Rethinking Biology: A Conversation With Michael Levin

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 16 เม.ย. 2024
  • Think you know how biology works? Think again! A conversation between pioneering biologist Michael Levin, and Future of Being Human initiative Director Andrew Maynard. Audio available at futureofbeingh...
    WANT TO KNOW MORE?
    The Levin Lab: www.drmichaell...
    Forms of life, forms of mind: thoughtforms.l...
    Michael Levin on X (Twitter): / drmichaellevin
    MICHAEL LEVIN
    Michael Levin is the Vannevar Bush Distinguished Professor of Biology at Tufts University, and associate faculty at Harvard’s Wyss Institute. He serves as the director of the Allen Discovery Center at Tufts and the co-director of the Institute for Computationally Designed Organisms at Tufts/UVM.
    His lab has pioneered approaches to organ regeneration, cancer reprogramming, non-genetic modification of the bodyplan, and the engineering of novel living proto-organisms. Using tools from behavioral and computer science, Dr. Levin seeks to understand the collective intelligence of cells and harness their problem-solving capacities for applications in birth defects, regeneration, cancer, and synthetic bioengineering.
    X: / drmichaellevin
    ANDREW MAYNARD
    Andrew Maynard is a scientist, author, Professor of Advanced Technology Transitions, and founder of Arizona State University’s Future of Being Human community. He studies the future and how our actions influence it.
    Substack: futureofbeingh...
    X: / 2020science
    ABOUT THE FUTURE OF BEING HUMAN ... UNPLUGGED
    The Future of Being Human … Unplugged is a series of live streamed conversations that bring together experts and thinkers from very different backgrounds as they explore some of the more intriguing, complex, and profound implications of rapidly developing technological capabilities.
    Unscripted, unpredictable, and threaded through with mischievously curiosity, Unplugged aims to push the bounds of how we think about the intersection between advanced technologies, cutting edge science, and the very essence of what it might mean to be human in the future.
    And the “Unplugged” bit? We’re unplugging from the usual norms and expectations that so often make online discussions deadly tedious, so no interminable PowerPoint presentations, no long winded opening statements, and no impenetrable monologues - just compelling conversation that’ll make you think.
    We’re also unplugging from conventional ideas and often-stifling disciplinary constraints as we explore futures that are anything but conventional.
    In other words, expect conversations that engage, entertain, and shake up your world as we explore what it might mean to be human in a technologically complex future!
    Website: futureofbeingh...
  • วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี

ความคิดเห็น • 96

  • @2cleverxhalf
    @2cleverxhalf 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +30

    The fact that we, (the layman), are able to get this level of information from the very people at the cutting edge of research into all these fields of genetics, biology, neurology, consciousness, AI, the physics of various fields is just amazing, and is something never seen before. These new ideas are entering into the lay consciousness where it compels us to believe that we, (society), ARE at the cusp of a very new era of information dissemination.

    • @canilernproto3018
      @canilernproto3018 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I love the way you put that! I'm so excites and so grateful honestly. There are a lot of bad and dangerous things about this dynastic capitalist trend but the proliferation of quality information is a major boon for those who are so inclined. Love you!

  • @DG123z
    @DG123z 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    Kids of the future talking about us.. "they were stuck in the same body their whole lives??? 😳"

  • @elizabethwinsor-strumpetqueen
    @elizabethwinsor-strumpetqueen 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    I work as a cleaner in a supermarket - to be able to hear this cutting edge thinking at the forefront of science is what is the most wonderful thing!
    I see through a glass darkly at what is in store for my children's futures ...unless the childish psychopaths that own don't kill us all first !! 😂

    • @FutureOfBeingHuman
      @FutureOfBeingHuman  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Just had to say thank you for this comment! Allowing anyone to be a part of thinking about the future is incredibly important, and something we strive to do in the Future of Being Human initiative!

  • @flflflflflfl
    @flflflflflfl 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    20:00 "You don't get out your soldering iron when it's time to switch from Photoshop to Microsoft Word" lmao

  • @Renvoxan
    @Renvoxan 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    Holy moly, the whole conversations was great and refreshing compared to the usual questions to Dr. Levin, but the ending and his vision of the future killed it! Let's f gooo!

  • @johnc5893
    @johnc5893 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    I have been following Mike for a while now, and this was a fantastic interview. For what it's worth, I feel that same sense of the unfreezing of scientific dogma and the growing understanding of our limited perception. I believe the falling away of hubris will open the door to a new scientific renaissance.
    I am actually just about to release a book on "The future of being human" (not the title) that incorporates some of Mike's ideas on a practical level.

