Noam Chomsky: Who is the greatest threat to world peace?
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 24 เม.ย. 2023
- Matt Chorley speaks to Noam Chomsky about the war in Ukraine, asks if the left have been too soft on Putin. They discuss Corbyn's election performances, and what hope Noam holds for the future of humanity.
Matt Chorley, Politics Without The Boring Bits, is on Times.Radio weekdays from 10am 📻
📻 Listen to Times Radio - www.thetimes.co.uk/radio
📍 Subscribe to our channel - / @listentotimesradio
🗞 Subscribe to The Times Times.Radio/Subscribe
📲 Get the free Times Radio app www.thetimes.co.uk/radio/how-...
![ใจดำกับฉันก่อน - วงทัพห้า [Official MV]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/I48wa4qurAU/mqdefault.jpg)
Subscribe to Times.Radio 📡 Read The Times Times.Radio/Subscribe 📰
Noam was Noam as always great interview fantastic pushback 🤗
What an intellectual pygmy Matt Chorley is.
@@billythedog-309
So, Noam, given your worries about climate, how do you feel about the *fact* that China (but also India) is adding more coal fired plants every year?
@@SilvanaDil They are also surging ahead with more renewable energy creation than any other country.
@@billythedog-309 The new coal burning plants more than cancel out any benefits from the new solar panels. A murderer helping a little old lady walk across the street doesn't revive the dead body.
Noam Chomsky had the patience of Job to deal with this guy
Most idiots didn’t get this comment
They saw “Job” and didn’t realize you were speaking of a biblical figure
Matt Chorly is living proof of the worst negligence theories about the British media. What's amazing is how Chomsky keeps his cool (mostly) and smiles benignly at the end.
Because he has lived long enough to know that fools are going tstay fools but that some viewers/readers might be able to use the info for their better understanding, which is what's this all about. Change starts with us!
Yes, indeed, my view of the Global South differs from Chomsky's but he remembers facts which few others seem to recall.
I remember U.S.A.'s intervention in El Salvador. I remember Britain's going overboard in Libya. I, however, think that the Global South bears most of the responsibility for why their people's are so *cursed* . It's the bad opportunistic amoral attitude without any regards to any long-term vision. 『過日子, 飯吃飽。』 cultures. 😰
Chomski is a heavy weight sparring with an amateur sleep fighter
Chomsky is too intelligent to get angry at such trivial questions coming from a diminished and corrupted mind. You get angry at those who hurt you - the man simply does not have that capacity. i'd be surprised to see Chomsky get angry, in that light.
Difficult to watch.
Gonna need some time to uncringe…
ex. "I cringed at his stupidity"
I'm 92 years old and it does my heart good to hear Prof. Chomsky get the best of this interviewer with a calm logic that explodes with graceful intelligence.
It is not a calm logic, it is Russophobia and cynicism.
''it does my heart good to hear Prof. Chomsky get the best of this interviewer with a calm logic that explodes with graceful intelligence.''
It's the opposite of what ''Norm Twinklestar'' does with his whiny, shrill voice, yelling ad hominems and irrelevant facts to overwhelm opponents .
@@rocksparadox yeah, but Norm knows the facts probably better than Noam in some subjects!
@@rocksparadox how is a fact irrelevant? What I mean is, what facts has he ever used in a debate that were irrelevant?
how does a 92 y/o get on youtube?
How rude and disrespectful of Matt Chorley dealing with a giant like Chomsky like that.
If anything, Chomsky was given too much deference. His false arguments should have been challenged. Russia's "security concerns" What a joke. Ukraine applied to NATO as far back as 2008 and Putin previously acknowledged their right to do so. In any case Ukraine had no chance of being admitted to NATO in 2022 with part of the country already under occupation.
chomsky has probably dealt with far more potentially-stressful rudeness. it's like watching a squirrel run around, to him. just some lower species behaving in its usual mindless way.
I rather prefer the Gnome Compsky version.
Why would anyone think this kind of man was remotely educated enough to do an interview with Noam Chomsky?
The dunning-Kruger effect. The stupider you are, the more sure you are of yourself and your delusions.
@@CrimsonA1 ah, the condition has a name. Thanks!
@@CrimsonA1 Oy~~Dunning and Kruger must have buried each other in their stupidity! Who won? I doubt it matters. A few contributors here want to get into the act. 🤫🤭😌
😅😅😅 exactly
@@UnityJustice-qw8hdcool.
And what University do you reach at if I may ask?
The conduction of this interview in one sentence:
'When a wise man points to the moon the fool examines the finger.'
Love that expression
I love your post from where did you get this quote
@@user-wy1dv2qk5o Well, like everything "old & Chinese" it usually gets wrongly attributed it to Confucius... :/
But this one goes back to Dàjiàn Huìnéng, (last Chan Buddhist Patriarch, 6th century). He was said to be uneducated, illiterate and full of wisdom.
The actual story:
A fellow Buddhist told Huìnéng she had read the scripture for years and still didn't get its meaning. So he asked her to read it to him and see if he might help explain.
She laughed, "you can't even read, how could you understand?" Huìnéng replied, "Truth has nothing to do with language. Truth is like the moon in the sky, language is like the finger that points to the moon.
A finger can point out where the moon is, but the finger is not the truth. You can see the moon without help of any fingers, can't you?"
