Professor Joseph is cautious in his comments about China. Real intentions of Xi Jinping is to keep India under pressure and make it feel inferior due to its economic and military power. Such pressures work more on the psyche of the leaders than in real way especially if your opponent is of unequal size. India as a nation has human resources and what it may lack in economic power, it makes up in its resolve with the current leadership. The mind game unleased by China has run its course and while India may not show or flex itself and make visible statements, it does not seem to be afraid of China any more. With passage of time maybe another 10 years, this will cease to be a threat as the economic and military imbalance will considerably get altered. By pushing India, China has accelerated our resolve in both these spheres and so we must really thank Chinese for forcing us in taking bold steps and pursue a course which will enable it to be counted as an equal power just like China and the USA in a decade.
@anil- as a Rule, a weak nation will become strong and vice versa! its some Laws of Natures. its a matter of identifiable time, before it is supersede by India, add ghee for power!
nah India's real intention is to stir up border conflicts and try to weaken China by siding with the US. Only after the US dollar decline did India change its tune and jump ship to BRICS. By pushing China and siding with the US, India has accelerated Chinese resolve as well.
And yet india continues to buy cheap Chinese goods so much so that the trade deficit is in excess of $100 billion dollars in China’s favor 😂 corporate greed on India’s part
India's mistake, as usual, is the deference and meekness that the leadership is always eager to show in order to "avoid trouble". If India were to turn the tables and suddenly claim parts of Tibet, Xinjiang and even reopen the Tibet question, we will see a different attitude from China. For example, India has far more claim based on ancient and modern history over Kailash-Mansarovar than China ever had or will have. Similarly, Hindu temples have been found in Xinjiang. Even the whole of China can be claimed based on the fact that there are many Buddhist and Hindu temples there, all of Indian origin. What will China do? Attack us?
The problem with your suggestion is India does not have a territorial dispute with China. They have one with us. Leaving out Aksai Chin for the moment. Tell me what reason we give if we do as you say, go and physically claim the parts you said. Or are you talking about just making claims and nothing more.
@@johndoe-vc1we He is not litreally saying he wants to invade China , he's just countering their idiotic reason of claming AP as a part of China based on heritage, with that logic India can claim half of the Asian continent and there is proper evidence to it, it's not like it's a made up history. But are we doing that!? No we are not, because we are not delusional or communist.
As you often do Nitin you ask interesting questions of interesting people and get interesting answers. Understanding is increased when we are exposed to a variety of POV. I agree with your guests opinion that Xi is both bold and cautious and also difficult to understand even for insiders of the CPC power structures.
@@johndoe-vc1we true and his eventual successor may be equally or more so enigmatic and volatile. All leaders need to be subject to our critical assessment.
@Ian- dude, War is serious affair, regarding lives and deaths of a nation, before the Chief resorts to its policies, evidently everyone has to mull over intently?
China has big appetite for indian land. Its strategy is to grab as much land as possible without large scale war . Although indians are saying there was peace at border for the last 40 years before the galwan clash , the chinese have salimi. Slicing indian border land continuously because not. Challenged by indian army at the border. The indian army is located far away from the LAC because of lack of infrastructure on indian side and only do foot patrol few times a year try to reach the LAC. Most of the time , the indian patrol who is Indo Tibetan Police is stopped by chinese army half way before reaching the LAC and sent back.
looks like you have been living under a rock, go watch videos on how India beats up chinese soldiers when they try to claim lands with sticks, its laughable. As for Salami slicing, they try too hard but Indian soldiers are present everywhere. infact they are scared we will try to capture their lands becoz we did the salami slicing. As for the infrastructure its increased tremendously. chinese soldiers can't operate properly in high altitude, they rotate every 48 hours, Indian soldiers stick around for weeks.
@@Red.bulldozer3 - ya, your brilliant ideas. might as well verbal fight to decide the winner! losing one's marbles to invent some nukes? add ghee to nukes?
@@Red.bulldozer3 -ya, if as you posit, there will be no more destitute nations in these World, why allocate 10% of one's GDP for military and defense budgets? add iron balls for powers?
For that matter, does it have with anyone? It's expansionist policy. China as a Civilization survived on Concept of Great Wall... on sound economics and industrial exports... was always scared and beaten by Tibetans or Mongolians etc... so, it's just psychology. Such nations always collapse due to their own insecurities. China will go Soviet Union way in less than a decade. Pointers are already there. Civilization wise, India is very very strong. China knows it. With new Bharat, India is slowly rising ... another decade , India will catch up...
@amar- this is your take? broach the subject of Caste system, communal disputes, sexism........they hamper India's progress, how long will it take for your Gov to resolve these issues b4 waging a War with its neighbours?
Of course, but there are covert ways to fight a war too. There's no reason why a pro-China democratically elected Taiwan government declares that it wants to be part of China. Everyone seems to have forgotten what happened in Hong Kong - how China effectively captured it and made it join the mainland, without sending any troops.
