Overall, this is a positive direction for the aviation industry. Innovation and sustainability should be at the forefront of every new aircraft design.
As expected, this is a marketing video and the title is clickbait. (You can spot clickbait a mile off with its superlatives.) The video does not explain which new aircraft it is referring to nor why or how it is shocking everyone. Or even enthusiasts such as myself.
Airplane design is as much a product of delicate Politics as it is Engineering and Design. In saying that, Airbus would be remiss in not pursuing a 2000 version of the A350 - and they most probably will be. After all, Airbus don't want to be issuing media statements that Boeing has ready access to when it comes to the aforementioned Politics involved in potential new Airplane designs. A new airframe can be used to test new technologies, powerplants and materials. One of the issues I would foresee in a 200 version is we would now have an aircraft capable in flying non stop Auckland to Heathrow, without the lucrative stop over in Dubai. I am sure Airlines such as Emirates would have something to say about that - and we go back to what I have already said about delicate Politics. Blended wing designs are for the far future (at least thirty years hence), and exist primarily as testbeds for more relevant technologies. As an Aeronautical Design Engineer it's never been a better time to work for Airbus, and had I been twenty years younger I certainly would be!
The new aircraft for AIRBUS 0:42, In the future of Materials for AIRBUS 4:02, Wing design for AIRBUS 5:04 and AIRBUS A350-2000 xwb/ulr 6:16 ? Wow ! What a great idea, Indonesian National Aviation would like to buy and add about the new AIRBUS types like this. Because, I need Indonesian National Aviation over the BOEING for the future.
Although hydrogen has an energy density by weight over 3 times that of kerosene, the specific gravity of liquid hydrogen is less than 1/10 of kerosene. This means a liquid hydrogen powered plane’s fuel tanks will need to be 3 times the volume. What’s more the tanks will have to be insulated pressure vessels making them way heavier than what is required for kerosene. I think all this talk of hydrogen powered and carbon neutral aviation is nothing other than virtue signalling. The only true solution to the degradation of the planet is human extinction. But why worry, the sun has only a billion or so years of stable burning before it goes berserk and engulfs earth. Meanwhile the universe itself will likely go on for hundreds of billions of years beyond that as if we, and everything else in the solar system never existed.😂
Got news for you, Boeing unveiled all of these years ago. They are even building a test plane for a transonic truss-braced wing aircraft right now and its expected to be finished by next year, and they hope to determine if it is commercial viable by the late 2020's and have it in service by 2030, they have been working on it since 2016, 5 years before Airbus announced any of these aircraft. They also already stated how they are waiting for the new CMF Rise Engine which they have been working on to design a new engine, an engine they have been working on since the early 90's. Then there is the BWB, also known as the X-48 which Boeing has been working on since 2007, and even proposed a 737 replacement to use that tech in the 2010's. So, no, Airbus just copied and pasted Boeing on this.
Well Boeing is going to have to get the 777X to market and the 737-7 and -10 first. They cannot seem to get their own upgraded designs signed off by the FAA. So, I think you may want to rethink those dates.
@@mld3pmtsu I am only going by what is in the press releases. But I don't think you are 100% correct though. Yes the 777X will definitely get into the skies, but there is growing concern at Boeing that the -7 and -10 may never get into the skies. Also, the new transonic wing brase tester is in a complete separate part of the company. Remember, Boeing isn't just commercial planes, in fact its not even the largest portion of their business. They have a huge defense contractor and modification and R&D department and the new aircraft is with them right now. Those areas are working perfectly fine. Also the testing is partly funded by NASA. So that will get pretty far before it needs to cross over to the commercial side of the business.