Long answer, hope it was worth the read :)
Well said !
nice finger,,,
I remember the east Timor genocide and no one I talk to knows what I am talking about. Thanks for reminding the interviewer about history.
Appalling interview. Matt Chorley the world will change positively when people like you learn how to conduct themselves with respect and intelligence.
Yeah, this guy is such a porplag*nda (this way the comment won't be deleted) tool.
Was hoping for a comment like this after watching this interview. Faith in humanity restored!
Im sure Chomsky is not even angry at him but he stole a bit of Chomsky from EVERYBODY. he had 1 chance to do this interview but wanted to push an agenda
That's only possible if there is any intelligence there. This man is a clown and a propagandist. You simply can't expect him to think with his own head.
It's too late for that now. This is a spiritual war.
Noam Chomsky versus whateveryournameis interviewer, pure class versus pure ignorance, he just spoke to a living legend and learnt nothing. God save us all
Well said!
Noam Chomsky is too smart to have a discussion with such a simpleminded interview. To match them is basically an insult to Noam.
But I would still give this interviewer some credit to let Chomsky speak. Imagine if it was gullible Piers Morgan!
Legendary because hes never been right on anything
21:39 When Chomsky says "Listen to the words, OK?", you know the interviewer is beyond hope.
How can you be expected to keep comments regarding this presenter respectful when his whole demeanor is an insult to any form of intelligence?
Lol. Top marks
Ah, very well said. 👏
You took the words out of my mouth.
Presenter was a Hack and not even a good one.
I just commented. Respect needs to be earned. It's civility that should be mandatory at a first meeting. Not respect.
we have a program like this in Germany where kids interview intellectuals
Jung und Naiv with Tio Jung ?
@@ernstwiltmann6 Kinder-Reporter?! 😁
@@sbackhaus Koenn'se doch nachgoogeln. Wenn'se nix gegen Pronaunce haben.
There's no such thing as an intellectual. The title is bestowed to turn off your critical thinking ability when they talk. Everybody makes mistakes, but you won't question a mistake so readily when "an intellectual" makes a statement. Don't underestimate yourself.
@@fuzzywzhe I think you are underestimating Chomsky. He has taught me critical thinking. I don't agree with everything he says, and Chomsky taught me to question everything. That includes Chomsky and you.
I almost forget what integrity and truth sounds like. Noam Chomsky has never wavered in his truthfulness. This reporter is a one man clown car
In other words, Chomsky's answers are so much stronger, rebuking the interviewer's challenging tone. They both were at the top of their game.
@@GeneralSamov top of their game? What kind of reporter doesn't know Professor Chomsky's occupation, the most important ever university professor of linguistics and the single most cited academic of humanity?
@@monsieurhercule
A lot, Chomsky's is like from the Cretaceous.
Chomsky is far from prefect, if you want someone to call out the US over its crimes he's excellent, but try and get him to do the same to a US rival like Russia, China etc and he descends into mealy mouthed apologist territory. The guy is so fixated on US imperialism he completely ignores anything else.
@@GeneralSamovthe reporter "at the top of his game" ???😂 I would hate to see him conduct an interview on one of his off days! It would be a total car crash! Thanks for the comedic appraisal of his skill as an interviewer!
Matt Chorley came across incredibly badly here. I gave this a thumbs up for Noam's ability to keep calm and respectful.
I agree
What was bad about him?
*respectfully repeating Putin's fascist lies.
The person being interviewed is proof that not everyone deemed to be smart and impartial IS! He turns everything into a 'west bashing' scenario. China is the biggest contributor to climate change, Russia has engineered not just the Ukraine war but also the HAMAS atrocities and those in YEMEN. This man is a disgrace to the west!
Everything? @@macflod
😢Matt Chorley showed his complete inability to interview a major world renowned intellectual, Chorley was the wrong choice for this interview, he tried to put words into the mouth of Chomsky, it was embarrassing and at times disrespectful.
I'd argue the exact opposite. The interviewer's belligerence really triggered Chomsky to spill all the beans, which resulted in a glorious exchange with no punches pulled.
@@GeneralSamov I see your point, but I'd argue it's only valid to a very small extent. The interviewer's interruptions became repetitive very quickly, and Mr Chomsky could have told us more if he hadn't been forced to correct the same misinterpretations over and over again.
@@GeneralSamov"glorious exchange?" Did we just watch the same interview? Doesn't it take more than one person for there to be an exchange, glorious or otherwise? I suppose you think the interviewer was an agent provocateur? All I saw was an individual of great intellect, wonderfully articulating the truth and another replete with abject ignorance and discourteously trying his level best to spew the intellectually dishonest, disingenuous drivel, that has become the mainstay of Western mainstream media. No one with a couple of brain cells believes in the propaganda anymore.
@@GeneralSamov😂
Invites a wise man for an interview. Tells him he's wrong. Comedy gold.
He is wrong. The war in Ukraine is a thousand times worse than the invasion of Iraq.
Truly shocked that Times Radio would put this interview out. They manage to get a slot with an intellectual giant but put Matt Chorley in front of him. I was concerned for Naom's health, his blood pressure could easily have rocketed given the frustration he must have felt. God bless him.
he used to talk with Israeli journalist so he got interviewed by way worst propaganda journalist
The interviewer certainly made a fool of himself! Loved it! The brilliance of the great Chomsky!
