hi, but the territory of the Sakha Republic is larger than the territory of Kazakhstan. Sakha 3103.2 thousand km², Kazakhstan 2724.9 thousand km². and before the annexation of the USSR, the territory was even larger. we are direct descendants of the Huns.
Анексия)))) СССР ваши жопы мыл чтоб якутия существовало спокойно ей нужно хотябы иметь весь дальний восток а иначе условия загубят в общем ваша судьба всю жизнь быть с Россией
Saxa is pronounced Yeka by surrounding ethnos, right? On old maps it’s written Yeka Mongols. We say Žeke in Qazaq. We are both Moghuls. Modern Mongolians are Khitans.
@@Qazaq_Qiyat_1465 they pronounced yak because they couldn’t pronounce the letter S. it’s the same as the Kazakhs pronouncing Žeke because the Kazakhs pronounce Ž. we are not yeke and not zeke. we are SAKHA its meaning white(solar)
Proto Turkic cultures started west of baikal and north of beijing to be exact. What yo ustated is not wrong but it's the date of the slabgrave culture. VERY NICE VIDEO!!!!!!!
Azerbaijani language used in Safavid and Qajar dynasty. Of course their offical language is persian. But azerbaijani is still important language. For example azerbaijani used in Safavid army , court more than persian. Nice video by the way
Enough to misinform people, in those days there was no language of science, official, state, there was no such thing! such divisions began only in the 20th century.
the language of the safavid army, court of the king, and the language even the king (shah ismail) wrote poetry in was persian. The title of the king of safavi was "Shah" instead of the turkic "sultaan". The word "azarbijan" is persian, "azar" being old persian for "fire" and "bijan" meaning defended by.
deliberately problematic information. You deliberately ignored Southern Azerbaijan, which shows the closeness of this channel to Persian fascism. Azerbaijani Turks, the founders of Iran, still live in Southern Azerbaijan with a population of 40 million.
@@TechHistory17 Nice one, but - No. Your «Yaka» is «Sağa» for us. Ancient turkic: «Saqa» Ancient mongolic: «Zaqa» This name came to us TOO in ancient times. Therefore, officially according to legend “supposedly” means «Clean», «White», «Sunny». (Ancient turkic: Sağ² - Crystal Clean) But in our language it can be translated in a variety of ways. 1. «Saq saqattan» - Since the beginning. Implied as people born at the origins. 2. «Saq»³ - Moment in time/Time interval. Implies as people living at a modern time. 3. «Saq»² - Expression of Disappointment/Dissatisfaction/Renunciation. Implied that the Sakhas were renounced from Mongol Khanates several hundred centuries ago. Possibly during the time of the Kurıkans (ancestors of Sakha). Interesting translations. Ancient turkic: Saq¹ - Healthy, prosperous, Saq⁵ - Intelligence, wit, ingenuity
u might think,im weird,but i think vise versa... in the map,bulgar and chuvash seem to be the last turkic languages developing among the ural altay turkic family tree... no... the ancient proto bulgar and chuvash language is the oldest i think,and it dates back long before sumer... since in sumerian chuvash,old hungarian word formation and assimilation takes place...there is an article from two greek scholars who classify chuvash the oldest turkic language,because it is closely related to some sumer structures... also most hungarian scholars state that chuvash effected hungarian,and also chuvash,hungarian,sumerian,tatar, mongolian word comparisons were made,and it turns out,chuvash is the leader out of these,and most bulgar,tatar,mongolian,sumer words derive from chuvash... its at least some 5000 years old,because sumerian is at least 4000 years old...
@@CCMapping its known that azteks and similiar indian tribes have the same common ancestor w the turks from central asia before they split...most probably tens of thousands of years ago
@@CCMapping its not that way...ive been comparing these languages for years...nothing is coincidences...apropos languages...the atabaskans and several other native americans are known to have agglutinative languages,most probably these languages first were formed in siberia,stretching from the urals to the altays,and the native indians had common words like kan or tepe which are related to a common ancestor...later todays languages were formed,but they have the same logic,the same scaffolding...
This is all wrong. Proto Turkish didnot started in Asia. It originated from Africa and found a place to hide in Central Asia. When you study the Lidya , Prig, Ancient Greek or Tamil language there are many Turkish words in them. Especially the place names.
