@@mse2130 well that and the league needed Peyton stoeybook ending. I kinda knew the score from the opening Panthers drive were this was going, too bad Kuehcely plqyed coverage and not go after Peyton. The whole game stank from the getgo
@@turbokart3776 Yeesh. In the overtime era, no team has even tied twice in a season. The Rams and 49ers came within a few seconds of tying each other twice in 2012, but that's about as close as any team has gotten.
Baltimore was about 2 yards away from winning against the Pats during their 16-0 season and also lost to Miami, that would be Miami's only win on the year. Imagine a team that wins against what would end up being a 15-1 team and loses to a 1-15 team in the same year.
It was even crazier than that. The Pats were down 4 that game with 1 chance left on 4th down. They DIDNT GET IT, and it looked like their perfect season was over, but the Ravens coach called a timeout for NO REASON that cancelled the play. The Pats would get the 4th down on their second chance and then win the game.
2001 for the Rams was one to never forget. That was the best season of the Greatest Show on Turf, and pretty much the staple of Kurt's career to that point. Too bad that an evil empire rose to prominence in that Superbowl.
Well it's obvious they're going by most recent. The Saints won the Super Bowl with a 13-3 record in the 2009 season, but this list put the 2019 Saints instead, lol. The creator of the video applied that to every team.
If it weren't for a less than steeler performance at Arrowhead, then Packers would have gone 16-0, but then again you can say that with any 15-1 team, like the Vikings.
1998 Vikings lost to the 1998 Falcons (14-2). My Vikes pick would be 1974. Best team they ever had, but ran into the Steelers a year after running into the Dolphins.
In 09 colts were 14-0 and only played their starters the first half on week 16, and only the first quarter and 1 play in the second quarter the final week. They would have most likely gone 16-0 but would have lost in the super bowl like patriots did.
I remember the Packers 2011 season well. After the game in Kansas City, I figured the Packers had the loss out of their system and could win another Super Bowl. But that was not to be as the fell to the New York Giants in the Divisional round after having a bye week in the playoffs.
Jaguars were 15-3. They beat the dolphins 62-7 in the divisional round which was also dan marinos last game. Their only 3 losses were to the titans though
@Prestin Hurshberry those teams werent in the nfl era all those teams expect the Lions, Packers and Bears are defunct. Patriots lost in the Super Bowl so the '07 Pats dont count because they didn't finsish undefeated.
Miami went 17-0 in '72 including a Divisional playoff, a Championhip game, and a SB New England went 18-1, including a Divisional, Championship, and SB loss
But is the best team the one with the best record? You could argue that the 1973 Dolphins, even with two losses including a thoroughly meaningless loss to Baltimore in week 13, was actually better. Their schedule was tougher, they were utterly dominant in the playoffs and Super Bowl (won all three games by 17+ points) and had the target on their backs the whole way. A lot of the writers and Dolphins players thought the 1973 team was better. I know this much: I watched the 1998 and 2016 Falcons, and I can say without hesitation that in a playoff game, the 2016 Falcons would have beaten the 1998 Falcons by two or three touchdowns.
@@macofalltrades6396 Out of all the comments that you choose to reply this to, you chose the one that is just the list of the records as seen in the video, which ranked these teams by there best records in a single season. If you want best season for each NFL team by their strongest roster, then search that up, or if it doesn't exist already, then make it yourself.
I realize it's regular season records, but the Dolphins should be number one as they also went undefeated in the playoffs as well, including the Super Bowl.
I think that's what happened to the 73-9 warriors too. It's difficult to win the championship with a very good record due to pressure and fatigue because you tried hard to win those regular season games.
This is a decent ranking of best NFL seasons by team... The only thing is that the 85' Chicago Bears should be ranked higher than the 15' Carolina Panthers considering that despite both had considerably even win percentages and both were in the superbowl in their respectable seasons... The deciding factor is that Although The 15' Carolina Panthers did make it to the superbowl... They lost to the Devver Broncos 10 - 24 Whereas The 85' Chicago Bears made it to the superbowl and won against the New England Patriots with a score of 46 - 10 !! So all in all... The 85' Chicago Bears season went far better than the 15' Carolina Panthers season and as such technically should have them higher ranked...
