In this country, all Pakeha benefit from white privilege, although not to same degree. On the whole, men tend to have more of it than women. Professional people tend to have more of it than manual or unemployed workers. But as a group, white privilege is something white folk all share. It is the privilege of getting to play the game according our rules.
My wife works for a certain government department. Twice a week they have a pointless singalong complete with guitars - all at the taxpayer's expense.... I used to work for a large water and sewage company in the UK (it was removed from council/government purview over 30 years ago there). One of the engineers once told me that they could actually feed the outflow from waste water treatment plants directly into a water treatment plant but they never did it because of the way it looked.
what is happening with this co governance arrangment that the Whangnui council are proposing, are people aware of what is happening with this? That is a dangerous precident for the future of this country, tribal rule is toxic
In this country, all Pakeha benefit from white privilege, although not to same degree. On the whole, men tend to have more of it than women. Professional people tend to have more of it than manual or unemployed workers. But as a group, white privilege is something white folk all share. It is the privilege of getting to play the game according our rules.
We ALL have Treaties with the Crown which specifically enshrine Equal Rights, Advantages and Privileges for ALL subjects. The Crown was a "Treaty Partner" (to utilise woke terminology) with many other "Treaty Parties" well before Maori were added as English subjects in the Maori version of the 1840 Treaty of Waitangi. These Treaties include the 1215 Magna Carta, the 1267 Treaty of Montgomery (Wales), the 1706 Treaty of Union (Scotland) and the 1800 Treaty of Union (Ireland), and their respective enactments. In 1840 the "Crown" was already a "Partnership" with several "First Nations Partners" - ie. the Crown of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland.The Union Flag was specifically created by Article 1 of the 1706 Treaty of Union to represent the Union of "Treaty Parties". The 1840 Treaty of Waitangi was specifically signed over the Union Flag to represent this. This is like a going concern which has several existing partners, taking on another partner and absorbing their concern into a greater whole - with each partner being on an exactly equal footing. Article 1 of the 1707 Act of Union (Scotland) states;"That the two Kingdoms of Scotland and England, shall, upon the first Day of May next ensuing the Date hereof, and for ever after, be united into one Kingdom by the Name of Great-Britain, and that the Ensigns Armorial of the said united Kingdom, be such as her Majesty shall appoint; and the Crosses of St. Andrew and St. George be conjoined in such a manner as her Majesty shall think fit, and used in all Flags, Banners, Standards, and Ensigns, both at Sea and Land." Several Articles of these Treaties require that all citizens have equal rights, advantages and privileges and that no new party added should be given exclusive ones. For example, Article 4 of the 1707 Act of Union (Scotland) states;"That all the Subjects of the united Kingdom of Great-Britain shall, from and after the Union, have full Freedom and Intercourse of Trade and Navigation, to and from any Port or Place within the said united Kingdom, and the Dominions and Plantations thereunto belonging; and that there be a Communication of all other Rights, Privileges, and Advantages, which do or may belong to the Subjects of either Kingdom, except where it is otherwise expressly agreed in these Articles." Also for Example, Article 6 of the 1801 Act of Union (Ireland) states;"That it be the sixth article of union, that his Majesty’s subjects of Great Britain and Ireland shall, from and after the first day of January, one thousand eight hundred and one, be entitled to the same privileges, and be on the same footing as to encouragements and bounties on the like articles, being the growth, produce, or manufacture of either country respectively, and generally in respect of trade and navigation in all ports and places in the united kingdom and its dependencies; and that in all treaties made by his Majesty, his heirs, and successors, with any foreign power, his Majesty’s subjects of Ireland shall have same the privileges, and be on the same footing as his Majesty’s subjects of Great Britain." As above, these Treaties bound, and continue to bind, the Crown and all of its successors, such as the "Crown of New Zealand". Several legal precedents have been made dating back to at least the Union of the Crowns of England and Scotland in 1603 confirming that subjects under the Crown must be treated equally. This includes Calvin's Case (1608), 77 ER 377, (1608) Co Rep 1a, also known as the Case of the Postnati. The Crown cannot even begin to envision unequally restricting, or granting more, Rights, Advantages and Privileges of one or more "Treaty Parties" without being in breach of these Treaties. However, the Crown has increasingly been acting in breach of these Treaties and needs to immediately honour them. For example, Article 25 of the 1707 Act of Union (Scotland) states;"That all Laws and Statutes in either Kingdom, so far as they