For such a massive suv to me the trunk space (if you can call it that) is an epic fail. Its almost non existent with the third row up which is killing the point of it being a large vehicle. I love everything else but I just can't get pass the lack of trunk space. Awsome review as usual Kelly. Keep up the good work 👍🏾
Yes. Needed the 2nd row on tracks, third row up a bit(?), and slightly extended back end. Part of this is due to the hybrid system. But some of these were misses that could've been fixed. Not being able to fold flat on top of it all leaves it difficult to justify the price tag with more versatile, practical competitors' alternatives.
I feel like these full size SUVS that are not Suburbans or Expedition Maxes are for people who want a full size SUV and don't need the 3rd row? Like they could get away with something like a Traverse, Highlander, ect, but want the size. I feel like the trunk is a big L especially in this. I also feel like if you have 3 kids in car seats, you should be looking more at a minivan, it's kind of the perfect vehicle for families. Something like this would be better for older families and want the room, but don't need the 3rd row very often. If you don't want a minivan and you still have 3 kids in car seats, then get a Suburban or Expedition Max, then you have the 3 rows and a good sized trunk for strollers, groceries, sports gear. Just keep in mind they are high off the ground compared to crossovers and watch out kids opening the doors in crowded parking lots or make sure they don't fall out.
This was on our short list until I saw the cargo area with the step. That was a big miss by Toyota and diappointing as I have loved our prior Toyota and Lexus SUVs.
I desperately wanted to love this new version. I cannot get over the third row's limitations. The hybrid is a waste as I've seen dozens of reviews now that claim the fuel economy has not improved. Toyota needs to make a Grand version of this with several more inches in length and provide a non-hybrid option.
Same - I held off buying a new suv for over a year in anticipation of the new Sequoia. As a Sequoia owner (2008 for 9 years and 2010 for 2 years) I know the vehicle well and they only thing I wanted going into the 3rd gen was more rear cargo space. The non-fold flat rear cargo area was a huge miss for Toyota. Perhaps a longer version is in the plan for 2025, but I went out and bought a certified Lincoln Navigator L. Aside from push button transmission, which I hate in all vehicles, the Navigator has been the most comfortable SUV I’ve ever driven. I’ll hopefully go back to Toyota once they get their design act together.
The Ford Expedition max is the perfect family car. Ford needs better quality though. We have had so many problems with our expedition. Just make a simple truck. Thats all that regular people want. Stop with the bells and whistles.
wtf, this vehicle is a fail. Toyota intended it to be a family SUV. And it failed. If you want serious towing and moderate off roading then get a Tundra/Tacoma. All the toyota loyalists trying to defend how much this vehicle failed as soon as everyone reviews it and gets to the interior.
Love the review. I’ve been waiting for the new Sequoia since 2015. And what a disappointment it’s been. It irks me that the new Sequoia barely has any trunk space. Absolutely mind boggling. In order to gain trunk space you have to slide the third row seats all the way forward which is completely pointless of have a full size family suv in the first place! You mind as well just lay the third row flat, which again, is completely pointless if you bought the vehicle to use the third row. I had to go home and bring our stroller to the dealer to see if it fits. With the third row halfway pushed back (allowing for kids to fit in the third row) the stroller didn’t fit!!! Un-effin-believable. I’ve always loved the Sequoia and Land Cruisers, my family has owned them going back since the early 90’s and transitioned to the Sequoia in 2001. Without exaggeration I’ve honestly waited for the new Sequoia since 2015. We have 4 kids now, 2 of which are in car seats. It’s impossible to carry 1 all terrain baby stroller back there let alone 2. The insult to injury was when I saw that the 3rd row didn’t even lay flat when folded. Also the omission of sliding second row captain seats was a step backwards since the previous older model platinum allowed this feature. Unfortunately we have no choice but to go with the escalade. Spacious roomy second row captain seats and third row seats and you get more trunk space that’s you “actually” use. I hate American cars but like I said we had no choice. For families that have 3 or more kids that want to actually use the suv’s third row seats and have space for a medium sized stroller, weekly groceries to last the family 1 week, haul the family around with their sports accessories, or travel with the family along with their luggage then trust me when I say you pass on this suv. Or if you’re just looking to do short trip from point a to point b and manage to uncomfortably squeeze everyone and everything into the suv then by all mean go for it. Fyi, anyone who says they love the suv and that it’s perfectly fine with 3 or 4 little ones with car seats and strollers I call BS. Even if you do get a sequoia with a bench seat instead of the bucket seats and put 3 child car seats in a row yet you also use the third row seat then where are you putting your stroller?? If it’s a medium sized stroller and you gave the third row seats space for their legs/knees then there’s no way you’re fitting it in the trunk. And if it’s a cheap compact mini/slim stroller then that’s all you’re going to fit unless you use the shelf but then your third row wont recline and will be in an upright position. So much potential, and we’ve had the same previous model sequoia since the dinosaur age, you’d think they’d come out with a new jaw dropping design in and out. Epic failure.
This is just embarrassing. There are plenty of mid size SUVs with bigger third rows and more trunk space. I get it hybrid battery blah blah. I can’t imagine someone who is in the market for an SUV for the reasons people need one opting for this over anything else.
TX and Grand Highlander was Toyotas way to make up for the complete failure of the Sequoia as a full big size SUV. Tis sequoia should have the interior design space of the grand highlander if not more with how big it is.