Only 4 out of the 10 teams with 1 loss or less seasons actually won it all. 76 raiders, 84 niners, 85 bears, and 72 fins. 68 colts lost the biggest upset in sb history as 18 pt favorites, 04 steelers got slapped by 04 pats(ty spygate), 98 vikings choked big time vs atlanta off a missed fg by Gary Anderson. 2011 packers lost to the giants in the divisional which i find funny. 2015 panthers folded in the spotlight and were never the same. And 2007 patriots...........lol
You missed the 1975 Steelers who went 12-2 in the regular season. They also won the Super Bowl that season. You also missed the 1978 Steelers who went 14-2 and also won the Super Bowl. There was no Indianapolis Colts in 1968; they were the Baltimore Colts. There was no Las Vegas Raiders in 1976; they were the Oakland Raiders.
when your ' teams best season ' was back ni the early 60's.....dang...thats a long time ago- meanwhile Gb's best season was just 10 years ago , and aside from the 2015 panthers 15-1 mark- the only other team with a better record is the 2007 patriots who went 16-0 but lost the SB anyway-
For everyone that is talking about the dolphins and patriots, the patriots won 16 games and dolphins only won 14. Yes, I know that the dolphins won the Super Bowl but that is the reason.
Some teams tied their own records over the years... Perhaps redo this and add the record then below the record the years they achieved it even if it was 2-3 times
Yeah. Gary Anderson missing that field goal in the NFC championship game was a shock. Especially after being perfect the whole season. Vikings playing the Broncos in that Super Bowl would’ve been a better and closer game as well.
@@Classicrocker6119 The Super Bowl game might have been closer if the Falcons' Eugene Robinson doesn't get arrested for soliciting prostitution the night before the game.
@@topns4061 exactly. The same team name and same city, with only a 3 year gap in between. The only difference between the old Browns and new Browns is ownership, which can change multiple times anyway, lol. You could technically separate them if you fixate on semantics, but honestly they're both the same franchise.
Not so much . Think about it ; Since the RS period holds up for 16 matches , the no1 seed in both divisional and - most importantly - conference board is bestowed upon teams bearing an average score of 2 to - in very extreme types of situations - 5 loses during the 16 game schedule . Thus , using simple math and of course the official standings presented in the video , it is safe to assume that the 13-3 record could be the average score in a #1 seeded team headed for the playoffs .
Nope the Dolphins should be number 1 as they were 17-0, winning the super bowl. That was the greatest single season ever. No one before or since has been able to duplicate their feet.
Notice number one. 16-0. Until they met a team with a defense. Brady laughing about how they were going to score ONLY 17 points. Plax gave your pathetic offense WAY to much credit.
Alright I need an explanation from SOMEONE. So back in 2011 when the NHL's Atlanta Thrashers moved to Winnipeg, the team was renamed to the Jets. However, *as far as I'm aware*, I don't ever hear anyone combining their history (more specifically, statistics) with the old Winnipeg Jets that are now the Arizona Coyotes. Yet I hear/see things with the Cleveland Browns that constantly make callbacks to the old Cleveland Browns that are now the Baltimore Ravens. I hear it on broadcasts, I hear it from friends, and I saw it on this channel. The old Browns moved to Baltimore in 1996. The new Browns were an expansion team founded in 1999, yet they get to keep the history (again, statistics.) of the old Browns? What exactly am I missing here that everyone else seems to understand regarding specific statistics? I don't mind connecting the lore of the past to the present. But team statistics and such should stay tied to their original owners no matter how far they travel. (If the original Browns won a Super Bowl for example, that should be credited to the Ravens because of the move. Not to the new expansion Browns.)