The interviewer is a buffoon!
totally agree..
I don't think Chomsky would like that kind of comments even if his interviewer's behavior was questionable. Malgorzata Gabrys
Why is the interviewer allowed to talk? Almost unable to understand what he says. Mumbling.
not really. a fool always thinks he's right. he probably thinks he's cleverer than chomsky, now. seriously. you may think that's ludicrous but it's probably the case, and it is quite common in life
whoever you are, if you are intelligent and honest and work hard you already know this
I'm from iraq, since I'm interested in hearing what other people and politician saying about my destroy country ,no one likes telling the truth , but this is different,he is courageous man to tell real things, which no one wants to say
I feel sick over the war in Iraq and the horrible destruction that resulted. We were supposed to believe that Saddam was a terrorist when in point of fact he was a secular leader opposed to Al Qaida, and he had fully complied with the weapons inspections and quarantined his chemical stockpiles. There was no justification to go into Iraq and remove the leaders of government. It was a horrible act and the war planners had no plan for keeping order in the aftermath. It ended up strengthening Iran's hand in the region and made possible for ISIS to fill the power void. I think of Mosul, Felluja, the fires and looting in Bagdad. None of it had to happen. It was all due to the Bush administration wanting to remove Russia's influence in the Middle East by forcing a regime change. All those Iraqi's who were killed and wounded, all the property destroyed because a few men in Bush administration wanted to tie some loose ends of the Cold War. Bush wanted to tie Saddam and Iraq to 9/11, but there was no connection. Nevertheless many average Americans falsely assumed there was a connection and it was the reason for the war. This is the truth few Americans want to face and even fewer want to talk about.
My neighbor is Iraqi war veteran.
When I ask him
What was the main purposes of Iraqi invasion.
He answers :
"I don't know."
Baghdad, the cradle of civilisation
Irawlq lol
Os Estados Unidos invadiram o Iraque, Síria, Líbia, Afeganistão e podem invadir o Iran em obediência ao lobby de Israel. Fazem isso com a finalidade de destruir esses países e não para implantar a democracia e a liberdade, deixando atras centenas de milhares de mortos.
I absolutely love mr Chomsky. His writing it's a lighthouse for human thought.The greatest teacher of the last century, one of the best ever.
This kind of interview is what happens when mayonnaise becomes sentient. Chomsky has a lot of patience to be able to sit through it.
I think that it is so sad to have so many reporters and presenters like this one, who only care to sustain their beliefs and not listen to real and documented facts.
And what’s the fact here? Russia invaded Ukraine! It’s a f fact!
Thank you Mr Chomsky don’t let him twist your words I pray for your health every day you are our conscience
Glad you wrote this, I thought it was just me. He was cherry picking Chomsky’s replies to try and get some sort of “you are a hypocrite” gotcha.
Exactly, well stated
not every day but I pray for Chomsky's health quite regularly.
Thank you Mr. Chomsky! ❤God bless you!
As consciousness alone exists let us live heart first.❤❤❤
Looking at wikipedia on Jeremy Corbyn labour success, Chomsky is correct.
"Although Labour started the campaign as far as 20 points behind, it defied expectations by gaining 40% of the vote, its greatest share since 2001. It was the first time Labour had made a net gain of seats since 1997, and the party's 9.6% increase in vote share was its largest in a single general election since 1945."
I did the same.
What a gem Chomsky is: rational, fact based, with a steady moral compass. The interviewer was desperate to gas light him but Chomsky was having none of it.
Imagine having the opportunity to speak with one of the worlds greatest intellects of the 20th/21st century but you’re this guy 🤡
Indeed
Appalling
34:22
Well, it is time to speak the way to this old communist fool deserves, he was saying a lot of nonsense, good job of the interviewer, appreciate that.
What a glorious comment😂
The interviewer clearly isn't the sharpest instrument in the drawer. One has to salute Chomsky for his patience.
kudos to Noam for his incredible patience with this thick gentleman
Chomsky stays calm and calls the fact despite being rudely interrupted.
He’s an imbecile.
The person taking the interview is extremely disrespectful. Lack basic etiquette of even having a decent conversation. Completely ignorant and arrogant . Love Mr Chomsky knowledge, cool , patience and charisma. May you always stay blessed and happy . Ameen
Stiff upper lip?
Stiff upper lip?
that's classic right-wing broadcasting
Good comment.
"Could you tell us what your key areas of research and teaching at MIT over the decades have been?"....that would have been way better than "What is your job?". Best approach would be to have an interviewer able to introduce the guest.
... I can not recall the last time I've listened to a man who was asking questions and done utmost not to hear the answers...
We accepted the fact that Fiat Dollars would not last in 1970.
They tried anyway.
The illusion of Capitalism appears to have died along with the US GDP?
That’s a communist for you! 🙃
Try being a Scot, we get this nonsense every day,from the unionist clowns
Actually felt right from the start the interviewer was out of his depth
Only a fool tries to outthink or catch out Chomsky who has been making idiots of sly questioners for 50 years. If you ain't got an IQ of at least 150, which the interviewer clearly hasn't, don't take him on.
Thank you Noam. You are one of the heroes in our world. Truth will win. We know it.🌼🌺🌸
Noam is a gift to the world.