    • @LowenKM
      @LowenKM 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      'Fer sure, and considering that Francis Crick won a Nobel for his work discovering DNA, I still can't understand how Levin doesn't receive more mainstream attention for his discoveries that are _at least_ as valuable and revolutionary?! Or perhaps as Andrew points out, we're indeed beginning to see a 'Renaissance of challenges to established notions of how the world works'... with the true 'multi-disciplinary' folks like Mike, _leading the charge_ against the 'established' notions.

    • @johnmacbride900
      @johnmacbride900 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Which of Levin's ideas were you looking to incorporate? I've seen nearly all of his presentations and I also think his ideas have broad implications.

    • @johnc5893
      @johnc5893 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@johnmacbride900 His idea of connections and communication at various levels of the organism and how they communicate. As one example, from a cellular point of view, 97% of people are deficient in potassium. Why does this matter so much? We produce our body weight in ATP every day, and about 50% of that is used to power Na/K pumps. I believe that getting that right is so important when we talk about ion channels and electrical potentials. It is so simple and inexpensive to fix. In the first part, I am exploring getting the basics right. Optimizing the system, if you will. The second aspect is looking at different health interventions and what they mean from a connectivity point of view. For instance, how the hormetic stress of a cold shower causes vasoconstriction in the skin while vasodilation occurs in the organs. I explore how communication across all the various systems must be initiated and coordinated. Using this lens helps us understand how to use these types of things to keep the cells engaged as a collective. Oh, and btw, I will cite him directly and give my opinion that he will be a Nobel prize winner...lol

    • @williamjmccartan8879
      @williamjmccartan8879 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I wish you luck with the book and having Mike's work being an aspect of your book will bring more to the conversation. As John above here has mentioned I have also been following Dr. Levin for more than a couple of years, and included many of his conversational in a library I've been building for my grandkids so that can get an idea of what Papa thought was interesting, if you'd like a link reach out, peace

    • @ComsiCaterpillar
      @ComsiCaterpillar 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The dogmatic never leave academia, they teach but they NEVER discovery things. innovators don't have beliefs ... just unanswered questions.

  • @igneous4449
    @igneous4449 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Great conversation and questions. So grateful that Michael does all of these talks

  • @bluesque9687
    @bluesque9687 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +30

    I see the name Michael Levin abd i click. I write this within a few seconds of clicking... hoping it will be good...

    • @bluesque9687
      @bluesque9687 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      ...And it is awesome!! Two terrifically smart scientists having a very incisive discussion. Lots to learn!

    • @Renvoxan
      @Renvoxan 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Dr. Levin is the GOAT 🐐💯💯

    • @shinkurt
      @shinkurt 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Same lol

    • @Jim-if1vx
      @Jim-if1vx 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Look
      ​@@Renvoxan

    • @DaveWasThereMan
      @DaveWasThereMan หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      There's an annoying brit boi with the hive mind clone voice you had to get through

  • @zaggedout
    @zaggedout 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Wish this was longer

  • @williamjmccartan8879
    @williamjmccartan8879 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Thank you both very much for sharing your time and work, Michael, and Andrew, peace

  • @tslug
    @tslug 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Fantastic talk. Thank you so much!

  • @bradsillasen1972
    @bradsillasen1972 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Absolutely enthralling interview. Mind blowing stuff!

  • @tarynoneillDirector
    @tarynoneillDirector 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Fantastic episode, Andrew! I definitely have to listen to that again - so much to process!

  • @BR-hi6yt
    @BR-hi6yt 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I think micro-tubules is doing the thinking, it's a quantum effect. A recent paper on this backs-up Penrose's hypothesis to some extent.

  • @-handala-
    @-handala- หลายเดือนก่อน

    Always a treat listening to Michael Levin.

  • @lars227
    @lars227 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    someone should stage a talk between Levin and Rupert Sheldrake if they haven't already - this is in part an experimental validation of what Sheldrake has been saying (and been lambasted for) for a long time...

    • @thomassoliton1482
      @thomassoliton1482 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Sheldrake is not a scientist. He denies the role of DNA in biological development despite overwhelming evidence, and claims “morphic resonance” is the true principle underlying why ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny despite no evidence. See Karl Friston and the Free Energy Principle which explains much of the foundation of evolution, motivation, and consciousness.

    • @lordofnines2167
      @lordofnines2167 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Could you give me a video to learn about sheldrake? I’m unfamiliar with him and what you’re referencing.

