These clips, chances doesn't do Brazil credit despite the awesome goals with their passing, flicks and tremendous techniques. The game they played was stunning and needs to be watched in full
Eu estive lá em Sevilha esse dia, saímos de Sintra meu pai, minha irmã e uns amigos brasileiros, pegamos a fila do ingresso, brincamos com os escoceses pela ruas de Sevilha e assistimos um espetáculo de futebol inesquecível. No mesmo dia voltamos para Portugal mas a fronteira estava fechada, dormimos no carro aquele dia. Sensacional.
Essa seleção encantou o mundo.Zico , Falcão , Sócrates, Éder , Leandro , etc ... Jogaram um futebol de arte e magia.Na minha opinião o Serginho chulapa era o único que não era craque.O Telê tinha que colocar o Roberto Dinamite centroavante titular.
Também deveria trocar Cerezo por Batista e liberar Falcão como meia ou segundo volante ! (E ele tinha entrosamento com Batista da época do Internacional)
Faltou dizer que o Waldir Perez só catava bem no São Paulo, na seleção era um frangueiro, Leão no gol teria sido melhor, tava mais velho e experiente como capitão, ia saber colocar ordem e esfriar o jogo, Serginho era um fominha que não pensava no time, e o Dinamite tava comendo a bola nessa época, mas dizem que o Telê tinha umas picuinhas com ele e cortou, não teríamos perdido o jogo para a Itália se essa seleção tivesse Leão e Dinamite.
Este Brasil del 82 fue un verdadero equipazo jugó infinitamente superior que Brasil del 2006 que jugó horrible. Brasil del 2006 tenía estrellas todos solo de nombre nada más pero futbolísticamente cero a la izquierda. Pero Encambio Brasil del 82 lo demostró con su buen fútbol técnica genialidad creatividad efectividad a pesar de no tener tanto jugadores estrellas solamente de nombre como en el 2006.
Todos jogadores aí eram estrelas. Penso que nenhum jogador de 2006 seja superior a algum de 82. Acontece que o futebol não era tão globalizado, então muitas pessoas no exterior não os conheciam. No entanto posso dizer com muita segurança que Roberto Carlos não é melhor que Júnior, Cafu não é melhor que Leandro. Kaka não é melhor que Sócrates e Ronaldinho não é melhor que Zico. Nem vou citar Falcão, Cerezo, Éder
Poor old Scotland,they got absolutely taken apart. Mind you,even though they didn't win in 82,that Brazil side remains,to this day,the best side I've ever seen.
Both teams were superb ,and the final score can be misleading..the Scottish team was great ,maybe the best scottish team ever ,as some people put .and that brazil.in my view too.i remember that cup so many games were worth seeing.unfortunately i haven't seen this very game .thanks for. The opportunity to see its highlights!great! Hello , everyone there have a nice day
..... i had to re-watch these highlights after hearing the Scottisch commentary on this day .......... he said Schotland was dumb to score so early ..... cause it only gonna make the Brazilian more angrier ........😄😄😄😄 o boy ..... he was so wright ....
Scotland had a win and 2 draws but finished 3rd in the group behind Yugoslavia and Brazil on goal difference. Holland did not beat them 2-0 at this World Cup as mentioned either.
I wouldn’t say this is prime football, football is a living sport and will continue to grow and evolve, but this type of play style; we might never see it again and I wish I was born earlier to watch it live. If we look at football before 2010, there are rarely possession play style and no good pass especially before 2000, it’s all quick counter and individual skills, and yes don’t get me wrong there are of course great passers but not just like today’s football, now it’s all possession games, even almost every country who have their own play style are now dying, some example I can give are; Germany with German discipline They capitalised their strength and energy but in today football that can rarely be seen Brazil with their flair, not only is it dying but, certain flair can get you booked England also known for their quick counter is now 110% possession game with 70% of the passes are back pass And yes all these are on the coaches but still, it means they didn’t really care about the heritage. Football becoming too tactical is getting boring to an extent. Netherland are the only country I know who keep their playstyle to this day, and they are a pleasure to watch!