The reason why it's like this in the NFL is because the govner of Cleveland, Ohio got salty after the Pre-96 Browns left for Baltimore and filed a law suit, which ended up allowing the players to move with the team to Baltimore, but the records, colors, & history was to be transferred to an Cleveland expansion team, resulting in the Modern-Day Browns being considered the same team as the Pre-96 Browns. TLDR: Cleveland got salty and sued
@@nmyster3201 It is very odd but he is right. Baltimore was actually considered an expansion team by the NFL, and the Browns were officially viewed as having "halted operations" until the new team came along, which the NFL promised would happen as soon as the original Browns left
The above explanations are correct. I have the 1997 NFL Handbook and among the franchises is listed the "Cleveland Browns Trust," which was created out of the litigation pursuant to Modell's departure. The agreement stipulated that the Baltimore Ravens would get a clean slate for their team and NFL records and that the expansion franchise would inherit the previous NFL history of the former Cleveland Browns. As an aside, if there is one franchise that deserves an SB win as much as the Lions, it's the Browns.
I feel the fins should be #1 I mean we’re the only team to go on a perfect season and win the Super Bowl, the pats did it but didn’t win the Super Bowl.
Yup , that would be the Dolphins alright . Nothing's ever managed to snap the 17-0 and if prime Tom Brady's Patriots couldn't , no one will , at least for the next 2,5 or so decades . But I believe our friend here is referring only to the RS games played by each team .
I understand that these are the same franchises, but in my opinion this would have been better if the records were recognized in the city the team currently plays in. "Indianapolis" Colts did not go 13-1, that was the Baltimore Colts. The "Los Angeles" Chargers have never gone 14-2 in their brief history, that was San Diego's accomplishment. Nothing wrong with the accuracy of this video, because franchise-wise the records are correct, but it would be better imo if the records reflected the team's current city
People who keep saying the '72 Dolphins should be first over the '07 Patriots are missing the point of the video. NE listed first because they were 16-0. It's that simple.
@@FusionCyborg well I mean, that's just a technicality. It's the exact same name in the exact same city, with only a 3 year gap. Yeah, the current-era Browns were born as an expansion team in 1999, but they're basically the same franchise as the previous Browns. The only thing that's different is ownership, which changes multiple times anyway. Lol
The dolphins should be infront of the patriots because the pats didn't go undefeated (lost in the Superbowl their record was 18-1) that season but Miami did in their season
I still think that was the greatest team ever. And I'm a Steeler fan.I'm not sad the Pats lost, quite happy actually, but you have to recognize the greatness of that 16-0 Pats team.
![โรงเรียนดัดสันดาน นักเรียนเถื่อน..!! [โรงเรียนไดเม่]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/vRKPeXn4Fl4/mqdefault.jpg)
Being a Panthers fan, that 2015 season is still kind of a shock.
fr
My dad is a major panthers fan so he was genuinely mad about that game
That was a fun season too bad Von Miller made Cam choke bad
@@tylerseverance5789 and you know, cotchery not getting a catch called which completely changed the flow of the game
@@mse2130 well that and the league needed Peyton stoeybook ending. I kinda knew the score from the opening Panthers drive were this was going, too bad Kuehcely plqyed coverage and not go after Peyton. The whole game stank from the getgo
For relevancy, the minimum for games played is 14 and all seasons were after 1940!
Shoutout to the 1934 Bears though for going 13-0 that year
Shoutout louder for the Bears team that beat the Skins 73-0 for the championship. Same era. As opposed to the 1934 Bears, who lost the Sneakers Game.
And the 1932 Bears, who finished with a 7-1-6 record. No, that was not a typo.
@@turbokart3776 Yeesh. In the overtime era, no team has even tied twice in a season. The Rams and 49ers came within a few seconds of tying each other twice in 2012, but that's about as close as any team has gotten.
Last team to tie in consecutive weeks was the 1970 Atlanta Falcons.
@@turbokart3776 overtime wasnt implemented in the regular season till the late 50's
Baltimore was about 2 yards away from winning against the Pats during their 16-0 season and also lost to Miami, that would be Miami's only win on the year. Imagine a team that wins against what would end up being a 15-1 team and loses to a 1-15 team in the same year.