    • @lars227
      @lars227 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@lordofnines2167 Sure, you'll find a lot of interesting conversations on a variety of topics in Rupert Sheldrake's channel. But, what he's most known for is morphic resonance, I guess; here's an up-to-date exposition of the main ideas: th-cam.com/video/MC6ljzgRVfY/w-d-xo.html

  • @LoisSharbel
    @LoisSharbel 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Mind boggling!!! I saw Michael Levin's name and clicked your site. What a fascinating conversation! Trying to digest all this information requires superhuman effort, with my limited
    knowledge and background. THANK YOU!!!!! I'll be working on understanding some of this for the rest of the day (skipping the hours of dinner out with friends because they would undoubtedly commit me if I bring this up). I'll watch again tomorrow to help. So happy to find your site!

  • @thechainsawlife3121
    @thechainsawlife3121 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Another amazing talk from Levin!

  • @IanBeck-yi5xe
    @IanBeck-yi5xe 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Great interview. Even more respect for ML with his Sideshow Bob chair cover.

  • @robinmoseby5355
    @robinmoseby5355 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks ~ a great conversation

  • @nda4591
    @nda4591 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Fascinating conversation!

  • @punkypinko2965
    @punkypinko2965 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Fascinating.

  • @greg1mcintosh844
    @greg1mcintosh844 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Rupert sheldrake was already all over this decades ago. I'm only a couple minutes into this. I hope they give him credit. This is still ultimately seemingly from what I can tell from the flavor of this, ultimately reductionistic and mechanistic, even if it is bioelectric. It misses something rudimentary in transcendent.oink.oink 🐖🐖🐷🐖

    • @monky_dust
      @monky_dust 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Yes he was. And no, they will never give him credit. Levin talks about memory definitely being stored in the brain, but "we have no evidence". This is no scientist. I don't trust him.

  • @spectatorlogic9218
    @spectatorlogic9218 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you for this great interview! Your questions are very spot on for someone like me that does not have a background in biology.

  • @vinceofyork
    @vinceofyork 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    If we are going to say that memory is partially stored in a tail, then can we also reverse engineer the study, and see if partial memory is lost when we only remove the tails to prove this claim?

  • @leighneal8989
    @leighneal8989 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Great interview with good questions. Let’s say the unsayable. Neodarwinism RIP. Cognition in cells and organs able to transmit complex morphological information. Bring back Lamarck.

  • @ComsiCaterpillar
    @ComsiCaterpillar 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    23:43 Even the electron has intelligence. Never understand people not seeing the electron a sentient.

  • @user-zh9sq2zk3v
    @user-zh9sq2zk3v หลายเดือนก่อน

    Information in The Light Eaters, about plant communications, (Sci Fri recently), blew my mind, as does the information in this interview. Interested in everything you're doing.

  • @MrTubacle
    @MrTubacle 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Characteristics of the child mentioned in my previously mentioned comment with accompanying video.
    Mirai Hoshino was born with disease and disability which no doctor can name.
    By modern medical, he is diagnosed with nothing unusual.
    But you can see….
    Deformity in skull and face.
    Eyelids are all lost.(He can’t blink)
    Microtiaーsmall ears and positioned in the wrong place.
    The bone of forehead is lost(Under skin, there is brain-His brain is not protected by born)
    Eye bone is lost.
    Cheek bone is lost.
    Also he is a child with medical care-Gastrostomy, Ventilator,Tracheostomy-

    • @glenliesegang233
      @glenliesegang233 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I am puzzled how random processes can encode both digitally ( proteins) and logic gates with feedback, such complex biological behavior.
      Seems "self-correcting goal oriented randomness" is required.

  • @SB324
    @SB324 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Yes thank you Dr. Levin for pointing out that our current situation is unacceptable.

  • @markwrede8878
    @markwrede8878 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    if life is a consistent phenomenon within the cosmos, biology must be a consistent potential within physics.

    • @nathanrobbins7668
      @nathanrobbins7668 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      And it’s not

    • @markwrede8878
      @markwrede8878 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@nathanrobbins7668 It's magic.

    • @nathanrobbins7668
      @nathanrobbins7668 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@markwrede8878 huh

    • @francescaerreia8859
      @francescaerreia8859 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Even if it’s just a one-off, with life only existing on earth, it has to be a consistent potential within physics. Same with consciousness. And since magic isn’t real or even a coherent concept, that’s certainly the case. Life is perfectly natural.