Can Times Radio not afford a half-decent interviewer? He seemed stuck in an ideological rut, and there were times when he was unable to grasp the answer he'd been given.
Really embarrassing.
I thought he did a great job of trying to get straight answers out of a bumbling old man
@@martinbaumgardner4432Wow, really obtuse, insensitive and selfish. You will never be this clear at any age, obviously.
@@martinbaumgardner4432. If that’s what you think then you didn’t listen properly. Watch it again, this time sober.
Those times when he didn't seem to graps the answers felt pretty much like extending from the start to the finish of the interview.
If someone treats their neighbours badly, they shouldn't be surprised if those neighbours seek friends elsewhere.
If someone treats members of their neighbours living within their country badly _first,_ they shouldn't be surprised if those neighbours then decide to fck them up even worse.
@@livingtribunal4110 Thats dumb. Russians killed and expatriated Ukrainians for centuries. Brought own settlers instead to those lands.
@@livingtribunal4110 And when there is dispute about who (and when) treated certain people badly, a good approach is to ask those ill-treated people who it was that treated them badly. If there are too many of them, one may either conduct serious, audited scientific polling, or ask their genuinely democratically elected representatives.
@@davidwright5094 Or you can forget all that BS and fck-up those who started the mistreating in the fist place.
Bit like when those people started invading other sovreign countries back in ther day, looking for the ´obvious´ evidence and use of ´Weapons of Mass Destruction´.
But wait....´it´s okay when we do it!!´
_AMIRITE??????_
@@livingtribunal4110 yeah thats justification for murdering civilians.. Z garbage
Bravo to Chomsky to never giving up explaining facts that our actions matter. We need to start thinking and stop being picklocks as this interviewer.
It is amazing how Chomsky masterfully keeps his cool in the face of a really pushy and biased interviewer -- I think the interviewer misunderstood his role and ended interviewing himself trying to impose his answers over chomsky, but the great chomsky manages it so well!
Noam: “The invasion of Ukraine is bad”
Interviewer: “Why are you saying the invasion of Ukraine is good?”
Haha, the cocky “journalist” gets slapped in the face with a wet trout by a 95 year old LOL
Theoreticall, Noam, you are not justifying russian aggression by claiming that US has made the same atrocities many times. Theoretically not, but people understand your words as "if US can make atrocities, russia has the same right to do it" OR Global south, BRICS has the same right to be on the top. But practically it means BRICS, global south wants the same chance to try out imperialisms, colonialisms we in west have overcome decades ago. Why not? I agree. But do you now how narrow minded you sound? Noam, you read only literature you are interested in, and you accomodate your talks according to discourse you are in, so your marxist righteousness (which are far shallower than old hebrew and jesus's righteousness) goals are filtering reality according to what you prefer to point out. You are not historian and you are even not interested in real facts about Ukraine, although it was homeland of your father. You dont want to see that Putin is total manipulative psychopath, you dont even slightly want to know that ukainians are not fascists and they did not do genocide to russian minority and you again make up all your examples to lead all these poor people without knowledge astray claiming that mexico would be demolished if it hosts chinese arms. You are not interested in real world and in the whole context of situation that russia wants ukraine to be part of russian imperium again since they have departed in 1991, it is in vain to explain to you that YES, US should be separately condemned for all their wars, but this time US are helping pure victim of Ukraine, because Russia have been infiltrating Ukriane for decades to annex Ua like they are doing to Blr (according to documents to become Russia in 2030) when they recognized they were not able to do it economically and politically they did it aggressivelly. So it is simple, what is more important to you, Noam, small UA being defended by NATO from Russian threat or big Russia being threatened by NATO. Which country interest is more important to you small or big one's interest? You have decided, like Mearsheimer. You go for Russia. I understand. US and west have done so many bad things, Irak, Vietnam etc. But do you know how many more bad things has Russia done in last 100 years? Not interested. You are filtering reality acording to your left orientations. You are filtering example with mexico. If china arms mexico US would destroy mexico. Yes, but reality is different, if US would infiltrate Mexico in order to annex it in future (300 years of rus-ua evidences) then Mexico would revolt and China starts to arm Mexico right? Then US makes TOTAL invasion into Mexico. Now whole world would be arming Mexico you cr*zy old man. Why dont you and Mearsheimer understand that you have poisoned almost as many people with russian propagand as vladimir putin. You are in your id*otic realiy. Nobody is excusing US, collect yourself and rather you criticise US separatedly from Ukraine, because when you talk about US guilt in connections with russo-ua war, whole world starts to feel growing emotional support for russian rights to confront bad exploitative west - which is exactly what intelligent Putin had recognized in peoples' eyes in order to use it for propaganda, invading Ukraine behind blind mobs. Excusing, excusing, why you dont look practicaly what impact you do to peoples' hearts, you single-minded man! West is bad, true, but do anyone of you readers know that you even dont have a chance to know how many atrocities Russia has done inside its coutry because Russia has closed down all human feelings for 140 million peope, therefore you dont have any single info of all terrible things happening there and you would be now preaching me!!! Noam, be ashamed of yourself, you even dont know russian language and of course you dont know ukrainian, you are not interested. I know both and i am not ukrainian, i am not russian, i love russian culture, russian friendship, russian soul, russian art thousands times more than you, but i also support kremlin thousand times less than you. Dont tell me, I know very well that you dont support Kremlin, but you make people support Kremlin, oh academic people, you are done, acadamy is done. Humanities are done. Every academic of humanity is just seeing what he prefers to see. Have you ever asked why no einstein and no jesus havnt been born for at least 100 years, although soooo many educated people! NOT NOAM, we need NEW NOAH (ark)
Exactly. Interviewers should pay attention to those they interview.