Sounds like something the Steelers would do.
It was even crazier than that. The Pats were down 4 that game with 1 chance left on 4th down. They DIDNT GET IT, and it looked like their perfect season was over, but the Ravens coach called a timeout for NO REASON that cancelled the play. The Pats would get the 4th down on their second chance and then win the game.
@@hiimemily a very steelers thing to do
Meanwhile I was cheering Lemon to Camarillo like it was Marino to Clayton.
@@sStyleMo goddamn Rex Ryan
2001 for the Rams was one to never forget. That was the best season of the Greatest Show on Turf, and pretty much the staple of Kurt's career to that point.
Too bad that an evil empire rose to prominence in that Superbowl.
Great records. Just some teams couldn't win the big one
Cough patriots cough
🤣🤣🤣🤣
Please don’t remind me.
It don’t mean a thing if you don’t win the ring.
@@scootscootriot1020 -1996 Bulls
Jets Going more than 5
Inpressive
1968 Jets are in my top 5 all time. Most lovable, watchable, rootable, and downright REAL team ever.
In 2005, the Seattle Seahawks went 13-3 as well.
But they didn’t win the super bowl that’s why 2013 was better
Well it's obvious they're going by most recent. The Saints won the Super Bowl with a 13-3 record in the 2009 season, but this list put the 2019 Saints instead, lol. The creator of the video applied that to every team.
If it weren't for a less than steeler performance at Arrowhead, then Packers would have gone 16-0, but then again you can say that with any 15-1 team, like the Vikings.
1998 Vikings lost to the 1998 Falcons (14-2). My Vikes pick would be 1974. Best team they ever had, but ran into the Steelers a year after running into the Dolphins.
In 09 colts were 14-0 and only played their starters the first half on week 16, and only the first quarter and 1 play in the second quarter the final week. They would have most likely gone 16-0 but would have lost in the super bowl like patriots did.
I remember the Packers 2011 season well. After the game in Kansas City, I figured the Packers had the loss out of their system and could win another Super Bowl. But that was not to be as the fell to the New York Giants in the Divisional round after having a bye week in the playoffs.
Here's an idea for a future video: Most ties for an NFL franchise.
Also, love this music. 🎵 🎶
1 and 2 should be other way around. The Only Perfect Season should be #1
Idk what was going through there mind while making this. Your completely right
It’s based off seasons not playoffs if it included playoffs then of course it would be #1
TRVTH
Fr
This video is regular season only.
Fun fact: The Jags in 1999 lost their only playoff game so their complete record was 14-3 and all 3 losses were to the Titans.
Delusional Miami fans in a nutshell (MIA 7-62 JAX [1999 AFC Divisional Round Final])
Jaguars were 15-3. They beat the dolphins 62-7 in the divisional round which was also dan marinos last game. Their only 3 losses were to the titans though
dolphins should be number one (1972 dolphins only nfl team to complete a perfect season going 17-0)
But this is only counting REGULAR season games not post.
Agreed.
It's only regular season so no
@Prestin Hurshberry what are those 6
@Prestin Hurshberry those teams werent in the nfl era all those teams expect the Lions, Packers and Bears are defunct. Patriots lost in the Super Bowl so the '07 Pats dont count because they didn't finsish undefeated.
Would love to see an ‘end result’ along the bottom - in other words, to contrast “won it all” to “crashed out in the wild card”
Reverse #2 and #1. Miami finished the job with the same number of postseason games.