This Scotland team comprised a pool of good players from top clubs in England and Scotland but sadly they failed to progress further in the tournament. Daglish, Souness, Hansen, John Wark, Strachan, John Robertson, Archibald , and few others couldn't match the very very talented Brazilians.
They might have nicked another goal, but Brazil would’ve just pressed the pedal to the metal up front again. One of the funniest quotes I read about Narey’s screamer was that it was the earliest consolation goal in World Cup history! Now that I come to think of it, the gag is a bit generic but it kinda sums up Scotland when it comes to footy!
@@titteryenot4524 Possibly. But in their first two games Brazil were very nervous and took a long time to settle down. The heat clearly affected the Soviets and the Scots but it didn't bother the Italians.
@@Ruda-n4h Yeah, fair play. The Brazil of ‘82 lacked 2 things for me: 1. As you suggest, a slightly wobbly defence. 2. The mental toughness to win the thing. However, in pure beautiful footballing terms and just watchability factor, they were clearly the winners of the tournament. The ‘86 Brazil team were also good. Not as beautiful as this one. After ‘86 Brazil, alas, got practical. Seemed to ditch the impromptu beaches of Rio de Janeiro for the duller European way. And to this day, notwithstanding the occasional wonder boy, such as Neymar (note his lack of mentality, btw, he would’ve fit right into the ‘82 team!), we have a practical, functional Brazil team. Sad.
@@titteryenot4524 Very true. Brazil got better in '86 as the tournament went on and had they got passed France in the quarter-final shoot-out might have had a very good chance in the final against Argentina.
Nunca por nunca Kaká puede haber sido superior que Sócrates ni tampoco Ronaldiño mejor que Zico. Bueno. Haci hubiesen sido todos los jugadores de Brasil del 2006 superior que los jugadores de Brasil de España 82. Pero en el campo habla la verdad que Brasil del 82 lo demostró con un excelente futbol de arte técnica y fantacia que a todos los gustaba y hacia bien con su juego hermoso de Brasil y era una selección arrolladora. Pero en cambio Brasil del 2006 en el mundial jugó horrible parecía que estaban practicando artes marciales todos saltaban y botaban la pelota lejos jugaban muy desordenado sus que ganaban por qué eran Selecciones inferiores odebiles ganaban de pura suerte o con ayuda de los árbitros. El último partido contra Francia en Cuartos de Final fue un desastre su fútbol de Brasil jugó nada más para que no pierda por goleada con Francia el resultado de 1 a 0 fue injusto deberían haber perdido por lo menos. 5 a 0 ante Francia.
These clips, chances doesn't do Brazil credit despite the awesome goals with their passing, flicks and tremendous techniques. The game they played was stunning and needs to be watched in full
Eder's goal was a thing of beauty !!
So was Zico’s!
Eu estive lá em Sevilha esse dia, saímos de Sintra meu pai, minha irmã e uns amigos brasileiros, pegamos a fila do ingresso, brincamos com os escoceses pela ruas de Sevilha e assistimos um espetáculo de futebol inesquecível. No mesmo dia voltamos para Portugal mas a fronteira estava fechada, dormimos no carro aquele dia. Sensacional.
Essa seleção encantou o mundo.Zico , Falcão , Sócrates, Éder , Leandro , etc ... Jogaram um futebol de arte e magia.Na minha opinião o Serginho chulapa era o único que não era craque.O Telê tinha que colocar o Roberto Dinamite centroavante titular.
Também deveria trocar Cerezo por Batista e liberar Falcão como meia ou segundo volante ! (E ele tinha entrosamento com Batista da época do Internacional)
Faltou dizer que o Waldir Perez só catava bem no São Paulo, na seleção era um frangueiro, Leão no gol teria sido melhor, tava mais velho e experiente como capitão, ia saber colocar ordem e esfriar o jogo, Serginho era um fominha que não pensava no time, e o Dinamite tava comendo a bola nessa época, mas dizem que o Telê tinha umas picuinhas com ele e cortou, não teríamos perdido o jogo para a Itália se essa seleção tivesse Leão e Dinamite.