are contrary to, or inconsistent with the Terms of these Articles, or any of them, shall, from and after the Union, cease, and become void, and shall be so declared to be, by the respective Parliaments of the said Kingdoms." The pre and post 1840 "Treaty Parties" who have equal Rights, Advantages and Privileges within the Crown of New Zealand include English, Welsh, Scottish, Irish, Australian, Dutch, French, Moriori, Maori, and subjects of the Realm of New Zealand. The Crown has no doubt learnt its lesson when historically trying to breach the rights of some of these subjects. Rather than the "Treaty" situation being like two halves of an apple (ie the Crown and Maori), the real situation is like an orange, wherein each of the segments represent the numerous equal "Treaty Partners" and the protective and encapsulating skin represents the Crown. The only question is how much power the "Crown" has (ie. how thick is the skin of the orange) but each "First Nation" "Treaty Partner" segment is identical. New "communities" can be envisioned as the new growth segments between the original segments (as in an orange) but always within the protective skin of the "Crown" and its powers. In fact it is these earlier Treaties, and especially the 1706 Treaty of Union (Scotland) which specifically defines the "Crown" and who exactly reigns. If these earlier treaties are breached by the "Crown", tried to be ignored by "Treaty Deniers", or an attempt made to try and undermine or demote their relative importance by "Treaty Bigots", then the legitimacy of the current monarchs themselves would be jepordised (and the Monarch over the Water - ie the Stuart dynasty, would therefore need to be re-established). There can be no apartheid under these Treaties and the time has come to honour them equally.
In this country, all Pakeha benefit from white privilege, although not to same degree. On the whole, men tend to have more of it than women. Professional people tend to have more of it than manual or unemployed workers. But as a group, white privilege is something white folk all share. It is the privilege of getting to play the game according our rules.
Over the years, Wellingtons citizens are well used to disruptions while maintenance is carried out around the city. Any plans made by a series of elected officials to improve traffic flow or pedestrian access are not going to please some folks, and yet, could be the breath of life for others. What keeps councilors honest and prioritising essential work over their own pet vanity projects comes down to rate oayer participation: engagement in the process. Most of the complainers probably dont even take the time to vote in their local body elections. Go write letters, send emails, and make noise in their ears that, as citizens, you need to see change. But the only engagement of any note is to carry on like a bunch of butt hurt cry babies when a councerlor is sprung getting pissed -up in a bar.
Dig a shallow hole. Preferrably not too far away from crops. When people start getting sick then you move to another area and start over. It has been suggested that polluted crops may have caused their immigration to New Zealand. ACC now funds traditional "healthcare". Let that one sink in...
So, Michael doesn't' mind if you do things for cultural or religious reasons as long as they don't cost money, time, or efficiency. He talks about the outmoded cultural nonsense and spiritual gibberish. Kind of like not letting shops and businesses operate on Christmas day and Good Friday because it might upset the Christians and their belief in spiritual gibberish. I bet that costs more in money, time, and efficiency than what he's moaning about. Easier to have a crack at Māori, I guess.
In this country, all Pakeha benefit from white privilege, although not to same degree. On the whole, men tend to have more of it than women. Professional people tend to have more of it than manual or unemployed workers. But as a group, white privilege is something white folk all share. It is the privilege of getting to play the game according our rules.
Absolutely wright Michael Laws true
In this country, all Pakeha benefit from white privilege, although not to same degree. On the whole, men tend to have more of it than women.
Professional people tend to have more of it than manual or unemployed workers. But as a group,
white
privilege is something white folk all share. It is the privilege of getting to play the game according our rules.
My wife works for a certain government department. Twice a week they have a pointless singalong complete with guitars - all at the taxpayer's expense....
I used to work for a large water and sewage company in the UK (it was removed from council/government purview over 30 years ago there). One of the engineers once told me that they could actually feed the outflow from waste water treatment plants directly into a water treatment plant but they never did it because of the way it looked.
Please go on longer next time Micheal.
what is happening with this co governance arrangment that the Whangnui council are proposing, are people aware of what is happening with this? That is a dangerous precident for the future of this country, tribal rule is toxic
In this country, all Pakeha benefit from white privilege, although not to same degree. On the whole, men tend to have more of it than women.