Fr
Miami went 17-0 in '72 including a Divisional playoff, a Championhip game, and a SB
New England went 18-1, including a Divisional, Championship, and SB loss
Order of the records (Updated for 2022-23):
32: 11-5, .688 (CLE)
31: 12-4, .750 (HOU)
30: 13-4, .765 (TB)
29-27: 11-3, .786 (DET, NYJ, CIN)
26-23: 13-3, .812 (TEN, SEA, NO, ARZ)
22: 14-3, 0.824 (PHI)
21 & 20: 12-2, .857 (BUF, DAL)
19-11: 14-2, .875 (NYG, WSH, KC, BAL, LAR, DEN, LAC, JAX, ATL)
10 & 9: 13-1, .929 (IND, LV)
8-3: 15-1, .938 (SF, CHI, MIN, PIT, GB, CAR)
2: 14-0, 1.000 (MIA)
1: 16-0, 1.000 (NE)
But is the best team the one with the best record? You could argue that the 1973 Dolphins, even with two losses including a thoroughly meaningless loss to Baltimore in week 13, was actually better. Their schedule was tougher, they were utterly dominant in the playoffs and Super Bowl (won all three games by 17+ points) and had the target on their backs the whole way. A lot of the writers and Dolphins players thought the 1973 team was better.
I know this much: I watched the 1998 and 2016 Falcons, and I can say without hesitation that in a playoff game, the 2016 Falcons would have beaten the 1998 Falcons by two or three touchdowns.
@@macofalltrades6396 Out of all the comments that you choose to reply this to, you chose the one that is just the list of the records as seen in the video, which ranked these teams by there best records in a single season.
If you want best season for each NFL team by their strongest roster, then search that up, or if it doesn't exist already, then make it yourself.
Why isn’t Cleveland still at 11-3?
The chargers fired their coach after he went 14-2 🤣
They need to GTFO Of LA. It’s so pathetic how they think they belong.
@@studmuffin6630 chargers moving to LA was so stupid, there was absolutely no reason for that
Every NFL Team's BEST Season:
Patriots: 2007-08
Dolphins: 1972-73
Panthers: 2015-16
Bears: 1985-86
Vikings: 1973-74
Browns: 1986-87
Buccaneers: 2002-03
Texans: 2012-13
Jets: 1968-69
Lions: 1991-92
Bengals: 1988-89
Titans: 1999-00
Seahawks: 2013-14
Eagles: 2017-18
Saints: 2009-10
Cardinals: 2008-09
Chargers: 1994-95
Falcons: 1998-99
Cowboys: 1977-78
Bills: 1990-91
Redskins: 1991-92
Giants: 1986-87
Rams: 2021-22
Chiefs: 2019-20
Jaguars: 1999-00
Broncos: 1998-99
Ravens: 2000-01
Raiders: 1976-77
Colts: 2006-07
49ers: 1984-85
Steelers: 2004-05
Miami going 14-0? impressive
The only perfect season in NFL history. New England lost SB and could only go 18-1
Patriots going 16and 0
@@gameallday8646 Miami won the SB. pats didnt
Imagine going 18-0 just to loose to the giants, As dolphins fan, could not relate
They won the playoffs and Super Bowl as well. The only undefeated season of the major U.S. professional sports leagues.
I realize it's regular season records, but the Dolphins should be number one as they also went undefeated in the playoffs as well, including the Super Bowl.
It's impressive, of the 6 times a team went 15-1 only 2 Won a Superbowl.
I think that's what happened to the 73-9 warriors too. It's difficult to win the championship with a very good record due to pressure and fatigue because you tried hard to win those regular season games.
@@anasslasry6962 also bigger the record the more motivated a team is to beat you
The 1998 Vikes didn't even get there.
@@macofalltrades6396 So true, nor did the Steelers.
@@vincentr.6109 or the Packers
The Jets, Lions, Browns and Bengals all having a best at 11-3 wasn't surprising in the slightest
This is a decent ranking of best NFL seasons by team...
The only thing is that the 85' Chicago Bears should be ranked higher than the 15' Carolina Panthers considering that despite both had considerably even win percentages and both were in the superbowl in their respectable seasons...
The deciding factor is that Although The 15' Carolina Panthers did make it to the superbowl... They lost to the Devver Broncos 10 - 24
Whereas The 85' Chicago Bears made it to the superbowl and won against the New England Patriots with a score of 46 - 10 !!
So all in all...