You're not paying attention are you? Airbus announced these aircraft in 2022. Boeing started working on the high wing trust aircraft in 2016. They started working on the new exposed turbo fan engines in the 90's, the BWB aircraft in 2007, hydrogen powers aircraft in the 60's and has part ownership in a company based in Washington state that is awaiting FAA certification right now on their first passenger variant which will begin carrying passengers hopefully by next year. But let's move back further, Boeing proposed the first all double decker aircraft in the mid 90's the 747X. Boeing proposed create the 787 in 2003 as the first all composite aircraft with lower cabin pressure. Airbus didn't propose the A380 until 2000, and then copied and pasted the 787 and made it the A350 in 2004 when it was clear no one wanted the A380. The reason why Airbus seems to be more successful...take a look at the $7.5 billion in unfair loans the WTO rules supported JUST THE A380 and A350 programs. Look at how France forgave the loans and pushed Germany to do the same for the A380 when the program failed. Look at the 2020, $3.9 billion dollar bribery scheme the US and UK stated that Airbus had been bringing airlines to buy there products as far back as the 90's. Oh, and how Air Asia's CEO was forced to step down and pay a $10 million dollar fee, and how Airbus went on a apology tour paying fees all around the world primitively.
Looks like Airbus is making all the right moves to stay on top of the industry.
I appreciate Airbus’s focus on environmentally friendly aircraft. The industry needs to take significant steps towards sustainability.
The collaboration with Rolls-Royce on fuel efficiency is a smart move. Sustainable aviation is definitely the future.
Not just with RR.
Good news! Airbus seems to be leading the industry
🤡
@@VROMVROMad Boeing fanboy? 😱💢
@@devknochen bro there are so many of them just spewing hate on thus poor guys comments 😂
Probably a good video, but I don't watch videos with “shocked” in the title anymore.
I agree, it annoys me too.
Ditto! Why the clickbait on a video like this?
Good choice, all old news in this video.
This is the kind of innovation that will keep Airbus ahead of the competition.
Airbus is really stepping up! This new aircraft could be a game-changer for the industry.
Can’t wait to see how this new aircraft impacts the future of air travel.
Its fascinating to see Airbus push the boundaries of technology again. A next-generation aircraft could reshape the market!
Airbus needs a Electrical option as well. I wish them all the best.
Excited to see what Airbus and Rolls-Royce come up with for narrow-body jets.
I despise bait titles as in this one.
Airbus really knows how to stay ahead of the curve with these advancements.
please stop these shitty clickbait titels! 😡
With the push for eco-friendly planes, Airbus is taking the lead in sustainability.
The advancements in materials could lead to lighter, more efficient aircraft. I can’t wait to see what they come up with!
With Boeing struggling, this is a prime opportunity for Airbus to capture market share. They need to make the most of it.
True, but they already are number one in passenger planes. The way Americans invest in Airbus tells a lot.
Im curious about the wing design changes. Aerodynamics play such a crucial role in fuel efficiency and performance.
A next-gen aircraft with better fuel efficiency? That’s what we need right now!
Overall, this is a positive direction for the aviation industry. Innovation and sustainability should be at the forefront of every new aircraft design.
It's true.
As expected, this is a marketing video and the title is clickbait. (You can spot clickbait a mile off with its superlatives.) The video does not explain which new aircraft it is referring to nor why or how it is shocking everyone. Or even enthusiasts such as myself.
Bwb design looks stealth
With Boeing struggling, this feels like Airbus’s moment to shine.
Can people stop exaggerat everything after a while nobody will take you serious.
You're exaggerating
What kind of English is this?
Can kind of things are you talking about?
Exactly bro
For your information, that should be “exaggerating” and “seriously”.
Airbus focusing on fuel efficiency? That’s going to attract a lot of attention from airlines and passengers alike!
…and maybe even Greta Thunberg too!!!🤣
Shocked everyone? Evolution in fuel efficiency is not a shock to anyone. Hydrogen prototypes have been known for ages. Your video is melodrama!
An A350-2000? If that happens, it could really compete with Boeings offerings in the long-haul market.
It could really compete with Boeing 😂 Airbus is so far ahead by now..
When used together, the first two words of your title are incorrect. Hope you do better with the content.