Orta Asya’da devasa bir Türk devlet olması gerekiyor türkün Türkten başka dostu yoktur diyerekten büyütüldük ama bakıyorum ki en büyük düşman da kendimize biz yapmışız bu kadar farklı devlet nasıl kurulabilir
Sovyet ihtilali başında Türkistan ssr vardı zaten Lenin öldükten sonra sovyet yönetimi bölerek günümüzdeki haline getirdi bugün orada tek Türkistan değil 4 ayrı devlet olması sovyetlerin eseridir
@@CCMapping Who do you think you are, to assign us 2,200 years and yourselves 5,000-10,000 years? Who gave you permission to talk about history and especially about us?
The Turks are hypothesized to originate in Manchuria, but the evidence suggests there were a mix of Turks and other peoples and the modern Turks originated after the Xiongnu fell about 2,200 years ago and the Turks borrowed nomadic lifestyle from Iranians and Europeans to expand.
@@CCMapping Now, in your dreams, do you want to take us out of Altai and imprison us in Manchuria? I can't find words for your impudence and courage. Do you want to call us mixed and thieves and take over our geography and culture? If we ask Europeans, they will say that we own everything also Bing Bang include. Therefore, it is absurd to take you seriously. Stop pseudo mythical fantasies.Wake up from sleep. Only Europeans like slavic, germanic,british people talk about the fantastical hypothesis. Because these nations have no history, culture, or written literature. They try to cover up their incompetence and put their own thief characters on the others. Supposedly all civilisations are Northern Europeans origin.You have nothing that is why you thief Germans, Slavs,Britanians,Balkanians are busy stealing the history of the Turks, the history of the Near East, and the history of the Uralic,Caucasian,Dravidian peoples. You have nothing to do with ancient history, culture, or civilization. Germans,Britanians,Balkanian and Slavians are mutated communities from the Uralic and Turkic peoples. Genetic, Anthropological, Cultural traditions, Religion,Epics,Mythologies and Linguistic layers scream this truth. Germans,Britanians,Balkanian and Slavs have light-colored broad round facial structure like Uralic and Turkic peoples. Later, they mixed with the Caucasian and Semitic peoples and got a square facial structure and a dark color. Put that in your empty mind.Turks never lived in the Manchuria. We have nothing to do with there. Chinese sources wrote that Turks migrated from Khazar(Caspian) Sea to Northern western China. Euroasian Steppes are ours !!! . The affinity between the Ural and Turkic peoples is much greater than the affinity between the Turkic and Mongolian,Manchurian,Tungusian peoples. Turkic history start from Anav,Andranova,Afenesyova,Okunev and other cultures since 8000 years ago. Stop stealing our history. Stop talking about history and especially,Asian and Turkic histories.
WRONG: the location of Chagatai Turkic should be west of Uighur language. As always some random turkish (who doesn’t know his background ) decides to create another fuuuck up
К вопросу об идиотских утверждениях о невозможности монгольских завоеваний. Просто это был кратковременный монгольский переворот в тюркском мире, преимущественно степном и кочевом.
@@CCMapping The Huns even say to themselves that they are Turks, how can you say this? Their president said that we are Turks too and they are even observer members of the Turk Union Formation. You can research
I really hated this kind of language and ethnic maps. People in many places speak 2 or 3 languages. And ethnicities overlap each other. Russian is a Kazakh language, because Kazakhs do speak Russian. Kazakh is a "Russian" language because many Russian citizens are Ethnic Kazakhs! And about 2 million ethnic Russians and Tatars live in Kazakhstan. How can we map that out? There's very large Kazakh community in Astrakhan, which is in Russia. And equally very large Russian community in Almaty which is in Kazakhstan. And also we got all the Stans countries population in the Khabarovsk and Yakutia regions of Russia, living side by side with local Russians and Asian Russians. To do this kind of map looks very deceiving and inaccurate I can say.
A few yellow people conquered some Persians and made them use this language. These Persians conquered the Armenians and Caucasians, and then they formed an army to conquer the Greeks and Balkans. History is very interesting.