The 85' Chicago Bears season went far better than the 15' Carolina Panthers season and as such technically should have them higher ranked...
Redskins 1991-1992 team is one of the most dominant teams in NFL history
NHL one next
Amazing
For Those Wondering…
This List Is Ranked By Regular Season Records, Not If They Won The Super Bowl.
Would've been cool if we got to see if these teams got to/won the super bowl or not
Where does your favorite team rank?!
#1. Pats fan. Hate that season though.
#17
Last of course
@@secretsquirrel8797 Don't hate the season. Hate how it ended.
15
whenever i see the bears top 10 im like
hold up
the bears were good?
The Saints have gone 13-3 4 times but 2009 should’ve been used instead since they won the Super Bowl that year
And didnt they start off 13-0?
@@willclapp1845 yes they did
The list-guy was just going by most recent teams. Lol
With an * due to bountygate
@@TheEgganator324 Vikings had a bounty too so what’s ur point?
Crazy to think that 3/5 of the top 5 teams didn’t win the Super Bowl
Ravens 2019 was so much wasted potential. They were a super bowl team but the receivers choked against the playoffs
Wonder how many of the team's best regular season were also Super... ahem, I mean, Big Game champions?
So the Texans best and worst records were in back to back years 🤔
Only true saints fans know that the 2019 season was not he best
Only 4 out of the 10 teams with 1 loss or less seasons actually won it all. 76 raiders, 84 niners, 85 bears, and 72 fins. 68 colts lost the biggest upset in sb history as 18 pt favorites, 04 steelers got slapped by 04 pats(ty spygate), 98 vikings choked big time vs atlanta off a missed fg by Gary Anderson. 2011 packers lost to the giants in the divisional which i find funny. 2015 panthers folded in the spotlight and were never the same. And 2007 patriots...........lol
The Browns best season was their 12-4 season when they won the AFC.
Except the Miami Dolphins won Super Bowl VII. Can't say the same for Brady and the Pats.
You missed the 1975 Steelers who went 12-2 in the regular season. They also won the Super Bowl that season. You also missed the 1978 Steelers who went 14-2 and also won the Super Bowl. There was no Indianapolis Colts in 1968; they were the Baltimore Colts. There was no Las Vegas Raiders in 1976; they were the Oakland Raiders.
Patriots couldn’t close the deal. Only Miami’s season is perfect.
The Cardinals’ best and worst all time records were just a few years apart
Btw Seattle was 13-3 2005 and cowboys 2016
*starts petition to put the Dolphins at 1 and Hacktriots at 2*
when your ' teams best season ' was back ni the early 60's.....dang...thats a long time ago- meanwhile Gb's best season was just 10 years ago , and aside from the 2015 panthers 15-1 mark- the only other team with a better record is the 2007 patriots who went 16-0 but lost the SB anyway-
For everyone that is talking about the dolphins and patriots, the patriots won 16 games and dolphins only won 14. Yes, I know that the dolphins won the Super Bowl but that is the reason.
Some teams tied their own records over the years...
Perhaps redo this and add the record then below the record the years they achieved it even if it was 2-3 times
The bears went 13-0 in 1934
0:17 Broadway Joe
When i see this, my mind focus on New England Patriots. But it is so near yet so far.
Still can't believe the 98 Vikings didn't beat the Falcons...
Yeah. Gary Anderson missing that field goal in the NFC championship game was a shock. Especially after being perfect the whole season. Vikings playing the Broncos in that Super Bowl would’ve been a better and closer game as well.
Get over it, it happened 23 years ago!
They got jinxed by the announcer saying Anderson hasn't missed all year. Oops missed
@@terencehill2320 lol
@@Classicrocker6119 The Super Bowl game might have been closer if the Falcons' Eugene Robinson doesn't get arrested for soliciting prostitution the night before the game.
