My mom worked at a factory that made Converse back in 1976. She sewed the All-Star logo on high-tops. I showed her my pair of Chuck 70s and she said they were exactly how she remembered them.
I bought my first pair of blue canvas Chuck Taylors in Detroit, back in the early 70's. Had a pair of high tops in black for playing b-ball in high school. Glad to see that they are still growing strong, and improving with age. Damn I'm getting old. :(
Weighing in on the extra stitching! I know 100% the reasoning for it. Although yes, it does provide more lateral support for any light physical activity, and it does help keep the two layers of canvas together, those are only a byproduct. The reason that is there is actually for the tongue :P The tongue widens out near the front of the shoe like a “T” and the left and right side is pieced and stitched into the both sides there to prevent it from moving. If you unlace your C70’s fully and pull open take a peek yourself, you’ll see that the tongue widens out and goes into the side there just around the first eyelet. And now you guys know! 😜
Glad to see the 70's slowly get more and more recognized. Been wearing them for years and always tell people to try them out if they like Chucks. Superior quality and comfort. Can't beat it.
Nick, your Converse reviews are always my favorites! I agree the 70 is a superior shoe for casual wear, but I also liked the defunct Chuck 2. Love that you put your name in your pair, no one is going to steal them. Thanks for this great review Nick.
The Chuck II was too similar to the skate version known as the Converse CONS CTAS (Chuck Taylor All Star). They both feature the Lunarlon insole from Nike. The CTAS has seen many revisions over the years and was originally known as the CTS. What was so great about the CTS were the quality insoles, suede toe caps, and a decent amount of memory foam padding in the tongue and collar. I never understood why Converse had to have the OG Chuck Taylor, the Chuck 70, Chuck Taylor II, and CTAS all at the same time. What made the Chuck II such a standout for you?
Awesome review nick, the 70's are ridiculously good shoes, for someone who wore all stars for 20 years quite literally in the mountains snow and streets of New York and honestly can't think of a shoe I can be without (aside the shoes and boots I have now) but I thought I would just pick up one of these 70's just to see what they were about and even then in my hand I knew it was better immediately and bought it that's how good they are.
I already wear the more expensive Vans vault line, I think the difference in quality definitely justifies the higher price, which isn't that much more expensive, considering there are people paying 500 dollars or even more for shoes. So if you like the 70s better I think you should definitely get it
I got a pair of 70's three weeks ago. They're worth the extra $30. Stronger canvas and better cushioning, and just feel better on my feet. I wasn't sure I liked the off white gloss of the outsole and toecap, but after a few wears, I'm good. Nick's review is the best one I've seen comparing the two.
I've been involved in powerlifting for almost 30 years and in that time, I've always had a pair in my gym bag. IDK if the 70s would be any better / worse in that regard, but they definitely look better.
I always have some while powerlifting. Especially on squat and deadlift day. I have an all black pair. But I’m going to upgrade to some white high top all stars.
I agree, the 70s are Badass. While they failed, I have a pair of Chuck 2s and absolutely adore them 😂 I don't wear them often, but they feel amazing. As far as comfort, the 70s AND Chuck 2 craps all over the standard pair
I've had the All Stars for 10 years, with no problems and just as good as the day I bought them, apart from scuff marks on the white rubber, but after seeing the "smoke effect" design on new converses, have decided to keep them as they are. I put insoles in, and they're still lighter than the 70's which still feel way too heavy to wear all day but I've never had a pair.
Wait wait wait, the same pair for 10 years??? Usually for me the side completely blows out within like 2 years, I've had only one pair out of like six where that didn't happen and I could actually wear out the soles and even then they were pretty much unwearable after 4 years
@@daddykarlmarx6183 yeah, I sadly got rid of them shortly after writing this, alongside other clothes I was wearing after coming back from Oz during the COVID pandemic. I've since been wearing the 70's and honestly they're just not as comfy... AND the sides have developed holes, something they're apparently designed not to do (too late to take them back)
Nice vid. I currently have 12 pair of All star, 6 pair of 70´s and one pair of All star 2. I tend to use the All stars in spring and summer, the 70`s is great in the autumn and wintertime here in Sweden. The All star 2 I never use, I think they suck 😆
Here’s my deal.. the 70’s yes premium etc.. how ever the toes stick up like clowns shoe I HATE THAT.. I fn love the 80’s “made in the USA”version the toe lays flat to the ground never curving up! All converse that are outta the USA do that especially now that Nike owns them. So I stick to eBay always on the hunt for the REAL OG NON CLOWN SHOES 😂 great work on this upload 💯🏆
I still have a pair of the Chuck II low tops. Haven’t worn them that regularly, but they do seem more durable than the originals. Shame they’re not around anymore.
I didn’t even notice the lack of a rigid heel stay/support on the 70s, but that would explain why my heel slips a bit. I am not sure I’ll actually get used to the squishy sole of the 70s.
