@@ajinabrahamgeorge There is no secularism in your religion. Only single god and if you are not worshipping him you will commit sin and straight away go to hell …Why you poke in other religion issues .
@@thevantagepoint8464 All religions are not secular . Some are more marshal . Only country more secular is India . Hinduism is also like other religions . Your religions are not secular but you pose to outside world as sickular..what is this double game?
@@ajinabrahamgeorge becoz secular high courts and secular parliaments are poking their nose in the personal religious temples.. What if I enter your home, without your permission and breaking your privacy enter your bedroom, while your wife is in her private space, and say that this is India and constitution has given me rights to do whatever I want.. Same is the case with Sabarimala, it's our religious private space, where there are certain rules for us, we only with deeksha with certain gender limits and age limits can enter the temple.. No other fuckin dogs has right to question..
Malayalees made way and let the woman enter. now what happened? Kerala a land with no big natural calamities in recent history got three years of consecutive mega flood, after they entered 😂 because they played against the god who protected them.
Sai Deepak is nothing but talk. Right from the very start I had pegged him as a Hindu conman with a Tilak on his forehead and a perpetual grievance on this tongue ready to exploit the emotions of the underclass. Soon he will be a BJP legislator and the looting will begin.
“Feminists” understand that the logic behind religion and it’s questionable practices. If religion is so perfect then why did men oppress women in the very first place? Did any religion help women? Why was it accepted in this so called progressive religion. Blind worshipping is dangerous and the history is bound to repeat. As a woman you should know that.
@lalitanault First of all, you're not a woman. Second, do not use a word as sensitive as "feminism" so casually. Just because you have more authority in the society for being a man does not give you the right to trample on an idea which women built. It is similar to how the idea of Brahmachari temple works.
@@willowcrisp lol, yeah, I was born a woman, can't argue a principle, so go for the personal attack. You need to work on your communication strategies. I don't need to prove my femininity to anyone, lol get some mental health assistance, you seem angry.
@@balajayaraman4465yes we do . What has that education done for ? The freedom to openly practice one's faith , economic development and true skill oriented learning has never reached you . That education you brad about is a agenda propogated by the cbse since the nehruvian era .For your kind info , this guy is also a South Indian.
@@devadharshini1122 aren't they going to the temple to pray to him ? Doesn't Hinduism teach us to be inclusive ... What kind of God are you talking about who is selective in choosing his followers ?
@@uttaransaha1941 more than praying we express our gratitude for what they have given to us and praying for him would make no difference cause hindus always believe in one true god and he is in many forms , humans, insects, non-living stuffs it's about worshipping that and Savin his creation and being thankful.
@@shhrage why do u insist on deflecting from the issue ... How is all the things u said possible if half the Hindu population isn't allowed to enter that temple ? .... What are u going to say next , the only way to show devotions is to let Brahmins have it all and offer it to the gods ?
6-48-11 Valmiki Ramayana 11. maamakau = my; stanau = breasts; aviralau = are close to each other; piinau = fully developed; magna chuuchukau = and have depressed nipples; naabhiH = my navel; magnaa = is deeply; utsedhinii = indented; me = my; paarshvoraskamcha = flanks and bossom; chitam = are well-formed. "My breasts are close to each other, fully developed and have depressed nipples. My navel is deeply idented. My flanks and bossom are well-formed
@@rjakbar read this full aklund 😂😂 👇🏼 Chapter 48 - Sita’s Lamentations < Previous parent: Book 6 - Yuddha-kanda Next > Seeing her lord lying on the earth as also the valiant Lakshmana, Sita, in the grief that overwhelmed her, gave voice to her complaint, saying:- “The soothsayers, reading the lineaments of my body, prophesized thus:- ‘You shaft bear sons and never be widowed!’-now that Rama has been slain, their words have proved to be untrue I Since Rama is slain, those who predicted that I should be the companion and consort of the performer of great sacrifices, have uttered a falsehood! Now that Rama has been slain, those soothsayers, who told me I should be highly honoured by the wives of warriors and kings, are proved not to have spoken truly! Now that Rama has been slain, the astrologers among the brahmins, who openly foretold happiness for me, are proved to have spoken falsely! “Yet I bear the marks of the lotus on my feet by which high-born women receive the supreme consecration with their lords at their coronation nor do I find in myself any marks of ill-fortune which betoken widowhood in those who are ill-starred, yet all the auspicious signs appear to be rendered void for me! These marks of the lotus, said to be of good augury by the Pundits, have no meaning for me, now that Rama is slain! “My locks are fine, of even length and dark, my eyebrows meet, my legs are round and smooth, my teeth evenly separated, the comers of my eyes are shaped like the conch, my breasts, hands, feet and thighs well proportioned, my nails smooth and polished, my fingers well-shaped, my breasts touch each other and have depressed nipples, my navel too is deeply indented, my bosom well-formed, my complexion has the sheen of a pearl, the down on my skin is soft. It is said I possess the twelve auspicious signs: my feet and hands are without hollows and marked with the barley corn and my smile is langorous. Thus did those, who interpret the marks of youthful maidens, speak of me. “Having purified Janasthana, received the tidings of my fate and crossed the impassable ocean, those two brothers have perished in the imprint of a cow’s hoof. Did they not recollect (that they possessed) the arrows of Varuna, Agni, Indra and Vayu, as also the Brahmashira weapon? “By means of magic arts, an invisible foe has slain those two, Rama and Lakshmana, my protectors, who are equal to Vasava in combat and I am now bereft of any support. Nay, if he had come into Rama’s presence, he would not have returned alive even were he possessed of the swiftness of thought but since Rama and his brother are lying struck down on the battlefield, there is no burden too heavy for death to shoulder! Fate is inexorable. I do not weep so much for Rama and Lakshmana or for myself or my mother but for my unfortunate mother-in-law, Kaushalya, who dwells constantly on her son’s return after fulfilling his vows, she who asks herself, ‘When shall I behold Lakshmana and Sita with Raghava once more?’” Thus did Janaki lament and Trijata said to her:-“Do not despair, O Goddess, your lord lives! I will tell you what powerful considerations have convinced me that those two brothers, Rama and Lakshmana still live, O Queen. They are, that resolution and martial ardour do not animate the faces of soldiers who have lost their leader, neither would the celestial car, Pushpaka, have brought you hither, O Vaidehi, if those two heroes had succumbed. An army that sees its valiant commander fall is bereft of courage and wanders aimlessly about on the battlefield like a ship which has lost its rudder. Yet there is neither confusion nor disorder among the intrepid forces that mount guard over the two Kakutsthas. I am pointing this out to you on account of mine affection for you. These auspicious omens should re-assure you fully, for know well, the two Kakutsthas are not dead, I hasten to tell you this out of love for you. “I have never spoken what is not true to you nor shall I ever do so, O Maithili, for by your conduct and natural gaiety you have found a place in my heart! Nay, those two warriors are not able to be vanquished even by the Gods and Asuras with their leaders. This is what I have observed and communicate to you. Yea, there is a great marvel to be seen, O Maithili; behold how, fallen under those shafts and deprived of their senses, their beauty has not deserted them. “In the natural course, when men have lost their lives, their features exhibit appalling alteration, it is therefore impossible that these two do not still live. Banish your grief on account of Rama and Lakshmana, abandon your sorrow, O Daughter of Janaka!” At these words, Sita, who resembled a daughter of the Gods, with joined palms, exclaimed “May it be so!” Meanwhile the Chariot Pushpaka, swift as the wind, had returned and the plaintive Sita re-entered the city with Trijata, whereupon descending from the car, she entered the Ashoka Grove with the female titans. Having returned to the royal enclosure planted with innumerable trees, Sita, recalling the two princes whom she had just seen, became a prey to extreme grief.
what a foolish thing to say, the "religious place" he is talking about, is that in a secular country or on the land of a specific religion's nation? Aise tho sab apne mandir bana dege har jagah "secular" country me, or religious jaga hai bolke maa chodd dege unity in diversity ki!!
