Boltzmann's constant

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 7 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 59

  • @ejkitchen
    @ejkitchen 9 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    This is a fantastic video. Very well done. I now understand much better where this constant came from. I am glad you took 8 minutes to explain it at the right level of detail.

  • @Diviner-ip2pq
    @Diviner-ip2pq ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I got my confidence back after watching this video, well explained and all thanks to you

  • @kamrankhankami7793
    @kamrankhankami7793 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    i love your way of explanation......
    i love the simple words you use like "LITTLE N"..... god bless you bro

  • @anthonynwankwo8159
    @anthonynwankwo8159 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    This was exactly what I needed in order to piece everything together, thanks!

  • @mariaorsic9763
    @mariaorsic9763 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Fantastic video!! Absolutely! I learned in 10 minutes MORE R versus Kb than in ALL of Chnag's lousy textbook! Thank you for your superb presentation.

  • @AllYourMemeAreBelongToUs
    @AllYourMemeAreBelongToUs 26 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    7:20 Boltzmann

  • @Galileosays
    @Galileosays 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thanks for the nice video.
    Boltzmann's constant k is actually a repair action to rescale the Kelvin temperature to the kinetic energy of a particle that has the most probably speed. In fact, a particle in an ideal gas at equilibrium has with the most probable speed (vp) the kinetic energy:
    Ekin = kT = 1/2 m (vp)^2, where m is the mass of a gas molecule.
    Boltzmann's famous formula is the entropy formula: S=k ln W, where W is the probability (Wahrscheinlichkeit) to have a particle in a particular state (place & impuls). If the absolute temperature wasn't defined earlier on the Kelvin scale, we would probably have an energy scale.
    The entropy formula would have been defined as: S = ln W, and the associated kinetic energy Ekin = (1/2 m(vp)^2) = new temperature scale.

  • @너뒤지기
    @너뒤지기 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    매우 감사합니다. 한국어 자막 까지 있어서 진짜 도움 많이 됐어요.
    very thanks from korea. It is helpful and especially korean subtitles are awesome!

  • @monochrome2058
    @monochrome2058 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    very well explained, thank you

  • @PatrickStar-lu3ot
    @PatrickStar-lu3ot 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    So the Boltzman's constant is the necessary amount of energy to raise the temperature of an atom or a molecule by 1 Kelvin, right?

  • @InfiniteGenresOfMusic
    @InfiniteGenresOfMusic 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Found a video called Spacemind- Memory Hole. Saw a comment that said the picture in the background is of Ludwigs equation. Decided to look it up. Not into science that much or mathematics, however I am intrigued by knowledge in general.
    Edit: Tbh, I do not even know if this shit even correlates to my search lol.

  • @willa4you
    @willa4you 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The moment I was waiting for the explanation to begin, the video ends! 😞 What's that constant about? Why the pressure times the volume variation is linear with the molecules number times the temperature TIMES THIS NUMBER?

  • @kshitijrai1438
    @kshitijrai1438 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thankyou so much! This was an awesome video now i am able to understand what the concept actually is?

  • @MegaMagicGoat
    @MegaMagicGoat 10 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Very helpful, thank you!

  • @hunar24
    @hunar24 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Really very well explained 👏

  • @dlugi4198
    @dlugi4198 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Trying to understand this in your second language in 12:00 is hard af. But I have done it. Thx

  • @jacjacl324
    @jacjacl324 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    do engines in hotter climate burn more oil or used more energy?

  • @50kT
    @50kT 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Why did we have to do all the Boltzmanns constant stuff? Seemed logical to just put Na below R since we wanted the constant to take on an equal amount of smallness after the big N

    • @johnbingham6355
      @johnbingham6355 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Unfortunalely this does not give the microstates given by …….n!/n1!n2!...…..N!/n.

  • @farihafirdaus4751
    @farihafirdaus4751 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you so much sir

  • @trevorallen3212
    @trevorallen3212 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I get about these formulas but, to me they seem to have circular reasoning for the difficulty of where they got their measurements from.

  • @guenterlohnert780
    @guenterlohnert780 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Brilliant !!

  • @micaelsan
    @micaelsan 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks, It was very clear...

  • @pmcgktr
    @pmcgktr 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you!

  • @UDAYKUMAR-jd8xr
    @UDAYKUMAR-jd8xr 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    tq a lot
    at last got wat I needed😊

  • @cbort8223
    @cbort8223 9 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Why is the unit of the boltzmann constant not written J/(K*Molecule)?

    • @das250250
      @das250250 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      Good question , it should be , based on this video . I haven't checked scientific data to see the way it is notated but check online ?

    • @pedroferrer1117
      @pedroferrer1117 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      number of molecules is just a number like number of apples, not really any SI unit

    • @cbort8223
      @cbort8223 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Peter Solis but the Boltzmann constant is the energy of a single molecule at a particular temperature, is it not? So why not just add the "per molecule"?

    • @pedroferrer1117
      @pedroferrer1117 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Avogadro's constant has the value 6.022140857(74)×1023 mol−1 in the International System of Units (SI), not (molecule)/mol, same reasoning applies to boltzmann's constant. Molecules is not defined as a measurement within the SI system of values. It's just a matter of notation, if you want to use the correct SI units it would be J/K. It's just the standard way of writing it, I'm not saying that J/K(molecule) is wrong though, for the purposes of solving a problem it might be just as effective if not better. In this example he could of written the /molecule to lessen confusion, but he decided to just write it in standard SI which is just about the same thing.