Este Brasil del 82 fue un verdadero equipazo jugó infinitamente superior que Brasil del 2006 que jugó horrible. Brasil del 2006 tenía estrellas todos solo de nombre nada más pero futbolísticamente cero a la izquierda. Pero Encambio Brasil del 82 lo demostró con su buen fútbol técnica genialidad creatividad efectividad a pesar de no tener tanto jugadores estrellas solamente de nombre como en el 2006.
There were 2 things that were lacking in the Brazil ‘82 team: a _really_ solid defence and mentality. Everything else was there.
Todos jogadores aí eram estrelas. Penso que nenhum jogador de 2006 seja superior a algum de 82. Acontece que o futebol não era tão globalizado, então muitas pessoas no exterior não os conheciam. No entanto posso dizer com muita segurança que Roberto Carlos não é melhor que Júnior, Cafu não é melhor que Leandro. Kaka não é melhor que Sócrates e Ronaldinho não é melhor que Zico. Nem vou citar Falcão, Cerezo, Éder
@zdenektesla5538 100% de acuerdo
Poor old Scotland,they got absolutely taken apart. Mind you,even though they didn't win in 82,that Brazil side remains,to this day,the best side I've ever seen.
Zico The Best player World Cup 1982, Zico The White Pelé!!
Yes, i love Brazil 1982 with Zico, Socrates, Falcao, Toninho
Socrates was genious too !!!
@@valtereliasalvespinto1906 And Falcao!!
Nice channel. Thank you so much. Of course came my like. Baku city
Both teams were superb ,and the final score can be misleading..the Scottish team was great ,maybe the best scottish team ever ,as some people put .and that brazil.in my view too.i remember that cup so many games were worth seeing.unfortunately i haven't seen this very game .thanks for. The opportunity to see its highlights!great! Hello , everyone there have a nice day
Fabulous Brasil,but non winner 😞
Zico, the great
World cup 1986, Zico missed penalty in match brazil vs france
@@uefaeuromatch8304 Happens to even the best
@@uefaeuromatch8304 ZICO llegó lesionado al Mundial 1986, sin embargo fue el Mejor jugador del Mundial España 1982.
This is a FIFA match. Not a Euro game.
McKallaster brought me here. That Scotland goal woke up the Brazillians and got thrashed.
..... i had to re-watch these highlights after hearing the Scottisch commentary on this day .......... he said Schotland was dumb to score so early ..... cause it only gonna make the Brazilian more angrier ........😄😄😄😄 o boy ..... he was so wright ....
Sub Eder for Dalglish there, Scotland had half the liverpool team and were SMASHED BY CLASS
What a team!!
Brasil weren't bad either...
This was probably Scotland s best ever team as well...
Nope 1974 was our best team when we were unbeaten in a World Cup and we were better than the then World Champions Brazil🏴
Holland beat ya 2 0
@@davidgammie1310 Why didn't they qualify then?
1978 was Scotlands best team on paper
Scotland had a win and 2 draws but finished 3rd in the group behind Yugoslavia and Brazil on goal difference.
Holland did not beat them 2-0 at this World Cup as mentioned either.
I wouldn’t say this is prime football, football is a living sport and will continue to grow and evolve, but this type of play style; we might never see it again and I wish I was born earlier to watch it live. If we look at football before 2010, there are rarely possession play style and no good pass especially before 2000, it’s all quick counter and individual skills, and yes don’t get me wrong there are of course great passers but not just like today’s football, now it’s all possession games, even almost every country who have their own play style are now dying, some example I can give are;
Germany with German discipline
They capitalised their strength and energy but in today football that can rarely be seen
Brazil with their flair, not only is it dying but, certain flair can get you booked
England also known for their quick counter is now 110% possession game with 70% of the passes are back pass
And yes all these are on the coaches but still, it means they didn’t really care about the heritage.
Football becoming too tactical is getting boring to an extent. Netherland are the only country I know who keep their playstyle to this day, and they are a pleasure to watch!
OMG Zico Falco Socrates
This Scotland team comprised a pool of good players from top clubs in England and Scotland but sadly they failed to progress further in the tournament. Daglish, Souness, Hansen, John Wark, Strachan, John Robertson, Archibald , and few others couldn't match the very very talented Brazilians.
