Ep.2 Exploring the impossibility of the contrary in the History of Philosophy: Christ or Absurdity

Continuing to develop the theme of my last video: “Christ or absurdity”
Consider the implications of this question: Is advocating for tolerance inherently intolerant? If you accept some intolerance, what are you reasoning in terms of to allow for that?
In this video, I aim to set up how everyone is a philosopher because everyone must assume a certain worldview to answer basic questions.
I also explore how world and life views impact the way we define reality, what constitutes knowledge and morality, and that this means, by nature, they cannot be neutral.
So, everyone has a worldview, and they cannot be neutral, but are they all coherent and valid?