India has no weapons technology, imported all weapons worldwide, if India is in war with China, they will waiting the foreign weapons delivery every day same as ukraine today. China has a biggest industrial system, China can supply all the countries needs, such as the masks during the covid-19. India is a empty shell, under development, the Indians are the stupid, foolish nationalists, they only know to justify the UK colonialistes to declare every where is their territory, they have killed the whole royal family of Sikkim to occupy illegally this country.
Mr Joseph itne prabhavshali nahin rahe India China relationship ke bare mein Lekin Nitin aapke liye bahut se matter taiyar Hai American aur German defence minister ka India visit aur agale mahine Indian prime minister ka America Jana Nigahen rakhen aur conversation Karen shukriya Nitin ji
Chinese lived poor with no compromise attitude during Mao's time. The next generation of leaders was friendly and cooperative. Chinese economy flourished. Now Xi's Govt. went back to Mao. India fought 4 wars with Pakistan in its 75 yrs of independence. India and Pakistan fight to the death daily in Kashmir. This is THE TRAINING IN FIGHT TO DEATH, in freezing cold winters! India has 165 Nuclear bombs. 1.4 million armies prepared to die in a battle.
There is. Non-nuclear South Korea is fighting nuclear North Korea, which is totally dependent on China for almost everything. An all - out war with Japan is not beneficial for China or Japan, due to many reasons, so neither country pushes that boat much. Besides, Japan is still deeply ashamed of its war-mongering, colonial past to even contemplate a robust military policy for its own defence.
Japan and South Korea have US security umbrella -- so China has to resort to indirect conflict, through proxies like North Korea. How do you think backward isolated North Korea got its missiles and nukes? We all know who proliferated them. North Korea always acts up whenever China wants them to, giving them quiet green light.
China has a clash of interests with Japan and Korea in the East China Sea, to know more watch our explainer on the east china sea dispute- th-cam.com/video/CN9hr5C8eT4/w-d-xo.html
India must focus on Tibet, Southern Mongolia and East Turkestan. Like how a buffer zone, Mongolia exist between Russia and China, India also have to reinstate Tibet, between China and India. If India wants prosperity, internal stability and peace in the region, then India have to push mainland Chinese influence from its borders first, If India lose this tug of war, then India may have to pay a big price by losing control over the whole Himalayan belt, the entire North-Eastern India, and the future wars over the Tibet-origin rivers.
since the 1950th china offers to india a fixed border with aksai chin to china and arunachal to india. but india wants both. so who is not compromising.?
" It’s hard to overstate how little is known about how the Chinese system works; even if you are within the system, it is difficult to know what the top leader thinks, says Joseph Torigian, Assistant Professor at the School of International Service, American University, Washington, DC. " But.....he's an expert on China! Am I the only one to perceive a futility in this conversation?!
It means XJP is unpredictable and we have to keep our guard up for the extent he is in office. There are many reasons that can be given for no conflict but XJP is the wild card.
I am also tired of Chinese experts stating over and over again that they don't know how the Chinese system works or how Xi Jinping thinks! Come on, I am no China expert, but I can hazard an educated guess, on both these topics!
@@johndoe-vc1we It is the Chinese system that is unpredictable; not just XJP. The rest of the world or atleast Asia.....ok, let's narrow it down to India; needs to move from keeping up the guard to putting China on the defensive and eventually defanging it, first economically and later militarily.
@@vsr3777 -its just a caricature, the host augments the issue, for her own agendas, like evoking nationalism, click-baits...... only she knows the playbook!
The US is more interested in having strategic partnership with India as seen by formation of QUAD & recent offer to include India in the NATO plus. But strategic interests succeed only when economic interests are equally rapidly synchronized. Of China’s average annual trade surplus of about $600Bn during past 5 yrs, the US alone contributes about 2/3 while trade surplus from India fills nearly 1/3 of the remaining part of the Communist dollar belly & yet Chinese Communists have been hostile to both big democracies. The US-China trade is non-complementary & one-sided making US vulnerable to Chinese blackmail. US tariff-imposed Chinese goods include apparel, home linen. leather goods, shoes, luggage, TVs, refrigerators, washing machines, electrical goods, auto parts, furniture, chemicals, pharmaceuticals, kitchen & table ware, crockery, cutlery, stationery, carpets etc. Many of these items can be easily exported by India to the US. US India trade can be very complementary & balanced. India can easily balance it against imports of advanced defense equipment. Production of GE414 engines in India can help India's Tejas MK2. The US F18 naval variant which also uses this engine is being considered for Indian Navy while GE414 can help in India's planned Gen.5 production giving advantage of cost effective maintenance support to all the three variants. During WW2, Indian domestic manufacture had tremendously helped Allied force in Africa & Far East, the Vultee A-31 Vengeance bomber of US was manufactured in India. It also served Australian Air Force. Manufacture of identical equipment in a major defense partner is very helpful during crisis.
There is a big difference between being equals and not just a vassal country that is told to do what they are told to do. A lot of Indians are happy being a vassal country and not seen as an equal.