I love my Chuck IIs, but this video makes me want to get a pair of 70s now too. I might also get the OG Pro Leather, which is similar to the Cons I wore when I played high school basketball in the 1980s.
70's are my favourite.I like classics but they are uncomfortable after a while.I love how comfortable are chuck II but i miss the white stiches and the black line on the sole when i look them.70's are comfortable and have the classic look too.And the materials are better.They look and feel premium.The insole on 70's is also better than the ortholite they use on some converse models like Courtlands.
growing up in panama city, panama in the 80"s we recognized the converse chuck Taylor for the thin tip, "" the toe cap"" was more narrow , the new chuck Taylor were more like clown shoes cost me 20.99 $ in 1981
bought a pair of 70's in 2018 still use them and it's my DAILY ones. They legit barely have any wear and tear, unlike my all stars previously that went doodo after 3 months during the summer
I have both. The allstars that I own seem to be more premium than the traditional allstars. I find the 70s and allstars are comfortable but the 70s are better built
I've been finding people that actually talk about the detail these shoe have cause all i see people do with converse is that they compare the fake and the real.. also they review it.. i love your videos man!! Keep it up!!
Yes, I came here to looking for help with the right size and I have just purchased a pair of low tops. I normally were a size 10.5 in Nikes (Blazers for example). I also have wider feet. I ended up trying out a size 10 first, which fit, but was just a half size too big for me and just looked long. So I tried a 9.5 and the fit was good. Just a little bit on the narrow size, but I have wide feet. Overall the 9.5 is much better look and fit. On the comfort scale, compared to the All-Star, it is a notable improvement to where I can actually wear a pair of chucks and not regret it. The 70s are the way to go and the way chucks should be made period.
Apparently nike took note of your comments about having less variety of colors and styles in the 70!! great review and helped me make some decisions today.
By far the best review of the original and the 70s that I’ve seen on here. The only thing that I still have questions about is the sizing. I get what you’re saying about the differences in sizing between the original and the 70’s but are you saying that Chuck Taylor’s in general run true to size? Because I’ve always had discrepancies with this. In almost all brands of shoes I wear US10.5 - US11 but in Chuck Taylor’s, I wear a US9.5, yet the measurements between the Chuck Taylor’s and other shoes should be standardly the same, right?
I have a pair of All Stars but instead of the lightweight canvas it's more of a thicker "regular" shoe material. The color is a "static gray" with it being mainly gray but it's grainy with black and white specks in it, if that makes sense. Really it's kinda like gray canvas with a soft backing or something. I dunno what the exact model is though. I don't think I've ever gotten more compliments on a pair of shoes than I have with my All Stars, lol. I took up weight lifting early this year and they work great for that too. One day I will have huge man legs like the man himself Nick. 😲🦵 Maybe I'll pick up a pair of the 70s too! Thanks for the review big 🐕, great as always
As far as sizing I normally wear an 8m in the classic chuck But felt that the chuck 70 was still a 1/2 size to big so I’m going to return and try a 7-1/2
I think the OG All-Star shoe is more aesthetically pleasing...I don't like the extra weight of the 70's...I prefer a lighter shoe 👟...Although it does seem that the 70 shoe is better quality and more durable, just wish it was a bit lighter. I would get a pair of each...I like the OG shoes overall look, but they do hurt your feet to wear them for long periods of time...I use to wear my Chuck's just for a few hours or so, but if you want to do a lot of heavy walking I would buy the 70's...So, I would buy both...GOD Bless ✌️
Wish they made the 70s in wide fit. My feet are about size 11 but very wide and all stars/Chucks are made on a narrow last. (Most sneakers are, not just allstars) I know they make all stars in wide fit option but I also doubt if they're wide enough.
I´ve used all stars ages ago but i stop wearing them because they are rather poor quality, and really unconfortable. these 70s made wear converse all star again. It´s amazing it´s such an unique design, they never go out of fashion even if you think it´s not appropriate anymore. Regardless what people may tell you, this model is so much better than the original, the model that all have been waiting for. In a nutshell if you like Chucks , buy the 70s and leave the other to teenagers who can´t afford this model. Great review, i love my red wine pair ;)
i died a little inside when they stopped the production of the chuck taylor 2. it was slick, versatile, modern, had a premium feel, and was quite nice to wear. i'll forever miss that embroidered logo which i've never seen done well in any other brand.
I got my first pair maybe my first year of high school in 1989/90… I can’t remember if I had the black first but I def had a pair of purple high tops. They were from an old Army Navy with old stock so they had a black rubber heel tag.
I have All Stars and 70’s and love them both but have been finding that with the new 70’s I’ve bought they are cutting my heels from the canvas being thicker and less flexible. Has anyone experienced this or has any tips to soften them/stop this happening? My All Stars are by far the most comfy shoes I own.
