Kinetic molecular theory of gases | Physical Processes | MCAT | Khan Academy

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 7 ส.ค. 2014
  • Created by David SantoPietro.
    Watch the next lesson: www.khanacademy.org/test-prep...
    Missed the previous lesson? www.khanacademy.org/test-prep...
    MCAT on Khan Academy: Go ahead and practice some passage-based questions!
    About Khan Academy: Khan Academy offers practice exercises, instructional videos, and a personalized learning dashboard that empower learners to study at their own pace in and outside of the classroom. We tackle math, science, computer programming, history, art history, economics, and more. Our math missions guide learners from kindergarten to calculus using state-of-the-art, adaptive technology that identifies strengths and learning gaps. We've also partnered with institutions like NASA, The Museum of Modern Art, The California Academy of Sciences, and MIT to offer specialized content.
    For free. For everyone. Forever. #YouCanLearnAnything
    Subscribe to Khan Academy’s MCAT channel: / @khanacademymcatprep
    Subscribe to Khan Academy: th-cam.com/users/subscription_...

ความคิดเห็น • 174

  • @alanbautista9247
    @alanbautista9247 9 ปีที่แล้ว +141

    You did a better gob at explaining this in 15 minutes than my professor in 3 weeks. Thank you!

    • @Vultimo
      @Vultimo 9 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      same here!

    • @evastatrmercer4357
      @evastatrmercer4357 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Same for me !

    • @evamartini2478
      @evamartini2478 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      My teacher tried it in 15 minutes as well and that did not work out

    • @juzzgail667
      @juzzgail667 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      3weeks?????? My professor kust gabe us random worksheets lmao. no discussions

    • @teenagegamers8015
      @teenagegamers8015 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      My private teacher in 13.5 mins

  • @JoshuaSalazarMejia
    @JoshuaSalazarMejia 9 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    The best explaination that I've found over the web, thanks!
    You're an excellent teacher David!

  • @manareldredy9820
    @manareldredy9820 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    it's the perfect way to explain it
    i've been skippin phy lectures and watchin vids instead
    cuz when i watch these vids i understand the subject well and the best of all i don't fall asleep

  • @anonymous-8259
    @anonymous-8259 7 ปีที่แล้ว +28

    so here i am watching this khan's video instead of listening to my lecturer.
    Tbh its easier to learn here than to learn from my professor and it took me less than 15 minutes to figure out things than listening to my professor for 2 hours session.
    SO WHY AM I PAYING MY COLLEGE TUITION FEES FOR :((((((

  • @dad7547
    @dad7547 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    This is quite literally one the best Physics videos out there. Gave me goosebumps learning about this :)

  • @trappraizzy
    @trappraizzy 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    its been 7 freaking years and this is still helpful, thanks man.

  • @halo4eva100
    @halo4eva100 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Just went to a lecture and didnt understand most of this stuff, watched two Khan academy videos and everything is so clear to me now. Thanks you!!!

  • @jacobvandijk6525
    @jacobvandijk6525 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    @ 8:23 The only thing we get is a formula telling us how to calculate the pressure P when N particles hit ONE SIDE OF THE BOX at the same time. What about the pressure on the other walls??? @ 11:07 Only 1/3N particles are hitting that ONE WALL !!!

  • @Marisa-mv4cw
    @Marisa-mv4cw 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    i've been relying on TH-cam explanations for my finals lol Khan Academy did a stellar job at explaining every single subject. propsssss.

  • @rifathasan2741
    @rifathasan2741 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Oh god... I wasted more than 7 days on this topic none couldn't explain it . At last i got it. Thank you 😍

  • @sickboydroid
    @sickboydroid 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    OMG! That was a great explaination (especially for the last part)
    You are a life saver dude...
    Love from India ❤️

  • @chibuikeagba8591
    @chibuikeagba8591 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    I wish I saw this before today. Thank you very much for making me understand this.

  • @cosettegarzon5322
    @cosettegarzon5322 7 ปีที่แล้ว +35

    I was so distracted by the cube doing the weird optical illusion thing

    • @Zeegoku1007
      @Zeegoku1007 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yeah , same.

    • @aboldone3991
      @aboldone3991 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I hate you. I can't unsee it now.

  • @jugalshah9261
    @jugalshah9261 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thankyou sir, you helped me understand that why aren't we taking the delta t as the time of impact,, God Bless you

  • @RahulYadav-ix8ky
    @RahulYadav-ix8ky 8 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    delta t should be the time taken for the change in velocity bw the collision on the surface of wall
    my doubt

  • @CarlosJimenez-fj4ku
    @CarlosJimenez-fj4ku 5 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    "It's so important I'm gonna write it again"
    -David SantoPietro, 2014

  • @togrulnbili8703
    @togrulnbili8703 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    that is exactly what i was looking for.Thanks for great explanation

  • @a7mad3bbas
    @a7mad3bbas 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    wow !! really appreciate it ! .. such an awesome explanation!!