Don't say you will not say....that is what was not practiced in our religion. I am also a Hindu....but by being loud you have outrightly diminished every explanation. Of you can't be humble you cannot be Hindu. You are no Hindu, you are here to earn money infornt of several people. This is my comment I am just pasting it everywhere with looking what was commented.
As a woman I fully support JSD here.. Almost all Hindu temples are open for me.... So I don't mind not getting entry in one temple of brahmachari deity.
@@srinivasavarmaghantasala8961 It's a historical fact. Most people that boast about Hinduism weren't even allowed to enter their own temples (Welp, Hindus didn't really have the concept of temples but ok)
@@___GM___ Because of its rules, rituals. See, its diety 's mandir, so you go by his rules. Remember, you are worshipping him, he is not worshipping you. If you can't follow the rules and regulations of that mandir in particular, then dont go there. Simple. What strawman argument did he use?
@@___GM___ Not every brahmachari are same, sir. Every one of them has different philosophies and way of worship. How can you have ven think of comparing Ganesha and Ayyappa, who are totally different gods?
@@nagarajanm2060 Hindus never had fear. They are and always doing "manmani". Muslim is a created enemy by ruling party to make gullible Hindus believe they are in danger. The truth is that it is the minorities that are always in danger in India. And Hindus themselves have no fear of God, nor do they have any morals. Becoz their religion allows them to follow any path. No rules, no restrictions so live like animals!!
Don't say you will not say....that is what was not practiced in our religion. I am also a Hindu....but by being loud you have outrightly diminished every explanation. Of you can't be humble you cannot be Hindu. You are no Hindu, you are here to earn money infornt of several people. This is my comment I am just pasting it everywhere with looking what was commented.
100% agree to this guy.. hats off to you sir🫡. I am a Malayali Christian, we respect all the swamis coming here. Secular logic shouldn't be applied to a place of worship.
I am a women and i totally support him .i have seen my father and brothers go there every single years .i my self has gone there till the age of 12 . Its absolutely magical .🙏
So why don't u want to go when u are 25 or 32 or whenever u feel like?? God is God right? Even if he is brahmachari? Or ur afraid he will get tempted by the pretty women ( I am not an atheist! But I'm forced to ask this because I believe God is above everything and these bullshit restrictions make God sound like a Shady Neighbour uncle)
@@tenebrismedicus2956 There are rules in every thing in our life, a man can never go to a women's bathroom because it's a rule and you follow it. Just like that there is a rule for a religious practice, it doesn't matter if you like it or not, or what you think. The only thing that matters is you just follow the rules, why it is so hard for you people to follow rules.
@@soumalyamazumdar3083 the rule should have a logic and clear explanation with proofs We can’t simply follow if some bullshit (rules) are set in the name of religion or god What to do We are humans right😂
@@vijaypagalavanwomen is women we don’t want young womens in temple cause all r with bhramachari diksha women is for wishes so if men seen women he can’t control himself
@@LarrysJournal well then, instead of being a troll on the internet and making fun of the guy why don't you explain to him why you said what you said so that he can understand your POV??
He is wrong ..... not the secular logic but WOMEN RIGHT FOR EQUALITY logic being applied for women entry.... He is trying to divert by saying irrelevant but influential lines here....
@@M12m34 you were wrong. They are not denying all women for entry but a particular age group. If you want to fight for women's gender equality rights first go and get the rights for women to enter in mosque.Then come here we will talk
@@vamsisaggurthi5528 People's fundamental rights have more value than your religious logic. It is untouchability and it's shameful that we are still continuing this. The court understood that; that's why the court's verdict allowed women's entry into Sabarimala. According to your religious logic, you would still be able to justify untouchability, but nowadays nobody cares about what the religious logic behind untouchability is. That's how civilization evolves. The same will happen to Sabarimala as well.
@@vimalmanikandan4716 first understand the meaning of untouchability. They are not denying any particular caste or race from entering into temple. It's just particular age group. If these women want to visit sabarimala they can do it before they attain pubarty and after their menopage. No one will restrict them. Its you people who doesn't have any knowledge about untouchability,discrimination,gender bias pouring all the dirt into peoples mind. If you have that much concern about womens right all the women are not allowed into worship places in a specific religion. Go fight for them and come here after that.
@@georgecarlinn6288hurch stairs should be paint like Hgbtq and Instead of Jeßus Christ lets say Jay Shree jeßus and Instead of Christmas lets make it Christmas jayanti
Totally understandable! As a woman I'll stay away from a temple made for a brahmachari deity! Why, there are plenty other temples in our country. If I want to worship, do pujas and all, I'll go there. Why go somewhere where there's restrictions? I don't support this hypocrite secularism!
that's what any religious women's ideology would be....all those who women who supported that shameful act either weren't religious or were the ones who knew very less about shabarimala
I don't understand, even there r women who sphincter,if brahmachari deity is special and celebrated,we have Kanyakumari, who is sphincter, deity,where all of can visit,we men r allowed there, why her bramachariya isn't celebrated and why the ritual r performed by men😢,Ur logic has no validation.
@@ThamizhiAaseevagar I don't know why you have to worship in a place where there is a rule like that. A true devotee can worship his/her deity in their home as well. In our country there is no scarcity of temples. If you want to do Puja, go anywhere. God is always residing in your heart either way. Do Puja, mentally, at home or in temples, your prayers will all go to one place. Those who question this are only looking for creating more chaos.
Totally agree . Out Hindu Temple have rules and we follow them . It does not matter to us if anyone agrees to it or not . It is our business. No secularism applies to our Temples. Period.
@@imran4006 no one has ayyapa in house because he is naistika bramhachari where as Hanuman can be seen in houses bcz he is bramhachari(not naistika).naistika bramcharyam is done with complete celibacy and away from society
@@imran4006 that is subramanya Swami different from ayyapa but then again some people take liberties and no one questions strictly because it's not a regulated religion.
How well does he articulates his thoughts into words...mere to dimag me bhi sentence nahi banenge Jo main kehna chahti hun... he's a true gem...hats off to Sai Deepak Sir
No he doesn't,,,,There was a time when lower caste men and women was Banned from sabarimala at that time then times changed and ban for men was lifted. Then there was a time men and women both went to sabarimala,,,, then with the temple act women of particular age was banned before that everybody was going,,,,, so this is not the will of god this is just the will of man. Just descrimination upon women
@@SadanBabuscorpionking that's ok bro, but it's not discrimination against women, there will be some reasons were women not allowed we should know the roots,why and what..