@@cmartinmnl Containment of China by the US also means strengthening India economically & Indian industries should be facilitated to replace hundreds of Chinese products exported to the US reducing near fatal dependence of US on Chinese goods which has forced Biden to sheepishly convert original US intent of De-linking from China to now De-risking from China. Two QUAD countries Australia & Japan are linked through bilateral security treaties with the US. India stands out as an independent nuclear weapons power with large military that does not need the US treaty of mutual defense but can provide vital support as strategic QUAD partner to the US & other QUAD countries. India will remain an independent country & not a vassal Country as evidenced by India's purchase of Russian S-400 anti-missile system & large quantities of Russian Crude despite Western concerns. Russia, in contrast to the US, provides India with the high-leverage strategic technologies & has pursued the co-development & coproduction of advanced weapons systems to include their manufacturing in India as also their exports from India. Russia does not burden India with end-user constraints, thus making India’s defense relationship with Moscow very valuable. Ukraine War has shown high probability of protracted wars & importance of friend-shoring & joint production to maintain continuous uninterrupted supply.
I think the professor is overthinking and over analyzing the political landscape of China. As far as Xi and top CCP officials are concerned, there is no contradiction at all in many of the subjects the professor mentioned. For example, regarding India, the prevailing attitude within the CCP and the general public of China is that China is superior, economically, technologically, militarily and culturally. As such, there is reason to compromise with someone to whom they despise. It's not a shrewd strategy based on rational calculation, it's just pure ultra nationalistic superiority complex that blinds the eyes of Xi and his eunuchs. The reality for most people within the PRoC and all CCP members and officials only recognize power or money, that's the most single important factor when trying to understand and dealing with Xi and CCP. Also, the CCP since its founding has been good with one thing, LIE. They see no shame of outright lies, implied lies, falsification of facts, covered ups...as long as they can achieve what they want. The recent blatant lie about when and where COVID 19 was first discovered, the fatality rate in China illustrates how little regard the CCP has towards facts.
Today in the Shangri-La dialogue held yearly in Singapore, Chinese military also refused to hold talks with the United States they have become belligerent to a very large extent if their is military conflict United States will deploy their NATO counterparts to help them out and bring india into the alliance because they will not win without logistical support and militarily backed assets deployed from Indian soil
Indians really need to accept that China is a peer to America now. That says a lot. The day India tries to be a peer competitor to the Americans that’s when they will support whoever lays claim to whatever part of India … even Pakistan. It’s in America’s interest right now to “use” India to counterbalance China….not support India mind you but “use”… so the hysteria is not so much in China since they know India is leaps and bounds behind China. India is a very rich country with its size both with its populous and diversity but it has a horrible industrial policy that is keeping it behind ….when they wake up to that, maybe they can grow their economy faster. Take an example of decoupling or derisking from China that the west is trying to champion …you would think India just like China would have been the natural choice but the realities are that …Vietnam, Indonesia, Thailand or Malaysia are all just right there with the capabilities hence India can’t benefit as much as it would have say 10 years ago…. If the industrial policy had shifted back then that is. Otherwise you will hear this story play out over and over how China is the boogeyman now for awhile until when it’s widely accepted there is no way back from what’s happening now….and that’s the global south realizing they have been on the sidelines for a long time ….the less the dollar is used in international trade the more the US weakens
Incorrect. China is not a peer to America, even economically (militarily it is an impossibility for now). Both are in the same boat - that is all. When that boat sinks, you will see what happens to both of them. It will be an interesting time then. Don’t trust the fake Chinese numbers they show you - you don’t know what cancer is eating into Chinese economy at the gut. China will be toast before USA is. USA is going to explode, but China is going to implode. And then they will all the wrong moves, and kaboom ! The only thing that works for China yet, is : 1) reverse engineering 2) cyber-theft, IP theft, and cyber-money heists. These are the most important things that the world must learn to handle wrt China right now.
India never learns. In 1962, belligerent and confident India thought China had no choice but to compromise since China had food shortage problems at home, and was hostile to both united snakes and Soviet Union, facing the Indian aggression, the so-called foward policy of nehru. India was wrong, China crashed India in a month against all odds. China has red lines, Don't cross them, because if you do, China will teach you a lesson.
China started invading indian teritories laying claim to what wasnt its territory the people belonging to that territory were not han chinese neither did they understand cantonese or mandarin, only fault of india was it didnt anticipate that China will invade one day , nehru was too relaxed because india didnt oppose Chinas invasion of tibet he though india would be fine what he didnt expect was China would stab him in the back and even india can become tibet one day if they didnt imporve the military fast enough, it was a lesson learner similar tactic was used again by China in 1967 fortunately the india government had caught up with the chinese tactic by then
India’s attitude towards Tibet - China conflict is too over cautious and should show more guts to tell the truth about India Tibet relations prior to the Chinese occupation of Tibet in 1950. Secondly it is wrong and it is against the international law to deal on lands that are under occupation and belong to a third country. India should respect and honour the McMohan line in Arunachal Pradesh which was signed between Tibet and British India. There were no Indo-China Border before 1950.
