Object Relations Theory: Why we repeat the same toxic relationship patterns.

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 20 ก.ย. 2024
  • We discussed the main points of the Object Relations Theory, followed by a case study.
    The Object Relations Theory is a modern psychodynamic concept created collectively by various psychoanalysts, most notably Melanie Klein and Donald Winnicott. The theory places emphasis on how our relationship with our early caregivers creates a bedrock for our relationships later in life.
    This video was largely based on the book “Essential Psychodynamic Psychotherapy: An Acquired Art” by Teri Quatman ➭ amzn.to/3NyeS4o
    -
    Follow and subscribe to Good Enough Psychiatrist:
    / @goodenoughpsychiatrist
    / goodenoughpsychiatrist
    ► Book Recommendations
    All Titles ➭ amzn.to/3obaLRv
    Psychiatry/Therapy Books ➭ amzn.to/3Pk5weu
    ► Business Inquiries
    hello@goodenoughpsychiatrist.com
    Disclaimer:
    This video is for educational purposes and is not a substitute for professional advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We recommend consulting a licensed behavioral health provider before trying any of the strategies mentioned in our materials.
    #objectrelations #psychodynamic #psychology #psychoanalysis #freud #melanieklein #winnicott #psychiatry

ความคิดเห็น • 48

  • @goodenoughpsychiatrist
    @goodenoughpsychiatrist  2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Thank you for watching this video. If you liked this video, please let us know what you think and leave a comment below on topics you'd like us to cover in future videos.

  • @Labrigni
    @Labrigni 2 ปีที่แล้ว +37

    Thank you so much, I have read it in my textbook, attended the class lecture on it, and reviewed my professor's PowerPoint over and over. Because of you I FINALLY feel like I understand. It might be the culmination of all the studying but this is where the lightbulb lit

    • @goodenoughpsychiatrist
      @goodenoughpsychiatrist  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thank you for your feedback, Labrigni. We're always happy to hear that our content brings further clarification and understanding to our viewers. Thank you for supporting our channel!

    • @jessymanalu5
      @jessymanalu5 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I know right! my personality lecturer was very smart, but i still didn't get the point of Klein's theory😅

    • @imnina9086
      @imnina9086 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Hello what’s the name of the text book please?

  • @calistatermini5403
    @calistatermini5403 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I'm studying for my licensing exam and this video finally helped me to understand the fundamentals of Object Relations Therapy. If only you had more videos for the other psychological theories!

    • @goodenoughpsychiatrist
      @goodenoughpsychiatrist  หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@calistatermini5403 I am glad that it is helpful. Good luck with your exam.

  • @FriskyTendervittles
    @FriskyTendervittles ปีที่แล้ว +12

    If you don’t “gravitate” toward the familiar is possible you “create” the familiar? Like if in the example he had a good loving partner he felt anxious so he took steps to change the dynamic between the two of them to make it more familiar for him?

    • @sarahhajarbalqis
      @sarahhajarbalqis ปีที่แล้ว

      I appreciate this question. Curious for some answers too.

  • @ΚωνσταντινοςΚαραλης-ω8ψ
    @ΚωνσταντινοςΚαραλης-ω8ψ 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    So that would explain the rigid and strict way we interact with people-we,love people,but we hate some kind of people,although there is no real reason for it.

  • @stevensteinberg6206
    @stevensteinberg6206 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I'm teaching HS psychology and this is a clear and visual explanation THX

    • @bellakrinkle9381
      @bellakrinkle9381 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      PERFECT. ALL secondary schools ought to have mandatory psych classes.

  • @paxsophia2225
    @paxsophia2225 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you so much for this well-explained video. I could not wrap my mind around Object Relations theory in relation to the enneagram. This is helping me to understand it better along with its implications. Thanks so much!

  • @sarahhajarbalqis
    @sarahhajarbalqis ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thank you. This is certainly good enough. I have had trouble understanding the concept 'object' in this context.
    I hope to see more good enough videos from this channel.
    🇲🇾

  • @jaclynnward2858
    @jaclynnward2858 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Thank you for making this simple and informative

  • @Our_Patterns
    @Our_Patterns 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I love the name of this channel. Winnicott video next!

    • @goodenoughpsychiatrist
      @goodenoughpsychiatrist  5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thank you for stopping. Yes, a Winnoctt video is definitely in store in the future.