I know u are educated and have brains,,,,, i respect that,,,,,use your imagination bro,,,,, just imagine you are an ayyappa bhakthan and u are banned from entering sabarimala bcz u are from lower caste,,,, wont u feel descriminated
@@SadanBabuscorpionking bro I'm not much aware of the issue, but women were not allowed from years only this info I know, hope you can discuss with the people who have much knowledge on this. Thank you and take care bro
There was a time when lower caste men and women was Banned from sabarimala at that time then times changed and ban for men was lifted. Then there was a time men and women both went to sabarimala,,,, then with the temple act women of particular age was banned before that everybody was going,,,,, so this is not the will of god this is just the will of man.if nothin happened to ayyappa before nothing will happen if women go,,,, god won't mind to see his daughter visiting him
Simple logic. You go to temple so that you can aquire blessings and add to good deeds. Going to a temple when prohibited will have opposite effects. If you believe in the God, you don't defy the rituals.
tippu killed 60000 hindus in northern kerala and converted 10000 temples to mosques, and simply destroyed many temples and looted , make india hindu country in 2024 🕉️
@work204 So what. If faith says, it is sin to go to temple with certain condition, anyone who is faithful does not go. Only people who go there is to insult such faith goes to Temple. I don't go to masques to insult Islam. But their agents want the right to Insult Hindu faith.
There was a time when lower caste men and women was Banned from sabarimala at that time then times changed and ban for men was lifted. Then there was a time men and women both went to sabarimala,,,, then with the temple act women of particular age was banned before that everybody was going,,,,, so this is not the will of god this is just the will of man.if nothin happened to ayyappa before nothing will happen if women go,,,, god won't mind to see his daughter visiting him
He is wrong ..... not the secular logic but WOMEN RIGHT FOR EQUALITY logic being applied for women entry.... He is trying to divert by saying irrelevant but influential lines here....
@@M12m34 In Some Temples Men were not allowed will you apply same equality law at such places.All the set of guidelines prescribed as per the Sthala Purana of that particular temple most of the Hindus respects prescribed rules who the hell are you to question our Religious practices.
right for equality is invalid here this is as per religious text and i got i question if you are religious and would follow the text and if you arent then you wont want to go in a temple anyways but somepeople just want to interfere into things for fun some things are women exclusive acc to culture (like some specific vrats) but then its issue of women inferiority? and somethings are men exclusive then again it shows women inferiority wow logic dead
@@M12m34 ask this right to equality to muslims....muslims can marry 4 women.. Can a muslim girl can marry 4 Muslim men?? Fight for equality to muslim women...
I’m a woman and I’m a 100% with following the rules. Men are allowing to a have a worship place for themselves. I stand with you. I believe in how energy works and I stand with them
Ones sathi was banned by british its said that there was a March at kolkata by thousands of women roaring against british to reinstall sathi,,,,,im sure you will line up for that too
@@SadanBabuscorpionking Was the practice of sati practiced by all at that time? So how did the word widow originate? There were many widows in those days, how did they survive this practice? Admittedly it was an undesirable practice, but perhaps it was voluntary and some orthodox people tried to enforce it.
@@lalitdeshmukh9649 sathi was banned by William bentick on 1829,,,after that number of widows increased until widow remarriage act by canning on 1856,,,,,sathi was not practised by all i agree,,,, social evil is a social evil not matter the magnitude of people following it,,,,,, Once lower caste people were totally banned from same sabarimala then it was cancelled and eveybody were going there irrespective of gender,,,,,, but when the temple act came women of particular age were banned,,,,, so this is a ban by human not by god,,, same as sathi which was made by people,,, if sathi is bad this also is bad. Now sathi is bad prohibition of women is good,,,, after some years new generation will mock us for prohibiting women,,,,, so wake up
@@SadanBabuscorpionking seems like you are one of those who this statement in the main video applies to! There are few things which should not be disturbed not because of some social stigma but because of a higher amount of belief in existence and more! If you are still in denial, your loss!
First , ayyapa a brahmachari is contradictory , the temple near tranvancore potrates him as a married man with two wives . Second , it became fashion to say about secularism even thought there is nothing to do with it in particular matter , one thing indian secularism is every religion accepted not every religion is denied like France secularism so secularism is not anti religion its a pro religion .
Wait so you are saying the deity won't be able to control himself with a women around him ? By religious logic itself , the person is then not a Brahmachari
@@uttaransaha1941 he is not like Dallah/mudmud who can't control and fucks their grand daughters. Think before you try to disrespect other religions. Now go back to your home and save your sister from your grandfather
@@uttaransaha1941 no Its because he doesn't want male female energy to conflict There is some specific science related to energy behind this Please do some proper research before commenting Also only women of certain age group are not allowed Not all women
I am from Kerala were this temple is in. If the brahmachari deity don't want women to enter his temple and worship him why feminist want to enter that temple and worship him anyway? What is the logic in that?
Ayyappa resides in Sabarimala.... Ayyappa is a yogi practicing brahmachary Yogic concept has two types of energies The masculine energy and the feminine energy Ayyappa is in a mediating posture in Sabarimala and he said he is residing there To avoid conflict of yogic energies feminine and masculine, women in their adulthood are not allowed Sadhus or yogis be far from the public while they practice Brahmachary.... Just to avoid that conflict of energies.... It has nothing to do with menstruation... Once any women completes her adulthood they are allowed in the temple... Only women in their adulthood aren't allowed... When they are small or they grow beyond their adulthood they are allowed to the temple... In all other important ayyapa temples everyone are allowed Only because ayyappa resides in Sabarimala.... Which means it's like his house where he stays... As he is living deity in Sabarimala, the masculine energy will present in and around the shrine ... That's the reason women aren't allowed In Attukal Bagavathy temple mens are not allowed In kanyakumari temple mens are not allowed Does that mean discrimination? If dmb people don't know anything then don't brk like dgs The tantra being practiced in Kerala temples are totally different from other states Why mens are not allowed in Atukalamma temple or kanyakumari temple??? Even there it's the same concept.... Conflict of feminine and masculine yogic energies As the feminine energy will be present in and around the temple, mens are not to these temples Understand the culture of the land, simply mixing up with the blind beliefs of the north and judging a temple in south makes no sense There is hell lot of difference in the tantra kriya and karma kriya performed in the Kerala temples That's the reason we have temples where women aren't allowed and we also have temples where men are not allowed
But u cannot call people dumb if they ask questions.. U have explained it now because people are raising questions.. That's the problem with Hinduism, things are coming out now when there is competition from abrahamic cults and when feminists are asking questions.. Such things should be made available to all so that they don't even have to question.
@@creativeaarts4023these feminists don't question to understand and get an answer. They just want to act like cry babies, victims and make a propaganda
"You will not tolerate religious logic to secular places" Which means he knows and accepts the discriminatory nature of religious logics. And as long as there are religious places in India, by the same logic, religious logic should never be tolerated in any public place in India.