Scotland had some players back then but they never seemed to gel
Zico foi o melhor jogador, mais completo pós Pelé
Verdade.tenho a mesma opinião.
ROMARIO
@@vagnerneves4255 ONLY ROMARIO
My testatone level went up watching this
?????
@pwm3232 pfft you don't know do you? Testarone level been going down since the 80s due to microplastic and other factors
Zico, Socrates~
John "how many times can I say ""good skill"" ? Helm " commentating. What is "bad skill " btw ?
I wonder what would have happened if Scotland had attacked what turned out to be a very suspect Brazilian defence.
They might have nicked another goal, but Brazil would’ve just pressed the pedal to the metal up front again. One of the funniest quotes I read about Narey’s screamer was that it was the earliest consolation goal in World Cup history! Now that I come to think of it, the gag is a bit generic but it kinda sums up Scotland when it comes to footy!
@@titteryenot4524 Possibly. But in their first two games Brazil were very nervous and took a long time to settle down. The heat clearly affected the Soviets and the Scots but it didn't bother the Italians.
@@Ruda-n4h Yeah, fair play. The Brazil of ‘82 lacked 2 things for me: 1. As you suggest, a slightly wobbly defence. 2. The mental toughness to win the thing. However, in pure beautiful footballing terms and just watchability factor, they were clearly the winners of the tournament. The ‘86 Brazil team were also good. Not as beautiful as this one. After ‘86 Brazil, alas, got practical. Seemed to ditch the impromptu beaches of Rio de Janeiro for the duller European way. And to this day, notwithstanding the occasional wonder boy, such as Neymar (note his lack of mentality, btw, he would’ve fit right into the ‘82 team!), we have a practical, functional Brazil team. Sad.
@@titteryenot4524 Very true. Brazil got better in '86 as the tournament went on and had they got passed France in the quarter-final shoot-out might have had a very good chance in the final against Argentina.
Had Scotland a better keeper then that soreline would have been FAR less
Tenían a Leighton en la banca.
Y qué culpa tuvo el arquero en los goles???
The editing of these highlights is absolute rubbish.
Proibido acertar cruzamento kkkkkkk
O irônico é que apesar da vitória elástica foi o pior jogo da seleção naquela copa devido a fragilidade da Escócia.
Saudades do verdadeiro futebol brasileiro. Não essa bosta feia que se pratica hoje no Brasil.
A game most famous for MacKallaster's commentary - th-cam.com/users/shortscdEvihsY6fM
Nunca por nunca Kaká puede haber sido superior que Sócrates ni tampoco Ronaldiño mejor que Zico. Bueno. Haci hubiesen sido todos los jugadores de Brasil del 2006 superior que los jugadores de Brasil de España 82. Pero en el campo habla la verdad que Brasil del 82 lo demostró con un excelente futbol de arte técnica y fantacia que a todos los gustaba y hacia bien con su juego hermoso de Brasil y era una selección arrolladora. Pero en cambio Brasil del 2006 en el mundial jugó horrible parecía que estaban practicando artes marciales todos saltaban y botaban la pelota lejos jugaban muy desordenado sus que ganaban por qué eran Selecciones inferiores odebiles ganaban de pura suerte o con ayuda de los árbitros. El último partido contra Francia en Cuartos de Final fue un desastre su fútbol de Brasil jugó nada más para que no pierda por goleada con Francia el resultado de 1 a 0 fue injusto deberían haber perdido por lo menos. 5 a 0 ante Francia.
Narrador péssimo
Bando de pipoqueiros,nunca jogaram para serem Campeões do mundo.
Que narração péssima e sem emoção.....brochante!
Вы забивайте сколько сможете...мы затем сколько захотим ...Эдер Зико Сократес Фалькао...как они пролетели на том чм...1982
ПОТОМУ ЧТО ФУТБОЛ ЭТО ИГРА А НЕ КЛОУНАДА
Brasil perdió el mundial del 82 por culpa de sergiño y valdir perez