  • @FangsShadow
    @FangsShadow 9 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Why isn't this up on the website with the ideal gas equation series?

  • @percyjacks8170
    @percyjacks8170 9 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Simply amazing! I understand it a lot better now, the use of colours really helped too :)

  • @xigong3009
    @xigong3009 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    The mentioning of the link between macroscopic and microscopic quantities is great!

  • @muddyagua
    @muddyagua 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    thx for making understand the 1/3 in this formula which my professor just wanted me to memorize mechanically

  • @user-ic4uz8ee9x
    @user-ic4uz8ee9x 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    thank you so much for your kind and sophisticated explanation !

  • @vigneshsubash8970
    @vigneshsubash8970 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for your video! Seriously helped a lot.

  • @user-hc6tk3vz9d
    @user-hc6tk3vz9d 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    this is fantastic, really love it

  • @hampirestoration
    @hampirestoration หลายเดือนก่อน

    Calculation of the pressure of an ideal gas...! It's in HC verma.. but this video makes it even more easy to follow! 😊

  • @mikomurray1661
    @mikomurray1661 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    I loved this video. You explained it so well and made me pretty excited about doing some maths in the process! Nice work :)

  • @ahmedsalem4675
    @ahmedsalem4675 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    These very helpful

  • @SkylerWhiteYoo
    @SkylerWhiteYoo 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Man, you are amazing! Thank you!

  • @samsunnahar9175
    @samsunnahar9175 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you so much for your excellent explanation!!

  • @ccl051485
    @ccl051485 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very clear for me understand

  • @violat6549
    @violat6549 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    really helpful

  • @segasaturn3215
    @segasaturn3215 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Are you assuming that all particles are traveling in a straight line from one end of the container to the other by using 2L as the distance?

  • @jasonlosslow2423
    @jasonlosslow2423 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    good explanation as always
    Thx khan academy

  • @samsonodoyo8144
    @samsonodoyo8144 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    amazing explanation David

  • @aniljyotir9788
    @aniljyotir9788 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    It was so much fun to learn it

  • @hypercuriosity9828
    @hypercuriosity9828 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you 😊

  • @taromellon
    @taromellon 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    THANK YOU

  • @babulroy3093
    @babulroy3093 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very clear presentation.

  • @TheKing-th1en
    @TheKing-th1en 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great explanation.good job 👍🔥🔥🔥

  • @harsh8457
    @harsh8457 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Superb video
    Thanks for clearing bdoubt

  • @eccleziassenat3262
    @eccleziassenat3262 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    great explanation i love it.

  • @Mooloolah28
    @Mooloolah28 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks man, like always.

  • @zabintanfa7650
    @zabintanfa7650 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    It was really very good and helpful.

  • @Calvin3578
    @Calvin3578 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    I AM GOING TO HAVE A PHYSICS EXAM IN THE COMING WEDNESDAY. THIS VIDEO IS REALLY AMAZING! THANK YOU SO MUCH BRO!

    • @sarahkaveh7739
      @sarahkaveh7739 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      It was 5 years ago 😃i just wonder what your career is now or what you are doing

  • @muhammad.husnain6819
    @muhammad.husnain6819 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    u are amazing mate

  • @stonebrother3751
    @stonebrother3751 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wallahi you are awesome :D

  • @HorizonSpeed26
    @HorizonSpeed26 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very nice and interesting presentation.

  • @theiigotriangularround4880
    @theiigotriangularround4880 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    For those who don't get why we took time interval instead of Collison time ans what it tells us . Well it gives us magnitude of force as if a force acted on particle as it went from one wall to another wall and back.

  • @hritikgogoi3577
    @hritikgogoi3577 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    I become your fan. So nice... 😇

  • @starkkyr7976
    @starkkyr7976 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    thank you khanacademy

  • @ms32chiacaixin75
    @ms32chiacaixin75 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank You !

  • @geetathakur445
    @geetathakur445 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you thank you thank you!👍👍👍👍👍👍

  • @mahaboobbashashaik148
    @mahaboobbashashaik148 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can you please also make a video explaining the derivation in the first chapter of Max Born's Atomic Physics for same equation?

  • @sunildeshpande6600
    @sunildeshpande6600 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    is temperature related to the only translatory motion of the gas molecules or also to rotatory and vibratory motion? if so why do we only consider the change in the linear momentum in the discussion?

