pBS is complete leftist spin and so is Reuters. If you want real news try sky news Australia or Russian Times Western news media is beholden to the uni party The leftist have largely taken over media. MSNBC, ABC, CBS, and WaPo/Huffpo along with TDS(PBS) all push the same leftist tripe FOX news is controlled opposition designed to "cater" to the "right" All you have to do is check their "views" On abortion Feminism Masculinity Climate change Ice vehicles Taxes Israel Gaza war Ukraine/Russia conflict Capitalism Big tech And you'll see they're all in lockstep just like they were with the "plandemic" If you don't subscribe to their rhetoric like the "COVID-19" situation You're a Xxxxx denier Conspiracy theorist Far right extremist Or some kind of "phobe" It's useless to consult such people on anything more than the current ambient air temperature
If CNN actually wanted, "News News," as they say they do, there's no need to court political interests on either side. All you have to do is present factual and unbiased information. The problem is that the attempts to return to 'The Center' aren't actually driven by journalistic integrity, they're driven by a desire for a wider consumer audience and higher ratings and people on *both sides* of the spectrum know pandering like this when they see it.
Excellent point the problem of bringing more viewership together with unbiased informations. Therein lies the problem because the truth is in 9 of 10 times something you will not like. Which brings up the real question: Is the profit-motive compatible with the news-sector?
@@AaronOkeanos "Is the profit-motive compatible with the news-sector?" Comparing to what? I'm watching how after each election in my country tax funded TV is having management replaced, for the one that shares views of newly elected government. I also watched how a few foreign "independent" news channels, were a very expensive way of expressing strong bias of local unelected establishment. There is a different problem with not for profit system - assuming that quality is high, people should willing to pay for such content and it should be self financing, possibly profitable. If you have to force them to pay, then you most likely know the answer concerning value for money.
Having been in essence a super PAC for several years they needed to clear the air for anyone but the hard left to consider them news and be share information with them.
The kids don't care. CNN and Fox are so 20th Century...(20th Century Fox = pun) Trump was 2016. AND BIG TV was really just BIG OIL. Elon Musk had a shot but he lost his mind.
24/7 news isn’t going to die. It’s simply going to migrate to your phone. I mean it kinda has already. Every day your going to get blitz with notifications and see news compete with your normal content. Honestly, it’s not going to get better
I agree. The news has become nothing but lies. We cancelled our cable and don't miss the crap, a bit. The charges cable expects a person to pay, is insane. They are robbing all of us.
Especially when they're telling us there are 700+ human Gender and a person can be identified as animal, hard pass. Indoctrination network will damage viewers psychological well being.
@@MidwestArtMan I'm 43. It was much better. I'd watch it every morning before work. That is how I saw what was happening, as it was all happening on 9/11. I watched the news before then too.
As a Canadian, CNN used to be my go to for American news. After this recent Trump debacle, they've completely lost me. I will never take CNN seriously again after that.
You could have shortened this entire broadcast by just saying the reason why their viewership is down and the reason why they're losing is because they're dishonest now if you had said that you could have shortened this up to one or two minutes
If centrism is the inability to criticise one or even both sides failings, that isn't serious journalism, it is pandering. Neutrality is to tell anybody when they fucked up. Serious journalism is to discover that investigatively, not just report on it when others do. The ultimate goal of journalism is to check the work of the politicians so that their actual achievements and failures are known to the voting public. Well that, and similar things in non-politics news segments.
truth isn't centrism or neutrality- cnn became a half truth teller- a news model that doesn't age well. fox, cnn and msnbc got/are getting what they deserved and swallowed
I agree and I think that this video conflates two aspects of CNN’s attempted shift. On one hand, they tried (or at least said they would try) to focus more on fact-based reporting rather than featuring tons of opinion content or constantly bashing Trump. On the other, they tried to capture right leaning tv watchers by firing more prominent trump critics and making content they thought those watchers would like. Those two goals aren’t the same. One aims to focus on featuring the most important stories in a straight analysis-free manner. The other panders to a viewing demographic.
I'm 66 years old and even I get it; why waste money on cable? I killed mine 5 1/2 years ago. That's a little more that $13,000 that i saved over the years.
People are shockingly dumb. And people are far more interested in the narrative that best represents their biased beliefs. The truth would actually unite both the right and left against the people in power.
Journalistic problems are caused by the journalists. CNN needs to get rid of some very lame commentators. They filled some key positions with very biased people.
It would be like if an Oakland TV station brought back every story to how it affects the Raiders footballl team. If they talked about how an apartment fire was going to cause the team to be sad, and underperform in next week's game. How the increase in drug use was focused around weekdays, because obviously people enjoy watching the Raiders more than shooting up. How the increase in new housing construction was a boon for the team as it would add fans. Like, we just want the info, not the unrelated analysis of how it will help a (political) sportsbal team.
Let’s be real. CNN is NOT failing because the audience is media literate and therefore reject its superficial reporting. The audience in general are more partisan and thirst for outrage and sensationalism. CNN doesn’t know how to serve this audience. And because it’s a corporate oil tanker, it cannot change direction. It cannot adapt. It lacks agility. Big money, big names, big debts, and no one is willing to make changes for fear of affecting the share price. Too big to succeed
Honestly I don't even think that's right either. People want propaganda that reinforces their views, the fact that Faux news (and more recently the newer even more radically right wing Cable news channel competitor) have both done so well for so long proves it. CNN should have just embraced being called too liberal and tried to compete with MSNBC if they wanted to improve their ratings.
It's *2023.* Young people just don't watch TV that much anymore. Heck, I was born in '88, and I pretty much never watch television. Everything is online.
Yes, but that's a big problem. You know why? Because we'll be getting our news from who knows where? At least with news networks you could know who owns them. Do you know who owns any YT channel? Who is giving money to content creators? In some cases yes, but not all. Then, Bob the TH-camr won't be getting press credentials at the White House, so he's unlikely to have access to get interviews with presidents and prime-ministers. Last, but not least, probably the biggest problem: bubbles. Online is a medium that favours the creation of bubbles. We will never see what news other sides are getting in their bubble and it has happened to me to see someone comment: what about X? And I would be thinking... WTF is X? What are you talking about? The general public needs a baseline of common information/knowledge to have a functional debate across party lines. Otherwise, considering the bubbles, we'll look at one another like we're crazy, not knowing what the other side knows. Division is deeper when this common foundation doesn't exist and for all their faults, cable news media could provide that. Online media, like YT channels, can't really do that. There are big TH-camrs that I've never, ever heard of, channels with millions of followers, but being outside of my bubble, I wouldn't know. And the same goes for everyone. The internet and social media are too disjointed and decentralized to get a complete picture.
If cable tv bills were paid a-la-carte (meaning consumers only pay for the channels they want to watch) the way they should be, you would see 95% of channels evaporate overnight. The cream rises to the top.
@@ericcrawford8308Waaa waaa. Funny how Fox is still successful, whereas your limpdick organisations are tanking. Maybe woke bullshit isn't as popular as you want it to be...
No , Fox does have more facts to back. Their news app than CNN ever did ,not that fox is right all the time but way more correct with their news and CNN
@@ericcrawford8308I completely agree w/u. CNN, MSNBC, ABC, CBS etc all of these news sites EXCEPT for FOX NEWS tell the truth. If u watch them ur not going to hear lies. Here’s just a couple examples: ▪️Fox News claimed that VP Harris had ordered copies of her children’s book to be gifted to migrant children at a Department of Health and Human Services shelter in CA. This was not based on facts & the story was retracted but the misinfo was already out there. ▪️Fox News claimed President Biden is coming for our burgers 🫤 🍔 claiming that Biden’s administration would require Americans to radically reduce the amount of red-meat that they eat due to Biden's climate policy. This is NOT TRUE. Cmon there is truth & there is fiction. At least the other stations don’t blatantly lie about the craziest things! ▪️Do we even want to get into the settlement Fox News agreed to do they didn’t have to go to court w/Dominion which is a much smaller company then Fox. They were sued for DEFAMATION & btw if I were Hunter Biden I would sue Fox News too! He didn’t choose to work in his Daddy’s cabinet like Jared & Ivanka so he should’ve be scrutinized like he’s a public figure. The GOP & Fox care more about his nudes & I start wondering why is that 🤔
There’s nothing wrong with opinion programming as long as you can differentiate the between news and opinion. CNN as well as most establishment media has failed to do that. That’s why they’ve lost credibility and podcast and independent journalism has flourished.
All news is opinions even if you think it looks nicer and sounds nicer or is less abrasive than the traditional media it is still opinions. Your opinion can change which aspects of a topic that are reported which can completely change a news story. Go read a news article on something that you're an expert in from a source that you claim to trust and tell me that it's not an opinion
You're confusing opinions with bias. All news is biased, although some agencies try harder than others to reduce the impact of that bias. News, however, is not opinion. Opinion requires no verification or fact-checking, whereas news does. It's why Fox is so dangerous, because it presents it's opinions in a news format, and never explicitly state that it isn't news (except when threatened with lawsuits) so people think their opinions are true.
No. They've lost credibility because malevolent bad-faith actors have organized and worked hard to discredit them. You know what else has "lost credibility" the same way in these years? Teachers, fact-checkers, doctors and literal fucking **science.**
That’s one of the biggest problems I see with US journalism today. The first newspaper I read regularly had an opinion section clearly marked and on separate pages. Obviously no journalism is completely pure news without any opinion, even just selecting which stories to report is an inherently biased thing. But they tried their best to report as neutrally as possible on the news, didn’t use biased words there etc.
The difference with the "cable news" networks is 100% of their programming is political opinion. The 3 prime networks have "news" segments at specific time slots, with talk shows, game shows, and varieties of drama and comedy genres. News papers certainly have political party leanings, but they also have straightforward reporting in sports and lifestyle interests topics. The cable guys are just lying by calling themselves "news".