@@vsr3777 A well paid wumao of the CCP. Even India was ruled by the british the India had its border with Tibet. China too was ruled by foreigners like Mongols, Manchus, British and Japan for hundreds of years until the fall of Manchus. Tibet was a sovereign nation with its own National Flag, currency, postal system and distinct culture and religion. Tibet was much closer to India than China because our religion and script came from India and not from China. The only treaty Tibet had with China was the seventeen point agreement of 1951 which was forced on the Tibetan government under duress after the CCP’s illegal occupation. Our government exist and functions under a democratic system in exile and we are here to fight on with brutal illegal Chinese occupiers. Tibet-China conflict is still not resolved and China is suffering and falling back economically and politically under the Xitler Jinping’s 3rd Term. You dude have no knowledge of the border between Tibet and India. The famous McMohan border agreement between Tibet and British India was signed in 1914 and it stand to this day, only greedy China wants part of Arunachal. No way, if you really want you got to fight for it with the India army and the Tibetan SFF(Special Frontier Force) Battalion.
@@vsr3777 similar can be said for China there was no China before the british, there was a bunch of different han ethnicity empires who sometimes had tibet sometimes didnt hell even the mongolians nomads ruled todays China at one time, wonder if they will lay claim to China and declare it mongolia
@@vsr3777 I believe that Tibet needs to be an Independent country again as it was in 1948. I also believe that Taiwan is an independent country. There is no one China, it’s just the remnants of the Imperial Manchu Qing Dynasty.
Nitinji, if these are options, which seems better one for a/any Chinese leader: 1. Taken on Taiwan and some parts of Indian territory one go (because he created sufficient cushion countries on both sides) 2. First only fight America and take Taiwan in immediate term and put India in pressure for now (since he already gained some land in last 2/3 years), and take on India's Arunachal 4/5 years later 3. First take on India's Arunachal immediate term (who have very few allies that can help India quickly), while just keeping USA busy and in pressure on its east, and build more capabilities for few more years to take on USA, Japan, etc later.
China will be in rags and beaten beyond recognition if it goes to war with Taiwan or India. China isn't strong enough to indulge in brinkmanship; will simply be smothered to the ground.
@Ranga- lose your marbles? portraying China as an aggressor? bereft of US meddling, China doesn't even have to worry the reunification process, the devil is US! why fantasizes China as an aggressor? haha, it is more dovish than you posit!! the border disputes are being created by UK colonial Legacy and the dubbed Dalai Lama seeking asylum in your Delhi! is he such sanctimonious, as to kiss the kid openly?
Twice China offered india to settled border disbute, India refused to talk twice. By the way China settle border disbute with every neighbor except India and India controlled bhutan
We have to focus on our economy now . Once we reach top then free tibe. Now entering war means stupid we have to preserve ours Border should be protected
![เปิดใจ “ต้นหอม ศกุนตลา” หลังโดนพาดพิงธุรกิจที่เคยทำ และผลกระทบทำถูกปลดฟ้าผ่า! | แฉ 24 ต.ค.67 [2/3]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/vCi5OIqlxaE/mqdefault.jpg)
Professor Joseph is cautious in his comments about China. Real intentions of Xi Jinping is to keep India under pressure and make it feel inferior due to its economic and military power. Such pressures work more on the psyche of the leaders than in real way especially if your opponent is of unequal size. India as a nation has human resources and what it may lack in economic power, it makes up in its resolve with the current leadership. The mind game unleased by China has run its course and while India may not show or flex itself and make visible statements, it does not seem to be afraid of China any more. With passage of time maybe another 10 years, this will cease to be a threat as the economic and military imbalance will considerably get altered. By pushing India, China has accelerated our resolve in both these spheres and so we must really thank Chinese for forcing us in taking bold steps and pursue a course which will enable it to be counted as an equal power just like China and the USA in a decade.
@anil- as a Rule, a weak nation will become strong and vice versa!
its some Laws of Natures.
its a matter of identifiable time, before it is supersede by India,
add ghee for power!
Until the Chinese saw the Sepoys, they always thot that India was heaven.
Their name for India is heaven.
@@soonpohtay4794 -look like sarcastic irony to me, Sir!
seemingly have you confused Hell and Heaven in this aspect?
@@soonpohtay4794 -bizarre outreach?
enumerate?
nah India's real intention is to stir up border conflicts and try to weaken China by siding with the US. Only after the US dollar decline did India change its tune and jump ship to BRICS. By pushing China and siding with the US, India has accelerated Chinese resolve as well.
"Chinese dont give discounts, Indians dont buy without discounts" to paraphrase Russell Peters...
The world is slave to dollar, be it americans or the chinese. You know who doesn't drool for dollars, Indians.
And yet india continues to buy cheap Chinese goods so much so that the trade deficit is in excess of $100 billion dollars in China’s favor 😂 corporate greed on India’s part
Good. India will be prepared.
India's mistake, as usual, is the deference and meekness that the leadership is always eager to show in order to "avoid trouble". If India were to turn the tables and suddenly claim parts of Tibet, Xinjiang and even reopen the Tibet question, we will see a different attitude from China. For example, India has far more claim based on ancient and modern history over Kailash-Mansarovar than China ever had or will have. Similarly, Hindu temples have been found in Xinjiang. Even the whole of China can be claimed based on the fact that there are many Buddhist and Hindu temples there, all of Indian origin. What will China do? Attack us?
