Stanley Bed Rock No608 Type 5 or 6 from 1911-1913 (?)

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 4 ต.ค. 2016
  • Here's the "before" video: pBLJaScsjZ...
    These videos are short project and everyday updates. If you would like to see actual woodworking videos check out my main channel.
    Main Channel: / jayscustomcreations
    My website: www.jayscustomcreations.com

ความคิดเห็น • 56

  • @RXRSawdustStation
    @RXRSawdustStation 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Regardless of the bottom pitting, that is one sweet jointer plane. I believe you've identified it accurately, too. I need to find one that size for some work I have bouncing around in my melon...preferably an older one as well. Happy shaving!

  • @fazmanicg
    @fazmanicg 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    My grandfather and mom both worked at Stanley in New Britain, CT. I grew up there. - Great Vid Jay!

  • @kendehaas668
    @kendehaas668 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    You have done a nice job of tuning up the plane. I am currently tuning up a #6 for a neighbor also. I have not done the research into the year/type. Thanks for sharing your work.

  • @jeffjones5257
    @jeffjones5257 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Their is something magical about hand planes. Something I have yet to learn, but I will.

  • @bubza37
    @bubza37 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    That's gorgeous. Thanks for the history lesson. 👍👍🍦🍦

  • @neilyeag
    @neilyeag 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    You know I have a set of Stanleys from #2 all the way to #8. All of them vintage, but I really never bothered to check any specifics. Your vid has motivated me to look more closely.

  • @theopiner402
    @theopiner402 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    My house was built in 1912. That is a good looking jointer, made to last!

  • @bityard
    @bityard 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice plane! I'm new(ish) to woodworking but I picked up a Stanley #7C jointer plane for cheap moniez on ebay. I believe it was made between 1902 and 1910 or thereabouts. Over a hundred years old and it still works fantastic.

  • @bje005
    @bje005 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Evaporust is the bomb. Great job on the plane!

  • @tooljunkie555
    @tooljunkie555 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    not too shabby for being 103-104yrs old🖒🖒🍻

  • @Thom4123
    @Thom4123 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    That is one bad ass plane. Gotta love those whisper thin shavings. Awesome job tuning it up.

  • @FredMcIntyre
    @FredMcIntyre 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    I love watching antiques roadshow!

  • @WayneT51
    @WayneT51 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great research, what a beautiful plane

  • @StoneandSonsWorkshop
    @StoneandSonsWorkshop 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    That thang is massive!

  • @BradleyMakesThings
    @BradleyMakesThings 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is really cool, Jay! Thanks for sharing.

  • @Brian-Burke
    @Brian-Burke 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    First! And I love Stanley plane videos. Great work, Jay.

  • @Lee-qp6gf
    @Lee-qp6gf 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great jointer. I remember my Dad using his on doors.

  • @reforzar
    @reforzar 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Cool. Almost as old as my American jointer. 😋

  • @ThomasKainer
    @ThomasKainer 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great work Sherlock - cant't wait for season 4 :)
    Regards

  • @triune_blades
    @triune_blades 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Its definitely a grey area. It's not a huge deal unless you're collecting a specific type-which I am. I'm trying to collect the type 6/6a. I have a 608C on it's way to my house right now. ☺️
    On a separate note, you need to clean and sand a little more after you use Evaporust. I use the stuff and if you don't work at cleaning right away, the metal will start losing its luster and will appear as though it's been powder coated. She's still a beauty though.

  • @kevincolburn95
    @kevincolburn95 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very nice. Got my first Stanley #4 this weekend. Have just made a ton of maple shavings with it so far. Still getting some chattering in one direction... learning how to dial it in, and adjust it... I actually had your previous video on plane restoration up on the bench while I went through mine....

    • @kevincolburn95
      @kevincolburn95 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      I will try that. I only get chatter when planing in one direction. If I swap board end for end, it seems to plane just fine. Perhaps it is grain related issue too. It is a new plane, and needs some adjustment before using it well.

    • @kevincolburn95
      @kevincolburn95 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      thanks Barry. It is a proper Stanley brand plane. I've taken it apart when I got it to go through it, and get my head around adjusting it. I'll tighten things down with it, and give it another try. Sure is therapeutic making the shavings though!!

  • @TheKermitClein
    @TheKermitClein 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good research !

  • @summerswoodworking
    @summerswoodworking 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    what a beauty

  • @protect.your.digits.creations
    @protect.your.digits.creations 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank GOD Now I will be able to go to sleep now.......Just kidding Jay ........Always interesting and educational.........
    Protect Your DIGITS........ Gregg

  • @LutherBuilds
    @LutherBuilds 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for this information. I just looked up my 605 Bedrock on this site and mine is a 6c.

