Physicist Reacts to Wormholes Explained by Kurzgesagt

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 11 ก.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 83

  • @DylanJDance
    @DylanJDance  2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    oops, forgot to show you what the space ORCs look like. Have a read and check em out here: www.forbes.com/sites/jamiecartereurope/2022/03/31/have-scientists-really-found-wormholes-through-space-time-the-truth-about-the-ghostly-odd-radio-circles/?sh=394606d92c17

    • @joris4235
      @joris4235 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Mate it’s 1 am, gotta fix your upload schedule or I’m gunna break my sleep schedule

    • @Foxner
      @Foxner 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Thanks for the link, I was trying to find what you were talking about with the ORCs.

    • @alhsihtisharfnao7816
      @alhsihtisharfnao7816 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@joris4235 lol

    • @cadejust6777
      @cadejust6777 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@alhsihtisharfnao7816
      How Dare You Say That Dont Be So Transphobic.

  • @JM221b
    @JM221b 2 ปีที่แล้ว +60

    When you mentioned that scientists love to lie I was reminded about the video of Kurzegesagt "We lied to you" which is about all the lies scientists tell to create an easier to understand story. It's a bit of a different video than what you normally watch but I definitely reccomend it!

    • @BigBoss-sm9xj
      @BigBoss-sm9xj 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Heck yeah!

    • @chitorunya
      @chitorunya ปีที่แล้ว +4

      "... and we'll do it again"

    • @cadejust6777
      @cadejust6777 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@chitorunya
      How Dare You Say That Dont Be So Transphobic.

    • @chitorunya
      @chitorunya ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@cadejust6777 ???

  • @remo27
    @remo27 2 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    "So for now , we only know that wormholes exist in our hearts..." I lost it :)

  • @Gradymeister
    @Gradymeister 2 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    Absolutely love the content rolling in!
    The longer the better! You could start a podcast and just talk to a brick wall about astronomy and I'd be interested.

  • @aaronmicalowe
    @aaronmicalowe 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    What I find impressive is that Einstein predicted the existence of black holes before they were discovered based on the math, so although we may criticise the math for not being realistic, there are times when it predicts real things before we find them. Reminds me of helium. It was theorised as a cause of spectral lines from the sun 150 years before it was discovered on Earth proving its existence.

  • @Mr.Lanternn
    @Mr.Lanternn 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Dude, your videos are great! If I had one suggestion tho it would be to give the audio some love, the video you're reacting is a little bit too loud. That's stuff you'll get with experience tho, and I'll be here to watch you get that experience

  • @dejamko8018
    @dejamko8018 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Bro seriously you I love to here you talk about physics and math stuff. I really want to know what orc’s are. Can you please start a community like a discord. That would be amazing keep up doing what you do!!!!!

  • @fruity2ty
    @fruity2ty 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Loving the Daily Dance man! These videos have been too notch as well. Keep it up!

  • @georgewilliamsiii4677
    @georgewilliamsiii4677 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Mathemagics was a real thing to the ancients.
    I love this book series where in the background, a theoretical physicist "finished a long complicated equation with a flourish. And he promptly disappeared."

  • @MrDestroys
    @MrDestroys 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I really like how you explain things

  • @RyansMusicTherapy
    @RyansMusicTherapy 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    is the density really infinity or is our grasp of spacetime on too small of a scale to measure up to the level black holes take you mathematically.
    like adding 2+2+2+2+2+2+2 etc to grab an infinity instead of looking at things on a more cosmic scale the way exponents allow us to do.

  • @cameronbannick
    @cameronbannick 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    i’ve actually always wondered that since Einsteins Math predicted Wormholes could exist, even if they don’t exist naturally and the “programming” of the universe as we understand it can “allow for it” could we make them anyway

    • @benbashor649
      @benbashor649 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      the problem is people seem to be using math to dictate what is possible in the real world as opposed to describing the real world using math.
      it really is not a 2 way street.
      wormholes in practice have to compensate for environmental factors, such as absolute speed (which we cannot really measure, we just go by local frames of reference) the expansion of distances/space. the density of matter in said volume of space. and all localized forces at both ends. while this can work on a single particle there is no way you're going to maintain all factors needed to send all particles from one place to another and maintaining the same form, reality works on an infinite gradient and mathematicians love to round.

    • @cameronbannick
      @cameronbannick 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@benbashor649 oh i’m insinuating we are even close to doing that and assuming Einstein was correct im just curious if there are things in nature that are possible but not natural. Almost like Human Beings don’t have wings but we built airplanes so we can

  • @dubbymazlo
    @dubbymazlo 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I really hope Kurzgesagt does a collaboration with you soon about space stuff... I cant get enough of these!