    • @sickboydroid
      @sickboydroid 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yeah actually for real gases you have to consider that as well. But for ideal we neglect all intermolecular force and gravitational force so particles always move in a straight line path (called free path).
      They change directions only when they collide with other particles but after colliding they again travel in straight line path. So you don't need to calculate any other momentum other than linear momentum for ideal gases

  • @thinhl8683
    @thinhl8683 9 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Is this on Khan Academy Website?

  • @jazirusharifu8393
    @jazirusharifu8393 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    good presentation

  • @arcollaboration9380
    @arcollaboration9380 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    The explanation made me like and share he video

  • @nithishreddy1690
    @nithishreddy1690 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    excellent boss

  • @shubhanshu4889
    @shubhanshu4889 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    thanks a lot bro you just saved me from failing

  • @kayannahall5723
    @kayannahall5723 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    God bless you :)

  • @eshakurwa
    @eshakurwa 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sincere thanks. You made my day. Concepts cant be cleared any better :-)

  • @MohamedGamal-rv3cm
    @MohamedGamal-rv3cm 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Question, How come we use delta P = 2 mVx , and the V here is for velocity then you used v= x/t where V here stands for speed not velocity and took its valuue to plug it in the delta P = 2 mvx . explanation please?

  • @ottoomen5076
    @ottoomen5076 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    excellent presentation. Does anyone know of any molecular theory of gases books?

  • @ewoigbesamuel5558
    @ewoigbesamuel5558 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice❤️.

  • @frankgetachew1833
    @frankgetachew1833 ปีที่แล้ว

    You're my best

  • @drakerocky7808
    @drakerocky7808 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    thanks

  • @jagratsingh3664
    @jagratsingh3664 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    It will take longer then 2l as there are intermolecular collisions also increasing time

  • @emanalwan6461
    @emanalwan6461 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Something didn't make sense to me. when we talk about change in momentum isn't delta t the time spent in the collision itself why would we use the time between two different collisions?

  • @saivarun656
    @saivarun656 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    It's too simple my teacher was explaining this in a quite complicated way that I just.....dozed off😴😴😴😝😝

  • @marcusw3541
    @marcusw3541 7 ปีที่แล้ว

  • @Jaideep_Joy
    @Jaideep_Joy 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wow amazing explanation you made it look really easy....

    • @kevinpham597
      @kevinpham597 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +jaideep sohal Seriously. What I love is how he says how awesome each equation is and then explains what they're supposed to mean.

    • @zayaanpandi7538
      @zayaanpandi7538 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      why do your pic have the MIDDLE FINGER :(

    • @technodeus1122
      @technodeus1122 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      There are two fingers lol... It doesn't have just middle finger

  • @joza-bi3iz
    @joza-bi3iz 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Algebra God!!!

  • @mazenmohammed3262
    @mazenmohammed3262 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanx

  • @thaison7332
    @thaison7332 ปีที่แล้ว

    ty sir

  • @jexk2985
    @jexk2985 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I don't understand why velocity in this lesson equal to distance over time please anyone answer ? And why did the displacement equal to 2L?

  • @saskiakristofedes9836
    @saskiakristofedes9836 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    There r 10 concepts of KMT of gases right? could u explain those individually?

  • @mariumali4852
    @mariumali4852 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I still don't get the reason given at 4:15

  • @prathameshnakhawa4975
    @prathameshnakhawa4975 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    I have a doubt if we assume that total p particles are there and then we say n number of particles collide in the right plane in x directionand say some x particles collide in the upper plane in y direction then how is the mean velocity is same ux= uy=uz

  • @mihaimi9978
    @mihaimi9978 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Ideal gas with:
    P=10^5Pa
    V=2 l
    What is the average kinetic energy of translational motion of the molecules of this gas?

    • @AnkitaMazumder24
      @AnkitaMazumder24 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Mihai Mi Either number of molecules of gas or number of moles of gas is required to solve it.

  • @sudhapriyashrivastava6808
    @sudhapriyashrivastava6808 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Please explain why Velocity in x,y,z directions are equal.

    • @abenphilip4283
      @abenphilip4283 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Since the gas is isotropic...(having same proper ties in all directions)

  • @Seishiro_Nagi_11
    @Seishiro_Nagi_11 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Can some one answer me
    the air density is less in higher altitude that of lower altitude meanings , gas molecules due to effect of gravity have more density and form lower layer of atmosphere in more amount. It is against one of the postulates of KTOG of is the assumption wrong!?

  • @khushalsiddiq7852
    @khushalsiddiq7852 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    How do you work out Vx2 average.