Zucker getting fired was no loss for CNN Just the opposite in fact since he was the architect of making the network only appeal to the relatively small group of the population that is hard-left
Personally I think moving towards the center and focusing on facts doesn’t necessarily mean appeasing both parties. It means objectively reporting regardless of whether either side thinks it’s fair
Of course it does. But when one side consistently lies or is wrong much more often, then “neutral” gets accused of picking sides. Neutral only works if both sides are equally right and wrong at most times. Too often I see people try to be neutral when the actual facts are one sided.
If anything everyone would like the news less. There's a reason the news is like this, it's more profitable. People are way more willing to sit and watch someone tell them what they want to hear.
@@twelvecatsinatrenchcoat Bingo. Welcome to the agendemic! Post Bush-era so began the sideism media pit of: echo chambers, cherry picking, white knighting, sjw, anti jw, one-off examples used to paint massive murals of fuzzy pictures, and rallying and rowdying the herds through divisive, clickbait, edgy, and manipulated sludge. Oh there was a gay picture book left by an 8th grade troll in a library shelf? 'The entire school system is broken by horrific libs and queers down to the core!! Oh someone called a teenage Afam "boy" behind a register in Alabama? 'This plague of racism is only spinning worse out of control by the hands of privelaged white americans!' (Totally not uneducated idiots as the most common problem... & Not just 1/100th, of .01%, of a 1/200 urban county, in 1/50 states are those 2 one-off schools the issue, in a nation of 700million+ people...) But now suddenly, everybody grabs their pitchforks and rallies behind their echo chamber herd, and spins up overarching blanket issues out of thin air as stances to hate for and love one another over. This is why I live happily in the mountains outside of an urban area. No politics up here, and all of my neighbors get along with one another, in likely a 60/40 R/D split, by which data supports also.
I don't think traditional news media should expect to make a huge profit when they are there to push political agenda of their shareholders. That being said I don't mean this necessarily hurt their neutrality and credibility, but it is incredibly naive to expect any news outlets, TLDR News included, don't have a political agenda to make in their shows.
Thank you. There is no such thing as “unbiased” news. It has been harmful for decades to pretend it is something that exists much less is somehow superior and therefore desirable to attain.
You'd have to define 'political agenda'. Media orgs in general may lean left or right or may even favour certain political parties, but usually won't fully stand behind them. The EIC or manager can curtail some heat from a big news story, but if something newsworthy happens to a political party, they're usually on it like flies on shit. Then of course you have the usual tenets that many news orgs abide by, don't be racist, don't be a bigot, etc, and I don't know how many people would call that a 'political agenda' nowadays.
The last time I watched CNN was during the coverage of the Trump vs. Clinton election in 2016. When Trump's victory was announced, CNN journalists had a nervous breakdown. It was the most unprofessional thing I had ever seen on television. The bias so was obvious. I decided that day that I would never watch CNN again, not because I supported one candidate over the other, but because it became obvious to me that CNN was an unprofessional company, and that this type of company would not report the news, but create the news to their liking. And time just proved I was right. I don't think I will EVER watch CNN again.
I used to watch CNN on a daily basis but stopped around 2021. I stopped watching the news so much in general. I got tired of the rage inducing headlines everyday. It was not good for my mental health. I still like to keep up with the news by subscribing to neutral news channels like tldr.
Those rage inducing headlines were bad for the mental health of the nation. So many people died from lack of socialization and from lack of exercise during lockdowns and from stress caused by the actions of corporate media and politicians. "You should be afraid." - CNN, October 2020.
Same. I prefer short summaries of important things that happened during the week, because tgere is just too much noise that I won't remember even in an hour since reading about it.
@@purplespeckledappleeater8738well unfortunately we had every reason to be afraid because an unhinged lunatic was running the country and had no interest in actually addressing the problem presented by the pandemic. And we could tell it was like a toddler was in charge
@@angelainamarie9656 And the Biden Administration are not behaving like unhinged lunatics? Have you been following the Hunter Biden trials? The Biden Administration is legally incompetent without the protection of the DOJ. Calling a man so wealthy he can fund his own elections without having to make backroom deals for political donations a toddler is shoddy backwards-thinking logic. Most politicians only become millionaires after becoming politicians, thus become plugged into a political machine that many Americans endearingly refer to as "The Swamp". You came up with a bad regurgitated excuse for why someone you don't like is bad instead of listing something they actually did. Trump did address the pandemic through organizing the vaccines and recommending hydroxychloroquine and organizing efforts to manufacture domestic medical supplies for use during the pandemic. I worked in 2020 building hazmat and ventilator packs under the Trump initiative while the US outbid other countries for critically needed medical supplies after China went into lockdown. There is evidence China may have had their leak as early as August of 2019 and were intentionally flying individuals with COVID around the world thus spreading the virus. The first cities in the US to get COVID were New York, LA, and Seattle who refused to shut down initially. In Seattle they knew of a mystery illness and did not report it to the CDC, thus spreading the virus. Leftist mainstream media also confused how to safeguard against COVID all through the Summer of 2020 for months with nonsensical recommendations such as wearing multiple masks that led to people passing out from lack of oxygen, which causes brain damage and lying about the lethality of the virus while simultaneously promoting people go out into the streets of cities to riot, thus spreading the disease. COVID reached the state of Georgia after an African American family from Atlanta had a huge funeral with hundreds of people and many infected people then spread the virus. Democrats did a lot to spread COVID and make the pandemic far worse than it had to be for years including laying off essential workers and military personnel while violating human rights and Constitutional rights. Containing a pandemic risks isolating the disease and creating new variants, meaning the Democrats made the disease mutate through lockdowns. Many Americans didn't die of COVID but died from lockdowns and isolation, became homeless, and mental illness and drug abuse skyrocketed as did violence and crime. CNN was continuously looping overinflated COVID statistics and Trump rallies back-to-back and repeating "you should be afraid" before the election. The Democrats spent $14 billion calling Trump and Republicans racists through propaganda. In Detroit we had literal billboards calling Trump a racist and racial advertising targeting specific voting demographics.
Same here-it seemed like Anderson and Company was and likely still is on a mission to light fires under their audience’s collective ass, to keep them at the edge of their seats!
In Vietnam, first time in over a month I turned on my TV again and CNN disappear from the list of channel and I am glad. Not sure if its a global trend or only here. Occationally whenever I watch news on TV, only DW but never CNN
I find it ironic that journalists, people who are full of themselves and think they are in a position to educate (indoctrinate) others are the very last people to realize just how irrelevant they've become.
In my opinion, the established press has killed itself by every year progressing more towards bringing the news babyboomers want to see to get their feelings confirmed, rather than trying to be a relatively neutral and objective channel that brings wisdom through facts.
The babyboomers are the ones more likely to watch old media news and so they're trying to get a piece of that demo pie. Not sure how that'll work though, it's not like Fox News is gonna disappear and those viewers already hate CNN, they've now alienated what audience they have, and MSNBC is probably gobbling up more of that marketshare already. Warner Brothers Discovery is making some weird moves.
I mean, younger people are watching biased TH-cam content instead. TH-cam’s political news (more like commentary) is a mess. The only difference is cable news is massive decline. The market for more neutral news like TLDR is relatively small.
I remember growing up not knowing the political leanings of any of the newspeople. - Even on CNN. Not saying they were totally impartial. Just that they at least attempted to remain impartial to some degree. Crazy, right?
Yea they are always trying to the o tell us what we re seeing when that ain't what we re seeing at all like MSeeNBC censors trump when he s talking to th
Brianna hosts in the afternoons while Jim anchors on the weekends. Not all timeslots are viewer magnets, are they? Still, that is far from being fired.
Bingo. Welcome to the agendemic! Post Bush-era so began the sideism media pit of: echo chambers, cherry picking, white knighting, sjw, anti jw, one-off examples used to paint massive murals of fuzzy pictures, and rallying and rowdying the herds through divisive, clickbait, edgy, and manipulated sludge. Oh there was a gay picture book left by an 8th grade troll in a library shelf? 'The entire school system is broken by horrific libs and queers down to the core!! Oh someone called a teenage Afam "boy" behind a register in Alabama? 'This plague of racism is only spinning worse out of control by the hands of privelaged white americans!' (Totally not uneducated idiots as the most common problem... & Not just 1/100th, of .01%, of a 1/200 urban county, in 1/50 states are those 2 one-off schools the issue, in a nation of 700million+ people...) But now suddenly, everybody grabs their pitchforks and rallies behind their echo chamber herd, and spins up overarching blanket issues out of thin air as stances to hate for and love one another over. This is why I live happily in the mountains outside of an urban area. No politics up here, and all of my neighbors get along with one another, in likely a 60/40 R/D split, by which data supports also.
Based on the fact that among his viewers there are both people who disdain CNN for being far left echo chamber and for daring to once invite Trump, TLDR is reasonable job at not being specially biased.
Its is NEVER possible to have unbiased neutral news. Even if you are outside the system you are going to have your own beliefs which may make inclined toward a side.
Insane how much traditional news viewership dropped after Trump left office. It's not just the fault of traditional news media - we were all addicted to the outrage. I'm encouraged that most of my friends and I are sick of it and hungry for centrism, facts, and cross-aisle collaboration.
Ah, so now that the far left has achieved power by crushing people's skulls (Officer Dorn) and dominating the public square during the CHOP/CHAZ Summer of Love, you're sick of it and hungry for centrism and cross aisle collaboration?
ABC news is owned by disney. My wife and I gave up on watching it when the purchase was made. I don't know which is worse 1 crazy rich owner or the biased employees of a giant company, who don't even own massive amounts of the company's stock, using the power of the company to force news organization to tow their personal lines.
CNN isn't all that significant around the world. Just cos it's American doesn't automatically make it the world news. It's almost entirely American news, from an American perspective, for American audiences. This bias, which it shares with its rivals Fox and the rest btw, is its most common - and normalized - form of bias, which is entirely taken for granted by its audience as they themselves mostly hail from America and see things the same way. It's not even considered political, but it very much is.