The 70s are great but the IIs, especially the counter climate ones that kept some water away, were crazy comfortable and had robust construction. I prefer the aesthetics and waxed sole and laces of the 70s any day but the Lunarlon on the IIs feel superior (imo) than the 70s.
The only thing I don’t like with the Chuck 70’s is the thickness of the sole. As I dislike any kind of platform shoes version of a classic pairs, I think this model should be as thin as the Chuck Taylor All Stars. It would be so close to perfection.
I never owned all-stars due to lack of cushion. Since the Chuck 70, I have sold every other sneaker including all my Jordans. I have never felt more liberated than after selling my last J, Cement 3.
Got both the classic chucks and the 70’s , and love them both. One bad thing that bothers me all the time about the Chuck 70 is the tongue. It’s so flimsy and thin, that it creases and my socks can be seen through the shoe. Why haven’t they put the regular tongue ?
ooo the prequel sequel analogy makes sense. I got the 2’s 4-5 years ago and I still use them for court sports. I didn’t use them the first 3 years I got them though. When I looked on site for more, I was wondering where they were- and was considering the 70’s instead
I have the all star summer edition, the upper is made from mesh.. it's different.. better quality, stronger, and off course it's look modern than the canvas one
I am making people aware of the materials used in the pair of CT 70 I purchased Using Rose Anvils dissection of the ct vs ct70 the footbed, I found that the 70 I had still used the same construction as the cheaper ct, I contacted converse and they told me they have the right to use whatever materials they want and that if I did not want the premium 70 I should return them Check out what the shoes are made of before you purchase them
I really really really really don’t like the glossy sole/toebox of the 70s. Enough for me to stick to the all stars. And honestly, the premium leather version of the all stars seem to be just as good as the 70. There’s an outlet near me that sells the standard all stars for just about $30! So, I’ll beat them to the grave ready for another pair!
I think one of the points that you didn't really address was that the 70s look a lot bulkier, apart from the increased weight that you mentioned. It's part of the reason why I personally prefer the standard Chucks, they just look a lot sleeker overall if you're going for that look. Great video otherwise!
@@Stridewise does the added bulk take away from the overall look of the shoe that much? Im in love with my all stars, but they don't last long, do the 70s looks the same just a little thicker?
I have a pair of custom Chuck 70s and I lift in them fairly often. I've never had the All Stars, so I can't compare. But the 70s work great. Caveat, though: I switched out the insert with a cork footbed, so I have no idea how the original one performs. Mostly switched them out because the original one seemed like it needed breaking in and it was thicker than my current insert (plus it won't form to my feet as well as cork will). I imagine it'll work fine though.
@@sneaky.vampire the one I'm using is from a brand called Filson. It's pretty good! Definitely prefer it over the original foam that comes in the shoe, from what little I've tested that one. Although the Filson one also has foam, just with a layer of cork on top of it (otherwise it would probably fall apart pretty quickly if it was purely cork).
I started lifting early this year and wear my regular All Stars. Granted I'm a noob and haven't even squatted my body weight quite yet (yeah I'm a weakling), but I think the 70s would work for me too cause I really don't plan on pushing any weight moving boundaries; I just wanna gain some muscle lol.
I’ve had my All stars for 2 years now and i love them but they are falling apart so i think i am gonna buy the chuck 70 and. I hope they are gonna be more durable
I wish they would bring back the Converse Asylums Those were the comfiest shoes I've ever worn. Sadly they are discontinued and ones on ebay are too small
Looking like #Puck from #Glee in that beach throwback pic! I have the C-70s and love them. The canvas is way thicker and flexible, & the inner sole is so much more comfortable than the old Converse.
Just bought an exact same grey iron pair to the one in this video for $140 AUD but just realised mine is Made in China whereas your one is Made in Vietnam, should i be worried?
Converse are my favorite but I haven't been sure whether to consider the 70. The sole looks too chunky but maybe I should give it a ago. The sunflower 🌻 70s or all white would be my choice
I got my first pair of Chucks in 1971, when they were all made like Chuck 70’s..that’s why Chuck 70’s are the REAL Chucks..by the way, they had the flashy colors back then..mine were gold.
I’ve had 4 pairs (2x70’s + 2Allstars) and I can honestly say. These are the most narrow, uncomfortable, sweat inducing, squeaky shoes I have ever worn. Every pair I owned got worn prob 4 times each and thrown into the wardrobe. It’s a pity because I love how they look. 100% avoid if you like pain free walking.
I just bought em cuz I heard it was good for lifting. I walked to the gym for 40 minutes now I got a bliss. Will it get comfortable overtime? Wish I got the 70s, I felt like the laces look better too.