@@denetim1 Iran's yellow genes come from the Mongolian army in the 13th century. Because the Mongolian army killed almost all the men in Khwarezm. The paternal genes of Anatolian yellow people are about 5-8%. The Turkified Armenians (Ottomans) conquered the Christian Greeks in Anatolia, and every year a large number of children were sent from Balkan villages to be language and Islamized. Genetic tests show that more than 90% of modern Turks are Greek and Balkan people.
Where the hell did you get that Turks were yellow? One of the earliest records about the appearance of Turks is from Al - Istakhri's notes and he says Turks were a handome people with fair skin. Blue eyes and reddish hair being common traits among them. He was refering to Khazars, and the Seljuks who established the Turkish dominance in Anatolia were a branch of Khazars. We have much lighter skin than both Greeks and Armenians.
In the past, there was no place called Mongolia, its name was Tian Shan Mountains, Ötügen, the ancient capital of the Turks, is now in Mongolia, but as I said, the first definition of Mongolia came with Genghis Khan.
Did the Turks fuck your mother? Ninety percent of those who are Turkophobic are the grandchildren of the concubines who went to the Turkish Palaces. Are you Greek, Slav, Persian or Kurdish? Stop being racist, dude
Ru's book in chine before jesus 1300 bc our name was Tu-ve-chi for Ru.. so those people were speakin nothing before 200? :D atleast last research works yes attila was speakin like us and no not turks europeans foundation so..
@@msitso bırakın bizim sahte olduğumuzu düşünsünler, yunanlar içinde bile Türkçe konuşan ve yunan alfabesi kullanan Türkler vardı bunun için çok kızgınlar
hi, but the territory of the Sakha Republic is larger than the territory of Kazakhstan. Sakha 3103.2 thousand km², Kazakhstan 2724.9 thousand km². and before the annexation of the USSR, the territory was even larger. we are direct descendants of the Huns.
Love Sakha Sire from Turkiye/ Qazaxstan
@@unknownmf2599 Love you my KyekTurks brothers too
Анексия)))) СССР ваши жопы мыл чтоб якутия существовало спокойно ей нужно хотябы иметь весь дальний восток а иначе условия загубят в общем ваша судьба всю жизнь быть с Россией
Saxa is pronounced Yeka by surrounding ethnos, right? On old maps it’s written Yeka Mongols. We say Žeke in Qazaq. We are both Moghuls. Modern Mongolians are Khitans.
@@Qazaq_Qiyat_1465 they pronounced yak because they couldn’t pronounce the letter S. it’s the same as the Kazakhs pronouncing Žeke because the Kazakhs pronounce Ž. we are not yeke and not zeke. we are SAKHA its meaning white(solar)
Good video, well made👍🏻
I love the video but would it be possible to add music?
Mabye? idk
@@CCMapping, please. That would be perfect
Great video keep up the great work I found your channel via this video from TH-cam recommendation .
Thanks, I hope you like it!
Proto Turkic cultures started west of baikal and north of beijing to be exact. What yo ustated is not wrong but it's the date of the slabgrave culture.
VERY NICE VIDEO!!!!!!!
Ok good to know
Wasnt slabgrave culture theory completely debunked as it has nothing tondo with proto-turks but protomongolics?
Azerbaijani language used in Safavid and Qajar dynasty. Of course their offical language is persian. But azerbaijani is still important language. For example azerbaijani used in Safavid army , court more than persian.
Nice video by the way
Yeah but the vernacular was still Persian
No
Enough to misinform people, in those days there was no language of science, official, state, there was no such thing! such divisions began only in the 20th century.
qajars literally sold azerbijan to the russians to fund one of their parties stfu
the language of the safavid army, court of the king, and the language even the king (shah ismail) wrote poetry in was persian. The title of the king of safavi was "Shah" instead of the turkic "sultaan". The word "azarbijan" is persian, "azar" being old persian for "fire" and "bijan" meaning defended by.
deliberately problematic information.
You deliberately ignored Southern Azerbaijan, which shows the closeness of this channel to Persian fascism. Azerbaijani Turks, the founders of Iran, still live in Southern Azerbaijan with a population of 40 million.
No, I showed south Azerbaijanis in the video. And no, Azerbaijanis did not found Iran, they came 1000s of years after Persia was founded.
they are literally on the map tf are u blabbing about
Yeah lol they are on the map and IN IRAN
I'm Sakha(Yakut) 🙋♂️
Cool
Uruy
What is the meaning of the name sakha? Does it mean edge or side? Yaka means edge in turkish
@@TechHistory17 Nice one, but - No.