@@salvakhanali8739 I really have not seen jama masjid in Delhi or Saudi...but in reality, throughout my life till date, I have not seen any masjid at my surroundings, where women can go inside and prayer....I have many Muslim friends..... I am quite accustomed with their culture having zero level interest in interference therein...and I was never blamed in making thought less biased remark on anybody's religious belief or practice.....and statistically undoubtedly there are plenty number of masjids in india having enough place to accommodate plenty number of muslims both men and women in respect of number of temples in Saudi where the temple can hardly accommodate a priest.... Hindus might have misconceptions about Islam as this is still a foreign religion to them...but I do want to know your citizenship status and duration of your stay in India if you are an indian citizen in any way or other, and would like to ask you that how many of hindus in Saudi you think, can dare questioning their government's initiative in providing places for making enough number of spacious temples accommodating enough number of hindus being minority class in their country? HINDUS ARE EXCESSIVELY TOLERANT TO EVRY OTHER RELIGION AND TOO BRUTALLY SELF CRITIC REGARDING ANY KIND OF DISCRIMINATION.... Sometimes this excessive tolerance AND SELF CRITICISM wipe out their own identity....but it is hindus' family level characteristics where we are brought up being scolded by our parents while in each occasion, for not seeing own faults even when having none and we have learnt gratitude, tolerance, self criticism and are taught to appreciate and acknowledge fellow citizens' co- operation and philanthropism even when a hindu is a minority in any country. Though we are taught not to expect the same in back, but sometimes a humble reminder awakens conscience if it exists any way.
There was a time when lower caste men and women was Banned from sabarimala at that time then times changed and ban for men was lifted. Then there was a time men and women both went to sabarimala,,,, then with the temple act women of particular age was banned before that everybody was going,,,,, so this is not the will of god this is just the will of man.just someone tryna descriminate somenone
@@SadanBabuscorpionkingCan u tell me why Muslim and non muslim women are not allowed in M@sque but Muslim men are Answer me and stop copypasting This s##t just give me source of that first
"you will not tolerate religious logics to secular places"👏👏👏 what an sensible answer...
Why is religious logic being operated in the most secular Parliament of India then? That is not at all sensible!!
And what is all about this debate, what is the agenda of discussing a religious topic and logic at a secular place then.
@@ajinabrahamgeorge There is no secularism in your religion. Only single god and if you are not worshipping him you will commit sin and straight away go to hell …Why you poke in other religion issues .
@@thevantagepoint8464 All religions are not secular . Some are more marshal . Only country more secular is India . Hinduism is also like other religions . Your religions are not secular but you pose to outside world as sickular..what is this double game?
@@ajinabrahamgeorge becoz secular high courts and secular parliaments are poking their nose in the personal religious temples.. What if I enter your home, without your permission and breaking your privacy enter your bedroom, while your wife is in her private space, and say that this is India and constitution has given me rights to do whatever I want.. Same is the case with Sabarimala, it's our religious private space, where there are certain rules for us, we only with deeksha with certain gender limits and age limits can enter the temple.. No other fuckin dogs has right to question..
U said it better than any malayalee... thats the truth 💯 %
Malayalee
Malayalees made way and let the woman enter. now what happened? Kerala a land with no big natural calamities in recent history got three years of consecutive mega flood, after they entered 😂 because they played against the god who protected them.
@@Snorlax108 It has nothing to do.
@@warrior_1309it does actually , because it's a very big coincidence
@@user-lr1ke3bt8o Soul has no gender , it keeps on changing body .
Fantastic Deepak ji
Thank you for saving our culture
Sai Deepak is a great speaker.
Ohhh My Shiva......This Man has such clarity of thoughts......He needs to be at Commanding position.
th-cam.com/video/2TIwmgNS_wM/w-d-xo.htmlsi=LruGeBq0SBzIV7hr
He is Pandit getting lots of money from temple
@jonny
But you got both money and priestly shaft frm ur church
@@AmitSharma-sc9gg you Bammans have destroyed India through the cruel and heinous castes system.
Sai Deepak is nothing but talk. Right from the very start I had pegged him as a Hindu conman with a Tilak on his forehead and a perpetual grievance on this tongue ready to exploit the emotions of the underclass. Soon he will be a BJP legislator and the looting will begin.
As a woman, I totally agree. It is only toxic feminists who don't seem to understand this.
Feminists are toxic
As a woman I agree too
“Feminists” understand that the logic behind religion and it’s questionable practices. If religion is so perfect then why did men oppress women in the very first place? Did any religion help women? Why was it accepted in this so called progressive religion. Blind worshipping is dangerous and the history is bound to repeat. As a woman you should know that.
@lalitanault First of all, you're not a woman. Second, do not use a word as sensitive as "feminism" so casually. Just because you have more authority in the society for being a man does not give you the right to trample on an idea which women built. It is similar to how the idea of Brahmachari temple works.
@@willowcrisp lol, yeah, I was born a woman, can't argue a principle, so go for the personal attack. You need to work on your communication strategies. I don't need to prove my femininity to anyone, lol get some mental health assistance, you seem angry.
Jai ShreeRam 🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻
Awesome sir
"Knowledge enables you to speak clearly"
But this knowledge will make you bagger....
@@balajayaraman4465like you
@@anshbiswas2116 yes south indians are bagger but north indians are well educated. You trust him... all the best.
@@balajayaraman4465😂😂😂 avg brainwashed kid who is busy in South Indian and North india 😂😂😂
@@balajayaraman4465yes we do . What has that education done for ? The freedom to openly practice one's faith , economic development and true skill oriented learning has never reached you . That education you brad about is a agenda propogated by the cbse since the nehruvian era .For your kind info , this guy is also a South Indian.
That's why we need people with sensible and clear thinking like him.
Wait so Brahmachari won't be able to control himself with women around ?
@@uttaransaha1941 it's not about controlling! It's about respect. Know the difference.
@@devadharshini1122 aren't they going to the temple to pray to him ? Doesn't Hinduism teach us to be inclusive ... What kind of God are you talking about who is selective in choosing his followers ?
@@uttaransaha1941 more than praying we express our gratitude for what they have given to us and praying for him would make no difference cause hindus always believe in one true god and he is in many forms , humans, insects, non-living stuffs it's about worshipping that and Savin his creation and being thankful.
@@shhrage why do u insist on deflecting from the issue ... How is all the things u said possible if half the Hindu population isn't allowed to enter that temple ? .... What are u going to say next , the only way to show devotions is to let Brahmins have it all and offer it to the gods ?
Very very very true sir
The judges must broaden their horizons
Well said sir from kerala. Swamiye sharam ayyappa 🙏
He is 100% correct. And he is on point 🙏
6-48-11 Valmiki Ramayana
11. maamakau = my; stanau = breasts; aviralau = are close to each other; piinau = fully developed; magna chuuchukau = and have depressed nipples; naabhiH = my navel; magnaa = is deeply; utsedhinii = indented; me = my; paarshvoraskamcha = flanks and bossom; chitam = are well-formed.