It's really weird..I bought a pair of Chuck 70s earlier in the year from a place called Opening Ceremony and they're like, half of the features from the 70s in this video and half the regular chucks..not sure what they are exactly. They have the black license plate logo and the one piece of rubber, but instead of the sewn on logo it's the regular one and the insole doesn't say 70 on it..weird haha.
I have VERY flat feet so I have to wear hard molded inserts. My feet are also really wide so they never fit in any Chucks. I love the look but they never work for my feet.
70s are so much better, more comfortable insole, cotton laces, thicker canvas and the higher rubber and extra stitches (doen't blow out around little toe area) they now actually last a year instead of barely surviving in rotation. Plus tbh I just like the look so much more!
gotta ask how the chuck 70 compares to the og chuck but in leather. that shoe is around 10 buck cheaper but its got a chrome tanned leather that is pretty average but for the money i think the leather shoe might very well be the best one you can get. especially if you keep it clean and have a few magic erasers lying around!
thanks heaps for this video. finding out i have a classic, a 70's and a CX. Only after watching this video am i realising how different they are from eachother lol. awesome suff, love the channel
Check out THE TOP 10 BOOTS you can buy (in under 10 minutes!)! th-cam.com/video/9kuHyyefNGE/w-d-xo.html
My mom worked at a factory that made Converse back in 1976. She sewed the All-Star logo on high-tops. I showed her my pair of Chuck 70s and she said they were exactly how she remembered them.
Yea, but how good is her memory these days? Maybe she would say the same thing if you showed her a cat.
That’s so cool
@@garyh4458 silence is free homie
@@nicotine5182 so is speaking
@@garyh4458 wow was that comment really necessary? What kind of loser goes around and leaves these types of comments on TH-cam?
I bought my first pair of blue canvas Chuck Taylors in Detroit, back in the early 70's. Had a pair of high tops in black for playing b-ball in high school. Glad to see that they are still growing strong, and improving with age. Damn I'm getting old. :(
You're just heritage :)
@@Stridewise LOL, thanks Nick.
1964 $8 ( my mom was mad because Keds were $5). Still wearing high white and high black.
@@whatmeworry2006 😍😍😍
I wear my all black pair everywhere there great I feel like I'm more of a old school guy even though I'm only 16 as of now
Weighing in on the extra stitching! I know 100% the reasoning for it. Although yes, it does provide more lateral support for any light physical activity, and it does help keep the two layers of canvas together, those are only a byproduct. The reason that is there is actually for the tongue :P
The tongue widens out near the front of the shoe like a “T” and the left and right side is pieced and stitched into the both sides there to prevent it from moving. If you unlace your C70’s fully and pull open take a peek yourself, you’ll see that the tongue widens out and goes into the side there just around the first eyelet.
And now you guys know! 😜
That was one of the first things I noticed about my chuck 70s! It was so much wider than I was used to
The more you know
Glad to see the 70's slowly get more and more recognized. Been wearing them for years and always tell people to try them out if they like Chucks. Superior quality and comfort. Can't beat it.
Yes! Amazed it took me so long to cotton on to them
Personally I dont like the off white.
@@steve00alt70 same thing here, I just prefer the aesthetics of the original in general
Chuck 2's were understated, loved them.
Same.
When they got discontinued, I bought 10 pairs. They are great. (I just started to try the CX, what do you think about them?)
@@michaelkrug I haven't picked any up yet. I don't like the styling as much as I did on the 2s, but the quality seems good based on reviews.
Got a blue pair love em
I thought I was the only one that liked the 2s.
Nick, your Converse reviews are always my favorites! I agree the 70 is a superior shoe for casual wear, but I also liked the defunct Chuck 2. Love that you put your name in your pair, no one is going to steal them. Thanks for this great review Nick.
The Chuck II was too similar to the skate version known as the Converse CONS CTAS (Chuck Taylor All Star). They both feature the Lunarlon insole from Nike. The CTAS has seen many revisions over the years and was originally known as the CTS. What was so great about the CTS were the quality insoles, suede toe caps, and a decent amount of memory foam padding in the tongue and collar.
I never understood why Converse had to have the OG Chuck Taylor, the Chuck 70, Chuck Taylor II, and CTAS all at the same time. What made the Chuck II such a standout for you?
@@ianturnbow7011 I really loved the extra support and cushioning from the new insole, it was more comfortable to wear all day.
@@frankb5693 I second that about the insole. It makes a big difference.
Awesome review nick, the 70's are ridiculously good shoes, for someone who wore all stars for 20 years quite literally in the mountains snow and streets of New York and honestly can't think of a shoe I can be without (aside the shoes and boots I have now) but I thought I would just pick up one of these 70's just to see what they were about and even then in my hand I knew it was better immediately and bought it that's how good they are.
Great review! I've been wearing All Stars for well over 20 years, and I'm finally going to spend the extra $30 for the 70's next time I buy a pair.
You won't regret it, Eric!