    • @cbort8223
      @cbort8223 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +Peter Solis so it is not wrong of me to at least know in my mind that the Boltzmann constant corresponds to the kinetic energy of a single molecule at a certain temperature?

  • @movitzek233
    @movitzek233 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very helpful. Thanks

  • @meltdown6856
    @meltdown6856 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    So, suppose I slap someone(not that I did), my hand has comparatively less speed compared to molecules, but it has a more mass and thus KE..., so will it cause the person I slapped to get warmer?

  • @tasinstarlight
    @tasinstarlight ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks 👍

  • @Anthony-pu6yk
    @Anthony-pu6yk 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Inconsitent: Left hand side of equation is PV=Pressure*volume = FORCE! Then, RHS of equation is ENERGY. The whole thing does not add from START.

    • @HSJ90
      @HSJ90 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Since p = F/A, therefore F = pA, not pV.

  • @LV426_Nostromo
    @LV426_Nostromo 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    thank you

  • @malekemerald9948
    @malekemerald9948 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    amazing big thanks

  • @MrKorrazonCold
    @MrKorrazonCold 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why is the unit of the Boltzmann constant not written as V= td +1=0 now -1 ds-t G/r2.. . .Velocity = Time Density +1=0 now -1 Density of Space Time G/r2.. . .Tap the side of a round bucket of water. . ..Because the Boltzmann constant is the bridge between probability and entropy.. . .With electrical potential , quantum potential , and gravitational potential all linked in the One Universal process of Spherical symmetry forming and breaking.. . .Tap the side of a round bucket of water. . ..Because everything is formed by a surrounding 4pi Spherical inward absorption +1=0 now -1 outward emission of electromagnetic waves.. . .All motion is 2pi Spiral.. . .And all 3D directions are 4pi Spherically curved thus Wave Centres are everywhere relative to an infinite future of potential possibilities continuously coming into +1=0 now -1 out of existence.. . .Now space is a division of Solidity into entropy as time unfolds C2 the second law of thermodynamics.. . .But also in the future E2 will equal a multiplication of Volume +1=0 now at the expense of gravitational potential -1.. . .E2=M2 C4+P2 C2.. . .Because surrounding probabilistic Implosive Potential Energy always comes first before becoming +1=0 now -1 explosive Kinetic Energy.. . .

  • @devind7460
    @devind7460 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thankssss

  • @Maarttttt
    @Maarttttt 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    better microphone?

    • @daniyalsiddiquiP1
      @daniyalsiddiquiP1 8 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      It was fine for me. I suggest better headphones/speakers.

  • @snakesandsticks
    @snakesandsticks 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Oh my god- I remember why I don't watch the Khan academy any more... They seriously need to invest in better audio recording equipment.

  • @aniani135
    @aniani135 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    I thought n= N*NA? @4:00

  • @khellil2
    @khellil2 9 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    8 minute for a division by Avogadro number? Shame on you.

    • @davidfuller1061
      @davidfuller1061 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      ((2.176470e-8​ ​kg​ ​*(1.616229e-35​ ​m)^2/(1.416808e+32​ ​K​ ​*((5.39116e-44​ ​s)^2) = (1.38064852e-23​ ​m^2 kg​ ​s^-2​ ​K^-1)​ ​
      ((Planck​ ​Mass​ ​*(Planck​ ​Length)^2/(Planck​ ​Temp​ ​*((Planck​ ​Time)^2) = (Bolzmanns​ ​Constant)​

  • @sarabjeetsodhi3283
    @sarabjeetsodhi3283 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    thank u sososososoaooaoaoaoaoaoasoossoosososossso much😊😊

  • @AqibAli-hd7xp
    @AqibAli-hd7xp 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    ♥️

  • @SaraSara-yd9sy
    @SaraSara-yd9sy ปีที่แล้ว

    ساعطيك قنبلة الحجر وحدك تفهم معنى ماادرسه .اريد فتح السفارة البريطانية .

    • @SaraSara-yd9sy
      @SaraSara-yd9sy ปีที่แล้ว

      استطيع اكمال كل ايحاثه وانت تعلم

  • @usman5954
    @usman5954 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Cool
    👍👍👍👍👍

  • @walterbrownstone8017
    @walterbrownstone8017 ปีที่แล้ว

    Too much talk, not enough real info. You don't even talk about Boltzmann's constant until 3:25

  • @aadriteebharadwaj4098
    @aadriteebharadwaj4098 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    🍰🍰🍰🍰

  • @FloppyDobbys
    @FloppyDobbys 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    Your voice sounds like Eric Hovind's voice lol. But you know worlds more about science than he does.

    • @david52875
      @david52875 10 ปีที่แล้ว

      Anyone who knows any amount of science knows infinitely more science than Eric Hovind.

    • @hypercuriosity9828
      @hypercuriosity9828 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      david but no one can have infinite amount of energy

  • @Yatukih_001
    @Yatukih_001 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    He realized the world is made out of Spirit and that is basically what atoms and molecules are...