Hegel

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 4 มิ.ย. 2024
  • The second in my series of lectures on great German thinkers explores the life, work and influence of Hegel. Presented by Wesley Cecil PhD at Peninsula College

ความคิดเห็น • 81

  • @LetsFindOut1
    @LetsFindOut1 4 ปีที่แล้ว +50

    Thanks so much for all your lectures. I appreciate your accessible style. Its casual, practical, and still dense with ideas. Almost reminiscent of will durant.

  • @ancapistan
    @ancapistan 4 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    quote is by foucault and is as follows:
    “[T]ruly to escape Hegel involves an exact appreciation of the price we have to pay to detach ourselves from him. It assumes that we are aware of the extent to which Hegel, insidiously perhaps, is close to us; it implies a knowledge, in that which permits us to think against Hegel, of that which remains Hegelian. We have to determine the extent to which our anti-Hegelianism is possibly one of his tricks directed against us, at the end of which he stands, motionless, waiting for us.”

    • @lowrydan111
      @lowrydan111 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Foucault what a poor excuse for a teacher

    • @bihone4750
      @bihone4750 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@lowrydan111 what makes ya say that

    • @Goethe-von-Voltaire
      @Goethe-von-Voltaire ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I didn't know Foucault was that legit! Well, now I know.

    • @anhumblemessengerofthelawo3858
      @anhumblemessengerofthelawo3858 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thank you, you are a gentleman and a scholar

    • @anhumblemessengerofthelawo3858
      @anhumblemessengerofthelawo3858 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@Goethe-von-Voltaire
      He is the most cited thinker -- by far -- of the 20th century.

  • @ItsCronk
    @ItsCronk 4 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    The absolute madman just published it

    • @frederick3467
      @frederick3467 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Haha, I agree with you but we can't say it out loud.

  • @ljwljw21
    @ljwljw21 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I really like Wes's introduction of thinkers' childhood, educational and general social background for their philosophical developments. Really put in new perspectives to understand their thinkings that are rarely seen in streamlined academic texts. Great Job!

  • @J.A.Seyforth
    @J.A.Seyforth 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Fantastic biography of his life and relation to his thought, really well structured

  • @okra7648
    @okra7648 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Great lecture, also l really like that you didn't mention thesis anti-thesis synthesis.
    Edit: haha you mentioned it at the end only to dismiss it. Good on ya! And l believe it came from Fichte.

  • @christopherhamilton3621
    @christopherhamilton3621 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Another reason you want to go back and punch Kant! LOL. There are enough reasons already but this IS a good one…

  • @rafaelmonteirorodrigues4672
    @rafaelmonteirorodrigues4672 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I've been wanting to see your take on Hegel for years. Can Foucault perhaps happen in the near future? Thanks a lot, professor!

    • @lowrydan111
      @lowrydan111 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Please not foucault. Not worth study

  • @neamtz
    @neamtz 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I was wondering when you would get to Hegel!

  • @ascendrio
    @ascendrio หลายเดือนก่อน

    Now relevant more than ever.

  • @alan2here
    @alan2here 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thank you Hegel :)

  • @vygotsky17
    @vygotsky17 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Dear Wes. I enjoy your lectures and I refer my students to you. Excited to hear you're doing Schopenhauer. I wonder if you have any plans to cover Lacan?

  • @dialecticalveganegoist1721
    @dialecticalveganegoist1721 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Interesting lecture!

  • @Dayglodaydreams
    @Dayglodaydreams 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I love his individualism.

  • @mrinalnandi3988
    @mrinalnandi3988 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    THE MADLAD DID IT

  • @thespiritofhegel3487
    @thespiritofhegel3487 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Excellent stuff.

  • @pawegraczyk6050
    @pawegraczyk6050 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks.

  • @Noah-xg9ld
    @Noah-xg9ld 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    THE ABSOLUTE MADMAN

  • @thomassimmons1950
    @thomassimmons1950 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good stuff 👍!

  • @coldestlobstar5005
    @coldestlobstar5005 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    He calls it spirit because that's how you understand it

  • @scottybee33
    @scottybee33 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very curious to know what H thought of American Independence...???

