Most of the women being posted there are by incels who are stealing their photos and posting them as a form of catharsis for being unable to sleep with them. An ex mod exposed them. The initial idea was literally to use it to bully women and girls until they uhhhh do that thing that closes the chapter.
I haven't even been rated mods deleted my posts or said i had bad quality photos amd they were literally good photos lmao. They said you used shitty trash photos🙄🙄🙄🙄
Bro I completely agree. When I first saw the woman’s list, I lost my mind. Literally everyone above a 5 there is generally equally attractive and it’s just up to personal preference, I don’t agree with a lottt of the list. I really hate that subreddit. You also said this but I agree with the idea that attractiveness is objective BUT only until a certain point, and then it all just becomes subjective. These people convinced themselves that certain preferences they all have are 1000% objective. It’s so sad. Edit: AND YES THE MODS. What in the world is the point of people rating you if the mods already have the rating and delete anything that doesn’t match their opinion?? Edit 2: The degrading women is also something I’ve noticed. This subreddit makes my blood boil.
Yeah, I think it's better if an A.I. simply rated people so that subjectiveness can't be part of it. Yes, you might disagree with the A.I., but the point is that you're disgreeing with objectiveness, not that your subjectiveness matters to the objective scale. Objectively we all wouldn't drink waste water, but there's probably one weirdo who likes the taste of it. Regardless of him liking it, the amount of people who would like it is so low you may as well call it objective.
it’s pretty bad for guys too. its like if you dont have the most chiseled face you get defaulted to a 4.5, even when there aren’t any noteworthy flaws.
Yeah I remember leaving a youtube comment once where I said I don't really like big buff guys, and I immediately got accused of lying or not knowing what I like a guy to look like.
people who complain about truerateme legit only ever complain about women getting low ratings when the highest rated posters are usually female it just proves that society is just as harsh as men on looks
I'm not even done the video but I just reached 5:52 and wont go any further until Todd personally and formally apologizes for his inaccurate and misleading comments. If Todd's a 4 the scale must be out of 3. I expect a apology video coming soon...
The fact that this subreddit exists at all is insane. Further mkre that if you find someone beautiful who isnt the purredt and current image of beauty, they just say youre wrong and ban you? Models are pretty. Everyday people are pretty. Asymmetric unique looking people are pretty . I wish people would see what we can see. (Crazy that they banned incel terms when its such an incel type board ?)
If so many comments needed to be deleted for giving a rating other than what the mods agree with, doesn't that kind of completely destroy their argument that beauty is objective?
I think I realised that my idea of beauty was a tad unconventional when I was at the beach, there were a bunch of young, fit, shirtless men, and I was busy staring at the big hairy guy eating McDonald's in the back of his ute
i think one of the biggest issues is trying to fit how many billion humans into 10 numbers. The mods for that subreddit essentially decide the rating and like you said it influences how users will initially rate. Thus ruining the integrity of the "research" they present. humans are weird that's why i try to be a huperson.
I mean if you're asking to be rated specifically then you can't really call it objectification. That's kinda dumb. It's like if someone asked you if you think they look good in their dress and try to call "harassment" if you respond.
@@Man-wolf- I can see how there is sexism and even racism to a lesser degree ( a lot of blackpillers have cited "nordic phenotype" as a desirable trait), but classsism? Where on earth did you get that?
There is a ‘science of beauty,’ which is a collection of features and proportions that are most frequently found attractive. But this changes by region and time, and a face full of just these features is often not found attractive. My personal theory on why, is that it doesn’t look real… like an AI image or something. It’s also because our surroundings and experiences influence who we find attractive. I’ve had a ton of negative experiences with people who these people would likely consider highly attractive. So I don’t tend to go for people that most people would find attractive.
I love the amount of effort an length Toddathan went into looking at the sub. He didn't only look at just posts and some comments he went through many posts comments and even looked at peoples profiles it's honestly really cool.
This shit it what I think of when I see people talking about the "importance" of reddit as a platform, the thing that people are going insane trying to defend from change. Reddit is a cesspool, and the parts that aren't only stand to throw the parts that are into sharp relief.
Wow Todd, bold stance going after the mods at a time like this. But in all seriousness I really appreciate the level of thoroughness, care and unbias when delving into these topics.
Also, I feel like 7 is still high? If average is 5, and the range is 4-6, then I’d be thrilled with a 7. But the problem is that famous people would start at an 8.5 on any kind of looks scale.
