Even Aquinas says that the logician treats being as univocal, but the metaphysician as analogous, further saying that analogous concepts agree in one way and disagree in another. I think the biggest reason for Thomistic rejection (and misunderstanding) of Scotus is that the interpretation of Thomas himself, especially in the manual tradition, has been infected with some degree of Aristotelian nominalism.
I think there's something missing here. Intellect and Will is not enough. I think that can fall into a stoic spirituality. I think Compassion is also a power. It informs both the Intellect and Will. I think we reflect the Father by the Intellect and we reflect the Son by the Will, we reflect the Spirit by Compassion.
![[LIVE] : ONE ลุมพินี 85 | คู่เอก "ยอดเหล็กเพชร vs ผึ้งหลวง"](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Qq_19bnnxEo/mqdefault.jpg)
Even Aquinas says that the logician treats being as univocal, but the metaphysician as analogous, further saying that analogous concepts agree in one way and disagree in another. I think the biggest reason for Thomistic rejection (and misunderstanding) of Scotus is that the interpretation of Thomas himself, especially in the manual tradition, has been infected with some degree of Aristotelian nominalism.
I think there's something missing here. Intellect and Will is not enough. I think that can fall into a stoic spirituality. I think Compassion is also a power. It informs both the Intellect and Will. I think we reflect the Father by the Intellect and we reflect the Son by the Will, we reflect the Spirit by Compassion.