"My breasts are close to each other, fully developed and have depressed nipples. My navel is deeply idented. My flanks and bossom are well-formed
@@rjakbar read this full aklund 😂😂
👇🏼
Chapter 48 - Sita’s Lamentations
< Previous
parent: Book 6 - Yuddha-kanda
Next >
Seeing her lord lying on the earth as also the valiant Lakshmana, Sita, in the grief that overwhelmed her, gave voice to her complaint, saying:-
“The soothsayers, reading the lineaments of my body, prophesized thus:-
‘You shaft bear sons and never be widowed!’-now that Rama has been slain, their words have proved to be untrue I Since Rama is slain, those who predicted that I should be the companion and consort of the performer of great sacrifices, have uttered a falsehood! Now that Rama has been slain, those soothsayers, who told me I should be highly honoured by the wives of warriors and kings, are proved not to have spoken truly! Now that Rama has been slain, the astrologers among the brahmins, who openly foretold happiness for me, are proved to have spoken falsely!
“Yet I bear the marks of the lotus on my feet by which high-born women receive the supreme consecration with their lords at their coronation nor do I find in myself any marks of ill-fortune which betoken widowhood in those who are ill-starred, yet all the auspicious signs appear to be rendered void for me! These marks of the lotus, said to be of good augury by the Pundits, have no meaning for me, now that Rama is slain!
“My locks are fine, of even length and dark, my eyebrows meet, my legs are round and smooth, my teeth evenly separated, the comers of my eyes are shaped like the conch, my breasts, hands, feet and thighs well proportioned, my nails smooth and polished, my fingers well-shaped, my breasts touch each other and have depressed nipples, my navel too is deeply indented, my bosom well-formed, my complexion has the sheen of a pearl, the down on my skin is soft. It is said I possess the twelve auspicious signs: my feet and hands are without hollows and marked with the barley corn and my smile is langorous. Thus did those, who interpret the marks of youthful maidens, speak of me.
“Having purified Janasthana, received the tidings of my fate and crossed the impassable ocean, those two brothers have perished in the imprint of a cow’s hoof. Did they not recollect (that they possessed) the arrows of Varuna, Agni, Indra and Vayu, as also the Brahmashira weapon?
“By means of magic arts, an invisible foe has slain those two, Rama and Lakshmana, my protectors, who are equal to Vasava in combat and I am now bereft of any support. Nay, if he had come into Rama’s presence, he would not have returned alive even were he possessed of the swiftness of thought but since Rama and his brother are lying struck down on the battlefield, there is no burden too heavy for death to shoulder! Fate is inexorable. I do not weep so much for Rama and Lakshmana or for myself or my mother but for my unfortunate mother-in-law, Kaushalya, who dwells constantly on her son’s return after fulfilling his vows, she who asks herself, ‘When shall I behold Lakshmana and Sita with Raghava once more?’”
Thus did Janaki lament and Trijata said to her:-“Do not despair, O Goddess, your lord lives! I will tell you what powerful considerations have convinced me that those two brothers, Rama and Lakshmana still live, O Queen. They are, that resolution and martial ardour do not animate the faces of soldiers who have lost their leader, neither would the celestial car, Pushpaka, have brought you hither, O Vaidehi, if those two heroes had succumbed. An army that sees its valiant commander fall is bereft of courage and wanders aimlessly about on the battlefield like a ship which has lost its rudder. Yet there is neither confusion nor disorder among the intrepid forces that mount guard over the two Kakutsthas. I am pointing this out to you on account of mine affection for you. These auspicious omens should re-assure you fully, for know well, the two Kakutsthas are not dead, I hasten to tell you this out of love for you.
“I have never spoken what is not true to you nor shall I ever do so, O Maithili, for by your conduct and natural gaiety you have found a place in my heart! Nay, those two warriors are not able to be vanquished even by the Gods and Asuras with their leaders. This is what I have observed and communicate to you. Yea, there is a great marvel to be seen, O Maithili; behold how, fallen under those shafts and deprived of their senses, their beauty has not deserted them.
“In the natural course, when men have lost their lives, their features exhibit appalling alteration, it is therefore impossible that these two do not still live. Banish your grief on account of Rama and Lakshmana, abandon your sorrow, O Daughter of Janaka!”
At these words, Sita, who resembled a daughter of the Gods, with joined palms, exclaimed “May it be so!”
Meanwhile the Chariot Pushpaka, swift as the wind, had returned and the plaintive Sita re-entered the city with Trijata, whereupon descending from the car, she entered the Ashoka Grove with the female titans.
Having returned to the royal enclosure planted with innumerable trees, Sita, recalling the two princes whom she had just seen, became a prey to extreme grief.
what a foolish thing to say, the "religious place" he is talking about, is that in a secular country or on the land of a specific religion's nation? Aise tho sab apne mandir bana dege har jagah "secular" country me, or religious jaga hai bolke maa chodd dege unity in diversity ki!!
@@rjakbar hey pig eater
Don't say you will not say....that is what was not practiced in our religion. I am also a Hindu....but by being loud you have outrightly diminished every explanation. Of you can't be humble you cannot be Hindu. You are no Hindu, you are here to earn money infornt of several people.
This is my comment I am just pasting it everywhere with looking what was commented.
As a woman I fully support JSD here..
Almost all Hindu temples are open for me.... So I don't mind not getting entry in one temple of brahmachari deity.
I'm guessing you're not a Dalit then
@@repentandseekChristi'm guessing you are not a goat
@@repentandseekChristhow many years u guys going to cry with this dalit theory on religion...
Find a new way to convert people
@@srinivasavarmaghantasala8961 It's a historical fact. Most people that boast about Hinduism weren't even allowed to enter their own temples (Welp, Hindus didn't really have the concept of temples but ok)
@@repentandseekChristokay so which random dalit is denied entry inside a temple..
I am hindu girl and i am with you jsd sir 😊
Superbly Spoken
Hat's Off to Advocate J. Saideepak. A real hindu warrior 🙏🙏🕉🕉🌹🌹🌷🌷❤❤😎😎😎😎
Jai Jai ShreeRam
Har Har Mahadev 🙏🙏 🕉🕉
That's so much more logic and rational thinking in J.Sai Deepakji's words.
He talks nonsense that any genuinely knowledgeable person would be able to call out.
@@work204 👈 my son abdool madarsachap 😂😂 only madarsachaps will come out with such madarsachap conclusions
@@work204 Here comes another son of gun
@@___GM___ Because of its rules, rituals. See, its diety 's mandir, so you go by his rules. Remember, you are worshipping him, he is not worshipping you. If you can't follow the rules and regulations of that mandir in particular, then dont go there. Simple. What strawman argument did he use?
@@___GM___ Not every brahmachari are same, sir. Every one of them has different philosophies and way of worship. How can you have ven think of comparing Ganesha and Ayyappa, who are totally different gods?
As a women I 100% agree with you
Huge respect for you Sir......
God almighty has gifted Sri J.Saideepak to hindus.
Golden words to be written down.
"You will not tolerate if secular logic is to be applied to all religious places"
Master stroke
It was the other way around. Religious logic to the secular places.😂
You wrote it wrong mate
It's the opposite 😂
U got it wrong
I am hindu girl and i am with you sir 😊😊😊😊❤❤❤
This man is great , always improving our knowledge, & defending the faith from ignorant fools
Super logic .. We are not secular..