Great video as always Todd! I'm loving these kind of deeper/philosophical videos you are making. What I love the most is that in a world of everyone thinking they are right and everyone blasting their opinion in your face and saying its fact, its really nice to have someone that is humble, and like you said at the end willing to change your opinion. that's really rare to see nowadays. You strike a perfect balance between stating the facts and sharing some of your thoughts, I think i speak for your entire audience when I say we all really appreciate the amount of time and research it takes to bring us these videos. Keep it up Todd! ur awesome. 10/10 would eat glass
The problem with rating someone is there’s literally at least a hundred valid measures you can use to rate the face of a person, but its impossible to figure out what specific datapoint in each data point is the max “beautiful”. We cannot conprehend the right amount of objective variables, or the best statstical measure for each variable, and with the harm only a few objective metric (search up the measuring one metric quote), its better to say stuffs subjective.
I, personally, am attracted to people with traights, generally not seen as attractive. I like people with acne, I like fucked up teeth, I like weird noses, I LOVE huge forheads (I want to kiss every huge forehead I see, I'm not even joking), I like uneven facial hair, dark circles under the eyes... You get the idea. And that's only the things about faces, I have the very same attitude to bodies. Idk, having strong preferences is a really weird concept to me. I don't understand that, but I don't judge.
bro i don't find a single person on the 10/10 list attractive. like obviously i can acknowledge that they're all very good looking and handsome or whatever but if i was walking down the street i don't think i'd bat an eye. if beauty is so objective what the fucks wrong with me?? 💀
(Just discovered your videos today and am really enjoying them, thanks man hope you’re doing well!!) I hope all the people participating in the rateme and truerateme subreddits free themselves someday. Be free you sweet, sick babies. You deserve so much more from life than to waste it needlessly judging (and hurting) others based on somebody else’s fucked up scaleeeee of beautyyyyyyy !! Get help!!!
I made the mistake of uploading there without researching it, cause it was supposed to be "objective" I got a 3,6 comment, and then I just decided to take it down. Then found out the true nature of it is just to put women down. 👌🏼
Anyway based on my v limited research, i've asked most women i've met. Almost all of em like the lumberjack type. (They like other men and body types too) it's not so much about the face as it is about in a pinch "can he pick me up and swing me around like a baseball bat?" If yes. Then 10/10 A few gay dudes i've asked also find the concept of someone picking them up enjoyable. And we all already know how lesbians feel about strong women 🥰💗 So based on this i think most people just wants to be able to feel smoll and vulnerable sometimes and if a human happens to be able to fulfill that role then that leads to attraction When it comes to men i personally find danny devito and jack black very attractive but that's me.
So I'm sure some Sam O'Nella fans will remember that there was once a device that was made to measure every minute detail of a woman's face in order to give them advice for makeup and stuff like that (I might be misremembering) and this is giving me shades of that Also, imma be real, the men's examples for the scale farily made some sense, though it was really funny seeing Alex Rodriguez and Jeremy Lin as examples for a 5. I'm with you on the women's scale though. To me, all those faces kinda blend in too much and it's hard to discern between which ones look better.
correct opinion haver todd strikes again. absolutely rotted rating scale, facial symmetry etc can only get you so far whole idea of subs like this one is very cringey to me, breeding ground for racism sexism ableism incels you name it. just a place to go for an ego boost for people who already know they’re attractive, probably better subs out there for people who want actual advice teebeeh
Every time I like a Toddy video I become one point more attractive? I’ve liked all of them 👀 no wonder I have such a hot girlfriend now. I’m off the f-ing charts!!!
If beauty is measure then measure genetic compliability. Like i have have had a 10 this is the one moment with people being like meh about and i meh about their's. it's not even like i like blond hair. no. more like ive seen who npc folk idolise for beauty and go meh at some nope at most but some rando on the street =O and we booth have the same drawn to eachother that's beasutiful. you can't stare at a painting and feel shit like minds me of when mom died =( and have the same connection to somone like that of equal and same attraction
i dont think this is insane at all tbh i hate when people will only rate people 7-10 out of fear they forget that 5 is still perfectly fine for a rating even 4 isnt that bad
Most of the women being posted there are by incels who are stealing their photos and posting them as a form of catharsis for being unable to sleep with them. An ex mod exposed them. The initial idea was literally to use it to bully women and girls until they uhhhh do that thing that closes the chapter.
They pathetic
God incels are absolutely horrendous..