  • @pihuvermaanitaanilsoni
    @pihuvermaanitaanilsoni 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Blud really continued his sentence 💀 14:24

  • @killman369547
    @killman369547 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The time travel aspect would be neat. But if i were tinkering around with wormholes i'd want them more for transportation in the here and now. It'd basically be the closest thing to teleportation. Imagine opening a wormhole between earth and the moon, or mars. We could colonize both quite rapidly

  • @zelenisok
    @zelenisok 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Yet again asking for reaction to the "Molecular Shape of You" by A Capella Science, it's an awesome science video.

  • @xxmysticexpertxx113
    @xxmysticexpertxx113 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I discovered a worm hole occurring in Earth's natural processes. However, it was very unintriguing...
    Seeing a bunch of worms in a dirt hole is not something that I find surprising (personally).

    • @xxmysticexpertxx113
      @xxmysticexpertxx113 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Update: Apparently i was beat to the punch - 4:09

  • @pasttense69
    @pasttense69 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I would’ve loved to hear your thoughts on white holes. I remember discovering them a long time ago and I found that the idea of them aren’t touched on too much and have always wondered why

  • @AkashPandey-lz2rj
    @AkashPandey-lz2rj 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Sir your fan from india love your videos

  • @Patrickisat
    @Patrickisat 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I love watching you and Anton Petrov. Two of my fav science people.

  • @lubomirkubasdQw4w9WgXcQ
    @lubomirkubasdQw4w9WgXcQ 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    00:10:10 that is called a door

  • @kuyab9122
    @kuyab9122 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Dylan, you have a nice looking microphone. But compared to the audio of other content creators, I find yours lower in volume and in quality. Hope this could be improved. Cheers!

  • @julianmanrique3411
    @julianmanrique3411 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Great video as always Dylan!!!
    I have a doubt though. when you said that the singularity has infinite density, volume, gravity and mass, is the last one right? I thought mass wasn't infinite at the singularity but rather finite. I know singularities don't probably exist but if they did, would their mass be infinite?

    • @MaxMax-ox2dl
      @MaxMax-ox2dl 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Exactly if it’s infinity then plank constant would be broken.

  • @Matyanson
    @Matyanson 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sorry to write this under every video, I just don't know if you have read my comments.
    I just wanted to say that I highly recommend the channel "ScienceClic English".
    I love how they can explain complicated topics clearly by intuition without compromising on accuracy while still being captivating. Every bit is nicely spaced out to give the audience time to process, and no information is extra.
    I find all of their videos amazing, but if I had to pick one, it would be "What is General Relativity?". They also made an explanation + visualization of Falling into the black hole, I'd say more accurate than Kurzgesagt and I learned more from it.
    I love both Kurzgesagt and ScienceClic English. I think Kurzgesagt is more on the entertainment side while ScienceClic is more on the rigor, educational side. But you learn super interesting things from both of them!

  • @DanBorens
    @DanBorens ปีที่แล้ว

    Could a wormhole be propped open with fusion? I mean it’s the only chemical process that we know actually repels gravity in stars? Or am I overlooking something huge?

  • @allstars9915
    @allstars9915 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    arigatou goazaimasu sensei , i commented about requesting you to react on this video of wormholes by kurzegesagt , i love your videos and love what you are doing for us physics lovers

  • @lifewriter7455
    @lifewriter7455 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Breaking Wormholes in Spacetime always creates such Exciting Reactions. 🖤

  • @johneonas6628
    @johneonas6628 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you for the video.

  • @TechGuyDane
    @TechGuyDane 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video as always, Dylan. Whether you're trying to be educational or not, I always learn.

  • @MrSirSquishy
    @MrSirSquishy 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I personally think that conventional backwards time travel is impossible. If it was possible, then we'd know about it from future civilizations or people going back in time to out time period or before out time period. Either that or all civilizations die before time travel is discovered.

    • @julianmanrique3411
      @julianmanrique3411 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I think you're assuming that when we reach are future, if we were to time travel to the past, then people from such past would know that time travel exists, but the thing is, there is no line where we have reached our future already and we travel to the past. The reason we don't see time travellers from the future is because we haven't reached it yet.

  • @claytonyoung1351
    @claytonyoung1351 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Information can escape a black hole

    • @julianmanrique3411
      @julianmanrique3411 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      That is not confirmed. It is true that the most plausible answer to the information paradox is that it isn't lost, but rather escapes somehow from the blackhole since information loss would break a crucial law of quantum mechanics. However, we haven't solved it yet, so we can't say for sure that information escapes.

    • @claytonyoung1351
      @claytonyoung1351 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@julianmanrique3411 if it didn't, we wouldn't know they were there.