If you remember you should come back to let us know how you like the upgrade 🙏🏽
Worth it..I always considered this 70s reissue for my next converse.
I already wear the more expensive Vans vault line, I think the difference in quality definitely justifies the higher price, which isn't that much more expensive, considering there are people paying 500 dollars or even more for shoes. So if you like the 70s better I think you should definitely get it
I got a pair of 70's three weeks ago. They're worth the extra $30. Stronger canvas and better cushioning, and just feel better on my feet. I wasn't sure I liked the off white gloss of the outsole and toecap, but after a few wears, I'm good. Nick's review is the best one I've seen comparing the two.
I've been involved in powerlifting for almost 30 years and in that time, I've always had a pair in my gym bag. IDK if the 70s would be any better / worse in that regard, but they definitely look better.
I always have some while powerlifting. Especially on squat and deadlift day. I have an all black pair. But I’m going to upgrade to some white high top all stars.
@@yeetfeet1878 white looks better.
@@Nikes62 agreed
i loved the chuck 2. it was utterly elegant, premium, and nicer.
I agree, the 70s are Badass. While they failed, I have a pair of Chuck 2s and absolutely adore them 😂 I don't wear them often, but they feel amazing. As far as comfort, the 70s AND Chuck 2 craps all over the standard pair
I've had the All Stars for 10 years, with no problems and just as good as the day I bought them, apart from scuff marks on the white rubber, but after seeing the "smoke effect" design on new converses, have decided to keep them as they are. I put insoles in, and they're still lighter than the 70's which still feel way too heavy to wear all day but I've never had a pair.
Me who wears Timberlands to go to school: 👀
Wait wait wait, the same pair for 10 years??? Usually for me the side completely blows out within like 2 years, I've had only one pair out of like six where that didn't happen and I could actually wear out the soles and even then they were pretty much unwearable after 4 years
@@daddykarlmarx6183 yeah, I sadly got rid of them shortly after writing this, alongside other clothes I was wearing after coming back from Oz during the COVID pandemic. I've since been wearing the 70's and honestly they're just not as comfy... AND the sides have developed holes, something they're apparently designed not to do (too late to take them back)
Nice vid. I currently have 12 pair of All star, 6 pair of 70´s and one pair of All star 2. I tend to use the All stars in spring and summer, the 70`s is great in the autumn and wintertime here in Sweden. The All star 2 I never use, I think they suck 😆
I was struggling on wether to buy all stars or 70's and this video really helped , i just ordered 70's :) You explained everything really well!
Just bought me a pair today of all stars and they are the lightest shoe and super good for driving in they glue to your feet
Here’s my deal.. the 70’s yes premium etc.. how ever the toes stick up like clowns shoe I HATE THAT.. I fn love the 80’s “made in the USA”version the toe lays flat to the ground never curving up! All converse that are outta the USA do that especially now that Nike owns them. So I stick to eBay always on the hunt for the REAL OG NON CLOWN SHOES 😂 great work on this upload 💯🏆
I knew there was something about the toe that didn’t look right!
Fuck, yeah! LOL
The toe sticking up is more functional and makes the shoe less likely to deteriorate over time from repeated bending.
I still have a pair of the Chuck II low tops. Haven’t worn them that regularly, but they do seem more durable than the originals. Shame they’re not around anymore.
Yeah I still wear my Chuck IIs!
I didn’t even notice the lack of a rigid heel stay/support on the 70s, but that would explain why my heel slips a bit. I am not sure I’ll actually get used to the squishy sole of the 70s.
I love my Chuck IIs, but this video makes me want to get a pair of 70s now too. I might also get the OG Pro Leather, which is similar to the Cons I wore when I played high school basketball in the 1980s.
70's are my favourite.I like classics but they are uncomfortable after a while.I love how comfortable are chuck II but i miss the white stiches and the black line on the sole when i look them.70's are comfortable and have the classic look too.And the materials are better.They look and feel premium.The insole on 70's is also better than the ortholite they use on some converse models like Courtlands.
Did you size down or ordered the same size as your classics?
growing up in panama city, panama in the 80"s we recognized the converse chuck Taylor for the thin tip, "" the toe cap"" was more narrow , the new chuck Taylor were more like clown shoes cost me 20.99 $ in 1981
bought a pair of 70's in 2018 still use them and it's my DAILY ones. They legit barely have any wear and tear, unlike my all stars previously that went doodo after 3 months during the summer
I have both. The allstars that I own seem to be more premium than the traditional allstars. I find the 70s and allstars are comfortable but the 70s are better built
I agree!
hello, which of this pair is best for wide feet?
I've been finding people that actually talk about the detail these shoe have cause all i see people do with converse is that they compare the fake and the real.. also they review it.. i love your videos man!! Keep it up!!
Delighted you enjoyed this one, Azlan! Thanks for commenting.