The problem with your suggestion is India does not have a territorial dispute with China. They have one with us. Leaving out Aksai Chin for the moment. Tell me what reason we give if we do as you say, go and physically claim the parts you said. Or are you talking about just making claims and nothing more.
@@johndoe-vc1we He is not litreally saying he wants to invade China , he's just countering their idiotic reason of claming AP as a part of China based on heritage, with that logic India can claim half of the Asian continent and there is proper evidence to it, it's not like it's a made up history. But are we doing that!? No we are not, because we are not delusional or communist.
This will all happen over a period of time when india has too many weapons to counter China...
India after so many years of slavery have totally became weak... yes true.. always reactive and always trying to avoid a conflict. ..
You're such a weasel. This is not a Rambo movie. What do you think this is?
As you often do Nitin you ask interesting questions of interesting people and get interesting answers. Understanding is increased when we are exposed to a variety of POV.
I agree with your guests opinion that Xi is both bold and cautious and also difficult to understand even for insiders of the CPC power structures.
Which makes him unpredictable. So we have to be on our guard for the extent he is in charge
@@johndoe-vc1we true and his eventual successor may be equally or more so enigmatic and volatile. All leaders need to be subject to our critical assessment.
@Ian- dude, War is serious affair, regarding lives and deaths of a nation,
before the Chief resorts to its policies, evidently everyone has to mull over intently?
Super!
You guys always get the best guests.
Superb interview and superb production values.
Thanks for listening
As usual very informative. Thanks Nitin🙏🙏
China has big appetite for indian land. Its strategy is to grab as much land as possible without large scale war .
Although indians are saying there was peace at border for the last 40 years before the galwan clash , the chinese have salimi. Slicing indian border land continuously because not. Challenged by indian army at the border.
The indian army is located far away from the LAC because of lack of infrastructure on indian side and only do foot patrol few times a year try to reach the LAC.
Most of the time , the indian patrol who is Indo Tibetan Police is stopped by chinese army half way before reaching the LAC and sent back.
@mister- if really so pugnacious , strengthen your military budgets, elect a hawkish PM and generals,
you reckon its a good ideas?
add ghee!
looks like you have been living under a rock, go watch videos on how India beats up chinese soldiers when they try to claim lands with sticks, its laughable. As for Salami slicing, they try too hard but Indian soldiers are present everywhere. infact they are scared we will try to capture their lands becoz we did the salami slicing. As for the infrastructure its increased tremendously. chinese soldiers can't operate properly in high altitude, they rotate every 48 hours, Indian soldiers stick around for weeks.
@@ngkeam9491 I think indian army should be equipped with enough spikes, spears, bow and arrows instead of fighting bare hands with chinese 🤣
@@Red.bulldozer3 - ya, your brilliant ideas.
might as well verbal fight to decide the winner!
losing one's marbles to invent some nukes?
add ghee to nukes?
@@Red.bulldozer3 -ya, if as you posit, there will be no more destitute nations in these World,
why allocate 10% of one's GDP for military and defense budgets?
add iron balls for powers?
Awesome analysis 💯
The public has the right to believe that he is missing in action
Thank you!
For that matter, does it have with anyone? It's expansionist policy. China as a Civilization survived on Concept of Great Wall... on sound economics and industrial exports... was always scared and beaten by Tibetans or Mongolians etc... so, it's just psychology. Such nations always collapse due to their own insecurities. China will go Soviet Union way in less than a decade. Pointers are already there.
Civilization wise, India is very very strong. China knows it. With new Bharat, India is slowly rising ... another decade , India will catch up...
@amar- this is your take?
broach the subject of Caste system, communal disputes, sexism........they hamper India's progress, how long will it take for your Gov to resolve these issues b4 waging a War with its neighbours?
Typical indian mindset with full of self confidence but with no knowledge of what’s going outside India
Meanwhile India survived on the concept of holy Kaaw dung. No one cares about slumdog civiliazation of failure.
forget tibet, no chance for any country other than china. the fact that tibetan love
communist very much, no tibetan want to go back serfdom.
@@josephguo3429 -plausibly.
Dalai Lama practices serfdom, his wealth and riches is absolute!
even Tibet pales in comparison and significance!
Interesting. Thanks
China definitely learnt their lessons from Russia Ukraine war and know dire consequences war can bring to them either with India or Taiwan
Of course, but there are covert ways to fight a war too. There's no reason why a pro-China democratically elected Taiwan government declares that it wants to be part of China. Everyone seems to have forgotten what happened in Hong Kong - how China effectively captured it and made it join the mainland, without sending any troops.
Taiwan yes but not India, no Chinese is interested in India.
Everybody in China know it's the Nuclear Vely Strong Super Powder of the World INDIA.....a lot of TALKINGS. 😁😁
@Srinu Not gonna happen when there are satellites tracking every move of the chinese.