EXACTLY. Thank you so, so, so much for being a normal person. I'm ACTUALLY thankful to you for being normal, and not like the rest.
"So what you saying is..."
Chomsky can still out argue anyone even at his advance age. Its a beautiful thing! He has an ace in the hole. He simply states facts.
Facts don't need emotion nor sentiments. facts simply stand alone. Noam is brilliant with it.
A man who has been doing the "facts over feelings" things for over 60years, while tossers like ben shapiro cower in his shadow.
He is a psychopath.
@kunik61 That's an interesting statement! Not one, I was expecting. Why do you think that? It might be helpful if you explained your position rather then just giving it.
@@jasonkinzie8835 Because he wishes my homeland (Ukraine) TO DISAPPEAR.
The western party line - 'You are with us or you are with our enemies'.
I feel sorry for this old man
He is 100% correct. Unfortunately it is a lonely life speaking the truth. Tribalism is totally rife in this world.
Interviewer is definitely on something, stay off the devils lettuce pal. Noam Chomsky I salute you sir thank you for all that you do 🫡
What an amazing gentleman, his patience with the young interviewer who really is a prat.
Yeah I bet it was a hit with the teenage girls on epstys payroll
Major prattttt
You’re generous to call him young
It's good to hear an attitude like this rather than reverence and awe from interviewers?
Yeah, the interviewer is an embarrassment. a Tory Murdoch propagandist. Anyone with even a basic understanding of political history, global economics and geopolitics, knows what really caused this US proxy war in Ukraine.
Love you Chomsky. I don’t know how you have patience for interviewers who don’t want to listen
Brain wins over populism. Just wonderful to see. Thank you for sharing your wonderful objectivity, Mr Chomsky 🙂
Noam you are one of the most selfless, tireless champions of liberty, Free Speech and Democracy the world will ever know. I thank you for changing my life and in 10 years ive never waited more than a day for a reply to any email. and you get 1000.s a day i know. cheers mate, your insights a strong as ever. cheers mate.
You are a beautiful man and human being, Noam Chomsky.
There is a huge difference between being an intellectual and a person with the podcast giving opinions
Yeah, Chomsky is very argumentative and the other biased guy just want to hear "Rusha bad". Phucking planet.
Jesus you idiots. You have know idea how his background on linguistics and cognition. As the presenter said he is more quoted than the bible. Thats for a good reason. He is the most quoted person in science. You just comment on the internet.
The good thing about the West is that a guy like Noam can exist. Noam would have been jailed a long time ago if he lived in Russia.
@@danielm5161 would you say that the West has a younger Chomsky for the future? Who might that be?
@@sophitsa79 Maybe anybody? Maybe one of his students? What is this question. There are millions of people studying in universities that have free knowledge, not dictatorship restricted knowledge. All it takes is studying hard like he has did. He doesn't rely on media, he studies facts
It's always wonderful to hear Professor Chomsky's voice of deep sanity and reason and intelligence, and I'm amazed at the patience he shows with this oafish and surprisingly rather disrespectful man.
Typical insecure arrogant British male. I would know I live there.
Noam Chomsky is a true scholar!! His insights and intellect are stellar ! He has acute knowledge that I constantly learn from him ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
A discussion between a genius and a very simple mind.
Still time for the old man to see reality, guess trees don't count, when your selling books
Genius😂😂😅. Yeah, sure.
Interviewer definitely not a genius…
The interviewer is right Chomsky is a dogmatist defending fascist imperialism.
This English guy is a lunatic, purposely trying to provoke his host. Typical low morale "journalism"
watching this really proves that "having little knowledge is dangerous"
Legend, stay well Prof Chomsky ❤
Matt Chorley seems like those kids who just cracked a window with a ball and keeps saying "no" even confronted with his image recorded on CFTV showing that he did.
We have an interviewer here in Belgium like this one too. In his mind it’s completely clear that what he says is the truth. Insinuating questions, repeating his opinion, twisting words, ridiculing his guest, … and as it seems, people love it. Makes my stomach hurt.
The USS Fallujah! I will never forget that horrific war crime. Was mass destruction, was collective punishment for crimes the people did not commit and has left a legacy of trauma and countless babies with birth defects due to the uranium tipped shells which bombarded the inhabitants of Fallujah. Thank you Noam for your lifes work.
As a West Coast American, I will bet you most Americans think Fallujah is a fancy name for caviar. 🤭🤫
As soon as I realised this was a BBC facilitated interview with this interviewer, my heart sank. The buffon receives pearls of wisdom and insight on global strategies and asks what the weather is doing...
Matt Chorley's ability to debate without bias with Noam Chomsky can clearly be seen in this interview.
Hurray! for people like Chomsky! Listening to people like him is essential to escape bad journalism that doesn't give you facts but just serve propaganda.