  • @akashghorai2804
    @akashghorai2804 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Like it

  • @Aerosmissive
    @Aerosmissive 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    please someone let me know the difference of Energy of Electron kT between molcule E=3/2kT

  • @mhmmdhaggag
    @mhmmdhaggag 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    hiiiican you tell me please what ddi you use to make this video what is that tool you use to appear on screen like a black board???

    • @RogueNiNja99138
      @RogueNiNja99138 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Mohammed haggag Sal uses SmoothDraw v2.1

    • @vintagescorpio49
      @vintagescorpio49 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +manuveer singh and movtavi, and microsoft paint, and... yea

  • @amansinghal2431
    @amansinghal2431 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    just a curious question what are u using to write because it looks like handwriting but I can see the cursor?

  • @Lynx-ps7kg
    @Lynx-ps7kg 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    ❤❤❤

  • @brianbycroft6090
    @brianbycroft6090 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    In the macroscopic world, if it was a ball bouncing against a wall, to calculate momentum change, and thus force, the delta(t) would be the time in contact with the wall, not total travel time. For much of the time period 2L/v, there is no momentum change. Why is this larger time period used at the microscopic level??

    • @brianbycroft6090
      @brianbycroft6090 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Brian Bycroft Makes perfect sense, after I read the notes on the video! My apologies

    • @elangz9201
      @elangz9201 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Brian Bycroft can u explain it to me pleasee

    • @danehas4078
      @danehas4078 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Brian Bycroft which note?

    • @justpauify
      @justpauify 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Help please

  • @zainabhussain3887
    @zainabhussain3887 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    💜

  • @agent475816
    @agent475816 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    @Hamza Shaukat Khan Acadamy is just an organization.

  • @non-premiumgamers5960
    @non-premiumgamers5960 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Awesome 🤣🤣🤣🤣

  • @ryanmagbitang7545
    @ryanmagbitang7545 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    does anyone knows what app is he using here?

  • @kay-wh8gq
    @kay-wh8gq 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Man you killed the shit outta the topic.

  • @DfitDoc
    @DfitDoc 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I did fifteen pushups for you

  • @SBB628
    @SBB628 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    we have assumed that the walls of the container are elastic for molecular collisions. actually the walls may be inelastic. why does this makes no difference as long as the walls are at the same temperature as the gas?....answer plzzz

    • @tmb0183
      @tmb0183 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      The weight of the gas molecules is very, very less compared to that of the container that their collisions don't create an effect on the container. moreover due to this they get rebounded with the same velocity

    • @AnkitaMazumder24
      @AnkitaMazumder24 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      You may want to study the assumptions made for an ideal gas to derive these equations.

  • @douglasw1545
    @douglasw1545 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    SO confusing. about to just keep watching it till it clicks ☺

  • @haninazirah4715
    @haninazirah4715 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Im so sleepy during physics class so im here to revise back this alien formula

  • @AnkitKumar-xr8yc
    @AnkitKumar-xr8yc 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    why are we adding all N molecule forces at a same time because all the molecules of gases cant hit the face at same time please answer

    • @TheLogmp
      @TheLogmp 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Ankit Kumar Great question. It's a fine point, but he adds all the particles at the same time because if you remember when he was replacing delta t, he stated that delta t was the time interval for a particle to collide with the wall, bounce off the parallel wall on the other side, and then come all the way back. That means every particle will eventually collide with the wall during that time interval.
      There are alternative derivations where you leave delta t and apply it to the number of molecules moving rightward at a given time, in which case you do divide by one half (because half are moving rightward the other half are moving leftward), which is what you were probably thinking to do. That method is also completely fine and you arrive at the same answer. I prefer that method because you don't have to arbitrarily multiply by one half to see the kinetic energy term. It's there from the beginning. :)

  • @lytvynenkod
    @lytvynenkod 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    This explanaition is wrong !!! You can't use the momentan force applyed on the wall like it will be with F= ∆p /∆ t , but you need the average Force applyed on ONE WALL (always the same).
    So you have to calculate the total momentum over the time (F_average=p_tot / time_tot) and to dothat , you make a sum over all the momentum diveded by the sum of all times.
    => F_average = (-2 p_x (t_contact ) + 0 (t_travel)) / (t_contact + t_travel) = (-2 p_{x} (t_contact ) / (t_contact + t_travel) , the 0 is the momentum aplied on the wall for time that particle is away from the wall (t_travel ).
    since t_travel >>>>>>> t_contact YOU GET F_average_ = (-2 p_{x} (t_contact ) / (t_travel)
    This detail is very important for the logical construction of the solution , otherwise you learn wrong concepts.