We were able to fully check out a 23 sequoia WITH A BENCH and it was amazing! Fit 3 across with room to spare between car seats. If you only needed to occasionally use the third row (like we would plan to do) this car would very much work for 3 kiddos! it is definitely worth hunting one down to check it out yourself!
Great review. My wife love you and loves showing me your content, since I am more of an offorad/overlanding follower for car content. The dichotomy of what is good and bad between the two on the same vehicle is amusing. That being said: The Sequoia really makes more sense when you view it as an XL 5 seat SUV that "happens" to have a part time 3rd row than a true 3rd row SUV. The quirks with the seats and the storage space of the cargo area start to make a LOT more sense through that lens. boosted HP and towing for equivalent MPGs to the 4runner with more cabin space make the price difference more palatable as well compared to the smaller "cheaper" 4runner. IMO
This is a great point. The Sequoia is basically a 4runner XL. I loved my 4runner, went to a F250 crew now looking to go back to a toyota. 4runner would be too small with 2 teens and a tween. Our Honda Odyssey has great space, can haul full sheets of plywood but I would not tow over 3k lbs with it
That trunk space is abysmal. If it’s supposed to be a family car, maybe they should have talked to literally one mom about what families actually need in a car?? Like, only ONE tether anchor in the third row and they chose the MIDDLE seat to put it?? And no lower anchors in the third row?? And the second row not on tracks? Absolutely not. So sad because it’s a beautiful car.
It’s a fail because of the hybrid engine. The battery is under the second and third row and destroys storage space and raises the bottom and for what? the hybrid Sequoia it doesn’t get far superior fuel economy over an expedition or a Tahoe or Yukon people like flat loading space for, dog cages, and many other reasons. Toyota succumbed to institutional investment pressure to force hybrid powertrains into these things and it’s a fail.
I got my 8 passenger 2023 Sequoia last December. There are obviously some trade offs from the older model. But I do love the much improved body style and dash! I love it so much I’ve just adapted to the lack of great “trunk space” and the 2 and 1 middle row rather than the 3 individual middle row on tracks like my old one I have 4 kids and we do just great. I just have 1 kids left in a booster. If I had more than 2 car seats though, I would be frustrated and not recommend this model. I’m so happy with my purchase and love all your car reviews, Kelly!! Thank you!
@@kayleighstreet6250 I would suggest taking your car seats and doing a test run putting them in and having the kids getting in and out to see if it would work for your family. That is what we always do before getting a new car. I would take the stroller too. Need to know how that would fit as well!
How old are your kids? I have a 9 (almost 10) and 14 (almost 15) year old. The youngest plays soccer and the oldest does whatever highschoolers do. Would this work for them?
@@kayleighstreet6250Anyone with 3 kids or more needs that middle bench (not the fancy captain’s seats). Due to the small truck size, you will definitely need to fold down 2/3 or all of the back (3rd row) seat during road trips which involve luggage. I have 4 kids and I owned the older version and that one had a flatter trunk (no hybrid battery). With the middle bench and one seat up in the 3rd row, we made it work. Honestly, anyone with more than 3 kids shouldn’t have this truck high on their list unless you don’t plan to travel annually as we do.
Love your review! The raised cargo floor is a fatal flaw for this/any SUV…it ruins the Utility. I understand they did it for the hybrid battery pack. Poor execution. Won’t buy one for that reason.
Unless you need to tow or go off-road, this seems to fall way behind minivans for utility. An Odyssey has double the cubic feet of storage space behind the third row for tens of thousands of dollars less.
i feel like the shelf would be a good idea in a midsize SUV with good 3rd row leg room but it would be unnecessary in the sequoia if the 2nd row was on tracks.
It's a no for me. From the lack of 3rd row access especially when it would come down to car pick up line to the car seat situation and then the trunk is disgusting... the 3rd row should have the full space and the trunk should be larger. I have twin newborns and 2 older kiddos and that trunk wouldn't even fit a standard stroller or a stroller with groceries. It's just not functional
All the things you're looking for are found in a minivan basically. Also the reason why the trunk is small and the leg room is the same as other cars with bigger trunks is because there is probably a practical limit to how long a passenger car can be and the engine compartment is big on this car. If it were smaller like in the Sienna then everything is moved further up and the trunk can be bigger.
NAhhhhhhhh, stop making excuse for toyota. This is a HUGE suv, 3 rows, 7-8 seats. Toyota just failed miserably when doing the interior. Toyota stans continue to do weak excuses to defend them, like get a grand highlander, get a minivan. Then why did toyota make this sequoia? Because they wanted to compete against the big suvs tahoe, expedition etc. And they have failed again.
I'm at the stage in life where we need an adult friendly 3rd row with still usable storage when the 3rd row is in use. I really like the looks of the Sequoia, but the packaging of the rear for both passengers and cargo is just a massive swing and a miss, especially when compared to other Toyota vehicles like the Grand Highlander. I've looked at the main BOF competitors--Wagoneer, Expedition, and Yukon, and even disregarding their extended wheelbase versions, their rear passenger/cargo packaging is lightyears better than the Sequoia. I don't understand how Toyota dropped the ball so badly with the rear packaging.
For all the requirements you want, may I suggest you get an old school bus and take out the last 5 row of seats. You'll be much happier with all the space for passengers and space for everything else.
@@soniarena5250 actually buyer survey show that men are much more agreeable to minivans because you can pull out the seats fold them flat and fit drywall in them and furniture. Every survey shows women hate minivans.