U r our treasure sai.....never disappointing....hitting nail on head🎉🎉🎉 t
Well explained.
Protect this man. Absolutely talking sense
Protect him. Keep him in a glass case. Don't allow him among humans!
No need to protect.....bcos BJP rules now.
No worries.....Hindus should avoid fear....
@@nagarajanm2060 Hindus never had fear. They are and always doing "manmani". Muslim is a created enemy by ruling party to make gullible Hindus believe they are in danger. The truth is that it is the minorities that are always in danger in India. And Hindus themselves have no fear of God, nor do they have any morals. Becoz their religion allows them to follow any path. No rules, no restrictions so live like animals!!
He only till elections
yeah just like you do to kids in basement of churches @@jonathandome5318
“ you will not tolerate application of religious logic to secular places”, there you go brother, somebody is TALKING SENSE 🙏🏽
there is no such thing as religious logic, it's just a delusion
th-cam.com/users/shortsZqyZlFaNeuc?feature=share
th-cam.com/users/shortsZqyZlFaNeuc?feature=share
Don't say you will not say....that is what was not practiced in our religion. I am also a Hindu....but by being loud you have outrightly diminished every explanation. Of you can't be humble you cannot be Hindu. You are no Hindu, you are here to earn money infornt of several people.
This is my comment I am just pasting it everywhere with looking what was commented.
@@smitmishra8872 he is a lawyer bro. He earns his bread on that constitution to which he says is illogical.
Hats off sir ..very well said 🎉..thanks 🙏🙏
What a man he is......
Great of decades 🔥🔥
Because of this controversy, we got legends like Sai Deepak, Ranganathan and more.
Then in that case you must not keep pictures and statues of Ayyappa in your Houses where Women, your Mom, Wife, Sisters & Daughters live.
@@imran4006 i don't know why womens are not allowed to enter and pray in mosque ? Can you explain me brother 🤔
@@Abhik. well questioned. Come let's protest for women rights irrespective of religion 😁
@@pavinkumar0711 😄
@imran4006 why are you interested in this even after being Muslim? I can see your comments everywhere
100% agree to this guy.. hats off to you sir🫡. I am a Malayali Christian, we respect all the swamis coming here. Secular logic shouldn't be applied to a place of worship.
Also malayali christian, more agnostic now. We need to keep hindu culture alive.
Sir you are doing a great job
Respects to you sir
I am a women and i totally support him .i have seen my father and brothers go there every single years .i my self has gone there till the age of 12 . Its absolutely magical .🙏
So why don't u want to go when u are 25 or 32 or whenever u feel like?? God is God right? Even if he is brahmachari? Or ur afraid he will get tempted by the pretty women ( I am not an atheist! But I'm forced to ask this because I believe God is above everything and these bullshit restrictions make God sound like a Shady Neighbour uncle)
@@tenebrismedicus2956 There are rules in every thing in our life, a man can never go to a women's bathroom because it's a rule and you follow it. Just like that there is a rule for a religious practice, it doesn't matter if you like it or not, or what you think. The only thing that matters is you just follow the rules, why it is so hard for you people to follow rules.
@@soumalyamazumdar3083 the rule should have a logic and clear explanation with proofs
We can’t simply follow if some bullshit (rules) are set in the name of religion or god
What to do We are humans right😂
@@vijaypagalavanwomen is women we don’t want young womens in temple cause all r with bhramachari diksha women is for wishes so if men seen women he can’t control himself
@@vijaypagalavango to other temples which allows u why u want only this one temple
His words are insanely accurate 👏🏻👀
True. Accurately insane!
👏
well said!
This guy is the most intellectual in the entire nation , his Expression of subjects is immaculate he is just amazing
there is a difference between an intellectual and a Sophist
@@lumiarstudios3877 I didn't get it
@@aneesaosman3459 neither did J Sai Deepak😂😂😂
@@LarrysJournal well then, instead of being a troll on the internet and making fun of the guy why don't you explain to him why you said what you said so that he can understand your POV??
@@namitakhurana5225Dont you know debating is Haraam ...😮😮😮
He is the most worthy and deserving lawyer our Supreme Court has!!
What an amazing explanation
Extraordinary👏👏
The statement about religious and secular point is simply superb
He is wrong ..... not the secular logic but WOMEN RIGHT FOR EQUALITY logic being applied for women entry....
He is trying to divert by saying irrelevant but influential lines here....
@@M12m34 you were wrong. They are not denying all women for entry but a particular age group. If you want to fight for women's gender equality rights first go and get the rights for women to enter in mosque.Then come here we will talk
@@M12m34 i am women too but I have the braincells to understand that this is not inequality rather it is respecting the deity of the temple .
@@vamsisaggurthi5528 People's fundamental rights have more value than your religious logic. It is untouchability and it's shameful that we are still continuing this. The court understood that; that's why the court's verdict allowed women's entry into Sabarimala. According to your religious logic, you would still be able to justify untouchability, but nowadays nobody cares about what the religious logic behind untouchability is. That's how civilization evolves. The same will happen to Sabarimala as well.
@@vimalmanikandan4716 first understand the meaning of untouchability. They are not denying any particular caste or race from entering into temple. It's just particular age group. If these women want to visit sabarimala they can do it before they attain pubarty and after their menopage. No one will restrict them. Its you people who doesn't have any knowledge about untouchability,discrimination,gender bias pouring all the dirt into peoples mind. If you have that much concern about womens right all the women are not allowed into worship places in a specific religion. Go fight for them and come here after that.
Sometimes people get so educated and intellect that they forget a simple common sense.
Out of thousands of hindu temples one can go, they will choose some special temple to cry discrimimation 😂😂😂
what lack of common sense you see here einstein..?? care to enlighten us with ur wisdm.?
@@georgecarlinn6288hurch stairs should be paint like Hgbtq and Instead of Jeßus Christ lets say Jay Shree jeßus and Instead of Christmas lets make it Christmas jayanti
@@soulsnatcher4837 good 👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼😊😊
There's a whole ton of educated people in this thread. Albeit hired for cheap by the IT Cell.
Fantastic Sai!
Absolutely amazing
Well said!
Totally understandable! As a woman I'll stay away from a temple made for a brahmachari deity! Why, there are plenty other temples in our country. If I want to worship, do pujas and all, I'll go there. Why go somewhere where there's restrictions? I don't support this hypocrite secularism!
that's what any religious women's ideology would be....all those who women who supported that shameful act either weren't religious or were the ones who knew very less about shabarimala
I don't understand, even there r women who sphincter,if brahmachari deity is special and celebrated,we have Kanyakumari, who is sphincter, deity,where all of can visit,we men r allowed there, why her bramachariya isn't celebrated and why the ritual r performed by men😢,Ur logic has no validation.
@@ThamizhiAaseevagar I don't know why you have to worship in a place where there is a rule like that. A true devotee can worship his/her deity in their home as well. In our country there is no scarcity of temples. If you want to do Puja, go anywhere. God is always residing in your heart either way. Do Puja, mentally, at home or in temples, your prayers will all go to one place. Those who question this are only looking for creating more chaos.