Absolutely ! Paparazzi follow their pay roll agendas, scientists follow their brains.
He is my litmus test for all mainstream media coverage. If I get my response in sync with Israel, for eg. for anything they choose to do to the arabs in Gaza, I love getting a second opinion to round out my positive response, and it always changes and comes down to a more level playing field, where I can see abuse side by side with pride and love for Israel. I can see crimes, alongside patriotism and excellence, so that no one belief system can choke out the truth, which is not so easy to know. This way it is possible to recall history, how we got here and who the players are, and what they did in self interest to set up the middle east for their own greed, even using Israel to expand their imperialism and colonialism. That's us, Canada included.
If an educated, calm man, speaking truth is the greatest threat to peace... then God help us.
I had to quit after 20 min. I don't know how chomskey was able to take it that long
Me neither
The greater the star, the more humble they are.
The brighter the light, the darker the shadow.
For a person with as much accomplishment and influence as Noam Chomsky, he's remarkably humble.
It’s fake humble. He had acolytes who were very aggressive in support of his linguistic ideas.
@@StillAliveAndKicking_ ... Assuming that you can prove your views on his Linguistics accomplishments - which I sincerely doubt, what has it got to do with the authenticity of Chomsky's humility ?
@@bobbart4198 Listen to him. He has no interest in listening to other viewpoints, he routinely trashes the West and completely ignores crimes committed elsewhere.
@@bobbart4198 I have made no comment on his linguistic accomplishments
@@StillAliveAndKicking_ ... Your comment in full : " It’s fake humble. He had acolytes who were very aggressive in support of his linguistic ideas. " ... And how do YOU know his Humility is " Fake " - explain ...
Why does Matt have to yell at Noam and get all aggressive?
In all due respect, you, the interviewer, are other than smart! You are putting words into Chomsky's mouth.
He is almost attacking one of greatest minds of our time because he doesn’t like the answers to his questions?
I know I’m offended !
Don't blame the interviewer, he is a victim who are brainwashed by the western propaganda and has no idea what is fact and his logic thinking skill=0. Sorry for him.
Actually, the interviewer doesn't understand the answers to his questions. To Chomsky, it isn't about choosing sides when it comes to war crimes. They are all crimes. The excuses of the U.S. for their war crimes doesn't make them any less so.
The patience of this prof is unbelievable.
I admire Chomsky for his wisdom and especially for his holy patience with the impertinent journalist.
Noam is a beautiful man, a hero and an inspiration for so many of us,, The interviewer seems to be born yesterday, its wonderful to see how kind Noam is and he is sticking to the facts. Thank you Noam Chomsky for the lesson.
Wow. Interviewer really struggling to get reality. He needs comfort of knowing if one side is good other must be bad. Someone needs to explain to him that the world is full of nuance and needs to be viewed as so. If only he could hear!
I am surprised how well Chomsky held his nerves. What world are they living in? Do they take their screens for reality? They seem to.
Professor Chomsky showed A LOT of patience w/this interviewer who doesn’t seem to understand what he’s saying…He is a remarkable human.
On a side note. Prof Chomsky inspired me to take a class on Linguistics…:) this will help understand AI and others an increase my ability to communicate effectively. I’m not sponsoring , but Coursera is a great app wherein you can take college classes for free, if you don’t need the college credit!
Which course did you take?
He repeats russian propaganda at nauseam
@@yanenn2151 hmm
@@yanenn2151 Pretty much. He's a great mind, but in the past few years we've started to see some of his dumber opinions come out.
The truth is there are few actors involved that are innocent of war crimes or crimes against humanity. Our way of life is built on the exploitation of others and always has been 💰💰💰
How wise Mr. Chomsky is.
This was 30 minutes of this guy trying to put words in Noams mouth.
‘maybe the guy getting the garbage has better ideas but not the privilege ‘
humble genius
Or just blatantly disingenuous.
Only someone that works at the lowest level but feels they dont need to put the effort in to progress agrees with that statement
@@JoolzThePirate what is the lowest level? How do you measure that?
@@JoolzThePirate more binmen less bankers!
@@azarbafi69 garbageman
The fairest and honest, I wish we could clone you Nomsky Chosky! I wish you many more years to come and influence many more people to contribute a truth and different ways of life to live in this world!
Reminds me of the "robust" discussion in which my conversation partner said, "FLCCC recommends ivermectin: I give it to my goats!" This is a how to think topic. Thanks to Noam, we can learn how to think: contextually, causes and conditions, background, class struggle. $50 trillion upwardly moved--from the "non supervisory workers, the working and the middle class to the 1%. Technofeudallism now, as Varoufakis can describe.
Interviewer got owned by a 94 year old. Lol. Noam is a legend.
I’m not sure why but I really get the feeling this Matt Chorley fellow isn’t actually all that interested in what Chomsky has to say 🤔
Is that its name.?!
I had no idea. Trevor ‘Trev’ Millwall flashed through me crust as I read your post, cor blimey gov. Maybe the wee guy was distracted by Chas and Dave & chimney sweeps.
_/nods/_ It has happened Skylight.
I get the feeling what Chomski is saying anything western is bad and anything russian is not bad and that is what "that fellow" was trying to get at but Chomski as slippery as an eel.