Todd has beautiful feline innocent eyes. Easily a 10/10
Underrating this ur first warning
@@phatfrankiehaaaaaaaaaaa
So true
not wrong
*Banned*
This website strikes me as just a ploy for people who think they're unattractive to try and knock hot people down a peg.
I haven't even been rated mods deleted my posts or said i had bad quality photos amd they were literally good photos lmao. They said you used shitty trash photos🙄🙄🙄🙄
Oh and some said i am a 4 and when someone rated me a 9 or 10 they said they overrated me
Bro I completely agree. When I first saw the woman’s list, I lost my mind. Literally everyone above a 5 there is generally equally attractive and it’s just up to personal preference, I don’t agree with a lottt of the list. I really hate that subreddit. You also said this but I agree with the idea that attractiveness is objective BUT only until a certain point, and then it all just becomes subjective. These people convinced themselves that certain preferences they all have are 1000% objective. It’s so sad.
Edit: AND YES THE MODS. What in the world is the point of people rating you if the mods already have the rating and delete anything that doesn’t match their opinion??
Edit 2: The degrading women is also something I’ve noticed. This subreddit makes my blood boil.
Yeah, I think it's better if an A.I. simply rated people so that subjectiveness can't be part of it.
Yes, you might disagree with the A.I., but the point is that you're disgreeing with objectiveness, not that your subjectiveness matters to the objective scale.
Objectively we all wouldn't drink waste water, but there's probably one weirdo who likes the taste of it. Regardless of him liking it, the amount of people who would like it is so low you may as well call it objective.
I know right, I feel like people are unhinged tbh and relish of the fact they can “ humble people “.
I think the only reason they ban “incel” words is to try to not be (correctly) accused of being massive incels
Because man, they’re… evil.
omg i was thinking the same things!!!!
Literally above a 5 would be considered attractive bro
it’s pretty bad for guys too. its like if you dont have the most chiseled face you get defaulted to a 4.5, even when there aren’t any noteworthy flaws.
Yeah I remember leaving a youtube comment once where I said I don't really like big buff guys, and I immediately got accused of lying or not knowing what I like a guy to look like.
@@CainXVIIbig buff guys make me uncomfortable, how on earth could anyone say that’s a lie
Because if women didn’t like buff guys our species woulda been wiped out already n
people who complain about truerateme legit only ever complain about women getting low ratings when the highest rated posters are usually female it just proves that society is just as harsh as men on looks
Chiseled face isn't always attractive
I'm not even done the video but I just reached 5:52 and wont go any further until Todd personally and formally apologizes for his inaccurate and misleading comments. If Todd's a 4 the scale must be out of 3. I expect a apology video coming soon...
Making someone apologize to you for their opinion is
Psycho behavior
Bye
objective beauty does NOT exist. beauty standards do.
fucking BARS
I'm just sitting here thinking: This is simply just... Like... Phrenology?
EXACTLY!!! Gateway drug to eugenics-minded thinking
The fact that this subreddit exists at all is insane. Further mkre that if you find someone beautiful who isnt the purredt and current image of beauty, they just say youre wrong and ban you? Models are pretty. Everyday people are pretty. Asymmetric unique looking people are pretty . I wish people would see what we can see.
(Crazy that they banned incel terms when its such an incel type board ?)
If so many comments needed to be deleted for giving a rating other than what the mods agree with, doesn't that kind of completely destroy their argument that beauty is objective?
I think I realised that my idea of beauty was a tad unconventional when I was at the beach, there were a bunch of young, fit, shirtless men, and I was busy staring at the big hairy guy eating McDonald's in the back of his ute
That's daddy issues girl
i think one of the biggest issues is trying to fit how many billion humans into 10 numbers. The mods for that subreddit essentially decide the rating and like you said it influences how users will initially rate. Thus ruining the integrity of the "research" they present. humans are weird that's why i try to be a huperson.
It’s just arbitrary bullshit based on 1 picture of a person. Also… rating people‘s looks and calling it objective is so fckn‘ gross.
And ofc… sexism.
Not just sexism but racism & classism too
I mean if you're asking to be rated specifically then you can't really call it objectification. That's kinda dumb. It's like if someone asked you if you think they look good in their dress and try to call "harassment" if you respond.
@@polocatfanthe thing is
It’s basically NEVER the person in the image that’s actually posting it. Using the “you asked for it” argument is nullified
@@Man-wolf- I can see how there is sexism and even racism to a lesser degree ( a lot of blackpillers have cited "nordic phenotype" as a desirable trait), but classsism? Where on earth did you get that?