    • @nathanrobbins7668
      @nathanrobbins7668 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@francescaerreia8859 that IS a presupposition tho, you realize that don’t you? You have no basis for saying that, you just assume there has to be a naturalistic explanation for everything.
      That being said, I don’t disagree that it’s impossible within physics. However, I do KNOW (based on experimental data) that it is extremely unlikely.. like borderline impossible

  • @priyakulkarni9583
    @priyakulkarni9583 20 วันที่ผ่านมา

    It should be called as “chemical bioelectricity” how does this sodium potassium calcium chloride gradient produces/causes electricity? Do they exchange electrons?

  • @alikims
    @alikims 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    what things bubble sorting can do that are not in the algorithm?

  • @andresnicolasakevadavila4754
    @andresnicolasakevadavila4754 18 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Buenos días

  • @SciD1
    @SciD1 6 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Imagine what humanity may uncover in the future! Too bad it might not even survive this century.

  • @debyton
    @debyton 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    You are seeking the Universal Mobility of Individuality (UMI) principle. Read and keep reading; {LIVE Science; Forums, History and Culture; Culture History & Science; What is a living individual and is it naturally universally mobile?}

  • @anandaurora
    @anandaurora 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Just a crazy idea.. As is AGI, could there be somehow a NGI? (natural general intelligence)

    • @mnrvaprjct
      @mnrvaprjct 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      that’s what humans & all other animals are *face palm*

  • @paulflute
    @paulflute 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    first question.. morphic resonance..?

  • @carolspencer6915
    @carolspencer6915 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    💜

  • @blueresonantmonkey3188
    @blueresonantmonkey3188 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Will this fix subcutaneous tissue removed from a pilonidal cyst surgery 😢😢😢😢😢😢

  • @titussteenhuisen8864
    @titussteenhuisen8864 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Michael finished with minds changing bodies. In the form of reincarnation I think all life is build on that, In the form of possession overriding one mind with another it is very disturbing - psychopathic, something that should not happen.

  • @julianholman7379
    @julianholman7379 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    none say what this stress between state and target representation *is* (concretely) - this whole field seems to be mostly 'hand waving'

  • @thomaslizon2594
    @thomaslizon2594 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    As unplugged as those mic and headset!! ;)

  • @bobdalton2062
    @bobdalton2062 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    All this happens without any designer 😂😂😂
    I took a rubber band the other day chopped it up and lo and behold it became four tires and then they assembled themselves with an axle ( some scrap metal was laying around ) next thing I knew I had a miniature toy car and then tit started growing and growing new parts and getting bigger! now I have a brand new thing I am calling an automobile that I can drive around with! And it knows where I want to go with I don't have to do a thing!!. Amazing what can be done without any design on my part! That's what Darwin is are trying to sell us.

    • @fisheresque
      @fisheresque 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I don’t see either of these guys making that claim. It is fine to propose an invisible grand designer responsible for all this, but where is the evidence? Our minds inability to conceive how it could be otherwise, is not proof of anything. Science has not proven or disproven a creator, but neither has religion or atheism. Ironically, the ones who most believe they possess the truth are the farthest from it.

  • @DG123z
    @DG123z 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I wonder if he relates spherical harmonics to embryogenesis

  • @andresnicolasakevadavila4754
    @andresnicolasakevadavila4754 18 วันที่ผ่านมา

    😅🎉🎉🎉😢❤😮😊

  • @ishyandmikkischannel8811
    @ishyandmikkischannel8811 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Dawkins very upset....

  • @markanderson7236
    @markanderson7236 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Videos like these are not suited for people with ADHD.

  • @bobdalton2062
    @bobdalton2062 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Agents? In chemicals? Intelligence? Story of scaling? Get your goals met? Mystical magic BS. PS my car has self assembled and suddenly decided to start reproducing itself, I presume so it can meet its goals, so I can give cars to everyone in the world now.
    This guy is One of the best BSers since my professor Carl Sagan. My car emergent agency 34:04 has human level intelligence just as Levine said "problem-solving intelligence" 😂😂😂

    • @jared10203
      @jared10203 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What’s profession? You seem to understand very little about biology.

  • @ALavin-en1kr
    @ALavin-en1kr 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    All of this is supposed to be random without intelligence? It wouldn’t make sense.

  • @Abc-rx6tj
    @Abc-rx6tj 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    No time stamps thats just lazy imo

  • @timothytendick1550
    @timothytendick1550 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    How barbaric to leave you're offspring at the mercy of a genetic shuffle.... quoted from the future

  • @IanBeck-yi5xe
    @IanBeck-yi5xe 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great interview. Even more respect for
    ML with his Sideshow Bob chair cover.