Nope. He is acting arrogant and comes across like an ars*ole next to the intellect of Chomsky.
@@rwo5402 Chomsky is reacting to the ridiculous framing Chorley is presenting. Chorley is saying, basically 'we know Russians are bad... Lefties say Americans are bad... which is it?' Specious framing which Chomskey counters by saying - whether the Iraq war, Lebanon invasion, the invasion of Ukraine etc. - these are all atrocities. Now, if you think that is 'slippery' I don't know what you would consider not slippery!
Times Radio obviously needs to kick at the Left, whereas the reality is that Chomsky is not speaking on 'behalf of'. His position is to point out the actual consequences of governmental military intervention - in the name of whatever - on the people who suffer from it.
If you want to reach an accurate understanding of the socio-political causes and consequences of these modern military atrocities, perhaps you should stop looking at whose side you think are the good guys, and consider instead why these things happened and what the practical consequences were for the people on the sharp end of them.
@@stueyapstuey4235 ...and Chomsky answers by doing victim accounting and somehow starts with the Vietnam war. If he does victim accounting why not start with the 60 million in WW2, the countless millions killed by the Soviet Union and the Chinese Communist Party or the bombing Chechnia back to the stone age or the indiscriminate war against civilians by Russia in Syria or the invasian of Afghanistan.
And even if if the question was framed in this way considering that many people see the unprovoced attack on Ukraine this way Chomsky didn't answer that question in a way that could satisfy your average listener, instead fleeing into whining about western hypocrisy and listing all the bad things the west has done implying that the west has no place in complaining about Russias actions. And that is with all due respect utter BS.
Now to the question as to why Ukraine happened, it happened because Putin is a facist autocrat under pressure domestically. Sorry too much credit, Putin is the godfather of a mafia state. Western Europe looked (and specifically Germany) the other way for the last 20 years and since 2014 clearly tried appeasement hoping that after crimea Putin had what he wanted. However appeasement always emboldens an autocrat as we have witnessed time and time again in history.
Also saying that Sweden and Finland joined just so they can sell more weapons completely discredits Chomski as an impartial neutral observer and commentator. When I heard that I realised that Chomski lives in his own bubble.
So since the end of WW2 there hasn't been a conflict where the distinction between the good guy and the bad has been so obvious.
..unfortunately, the closed captions keep obscuring Chomsky's remarks with substitutions which make no sense.. for example, substituting "Liberty movement" for "Labor movement," "harsh recording" for "harsh austerity," "easy prey" for "easy prairie," "Christmas " is substituted for "precipice," etc.. there are so many mistakes!! Please fix the subtitles!
Did anyone notice the Freudian Slip at 5:28, wherein he said "fossil fool"? Perhaps it was intentional, but in any case, may you live forever, Noam Chomsky. We would indeed be doomed without you.
Thank you professor. Your body of work will be a gift for generations to come if we become educable.
May your remaining days be surrounded by love and grace .
As a Swede I can assure you this man knows nothing about Finland or Swedens history regarding NATO and these countries reasons for previously not joining and now seeing no other way out than joining.
Also, why don't he try looking a Ukrainian in the eyes and tell them they shouldnt be in NATO because that would provoke Russia?!? Would be interesting to let Chimsky take a wild guess how many Ukrainians he thinks would like to be in NATO right now?
Well, you don't speak "as a Swede" but as yourself.
I am an admirer of Chomsky, but on this one, I am with you. Countries join NATO because reality shows that ex-soviet and neighbor countries are not safe with a rogue state like Russia.
Even if 100% wanted to to join 100% of Ukrainians would be dead wrong. That does NOT justify the actions of Russian leaders.
His father is Ukrainian Jew and mother Belarusian Jew. Ethnically he's full easter European jew
I would reckon he knows far more than you do, I’ll listen to Chomsky. Thanks.
yo this interviewer really asked him "what is your job?" seriously?
Thank you Noam for accepting to interview with this guy. It was an eye opener …..
Chomsky really doesn't think European countries have any agency. Finland and Sweden joined NATO because of the fears of Russian aggression, not because they wanted new markets. They've been selling military stuff quite happily without that. Europe is not controlled by the US. And his reference to the fighting in the Donbas neglects to recognise that the Russians started the conflict by sending ununiformed troops in. He's really rehashing Mearsheimer's opinions which see the world as the province of major powers with smaller states as simply belonging to the sphere of influence of one or another and having no agency of their own.
Russian propaganda constantly portrays Europe this way, yet the USA for many years was unable to convince a number of European countries to increase their defense spending. Now they have.
_´Finland and Sweden joined NATO because of the fears of Russian aggression´_
Of which we have seen zero evidence of.
How much propaganda have you been swallowing…next thing you’ll say that america didn’t start the Vietnam war the iraq Afghanistan yemen somolia Libya Syria Egypt issues…5 billion and Victoria Nuland leaked audio literally proves you wrong.
Norm has lost it. As an elderly person I understand it. It gets foggy and all mashed together as one gets older. The prefrontal lobe is last to mature and the first to atrophy.
True, his hatred of the USA has just festered over the decades until he's for anything that harms the USA and against anything the USA is for. All older folks eyesight gradually diminishes but Chomsky's political vision has atrophied.
