Cool video dude! I did a video about shooting my first roll of Cinestill 800T a while back and I really enjoyed the results I got! I enjoyed your video as well!
Reciprocity factor of the film? When you took the first photo by using two stops overexposure, you might have actually used the correct needed exposure.
I personally got some amazing results throwing it in a point and shoot! I found the colours, contrast, and everything turn out awesome. Not worth the price though, if you can find the original cinema film and a lab that processes ECN-2 then I would go for that, much more economical.
If you want original cinema film you should give “Silbersalz” a try. They offer Vision3 film for 35mm and they develop and scan it like real cinema film
Love the photos of the signs, they look sick! About the dynamic range, that’s odd, Kodak vision 3 is supposed to have like 16 stops of dynamic range (whic is A LOT) when used properly. Idk if the removal of the halation layer on cinestill causes the emulsion to loose some stops, or maybe the reciprocity failure is odd on the film. Had never seen it shot at 500 tho, looks super cool, for me, the grainier the better lol. You could also give it a try rating it at 800
The imaging emulsion of the film is fully exposed before any remaining light is absorbed by the anti-halation remjet layer (which is removed by Cinestill), so that removal neither increases or decreases the "speed" of what starts out as Kodak Vision 3 500T. It's just a 500 ISO film. So why does Cinestill rate it at 800? It's just marketing. Do you think the hipsters would pay $18/roll if it was sold as a film not significantly faster than Portra 400?
@@randallstewart175 I do agree. Idk If I’m wrong, but isn’t the new portra lineup using Kodak vision 3 anyways(do correct me if I’m wrong) .I’ve seen lots of vision 3 developed in ECN-6 and it’s super similar to portra400… I don’t really dig the no hallation look on highlights either tbh. But welp, as long as more and more people keeps getting into and shooting film, I’m happy.
@@joshbarsphotogrpahy5044 I have not heard of any intention to use Vision 3 emulsions as a future replacement for Portra films. It seems very unlikely, as the ECN-2 process, while similar chemically, is not a substitute for C-41 (and visa versa, Cinestill not withstanding). C-41 has been the industry standard for decades, and it not likely to be abandoned now. Also, a dependence on Vision 3 film would required that all processing labs change their processing machinery to deal with remjet removal - a nonstarter.
I've gotten great results from it in 120, not so much in 35mm. Maybe I took my time more with my medium format due to the cost of each shot and just blasted away on the 35mm.
Definitely followed and subscribed after hearing the final comment!
Loved the video man keep it up! Great to see some fellow smaller channels in the suggested video.
Great video man! Glad to stumble upon new film channels!!
Ayyy! Thanks for watching Kelsey 🙏
Algorithm recommended this, enjoyed it.
The last shot of the Disney hall was pretty epic
Really like your channel 💯 keep it up homie, so glad I was recommended this channel
Great vid, really enjoyed it and needed to subscribe. Hoping to see more stuff like that from you in the future ;)
Got this recommended to me. Good stuff ! You are a good host. Best shot imo is at 2 mins
Awesome! Thanks for watching John!
Cool video dude! I did a video about shooting my first roll of Cinestill 800T a while back and I really enjoyed the results I got! I enjoyed your video as well!
Reciprocity factor of the film? When you took the first photo by using two stops overexposure, you might have actually used the correct needed exposure.
Solid images, great work! ✊
Thanks Nuno 🙌
Wow you found parking!! Im impressed :D. Nice Video Thanks!!.
Nice shots man
Pretty awesome!!!
I personally got some amazing results throwing it in a point and shoot! I found the colours, contrast, and everything turn out awesome.
Not worth the price though, if you can find the original cinema film and a lab that processes ECN-2 then I would go for that, much more economical.
That’s awesome! It is risky and expensive lol I have an Olympus Mju, I might have to try that 👍
If you want original cinema film you should give “Silbersalz” a try. They offer Vision3 film for 35mm and they develop and scan it like real cinema film
what a relaxing video :)
Love the photos of the signs, they look sick!
About the dynamic range, that’s odd, Kodak vision 3 is supposed to have like 16 stops of dynamic range (whic is A LOT) when used properly. Idk if the removal of the halation layer on cinestill causes the emulsion to loose some stops, or maybe the reciprocity failure is odd on the film. Had never seen it shot at 500 tho, looks super cool, for me, the grainier the better lol. You could also give it a try rating it at 800
Hmm I will have to try it at 800! Thanks for the input josh!
The imaging emulsion of the film is fully exposed before any remaining light is absorbed by the anti-halation remjet layer (which is removed by Cinestill), so that removal neither increases or decreases the "speed" of what starts out as Kodak Vision 3 500T. It's just a 500 ISO film. So why does Cinestill rate it at 800? It's just marketing. Do you think the hipsters would pay $18/roll if it was sold as a film not significantly faster than Portra 400?
@@randallstewart175 I do agree. Idk If I’m wrong, but isn’t the new portra lineup using Kodak vision 3 anyways(do correct me if I’m wrong) .I’ve seen lots of vision 3 developed in ECN-6 and it’s super similar to portra400… I don’t really dig the no hallation look on highlights either tbh. But welp, as long as more and more people keeps getting into and shooting film, I’m happy.
@@joshbarsphotogrpahy5044 I have not heard of any intention to use Vision 3 emulsions as a future replacement for Portra films. It seems very unlikely, as the ECN-2 process, while similar chemically, is not a substitute for C-41 (and visa versa, Cinestill not withstanding). C-41 has been the industry standard for decades, and it not likely to be abandoned now. Also, a dependence on Vision 3 film would required that all processing labs change their processing machinery to deal with remjet removal - a nonstarter.
It’s hello from Hong Kong, I’ve seen lots of photos as the similar location as your hero shot, may I know the exact location of it?
I've gotten great results from it in 120, not so much in 35mm. Maybe I took my time more with my medium format due to the cost of each shot and just blasted away on the 35mm.
I would recommend this film with medium format cameras , there is much less grain and it looks better in my opinion
I enjoy cinestill 800T you must've bought the wrong version
Nice,,, now do some Portras.