Mom of 3 kids here and I’m torn. Mine are older so only my youngest is in a booster. I’m wondering if a sequoia with a bench seat might work for me so I can have the 3rd row down? Or at least keep one side of the 3rd row down? I’ve heard the grand highlander will have more leg room and trunk space but I had my heart set on a sequoia!
The comments from the majority don't lie. Many of us wanted this because we did not want to go with an American brand for a FULL/BIG SUV for 7-8 seats. We thought finally we could have our cake and eat it too with this redesigned Toyota Sequoia since the outgoing generation was already dated. The excitement was high when the exterior photos showed. But when the specs of the fuel economy and the review of the interior finally started rolling in, it was DOA. There was no compromising those big short comings JUST TO OWN A TOYOTA--although some in the comments are in denial and continue to defend it. The interior is a complete failure for a 7-8 seater SUV. People saying get a highlander or Minivan are making excuses. Then to that I say why get this for towing and offroading--get a TUNDRA/TACOMA. In a few years mark this post that we'll see low numbers and how this was a failure for Toyota. NO ONE is buying this who is looking for a 7-8 seater SUV when ALLLLLL the competitors all do better in this class. You think a family ready to shell out $60-80K will just compromise the big shortfalls of this? Nope, they'll see the competition and go with their offering.
First row out of the park, second row missing video screens for the kids, third row bad ( lack of wishbone so floor elevated) , storage/trunk….catastrophic.
You made a believer out of me. This is a beautiful family vehicle. Are there options for rear seat entertainment with separate screens for each kid in the back with either HDMI or USB C video ports to connect their Nintendo Switch or Pad to?
I’m just frustrated how Toyota literally screwed up the third row for a family of 5 plus the dog! I’m a long term Toyota fan simply because I love my money and I want to invest my hard earned money in companies that focuses on reliability.. and Toyota does just that… My current Toyota truck is 12 years old and it just runs!!!! common Toyota please fix the third row of this awesome suv within the next 2 years when I’m ready to buy!!! Even with the third row down, it still restricts the height due to the battery pack.. ughhhhhh!!! I’m soo torn!! If only ford, stelantis or GM had the same quality and reliability as Japanese auto makers I would switched in a heart beat!! 😢😢
In a channel called the car MOM I would expect a double-stroller test not just a car seat test. That's the ultimate cargo test. Can you stick a double Vista back there when the 3rd row is up or not??
It’s just not a true full size compared to the others. 3rd in a full size shouldn’t even remotely be uncomfortable or a sacrifice and definitely should have equivalent trunk space. It’s frustrating they charge so much when it’s not a true full size but they charge for it and same for regular highlander not a true midsize but they charge too much for what it is. The sequoia is honestly more of a true midsize but on the big end def not full size.
86% of families do not need a third row. But they sure could use some cargo space which this does not have much of. Had to pass and keep my 2021 Sequoia. Hey Toyota, Ditch the hybrid, offer 3rd row delete, and these will be the hottest selling SUV on the market.
It has the worst Ride ever, you will break your back while riding the sequioa capstone. there is nothing comfortable about this car. If anybody has options to change the rear air bag to springs .......hoping for your reply
Been looking at this comparted to the Tahoe Z71 and I feel that the trunk in the Tahoe is way better than the Toyota. Night and day. I understand that the battery pack is there on the Toyota but it just doesn't seem practical at all and especially when you fold the 3rd row down in both vehicles the Tahoe is massive. I just wish the Z71 Tahoe came with some sort of center locking diff or something to compete more with the TRD off road Sequoia.
We were hard core Toyota people until we learned how LOWSY they are at rear storage space 🤬🤬 for such giant vehicles, if you have more than two kids, your basically screwed OR if you never go on road trips where you have to bring... Stuff... With three or more young kids, almost all of their vehicle options are a huge miss.
Toyota must have figured you'd buy a Sienna or Grand Highlander if you want to move people, but not tow. If you want to tow, and bring 6-7 people, then you can put your cargo inside the trailer you're towing. I have a '21 Sequoia and test drove the '23 Platinum Sequoia; the inside is about 1/3 smaller in the new one (much closer to 4Runner or Land Cruiser in terms of total interior volume) Someone else said the Jeep Wagoneer feels like the spiritual successor to the Sequoia and I think I agree. This one is awesome but ultimately too small inside. BTW; my '21 Sequoia has power fold-flat third row, physical knobs and buttons for climate control, lower tether anchors on every rear seat (so, 6, in mine) independent rear suspension, adaptive cruise, carplay, etc etc
awesome video. those mirrors are so big because that vehicle is equipped with the towing package; most sequoias will include the much smaller, sleeker, body colored mirrors (the stock video towards the beginning of the review shows these mirrors :)
I think if your a Toyota diehard and you have the money your going with the Sequoia, period. However, if you are unbiased and a people/cargo hauler is your goal, you can’t go this route. It’s just not that great at being a people/cargo. As a matter fact, it’s not even the best Toyota to get if being a people/cargo hauler is your goal. That would go to the Grand Highlander.
My wife and I are looking for a new family truck, are first choice was the Toyota but after seeing this review we may go with something else. We like to take the kids to the drive-in and sit in the back of the truck. And you can't do this with the Toyota.😢😢
my 2012 honda odyssey sits 8 has more leg room in the 3rd row and a huge, deep trunk. wtf? like how? this SUV looks massive, yet they ruined it with those features
Sadly Toyota dropped the ball on this Sequoia than the last generation when it comes to cargo space. The adjustable shelf system to me is a gimmick. The Grand highlander is far better for cargo space.