It is downright disgusting. And in the case of CNN, it leaves traditional viewers disoriented and dismayed seeing this lurch towards the GOP. And in the run up to 2024! MSNBC is my new home.
People wants to be given actual facts and truth and then be left to make their own decisions based off that, not to be told what to think by biased coverage and a networks paid for opinion.
@@twelvecatsinatrenchcoat As long as he doesn't claim to be a journalist and makes it very clear he has a side than its okay, The true danger are people who claim to be independent journalist who are in reality activist who only present the news in ways that help their side and hurt the other side
Americans ought to know there are alternatives. DW News is a German, publicly owned international news channel that broadcasts in English. France 24 is a French, publicly owned international news channel that broadcasts in English. Both cover US and international news, doing a much better job - in a calm, factual maner manner avoiding sensationalism. Oh and did l mention they almost never run ads?
@@ashleyfunnell9132 so you like dw news a state owned media which is miles better than cnn and fox , both privately owned. But you refuse to recognize the pattern in threse facts?
Imagine, as a so called "news" station not shoving your opinions down everyone's throats and actually just reporting the news from as neutral position...you know, like in the good old days.
@@LyricsFred You can go back to the 1800s and see the biased reporting easily. You would think the media would try to hide this if they do not want fix this. But in reality the media just doesnt care they just openly slam anyone that is not in agreement with them. The sad part is the way people do not see this.
As opposed to the 60's, 70's, 80's (before 24/7 BS), what we have now is blatant lying and gaslighting, as opposed to having just a very small degree of slanted nonsense b4 24/7 vomit-fest, even you can see that right? 😆 @@LyricsFred
The last chance for legacy media was the 1990's when media stopped Congress from mandating pay per channel. With cable soon to be gone, that's exactly what we are going to get. Pay per channel.
In a world where people won’t really listen to anyone with different ideas & views, it’s asking a lot to find a meeting in the middle. In a world where differing ideas are always met with name calling and labels. It’s tough. We used to have more of a “let’s agree to disagree” tone… ”I still respect you’re right to hold a different view.” Sadly, that world seems dead and gone.
Back in the day, they used to break up corporations that obtain too much control/power, but since our own government is guilty of the offense, it’s business as usual.
I take the most moderate and logical position; take information from all sides and you roughly could find the facts somewhere in the middle. I'm kinda surprise they mention the BBC and it's quite dumb to fully trust everything on BBC other than none political stuff. And talking about Trump, you're be surprise that people in the Gulf likes Trump more than other US president through my own experience (One main reason: He didn't start a war in the Middle East.)
The news used to be delivered with a clock on the wall and an unattractive man behind a big micreiphone . But you got the news. Today the studio looks like a movie set with glamorous women and an occasional man, all very smily face and full of laughter. They are more important than the news or the BS they are reading.
Please stop perpetuating overly simplistic notions of right-wing and left-wing media. I’m not sure you guys understand what “moving to the right” means. Switching toward more news over commentary and “moving right” are completely different things. France24 is news over commentary but they are not more right wing than CNN.
As an external observed, it looks more to me like the American Right has moved further to the right and CNN has remained exactly where it was issue-wise instead of CNN moving left. A shifting of the Overton Window.
@kylejacobson9587 The question is a shift starting from where on the right left range? As an European I can tell you CNN feels very much right in the center right now. So maybe it started out center-right I don't know. Of course many of the concepts that are deemed "radical left" in the US, like universal health care and gun laws are a staple of our system and are not considered left leaning at all, so maybe that's why it puzzles me. Just saying that to us your left/right scale seems all skewed right.
@@JohnDowson100 Left-Right is only a useful description within a country, and looses meaning the further you zoom out, the less comparable it gets. The American left is to the right of the European center on a variety of issues, such as the ones you listed. However there are areas where Europe is more right wing. For example, the Northern European states are generally recognized as regulating business less than the US. Also the American left is significantly to the left of Europe's left, generally, on issues of race, immigration, LGBTQ issues, and abortion(although, outside of Central Europe, the American right is likewise to the right of the right of most of Europe, there doesn't exist much middle on those issues)
@@JohnDowson100 Left-Right is only a useful description within a country, and looses meaning the further you zoom out, the less comparable it gets. The American left is to the right of the European center on a variety of issues, such as the ones you listed. However there are areas where Europe is more right wing. For example, the Northern European states are generally recognized as regulating business less than the US. Also the American left is significantly to the left of Europe's left, generally, on issues of race, immigration, LGBTQ issues, and abortion(although, outside of Central Europe, the American right is likewise to the right of the right of most of Europe, there doesn't exist much middle on those issues)
@kylejacobson9587 There are a few issues like this, you are right 😀 just saying overall CNN doesn't feel left leaning at all to us, it feel even center right on many issues. It looks a bit like the meme of the KKK murderous crowd facing the equal rights protesters with the guy in the center weaving the "compromise?" sign.
All news is politicized, even if it is presented without "opinion." The choice of topics, the airtime of topics, and the sources chosen are all political choices. It's a mistake to think that opinionless news is apolitical.
Silly question - but what happens if a TH-cam news channel gets it wrong - or deliberately twists things around for some other agenda ? Can you complain to anyone to hold them to account ?
Not really, TLDR falls in the same issues as CNN. They don't have insight, their reports always assume that when there are two sides they are equal, and they are superficial in business analytics and political insight (because of the small crew and fast rate of production).
@@airtale8725 Quite some truth to that. The difference beeing taht TLDR are ~10 blokes working from a small studio in London instead of a mega complex news giant with global outlets. They can shift faster but most important they don't need 100 million viewers to break even. Even if people like you do tune out because you think they are shallow and say nohing, they still have a business model with just an qudience who would like the overview explainers.
"We want to move to the centre" = "We want to become more right wing" every time You NEVER hear anybody on the right say they should move more toward the centre, it always someone/something nominally more on the left moving to the right
Exactly this. The fact that CNN is even considered "left" at all is wild. In most of the rest of the world it'd be center or center-right. Just goes to show how right wing America as a whole is.
Well, to be fair, their target audience is more right wing. People who watch TV are older, and older people are mostly conservatives. That and the fact that a 'billionaire libertarian' is mentioned as a benefactor. Billionaires just want to cheat more taxes, hence, they want the country to go as far right as possible.
@@3xsxs953Unless you're talking about "Universal Healthcare" idk what you're talking about with CNN being "center-right" outside America. I'm not American and people still see CNN as left biased
Being centrist means like trying to be half on the side of law and half on the side of crime. A fire-fighter, who is an arson at the same time. A sane person, who would believe in god...
I'm sure someone has mentioned this by now, but Warner Bros. doesn't own MTV, VH1, or Nickelodeon. The logo lock-up used in the video depicting the different brands owned by Warner Bros. Is inaccurate. It includes MTV, VH1, and Nickelodeon, which are not brands owned by Warner Bros. Although Warner Bros. helped start All three networks, Paramount purchase MTV and Nickelodeon from Warner Bros. in 1985 and 1990, respectively. I'm not sure when Paramount acquired VH1, but it was most likely included with the MTV acquisition. Also, Fandango owns Rotten Tomatoes, which is owned by Comcast. Warner Bros. maintains a minority ownership stake in Rotten Tomatoes.
There’s a couple mistakes in this video. First, Nickelodeon, VH1, and MTV are Viacom, Now Paramount Global properties along with Comedy Central and BET. They’ve never been a part of WBD. Also Brianna Keilar still works at CNN as one of the anchors of the afternoon edition of News Central, though her old show was canceled. Jim Acosta also still works at CNN and holds the same timeslot he did prior to the WBD Merger. These mistakes don’t fundamentally change the story, but they’re pretty sloppy considering they could have been fixed by a simple visit to corporate pages for WBD and CNN.
As a Canadian I can say I primarily rely on BBC for global news. I know some Brits think BBC is biased on some UK specific topics. But for coverage about some issue in Asia or Africa, I don't detect any bias or partisanship in BBC's coverage. Imagine if CNN can have that reputation
As a Brit, I think bbc constantly try to achieve a neutral middle ground. They manage to annoy both the left and right, so must be doing something right!
As an outsider looking in to the landscape of news in the US, a majority of people just want their belief to be afirmed The days of fact checking and weighing both side are long gone. In order to survive you have to pick a side, there's nobody in the middle. CNN could have leveraged their brand internationally but it's too little too late at this point. RT have a bigger international audience compared to CNN now.
There is definitely a strong appetite for neutral, unbiased news. The problem for CNN is that they now have a core audience who are not used to unbiased news. They're used to an echo chamber, so it will take time and patience for CNN to retrain it's audience. Firing Licht just made that more difficult. CNN won't turn itself neutral overnight, it will take 5-10 years for audiences to adjust. Ratings will move up and down with it.
Newsnation is over there.......they ain't doing too good either. Chris Licht was a terrible programming director. CNN needs to go back to politics and not Anderson Cooper specials on CNN+
I think the problem with mainstream news is that it’s too much news. “News” refers to factual events that happened yesterday. You could cover all of that in 30 minutes. I want analysis, which is what TLDR provides. “CNN got a new CEO” that’s news. “CNN is in big trouble,” that’s analysis and that’s what I love. “Opinion” is rarely ever analysis, but simply an echo chamber. “Opinion” interviews involve the guest making claims without supporting them with any kind of evidence or logic. That’s why I watch TH-cam news. Mainstream media needs to be more like TH-cam.
i just have to hand it to the editor/(s) during 13:35 to 13:41, genuinely great work on making the reflections on the bottle on the table mimic the TV (its more noticeable during the switch to static)
Your video came up in my recommendations and I’m glad it did! I was familiar with the topic in passing but this was very well-organized and I thought the visuals were just right. I subscribed and I hope others do as well, keep it up!