Professional people tend to have more of it than manual or unemployed workers. But as a group,
white
privilege is something white folk all share. It is the privilege of getting to play the game according our rules.
Palmerston North wants to build a $500mil treating plant.
Where is common sense Michael Laws . Out the fucking gate 😅
Jeepers creepers people have lost the plot. Aspecially those in position of power.
😂
So what the hell was the council doing with it's rare money 💰💰💰?
Rate money 🤑
...rape!
water dumped on the land goes into the rivers anyway. Even worse is when it gets into people's drinking wells.
Pakeha love polluting our drinking water, the same dumb shit their ancestors did in England
Talk about SOUTHPAN!!
We ALL have Treaties with the Crown which specifically enshrine Equal Rights, Advantages and Privileges for ALL subjects.
The Crown was a "Treaty Partner" (to utilise woke terminology) with many other "Treaty Parties" well before Maori were added as English subjects in the Maori version of the 1840 Treaty of Waitangi.
These Treaties include the 1215 Magna Carta, the 1267 Treaty of Montgomery (Wales), the 1706 Treaty of Union (Scotland) and the 1800 Treaty of Union (Ireland), and their respective enactments.
In 1840 the "Crown" was already a "Partnership" with several "First Nations Partners" - ie. the Crown of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland.The Union Flag was specifically created by Article 1 of the 1706 Treaty of Union to represent the Union of "Treaty Parties". The 1840 Treaty of Waitangi was specifically signed over the Union Flag to represent this.
This is like a going concern which has several existing partners, taking on another partner and absorbing their concern into a greater whole - with each partner being on an exactly equal footing.
Article 1 of the 1707 Act of Union (Scotland) states;"That the two Kingdoms of Scotland and England, shall, upon the first Day of May next ensuing the Date hereof, and for ever after, be united into one Kingdom by the Name of Great-Britain, and that the Ensigns Armorial of the said united Kingdom, be such as her Majesty shall appoint; and the Crosses of St. Andrew and St. George be conjoined in such a manner as her Majesty shall think fit, and used in all Flags, Banners, Standards, and Ensigns, both at Sea and Land."
Several Articles of these Treaties require that all citizens have equal rights, advantages and privileges and that no new party added should be given exclusive ones. For example, Article 4 of the 1707 Act of Union (Scotland) states;"That all the Subjects of the united Kingdom of Great-Britain shall, from and after the Union, have full Freedom and Intercourse of Trade and Navigation, to and from any Port or Place within the said united Kingdom, and the Dominions and Plantations thereunto belonging; and that there be a Communication of all other Rights, Privileges, and Advantages, which do or may belong to the Subjects of either Kingdom, except where it is otherwise expressly agreed in these Articles."
Also for Example, Article 6 of the 1801 Act of Union (Ireland) states;"That it be the sixth article of union, that his Majesty’s subjects of Great Britain and Ireland shall, from and after the first day of January, one thousand eight hundred and one, be entitled to the same privileges, and be on the same footing as to encouragements and bounties on the like articles, being the growth, produce, or manufacture of either country respectively, and generally in respect of trade and navigation in all ports and places in the united kingdom and its dependencies; and that in all treaties made by his Majesty, his heirs, and successors, with any foreign power, his Majesty’s subjects of Ireland shall have same the privileges, and be on the same footing as his Majesty’s subjects of Great Britain."
As above, these Treaties bound, and continue to bind, the Crown and all of its successors, such as the "Crown of New Zealand". Several legal precedents have been made dating back to at least the Union of the Crowns of England and Scotland in 1603 confirming that subjects under the Crown must be treated equally. This includes Calvin's Case (1608), 77 ER 377, (1608) Co Rep 1a, also known as the Case of the Postnati.
The Crown cannot even begin to envision unequally restricting, or granting more, Rights, Advantages and Privileges of one or more "Treaty Parties" without being in breach of these Treaties. However, the Crown has increasingly been acting in breach of these Treaties and needs to immediately honour them.
For example, Article 25 of the 1707 Act of Union (Scotland) states;"That all Laws and Statutes in either Kingdom, so far as they are contrary to, or inconsistent with the Terms of these Articles, or any of them, shall, from and after the Union, cease, and become void, and shall be so declared to be, by the respective Parliaments of the said Kingdoms."