  • @michaelwolf2795
    @michaelwolf2795 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The quote by Dr.Bruce helped me thank you

    • @goodenoughpsychiatrist
      @goodenoughpsychiatrist  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Agreed - we're glad you also find it helpful. Thank you for supporting our channel!

    • @wizthem
      @wizthem 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Great video....but just for clarification, that quote about people who prefer the certainty of misery was actually NOT by Dr. Bruce Perry. Even in his book, he gives credit for that quote to someone else. I believe the original quote came from the late great family therapist Virginia Satir.

  • @altaaaaeee
    @altaaaaeee ปีที่แล้ว

    Certainly, this video help me to apply the theory in real life situation.

  • @sunitavishwakarma9086
    @sunitavishwakarma9086 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    hi , thanks for uploading very informative video

  • @wandawilliams6848
    @wandawilliams6848 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Very well explained. Thank you!

  • @aridivinity7123
    @aridivinity7123 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This video was amazing ! Thank you. Wish there were more.

  • @jasmines2328
    @jasmines2328 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you so much. I love the video. Great to the point explanation unlike the go around of the book.

  • @trocchiettoski
    @trocchiettoski ปีที่แล้ว +2

    fantastic video, fairbairn was genial

  • @shivantikauchiha1822
    @shivantikauchiha1822 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Very well explained

  • @malakhamadto
    @malakhamadto 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    thanks, you make it so simple

  • @loimagdaraog1481
    @loimagdaraog1481 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR THIS🥰

  • @echoes4679
    @echoes4679 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Would be interested to know how can that person change....now that the abusive pattern is gone, how healthy relationship will look like?

    • @goodenoughpsychiatrist
      @goodenoughpsychiatrist  2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      That is an excellent question. In my opinion, a healthy relationship is defined by what IS NOT rather than what IS. In other words, building a healthy relationship is a journey, not a destination. For instance, as you start noticing your current relationship pattern is not healthy, you may try to move away from that type of negative relationship pattern. Through this journey, you may continuously discover and update what you want in a "healthy" relationship.

  • @giticaravan7196
    @giticaravan7196 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you for such a great video!!

  • @tammyphan3260
    @tammyphan3260 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thank you for a great video!

  • @leojablonski2309
    @leojablonski2309 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Well done.

  • @safetifying
    @safetifying ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very good thank you 🙏

  • @ilikegeorgiabutiveonlybeen6705
    @ilikegeorgiabutiveonlybeen6705 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    but for real yeah can relate and hope to fix that

  • @macminator3000
    @macminator3000 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    5:29 wasn't it Virginia Satir that said this?

    • @wizthem
      @wizthem 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Yes, even in Dr. Bruce Perry's book, he gives credit to someone else for that quote. I think it was Virginia Satir.

  • @Naii_lah
    @Naii_lah ปีที่แล้ว

    great video!

  • @drm4819
    @drm4819 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I have been reviewing key psychodynamic theories and for some reason, this one just doesn't click..... I know this theory turns the single person psychology into a 2 person psychology focusing on relationships with "objects". But how does this differ from attachment theory? also, is the depressed position and paranoid schitzoid related to this? Thank!

    • @goodenoughpsychiatrist
      @goodenoughpsychiatrist  28 วันที่ผ่านมา

      my apologies for the late reply. I think similarly as you in that both object relations theory and attachment theory talk about interpsychic realm rather than intrapsychic. But, I do think they are distinct. Attachment theory adds a unique layer of biological drive infants have to attach to caregivers while object relations theory discusses the internalized representations of relational landscapes. Of course, the two theories complement each other. I hope it is helpful.

  • @deeptikheterpal8430
    @deeptikheterpal8430 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Awesome

  • @ogcastroneto1
    @ogcastroneto1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Do you know any books about this?

    • @goodenoughpsychiatrist
      @goodenoughpsychiatrist  2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Hello, there is no good book for the general public for the object relations theory. But, “Essential Psychodynamic Psychotherapy: An Acquired Art” by Teri Quatman is a great intro book for anyone interested in this type of therapy.

  • @ilikegeorgiabutiveonlybeen6705
    @ilikegeorgiabutiveonlybeen6705 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    damn thats some computer science