Your «Yaka» is «Sağa» for us.
Ancient turkic: «Saqa»
Ancient mongolic: «Zaqa»
This name came to us TOO in ancient times. Therefore, officially according to legend “supposedly” means «Clean», «White», «Sunny».
(Ancient turkic: Sağ² - Crystal Clean)
But in our language it can be translated in a variety of ways.
1. «Saq saqattan» - Since the beginning.
Implied as people born at the origins.
2. «Saq»³ - Moment in time/Time interval.
Implies as people living at a modern time.
3. «Saq»² - Expression of Disappointment/Dissatisfaction/Renunciation.
Implied that the Sakhas were renounced from Mongol Khanates several hundred centuries ago. Possibly during the time of the Kurıkans (ancestors of Sakha).
Interesting translations.
Ancient turkic:
Saq¹ - Healthy, prosperous,
Saq⁵ - Intelligence, wit, ingenuity
İ am 🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷
Ajem Turkish🇦🇿🐺🤘🏻
Nice video
Biz ozbek oguzmiz salam hamma turk dunyasina ❤❤🇺🇿🇹🇲🇰🇿🇰🇬🇦🇿🇹🇷
I'm from Vietnam 🇻🇳. Nice video! 👍
Cool, glad you liked it
🐺🇹🇷👍❤️🇰🇿🐺
GIGA TURAN lol
Gotta get that Hungary in, y’know the Turkic one
Gokturk edits be like:
@@CCMapping
In fact Turan is Persian Word and has nothing to do with Turks
Ok
Very well.
Yes
I like your religion map
Why did the Bashkirs appear on the map only in 1400? They were described by Ibn Fadlan in 922.
You're right, the Oghuzs are mentioned in Byzantine sources in the 520s, and that too is missing, the video is a bit lacking.
u might think,im weird,but i think vise versa... in the map,bulgar and chuvash seem to be the last turkic languages developing among the ural altay turkic family tree... no... the ancient proto bulgar and chuvash language is the oldest i think,and it dates back long before sumer... since in sumerian chuvash,old hungarian word formation and assimilation takes place...there is an article from two greek scholars who classify chuvash the oldest turkic language,because it is closely related to some sumer structures... also most hungarian scholars state that chuvash effected hungarian,and also chuvash,hungarian,sumerian,tatar, mongolian word comparisons were made,and it turns out,chuvash is the leader out of these,and most bulgar,tatar,mongolian,sumer words derive from chuvash... its at least some 5000 years old,because sumerian is at least 4000 years old...
Yeah… and Uzo Aztecan and Turkic have similar words too, and are they related?
@@CCMapping its known that azteks and similiar indian tribes have the same common ancestor w the turks from central asia before they split...most probably tens of thousands of years ago
@@nukhetyavuz yeah, but everyone today has a common ancestor with someone in central Africa so does that mean every language is related?
@@CCMapping its not that way...ive been comparing these languages for years...nothing is coincidences...apropos languages...the atabaskans and several other native americans are known to have agglutinative languages,most probably these languages first were formed in siberia,stretching from the urals to the altays,and the native indians had common words like kan or tepe which are related to a common ancestor...later todays languages were formed,but they have the same logic,the same scaffolding...
@@nukhetyavuzwell there’s only so many sounds and words to go around so obviously there’s gonna be similarities in different languages
Can you make history of serbian languages plssssss
I did Slavic but Serbian is not a family
@@CCMapping oh ok
@@CCMapping Sorry
Is ok
@@CCMapping Thanks
Proto Turks came from Manchuria and we were then in Mongolia/Siberia/Altai. Still good video.
This is all wrong. Proto Turkish didnot started in Asia. It originated from Africa and found a place to hide in Central Asia. When you study the Lidya , Prig, Ancient Greek or Tamil language there are many Turkish words in them. Especially the place names.
I’m dying 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
The Turks were also in India
Yeah but it was spoken by very few
@@CCMapping No, there were The White Huns (Hephthalites), The Ghaznavids, The Delhi Sultanate, and The Empire of Babur = They were all Turkic
They spoke bactrian though.
But they were of Turkic ethnicity, just not language.