    • @emmanueloluga9770
      @emmanueloluga9770 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      He approved the aspect of it that asserted and upheld human freedom and actualization

  • @aurora3655
    @aurora3655 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Ohhh la la! Girl! Hegel is cool! Viva la Evolution!

  • @sgeddegs9517
    @sgeddegs9517 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    In your future lectures, will you talk about Marx and Nietzsche again?

  • @pinosantilli8297
    @pinosantilli8297 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    One thing I think that drives many people away from philosophy is the difficult writing so to purposely make your writing difficult is a big mistake in philosophy. Was it Einstein that said, "as simple as possible but no simpler". Of course that doesn't mean that it will be simple...

  • @Dayglodaydreams
    @Dayglodaydreams 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    It seems like there is room for individual triumph of the will, like modern totalitarianism in Hegel's ideas. Maybe I am wrong.

    • @divinuminfernum
      @divinuminfernum ปีที่แล้ว

      well i dont think it mattered too much to hegel who would be running society but just that it was allowing for people to freely develop themselves within its structure - totalitarianism imposes alot of restrictions on what people can do within the structure, which seems tobe just what hegel disagreed with about the prussian state, so i dont see a direct line from hegel to totalitarianism at all, and probably less so than say the work of Nietzsche who people also misunderstood.

  • @michaelwoodsmccausland5633
    @michaelwoodsmccausland5633 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The. Benevolent Leviathans-is accurate

  • @michaelwoodsmccausland5633
    @michaelwoodsmccausland5633 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The Nobility went no where but underground

  • @Dayglodaydreams
    @Dayglodaydreams 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    god he is heady.

  • @AndersonDdrums
    @AndersonDdrums 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    39:10

  • @Dayglodaydreams
    @Dayglodaydreams 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    If I took this instead of 17th and 18th century I might still be a phil. major.

  • @Dayglodaydreams
    @Dayglodaydreams 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You can see how Hegel's phil. of history influenced Marx.

    • @bihone4750
      @bihone4750 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hegel influenced Marx in sooo many different ways. It's very interesting to have knowledge abt Marx, then going back to read Hegel. You can see so much of how Hegel influenced Marx more than virtually any other thinker!

  • @rifleattheplayground
    @rifleattheplayground 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    21:13 this is very similar to nondual concept of consciousness. Hindu, Buddhism, stoicism, GI Gurdjieff.

  • @michaelwoodsmccausland5633
    @michaelwoodsmccausland5633 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Inherited Power

  • @danchiappe
    @danchiappe 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Liberty biberty

  • @michaelwoodsmccausland5633
    @michaelwoodsmccausland5633 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    28k views and 6OO responses does not add up

  • @adaptercrash
    @adaptercrash ปีที่แล้ว

    Isolate world

  • @TheBraunzone
    @TheBraunzone 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Understand, "Ourselves," means Europeans and not Africans. I hope that in the future Mr. Cecil will not speak in a manner that distorts the actual racism of the text. I enjoy this information very much.

  • @socratesestmaxime
    @socratesestmaxime 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Dear Wes, why do you doubt Kants claim to be religious, in the metaphysics of morality he says to be religious is a duty of man against himself. That’s quite a statement to my mind. Same goes for Hegel, he loved the trinity because it is the symbolic representation that the spirit is dynamic. His philosophy of history is drawn from the trinitarian idea that the spirit incarnates and returns to itself but in a purified way. Ich liebe Ihre Vorlesungen, aber ihr Verständnis von Religion ist unterkomplex :-) Bitte, bitte traktieren Sie Schleiermacher! At least once!
    All the best from Germany
    Martin

  • @michaelwoodsmccausland5633
    @michaelwoodsmccausland5633 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Indentured Indoctrination

  • @pinosantilli8297
    @pinosantilli8297 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Again the paradox rears its ugly head. Yes you should be the best version of yourself. This is a life long process that many people do not do. But yes the roads need to be built and the hospitals staffed. One must combine the practical with the artistic as they live. But the most important thing is to have the artistic aspect of ourselves as the captain of our lives.