One thing about FOX that I think is overlooked is that they still allow and encourage viewer comments. All the big news agencies phased comments out years ago. Why would a news organization fear viewer comments ?? It's a big question. Do they fear something ?? Might viewers have different opinions from theirs ?? Hmmmm🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔
In Blue Church orthodoxy, right wing free speech is violence. Left wing violence is free speech. Look into the cultural Marxist concept of "Repressive Tolerance." Know that both Obama and Hillary Clinton are fans of Saul Alinsky.
it is a 2 ways street these days. The media want us in extremes as the middle ground is where understanding and reason lie, and that is bad for business. @@klaymatic3751
@@klaymatic3751 A right wing troll is anyone who cites facts, events, and data that disproves progressive. Censorship is mandatory to maintain big lies.
I cut the cable TV cord. every time I paid my 200 dollars a month cable internet bill I felt like I was subsidizing the fake news channels. I bought a fire stick from Amazon and now get 100s of hours of program content , movies , real news from independent programs for just the price of internet. about 50 bucks a month.
Correction: VH1, MTV and Nickelodeon or NOT owned by WarnerMedia. They are owned by Viacom, now known as Paramount Global (Paramount Pictures). Rotten Tomatoes is owned by Fandango, which is just a JV between WarnerMedia and Comcast.
I lost respect for CNN when they had that absolutely disgraceful town hall. It was Anderson Cooper's words that keep me from ever wanting to go back. I did not appreciate being told that I have a silo problem instead that they have a cash flow and boss problem. This was the day I turned my back for good on them! If Cooper had not said that stupid crap I may have gone back, but those words were a bridge too far blaming the viewers for their ridiculous programming choices. They successfully managed to alienate all the viewers who became accustomed to their broadcasting style, and send them packing. I removed them from my viewing list on youtube and will not watch their programming anymore they can blame someone else for their failings and shortcomings!
CNN is boring. Two much on politics and politicians repeating the same thing they said yesterday and the day before. CNN is unbalanced to one topic and most airtime is opinion. Let people draw their own conclusions. No more opinions from Sen. LieAlot.
Canadians thinking they can't handle opinion is a non-starter for US audiences who can; often, just not too often, opinions are welcome in getting a handle on how people in another political zoo otherwise "think". When the opinion sticks with being too opinionated by rightwingers, a minute or two causes more than enough for any but their audience to bail. Left opinion actually in the US is stretched across media enough for us to keep listening. The fact the Reicht really only has Fox Snooze and 2 tiny nothingburgers of disinfirmation misleads observers to think they represent the entire country. They don't. See the antiTrump majorities over the last several elections for a clue. If tldr is to mean anything to the young outside of high school age, it should be nonstop Progressive. Which is how 90% of them vote. tldr is too childlike to even attempt it.
Really enjoying the business content recently. This type of explainer that gives insight into how massive corporations work is particularly interesting. Keep it up 🙏
The main problem is that cable has become sort of semi-obsolete, like radio before it. Sure, it will never 100% disappear, but it’s glory days are long over. Cable might be able to reinvent itself with services like twitch, but that’s about it. They will have to continue to do some cuts, as the competition between twitter, TH-cam and to some extent twitch for information content is very high
I want News, not commentary. All CNN, Fox, etc. do is give their spin on the news.
PBS newshour
Reuters and Associated Press
pBS is complete leftist spin and so is Reuters.
If you want real news try sky news Australia or Russian Times
Western news media is beholden to the uni party
The leftist have largely taken over media.
MSNBC, ABC, CBS, and WaPo/Huffpo along with TDS(PBS) all push the same leftist tripe FOX news is controlled opposition designed to "cater" to the "right"
All you have to do is check their "views"
On abortion
Feminism
Masculinity
Climate change
Ice vehicles
Taxes
Israel Gaza war
Ukraine/Russia conflict
Capitalism
Big tech
And you'll see they're all in lockstep just like they were with the "plandemic"
If you don't subscribe to their rhetoric like the "COVID-19" situation
You're a
Xxxxx denier
Conspiracy theorist
Far right extremist
Or some kind of "phobe"
It's useless to consult such people on anything more than the current ambient air temperature
Id even like seeing more male anchors
Ah..old Walter Kronkite
Wit teletype 🤣noise
Along,with Huntley Brinkley ☺️
Fox does Have several Real Reporters CNN has NONE
If CNN actually wanted, "News News," as they say they do, there's no need to court political interests on either side. All you have to do is present factual and unbiased information.
The problem is that the attempts to return to 'The Center' aren't actually driven by journalistic integrity, they're driven by a desire for a wider consumer audience and higher ratings and people on *both sides* of the spectrum know pandering like this when they see it.
Excellent point the problem of bringing more viewership together with unbiased informations. Therein lies the problem because the truth is in 9 of 10 times something you will not like.
Which brings up the real question: Is the profit-motive compatible with the news-sector?
@@AaronOkeanos "Is the profit-motive compatible with the news-sector?" Comparing to what? I'm watching how after each election in my country tax funded TV is having management replaced, for the one that shares views of newly elected government. I also watched how a few foreign "independent" news channels, were a very expensive way of expressing strong bias of local unelected establishment.
There is a different problem with not for profit system - assuming that quality is high, people should willing to pay for such content and it should be self financing, possibly profitable. If you have to force them to pay, then you most likely know the answer concerning value for money.
The people watching fox and CNN want the drama they don't want the news.
Having been in essence a super PAC for several years they needed to clear the air for anyone but the hard left to consider them news and be share information with them.
I think you may want to say “Objective” instead of unbiased.
I made the same mistake in my head.
Being unbiased has limited utility.
Sooner or later liars always fall. Being large in the "media", they fall harder.
The kids don't care. CNN and Fox are so 20th Century...(20th Century Fox = pun) Trump was 2016. AND BIG TV was really just BIG OIL. Elon Musk had a shot but he lost his mind.
Honestly we're better off without the 24/7 attention grabby sensationalised news cycle
24/7 news isn’t going to die. It’s simply going to migrate to your phone. I mean it kinda has already. Every day your going to get blitz with notifications and see news compete with your normal content. Honestly, it’s not going to get better
We dont need it. The internet exists. 🤷♂️
having docu's to take hours off it would be just better
The constant screaming for attention is tiring…I cut the cord years ago…
I agree. We only needs news a couple times are day. Not 24/7 unless something very special is happening.
Lemon deserved to get fired. He was unbearable to watch.
I still can't believe he was on primetime two hrs and I m still pissed at him and Cuomo laughing over crime in cities
Lemon is the worse
A real LEMON
That Morning Joe and his nutzo wife need to find a new job at mc D's
I would switch off CNN when came his program
Yeah people cancelled cable when they realized the news on there was always lying to them.
Especially when everyone said BIDEN WAS HEALTHY
I agree. The news has become nothing but lies. We cancelled our cable and don't miss the crap, a bit. The charges cable expects a person to pay, is insane. They are robbing all of us.
CNN still saying NATO is winning the Ukraine War with millions of Ukrainians kill from 2022-Spring of 2024.
Especially when they're telling us there are 700+ human Gender and a person can be identified as animal, hard pass. Indoctrination network will damage viewers psychological well being.
Myself included.
There was a time when Journalists reported the news. No bias, no personal opinions. Integrity was vital to their reputation.
I'm 28 and can't remember when that was the case. I'm sure it was at some point, but not in my adult life.
"If you fail to read the newspaper you are uninformed, if you read the newspaper you are misinformed." Mark Twain, 1870
@@The-Contractor
Exactly !
There was never a time when the news wasn't bias.... it's just gotten worse.
😊😊
@@MidwestArtMan I'm 43. It was much better. I'd watch it every morning before work. That is how I saw what was happening, as it was all happening on 9/11. I watched the news before then too.
I gave up cable. Way too expensive. I can have internet without ads.
Same here cable is just too expensive. all I need is landline and internet
As a Canadian, CNN used to be my go to for American news. After this recent Trump debacle, they've completely lost me. I will never take CNN seriously again after that.
What took you so long?
They were fake news long before Trump era!!!
CNN GAKE NEWS they don’t tell you the truth
I don't know if CNN used to be reputable or I was ignorant but it used to be my go to News also.
You could have shortened this entire broadcast by just saying the reason why their viewership is down and the reason why they're losing is because they're dishonest now if you had said that you could have shortened this up to one or two minutes
Thank youtube for that....
Now clean up msnbc
If centrism is the inability to criticise one or even both sides failings, that isn't serious journalism, it is pandering. Neutrality is to tell anybody when they fucked up. Serious journalism is to discover that investigatively, not just report on it when others do. The ultimate goal of journalism is to check the work of the politicians so that their actual achievements and failures are known to the voting public. Well that, and similar things in non-politics news segments.
Problem is, this strategy will put you in the right's crosshairs. You will be hailed as a communist and liberal stooge.
truth isn't centrism or neutrality- cnn became a half truth teller- a news model that doesn't age well. fox, cnn and msnbc got/are getting what they deserved and swallowed
Well put 👍
I agree and I think that this video conflates two aspects of CNN’s attempted shift. On one hand, they tried (or at least said they would try) to focus more on fact-based reporting rather than featuring tons of opinion content or constantly bashing Trump. On the other, they tried to capture right leaning tv watchers by firing more prominent trump critics and making content they thought those watchers would like. Those two goals aren’t the same. One aims to focus on featuring the most important stories in a straight analysis-free manner. The other panders to a viewing demographic.
I think a problem is that politics in USA at the moment divides people into two camps, with neither willing to listen to critisisms about their own.
I'm 66 years old and even I get it; why waste money on cable? I killed mine 5 1/2 years ago. That's a little more that $13,000 that i saved over the years.
I have not had cable for 20 years,
People want the truth, sick of lies, and politically motivated agendas. People are not as dumb as they thought.