@@CCMapping but NOT all of them spoke the Bactrian language... / Today, even the name of the "Urdu" language came from the Turkish word "ordu" = army
Orta Asya’da devasa bir Türk devlet olması gerekiyor türkün Türkten başka dostu yoktur diyerekten büyütüldük ama bakıyorum ki en büyük düşman da kendimize biz yapmışız bu kadar farklı devlet nasıl kurulabilir
Sovyet ihtilali başında Türkistan ssr vardı zaten Lenin öldükten sonra sovyet yönetimi bölerek günümüzdeki haline getirdi bugün orada tek Türkistan değil 4 ayrı devlet olması sovyetlerin eseridir
Im KARAKALPAK
Cool
Source : @ss of the europeans.
@@Tengristshaman what?
@@CCMapping Who do you think you are, to assign us 2,200 years and yourselves 5,000-10,000 years? Who gave you permission to talk about history and especially about us?
The Turks are hypothesized to originate in Manchuria, but the evidence suggests there were a mix of Turks and other peoples and the modern Turks originated after the Xiongnu fell about 2,200 years ago and the Turks borrowed nomadic lifestyle from Iranians and Europeans to expand.
@@CCMapping Now, in your dreams, do you want to take us out of Altai and imprison us in Manchuria? I can't find words for your impudence and courage. Do you want to call us mixed and thieves and take over our geography and culture? If we ask Europeans, they will say that we own everything also Bing Bang include. Therefore, it is absurd to take you seriously. Stop pseudo mythical fantasies.Wake up from sleep. Only Europeans like slavic, germanic,british people talk about the fantastical hypothesis. Because these nations have no history, culture, or written literature. They try to cover up their incompetence and put their own thief characters on the others. Supposedly all civilisations are Northern Europeans origin.You have nothing that is why you thief Germans, Slavs,Britanians,Balkanians are busy stealing the history of the Turks, the history of the Near East, and the history of the Uralic,Caucasian,Dravidian peoples. You have nothing to do with ancient history, culture, or civilization. Germans,Britanians,Balkanian and Slavians are mutated communities from the Uralic and Turkic peoples. Genetic, Anthropological, Cultural traditions, Religion,Epics,Mythologies and Linguistic layers scream this truth. Germans,Britanians,Balkanian and Slavs have light-colored broad round facial structure like Uralic and Turkic peoples. Later, they mixed with the Caucasian and Semitic peoples and got a square facial structure and a dark color.
Put that in your empty mind.Turks never lived in the Manchuria. We have nothing to do with there. Chinese sources wrote that Turks migrated from Khazar(Caspian) Sea to Northern western China.
Euroasian Steppes are ours !!! . The affinity between the Ural and Turkic peoples is much greater than the affinity between the Turkic and Mongolian,Manchurian,Tungusian peoples.
Turkic history start from Anav,Andranova,Afenesyova,Okunev and other cultures since 8000 years ago. Stop stealing our history. Stop talking about history and especially,Asian and Turkic histories.
VERY NICE😍🤩
I hear sound from my in "russia, iranian and china collapse!"
I am Muslim
@@SheikhHassanIbnSham cool
WRONG: the location of Chagatai Turkic should be west of Uighur language. As always some random turkish (who doesn’t know his background ) decides to create another fuuuck up
I showed it west of Uyghur
К вопросу об идиотских утверждениях о невозможности монгольских завоеваний. Просто это был кратковременный монгольский переворот в тюркском мире, преимущественно степном и кочевом.
Шикарная Карта
Thx for 69 subscribers
неправильно что кыргызов вы выводите в 13 веке, имя, этнос Кыргыз официально на арену выходить в 3веке до нашей эры в китайских источниках.
Yeah but I had to use it anachronistically
Nice
turkmeneli turkish?
It is there as Turkmen
@@CCMapping no, that's an Iraqi turkmens?
nuh uh clearly turkic languages started on the moon!!!!!!!
Lol
Get the history of Iranian languages
I already covered that
Тюрки мощь
Turkic begins in mongol
Turk abi/ japonic ani
Автор у вас ошибка. Прототюрки= кыргызы и хунну. Енисейские тюрки это и есть кыргызы, потомки кыргызов хунну
The hunnic language is still disputed if it is in Turkic or other language families
Виват Чувашия-Булгария
Karakalpakstan
Bu davlatlarku 😁😁😁
Ok
Where Hungary?