India has no weapons technology, imported all weapons worldwide, if India is in war with China, they will waiting the foreign weapons delivery every day same as ukraine today.
China has a biggest industrial system, China can supply all the countries needs, such as the masks during the covid-19.
India is a empty shell, under development, the Indians are the stupid, foolish nationalists, they only know to justify the UK colonialistes to declare every where is their territory, they have killed the whole royal family of Sikkim to occupy illegally this country.
Chinese are right in their assessment, don't disagree with them.
Mr Joseph itne prabhavshali nahin rahe India China relationship ke bare mein
Lekin Nitin aapke liye bahut se matter taiyar Hai American aur German defence minister ka India visit aur agale mahine Indian prime minister ka America Jana
Nigahen rakhen aur conversation Karen shukriya Nitin ji
Chinese lived poor with no compromise attitude during Mao's time. The next generation of leaders was friendly and cooperative. Chinese economy flourished. Now Xi's Govt. went back to Mao.
India fought 4 wars with Pakistan in its 75 yrs of independence. India and Pakistan fight to the death daily in Kashmir. This is THE TRAINING IN FIGHT TO DEATH, in freezing cold winters!
India has 165 Nuclear bombs. 1.4 million armies prepared to die in a battle.
❤
Neither does India.
Why there's no flaring conflict between China and Japan or South Korea?
Because China thinks it can take both by their ass. Also, it doesn't want direct conflict yet.
There is. Non-nuclear South Korea is fighting nuclear North Korea, which is totally dependent on China for almost everything. An all - out war with Japan is not beneficial for China or Japan, due to many reasons, so neither country pushes that boat much. Besides, Japan is still deeply ashamed of its war-mongering, colonial past to even contemplate a robust military policy for its own defence.
Japan and South Korea have US security umbrella -- so China has to resort to indirect conflict, through proxies like North Korea. How do you think backward isolated North Korea got its missiles and nukes? We all know who proliferated them. North Korea always acts up whenever China wants them to, giving them quiet green light.
what do you think china is building for? its the humiliation it faced against japan. 100 years of humiliation.
China has a clash of interests with Japan and Korea in the East China Sea, to know more watch our explainer on the east china sea dispute- th-cam.com/video/CN9hr5C8eT4/w-d-xo.html
🙏
India must focus on Tibet, Southern Mongolia and East Turkestan.
Like how a buffer zone, Mongolia exist between Russia and China, India also have to reinstate Tibet, between China and India.
If India wants prosperity, internal stability and peace in the region, then India have to push mainland Chinese influence from its borders first, If India lose this tug of war, then India may have to pay a big price by losing control over the whole Himalayan belt, the entire North-Eastern India, and the future wars over the Tibet-origin rivers.
Let's cancel one China policy to dustbin
since the 1950th china offers to india a fixed border with aksai chin to china and arunachal to india. but india wants both. so who is not compromising.?
How about Aksai Chin to China, and Tibet to India ? Now… will China ask for both as well ? Or will it compromise ?
smash one China Policy smash Panchsheel
@Strat- on the contrary, India has worse appetite to renegotiate its conflicts with China!
walk the talk is the best option?
नितीन सर एक व्हिडिओ करंट बॉर्डर स्टेट ऑन ईस्टर्न फ्रन्ट प्लिज
Thank you for your suggestion, meanwhile do consider watching our series of reporting from northeast- th-cam.com/video/BFrTU3bhLlw/w-d-xo.html
@@StratNewsGlobal very informative coverage of this front 🙏👍
" It’s hard to overstate how little is known about how the Chinese system works; even if you are within the system, it is difficult to know what the top leader thinks, says Joseph Torigian, Assistant Professor at the School of International Service, American University, Washington, DC. "
But.....he's an expert on China!
Am I the only one to perceive a futility in this conversation?!
It means XJP is unpredictable and we have to keep our guard up for the extent he is in office. There are many reasons that can be given for no conflict but XJP is the wild card.
I am also tired of Chinese experts stating over and over again that they don't know how the Chinese system works or how Xi Jinping thinks! Come on, I am no China expert, but I can hazard an educated guess, on both these topics!
@@johndoe-vc1we It is the Chinese system that is unpredictable; not just XJP. The rest of the world or atleast Asia.....ok, let's narrow it down to India; needs to move from keeping up the guard to putting China on the defensive and eventually defanging it, first economically and later militarily.
@vchitan- that is entitled flexibility and adaptability!
at least China is willing to acclimatize?
haha, you outsmart everyone!
@@vsr3777 -its just a caricature,
the host augments the issue, for her own agendas, like evoking nationalism, click-baits......
only she knows the playbook!
I hope India liberate Tibet and other provinces and goes within China wall limit.
The US is more interested in having strategic partnership with India as seen by formation of QUAD & recent offer to include India in the NATO plus. But strategic interests succeed only when economic interests are equally rapidly synchronized.
Of China’s average annual trade surplus of about $600Bn during past 5 yrs, the US alone contributes about 2/3 while trade surplus from India fills nearly 1/3 of the remaining part of the Communist dollar belly & yet Chinese Communists have been hostile to both big democracies.