I got it!
@@FLIGAVIA 🙂
Yes but how many airlines only use a high density layout in their wide bodied aircraft?
hydrogen as fuel is fundamentally flawed. it takes more to make the fuel than it takes to fly on regular fuel.
In a world with only TWO major players and their 5 to 7 year back-orders, the term competition is ... 'entertaining'.
Note that the second player is the cooperation between Russians and Chinese
Airbus is doing OK, but this is just a corporate promo. You should pay YT for it.
Well the tile said new airbus plane?
The v wing design is airbus copying nature first the beluga and now the manta ray
bring something like the rbs very reliable and powerful engine
So what exactly is the 'shock'?
Airplane design is as much a product of delicate Politics as it is Engineering and Design. In saying that, Airbus would be remiss in not pursuing a 2000 version of the A350 - and they most probably will be. After all, Airbus don't want to be issuing media statements that Boeing has ready access to when it comes to the aforementioned Politics involved in potential new Airplane designs. A new airframe can be used to test new technologies, powerplants and materials. One of the issues I would foresee in a 200 version is we would now have an aircraft capable in flying non stop Auckland to Heathrow, without the lucrative stop over in Dubai. I am sure Airlines such as Emirates would have something to say about that - and we go back to what I have already said about delicate Politics. Blended wing designs are for the far future (at least thirty years hence), and exist primarily as testbeds for more relevant technologies. As an Aeronautical Design Engineer it's never been a better time to work for Airbus, and had I been twenty years younger I certainly would be!
Where is the Valiant model, Brooklands maybe?
nice
thanks
When you let a robot do a persons job
Meanwhile the Yanks are being left behind.
Anyway boeing and airbus aircraft still the best choices..say no to the other country passenger aircraft products.
Ilyushin, Antonov, Tupolev, Embraer, Bombardier
Airbus YES, Boing NO!
@@v1qurisyou joking right 😂
@@chespocket1756 They are like the best planes like airbus
The new aircraft for AIRBUS 0:42, In the future of Materials for AIRBUS 4:02, Wing design for AIRBUS 5:04 and AIRBUS A350-2000 xwb/ulr 6:16 ? Wow ! What a great idea, Indonesian National Aviation would like to buy and add about the new AIRBUS types like this. Because, I need Indonesian National Aviation over the BOEING for the future.
The 25% reduction in fuel emissions sounds promising. I hope they can deliver on that with real-world performance.
Click bait titles will cause you to lose subscribers. For example, I put you in my ignored list.
Hydrogen? remember the hindenburg.
flying? remember Icarus!!
Yes where are we going to get all this hydrogen from
Same way we got kerosene, first aircraft before jet age didn't use kerosene.
It’s green hydrogen to be specific
Why not use zero-point energy for propulsion?🤔
Ms Kitcher does not need to "share" with me, she can simply tell me, that is fine by me...
I absolutely love these Clickbait titles. As if anybody is"shocked" by a new airplane.😂
Technical word salad.
Hydrogen airplane that's really dumb idea.
I don't think so
they could use a electric motor instead of that stupid hydrogen thing
It will depend on the price and availability but is perfectly non polluting and could be used on big ship machinery too and much more.
Its exciting to see such innovation in narrow-body jets. This could open up new routes and possibilities for airlines.
Yep.
Who is shocked? NOW NOW ??? Just general information and marketing extracts. Click bait. Not recommending this channel.
Hydrogen??? Didn't we learn from the Hindenburg? Just give me Jet-A and leave it alone!!
Although hydrogen has an energy density by weight over 3 times that of kerosene, the specific gravity of liquid hydrogen is less than 1/10 of kerosene. This means a liquid hydrogen powered plane’s fuel tanks will need to be 3 times the volume. What’s more the tanks will have to be insulated pressure vessels making them way heavier than what is required for kerosene.
I think all this talk of hydrogen powered and carbon neutral aviation is nothing other than virtue signalling.