Well according to CNN’s rating there are about 400,000 morons
Actually it turns out people are even dumber than we all thought. 😂
People are shockingly dumb. And people are far more interested in the narrative that best represents their biased beliefs. The truth would actually unite both the right and left against the people in power.
@@reneolguin1081 Americans are.
fox news viewers are beyond dumb.
I’m Happy that CCN is struggling honestly they are to blame for a lot of journalistic problems nowadays.
Then you be a lot more happy if Warner Bros. Discovery will spinoff CNN.
I feel bad for people at CNN since these idiots are messing with their careers.
Journalistic problems are caused by the journalists. CNN needs to get rid of some very lame commentators. They filled some key positions with very biased people.
@@samoyed81966
Everyone will be a lot happier when all these networks go bankrupt.
I C what you did there
Their agendas became so obvious and blatant to the point of insulting the intelligence of the viewers.
You are ON POINT. Even though FAUX bought CNN,the programming stayed parallel to FAUX in a way that it is still considered the same as FAUX.
And just who do you think is “telling the truth?”
Candace Owens@@rrpostalagain
@@danieltyler8932 Awesome. Made my day, thx.
@@danieltyler8932The chick so crazy even Rogan won't talk to her anymore? That's incredible dude 😂
"People want news in their news" - LOL. Well done to these big brains for catching up.
Short answer: News media is in trouble because it's terrible.
It would be like if an Oakland TV station brought back every story to how it affects the Raiders footballl team. If they talked about how an apartment fire was going to cause the team to be sad, and underperform in next week's game. How the increase in drug use was focused around weekdays, because obviously people enjoy watching the Raiders more than shooting up. How the increase in new housing construction was a boon for the team as it would add fans. Like, we just want the info, not the unrelated analysis of how it will help a (political) sportsbal team.
Let’s be real.
CNN is NOT failing because the audience is media literate and therefore reject its superficial reporting.
The audience in general are more partisan and thirst for outrage and sensationalism.
CNN doesn’t know how to serve this audience.
And because it’s a corporate oil tanker, it cannot change direction. It cannot adapt. It lacks agility.
Big money, big names, big debts, and no one is willing to make changes for fear of affecting the share price.
Too big to succeed
Also for years they accused Trump for everything including bad weather that even people who criticed Trump said: wait a moment that is not true
He said he wanted something like Faux News, which has about 5HR of news news and 19HR of ppl yelling.
Honestly I don't even think that's right either. People want propaganda that reinforces their views, the fact that Faux news (and more recently the newer even more radically right wing Cable news channel competitor) have both done so well for so long proves it. CNN should have just embraced being called too liberal and tried to compete with MSNBC if they wanted to improve their ratings.
It's *2023.* Young people just don't watch TV that much anymore. Heck, I was born in '88, and I pretty much never watch television. Everything is online.
I am 53 in a few days and hardly watch TV anymore. It's not just the young.
Born in '91 and don't watch TV as well. I have Netflix, YT Premium, and for everything else, Torrent.
46, and I was never a huge fan of TV in general, let alone TV news. The internet, for all its flaws, has been my primary resource for news.
I haven't watched television in years.
Yes, but that's a big problem. You know why? Because we'll be getting our news from who knows where? At least with news networks you could know who owns them. Do you know who owns any YT channel? Who is giving money to content creators? In some cases yes, but not all. Then, Bob the TH-camr won't be getting press credentials at the White House, so he's unlikely to have access to get interviews with presidents and prime-ministers. Last, but not least, probably the biggest problem: bubbles. Online is a medium that favours the creation of bubbles. We will never see what news other sides are getting in their bubble and it has happened to me to see someone comment: what about X? And I would be thinking... WTF is X? What are you talking about?
The general public needs a baseline of common information/knowledge to have a functional debate across party lines. Otherwise, considering the bubbles, we'll look at one another like we're crazy, not knowing what the other side knows. Division is deeper when this common foundation doesn't exist and for all their faults, cable news media could provide that. Online media, like YT channels, can't really do that. There are big TH-camrs that I've never, ever heard of, channels with millions of followers, but being outside of my bubble, I wouldn't know. And the same goes for everyone. The internet and social media are too disjointed and decentralized to get a complete picture.
If cable tv bills were paid a-la-carte (meaning consumers only pay for the channels they want to watch) the way they should be, you would see 95% of channels evaporate overnight. The cream rises to the top.
I wish we could block the unwanted channels like we block unwanted crazies on our social media - TH-cam is the only way to x all that crap out
Liberal Nazi traitors sue them all
The moment journalism starts expressing it's opinion it becomes propaganda
That’s ABSOLUTELY ALL FOX is and does
@@ericcrawford8308Waaa waaa. Funny how Fox is still successful, whereas your limpdick organisations are tanking. Maybe woke bullshit isn't as popular as you want it to be...
No , Fox does have more facts to back. Their news app than CNN ever did ,not that fox is right all the time but way more correct with their news and CNN
@@ericcrawford8308so do you think this video is inaccurate?
@@ericcrawford8308I completely agree w/u. CNN, MSNBC, ABC, CBS etc all of these news sites EXCEPT for FOX NEWS tell the truth. If u watch them ur not going to hear lies. Here’s just a couple examples:
▪️Fox News claimed that VP Harris had ordered copies of her children’s book to be gifted to migrant children at a Department of Health and Human Services shelter in CA. This was not based on facts & the story was retracted but the misinfo was already out there.
▪️Fox News claimed President Biden is coming for our burgers 🫤 🍔 claiming that Biden’s administration would require Americans to radically reduce the amount of red-meat that they eat due to Biden's climate policy. This is NOT TRUE. Cmon there is truth & there is fiction. At least the other stations don’t blatantly lie about the craziest things!
▪️Do we even want to get into the settlement Fox News agreed to do they didn’t have to go to court w/Dominion which is a much smaller company then Fox. They were sued for DEFAMATION & btw if I were Hunter Biden I would sue Fox News too! He didn’t choose to work in his Daddy’s cabinet like Jared & Ivanka so he should’ve be scrutinized like he’s a public figure. The GOP & Fox care more about his nudes & I start wondering why is that 🤔
TLDR news has destroyed cable news 😂😂😂
You can't trust MSBC of BBC either
Or any medial site
The term “slow news day” came out of the newspaper era. We don’t need a goddamned 24 hour news cycle.
True, that!
There’s nothing wrong with opinion programming as long as you can differentiate the between news and opinion. CNN as well as most establishment media has failed to do that. That’s why they’ve lost credibility and podcast and independent journalism has flourished.
All news is opinions even if you think it looks nicer and sounds nicer or is less abrasive than the traditional media it is still opinions.
Your opinion can change which aspects of a topic that are reported which can completely change a news story.
Go read a news article on something that you're an expert in from a source that you claim to trust and tell me that it's not an opinion
You're confusing opinions with bias.
All news is biased, although some agencies try harder than others to reduce the impact of that bias.
News, however, is not opinion. Opinion requires no verification or fact-checking, whereas news does. It's why Fox is so dangerous, because it presents it's opinions in a news format, and never explicitly state that it isn't news (except when threatened with lawsuits) so people think their opinions are true.
No. They've lost credibility because malevolent bad-faith actors have organized and worked hard to discredit them. You know what else has "lost credibility" the same way in these years? Teachers, fact-checkers, doctors and literal fucking **science.**
That’s one of the biggest problems I see with US journalism today. The first newspaper I read regularly had an opinion section clearly marked and on separate pages. Obviously no journalism is completely pure news without any opinion, even just selecting which stories to report is an inherently biased thing. But they tried their best to report as neutrally as possible on the news, didn’t use biased words there etc.
The difference with the "cable news" networks is 100% of their programming is political opinion. The 3 prime networks have "news" segments at specific time slots, with talk shows, game shows, and varieties of drama and comedy genres. News papers certainly have political party leanings, but they also have straightforward reporting in sports and lifestyle interests topics. The cable guys are just lying by calling themselves "news".
Zucker getting fired was no loss for CNN Just the opposite in fact since he was the architect of making the network only appeal to the relatively small group of the population that is hard-left
Personally I think moving towards the center and focusing on facts doesn’t necessarily mean appeasing both parties. It means objectively reporting regardless of whether either side thinks it’s fair
Absofrickinlutely😁 somebody understood the assignment. 👍
Of course it does. But when one side consistently lies or is wrong much more often, then “neutral” gets accused of picking sides. Neutral only works if both sides are equally right and wrong at most times. Too often I see people try to be neutral when the actual facts are one sided.
Well, focusing on facts makes one somehow usually go 180 degrees from where the right wing tends to go now.
If anything everyone would like the news less. There's a reason the news is like this, it's more profitable. People are way more willing to sit and watch someone tell them what they want to hear.
@@twelvecatsinatrenchcoat Bingo. Welcome to the agendemic! Post Bush-era so began the sideism media pit of: echo chambers, cherry picking, white knighting, sjw, anti jw, one-off examples used to paint massive murals of fuzzy pictures, and rallying and rowdying the herds through divisive, clickbait, edgy, and manipulated sludge.
Oh there was a gay picture book left by an 8th grade troll in a library shelf?
'The entire school system is broken by horrific libs and queers down to the core!!
Oh someone called a teenage Afam "boy" behind a register in Alabama?
'This plague of racism is only spinning worse out of control by the hands of privelaged white americans!'
(Totally not uneducated idiots as the most common problem...
& Not just 1/100th, of .01%, of a 1/200 urban county, in 1/50 states are those 2 one-off schools the issue, in a nation of 700million+ people...) But now suddenly, everybody grabs their pitchforks and rallies behind their echo chamber herd, and spins up overarching blanket issues out of thin air as stances to hate for and love one another over.
This is why I live happily in the mountains outside of an urban area. No politics up here, and all of my neighbors get along with one another, in likely a 60/40 R/D split, by which data supports also.