The pre and post 1840 "Treaty Parties" who have equal Rights, Advantages and Privileges within the Crown of New Zealand include English, Welsh, Scottish, Irish, Australian, Dutch, French, Moriori, Maori, and subjects of the Realm of New Zealand. The Crown has no doubt learnt its lesson when historically trying to breach the rights of some of these subjects.
Rather than the "Treaty" situation being like two halves of an apple (ie the Crown and Maori), the real situation is like an orange, wherein each of the segments represent the numerous equal "Treaty Partners" and the protective and encapsulating skin represents the Crown. The only question is how much power the "Crown" has (ie. how thick is the skin of the orange) but each "First Nation" "Treaty Partner" segment is identical.
New "communities" can be envisioned as the new growth segments between the original segments (as in an orange) but always within the protective skin of the "Crown" and its powers.
In fact it is these earlier Treaties, and especially the 1706 Treaty of Union (Scotland) which specifically defines the "Crown" and who exactly reigns. If these earlier treaties are breached by the "Crown", tried to be ignored by "Treaty Deniers", or an attempt made to try and undermine or demote their relative importance by "Treaty Bigots", then the legitimacy of the current monarchs themselves would be jepordised (and the Monarch over the Water - ie the Stuart dynasty, would therefore need to be re-established).
There can be no apartheid under these Treaties and the time has come to honour them equally.
In re Beddoe, let's see the crown provide evidence it is not acting in breach of trust.
In this country, all Pakeha benefit from white privilege, although not to same degree. On the whole, men tend to have more of it than women.
Professional people tend to have more of it than manual or unemployed workers. But as a group,
white
privilege is something white folk all share. It is the privilege of getting to play the game according our rules.
Over the years, Wellingtons citizens are well used to disruptions while maintenance is carried out around the city. Any plans made by a series of elected officials to improve traffic flow or pedestrian access are not going to please some folks, and yet, could be the breath of life for others. What keeps councilors honest and prioritising essential work over their own pet vanity projects comes down to rate oayer participation: engagement in the process. Most of the complainers probably dont even take the time to vote in their local body elections.
Go write letters, send emails, and make noise in their ears that, as citizens, you need to see change.
But the only engagement of any note is to carry on like a bunch of butt hurt cry babies when a councerlor is sprung getting pissed -up in a bar.
i wonder how pre-colonial M dealt with their sewage? probably the same as the meatworks?
Or road works two face Tauiwi.
Dig a shallow hole. Preferrably not too far away from crops. When people start getting sick then you move to another area and start over. It has been suggested that polluted crops may have caused their immigration to New Zealand. ACC now funds traditional "healthcare". Let that one sink in...
@kir0nz effing BS
@@TiaTaukamo Victim Support.- Sean O'Dwyer- 136- 140 Hobson street.- auckland 1010- new zealand.// maha aotearoa.''
Pakeha love polluting our drinking water, they been doing that since their ancestors were doing it in England lol
LEONARD PELTIER WAS HOME D'D
How do you keep people in fighting. You divide by race and say it's their rights. Wonder what Changes and costs to add toxic fluoride?
Congratulations Michael, you're a libertarian. The next step is anarchocapitalism. 😅 Hayek, Rand for reading.
He is simply making a sensible point.
@@garyc1384 Anarchocapitalism is the culmination of cogent ideology - if ideological. Hayek isn't. Just he ends up at the right outcome.
What is a moolree?
Islam.
So, Michael doesn't' mind if you do things for cultural or religious reasons as long as they don't cost money, time, or efficiency. He talks about the outmoded cultural nonsense and spiritual gibberish. Kind of like not letting shops and businesses operate on Christmas day and Good Friday because it might upset the Christians and their belief in spiritual gibberish. I bet that costs more in money, time, and efficiency than what he's moaning about. Easier to have a crack at Māori, I guess.
In this country, all Pakeha benefit from white privilege, although not to same degree. On the whole, men tend to have more of it than women.
Professional people tend to have more of it than manual or unemployed workers. But as a group,
white
privilege is something white folk all share. It is the privilege of getting to play the game according our rules.
wow there is some real racial hate going on here.