For such an expensive SUV, there are so many things they dropped the ball on. I would NEVER buy something this expensive to fit my family and yet have no trunk space. What is the point? There are SO many better options in this price range that actually have a trunk. And second row on tracks. I feel like this needs a massive reworking.
So really, skip this and get a Ford Expedition/ Lincoln Navigator, especially the longer wheelbase versions if you plan on using 3rd row seats and need trunk space.
I have had the new 2023 sequoia for almost 7 mo the now. I got the one with the 2nd row bench seat, and I love it so much!!! I usually get cars with captains, but im enjoying the bench!! I love my new sequoia!!
This suv was not made for people that need space so start looking the other way i just got mine and its only four of us i could of gotten a corrola but i just like the way it looks and how it drives so i was like fuck it why not….
You forgot to mention that the remote start feature is not free after three months and requires a subscription. That and the stupid shelf system is a deal breaker for me which is sad bc I am a big Toyota fan.
This vehicle lost me with the lack of tilt and slide second row seats. If you can’t leave the car seats in place all while trying to access the third row then that SUV isn’t worth it at all.
It looks so much bigger on the outside than the inside that’s what I don’t like. The same with the Highlander. Idk what Toyotas deal is with making the inside space so small
Get a Tundra crew cab. Great for 3 passengers In the backseat. More functionality than a Seqouia. Plus lots of space in the covered truck bed for hauling , groceries etc. We love it. I’ve got 3 year old twins and they can’t reach other and fight in the backseat. 😂. Dual front heated and cooled seats. Platinum 2023
I am looking to trade my F250 crew for a Sequoia. When my three girls were small sitting three across was great. Now they are teens and tweens no one wants to sit in the middle for long car rides. ALWAYS a fight to get the window seats and complaining about one girl touching the other.
Looked at one in OKC. The trunk was beyond disappointing. I wouldn’t be able to grocery shop let alone have 3 kids with an SUV like that. And it had a 98k price tag!
the third row seating I believe was affected heavily by the hybrid powertrain as I think the battery had to be stored underneath. For me I really like the new Sequoia wish they kept the V8 but am looking at it as a new car for the wife. but will not be paying for the Platnium car is not worth that much especially with all those motorized bits like the steps easy to break when you overland.
I’ve got a 2019 Sequoia and looked at this specifically for your review. I hate the trunk on the 23. My 2019 folds flat and I feel like I have more room when the seats are up on my 2019. The trunk is a big negative for me. Thankfully I have teenagers (2) so it’s not a deal breaker for me.
toyota has the grand highlander for all the interior room it's basically the big family car and rhe seqouia is like the fun off road car for a family with older kids
For such a massive suv to me the trunk space (if you can call it that) is an epic fail. Its almost non existent with the third row up which is killing the point of it being a large vehicle. I love everything else but I just can't get pass the lack of trunk space. Awsome review as usual Kelly. Keep up the good work 👍🏾
Yes. Needed the 2nd row on tracks, third row up a bit(?), and slightly extended back end. Part of this is due to the hybrid system. But some of these were misses that could've been fixed. Not being able to fold flat on top of it all leaves it difficult to justify the price tag with more versatile, practical competitors' alternatives.
@@HUhurdler1:45
That’s why I would go for a Expedition Max
This is a large hybrid, so the electric engine look up a lot of space
so how many bodies can i fit in the sequioa
I feel like these full size SUVS that are not Suburbans or Expedition Maxes are for people who want a full size SUV and don't need the 3rd row? Like they could get away with something like a Traverse, Highlander, ect, but want the size. I feel like the trunk is a big L especially in this. I also feel like if you have 3 kids in car seats, you should be looking more at a minivan, it's kind of the perfect vehicle for families. Something like this would be better for older families and want the room, but don't need the 3rd row very often. If you don't want a minivan and you still have 3 kids in car seats, then get a Suburban or Expedition Max, then you have the 3 rows and a good sized trunk for strollers, groceries, sports gear. Just keep in mind they are high off the ground compared to crossovers and watch out kids opening the doors in crowded parking lots or make sure they don't fall out.
You should also review the grand highlander or Lexus TX
Yes please Lexus TX need out of my Honda Odyssey
Want the TX
This was on our short list until I saw the cargo area with the step. That was a big miss by Toyota and diappointing as I have loved our prior Toyota and Lexus SUVs.
Review the Grand Highlander next!
Yes please!!!
Had the same opinion. That trunk 🤦🏼♀️ no. I only have two kiddos and I just couldn’t work with that trunk design.
I desperately wanted to love this new version. I cannot get over the third row's limitations. The hybrid is a waste as I've seen dozens of reviews now that claim the fuel economy has not improved. Toyota needs to make a Grand version of this with several more inches in length and provide a non-hybrid option.
Same - I held off buying a new suv for over a year in anticipation of the new Sequoia. As a Sequoia owner (2008 for 9 years and 2010 for 2 years) I know the vehicle well and they only thing I wanted going into the 3rd gen was more rear cargo space. The non-fold flat rear cargo area was a huge miss for Toyota. Perhaps a longer version is in the plan for 2025, but I went out and bought a certified Lincoln Navigator L. Aside from push button transmission, which I hate in all vehicles, the Navigator has been the most comfortable SUV I’ve ever driven. I’ll hopefully go back to Toyota once they get their design act together.
