We only see what our eyes want to see... from Madonna We only see what we predict we should see ; modern neuroscience Now we know why that robe can be seen as two sets of colors : context, supposition about the ambient light
2020 here. Year of COVID-19. The only thing that stands out is the imagery of flashing when the mouse is thinking, it looks exactly like a lightning storm from outer space. They keep asking the questions to death and ruin explorations by constantly looking at theory maps. So many in philosophy spend a lifetime and still as elderly men/women cannot answer basic questions without some ongoing guess of what it could be.
I'm lost on one point here. Why would weak predictions cause an external world to seem magical? @9:10 (in the second category where he describes autism symptoms, bottom up processing) Wouldn't we normally associate magical thinking with strong prediction/top down/schizophrenia in the first category? I thought that people with autism were more likely to perceive their environment literally, while people with schizophrenia were more likely to perceive their environment as unrealistic or magical.
I think he means that its magical in the sense that everything stimulates your senses, causing light, color and shapes to be overstimulating and causing sensory overload.
Actually there's evidence that people with schizophrenia perceive the world more realistic (meaning rather based on external stimuli than on their own predictions) than people without psychotic tendencies. Look up the so-called hollow-mask illusion if you're interested in learning about this :) on the other hand, I get your confusion. Many of the symptoms of schizophrenia sound as if top-down-processes dominate their bottom-up perception...
@@schererl181 Yeah that's a decent point, I see where you're coming from. I think part of the issue is that even among researchers there's still so much disagreement over bottom-up vs top-down functioning. I think there's also a great deal of misunderstanding over the full scope of what kind of internal experience would be considered psychosis, especially in how it overlaps across other disorders.
I don't think people with ASD perceive their environment literally. I say so because there's a study that shows that children with ASD has a weak ability to read situational cues (Tell D & Davidson D), since situational cues are basically stimuli present in the environment and they cannot detect it completely they cannot perceive the environment literally.
That shirt change was quite sneaky! I've read his publications. Very novel work!
Hahaha so sneaky! I didn't realise it until I read this! Well observed!
Yooo predictive processing tedtalk i never thought I'd see the day alg goes crazy
Great content and great public speaking!
Awesome vid! That dress demo was great! Eye opening
Wow!
Smooth shirt trick to drive the point
Amazing video. ♥
We only see what our eyes want to see... from Madonna
We only see what we predict we should see ; modern neuroscience
Now we know why that robe can be seen as two sets of colors : context, supposition about the ambient light
Interesting
2020 here. Year of COVID-19. The only thing that stands out is the imagery of flashing when the mouse is thinking, it looks exactly like a lightning storm from outer space. They keep asking the questions to death and ruin explorations by constantly looking at theory maps. So many in philosophy spend a lifetime and still as elderly men/women cannot answer basic questions without some ongoing guess of what it could be.
I'm lost on one point here. Why would weak predictions cause an external world to seem magical? @9:10 (in the second category where he describes autism symptoms, bottom up processing) Wouldn't we normally associate magical thinking with strong prediction/top down/schizophrenia in the first category? I thought that people with autism were more likely to perceive their environment literally, while people with schizophrenia were more likely to perceive their environment as unrealistic or magical.
I think he means that its magical in the sense that everything stimulates your senses, causing light, color and shapes to be overstimulating and causing sensory overload.
Actually there's evidence that people with schizophrenia perceive the world more realistic (meaning rather based on external stimuli than on their own predictions) than people without psychotic tendencies. Look up the so-called hollow-mask illusion if you're interested in learning about this :) on the other hand, I get your confusion. Many of the symptoms of schizophrenia sound as if top-down-processes dominate their bottom-up perception...
@@schererl181 Yeah that's a decent point, I see where you're coming from. I think part of the issue is that even among researchers there's still so much disagreement over bottom-up vs top-down functioning. I think there's also a great deal of misunderstanding over the full scope of what kind of internal experience would be considered psychosis, especially in how it overlaps across other disorders.
I don't think people with ASD perceive their environment literally. I say so because there's a study that shows that children with ASD has a weak ability to read situational cues (Tell D & Davidson D), since situational cues are basically stimuli present in the environment and they cannot detect it completely they cannot perceive the environment literally.
@@joshua_wilson Is it "Autistic Adults Assign Less Weight to Affective Cues When Judging Others’ Ambiguous Emotional States"?