These standards are so warped and ridiculous... its like these nerds cant do math🤣
There is a ‘science of beauty,’ which is a collection of features and proportions that are most frequently found attractive. But this changes by region and time, and a face full of just these features is often not found attractive. My personal theory on why, is that it doesn’t look real… like an AI image or something. It’s also because our surroundings and experiences influence who we find attractive. I’ve had a ton of negative experiences with people who these people would likely consider highly attractive. So I don’t tend to go for people that most people would find attractive.
The subreddit rules seem pretty racist. All the ideal beauty standards were mainly prominent European features.
I love the amount of effort an length Toddathan went into looking at the sub. He didn't only look at just posts and some comments he went through many posts comments and even looked at peoples profiles it's honestly really cool.
Why does this feel like eugenics with extra steps.....or the same steps.... it's just eugenics under a different name isn't it
This shit it what I think of when I see people talking about the "importance" of reddit as a platform, the thing that people are going insane trying to defend from change.
Reddit is a cesspool, and the parts that aren't only stand to throw the parts that are into sharp relief.
I like the concept of "overrating" when you're just applying your own personal, entirely subjective opinion to someone that asked for it
Wow Todd, bold stance going after the mods at a time like this. But in all seriousness I really appreciate the level of thoroughness, care and unbias when delving into these topics.
Also, I feel like 7 is still high? If average is 5, and the range is 4-6, then I’d be thrilled with a 7. But the problem is that famous people would start at an 8.5 on any kind of looks scale.
I bet it would be quite hilarious if all of the mods for the sub had their faces leaked
They put Chris Hemsworth at an 8.5.....Delusional, he's a 100/10, obviously. This ranking is ridiculous
Great video as always Todd! I'm loving these kind of deeper/philosophical videos you are making. What I love the most is that in a world of everyone thinking they are right and everyone blasting their opinion in your face and saying its fact, its really nice to have someone that is humble, and like you said at the end willing to change your opinion. that's really rare to see nowadays. You strike a perfect balance between stating the facts and sharing some of your thoughts, I think i speak for your entire audience when I say we all really appreciate the amount of time and research it takes to bring us these videos. Keep it up Todd! ur awesome. 10/10 would eat glass
I'm appalled that they put taissa farmiga in the same line as lena dunham for "weak eyes" she is ridiculously pretty.
Sounds a little... You know... Germany during world war ii-ish
That's it, that's the vibe. Horrid!
It's modern day phrenology.
The problem with rating someone is there’s literally at least a hundred valid measures you can use to rate the face of a person, but its impossible to figure out what specific datapoint in each data point is the max “beautiful”. We cannot conprehend the right amount of objective variables, or the best statstical measure for each variable, and with the harm only a few objective metric (search up the measuring one metric quote), its better to say stuffs subjective.
its so stupid to have a rating system that leads to the only acceptable ratings being 4-6. what is the fucking point. whats the point.
I, personally, am attracted to people with traights, generally not seen as attractive. I like people with acne, I like fucked up teeth, I like weird noses, I LOVE huge forheads (I want to kiss every huge forehead I see, I'm not even joking), I like uneven facial hair, dark circles under the eyes... You get the idea. And that's only the things about faces, I have the very same attitude to bodies. Idk, having strong preferences is a really weird concept to me. I don't understand that, but I don't judge.
RIP Harry Styles he had a good run 💀🤣
If Todd posts people will get a warning for underrating if they don’t rate him 20/10
They just gave up when they got to the woman
Harry being on there twice is a violation 😭
Also Johnny Depp, Ryu and Yamasho from the Rampage, Reo from Generations and Keito from Fantastics are all 10s in my heart 🥺
This is just Phrenology: again.
They don't rate attractiveness, but facial harmony and symmetry. Nothing else, at least according to me.
i don’t know a single girl that would turn down micheal cera and no offense but he’s not your typical hollywood stud
toddyquest is very handsome 9.5/10
Dang Toddrick, this video was very entertaining and informative. Always appreciate your uploads ❤
Danny DeVito is a very beautiful man. Jeff Goldblum is quite attractive too.