The only true solution to the degradation of the planet is human extinction. But why worry, the sun has only a billion or so years of stable burning before it goes berserk and engulfs earth. Meanwhile the universe itself will likely go on for hundreds of billions of years beyond that as if we, and everything else in the solar system never existed.😂
Yea but Boeing aircraft fall apart!!!😂
bla bla bla all concept what so shocking . maybe in a few decades
I ain't flying on that Shi I'd happily cancel my flight 😊
Explain please
Fr
@@MySkyranger🤡🤡🤡
@@MySkyrangerWTH😂😂
@@MySkyranger what do I need go to explain
Way too much bull before addressing the titled subject !
Got news for you, Boeing unveiled all of these years ago. They are even building a test plane for a transonic truss-braced wing aircraft right now and its expected to be finished by next year, and they hope to determine if it is commercial viable by the late 2020's and have it in service by 2030, they have been working on it since 2016, 5 years before Airbus announced any of these aircraft. They also already stated how they are waiting for the new CMF Rise Engine which they have been working on to design a new engine, an engine they have been working on since the early 90's. Then there is the BWB, also known as the X-48 which Boeing has been working on since 2007, and even proposed a 737 replacement to use that tech in the 2010's. So, no, Airbus just copied and pasted Boeing on this.
Well Boeing is going to have to get the 777X to market and the 737-7 and -10 first. They cannot seem to get their own upgraded designs signed off by the FAA. So, I think you may want to rethink those dates.
@@mld3pmtsu I am only going by what is in the press releases. But I don't think you are 100% correct though. Yes the 777X will definitely get into the skies, but there is growing concern at Boeing that the -7 and -10 may never get into the skies. Also, the new transonic wing brase tester is in a complete separate part of the company. Remember, Boeing isn't just commercial planes, in fact its not even the largest portion of their business. They have a huge defense contractor and modification and R&D department and the new aircraft is with them right now. Those areas are working perfectly fine. Also the testing is partly funded by NASA. So that will get pretty far before it needs to cross over to the commercial side of the business.
Yep, content is not consistent with the headline. Click bait!!! I am not going to subscribe.
So much useless content to get to the 10 minutes mark and on top you get a click bait title. You will not grow with this strategy
Thanks for your view and your suggestion
This guys to pro Airbus not good.
Airbus development concept, make a better airplane. Boeing development concept copy airbus but cost cut and make it more profitable.
You're not paying attention are you? Airbus announced these aircraft in 2022. Boeing started working on the high wing trust aircraft in 2016. They started working on the new exposed turbo fan engines in the 90's, the BWB aircraft in 2007, hydrogen powers aircraft in the 60's and has part ownership in a company based in Washington state that is awaiting FAA certification right now on their first passenger variant which will begin carrying passengers hopefully by next year. But let's move back further, Boeing proposed the first all double decker aircraft in the mid 90's the 747X. Boeing proposed create the 787 in 2003 as the first all composite aircraft with lower cabin pressure. Airbus didn't propose the A380 until 2000, and then copied and pasted the 787 and made it the A350 in 2004 when it was clear no one wanted the A380. The reason why Airbus seems to be more successful...take a look at the $7.5 billion in unfair loans the WTO rules supported JUST THE A380 and A350 programs. Look at how France forgave the loans and pushed Germany to do the same for the A380 when the program failed. Look at the 2020, $3.9 billion dollar bribery scheme the US and UK stated that Airbus had been bringing airlines to buy there products as far back as the 90's. Oh, and how Air Asia's CEO was forced to step down and pay a $10 million dollar fee, and how Airbus went on a apology tour paying fees all around the world primitively.
what is this nonsense video
More BS from this channel
Keep hating on boeing and you will get expose soon
Your channel is nothing more than an Airbus advertising Boeing Bashing toilet.
Just because Boeing has too much negative news
Boeing screwed itself!
WHY is BS