The Ford Expedition max is the perfect family car. Ford needs better quality though. We have had so many problems with our expedition. Just make a simple truck. Thats all that regular people want. Stop with the bells and whistles.
Thanks for the info. What year is yours?
What issues have you had?
If you want a pseudo-minivan get the Grand Highlander. The Sequoia is for serious towing and moderate off-roading.
wtf, this vehicle is a fail. Toyota intended it to be a family SUV. And it failed. If you want serious towing and moderate off roading then get a Tundra/Tacoma. All the toyota loyalists trying to defend how much this vehicle failed as soon as everyone reviews it and gets to the interior.
Love the review. I’ve been waiting for the new Sequoia since 2015. And what a disappointment it’s been. It irks me that the new Sequoia barely has any trunk space. Absolutely mind boggling. In order to gain trunk space you have to slide the third row seats all the way forward which is completely pointless of have a full size family suv in the first place! You mind as well just lay the third row flat, which again, is completely pointless if you bought the vehicle to use the third row. I had to go home and bring our stroller to the dealer to see if it fits. With the third row halfway pushed back (allowing for kids to fit in the third row) the stroller didn’t fit!!! Un-effin-believable. I’ve always loved the Sequoia and Land Cruisers, my family has owned them going back since the early 90’s and transitioned to the Sequoia in 2001. Without exaggeration I’ve honestly waited for the new Sequoia since 2015. We have 4 kids now, 2 of which are in car seats. It’s impossible to carry 1 all terrain baby stroller back there let alone 2. The insult to injury was when I saw that the 3rd row didn’t even lay flat when folded. Also the omission of sliding second row captain seats was a step backwards since the previous older model platinum allowed this feature. Unfortunately we have no choice but to go with the escalade. Spacious roomy second row captain seats and third row seats and you get more trunk space that’s you “actually” use. I hate American cars but like I said we had no choice. For families that have 3 or more kids that want to actually use the suv’s third row seats and have space for a medium sized stroller, weekly groceries to last the family 1 week, haul the family around with their sports accessories, or travel with the family along with their luggage then trust me when I say you pass on this suv. Or if you’re just looking to do short trip from point a to point b and manage to uncomfortably squeeze everyone and everything into the suv then by all mean go for it. Fyi, anyone who says they love the suv and that it’s perfectly fine with 3 or 4 little ones with car seats and strollers I call BS. Even if you do get a sequoia with a bench seat instead of the bucket seats and put 3 child car seats in a row yet you also use the third row seat then where are you putting your stroller?? If it’s a medium sized stroller and you gave the third row seats space for their legs/knees then there’s no way you’re fitting it in the trunk. And if it’s a cheap compact mini/slim stroller then that’s all you’re going to fit unless you use the shelf but then your third row wont recline and will be in an upright position. So much potential, and we’ve had the same previous model sequoia since the dinosaur age, you’d think they’d come out with a new jaw dropping design in and out. Epic failure.
The grand highlander or Lexus tx has more room which will satisfy families
This is just embarrassing. There are plenty of mid size SUVs with bigger third rows and more trunk space. I get it hybrid battery blah blah. I can’t imagine someone who is in the market for an SUV for the reasons people need one opting for this over anything else.
Can’t wait for a Lexus TX and Grand Highlander for comparison. Thanks for all your videos.
TX and Grand Highlander was Toyotas way to make up for the complete failure of the Sequoia as a full big size SUV. Tis sequoia should have the interior design space of the grand highlander if not more with how big it is.
We were able to fully check out a 23 sequoia WITH A BENCH and it was amazing! Fit 3 across with room to spare between car seats. If you only needed to occasionally use the third row (like we would plan to do) this car would very much work for 3 kiddos! it is definitely worth hunting one down to check it out yourself!
Love my 2023 Toyota Sienna. Much better visibility.
Great review. My wife love you and loves showing me your content, since I am more of an offorad/overlanding follower for car content. The dichotomy of what is good and bad between the two on the same vehicle is amusing. That being said: The Sequoia really makes more sense when you view it as an XL 5 seat SUV that "happens" to have a part time 3rd row than a true 3rd row SUV. The quirks with the seats and the storage space of the cargo area start to make a LOT more sense through that lens. boosted HP and towing for equivalent MPGs to the 4runner with more cabin space make the price difference more palatable as well compared to the smaller "cheaper" 4runner. IMO
This is a great point. The Sequoia is basically a 4runner XL. I loved my 4runner, went to a F250 crew now looking to go back to a toyota. 4runner would be too small with 2 teens and a tween. Our Honda Odyssey has great space, can haul full sheets of plywood but I would not tow over 3k lbs with it
Exterior looks nice, interior logistics with seating and trunk space is horrible for a family of small kiddos.
That trunk space is abysmal. If it’s supposed to be a family car, maybe they should have talked to literally one mom about what families actually need in a car?? Like, only ONE tether anchor in the third row and they chose the MIDDLE seat to put it?? And no lower anchors in the third row?? And the second row not on tracks? Absolutely not. So sad because it’s a beautiful car.
It’s a fail because of the hybrid engine. The battery is under the second and third row and destroys storage space and raises the bottom and for what? the hybrid Sequoia it doesn’t get far superior fuel economy over an expedition or a Tahoe or Yukon people like flat loading space for, dog cages, and many other reasons. Toyota succumbed to institutional investment pressure to force hybrid powertrains into these things and it’s a fail.