John Eric hexum accidentally killed himself on set with a prop gun. Not a “fun” fact but a fact. He was so close to being hugely famous
bro i don't find a single person on the 10/10 list attractive. like obviously i can acknowledge that they're all very good looking and handsome or whatever but if i was walking down the street i don't think i'd bat an eye. if beauty is so objective what the fucks wrong with me?? 💀
(Just discovered your videos today and am really enjoying them, thanks man hope you’re doing well!!)
I hope all the people participating in the rateme and truerateme subreddits free themselves someday. Be free you sweet, sick babies. You deserve so much more from life than to waste it needlessly judging (and hurting) others based on somebody else’s fucked up scaleeeee of beautyyyyyyy !! Get help!!!
7,5. Looks a bit like that Flash actor. Maybe get a moustache to change that. Love your content.
How do the people who write these comments look themselves in the mirror?
Probably with the fervor that allows them to rate people in this way
Todd do be a 10/10 gawd damnn
I would
Too low. First warning.
This shit is a slippery slope to eugenics 😬
I made the mistake of uploading there without researching it, cause it was supposed to be "objective" I got a 3,6 comment, and then I just decided to take it down.
Then found out the true nature of it is just to put women down. 👌🏼
People are always shocked when I say Brad Pitt is not cute at all 😭 Like, girl, he's not a god, not everyone finds him attractive.
Anyway based on my v limited research, i've asked most women i've met. Almost all of em like the lumberjack type. (They like other men and body types too) it's not so much about the face as it is about in a pinch "can he pick me up and swing me around like a baseball bat?"
If yes. Then 10/10
A few gay dudes i've asked also find the concept of someone picking them up enjoyable. And we all already know how lesbians feel about strong women 🥰💗
So based on this i think most people just wants to be able to feel smoll and vulnerable sometimes and if a human happens to be able to fulfill that role then that leads to attraction
When it comes to men i personally find danny devito and jack black very attractive but that's me.
I've known about this subreddit for a while but then again I'm a degenerate so there's that
Bro how is ana de armas an 8.5😭😭😭
Smh these people need to get a life
So I'm sure some Sam O'Nella fans will remember that there was once a device that was made to measure every minute detail of a woman's face in order to give them advice for makeup and stuff like that (I might be misremembering) and this is giving me shades of that
Also, imma be real, the men's examples for the scale farily made some sense, though it was really funny seeing Alex Rodriguez and Jeremy Lin as examples for a 5. I'm with you on the women's scale though. To me, all those faces kinda blend in too much and it's hard to discern between which ones look better.
14:20 good point dude
I really feel like the 1 out of 15 have some more attractive dudes than the 1 out of 20 000
Toddy really pretending that he isn't a hard 7 by this rating system. Easily more attractive (imo) than most of the 8+ ratings.
correct opinion haver todd strikes again. absolutely rotted rating scale, facial symmetry etc can only get you so far
whole idea of subs like this one is very cringey to me, breeding ground for racism sexism ableism incels you name it. just a place to go for an ego boost for people who already know they’re attractive, probably better subs out there for people who want actual advice teebeeh
Hi Todd. I just wanted to say that I hope you are having a lovely day. 👍
Ryan Reynolds
i rat yoo 10/10 todee. :)
This video was so good!
Every time I like a Toddy video I become one point more attractive? I’ve liked all of them 👀 no wonder I have such a hot girlfriend now. I’m off the f-ing charts!!!
Well anyway I think Todd is attractive 👉👈
Choi Siwon 6.5 smh
Todd made this video cause he didn't get a 10.0 when he posted to the sub. I think you're a 10 Toddy, eyebrows are for suckers anyway
Yo
Goat
ur a top tier 7
If beauty is measure then measure genetic compliability. Like i have have had a 10 this is the one moment with people being like meh about and i meh about their's. it's not even like i like blond hair. no. more like ive seen who npc folk idolise for beauty and go meh at some nope at most but some rando on the street =O and we booth have the same drawn to eachother that's beasutiful. you can't stare at a painting and feel shit like minds me of when mom died =( and have the same connection to somone like that of equal and same attraction
10
i dont think this is insane at all tbh i hate when people will only rate people 7-10 out of fear they forget that 5 is still perfectly fine for a rating even 4 isnt that bad
In what world a 4 on 10 isn't bad???
@@-gnagnaw its not bad but its below average
@-gnagnaw the average is 5. 4 is saying you're slightly below average
Jay z way lower 😂
oh no, not every woman is rated a 10/10, how horrible
You're worryingly slow.
I think if there was a picture of me there I'd be reted -2 lol