Yes, I came here to looking for help with the right size and I have just purchased a pair of low tops. I normally were a size 10.5 in Nikes (Blazers for example). I also have wider feet. I ended up trying out a size 10 first, which fit, but was just a half size too big for me and just looked long. So I tried a 9.5 and the fit was good. Just a little bit on the narrow size, but I have wide feet. Overall the 9.5 is much better look and fit. On the comfort scale, compared to the All-Star, it is a notable improvement to where I can actually wear a pair of chucks and not regret it. The 70s are the way to go and the way chucks should be made period.
Apparently nike took note of your comments about having less variety of colors and styles in the 70!! great review and helped me make some decisions today.
loving the comfort and lightweight of All Stars but planning to buy the chuck 70 for my collection 😊❤️
happy to find this channel! ❤️
Good choice! Glad to have you here, bro.
Yo Nick I highly recommend you check out the Converse ADDICT from Japan. Two words, Vibram sole.
This seems to be the consensus!
By far the best review of the original and the 70s that I’ve seen on here. The only thing that I still have questions about is the sizing. I get what you’re saying about the differences in sizing between the original and the 70’s but are you saying that Chuck Taylor’s in general run true to size? Because I’ve always had discrepancies with this. In almost all brands of shoes I wear US10.5 - US11 but in Chuck Taylor’s, I wear a US9.5, yet the measurements between the Chuck Taylor’s and other shoes should be standardly the same, right?
I have a pair of All Stars but instead of the lightweight canvas it's more of a thicker "regular" shoe material. The color is a "static gray" with it being mainly gray but it's grainy with black and white specks in it, if that makes sense. Really it's kinda like gray canvas with a soft backing or something. I dunno what the exact model is though.
I don't think I've ever gotten more compliments on a pair of shoes than I have with my All Stars, lol.
I took up weight lifting early this year and they work great for that too. One day I will have huge man legs like the man himself Nick. 😲🦵
Maybe I'll pick up a pair of the 70s too! Thanks for the review big 🐕, great as always
As far as sizing I normally wear an 8m in the classic chuck
But felt that the chuck 70 was still a 1/2 size to big so I’m going to return and try a 7-1/2
I think the OG All-Star shoe is more aesthetically pleasing...I don't like the extra weight of the 70's...I prefer a lighter shoe 👟...Although it does seem that the 70 shoe is better quality and more durable, just wish it was a bit lighter. I would get a pair of each...I like the OG shoes overall look, but they do hurt your feet to wear them for long periods of time...I use to wear my Chuck's just for a few hours or so, but if you want to do a lot of heavy walking I would buy the 70's...So, I would buy both...GOD Bless ✌️
Wish they made the 70s in wide fit.
My feet are about size 11 but very wide and all stars/Chucks are made on a narrow last.
(Most sneakers are, not just allstars)
I know they make all stars in wide fit option but I also doubt if they're wide enough.
Just go true to size and you will be ok. I wear Jordan 1 in 8.5 and 8.5 chucks are fine
Chuck 2s were great. Don't let anybody tell you otherwise.
Haha I'm glad someone likes them
FaCtS 🙂
I liked them as well. Was bummed that they Don't make any anymore. I mean just keep them like one pair a year.
Impeccable review!! You’ve answered all of my questions. Thank you so much!! ❤️
Great review, I remember when the Chuck's were $17 back when I was a kid. I grew up in the 80's 😂
I love my chuck 2s. So glad it has that lunarlon insole in it. I also have a collection full of allstars and 70s.
I brought my first chuck 70s 3 years ago. In red. The best converse I ever brought . But I want black ones now
Those 70s look way better. Feel amazing also. Never liked those all stars.
Just picked up the navy high top All Stars for $24.99 clearance at the Nike outlet
Not bad
Great video! I've had my 70's around six months and I LOVE them. I work s very physical job and walk 10k+ a night. They're still brand new!!!
Fantastic, Cesre! Yeah I'm a real sucker for thick canvas and the way it ages, the 70s are miles better in that regard.
I´ve used all stars ages ago but i stop wearing them because they are rather poor quality, and really unconfortable.
these 70s made wear converse all star again. It´s amazing it´s such an unique design, they never go out of fashion even if you think it´s not appropriate anymore. Regardless what people may tell you, this model is so much better than the original, the model that all have been waiting for.
In a nutshell if you like Chucks , buy the 70s and leave the other to teenagers who can´t afford this model.
Great review, i love my red wine pair ;)
YES. They're the shoes that give you faith in Chucks again.
@@Stridewise btw thanks for the review, very informative
i died a little inside when they stopped the production of the chuck taylor 2. it was slick, versatile, modern, had a premium feel, and was quite nice to wear. i'll forever miss that embroidered logo which i've never seen done well in any other brand.
I was so surprised when I heard it had been discontinued!