  • @hyperduality2838
    @hyperduality2838 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    The velocity of light is the same and equal for all observers, it is independent of the observer's perspective or 'position' it therefore conforms to a principle of objective democracy. The laws of physics are the same for all observers everywhere, this puts all observers in the same state and bosons are entities that like to be in the same state. This unbiased state is the definition of an objective democracy, a target state, teleology.

    • @hyperduality2838
      @hyperduality2838 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @French Frys Collectivism is dual to individualism.
      The multiverse is dual to the universe.
      Everything (infinity) is dual to nothing (zero).
      "All for one and one for all" -- The 3 musketeers
      The observer is dual to the observed, to get something from nothing requires a second observer.
      Gravitation is equivalent or dual to acceleration -- Einstein's happiest thought
      Energy is dual to mass -- Einstein
      Space is dual to time -- Einstein
      Certainty is dual to uncertainty -- The Heisenberg certainty/uncertainty principle.
      The concept of a multiverse is derived from the concept of a universe, which came first, the chicken or the egg?
      Duality creates reality that is what Hegel is claiming, the Hegelian dialectic.

  • @Dayglodaydreams
    @Dayglodaydreams 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hegel seems like an influencers of progressivism.

  • @RafaelSilvaLivroDorri
    @RafaelSilvaLivroDorri 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Dear Lord. When this guy says "it was not that crazy when Napoleon crowns himself emperor". Seriously? Who can take whatever else he says seriously after that??

    • @franzsperginand113
      @franzsperginand113 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Who said that?

    • @RafaelSilvaLivroDorri
      @RafaelSilvaLivroDorri 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Wesley Cecil. The only person speaking from beginning to end of this video.

    • @franzsperginand113
      @franzsperginand113 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@RafaelSilvaLivroDorri Then surely you heard him say "...in Napoleon's mind..." right before he said that.

    • @RafaelSilvaLivroDorri
      @RafaelSilvaLivroDorri 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@franzsperginand113 Nope. You are probably not watching the video, that's why you are speaking so much nonsense. What comes right before that is: "In Napoleon's mind, the best way (...) was to lead the existent police structure." Then the speaker states "this is not crazy". One of the most ludicrous statements I have ever seen anyone ever make in a lecture.

    • @franzsperginand113
      @franzsperginand113 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@RafaelSilvaLivroDorri Even if you are correct, "this is not crazy" would then refer to the notion of trying to negotiate and meet the form of the existing power structure.

  • @virgilioblanco5374
    @virgilioblanco5374 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    When "outside looking in" of the "Philosophers" of the all the ages, one learn about the profundity of superficialism to fit the millenials of structured ignorance to produce a world of GODLESS gullibles.

  • @tomjohnston6423
    @tomjohnston6423 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Shut the door please i can hear the lecture going on next door and it is very distracting..someone shut the door for gods sake

  • @itssanti
    @itssanti 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Kind of Hagel took Kant's thought and rephrased it, that's all.

    • @inersphobia
      @inersphobia 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Not even close. Hegel did not believe we are born with these twelve categories, a priori. He developed (more in line with Fichte) a process philosophy.

  • @hyperduality2838
    @hyperduality2838 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    The Hegelian Dialectic:- Thesis and its dual anti-thesis produce synthesis
    Thesis is dual to anti-thesis
    Prediction is dual to Entropy

  • @michaelwoodsmccausland5633
    @michaelwoodsmccausland5633 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Leave Napoleon out as his history is inaccurate

  • @alisonleejones3109
    @alisonleejones3109 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Boring!

    • @maxstirner8717
      @maxstirner8717 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Boring, all too boring.

    • @alisonleejones3109
      @alisonleejones3109 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      The delivery

    • @vueltaa_43
      @vueltaa_43 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Interesting enough for me: maybe you just find Hegel boring.

    • @alisonleejones3109
      @alisonleejones3109 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@jonny1982py What a clever boy you are! 🙄

    • @charbam9506
      @charbam9506 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@alisonleejones3109 I respectfully disagree. I suspect your impression is based on very limited exposure to other philosophy lectures...because the vast majority are most obviously nothing like this. The differences are so distinct - which I would love to detail, but a comment reply is not the forum- so just encourage you to check out other lectures/channels...you'll quickly miss what we are all privileged enough to receive here!