FF is doing great job joining spirituality with science! this what world need in coming days ! It will open the door to science in deep level experiment and experience are merged or will become one!
Fabulous! Two of my favs together 🥰 44-45:30 is 90 secs of illuminated brilliance 🤩! And I agree with the rest too. I imagine it’s very hard for him to communicate the download from his transcendent experience to the rest of us. Hard to put the ineffable into words, but he’s doing well! Please have on Doug Matzke (Deep Reality, bit physics) who has a theory that is uncannily close to this one. I heard him giving a talk with Bernard Carr (also one of my favs) and it was amazing! I would love to hear these two authors (Faggin and Matzke) discuss the similarities and differences between their theories as each came to such similar notions through different means. They probably would be very happy to find each other if they don’t already know each other!
Federico is getting better explaining what he knows to the rest of us. I am glad he modified free will as not being total and qualified it as a modicum of free will, these points are crucial as there are many sceptics. It must be the case Federico's theory will fall short in some ways nonetheless I truly believe he is near the mark. What would be a good idea is to have a questioner constructively challenge Federico so we can put the pieces together and Federico can see where his theory might need tweaking. My personal take on understanding Federico theory is that you have to work really hard initially to try to get the fundamental points and for that I use the podcast transcript which I edit out um, uh etc. Federico's theory (not forgetting Dariano) is a basic blueprint of how an underlying spiritual dimension runs kinda parallel to our experiences, though that phraseology would benefit from much qualification outside of a brief comment. All in all this podcast is the best to-date probably as Federico's ability to define has improved. Thanks guys.
Clearest way to explain what a quantum particle is that I have seen until now (for those who are not familar with quantum physics): electron is correlated to its quantum field the same a wave is correlated to the sea. That's why we sometimes see the electron as a particle (a wave itself, the physical mass of water reaching a peak and going down) and as a wave (the transmission of movement between those masses of water).
Fantastic! Conversation! I wonder though is Dr Fagin's use of the word ONE something of a barrier to understanding. Perhaps the word NOW is closer in English to the concept he is communicating because ONE implies quanta/particularity whereas NOW is more an expression of qualia/field. The questioner Raymond at 1:08:34 who aligned free will with creativity, I think, has the same intuition that I'm alluding to here. Effectively ONE implies a rational number (a then) where NOW is more like an irrational number (being). How many NOWs are there? Thank you!
The privacy of the inner experience in quantum terms seems to be between the observer and the observed... the particle/wave and the consciousness that winesses it at a given moment. Bit frustrating that 11 minutes in and Fredrico has not been asked to describe the experience or experiences that led to his awakening.
There are a lot of videos in youtube where Federico explains the experience he had. I'm grateful here they don't make him repeat the same thing over and over and used that time for different questions.
FF is doing great job joining spirituality with science! this what world need in coming days ! It will open the door to science in deep level experiment and experience are merged or will become one!
Fabulous! Two of my favs together 🥰
44-45:30 is 90 secs of illuminated brilliance 🤩! And I agree with the rest too. I imagine it’s very hard for him to communicate the download from his transcendent experience to the rest of us. Hard to put the ineffable into words, but he’s doing well!
Please have on Doug Matzke (Deep Reality, bit physics) who has a theory that is uncannily close to this one. I heard him giving a talk with Bernard Carr (also one of my favs) and it was amazing! I would love to hear these two authors (Faggin and Matzke) discuss the similarities and differences between their theories as each came to such similar notions through different means. They probably would be very happy to find each other if they don’t already know each other!
Thank you both very much for sharing your time and work Federico, and Alex, really enjoyed this conversation, peace
Federico is getting better explaining what he knows to the rest of us. I am glad he modified free will as not being total and qualified it as a modicum of free will, these points are crucial as there are many sceptics. It must be the case Federico's theory will fall short in some ways nonetheless I truly believe he is near the mark. What would be a good idea is to have a questioner constructively challenge Federico so we can put the pieces together and Federico can see where his theory might need tweaking. My personal take on understanding Federico theory is that you have to work really hard initially to try to get the fundamental points and for that I use the podcast transcript which I edit out um, uh etc. Federico's theory (not forgetting Dariano) is a basic blueprint of how an underlying spiritual dimension runs kinda parallel to our experiences, though that phraseology would benefit from much qualification outside of a brief comment. All in all this podcast is the best to-date probably as Federico's ability to define has improved. Thanks guys.
Thank you for sharing. Cheers
Federico, the ball is in the field of play. 🌎🕺🏼Chow!
Thank you so much !
Clearest way to explain what a quantum particle is that I have seen until now (for those who are not familar with quantum physics): electron is correlated to its quantum field the same a wave is correlated to the sea. That's why we sometimes see the electron as a particle (a wave itself, the physical mass of water reaching a peak and going down) and as a wave (the transmission of movement between those masses of water).
Fantastic! Conversation! I wonder though is Dr Fagin's use of the word ONE something of a barrier to understanding. Perhaps the word NOW is closer in English to the concept he is communicating because ONE implies quanta/particularity whereas NOW is more an expression of qualia/field. The questioner Raymond at 1:08:34 who aligned free will with creativity, I think, has the same intuition that I'm alluding to here. Effectively ONE implies a rational number (a then) where NOW is more like an irrational number (being). How many NOWs are there? Thank you!
Now is Won 🎉
Congratiulation 😂
Fabulous interview, I'm confused about proton field because proton is not fundamental as it consists of three quarks
The privacy of the inner experience in quantum terms seems to be between the observer and the observed... the particle/wave and the consciousness that winesses it at a given moment. Bit frustrating that 11 minutes in and Fredrico has not been asked to describe the experience or experiences that led to his awakening.
What have yours been like?
There are a lot of videos in youtube where Federico explains the experience he had. I'm grateful here they don't make him repeat the same thing over and over and used that time for different questions.
Wish this were in Spanish 🎉😊
This is Rupert Sheldrake’s work on consciousness as being present in a fields. .
is it possible for you guys to do research on 'time-telling'ability of a bangladeshi man without watching a watch?
Smile
Неужели эти ребята всерьёз говорят о том, что отсутствие у них счастья заставило их поверить в идеализм и первичности сознания?