I don't think traditional news media should expect to make a huge profit when they are there to push political agenda of their shareholders. That being said I don't mean this necessarily hurt their neutrality and credibility, but it is incredibly naive to expect any news outlets, TLDR News included, don't have a political agenda to make in their shows.
Thank you. There is no such thing as “unbiased” news. It has been harmful for decades to pretend it is something that exists much less is somehow superior and therefore desirable to attain.
You'd have to define 'political agenda'. Media orgs in general may lean left or right or may even favour certain political parties, but usually won't fully stand behind them. The EIC or manager can curtail some heat from a big news story, but if something newsworthy happens to a political party, they're usually on it like flies on shit.
Then of course you have the usual tenets that many news orgs abide by, don't be racist, don't be a bigot, etc, and I don't know how many people would call that a 'political agenda' nowadays.
@@ruekurei88Fox News has left the chat.... 😬
TLDR is funded by global investment firms, so I would not be so sure of that.
Who?
News shouldn't be left or right regardless of the extreme, thats why i only use local TH-camrs in the area in which i seek the news
The last time I watched CNN was during the coverage of the Trump vs. Clinton election in 2016. When Trump's victory was announced, CNN journalists had a nervous breakdown. It was the most unprofessional thing I had ever seen on television. The bias so was obvious. I decided that day that I would never watch CNN again, not because I supported one candidate over the other, but because it became obvious to me that CNN was an unprofessional company, and that this type of company would not report the news, but create the news to their liking. And time just proved I was right. I don't think I will EVER watch CNN again.
Go woke go broke....simple math
Assume you don’t watch Fox News for the same reason you give.
I agree.
LOL...did you miss that meltdown at Fox News when Obama was reelected and in 2020 when Biden was elected?
Just out of curiosity! What do you think of Fox News..?
Claims of “misinformation” are simply a way of saying that you don’t agree with the politics of a particular point of view.
"Unlike the Americans, we prefer not to get our bad news from CNN." M (Judi Dench), Goldeneye.
Cut to the next movie and the whole plot is how the Carver Media Group knows about the ship sinking before they do.
😹 Some of us here in the States agree! 😹
I used to watch CNN on a daily basis but stopped around 2021. I stopped watching the news so much in general. I got tired of the rage inducing headlines everyday. It was not good for my mental health. I still like to keep up with the news by subscribing to neutral news channels like tldr.
Those rage inducing headlines were bad for the mental health of the nation. So many people died from lack of socialization and from lack of exercise during lockdowns and from stress caused by the actions of corporate media and politicians.
"You should be afraid." - CNN, October 2020.
Same. I prefer short summaries of important things that happened during the week, because tgere is just too much noise that I won't remember even in an hour since reading about it.
@@purplespeckledappleeater8738well unfortunately we had every reason to be afraid because an unhinged lunatic was running the country and had no interest in actually addressing the problem presented by the pandemic. And we could tell it was like a toddler was in charge
@@angelainamarie9656 And the Biden Administration are not behaving like unhinged lunatics? Have you been following the Hunter Biden trials? The Biden Administration is legally incompetent without the protection of the DOJ. Calling a man so wealthy he can fund his own elections without having to make backroom deals for political donations a toddler is shoddy backwards-thinking logic. Most politicians only become millionaires after becoming politicians, thus become plugged into a political machine that many Americans endearingly refer to as "The Swamp". You came up with a bad regurgitated excuse for why someone you don't like is bad instead of listing something they actually did.
Trump did address the pandemic through organizing the vaccines and recommending hydroxychloroquine and organizing efforts to manufacture domestic medical supplies for use during the pandemic. I worked in 2020 building hazmat and ventilator packs under the Trump initiative while the US outbid other countries for critically needed medical supplies after China went into lockdown. There is evidence China may have had their leak as early as August of 2019 and were intentionally flying individuals with COVID around the world thus spreading the virus. The first cities in the US to get COVID were New York, LA, and Seattle who refused to shut down initially. In Seattle they knew of a mystery illness and did not report it to the CDC, thus spreading the virus. Leftist mainstream media also confused how to safeguard against COVID all through the Summer of 2020 for months with nonsensical recommendations such as wearing multiple masks that led to people passing out from lack of oxygen, which causes brain damage and lying about the lethality of the virus while simultaneously promoting people go out into the streets of cities to riot, thus spreading the disease. COVID reached the state of Georgia after an African American family from Atlanta had a huge funeral with hundreds of people and many infected people then spread the virus. Democrats did a lot to spread COVID and make the pandemic far worse than it had to be for years including laying off essential workers and military personnel while violating human rights and Constitutional rights. Containing a pandemic risks isolating the disease and creating new variants, meaning the Democrats made the disease mutate through lockdowns. Many Americans didn't die of COVID but died from lockdowns and isolation, became homeless, and mental illness and drug abuse skyrocketed as did violence and crime.
CNN was continuously looping overinflated COVID statistics and Trump rallies back-to-back and repeating "you should be afraid" before the election. The Democrats spent $14 billion calling Trump and Republicans racists through propaganda. In Detroit we had literal billboards calling Trump a racist and racial advertising targeting specific voting demographics.
Same here-it seemed like Anderson and Company was and likely still is on a mission to light fires under their audience’s collective ass, to keep them at the edge of their seats!
In Vietnam, first time in over a month I turned on my TV again and CNN disappear from the list of channel and I am glad. Not sure if its a global trend or only here. Occationally whenever I watch news on TV, only DW but never CNN
I find it ironic that journalists, people who are full of themselves and think they are in a position to educate (indoctrinate) others are the very last people to realize just how irrelevant they've become.
i get that snobby feeling from them, its disgusting
Same with fancy university professors.
Excellent point, at some point journalists, critics, actors, musicians etc. mostly started spewing 'the message'
Very true. Tim the beanie and Styx are more trusted.
@@tadhgcronin175 You're just replacing one set of lying ideologues with another.
In my opinion, the established press has killed itself by every year progressing more towards bringing the news babyboomers want to see to get their feelings confirmed, rather than trying to be a relatively neutral and objective channel that brings wisdom through facts.
The babyboomers literally ruined everything.
The babyboomers are the ones more likely to watch old media news and so they're trying to get a piece of that demo pie. Not sure how that'll work though, it's not like Fox News is gonna disappear and those viewers already hate CNN, they've now alienated what audience they have, and MSNBC is probably gobbling up more of that marketshare already. Warner Brothers Discovery is making some weird moves.
Basically you are saying you are a snowflake and don't like what they report. Therefore they are 'killing themselves' lol
I mean, younger people are watching biased TH-cam content instead. TH-cam’s political news (more like commentary) is a mess. The only difference is cable news is massive decline. The market for more neutral news like TLDR is relatively small.
If you think it’s just the baby boomers who enjoy being fed their own shit your proving a point beautifully 😂
I remember growing up not knowing the political leanings of any of the newspeople. - Even on CNN. Not saying they were totally impartial. Just that they at least attempted to remain impartial to some degree. Crazy, right?
All I ask of a news outlet is that they tell me what they see, not their interpretations of what they see.
Yea they are always trying to the o tell us what we re seeing when that ain't what we re seeing at all like MSeeNBC censors trump when he s talking to th
Who else finds it difficult to remember the last CNN segment that was not politically connected in someway or another?
1984, The Ministry of Truth, today CNN
Check your CNN employee roster, boys. Brianna Keilar and Jim Acosta are both still working at CNN.
But they are less seen on the newsroom.
Brianna hosts in the afternoons while Jim anchors on the weekends. Not all timeslots are viewer magnets, are they? Still, that is far from being fired.
The Town Hall was great. The only problem with it was Kaitlan kept debating Trump.
Lying to people, disguised as journalism.
They failed completely to bring back investigative journalism, period...thus the continued decline 👍
do not need investigate journalism too liberal even for me I'm center-left, we need more professional journalism.
Bingo. Welcome to the agendemic! Post Bush-era so began the sideism media pit of: echo chambers, cherry picking, white knighting, sjw, anti jw, one-off examples used to paint massive murals of fuzzy pictures, and rallying and rowdying the herds through divisive, clickbait, edgy, and manipulated sludge.
Oh there was a gay picture book left by an 8th grade troll in a library shelf?
'The entire school system is broken by horrific libs and queers down to the core!!
Oh someone called a teenage Afam "boy" behind a register in Alabama?
'This plague of racism is only spinning worse out of control by the hands of privelaged white americans!'
(Totally not uneducated idiots as the most common problem...
& Not just 1/100th, of .01%, of a 1/200 urban county, in 1/50 states are those 2 one-off schools the issue, in a nation of 700million+ people...) But now suddenly, everybody grabs their pitchforks and rallies behind their echo chamber herd, and spins up overarching blanket issues out of thin air as stances to hate for and love one another over.
This is why I live happily in the mountains outside of an urban area. No politics up here, and all of my neighbors get along with one another, in likely a 60/40 R/D split, by which data supports also.
As a long time hater of CNN, my best wishes.
That's the correct path for humanity.
"Hate" is a strong word.. Why do you hate this particular news network? Is there a network you "love".? .Fox, for example?
@@daydays12 Fox is controlled opposition, ALL mainstream news media is garbage, and I too hate CNN
To paraphrase Mocha Jesus: "You're on the right side of history."
imagine if CNN reported on actual news...
There is no thing as "Neutral" news, you can make low-bias news, but neutrality requires being outside the very system you are analysing.
I mean, even AI is biased so you can't expect humans not to be
No, there can be neutral news, TLDR is a great example of it.
Based on the fact that among his viewers there are both people who disdain CNN for being far left echo chamber and for daring to once invite Trump, TLDR is reasonable job at not being specially biased.
@@dragos1239AI doesn’t think nor have opinions, so this is irrelevant.
Its is NEVER possible to have unbiased neutral news. Even if you are outside the system you are going to have your own beliefs which may make inclined toward a side.