I got my 8 passenger 2023 Sequoia last December. There are obviously some trade offs from the older model. But I do love the much improved body style and dash!
I love it so much I’ve just adapted to the lack of great “trunk space” and the 2 and 1 middle row rather than the 3 individual middle row on tracks like my old one
I have 4 kids and we do just great. I just have 1 kids left in a booster. If I had more than 2 car seats though, I would be frustrated and not recommend this model.
I’m so happy with my purchase and love all your car reviews, Kelly!! Thank you!
We have 2 in car seats 2 in boosters. So this is a no go?
@@kayleighstreet6250 I would suggest taking your car seats and doing a test run putting them in and having the kids getting in and out to see if it would work for your family. That is what we always do before getting a new car. I would take the stroller too. Need to know how that would fit as well!
How old are your kids? I have a 9 (almost 10) and 14 (almost 15) year old. The youngest plays soccer and the oldest does whatever highschoolers do. Would this work for them?
@@kayleighstreet6250Anyone with 3 kids or more needs that middle bench (not the fancy captain’s seats). Due to the small truck size, you will definitely need to fold down 2/3 or all of the back (3rd row) seat during road trips which involve luggage. I have 4 kids and I owned the older version and that one had a flatter trunk (no hybrid battery). With the middle bench and one seat up in the 3rd row, we made it work. Honestly, anyone with more than 3 kids shouldn’t have this truck high on their list unless you don’t plan to travel annually as we do.
Love your review! The raised cargo floor is a fatal flaw for this/any SUV…it ruins the Utility. I understand they did it for the hybrid battery pack. Poor execution. Won’t buy one for that reason.
Unless you need to tow or go off-road, this seems to fall way behind minivans for utility. An Odyssey has double the cubic feet of storage space behind the third row for tens of thousands of dollars less.
My moms surburban has way more trunk space with the third row still uo. Think toyota missed out on a few things here for a 79k price tag.
Sequoia does not compete with Suburban. It competes with Tahoe
not very dog friendly with the 3rd row folded down ,no room for a dog crate
i feel like the shelf would be a good idea in a midsize SUV with good 3rd row leg room but it would be unnecessary in the sequoia if the 2nd row was on tracks.
It's a no for me. From the lack of 3rd row access especially when it would come down to car pick up line to the car seat situation and then the trunk is disgusting... the 3rd row should have the full space and the trunk should be larger.
I have twin newborns and 2 older kiddos and that trunk wouldn't even fit a standard stroller or a stroller with groceries. It's just not functional
Trunk alone makes this a massive fail for 90% of people that buy this for. Like moms with kids.
All the things you're looking for are found in a minivan basically. Also the reason why the trunk is small and the leg room is the same as other cars with bigger trunks is because there is probably a practical limit to how long a passenger car can be and the engine compartment is big on this car. If it were smaller like in the Sienna then everything is moved further up and the trunk can be bigger.
NAhhhhhhhh, stop making excuse for toyota. This is a HUGE suv, 3 rows, 7-8 seats. Toyota just failed miserably when doing the interior. Toyota stans continue to do weak excuses to defend them, like get a grand highlander, get a minivan. Then why did toyota make this sequoia? Because they wanted to compete against the big suvs tahoe, expedition etc. And they have failed again.
I'm at the stage in life where we need an adult friendly 3rd row with still usable storage when the 3rd row is in use. I really like the looks of the Sequoia, but the packaging of the rear for both passengers and cargo is just a massive swing and a miss, especially when compared to other Toyota vehicles like the Grand Highlander.
I've looked at the main BOF competitors--Wagoneer, Expedition, and Yukon, and even disregarding their extended wheelbase versions, their rear passenger/cargo packaging is lightyears better than the Sequoia. I don't understand how Toyota dropped the ball so badly with the rear packaging.
For all the requirements you want, may I suggest you get an old school bus and take out the last 5 row of seats. You'll be much happier with all the space for passengers and space for everything else.
The math isn’t mathing… 😂😂
Big car just has the inside use all wrong for my preference.
Love the outside just the inside needs work 😅
You can remove those batteries
The best car for a mom with 2 or more kids is the mini van. Everyone knows it.
What about the dads? Is the mini van the best car for them too?
@@soniarena5250 actually buyer survey show that men are much more agreeable to minivans because you can pull out the seats fold them flat and fit drywall in them and furniture. Every survey shows women hate minivans.
Mom of 3 kids here and I’m torn. Mine are older so only my youngest is in a booster. I’m wondering if a sequoia with a bench seat might work for me so I can have the 3rd row down? Or at least keep one side of the 3rd row down? I’ve heard the grand highlander will have more leg room and trunk space but I had my heart set on a sequoia!
Is the CAPSTONE better?
th-cam.com/video/-Hs72HQamRU/w-d-xo.html
The comments from the majority don't lie. Many of us wanted this because we did not want to go with an American brand for a FULL/BIG SUV for 7-8 seats. We thought finally we could have our cake and eat it too with this redesigned Toyota Sequoia since the outgoing generation was already dated. The excitement was high when the exterior photos showed. But when the specs of the fuel economy and the review of the interior finally started rolling in, it was DOA. There was no compromising those big short comings JUST TO OWN A TOYOTA--although some in the comments are in denial and continue to defend it. The interior is a complete failure for a 7-8 seater SUV. People saying get a highlander or Minivan are making excuses. Then to that I say why get this for towing and offroading--get a TUNDRA/TACOMA. In a few years mark this post that we'll see low numbers and how this was a failure for Toyota. NO ONE is buying this who is looking for a 7-8 seater SUV when ALLLLLL the competitors all do better in this class. You think a family ready to shell out $60-80K will just compromise the big shortfalls of this? Nope, they'll see the competition and go with their offering.