  • @JimDockrellWatertone
    @JimDockrellWatertone 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Either way, it's good to go for another 100 years.

  • @sooth15
    @sooth15 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Just my 2 cents: I would leave the japanning as-is. It's about 90% intact, which is better than having it redone. It looks great. Alternatively, you could just touch up the losses.

  • @katherinecarroll3706
    @katherinecarroll3706 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice!!!!

  • @mikezeke7041
    @mikezeke7041 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    that is sexy. I'd like to add a miller falls joiner plane to my collection

  • @anthonydtobias
    @anthonydtobias 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    nice job Magnum p.i.

  • @dday8321
    @dday8321 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Someone could've been making furniture with that jointer over 100 years ago.... wow...

  • @WayneBrownWoodworking
    @WayneBrownWoodworking 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    #Jealous. You always get to do the cool stuff. :-)

  • @Blobjonblob
    @Blobjonblob 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    A well tuned hand plane gives a nice finish than a electric jointer. 2cents

    • @dwainlambrigger3769
      @dwainlambrigger3769 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      totally agree! Finish with the smoother and you have a ready for finish piece.

  • @WoodByWright
    @WoodByWright 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    SO SO SO STINKING SEXY!!!!! sorry but now I have to wipe the drool off my computer. that has been on my purchase list for a long time. My guess is type 5 with a replaced lever cap. That was often switched to show it off. but it could be an early run of a type 6. either way I know guys that would kill for that plane! I have seen them in that condition go for $275.

    • @JayBates2
      @JayBates2  7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks for the input.

  • @williambutler3695
    @williambutler3695 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Have you done a video on sharpening plane/chisel blades?

    • @JayBates2
      @JayBates2  7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Not yet. But I plan on doing so before the end of the year.

  • @jorgejimenez1877
    @jorgejimenez1877 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Made in CT! What!

  • @RedNeckBiker109
    @RedNeckBiker109 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why have a plane this size? Is it easier to use than a shorter one?

  • @David-fv7zg
    @David-fv7zg 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Jay, Im not disagreeing with you, but here is something to consider. I don't think you should eliminate your original premise that this may still be a Type 5-1911. The original criteria that you identified, with the exception of the iron and the cap, fits both the 1911 thru 1913. Your premise for dismissing the Type 5-1911 is based on the bedrock stamp, an interchangeable part. This logic would be false here given the fact that you did not eliminate the possibility of a Type 6 -1912-13 for the same reason of another interchangeable part, the iron. Having given no other information as to why you have selected a type 6, I think it is easily arguable that this CAN BE a type 5 or 6, 1911 - 1913.
    Having said that, I agree it is very likely that this plane is well over 100 years old, regardless of the specifics. To think that for 100 years, a part or two has not been replaced, would be a false assumption. I do agree with you though it is more likely to be a type 6 than a type 5 because of the cap iron, as it is much less likely to be replaced over time as opposed to a blade.
    I realize we have come to the same conclusion, but I'm not sure I would have eliminated the type 5 so easily. Regardless, it's semantics. Great detective work here, thanks for sharing this.

    • @JayBates2
      @JayBates2  7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Agreed. Calling it a Type 5 OR 6 from 1911-1913 is more appropriate.

  • @RickMcQuay
    @RickMcQuay 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    When you start looking up types you are heading toward tool collector territory instead of tool user :)

    • @TheMyeloman
      @TheMyeloman 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Rick McQuay not necessarily, knowing the specific type can help in locating the right replacement parts of need be. It just all depends on who is collecting/using the plane...

    • @RickMcQuay
      @RickMcQuay 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Tracy Luegge Thank you for this insight.

  • @sethbracken
    @sethbracken 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good sleuthing.

  • @grungemunkey
    @grungemunkey 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    What be the point of such a long plane?

    • @ElLocoMonkey2012
      @ElLocoMonkey2012 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      jointing

    • @TheMyeloman
      @TheMyeloman 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Curtis Frost The longer the plane the flatter the surface. A shorter plane, like say a #4, would follow any hills or valleys along the edge whereas this much longer plane will level them all out by staying on top of the high spots while shaving them down. Hope that helps.

  • @JAFBOFilms
    @JAFBOFilms 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi Jay. Best resource for stanley type planes is Patrick's Blood and Gore. It has a list of every type of Stanley plane ever made.
    www.supertool.com/StanleyBG/stan15.htm

  • @waynecreech
    @waynecreech 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    it says all the features of type 5 except....

  • @DOCDARKNESSREAL
    @DOCDARKNESSREAL 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Plane and simple logic… see what i did there , can't resist urge to use bad puns ;)

  • @oobaka1967
    @oobaka1967 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    I could be wrong but you don't sound well. A cold maybe? Your voice sounds slightly different and you seem to have a little trouble breathing.