Insane how much traditional news viewership dropped after Trump left office. It's not just the fault of traditional news media - we were all addicted to the outrage. I'm encouraged that most of my friends and I are sick of it and hungry for centrism, facts, and cross-aisle collaboration.
outrage ?
@@99guspuppet8 sounds a little left-of-center
@@OhioOwns ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️
Ah, so now that the far left has achieved power by crushing people's skulls (Officer Dorn) and dominating the public square during the CHOP/CHAZ Summer of Love, you're sick of it and hungry for centrism and cross aisle collaboration?
over the aisle? With whom? MTG? Boobert? Mitch McTurtle?
Broadcast TV news are quickly becoming a thing of the past. A relic like black and white TVs
Man I love billionaires just deciding the politics of media consumed by hundreds of millions of people around the world.
ABC news is owned by disney. My wife and I gave up on watching it when the purchase was made. I don't know which is worse 1 crazy rich owner or the biased employees of a giant company, who don't even own massive amounts of the company's stock, using the power of the company to force news organization to tow their personal lines.
Biden had humans falling of airplanes.
CNN isn't all that significant around the world. Just cos it's American doesn't automatically make it the world news. It's almost entirely American news, from an American perspective, for American audiences. This bias, which it shares with its rivals Fox and the rest btw, is its most common - and normalized - form of bias, which is entirely taken for granted by its audience as they themselves mostly hail from America and see things the same way. It's not even considered political, but it very much is.
It is downright disgusting. And in the case of CNN, it leaves traditional viewers disoriented and dismayed seeing this lurch towards the GOP. And in the run up to 2024!
MSNBC is my new home.
MSNBC? Cough cough. You need to get out more.@@ALFarrell-kv6ok
“This is CNN news. We’re shutting down!” That will be the best news from CNN and the only news I would tune in to it.
People wants to be given actual facts and truth and then be left to make their own decisions based off that, not to be told what to think by biased coverage and a networks paid for opinion.
That is NOT true, people want their veiw to be supported. They want to be TOLD, they resent it, but it is easier! Now, back Dancing with the Stars.
Why are news companies shaking hands with politicians??? That's the core of the problem! I'm sure our founders expected news to be independent.
Very true.
I remember when Sean Hannity literally came on stage at a Trump Rally and gave a speech like that's a normal thing for a "journalist" to do.
@@twelvecatsinatrenchcoat Hannity doesn't pretend to be a journalist
@@DMS-pq8 Fair enough but still, it's not great. Like you are propaganda at that point. You are Party propaganda, you're Pravda.
@@twelvecatsinatrenchcoat As long as he doesn't claim to be a journalist and makes it very clear he has a side than its okay, The true danger are people who claim to be independent journalist who are in reality activist who only present the news in ways that help their side and hurt the other side
I sometimes forget cable new still exists. It seems like a very inefficient model to force round the clock news now that we have the internet.
If you're upsetting people from both sides of the political spectrum you're doing something right.
Americans ought to know there are alternatives.
DW News is a German, publicly owned international news channel that broadcasts in English.
France 24 is a French, publicly owned international news channel that broadcasts in English. Both cover US and international news, doing a much better job - in a calm, factual maner manner avoiding sensationalism. Oh and did l mention they almost never run ads?
I quite like DW news but you can't possibly be suggesting state owned news agencies are they way forward.
I'll take the BBC over CNN any day of the week@@ashleyfunnell9132
There's also PBS news hour for American made tame and cultured reporting. Support your locale PBS station.
@@ashleyfunnell9132 so you like dw news a state owned media which is miles better than cnn and fox , both privately owned. But you refuse to recognize the pattern in threse facts?
As an American, it is really scary that I hve to go to foreign news to get a balance view of what is going on in my country.
Imagine, as a so called "news" station not shoving your opinions down everyone's throats and actually just reporting the news from as neutral position...you know, like in the good old days.
Imagine thinking unbiased news ever existed 😂
@@LyricsFred The newspapers and reporters have always been biased.
@@morkthenonelib thats what im saying. There is no “good ol days”. Its always like this.
@@LyricsFred You can go back to the 1800s and see the biased reporting easily. You would think the media would try to hide this if they do not want fix this.
But in reality the media just doesnt care they just openly slam anyone that is not in agreement with them.
The sad part is the way people do not see this.
As opposed to the 60's, 70's, 80's (before 24/7 BS), what we have now is blatant lying and gaslighting, as opposed to having just a very small degree of slanted nonsense b4 24/7 vomit-fest, even you can see that right? 😆 @@LyricsFred
The last chance for legacy media was the 1990's when media stopped Congress from mandating pay per channel. With cable soon to be gone, that's exactly what we are going to get. Pay per channel.
Warner Discover doesn’t own MTV, VH1, Nickelodeon or The CW. Viacom owns MTV, VH1 and Nickelodeon. CW is 75% owned by nexstar
So they alienated the viewers they had for viewers they didn't have?
and are never going to get
Essentially..!
Yes
Yup, they budlighted themselves.
@@williamdavis9562 by the way, Kid Rock was caught sneaking sips of Bud Light. Hypocrisy is everywhere.
In a world where people won’t really listen to anyone with different ideas & views, it’s asking a lot to find a meeting in the middle. In a world where differing ideas are always met with name calling and labels. It’s tough. We used to have more of a “let’s agree to disagree” tone… ”I still respect you’re right to hold a different view.” Sadly, that world seems dead and gone.
CNN was my news source for decades. The key word is 'was'!
Can’t stand the obvious bias in all mainstream media. How they keep any viewers is beyond me.🤷🏽♂
CNN stop being news source after Ted Turner sold it. All cable "News" is entertainment
They should just state fact checked facts. Wouldn't that be wonderful?
That’s what the liars at fake news CNN say they do now.
I quit watching the Communist News Network after Hanoi Jane married Teddly.
Back in the day, they used to break up corporations that obtain too much control/power, but since our own government is guilty of the offense, it’s business as usual.
I find it funny how one news channel is slagging off another and, indeed, the entire news industry 😂
When your credit rating is "C"
You definitely coming to an "End" "End"
We know there is a market for facts based jounalism. TLDR proved it.
I don’t consider TLDR “fact based journalism”. I don’t know how anyone could. Unless they are unable to take in the reporting uncritically.
well. I trust them
@@BlackDoveNYCWell, TLDR are relatively central leaning and give their opinions based on the facts, rather than political biases.
I take the most moderate and logical position; take information from all sides and you roughly could find the facts somewhere in the middle. I'm kinda surprise they mention the BBC and it's quite dumb to fully trust everything on BBC other than none political stuff.
And talking about Trump, you're be surprise that people in the Gulf likes Trump more than other US president through my own experience (One main reason: He didn't start a war in the Middle East.)
@@thoriqakbaryou’re a fool then 🤡
The news used to be delivered with a clock on the wall and an unattractive man behind a big micreiphone . But you got the news. Today the studio looks like a movie set with glamorous women and an occasional man, all very smily face and full of laughter. They are more important than the news or the BS they are reading.
Their anti-Trump campaign did not do themselves any favours.
Please stop perpetuating overly simplistic notions of right-wing and left-wing media.
I’m not sure you guys understand what “moving to the right” means. Switching toward more news over commentary and “moving right” are completely different things. France24 is news over commentary but they are not more right wing than CNN.
As an external observed, it looks more to me like the American Right has moved further to the right and CNN has remained exactly where it was issue-wise instead of CNN moving left. A shifting of the Overton Window.
The right has moved further to the right. However CNN didn't stay where it was. Starting in 2015 there was a notable and significant leftward shift
@kylejacobson9587 The question is a shift starting from where on the right left range? As an European I can tell you CNN feels very much right in the center right now. So maybe it started out center-right I don't know. Of course many of the concepts that are deemed "radical left" in the US, like universal health care and gun laws are a staple of our system and are not considered left leaning at all, so maybe that's why it puzzles me. Just saying that to us your left/right scale seems all skewed right.
@@JohnDowson100 Left-Right is only a useful description within a country, and looses meaning the further you zoom out, the less comparable it gets.
The American left is to the right of the European center on a variety of issues, such as the ones you listed. However there are areas where Europe is more right wing. For example, the Northern European states are generally recognized as regulating business less than the US. Also the American left is significantly to the left of Europe's left, generally, on issues of race, immigration, LGBTQ issues, and abortion(although, outside of Central Europe, the American right is likewise to the right of the right of most of Europe, there doesn't exist much middle on those issues)
@@JohnDowson100 Left-Right is only a useful description within a country, and looses meaning the further you zoom out, the less comparable it gets.
The American left is to the right of the European center on a variety of issues, such as the ones you listed. However there are areas where Europe is more right wing. For example, the Northern European states are generally recognized as regulating business less than the US. Also the American left is significantly to the left of Europe's left, generally, on issues of race, immigration, LGBTQ issues, and abortion(although, outside of Central Europe, the American right is likewise to the right of the right of most of Europe, there doesn't exist much middle on those issues)
@kylejacobson9587 There are a few issues like this, you are right 😀 just saying overall CNN doesn't feel left leaning at all to us, it feel even center right on many issues. It looks a bit like the meme of the KKK murderous crowd facing the equal rights protesters with the guy in the center weaving the "compromise?" sign.
I'm a lifetime conservative, CNN WAS MY GO TO CHANNEL. I TURNED IT OFF AFTER BUSCH...I CANT STAND BUSCH. LIAR
All news is politicized, even if it is presented without "opinion." The choice of topics, the airtime of topics, and the sources chosen are all political choices. It's a mistake to think that opinionless news is apolitical.
Yes but less so
I 65% blame TLDR personally, as I get my news 65% now from TLDR. Relatable trusty facts, mixed cooled opinions.
Silly question - but what happens if a TH-cam news channel gets it wrong - or deliberately twists things around for some other agenda ?
Can you complain to anyone to hold them to account ?