The US-China trade is non-complementary & one-sided making US vulnerable to Chinese blackmail. US tariff-imposed Chinese goods include apparel, home linen. leather goods, shoes, luggage, TVs, refrigerators, washing machines, electrical goods, auto parts, furniture, chemicals, pharmaceuticals, kitchen & table ware, crockery, cutlery, stationery, carpets etc. Many of these items can be easily exported by India to the US.
US India trade can be very complementary & balanced. India can easily balance it against imports of advanced defense equipment. Production of GE414 engines in India can help India's Tejas MK2. The US F18 naval variant which also uses this engine is being considered for Indian Navy while GE414 can help in India's planned Gen.5 production giving advantage of cost effective maintenance support to all the three variants.
During WW2, Indian domestic manufacture had tremendously helped Allied force in Africa & Far East, the Vultee A-31 Vengeance bomber of US was manufactured in India. It also served Australian Air Force. Manufacture of identical equipment in a major defense partner is very helpful during crisis.
There is a big difference between being equals and not just a vassal country that is told to do what they are told to do. A lot of Indians are happy being a vassal country and not seen as an equal.
@@cmartinmnl Containment of China by the US also means strengthening India economically & Indian industries should be facilitated to replace hundreds of Chinese products exported to the US reducing near fatal dependence of US on Chinese goods which has forced Biden to sheepishly convert original US intent of De-linking from China to now De-risking from China.
Two QUAD countries Australia & Japan are linked through bilateral security treaties with the US. India stands out as an independent nuclear weapons power with large military that does not need the US treaty of mutual defense but can provide vital support as strategic QUAD partner to the US & other QUAD countries.
India will remain an independent country & not a vassal Country as evidenced by India's purchase of Russian S-400 anti-missile system & large quantities of Russian Crude despite Western concerns.
Russia, in contrast to the US, provides India with the high-leverage strategic technologies & has pursued the co-development & coproduction of advanced weapons systems to include their manufacturing in India as also their exports from India. Russia does not burden India with end-user constraints, thus making India’s defense relationship with Moscow very valuable.
Ukraine War has shown high probability of protracted wars & importance of friend-shoring & joint production to maintain continuous uninterrupted supply.
I think the professor is overthinking and over analyzing the political landscape of China. As far as Xi and top CCP officials are concerned, there is no contradiction at all in many of the subjects the professor mentioned.
For example, regarding India, the prevailing attitude within the CCP and the general public of China is that China is superior, economically, technologically, militarily and culturally. As such, there is reason to compromise with someone to whom they despise. It's not a shrewd strategy based on rational calculation, it's just pure ultra nationalistic superiority complex that blinds the eyes of Xi and his eunuchs. The reality for most people within the PRoC and all CCP members and officials only recognize power or money, that's the most single important factor when trying to understand and dealing with Xi and CCP.
Also, the CCP since its founding has been good with one thing, LIE. They see no shame of outright lies, implied lies, falsification of facts, covered ups...as long as they can achieve what they want. The recent blatant lie about when and where COVID 19 was first discovered, the fatality rate in China illustrates how little regard the CCP has towards facts.
As a woke Indian guy I support zelensky 😌
Today in the Shangri-La dialogue held yearly in Singapore, Chinese military also refused to hold talks with the United States they have become belligerent to a very large extent if their is military conflict United States will deploy their NATO counterparts to help them out and bring india into the alliance because they will not win without logistical support and militarily backed assets deployed from Indian soil
The quicker US realises this and values India for what it is, the better. Reduces the costs for US, india has little to gain there anyway.
Indians really need to accept that China is a peer to America now. That says a lot. The day India tries to be a peer competitor to the Americans that’s when they will support whoever lays claim to whatever part of India … even Pakistan. It’s in America’s interest right now to “use” India to counterbalance China….not support India mind you but “use”… so the hysteria is not so much in China since they know India is leaps and bounds behind China. India is a very rich country with its size both with its populous and diversity but it has a horrible industrial policy that is keeping it behind ….when they wake up to that, maybe they can grow their economy faster. Take an example of decoupling or derisking from China that the west is trying to champion …you would think India just like China would have been the natural choice but the realities are that …Vietnam, Indonesia, Thailand or Malaysia are all just right there with the capabilities hence India can’t benefit as much as it would have say 10 years ago…. If the industrial policy had shifted back then that is. Otherwise you will hear this story play out over and over how China is the boogeyman now for awhile until when it’s widely accepted there is no way back from what’s happening now….and that’s the global south realizing they have been on the sidelines for a long time ….the less the dollar is used in international trade the more the US weakens
Incorrect. China is not a peer to America, even economically (militarily it is an impossibility for now). Both are in the same boat - that is all. When that boat sinks, you will see what happens to both of them. It will be an interesting time then.
Don’t trust the fake Chinese numbers they show you - you don’t know what cancer is eating into Chinese economy at the gut. China will be toast before USA is. USA is going to explode, but China is going to implode. And then they will all the wrong moves, and kaboom !