If we count the old Browns (now the Ravens) and new Browns as separate franchises, the new Browns would be last at 11-5.
the old browns and the new browns are the same team. the name and history was bought back from the ravens so ravens only go back to 1996
@@topns4061 exactly. The same team name and same city, with only a 3 year gap in between. The only difference between the old Browns and new Browns is ownership, which can change multiple times anyway, lol. You could technically separate them if you fixate on semantics, but honestly they're both the same franchise.
its crazy that 13-3 teams are so early in the leaderboard
Not so much . Think about it ; Since the RS period holds up for 16 matches , the no1 seed in both divisional and - most importantly - conference board is bestowed upon teams bearing an average score of 2 to - in very extreme types of situations - 5 loses during the 16 game schedule . Thus , using simple math and of course the official standings presented in the video , it is safe to assume that the 13-3 record could be the average score in a #1 seeded team headed for the playoffs .
@@panoskakkavas4022still crazy
Nope the Dolphins should be number 1 as they were 17-0, winning the super bowl. That was the greatest single season ever. No one before or since has
been able to duplicate their feet.
Notice number one. 16-0. Until they met a team with a defense. Brady laughing about how they were going to score ONLY 17 points. Plax gave your pathetic offense WAY to much credit.
WTF is that mascot for the team that went 11-3 in 65?
Alright I need an explanation from SOMEONE. So back in 2011 when the NHL's Atlanta Thrashers moved to Winnipeg, the team was renamed to the Jets. However, *as far as I'm aware*, I don't ever hear anyone combining their history (more specifically, statistics) with the old Winnipeg Jets that are now the Arizona Coyotes. Yet I hear/see things with the Cleveland Browns that constantly make callbacks to the old Cleveland Browns that are now the Baltimore Ravens. I hear it on broadcasts, I hear it from friends, and I saw it on this channel. The old Browns moved to Baltimore in 1996. The new Browns were an expansion team founded in 1999, yet they get to keep the history (again, statistics.) of the old Browns? What exactly am I missing here that everyone else seems to understand regarding specific statistics? I don't mind connecting the lore of the past to the present. But team statistics and such should stay tied to their original owners no matter how far they travel. (If the original Browns won a Super Bowl for example, that should be credited to the Ravens because of the move. Not to the new expansion Browns.)
The reason why it's like this in the NFL is because the govner of Cleveland, Ohio got salty after the Pre-96 Browns left for Baltimore and filed a law suit, which ended up allowing the players to move with the team to Baltimore, but the records, colors, & history was to be transferred to an Cleveland expansion team, resulting in the Modern-Day Browns being considered the same team as the Pre-96 Browns.
TLDR: Cleveland got salty and sued
@@FusionCyborg I think that reason is kinda stupid, but at least there's a reason. Thank you for explaining.
@@nmyster3201 It is very odd but he is right. Baltimore was actually considered an expansion team by the NFL, and the Browns were officially viewed as having "halted operations" until the new team came along, which the NFL promised would happen as soon as the original Browns left
@@geoffmarshall6925 this makes about as much sense as texas football being back every year, but thank you for the extra explanation.
The above explanations are correct. I have the 1997 NFL Handbook and among the franchises is listed the "Cleveland Browns Trust," which was created out of the litigation pursuant to Modell's departure. The agreement stipulated that the Baltimore Ravens would get a clean slate for their team and NFL records and that the expansion franchise would inherit the previous NFL history of the former Cleveland Browns.
As an aside, if there is one franchise that deserves an SB win as much as the Lions, it's the Browns.
Too bad they excluded Super Bowl and Playoff wins from this list.
I feel the fins should be #1 I mean we’re the only team to go on a perfect season and win the Super Bowl, the pats did it but didn’t win the Super Bowl.
Let's put the record straight... There is only one team that's gone 0, and won the big one.
Yup , that would be the Dolphins alright . Nothing's ever managed to snap the 17-0 and if prime Tom Brady's Patriots couldn't , no one will , at least for the next 2,5 or so decades . But I believe our friend here is referring only to the RS games played by each team .
Only about 4 of the top 10 teams won the Super Bowl .