@@mrb.5610 what
Not really, TLDR falls in the same issues as CNN. They don't have insight, their reports always assume that when there are two sides they are equal, and they are superficial in business analytics and political insight (because of the small crew and fast rate of production).
@@adelalmohtaseb5261 Well - of the BBC or ITN tell a porkie, you can complain to to them or Ofcom
It's not perfect but at least it's something.
@@airtale8725 Quite some truth to that. The difference beeing taht TLDR are ~10 blokes working from a small studio in London instead of a mega complex news giant with global outlets. They can shift faster but most important they don't need 100 million viewers to break even. Even if people like you do tune out because you think they are shallow and say nohing, they still have a business model with just an qudience who would like the overview explainers.
Who knew that watching people run their mouth would end up being so insufferable
"We want to move to the centre" = "We want to become more right wing" every time
You NEVER hear anybody on the right say they should move more toward the centre, it always someone/something nominally more on the left moving to the right
Exactly this. The fact that CNN is even considered "left" at all is wild. In most of the rest of the world it'd be center or center-right. Just goes to show how right wing America as a whole is.
Well, to be fair, their target audience is more right wing. People who watch TV are older, and older people are mostly conservatives.
That and the fact that a 'billionaire libertarian' is mentioned as a benefactor. Billionaires just want to cheat more taxes, hence, they want the country to go as far right as possible.
@@3xsxs953Unless you're talking about "Universal Healthcare" idk what you're talking about with CNN being "center-right" outside America. I'm not American and people still see CNN as left biased
Being centrist means like trying to be half on the side of law and half on the side of crime. A fire-fighter, who is an arson at the same time. A sane person, who would believe in god...
I'm sure someone has mentioned this by now, but Warner Bros. doesn't own MTV, VH1, or Nickelodeon.
The logo lock-up used in the video depicting the different brands owned by Warner Bros. Is inaccurate. It includes MTV, VH1, and Nickelodeon, which are not brands owned by Warner Bros.
Although Warner Bros. helped start All three networks, Paramount purchase MTV and Nickelodeon from Warner Bros. in 1985 and 1990, respectively. I'm not sure when Paramount acquired VH1, but it was most likely included with the MTV acquisition.
Also, Fandango owns Rotten Tomatoes, which is owned by Comcast. Warner Bros. maintains a minority ownership stake in Rotten Tomatoes.
Thank you, I thought I had missed the sale of MTV Networks to Warner.
There’s a couple mistakes in this video. First, Nickelodeon, VH1, and MTV are Viacom, Now Paramount Global properties along with Comedy Central and BET. They’ve never been a part of WBD. Also Brianna Keilar still works at CNN as one of the anchors of the afternoon edition of News Central, though her old show was canceled. Jim Acosta also still works at CNN and holds the same timeslot he did prior to the WBD Merger. These mistakes don’t fundamentally change the story, but they’re pretty sloppy considering they could have been fixed by a simple visit to corporate pages for WBD and CNN.
As a Canadian I can say I primarily rely on BBC for global news. I know some Brits think BBC is biased on some UK specific topics. But for coverage about some issue in Asia or Africa, I don't detect any bias or partisanship in BBC's coverage. Imagine if CNN can have that reputation
As a Brit, I think bbc constantly try to achieve a neutral middle ground. They manage to annoy both the left and right, so must be doing something right!
I'm British and BBC is biased as F. Its not only on politics its also on immigration climate change etc etc. They are WEF puppets
Big negative bias for ex colonies, and on key issues in India specifically
A news channel that actually reported news is an extremely radical idea I know but it might just work.
You don't make any money teaching people. How do you make money doing that?
You make money by CONTROLLING people.
As an outsider looking in to the landscape of news in the US, a majority of people just want their belief to be afirmed The days of fact checking and weighing both side are long gone. In order to survive you have to pick a side, there's nobody in the middle.
CNN could have leveraged their brand internationally but it's too little too late at this point. RT have a bigger international audience compared to CNN now.
They need to start covering the news.
There is definitely a strong appetite for neutral, unbiased news. The problem for CNN is that they now have a core audience who are not used to unbiased news. They're used to an echo chamber, so it will take time and patience for CNN to retrain it's audience. Firing Licht just made that more difficult. CNN won't turn itself neutral overnight, it will take 5-10 years for audiences to adjust. Ratings will move up and down with it.
Newsnation is over there.......they ain't doing too good either. Chris Licht was a terrible programming director. CNN needs to go back to politics and not Anderson Cooper specials on CNN+
The only time I like being lied to is when the old lady tells me it was good!
I think the problem with mainstream news is that it’s too much news. “News” refers to factual events that happened yesterday. You could cover all of that in 30 minutes. I want analysis, which is what TLDR provides. “CNN got a new CEO” that’s news. “CNN is in big trouble,” that’s analysis and that’s what I love. “Opinion” is rarely ever analysis, but simply an echo chamber. “Opinion” interviews involve the guest making claims without supporting them with any kind of evidence or logic. That’s why I watch TH-cam news. Mainstream media needs to be more like TH-cam.
Well said.
i just have to hand it to the editor/(s) during 13:35 to 13:41, genuinely great work on making the reflections on the bottle on the table mimic the TV (its more noticeable during the switch to static)
That is a rhetorical question! When people can’t see the forest for the trees tells you all you need to know.
Your video came up in my recommendations and I’m glad it did! I was familiar with the topic in passing but this was very well-organized and I thought the visuals were just right. I subscribed and I hope others do as well, keep it up!
It may have something to do with them paying Erin Burnett 6M a year; when they could pay the runner up for Miss Teen USA 50K for doing the same job.
One thing about FOX that I think is overlooked is that they still allow and encourage viewer comments. All the big news agencies phased comments out years ago. Why would a news organization fear viewer comments ?? It's a big question. Do they fear something ?? Might viewers have different opinions from theirs ?? Hmmmm🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔
In Blue Church orthodoxy, right wing free speech is violence. Left wing violence is free speech. Look into the cultural Marxist concept of "Repressive Tolerance." Know that both Obama and Hillary Clinton are fans of Saul Alinsky.
Cause comment boards would get drowned out by right wing trolls. Not a problem if you are fox.
it is a 2 ways street these days. The media want us in extremes as the middle ground is where understanding and reason lie, and that is bad for business. @@klaymatic3751
@@klaymatic3751 A right wing troll is anyone who cites facts, events, and data that disproves progressive. Censorship is mandatory to maintain big lies.
Time-Warner divested MTV, Nickelodeon and VH1 around 1984. By the 1995 Turner merger those networks belonged to Viacom (Now Paramount Global).
Wouldn't be a TLDR video if they didn't screw up somewhere...
Time Warner was known as Warner-Annex.
I cut the cable TV cord. every time I paid my 200 dollars a month cable internet bill I felt like I was subsidizing the fake news channels. I bought a fire stick from Amazon and now get 100s of hours of program content , movies , real news from independent programs for just the price of internet. about 50 bucks a month.
Correction: VH1, MTV and Nickelodeon or NOT owned by WarnerMedia. They are owned by Viacom, now known as Paramount Global (Paramount Pictures). Rotten Tomatoes is owned by Fandango, which is just a JV between WarnerMedia and Comcast.
What's more, Paramount Global also owns CBS.
Dismantle them for their fake News and propaganda 😊😊😊😊😊
In favor of what??
I lost respect for CNN when they had that absolutely disgraceful town hall. It was Anderson Cooper's words that keep me from ever wanting to go back. I did not appreciate being told that I have a silo problem instead that they have a cash flow and boss problem. This was the day I turned my back for good on them! If Cooper had not said that stupid crap I may have gone back, but those words were a bridge too far blaming the viewers for their ridiculous programming choices. They successfully managed to alienate all the viewers who became accustomed to their broadcasting style, and send them packing. I removed them from my viewing list on youtube and will not watch their programming anymore they can blame someone else for their failings and shortcomings!
Ten years ago i would go to CNN for international news ... now i depend on TDLR and their channels
I remembering paying to view CNN until just after the Trump/Clinton election when CNN’s opinions just got too opinionated, and I’m a Canadian🇨🇦❤️🇺🇸
CNN is free in America and we don't even watch it because it's a propaganda media.
Cable news has always been that way it's not real news. Fox is the same thing
CNN is boring. Two much on politics and politicians repeating the same thing they said yesterday and the day before. CNN is unbalanced to one topic and most airtime is opinion. Let people draw their own conclusions. No more opinions from Sen. LieAlot.
Canadians thinking they can't handle opinion is a non-starter for US audiences who can; often, just not too often, opinions are welcome in getting a handle on how people in another political zoo otherwise "think". When the opinion sticks with being too opinionated by rightwingers, a minute or two causes more than enough for any but their audience to bail. Left opinion actually in the US is stretched across media enough for us to keep listening. The fact the Reicht really only has Fox Snooze and 2 tiny nothingburgers of disinfirmation misleads observers to think they represent the entire country. They don't. See the antiTrump majorities over the last several elections for a clue.
If tldr is to mean anything to the young outside of high school age, it should be nonstop Progressive. Which is how 90% of them vote. tldr is too childlike to even attempt it.
@@craigbhill1
Really enjoying the business content recently. This type of explainer that gives insight into how massive corporations work is particularly interesting. Keep it up 🙏
Well maybe if everyone told real news instead of biased opinions on both sides people might actually like watching news again
A "declining force in a shrinking market". The statement one hopes they will never have to hear. 💀💀💀💀
The main problem is that cable has become sort of semi-obsolete, like radio before it. Sure, it will never 100% disappear, but it’s glory days are long over. Cable might be able to reinvent itself with services like twitch, but that’s about it. They will have to continue to do some cuts, as the competition between twitter, TH-cam and to some extent twitch for information content is very high
Twitter, TH-cam, and Facebook are already dinosaurs. If you're on a site that censors content, you're looking at propaganda, not information.