  • @IIMonkeManII
    @IIMonkeManII 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    i ve been waiting for this

  • @greenpeasuit
    @greenpeasuit 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    When you put a bowling ball on a trampoline, the trampoline is curved because the bowling ball is pulling toward the center of mass. If space is curved by objects, one must ask oneself, what else are they pulling toward extradimensionally, and how?

  • @funlightfactory6031
    @funlightfactory6031 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Well Dylan, if you don't cut it as a physicist, you always got male model in your back pocket.

  • @SirTacoman
    @SirTacoman 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Yooo, my fav topic, talked about by my favorite youtuber

  • @SkyGodKing
    @SkyGodKing 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is there a link to where we have made negative energy/mass stuff

  • @SmartK8
    @SmartK8 ปีที่แล้ว

    The Einstein equations don't break for singularities. You're just refusing to accept the result. "Inside" of singularity is simply not part of spacetime - thus infinities and other non-sense results.
    You cannot travel FTL. This Universe exists only because of this limitation. You can't go around it. Not even travelling outside of spacetime, and then returning back. It would still break causality. Causality is the only reason Universe exists, otherwise it would be chaos. That's what is exactly is outside spacetime, and also inside the singularity (because that's also outside of spacetime).

  • @kyonkyon4376
    @kyonkyon4376 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Love the content!!

  • @elisei4ik
    @elisei4ik ปีที่แล้ว

    i would recommend you to react to another channel called ScienceClic. It has a lot of interesting and well explained stuff.

  • @AcVinicious
    @AcVinicious 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    when blackholes are so heavy and have a strong gravity. why do they kurve spacetime and do not attract it to its very center. or do they ? O.oo.O

  • @eggman9271
    @eggman9271 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I know about zero things about science besides the super super basic stuff but I've always wondered if matter needs to be made of something to be real and exist then wouldn't it be infinite? Because it needs to be made of something always it can't exist without there being something there to make it so it would be infinitely small right?

  • @LeonidSaykin
    @LeonidSaykin 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    portal from the portal gun

  • @TimIsThe18373
    @TimIsThe18373 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You look and sound so similar to the TH-camr WadZee

  • @mastershooter64
    @mastershooter64 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    come on dylan pull out some differential geometry and tensor calculus

  • @fischi9129
    @fischi9129 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Whe they say fling the 2. end of a wormhole away... me: yeet em into the void :)

  • @nobodx
    @nobodx 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Isn’t timetravel* already possible?
    Mass slows down time, more mass slows time even more.
    So mass allows some kinda one way timetravel into the future.

    • @julianmanrique3411
      @julianmanrique3411 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Well, yes it is, but only reaching relativistic speeds or being near an object with a huge gravitational field(such as a blackhole). With our current technology, it is not possible. And what dylan is talking about regards time travelling to the past, not to the future.

    • @nobodx
      @nobodx 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@julianmanrique3411 every mass causes time dialation (even yourself) but the effect is minuscule.
      But if i recall correctly, astronauts age a few seconds less that people on earth

  • @razujd415
    @razujd415 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Please react to this hole uap movement going on, more of the theoretical physics aspects of the hole phenomenon so say

    • @razujd415
      @razujd415 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I would recommend Chris lehto

  • @MICHAELSOUTH
    @MICHAELSOUTH 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    PLEASE REACT TO SCIENCEPHILE AI!!!!

  • @offlinecyberpunk6507
    @offlinecyberpunk6507 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    You should realy make watch Element Zero - Mass Effect Core from Lore Core Multiverse.

  • @theghostoftheuchiha115
    @theghostoftheuchiha115 ปีที่แล้ว

    Idk what is going on but I like it

  • @glenjennett
    @glenjennett ปีที่แล้ว

    I like how you think and even though I'm not a scientist, I have my own theories I want to share with the world someday. I'd love to discuss these things if you are interested.

  • @kripto8231
    @kripto8231 ปีที่แล้ว

    is magic infinate_

  • @lsd-rickb-1728
    @lsd-rickb-1728 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    You're a handsome physicist

  • @MeganaetherJackson-cx9ef
    @MeganaetherJackson-cx9ef ปีที่แล้ว

    The only thing that can travel threw a worm whole as a human with out a space ship made of exsotic matter is our consciousness... Energy. 100% already done 😉

  • @notcallum9899
    @notcallum9899 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    anyone know why kurzgesagt’s work is the main thing he reacts to?

    • @IamAlixmusic
      @IamAlixmusic 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Because they have a lot of views and he wants their audience…it’s a way of gaining an audience he wouldn’t have a way of touching otherwise…you have to realize they have several several scientist that help them develop their videos.

  • @scavenge7177
    @scavenge7177 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    If you don't have an ad blocker by next video i'm gonna prove the earth is flat just to spite you

  • @mropoku
    @mropoku 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    More dbz

  • @kawasaki7199
    @kawasaki7199 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    First