Was my favorite aswell, so slick and very comfortable !
Yep they were amazing
I got my first pair maybe my first year of high school in 1989/90… I can’t remember if I had the black first but I def had a pair of purple high tops. They were from an old Army Navy with old stock so they had a black rubber heel tag.
Not sure if they had an option in the past, but they should allow color options for the toe caps.
I have All Stars and 70’s and love them both but have been finding that with the new 70’s I’ve bought they are cutting my heels from the canvas being thicker and less flexible. Has anyone experienced this or has any tips to soften them/stop this happening? My All Stars are by far the most comfy shoes I own.
Long sock
If only the 70 came in a wide width for those of us with wide feet it would be a must buy
The 70s are great but the IIs, especially the counter climate ones that kept some water away, were crazy comfortable and had robust construction. I prefer the aesthetics and waxed sole and laces of the 70s any day but the Lunarlon on the IIs feel superior (imo) than the 70s.
Wish the 70s had a wide option... but yea I use the all stars for lifting and a more beat one pair as house shoes. And my 70s as my daily shoe
The only thing I don’t like with the Chuck 70’s is the thickness of the sole. As I dislike any kind of platform shoes version of a classic pairs, I think this model should be as thin as the Chuck Taylor All Stars. It would be so close to perfection.
I think the decision was made with greater durability in mind, but I see your point
I never owned all-stars due to lack of cushion. Since the Chuck 70, I have sold every other sneaker including all my Jordans. I have never felt more liberated than after selling my last J, Cement 3.
Got both the classic chucks and the 70’s , and love them both. One bad thing that bothers me all the time about the Chuck 70 is the tongue. It’s so flimsy and thin, that it creases and my socks can be seen through the shoe. Why haven’t they put the regular tongue ?
Still prefer the regular chucks in terms of design
agreed
If they make these in the wider fit I'll grab a pair. Chucks in regular width kill my feet badly, and my feet aren't even particularly wide.
That's a common complaint, sorry to hear it man. Every foot should be able to wear the most iconic sneakers of all time!
The Chuck Taylor II❤️😭
The bunch of Taylors to the face LOL, wasn't expecting that
Shoulda started the video with that haha
ooo the prequel sequel analogy makes sense. I got the 2’s 4-5 years ago and I still use them for court sports. I didn’t use them the first 3 years I got them though. When I looked on site for more, I was wondering where they were- and was considering the 70’s instead
I loved having the excuse to diss Xmen Origins :)
You ever try the Converse CTAS pro skate shoes? In my opinion they're the best chucks by far. Especially the suede models.
I have the all star summer edition, the upper is made from mesh.. it's different.. better quality, stronger, and off course it's look modern than the canvas one
I am making people aware of the materials used in the pair of CT 70 I purchased
Using Rose Anvils dissection of the ct vs ct70 the footbed, I found that the 70 I had still used the same construction as the cheaper ct, I contacted converse and they told me they have the right to use whatever materials they want and that if I did not want the premium 70 I should return them
Check out what the shoes are made of before you purchase them
I really really really really don’t like the glossy sole/toebox of the 70s. Enough for me to stick to the all stars. And honestly, the premium leather version of the all stars seem to be just as good as the 70. There’s an outlet near me that sells the standard all stars for just about $30! So, I’ll beat them to the grave ready for another pair!
I think one of the points that you didn't really address was that the 70s look a lot bulkier, apart from the increased weight that you mentioned. It's part of the reason why I personally prefer the standard Chucks, they just look a lot sleeker overall if you're going for that look. Great video otherwise!
Nah man I mentioned the bulk several times! Totally legit reason to prefer the All Star
@@Stridewise does the added bulk take away from the overall look of the shoe that much? Im in love with my all stars, but they don't last long, do the 70s looks the same just a little thicker?
I use these chucks to lift as well, but I think I might go with the 70s to lift in as well and test it out.
I have a pair of custom Chuck 70s and I lift in them fairly often. I've never had the All Stars, so I can't compare. But the 70s work great. Caveat, though: I switched out the insert with a cork footbed, so I have no idea how the original one performs. Mostly switched them out because the original one seemed like it needed breaking in and it was thicker than my current insert (plus it won't form to my feet as well as cork will). I imagine it'll work fine though.
@@Cemmos Oooh thanks for the tip! Do you have any recommendation on any cork footbeds?
@@sneaky.vampire the one I'm using is from a brand called Filson. It's pretty good! Definitely prefer it over the original foam that comes in the shoe, from what little I've tested that one. Although the Filson one also has foam, just with a layer of cork on top of it (otherwise it would probably fall apart pretty quickly if it was purely cork).
@@Cemmos yeah i just saw some from filson when i googled the cork footbeds.
I started lifting early this year and wear my regular All Stars. Granted I'm a noob and haven't even squatted my body weight quite yet (yeah I'm a weakling), but I think the 70s would work for me too cause I really don't plan on pushing any weight moving boundaries; I just wanna gain some muscle lol.