I understand that these are the same franchises, but in my opinion this would have been better if the records were recognized in the city the team currently plays in. "Indianapolis" Colts did not go 13-1, that was the Baltimore Colts. The "Los Angeles" Chargers have never gone 14-2 in their brief history, that was San Diego's accomplishment. Nothing wrong with the accuracy of this video, because franchise-wise the records are correct, but it would be better imo if the records reflected the team's current city
Only difference between Miami and the pats is Miami actually won the super bowl🙃
Can't wait for 2021 cardinals to be added here as an update
This comment did not age well
Ohhhhh boy…
Oooooooof
🏍️ This one's so modern they can't list the Redskins for 1991 even though that's what they were.
People who keep saying the '72 Dolphins should be first over the '07 Patriots are missing the point of the video. NE listed first because they were 16-0. It's that simple.
Ravens also 12-4 in 2000 side note 4-0 in playoffs
Switch 1 and 2
The Packers were 12-0-1 in 1929, a winning percentage of .962.
he said only after 1940 and 14 games played at least
@@professornoob5970 I know, but I get tired of people choosing arbitrary cutoff dates.
Note: A winning rate of 1.000 was recorded for the 1929 Packers, since ties were completely voided in the standings until 1972.
I’m just surprised the Bucs have won 2 Super Bowls despite having the worst all-time record and a 12-4 best!
Well their best is 13-4 now
Cleveland has the worst all-time best record, at 11-5 (.688) when you exclude the Pre-96 Browns.
@@FusionCyborg well I mean, that's just a technicality. It's the exact same name in the exact same city, with only a 3 year gap. Yeah, the current-era Browns were born as an expansion team in 1999, but they're basically the same franchise as the previous Browns. The only thing that's different is ownership, which changes multiple times anyway. Lol
The Browns greatest season of all time was 11-5 in 2020… Fact!
2007 Patriots... A ring is missing...
almost but no, the giants gave the surprise in that superbowl and beat the so-called big patriots.
this and both NBA Warriors 2016 73-9 and MLB Mariners 2001 116-46 are three very painful ringless seasons
11 should be the 8-1 1982 redskins
Pats on top
But the Dolphins went 17 and zero in 1972 the best season ever
Bengals went 12-4 in 2015
GO PACK GO
holy shit an optic fan
2007 hurts.
Washington Redskins
The dolphins should be infront of the patriots because the pats didn't go undefeated (lost in the Superbowl their record was 18-1) that season but Miami did in their season
Thank you
So we should conflate all regular season stats with play off stats.
Sounds good to me.
Baltimore Ravens went 13-3 2006 season
Ok, So
Jets best season was 54 years ago hehe
Of course the jets best season was almost 50 years ago 🙃
Phins should be #1 because they actually went on to win the Superbowl, unlike those Patriots.
And then the Patriots lost the Super Bowl HAHAHAHA
I still think that was the greatest team ever. And I'm a Steeler fan.I'm not sad the Pats lost, quite happy actually, but you have to recognize the greatness of that 16-0 Pats team.
6 wins. Yours?
@@michaelloughlin1597 yea one dynasty which is also the reason you guys are not the greatest franchise ever
Patriots lost the super bowl that year…
‘72 Dolphins should be in the one spot. They finished 17-0. 2007 patriots lost to the GMEN
Brady sucks
Really ? 7 superbowls
What does that have to do with best NFL seasons by a team?
m.th-cam.com/video/1SxpiE0_FNY/w-d-xo.html
And most overrated player ever. Here are some facts.
patriots did not go 19-0 they lost super bowl
This is wrong the browns went 14-0 before
That was before they joined the nfl
If the playoffs where added, Miami should have been 1.
But the playoffs weren't add
Go figure, then Lions are the only team in the NFC North to never go 15-1.. 😅😅 Always last in the NFC North.
You got the Patriots and Dolphins backwards
72 Dolphins = 17-0
07 Patriots = the exact same record as the 85 Bears; 18 and a big fat ONE!
patriots did not win the super bowl lol
in 07
bnmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm