SCALE FACTOR FOR RESPONSE SPECTRUM ANALYSIS

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 10 พ.ย. 2020
  • #CivilSAC
    In this video, we will learn to apply the scale factor for response spectrum analysis according to IS1893:2016 in ETABS. Applying the correct scale factor is very important to get accurate results.
    Please subscribe to my channel for more informative content.
    Link to my videos
    ASSIGNING TENSION ONLY OR COMPRESSION ONLY MEMBER ONLY IN ETABS
    • ASSIGNING TENSION ONLY...
    MODELLING OF BRICK MASONRY WALL IN ETABS ,STRUT ANALOGY, (PART -2)
    • MODELLING OF BRICK MAS...

ความคิดเห็น • 28

  • @civilengineeringconcept4863
    @civilengineeringconcept4863 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    short and simple.. nice brother liked it♥️✔🎉🎊

  • @rahitharaghu7667
    @rahitharaghu7667 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Short and simple...so helpful

    • @CivilSAC
      @CivilSAC  7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks.

  • @nakshsharma6661
    @nakshsharma6661 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Scale factor value in x direction is double in scale y direction and if mass participation period scale is more first mode what is the problem. Please suggest me

  • @gurhanatalay
    @gurhanatalay 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hello sir, Im using SAP2000 for structural analysis. In response spectrum case, stress values on shell elements are seen as 0. When I define static seismic case with the values that produces same base shear, static case gives stress on shell elements but response spectrum case still not. How can I fix that? Is there any suggestion?
    Thanks in advance.

  • @pragatidapurkar8834
    @pragatidapurkar8834 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Whats next step? After doing scalefactor

  • @rolandalphs7022
    @rolandalphs7022 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hello! Im currently studying civil engineering. Should i rescale the scale factor if the response spectrum base shear turns out to be higher? Any insights on when we should or should not?

    • @CivilSAC
      @CivilSAC  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      According to IS 1893-2016 part-1, If the design base shear from the equivalent static method is coming out to be less than the base shear from dynamic analysis, the scaling should be done as given in the code.

  • @shrinidhinavale4324
    @shrinidhinavale4324 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hello sir..
    I would like to know about the source/code book from where formula for scale factor. Ig/2R is used.

    • @CivilSAC
      @CivilSAC  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You refer to the CSI website.

  • @tasneemzidan6802
    @tasneemzidan6802 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Hello, just had a look at the CSI website and it seems that the scale factor is equal to Ig/R. Is there a reason why you divided by 2?

    • @CivilSAC
      @CivilSAC  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Ig/2R is used for IS 1893 code however Ig/R is used with ASCE 7.
      I hope this clears things up.

  • @engineerjirel4565
    @engineerjirel4565 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    what is the meaning of scaling upto base shear due to EQ? what happens when we dont scale up?

    • @CivilSAC
      @CivilSAC  3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Dynamic analysis has many uncertainties. To ensure safety if the base shear is less than the base shear from the equivalent static load method, we have to scale it up.

    • @engineerjirel4565
      @engineerjirel4565 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@CivilSAC thank u sir subscribed ur channel

  • @qureshitaqweemshakil80
    @qureshitaqweemshakil80 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    How to calculate scale factor for time history data

    • @CivilSAC
      @CivilSAC  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Please refer to this video on my channel
      th-cam.com/video/XAQt9OB2KWc/w-d-xo.html

  • @ajitkurey5225
    @ajitkurey5225 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Scale factor will be same or differ for Time history

    • @CivilSAC
      @CivilSAC  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The scale factor will be different for different time histories.

  • @narendrajadhav1224
    @narendrajadhav1224 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What is for if V2 is>V1

    • @CivilSAC
      @CivilSAC  11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      No, need to scale.

  • @pushkarchavan7437
    @pushkarchavan7437 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Initially we are taking scale factor as If/2R why??? Please tell the reason and reference..I Am taking it as 1 in spectrum case..plz help..

    • @CivilSAC
      @CivilSAC  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The response spectrum given in the IS1893 code is elastic. By using this scale factor we consider the Response reduction factor R which considers the ductility in the building. We also consider I in the scale factor. You can refer to the CSI America website for further reference.

    • @nraj2597
      @nraj2597 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@CivilSAC now its not needed in updated version of etabs for 1st time analysis factor should be (g)
      I have checked with manual calculation.
      In website that wiki page that was uploaded in 2012 and for old versions

    • @mukundkrishna5161
      @mukundkrishna5161 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@nraj2597 Are you sure sir? I am also getting some huge scale factors like 30-35 when I am doing large building designs. even I noticed that CSI website was giving the answer for old versions. So Initially should I take a scale factor of 9.8 in my analysis??Pls help.

  • @structurelearninghub3340
    @structurelearninghub3340 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Here scale factor must be 9.81

    • @CivilSAC
      @CivilSAC  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      If your unit of acceleration is m/s2, then you can use 9.81.