Wow! I learned so much! Thank you ✌️💚
I’ve had my All stars for 2 years now and i love them but they are falling apart so i think i am gonna buy the chuck 70 and. I hope they are gonna be more durable
Unexpected but let’s go! Love the shoe review
Haha thanks Camden
I wish they would bring back the Converse Asylums
Those were the comfiest shoes I've ever worn. Sadly they are discontinued and ones on ebay are too small
I got a pair of black chuck 70's last yr and have only wore them a couple of times. I prefer all stars
I honestly bought a pair of 70 just because people say that they last much longer.
Looking like #Puck from #Glee in that beach throwback pic! I have the C-70s and love them. The canvas is way thicker and flexible, & the inner sole is so much more comfortable than the old Converse.
They're not the same since they moved production from North Carolina to Vietnam. Canvas is lighter, as you stated. Love your brit accent.
U mean made in Vietnam chuck 70 is lighter or say different than made in Carolina chuck 70?
Why did Chuck II's flop?! I'm still wearing all white lows and they are so comfortable. Also have high top greys and they are my go to.
Just bought an exact same grey iron pair to the one in this video for $140 AUD but just realised mine is Made in China whereas your one is Made in Vietnam, should i be worried?
I don’t think you should worry, I’ve own 4 pairs now and they lasted me a while school year
@@Zamn_daniel Awesome thats good to hear.
Nick, did you check out the outsole on the new Whiskey and Tobacco colorways of the Captain released recently?
The Storm Lug! Yup. Super grippy, great for winter.
Great video 👍🏾 Appreciated all the information
Converse are my favorite but I haven't been sure whether to consider the 70. The sole looks too chunky but maybe I should give it a ago. The sunflower 🌻 70s or all white would be my choice
I got my first pair of Chucks in 1971, when they were all made like Chuck 70’s..that’s why Chuck 70’s are the REAL Chucks..by the way, they had the flashy colors back then..mine were gold.
Wow, I never catch your videos this early lol. Cheers!
Welcome back!
I still love my Chuck Taylor IIs. Strike me dead but I love them.
The narrower toe on the 70 kills it for me.
everything I needed to know, thanks
I’ve had 4 pairs (2x70’s + 2Allstars) and I can honestly say. These are the most narrow, uncomfortable, sweat inducing, squeaky shoes I have ever worn. Every pair I owned got worn prob 4 times each and thrown into the wardrobe. It’s a pity because I love how they look.
100% avoid if you like pain free walking.
I just bought em cuz I heard it was good for lifting. I walked to the gym for 40 minutes now I got a bliss. Will it get comfortable overtime? Wish I got the 70s, I felt like the laces look better too.
It's really weird..I bought a pair of Chuck 70s earlier in the year from a place called Opening Ceremony and they're like, half of the features from the 70s in this video and half the regular chucks..not sure what they are exactly. They have the black license plate logo and the one piece of rubber, but instead of the sewn on logo it's the regular one and the insole doesn't say 70 on it..weird haha.
8:30 - 8:41 your right black sneaker and your left gray sneaker make the perfect couple 🖤🤍 🎊🎉✨🛐
You know it doesn't look that bad does it
@@Stridewise I love it 😍🥰😘
I have VERY flat feet so I have to wear hard molded inserts. My feet are also really wide so they never fit in any Chucks. I love the look but they never work for my feet.
Seeing your name written inside your shoe is too cute.
Thanks so much for posting! Best Chuck 70 reveiw l've seen. (:
Eyy thanks a lot Karolyn!! So glad you liked it
@@Stridewise Would you say that its better to buy Converse in-store or online?
70s are so much better, more comfortable insole, cotton laces, thicker canvas and the higher rubber and extra stitches (doen't blow out around little toe area) they now actually last a year instead of barely surviving in rotation. Plus tbh I just like the look so much more!
thank u so much for this amazing helpful video
loved the video man🙏
Great info. Love it...🥰🙏
Can anyone else please confirm the 0.5 down sizing recommended?
I ordered in my size and glad I did. Didn't size down. And the wide width, too! They fit perfectly.
Depends if you wear thin or thick socks.
gotta ask how the chuck 70 compares to the og chuck but in leather. that shoe is around 10 buck cheaper but its got a chrome tanned leather that is pretty average but for the money i think the leather shoe might very well be the best one you can get. especially if you keep it clean and have a few magic erasers lying around!
thanks heaps for this video. finding out i have a classic, a 70's and a CX. Only after watching this video am i realising how different they are from eachother lol. awesome suff, love the channel
Keep your Chuck clean...? WTF. You NEVER clean your Chucks....
Cdg play converse is what I’m rocking for years
tbh i like the all star leather over all
About to cop now