วีดีโอ

FF is doing great job joining spirituality with science! this what world need in coming days ! It will open the door to science in deep level experiment and experience are merged or will become one!

Physics uses abstraction to explain literally everything... so what is their problem? I guess the fact that conciousness and time are both non physical

Martinez Cynthia Anderson Jennifer Garcia Paul

Williams Michael Jones Carol Taylor Elizabeth

Young Jennifer Davis Mary Young Steven

Gonzalez Amy Gonzalez Michael Brown Shirley

Clark Michael Anderson George Williams George

Martinez Sarah Perez Deborah Allen Kenneth

Ultimate juice

Federico, the ball is in the field of play. 🌎🕺🏼Chow!

Jones Patricia Allen Susan Thomas Timothy

Hall Helen Davis Jason Hernandez Anthony

Thomas Dorothy Harris Joseph Williams Sandra

Jackson Joseph Johnson Steven Brown Donna

Thomas Michael Jones Sharon Taylor Richard

Anyone know where to find the refutation of the science board?

Jones Laura Davis Kimberly Jones Steven

I think the joy is not in “figuring “ it out but in the search. The observation. Thank you both!

Have you ever heard about "Mushi"? I found them in a Japanese manga, Mushi-shi, a very beautiful one, indeed. They are neither plants nor animals. They differ from other forms of life such as the micro-organisms and the fungi. Instead, they resemble the primaeval body of life and are generally known as "Mushi". Their existence and appearance are unknown to many and only a limited number of humans are aware of them. Ginko is a "Mushi-shi" who travels around to investigate and find out more about the "Mushi". In the process, he also lends a helping hand to people who face problems with supernatural occurrences which may be related to the "Mushi".

This is excellent, especially tapping into Martin Buber. I'm also using Buber from different perspective in a book I'm writing. Btw Edward Carpenter warned us of this back when unnecessary suffering was imposed in the past.

Fabulous discussion. What a wonderful thoughtful person. Need to interview/find people who are taking this kind of humane approach to mental health institutions and facilities for the elderly.

Fascinating topic for exploration and contemplation. Superlative dialogue. Gracias. 🙏

❤

The world needs to thank Mauro for being honest about everything! Yes I love "Jesus" but we need to understand the past to make a difference. I believe Jesus was called the word because he understood the meaning of Elohim and stood up against the lies of the "Jews"... For now that's all we can take as truth. The truth will set you free from slavery.

Super interesting guest and discussion.

Edward Witten, one of the brightest mathematicians said consciousness will ever remain a mystery. I myself heard a great saint saying : „A dual mind is half blind.“ So I think science we will only solve the easy problems….. Thxs and best regards from Vienna.

Great conversation!

Fabulous interview, I'm confused about proton field because proton is not fundamental as it consists of three quarks

This was so great to listen to! Thank you both so much and God bless 🕊

is it possible for you guys to do research on 'time-telling'ability of a bangladeshi man without watching a watch?

I believe more in Mr. Hancock than anyone. Archaeologists are so stuck in the dark ages. Obviously we have a much richer history than what they believe and I love to hear of Mr. Hancock’s research! He’s opening a whole new past for mankind. Thank you so much Mr. Hancock!😅

I'd argue that it's "what" you are that doesn't change, & "who" you are is entirely irrelevant. In other words Its NOT a matter of "my" sentience, its that sentience itself is thE ontic primitive/what nature is.

Always inspiring to listen to Patrick Harpur. His book are daimonic masterpieces!

What a wonderful woman ❤. Love this way of thinking.. how privileged to be able to listen to quality discussion on these important issues.

If the biological father was an Elohim, then Jesus was a true revolutionary. In my opinion, his true relevance is then far greater than that in the religious story that Christians believe.

Fabulous! Two of my favs together 🥰 44-45:30 is 90 secs of illuminated brilliance 🤩! And I agree with the rest too. I imagine it’s very hard for him to communicate the download from his transcendent experience to the rest of us. Hard to put the ineffable into words, but he’s doing well! Please have on Doug Matzke (Deep Reality, bit physics) who has a theory that is uncannily close to this one. I heard him giving a talk with Bernard Carr (also one of my favs) and it was amazing! I would love to hear these two authors (Faggin and Matzke) discuss the similarities and differences between their theories as each came to such similar notions through different means. They probably would be very happy to find each other if they don’t already know each other!

I respectfully diasagree with alex: & taxpayer paid scientists... This kind of scientist, which is everywhere - is brutal in its quest to dismiss all opposition. Multitude, as the good dr Shiva says, is the melting pot of the forward movement of the whole complexity of moving, living life... And what is more evolution itself is complex and not stictly linear. .

This is Rupert Sheldrake’s work on consciousness as being present in a fields. .

Federico is getting better explaining what he knows to the rest of us. I am glad he modified free will as not being total and qualified it as a modicum of free will, these points are crucial as there are many sceptics. It must be the case Federico's theory will fall short in some ways nonetheless I truly believe he is near the mark. What would be a good idea is to have a questioner constructively challenge Federico so we can put the pieces together and Federico can see where his theory might need tweaking. My personal take on understanding Federico theory is that you have to work really hard initially to try to get the fundamental points and for that I use the podcast transcript which I edit out um, uh etc. Federico's theory (not forgetting Dariano) is a basic blueprint of how an underlying spiritual dimension runs kinda parallel to our experiences, though that phraseology would benefit from much qualification outside of a brief comment. All in all this podcast is the best to-date probably as Federico's ability to define has improved. Thanks guys.

Thank you both very much for sharing your time and work Federico, and Alex, really enjoyed this conversation, peace

Patrick Harpur is an unrecognised genius.

Get into dzogchen Look for Keith Dowman

Faggin rocks 💪

The privacy of the inner experience in quantum terms seems to be between the observer and the observed... the particle/wave and the consciousness that winesses it at a given moment. Bit frustrating that 11 minutes in and Fredrico has not been asked to describe the experience or experiences that led to his awakening.

Thank you for sharing. Cheers

Clearest way to explain what a quantum particle is that I have seen until now (for those who are not familar with quantum physics): electron is correlated to its quantum field the same a wave is correlated to the sea. That's why we sometimes see the electron as a particle (a wave itself, the physical mass of water reaching a peak and going down) and as a wave (the transmission of movement between those masses of water).

37:00 Brilliant. And the robot (the body with its brain) thinks that he is the most sophisticated form of existence. You see that this phenomenon by which we tend to think (totally wrongly) that we are the climax of creation is the same fear we project against AI, believing that, in the future, robots will have that same tendency and destroy us. It's the same that we have been trying to do (in vain because it's impossible) with global consciousness (God or whatever u want to call it): destroy it.

Fantastic! Conversation! I wonder though is Dr Fagin's use of the word ONE something of a barrier to understanding. Perhaps the word NOW is closer in English to the concept he is communicating because ONE implies quanta/particularity whereas NOW is more an expression of qualia/field. The questioner Raymond at 1:08:34 who aligned free will with creativity, I think, has the same intuition that I'm alluding to here. Effectively ONE implies a rational number (a then) where NOW is more like an irrational number (being). How many NOWs are there? Thank you!

Неужели эти ребята всерьёз говорят о том, что отсутствие у них счастья заставило их поверить в идеализм и первичности сознания?

Thank you so much !