They really need a long version to compete with the Burb or Yukon XL. People need to haul people and things simultaneously.
First row out of the park, second row missing video screens for the kids, third row bad
( lack of wishbone so floor elevated) , storage/trunk….catastrophic.
You made a believer out of me. This is a beautiful family vehicle. Are there options for rear seat entertainment with separate screens for each kid in the back with either HDMI or USB C video ports to connect their Nintendo Switch or Pad to?
I’m just frustrated how Toyota literally screwed up the third row for a family of 5 plus the dog! I’m a long term Toyota fan simply because I love my money and I want to invest my hard earned money in companies that focuses on reliability.. and Toyota does just that… My current Toyota truck is 12 years old and it just runs!!!! common Toyota please fix the third row of this awesome suv within the next 2 years when I’m ready to buy!!! Even with the third row down, it still restricts the height due to the battery pack.. ughhhhhh!!! I’m soo torn!!
If only ford, stelantis or GM had the same quality and reliability as Japanese auto makers I would switched in a heart beat!! 😢😢
the math isn't mathing -- you got that right! A bigger/newer Sequoia but a smaller trunk? Yikes, Toyota...
In a channel called the car MOM I would expect a double-stroller test not just a car seat test. That's the ultimate cargo test. Can you stick a double Vista back there when the 3rd row is up or not??
It’s just not a true full size compared to the others. 3rd in a full size shouldn’t even remotely be uncomfortable or a sacrifice and definitely should have equivalent trunk space. It’s frustrating they charge so much when it’s not a true full size but they charge for it and same for regular highlander not a true midsize but they charge too much for what it is. The sequoia is honestly more of a true midsize but on the big end def not full size.
86% of families do not need a third row. But they sure could use some cargo space which this does not have much of. Had to pass and keep my 2021 Sequoia. Hey Toyota, Ditch the hybrid, offer 3rd row delete, and these will be the hottest selling SUV on the market.
It has the worst Ride ever, you will break your back while riding the sequioa capstone. there is nothing comfortable about this car. If anybody has options to change the rear air bag to springs .......hoping for your reply
Been looking at this comparted to the Tahoe Z71 and I feel that the trunk in the Tahoe is way better than the Toyota. Night and day. I understand that the battery pack is there on the Toyota but it just doesn't seem practical at all and especially when you fold the 3rd row down in both vehicles the Tahoe is massive. I just wish the Z71 Tahoe came with some sort of center locking diff or something to compete more with the TRD off road Sequoia.
We were hard core Toyota people until we learned how LOWSY they are at rear storage space 🤬🤬 for such giant vehicles, if you have more than two kids, your basically screwed OR if you never go on road trips where you have to bring... Stuff... With three or more young kids, almost all of their vehicle options are a huge miss.
Toyota must have figured you'd buy a Sienna or Grand Highlander if you want to move people, but not tow. If you want to tow, and bring 6-7 people, then you can put your cargo inside the trailer you're towing. I have a '21 Sequoia and test drove the '23 Platinum Sequoia; the inside is about 1/3 smaller in the new one (much closer to 4Runner or Land Cruiser in terms of total interior volume)
Someone else said the Jeep Wagoneer feels like the spiritual successor to the Sequoia and I think I agree. This one is awesome but ultimately too small inside.
BTW; my '21 Sequoia has power fold-flat third row, physical knobs and buttons for climate control, lower tether anchors on every rear seat (so, 6, in mine) independent rear suspension, adaptive cruise, carplay, etc etc
awesome video. those mirrors are so big because that vehicle is equipped with the towing package; most sequoias will include the much smaller, sleeker, body colored mirrors (the stock video towards the beginning of the review shows these mirrors :)
80,000 are you crazy. I would consider if these dealerships had a 100,000 mile warranty on the entire vehicle.
I think if your a Toyota diehard and you have the money your going with the Sequoia, period. However, if you are unbiased and a people/cargo hauler is your goal, you can’t go this route. It’s just not that great at being a people/cargo. As a matter fact, it’s not even the best Toyota to get if being a people/cargo hauler is your goal. That would go to the Grand Highlander.
My wife and I are looking for a new family truck, are first choice was the Toyota but after seeing this review we may go with something else. We like to take the kids to the drive-in and sit in the back of the truck. And you can't do this with the Toyota.😢😢
my 2012 honda odyssey sits 8 has more leg room in the 3rd row and a huge, deep trunk. wtf? like how? this SUV looks massive, yet they ruined it with those features
My wish list:
-Full time 4WD (I look at this as a safety feature for my family)
-Non Hybrid Option
I love my 2015 Sienna mini van all the seating and trunk space I need for a family of 6
Sadly Toyota dropped the ball on this Sequoia than the last generation when it comes to cargo space. The adjustable shelf system to me is a gimmick. The Grand highlander is far better for cargo space.
I wish toyota gives more trunk space, 2 feet would be awesome. Families can’t go anywhere far with that tiny trunks.
