@@irineojason depends on how it's measured.sometines view (s) is off axis and overestimate , that's the reason measurements should be correspond with visual estimation ( all views) . Good experienced eyes estimation is more accurate than biplane
My EF was 68% last year was done by another dr. The year before that it was 55-60%. Visual estimates corresponded with measurements. So how come it’s not corresponding this year. I’ll go with the biplane.
Thank you so much for your wonderful explanation
you are very welcome:
have you check this one?:
th-cam.com/video/vnJgsaavr0o/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/Aot4BfDIEx0/w-d-xo.htmlsi=LNsQfPGhRAutRFUp
Why does my report say the visual estimate of 50 to 55% but the LV biplane EF is 68%?
@@irineojason depends on how it's measured.sometines view (s) is off axis and overestimate , that's the reason measurements should be correspond with visual estimation ( all views) . Good experienced eyes estimation is more accurate than biplane
My EF was 68% last year was done by another dr. The year before that it was 55-60%. Visual estimates corresponded with measurements.
So how come it’s not corresponding this year.
I’ll go with the biplane.
@@irineojason talk to your Dr, too much difference