The only thing that works for China yet, is :
1) reverse engineering
2) cyber-theft, IP theft, and cyber-money heists. These are the most important things that the world must learn to handle wrt China right now.
India never learns. In 1962, belligerent and confident India thought China had no choice but to compromise since China had food shortage problems at home, and was hostile to both united snakes and Soviet Union, facing the Indian aggression, the so-called foward policy of nehru. India was wrong, China crashed India in a month against all odds. China has red lines, Don't cross them, because if you do, China will teach you a lesson.
China started invading indian teritories laying claim to what wasnt its territory the people belonging to that territory were not han chinese neither did they understand cantonese or mandarin, only fault of india was it didnt anticipate that China will invade one day , nehru was too relaxed because india didnt oppose Chinas invasion of tibet he though india would be fine what he didnt expect was China would stab him in the back and even india can become tibet one day if they didnt imporve the military fast enough, it was a lesson learner similar tactic was used again by China in 1967 fortunately the india government had caught up with the chinese tactic by then
Don't mess with nuclear country
CIA speak😉
India’s attitude towards Tibet - China conflict is too over cautious and should show more guts to tell the truth about India Tibet relations prior to the Chinese occupation of Tibet in 1950. Secondly it is wrong and it is against the international law to deal on lands that are under occupation and belong to a third country. India should respect and honour the McMohan line in Arunachal Pradesh which was signed between Tibet and British India. There were no Indo-China Border before 1950.
@@vsr3777 A well paid wumao of the CCP. Even India was ruled by the british the India had its border with Tibet. China too was ruled by foreigners like Mongols, Manchus, British and Japan for hundreds of years until the fall of Manchus. Tibet was a sovereign nation with its own National Flag, currency, postal system and distinct culture and religion. Tibet was much closer to India than China because our religion and script came from India and not from China.
The only treaty Tibet had with China was the seventeen point agreement of 1951 which was forced on the Tibetan government under
duress after the CCP’s illegal occupation. Our government exist and functions under a democratic system in exile and we are here to fight on with brutal illegal Chinese occupiers. Tibet-China conflict is still not resolved and China is suffering and falling back economically and politically under the Xitler Jinping’s 3rd Term. You dude have no knowledge of the border between Tibet and India. The famous McMohan border agreement between Tibet and British India was signed in 1914 and it stand to this day, only greedy China wants part of Arunachal. No way, if you really want you got to fight for it with the India army and the Tibetan SFF(Special Frontier Force) Battalion.
@@vsr3777 similar can be said for China there was no China before the british, there was a bunch of different han ethnicity empires who sometimes had tibet sometimes didnt hell even the mongolians nomads ruled todays China at one time, wonder if they will lay claim to China and declare it mongolia
There was no PRC before 1968, till then only RoC existed. Check the UN records. Butt hurt ?
@@vsr3777 I believe that Tibet needs to be an Independent country again as it was in 1948. I also believe that Taiwan is an independent country. There is no one China, it’s just the remnants of the Imperial Manchu Qing Dynasty.
Nitinji, if these are options, which seems better one for a/any Chinese leader:
1. Taken on Taiwan and some parts of Indian territory one go (because he created sufficient cushion countries on both sides)
2. First only fight America and take Taiwan in immediate term and put India in pressure for now (since he already gained some land in last 2/3 years), and take on India's Arunachal 4/5 years later
3. First take on India's Arunachal immediate term (who have very few allies that can help India quickly), while just keeping USA busy and in pressure on its east, and build more capabilities for few more years to take on USA, Japan, etc later.
China will be in rags and beaten beyond recognition if it goes to war with Taiwan or India. China isn't strong enough to indulge in brinkmanship; will simply be smothered to the ground.
@Ranga- lose your marbles?
portraying China as an aggressor? bereft of US meddling, China doesn't even have to worry the reunification process, the devil is US!
why fantasizes China as an aggressor? haha, it is more dovish than you posit!!
the border disputes are being created by UK colonial Legacy and the dubbed Dalai Lama seeking asylum in your Delhi!
is he such sanctimonious, as to kiss the kid openly?
😂😂😂😂😂,4th option go down to stone age
Twice China offered india to settled border disbute, India refused to talk twice. By the way China settle border disbute with every neighbor except India and India controlled bhutan
brainwashed Chinese .. after invading Tibet .. now china have border disputes with all of their neighbours .. except Pakistan
Nice chingping bot talking 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
The offer is gone a few years ago.
Ke Li what did you smoke?😶
War is inveitable between India and China so india prepare hard and increase nuclear weapons more than 1000
India also does not have appetite to solve the boarder issue with neighbouring countries. Look your face in the mirror.
Yup, we don't. Now go cry.
Its actually chinese bot with indian name...u can recognize them easily 😂😂😂
@@mausampanchal might not be, but I still want him to cry! 😭
Bot we know your tricks😂😂
Ma Tara , we are not crying but actually you are crying!
India?
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Where is your bridge?
Inside your mom
We have to focus on our economy now . Once we reach top then free tibe.
Now entering war means stupid we have to preserve ours
Border should be protected