Omg it is not Turkic or even Altaic
@@CCMappingas far as İ can remember that language closer to finnish or something like that
yes it is Uralic like Finnish, not turkic
Uralic People
@@CCMapping The Huns even say to themselves that they are Turks, how can you say this? Their president said that we are Turks too and they are even observer members of the Turk Union Formation. You can research
I really hated this kind of language and ethnic maps. People in many places speak 2 or 3 languages. And ethnicities overlap each other. Russian is a Kazakh language, because Kazakhs do speak Russian. Kazakh is a "Russian" language because many Russian citizens are Ethnic Kazakhs! And about 2 million ethnic Russians and Tatars live in Kazakhstan. How can we map that out? There's very large Kazakh community in Astrakhan, which is in Russia. And equally very large Russian community in Almaty which is in Kazakhstan. And also we got all the Stans countries population in the Khabarovsk and Yakutia regions of Russia, living side by side with local Russians and Asian Russians. To do this kind of map looks very deceiving and inaccurate I can say.
The maps are just supposed to show how languages evolved and where they are spoken most.
A few yellow people conquered some Persians and made them use this language. These Persians conquered the Armenians and Caucasians, and then they formed an army to conquer the Greeks and Balkans. History is very interesting.
I have no idea what you're talking about.
@@Sadoyasturadoglu nobody has an idea what he is talking
Yes, the yellow tribe in the video is Oguz, that's why there is a very large proto Oguz-Turkish DNA in Iran, even in the Greeks and the Balkans.
@@denetim1 Iran's yellow genes come from the Mongolian army in the 13th century. Because the Mongolian army killed almost all the men in Khwarezm. The paternal genes of Anatolian yellow people are about 5-8%. The Turkified Armenians (Ottomans) conquered the Christian Greeks in Anatolia, and every year a large number of children were sent from Balkan villages to be language and Islamized. Genetic tests show that more than 90% of modern Turks are Greek and Balkan people.
Where the hell did you get that Turks were yellow? One of the earliest records about the appearance of Turks is from Al - Istakhri's notes and he says Turks were a handome people with fair skin. Blue eyes and reddish hair being common traits among them. He was refering to Khazars, and the Seljuks who established the Turkish dominance in Anatolia were a branch of Khazars.
We have much lighter skin than both Greeks and Armenians.
Khazaria 🤬
Worst mapping I have ever seen
Would you mind elaborating?
See this video explains turks are from Mongolia
So?Do you wanna say turkic peoples are mongolian?
What
Turks are not from Mongolia, they originated just west of mongolia
In the past, there was no place called Mongolia, its name was Tian Shan Mountains, Ötügen, the ancient capital of the Turks, is now in Mongolia, but as I said, the first definition of Mongolia came with Genghis Khan.
They have same roots like mongolians
Hisyory of animals
Did the Turks fuck your mother? Ninety percent of those who are Turkophobic are the grandchildren of the concubines who went to the Turkish Palaces. Are you Greek, Slav, Persian or Kurdish? Stop being racist, dude
I'm not a Turk, but Turks are the people who suffer the most racism and are the most patient in the world, you are seriously a son of b3tch and ahraz.
like you?
Wow, more nationalist Turks? So unexpected 🤣🤣
Probably a European who calls himself civilized:
2492 BC ARMENIA 🇦🇲🇦🇲🇦🇲🇦🇲🇦🇲🇦🇲🇦🇲🇦🇲
Since when a de-facto country located in Western-Azerbaijan had an history?
Ru's book in chine before jesus 1300 bc our name was Tu-ve-chi for Ru.. so those people were speakin nothing before 200? :D atleast last research works yes attila was speakin like us and no not turks europeans foundation so..
Ne diyon aq? Google translate yap en azından
fake türkce anadolu dan orta asyaya yayildi
What the hell are you talking about?
come to Chuvashia and say it in face to locals. you greeco-persian muslim🇹🇷
Wtf 💀💀💀
I own turkey
@@msitso bırakın bizim sahte olduğumuzu düşünsünler, yunanlar içinde bile Türkçe konuşan ve yunan alfabesi kullanan Türkler vardı bunun için çok kızgınlar