Totally agree .
Out Hindu Temple have rules and we follow them .
It does not matter to us if anyone agrees to it or not .
It is our business.
No secularism applies to our Temples. Period.
Meaningful point by Sai
Very very well said
I dont think anybody put it as simple as this !
Then why do you keep pictures of Brahmachari Hanuman & Ayyappa in your Homes where Women like your Mom, Wife, Sisters & Daughters live??😂
@@imran4006 no one has ayyapa in house because he is naistika bramhachari where as Hanuman can be seen in houses bcz he is bramhachari(not naistika).naistika bramcharyam is done with complete celibacy and away from society
@@akhilkrishna5150 - Are you sure?? I have seen pictures of Ayyappa in Malayali homes
@@imran4006 that is subramanya Swami different from ayyapa but then again some people take liberties and no one questions strictly because it's not a regulated religion.
@@akhilkrishna5150 - Seems like you have never been to a Malayali's house. Every malayali hindu keeps pictures or statue of Ayyappa at his Home.
Super.... Jai sai dheepak .. 🙏🙏🙏 Hindu Religion is Truthful always in it's ways ❤❤
How well does he articulates his thoughts into words...mere to dimag me bhi sentence nahi banenge Jo main kehna chahti hun... he's a true gem...hats off to Sai Deepak Sir
He's a practising advocate which really helps in fast paced thinking and argument creation, I think that's one of the reasons.
🙏🙏🙏 Thankyou Sir
Whoever he is 😂😂😂😂 he is too damn on point
Deepak is superb speaker.
Proud of you sir ..
Very well said❤❤
This man doesn't need medal..he is a gem🥰
No he doesn't,,,,There was a time when lower caste men and women was
Banned from sabarimala at that time then times changed and ban for men was lifted. Then there was a time men and women both went to sabarimala,,,, then with the temple act women of particular age was banned before that everybody was going,,,,, so this is not the will of god this is just the will of man. Just descrimination upon women
@@SadanBabuscorpionking that's ok bro, but it's not discrimination against women, there will be some reasons were women not allowed we should know the roots,why and what..
@@kingashok9 ok bro may i ask about your defenition of descrimination
I know u are educated and have brains,,,,, i respect that,,,,,use your imagination bro,,,,, just imagine you are an ayyappa bhakthan and u are banned from entering sabarimala bcz u are from lower caste,,,, wont u feel descriminated
@@SadanBabuscorpionking bro I'm not much aware of the issue, but women were not allowed from years only this info I know, hope you can discuss with the people who have much knowledge on this. Thank you and take care bro
I remember I was present at place of debate in Delhi. His reply was amazing and he made everyone silent with his logical answers
❤👏
EXCELLENT,
I am in love with this guy. Truly, he speaks facts that are so basic and simple yet these facts never strike my mind until he introduces.
There was a time when lower caste men and women was
Banned from sabarimala at that time then times changed and ban for men was lifted. Then there was a time men and women both went to sabarimala,,,, then with the temple act women of particular age was banned before that everybody was going,,,,, so this is not the will of god this is just the will of man.if nothin happened to ayyappa before nothing will happen if women go,,,, god won't mind to see his daughter visiting him
Lord Ayappan will bless you......and your family sir...my salute to u...
Beautiful explanation sir.. fire
I agree 💯 makes so much sense!
Deepak sir, meeru always logic and sensible person
Simple logic. You go to temple so that you can aquire blessings and add to good deeds. Going to a temple when prohibited will have opposite effects. If you believe in the God, you don't defy the rituals.
tippu killed 60000 hindus in northern kerala and converted 10000 temples to mosques, and simply destroyed many temples and looted , make india hindu country in 2024 🕉️
Who is a bigger Brahmachari than Lord Hanuman?
@work204 So what. If faith says, it is sin to go to temple with certain condition, anyone who is faithful does not go. Only people who go there is to insult such faith goes to Temple. I don't go to masques to insult Islam. But their agents want the right to Insult Hindu faith.
@@work204 who is more dump than you?
Acquiring blessing maybe ...but good deeds I dont agree.
What a excellent answer
Well said sir
This man is a true gem❤️
He spent close to 35 years of his life perfecting dumb!
As a malayali I am proud and touched by your words of wisdom
Hope more people understand the ideals of sanatani dharma
Bro kerela is fucked i pray for your people. Gods own country got destroyed by communist
There was a time when lower caste men and women was
Banned from sabarimala at that time then times changed and ban for men was lifted. Then there was a time men and women both went to sabarimala,,,, then with the temple act women of particular age was banned before that everybody was going,,,,, so this is not the will of god this is just the will of man.if nothin happened to ayyappa before nothing will happen if women go,,,, god won't mind to see his daughter visiting him
You malyalis are very mental people you don't protect our religion in kerla half population convert muslim and critianity....
Wonderful reply
Simply superb ❤
Religious place can not be secular place.. right ❤
He is wrong ..... not the secular logic but WOMEN RIGHT FOR EQUALITY logic being applied for women entry....
He is trying to divert by saying irrelevant but influential lines here....
@@M12m34why womens are not allowed to enter the mosque where is the equality logic 🤔
@@M12m34 In Some Temples Men were not allowed will you apply same equality law at such places.All the set of guidelines prescribed as per the Sthala Purana of that particular temple most of the Hindus respects prescribed rules who the hell are you to question our Religious practices.
right for equality is invalid here
this is as per religious text and i got i question
if you are religious and would follow the text and if you arent then you wont want to go in a temple anyways but somepeople just want to interfere into things for fun
some things are women exclusive acc to culture (like some specific vrats) but then its issue of women inferiority? and somethings are men exclusive then again it shows women inferiority
wow
logic dead
@@M12m34 ask this right to equality to muslims....muslims can marry 4 women.. Can a muslim girl can marry 4 Muslim men?? Fight for equality to muslim women...
Man totally spoke flawless
💯 % right
Nothing wrong
above reproach.
accurate.
blameless.
classic.
clean.
correct.
crimeless.
errorless.
🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
❤❤❤
I’m a woman and I’m a 100% with following the rules. Men are allowing to a have a worship place for themselves. I stand with you. I believe in how energy works and I stand with them
Ones sathi was banned by british its said that there was a March at kolkata by thousands of women roaring against british to reinstall sathi,,,,,im sure you will line up for that too
Education and wisdom both are not same,,,,,, few ones have wisdom nowadays.
@@SadanBabuscorpionking Was the practice of sati practiced by all at that time? So how did the word widow originate? There were many widows in those days, how did they survive this practice? Admittedly it was an undesirable practice, but perhaps it was voluntary and some orthodox people tried to enforce it.
