Why the SSL 4000 is PERFECT for Getting GREAT Mixes FAST

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 10 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 23

  • @vektacular
    @vektacular 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I really love the ssl 9000J and the second place one to me would be the SSL 4000 G

  • @jspacone
    @jspacone 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I never really thought about it before - this SSL channel strip has practically everything you need, all in one place. Some of this, and maybe a little reverb, and you're golden!

  • @rainbroski
    @rainbroski 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    So informative, loving your channel so far !!

    • @cravenoise
      @cravenoise  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you! I’m glad you’re enjoying it!

  • @MoreMeRecording
    @MoreMeRecording 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I love the 4000 but also love the discernible difference with the 9000 as well for tracks I want a little more transparent and sound of perceived higher headroom. I got a deal on the Waves SSL channel and it get a lot of play, especially on guitars and drums.

  • @dylanjastle
    @dylanjastle 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Nicely done man. I going to see if I can pick up one of these plugins on mega sale this year! It does it all

    • @cravenoise
      @cravenoise  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks man! If you happen to have a subscription to Slate Digital, they include all of SSL’s plugins as well!

  • @roommother3398
    @roommother3398 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great video! Mix sounds spot on as well. Thanks!

    • @cravenoise
      @cravenoise  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      thanks so much for watching!

  • @Harrysound
    @Harrysound 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    it would be great if you released the stems, I'd love to have a go at mixing it

    • @cravenoise
      @cravenoise  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I would love to do something like that! Unfortunately I can’t do it with this song but I definitely want to make multitracks available in the future.

  • @DenisVolga
    @DenisVolga หลายเดือนก่อน

    Such a nice review, with normal speech and voice, but music..can't call it music. Just had to comment because almost all reviews of plugins are with horrible examples. I don't care is it garbage or a high-quality garbage - garbage is garbage. Okay, gross people, you can attack me after this...i don't care: this are my tastes and opinions, that have logical and practical foundations.
    SSL is nice. I like that fooling around with them bring unexpected results.

  • @shawnmorgan7839
    @shawnmorgan7839 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    Both mixes are subpar by todays standards. sorry bro

    • @cravenoise
      @cravenoise  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      lol i don’t know what that means

    • @adirsab
      @adirsab 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      it dosent matter. the point of the video is what's really matters..

    • @tixxrz7180
      @tixxrz7180 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@cravenoisebro just talking 😂😂need to get away from his keyboard

    • @robertfoshizzle
      @robertfoshizzle 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Mixing is so subjective... with this style of music, the artist and producer may be going for more of a lo-fi sound that is reminiscent of independent punk albums of the '80s and '90s. The mix isn't to my personal taste, but I also don't typically listen to this style of music. I'm not getting the impression the presenter is out of his depth by any means -- judging by his work environment, I assume he's not working out out of a professional studio, but I think his knowledge and explanation of the SSL 4000 plugin is good info, much of which I wasn't previously aware of.

    • @estesfamily6761
      @estesfamily6761 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Yeah those mixes sound flat

  • @alexanderkhait
    @alexanderkhait 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Why do you have to behave badly?

    • @cravenoise
      @cravenoise  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@alexanderkhait FREEDOM!!