For such an expensive SUV, there are so many things they dropped the ball on. I would NEVER buy something this expensive to fit my family and yet have no trunk space. What is the point? There are SO many better options in this price range that actually have a trunk. And second row on tracks. I feel like this needs a massive reworking.
the cargo space is a big ol' NOPE
shelf = stupid. now my dog is just going to jump in and get stuck in that weird hole...
So really, skip this and get a Ford Expedition/ Lincoln Navigator, especially the longer wheelbase versions if you plan on using 3rd row seats and need trunk space.
the trunk space is so sad....a waste of a great vehicle. Why didn't day make it as long as the Tundra, which will be awesome.
This is a brand new platform so reliability is reset to 0. Toyota has messed up big time with this redesign of Seqouia.
I have had the new 2023 sequoia for almost 7 mo the now. I got the one with the 2nd row bench seat, and I love it so much!!! I usually get cars with captains, but im enjoying the bench!! I love my new sequoia!!
How many kids do you have? This is what I’m wanting to do. I have 3 and they’re 14, 11 and 8. Only my youngest is in a booster still.
I don't think any Toyota engineers care about family friendly here. This SUV is definitely not for family or Uber
This suv was not made for people that need space so start looking the other way i just got mine and its only four of us i could of gotten a corrola but i just like the way it looks and how it drives so i was like fuck it why not….
Toyota wins for reliability and performance, but they really do make weird decisions with their interiors.
Why on Earth would Toyota chince on the trunk space! Takes so many families out of contention.
You forgot to mention that the remote start feature is not free after three months and requires a subscription. That and the stupid shelf system is a deal breaker for me which is sad bc I am a big Toyota fan.
Great reivew. Really want to buy this car but the trunk.... what is going on....
I love the design but that trunk is redick. I’d also want to be able to sleep in the back w the seats down which clearly you can’t do.
If you want to travel as a family and not bring anything with you other than the cloths on your body then this is the vehicle for you!!!
This vehicle lost me with the lack of tilt and slide second row seats. If you can’t leave the car seats in place all while trying to access the third row then that SUV isn’t worth it at all.
Not usable third row and trunk... One should look for other full size SUV unless you only need 5 seats.
It looks so much bigger on the outside than the inside that’s what I don’t like. The same with the Highlander. Idk what Toyotas deal is with making the inside space so small
3rd and trunk space is way too small to be that price. It's non sense how these prices are hurting regular joe like me.
The constant finger pinching and stabbing of the hands at the camera while speaking is offputting.
Family friendly? Yes
Budget friendly? Uh…. Absolutely not lol
If you want Trunkspace with Third row get a Expedition or Suburban.
What a waste of leg room in that second row, and the seats can’t be moved that’s ridiculous!!!
Who can afford an $80k vehicle in this depressionary Obiden economy?
Heck, the 2003 Sequoia was smaller and had more space.
Get a Tundra crew cab. Great for 3 passengers In the backseat. More functionality than a Seqouia. Plus lots of space in the covered truck bed for hauling , groceries etc. We love it. I’ve got 3 year old twins and they can’t reach other and fight in the backseat. 😂. Dual front heated and cooled seats. Platinum 2023
Not many people wanna pay $80k for 1st gen v6 turbo truck
I am looking to trade my F250 crew for a Sequoia. When my three girls were small sitting three across was great. Now they are teens and tweens no one wants to sit in the middle for long car rides. ALWAYS a fight to get the window seats and complaining about one girl touching the other.
It’s beautiful but trunk killed it for me. I got a 2023 Expedition Max and love it. Replaced my odyssey van.
My family owns the Capstone Seqouia and we LOVE it!
How many kids do you have? I have 3 my youngest being 8 and the only one in a booster. I was wanting the sequoia with a bench seat!
2 teen boys and a 20 year old boy. It fits us very well.
@@AndrewWaston thanks so much!
I just got a sienna woodland edition.
Tons of space
Looked at one in OKC. The trunk was beyond disappointing. I wouldn’t be able to grocery shop let alone have 3 kids with an SUV like that. And it had a 98k price tag!
the san Francisco Bay Area the trd pro /capstone is makes up to $105k plus fees its a toyota might as well step up to lexus
Even a child has to feel claustrophobic sitting in the 3rd row
Is there a cheaper option 😮
the third row seating I believe was affected heavily by the hybrid powertrain as I think the battery had to be stored underneath. For me I really like the new Sequoia wish they kept the V8 but am looking at it as a new car for the wife. but will not be paying for the Platnium car is not worth that much especially with all those motorized bits like the steps easy to break when you overland.
Land cruiser is much more beautiful and this is no way near that
I saw a hybrid one these. $94,000. Total BS
I’ve got a 2019 Sequoia and looked at this specifically for your review. I hate the trunk on the 23. My 2019 folds flat and I feel like I have more room when the seats are up on my 2019. The trunk is a big negative for me. Thankfully I have teenagers (2) so it’s not a deal breaker for me.
The interior is complicated and it still doesn't work.
Looking forward to the grand highlander review🎉
Thanks WOW THAT'S AWESOME 👍✌️👌🎯👽😇💯
The side mirrors look to be installed from another truck.
Ummm that's screen is ridiculous 🤦♀️
toyota has the grand highlander for all the interior room it's basically the big family car and rhe seqouia is like the fun off road car for a family with older kids
Toyota needs to do better with interior layout and design.
I think she needs to move her hands more as she's talking.
The rear trunk space seems poorly designed.
The third row and “cargo” space is atrocious in this.