in case of serial production, relying on the fact Russian arms companies make 0 profit while selling stuffs to Russian military (check Su-30SM vs Su-30MKI price comparison) and the estimate is also based on current engine price (117S?), not the newest Izd30. In small scale production it is estimated the cost would jump over $100M. Foreign customers would have to pay even more. So actually _Su-57 can be far more pricier than F-35_
are you serious? it's because if he pulled more it'd be a stall.
Lockheed Martin's piece of beauty.
외계인 고문해서 만든 전투기 만든지 20년인데 아직도 최강의 전투기
SUPERB VIDEO SUPERB AIRPLANE! F-22 Best ever fighter!
thanks ,greetings
No surprise from Lockheed Martin the best in fighter aircraft. Although not a TFA who can forget the legend SR-71 Blackbird. i sleep better at night time these days
Excellent video. Great clarity. Nicely done.