Noam has incredible patience. Noam deserves reward for dealing with this guy. Years of practice woth college students:)
I think Noam Chomsky is one of the KNOWN well knowledgeable person on politics and world issues
Injustice anywhere and any time is a threat to justice anywhere and any time.
Yes.
Martin Luther King often said that.
The West has done many bad things just as Russia but to me there is a bit of a difference because Russia is literally trying to take Ukraine and call it Russian territory. Most Western backed tragedies were more of an exaggerated response like to 9/11 and communism. The West was Responding to a threat (however exaggerated and incompetent). Where as Russia is trying to erase the existence of Ukraine and call it Russia.
It’s amazing how sharp Noam still is in his nineties. I’m a centrist politically as the world is quite complicated and human organized nation states are barely hanging on by a thread. I always check in on Noam on any global issue to ensure my information is accurate.
Maybe you should check with someone else. He been horribly wrong multiple times, including with the Laos...
Sharp he is not, his brain froze 50 years ago hypocritical and self righteous in a phony way he is@@francoisbabin2306
Same here...
Indeed! I frequently stop and ask myself, what would Noam Chomsky think about this issue? He's my touchstone. He's my weathervane. 😌
Nation states are a construct of the Europeans. We had democracy in igbo land in Nigeria before colonizers came. We organized our clans and hamlets very well. Elders slef governed their clans and things were better. Democracy at scale with a central ggovt cannot work.
How can someone that makes a living with communication/words have such a lack of basic comprehension skills?
Times Radio clpis are the best, I always watch your clips. You do these interviews very well. Please go on, and inform on Ukraine. I love your work.
I am now remembering why I read Chomsky in my youth. This presenter isn't up to the usual Times standard so putting him up against Chomsky probably wasn't the best idea. It's like an adult vs a child.
A spoiled child 😅
No it is like monkey trying to out-think a chess computer.❤❤❤
This man really showed up to dunk on a 95 year-old and got absolutely dumpstered
Jeffrey Epstein Jeffrey Epstein Jeffrey Epstein Jeffrey Epstein
@@couldbe8348 Your father can't hear you anymore. The CIA killed him for the same reason they once paid him to try to compromise Chomsky: Knew too much!
Don’t think so. Chomsky has totally disregarded the multiple Russian criminal activities. Russia give back all those countries that you occupied after the Second World War including the Japanese islands
@@couldbe8348 Maybe YOU have been associated with Jeffrey Epstein?
so true
Mr. Chomsky is telling the facts. It is not a justification. Additionally, his feelings have nothing to do with anything. It is all about the perception of the leaders who are the decision makers. It is about the projection of how actions will be perceived by the deciders. The deciders can be wrong but we can anticipate how differing sides will perceive others actions divorced of any impact from what non-deciders think.
I struggled to listen to the whole discussion but did so in total respect for Professor Noam Chomsky. The arrogance and rudeness of a British reporter had me questioning why the professor didn't end the interview from the very start. But the professor brushed off the reporter's obnoxious behavior and lucidly presented his viewpoint for all to see. A great intellectual he certainly is.
Matt Chorley is extremely rude as he interrupts Chomsky repeatedly.
Thank you! I had to stop halfway through to make my comments because it was really making me angry. I adore Noam and I wanted to reach through the screen and smack this guy upside his head.
Educated to useless/useful idiot level. Millions like him. No morals, no values, no manners, no nothing other than Me, Me, Me.
The most amazing interviewer is the one who understands what questions to ask and when. It has nothing to do with ones EGO and personal point of view, but the ability to create the space for the guest to express their views and knowledge.
Exactly. I just watched his interview with Piers Morgan, and I admit I was positively impressed.
The interviewer is disrespectful. He thinks he can out think the old G. He think O.G. Is up in age he can pull a fast one. Chomsky is on top of his game.
Age is nothing to this guy, I love seeing this guy still in good health.
The reporter was not in his best to say the least.
I’m just wondering what assessment you did and what evidence is there to suggest that this man is in any other state of health than “BAD/OLD”
@@CreamerMusic I have a degree in reading random medical articles. I also watched a lot of ChubbyEmu. So I know what I am talking about. Also more than 100 hours of zit vids. No relation to this topic. Just bragging.
May Noam Chomsky live for ever!
He does study cognitive science it’s important
@@CreamerMusicbecause no one understands neuroscience and how important cognitive health is so people automatically believe old means bad due to the denial of proper care
AMEN!!! This is what I've been telling everyone and they have been treating me like I'm a crazy conspiracy theorist!!!! THANK YOU MR CHOMSKY!
So tell me what prompted your friends to treat you like a conspiracy theorist ? What did u say to them to get that reaction ? Be specific
@@ilyaprorok7 just saying that the war in Ukraine is actually a proxy war between Russia and the US. A lot of people like to say how it's just because Putin is powerhungry and evil and went crazy and invaded Ukraine out of nowhere. It's wild to me that a lot of people apparently don't know that the US is in NATO either.
@@ilyaprorok7It's probably all the capitals. Flat earthers have the same bad habit.
@@rabbitsandtennis3603 good point. I don't know why I even bothered
Mearsheimer is saying the same thing. Why tickle the bear?? Why?
We have to understand the history since fall of Soviet Union. See Budapest and Minsk11 treaties. Meanwhile China has all the West,s money. What a nightmare we,re all in.