@@lalitdeshmukh9649 sathi was banned by William bentick on 1829,,,after that number of widows increased until widow remarriage act by canning on 1856,,,,,sathi was not practised by all i agree,,,, social evil is a social evil not matter the magnitude of people following it,,,,,,
Once lower caste people were totally banned from same sabarimala then it was cancelled and eveybody were going there irrespective of gender,,,,,, but when the temple act came women of particular age were banned,,,,, so this is a ban by human not by god,,, same as sathi which was made by people,,, if sathi is bad this also is bad. Now sathi is bad prohibition of women is good,,,, after some years new generation will mock us for prohibiting women,,,,, so wake up
@@SadanBabuscorpionking seems like you are one of those who this statement in the main video applies to! There are few things which should not be disturbed not because of some social stigma but because of a higher amount of belief in existence and more! If you are still in denial, your loss!
First , ayyapa a brahmachari is contradictory , the temple near tranvancore potrates him as a married man with two wives .
Second , it became fashion to say about secularism even thought there is nothing to do with it in particular matter , one thing indian secularism is every religion accepted not every religion is denied like France secularism so secularism is not anti religion its a pro religion .
Sir you are great
Slipper shot reply to all fake feminists n some non sensible political parties. Hats off👍
But no judges will understand the last sentence, it is above their pay grade
Let them stay ignorant brother... In naraka they'll have to answer Yama... Let them..
Wait so you are saying the deity won't be able to control himself with a women around him ? By religious logic itself , the person is then not a Brahmachari
@@uttaransaha1941 see again you are using your stupid brain
Listen to him again and again
@@uttaransaha1941 he is not like Dallah/mudmud who can't control and fucks their grand daughters. Think before you try to disrespect other religions. Now go back to your home and save your sister from your grandfather
@@uttaransaha1941 no
Its because he doesn't want male female energy to conflict
There is some specific science related to energy behind this
Please do some proper research before commenting
Also only women of certain age group are not allowed
Not all women
Totally agree ❤❤
Bravo
Right man to speak out facts🙏
I am from Kerala were this temple is in. If the brahmachari deity don't want women to enter his temple and worship him why feminist want to enter that temple and worship him anyway? What is the logic in that?
I agree with you Sir 👏👏
Awesome 😊😊
Ayyappa resides in Sabarimala.... Ayyappa is a yogi practicing brahmachary
Yogic concept has two types of energies
The masculine energy and the feminine energy
Ayyappa is in a mediating posture in Sabarimala and he said he is residing there
To avoid conflict of yogic energies feminine and masculine, women in their adulthood are not allowed
Sadhus or yogis be far from the public while they practice Brahmachary.... Just to avoid that conflict of energies.... It has nothing to do with menstruation... Once any women completes her adulthood they are allowed in the temple...
Only women in their adulthood aren't allowed... When they are small or they grow beyond their adulthood they are allowed to the temple...
In all other important ayyapa temples everyone are allowed
Only because ayyappa resides in Sabarimala.... Which means it's like his house where he stays... As he is living deity in Sabarimala, the masculine energy will present in and around the shrine ... That's the reason women aren't allowed
In Attukal Bagavathy temple mens are not allowed
In kanyakumari temple mens are not allowed
Does that mean discrimination? If dmb people don't know anything then don't brk like dgs
The tantra being practiced in Kerala temples are totally different from other states
Why mens are not allowed in Atukalamma temple or kanyakumari temple???
Even there it's the same concept.... Conflict of feminine and masculine yogic energies
As the feminine energy will be present in and around the temple, mens are not to these temples
Understand the culture of the land, simply mixing up with the blind beliefs of the north and judging a temple in south makes no sense
There is hell lot of difference in the tantra kriya and karma kriya performed in the Kerala temples
That's the reason we have temples where women aren't allowed and we also have temples where men are not allowed
you are absolutely right,, that advocate is not true hindu, some other forces r behind him
@@shecan7261 oh, and you are? That advocate explained it to women in a language she understands...
But u cannot call people dumb if they ask questions.. U have explained it now because people are raising questions.. That's the problem with Hinduism, things are coming out now when there is competition from abrahamic cults and when feminists are asking questions.. Such things should be made available to all so that they don't even have to question.
@@creativeaarts4023these feminists don't question to understand and get an answer. They just want to act like cry babies, victims and make a propaganda
This answer is spot on
I agree totally to his words.. our state is secular not religious place..💯
"You will not tolerate religious logic to secular places"
Which means he knows and accepts the discriminatory nature of religious logics.
And as long as there are religious places in India, by the same logic, religious logic should never be tolerated in any public place in India.
Very intelligent person. We need people like him to run this country
Absolutely true.... And one more thing...when women are not allowed to enter into a mosque, no one complains of gender discrimination
Woman can go mosque but they pray separate, man and woman...
@@salvakhanali8739 I really have not seen jama masjid in Delhi or Saudi...but in reality, throughout my life till date, I have not seen any masjid at my surroundings, where women can go inside and prayer....I have many Muslim friends..... I am quite accustomed with their culture having zero level interest in interference therein...and I was never blamed in making thought less biased remark on anybody's religious belief or practice.....and statistically undoubtedly there are plenty number of masjids in india having enough place to accommodate plenty number of muslims both men and women in respect of number of temples in Saudi where the temple can hardly accommodate a priest.... Hindus might have misconceptions about Islam as this is still a foreign religion to them...but I do want to know your citizenship status and duration of your stay in India if you are an indian citizen in any way or other, and would like to ask you that how many of hindus in Saudi you think, can dare questioning their government's initiative in providing places for making enough number of spacious temples accommodating enough number of hindus being minority class in their country? HINDUS ARE EXCESSIVELY TOLERANT TO EVRY OTHER RELIGION AND TOO BRUTALLY SELF CRITIC REGARDING ANY KIND OF DISCRIMINATION.... Sometimes this excessive tolerance AND SELF CRITICISM wipe out their own identity....but it is hindus' family level characteristics where we are brought up being scolded by our parents while in each occasion, for not seeing own faults even when having none and we have learnt gratitude, tolerance, self criticism and are taught to appreciate and acknowledge fellow citizens' co- operation and philanthropism even when a hindu is a minority in any country. Though we are taught not to expect the same in back, but sometimes a humble reminder awakens conscience if it exists any way.
they are allowed actually they got own place inside to pray but not men and women together will pray in mosques
@@salvakhanali8739just because 20% mosque allows women, dosen't mean all mosques allow.
I don't understand how a debate about entry to women in Hindu temples gets compared to Islam and mosques and what not. It's not a competition, ma'am.
Excellent answer 🎉
Hats off
How wonderfully he said everything...!!😱😇👏👏✌️
There was a time when lower caste men and women was
Banned from sabarimala at that time then times changed and ban for men was lifted. Then there was a time men and women both went to sabarimala,,,, then with the temple act women of particular age was banned before that everybody was going,,,,, so this is not the will of god this is just the will of man.just someone tryna descriminate somenone
@@SadanBabuscorpionking y r u copying and pasting the same comment every where ?? whats your s real name buddy ??
@@Indyfuzzman bcz i think im telling the right thing,,,, when u tells the truth u don't have to change it
@@Indyfuzzman i dont hide my identity,,,,, its the same name as it is
@@SadanBabuscorpionkingCan u tell me why Muslim and non muslim women are not allowed in M@sque but Muslim men are Answer me and stop copypasting This s##t just give me source of that first
YOU HIT THE NAIL ON THE HEAD......WELL SAID......