Yeah, all he kept saying was that it was implicit lol. Although Pope Leo didn’t enforce Vatican 1 or Papal Infallibility, he COULD have if he wanted to
Erick cannot be that dumb. He isn’t. I think you can see the tension and cog-dis within him. He desperately wants the entire mythology and Grand Narrative of Rome, from its glorious Pagan Empire days up to now, to be true, real, and the Story of all Stories. It is that desperate desire (psychological need?) for the Grand Narrative of Rome (see: drama, worldly glory and dominance, power, superiority) to be true that keeps highly intelligent Papists hanging on tightly to an obvious pack of lies.l and clear contradictions. Those still hanging on at this point in information history will not let go easily. It is a deeply spiritual issue, not an intellectual or intelligence problem.
This is the first time I came to jays channel after watching him in a debate with Sam...He was so clean cut and chill I never expected him to break out the song and dance!😂😂😂 For sure new subscriber
I don't follow him, Carson that is.I watch him sometimes though. Must we follow people? But the Sumerian stories are older. And clearly, the template for Genesis, including the Noah/Utnapishtim story. This seems like fake drama
@@oliveeisner8964the Bible doesn't claim to be the first telling of the story, it implies everyone knows what happened, it claims to be the truth about what happened.
if the Pope is the foundation and guardian of Faith how did the Orthodox maintain perfect continuity in traditions and doctrine for 1000 years? and why the catholics failed miserably in this in the past 70 years?
As someone seeking between Roman Catholicism and Eastern Orthodoxy, it’s not looking good for Roman Catholicism. Even if I can admire good aspects of what the Roman Catholic Church has produced, I’m not seeing a way out for it in relation to being True.
I saw a conversation between Ubi and Suan Somma a while ago that was quite good. One thing Ubi said which struck me is that he thinks the degradation of Catholicisim is a bad thing and wants to see it restored (in truth of course, which means renouncing the heresies), as opposed to Protestantism which he said needs to die. I saw an admiration for those good aspects you mentioned and a lament that they are weakening, while still holding fitm that Catholicism is in error.
Pope Silverius ( 536-537) was deposed by political maneuvering during the reign of the Byzantine Emperor Justinian and Empress Theodora, largely due to accusations of collaborating with the Goths. Vigilius, supported by Theodora, became pope under highly questionable circumstances, with the emperor's backing. This was a political, not ecclesiastical, appointment ,Vigilius later condemned and anathematized Silverius, accusing him of heresy and treason ,Roman Catholic teaching asserts that no one can judge the pope (Prima Sedes a nemine judicatur), as stated in canon law and reinforced by the First Vatican Council (1870) Pope Vigilius, in condemning Silverius, directly contradicted this principle. If a pope can judge and condemn another pope, it undermines claims of an unbroken and supreme papal authority which raises the question: who has the authority to determine if a pope is legitimate or if his teachings or actions are heretical? If Pope Vigilius was correct in judging Silverius, this implies that popes can be deposed or declared illegitimate, which contradicts the notion of papal indefectibility ,Conversely, if Vigilius was wrong, then his own legitimacy as pope is called into question, creating a paradox for claims of an unbroken papal office)
He's literally the trad chad family man all the tradcats claim to want in this country, then throughout the whole stream they were making fun of his face and voice calling him an incel or hipster just because he's standing up to their stupid cult. Nevermind fradds mods being totally one sided, make a fat joke about ybarra and it's instant ban but make all the jokes about any of the Orthodox you want.
@@Desertfox-o2xI haven’t been very active lately in terms of online debates, but when I saw ubi I thought the same thing. Tradcats can only seethe and cope because at the end of the day they’re just online larpers at best. I’ve met the most functional and well put together folks at orthodox church, but even at the TLM it’s usually just a bunch of chronically online weirdos
Automatic sub,like, and comment with a 8+ min opener song intro then pronouncing Billy Carson as Billy Coreson gets it all ...one would recognize this channels fire with all of those thangs ..thank you for the hours of entertainment...lol... congratulations!!!
Wes Huff did a review of the debate with Inspiring Philosophy in which he states, explicitly, that he doesn’t believe the story of the woman caught in adultery is inspired Scripture.
He's a protestant, God bless him. In any case this wasn't a theology debate with Billy; an atheist scholar could have done the same thing. Wes kind of just let them both babble when the debate became theological.
I really think Ubi's lack of aggression in the first half or more of the debate allowed Erick to let his guard down in admit his contradicting opinion on vatican 1. I think if the debate had been more combative he would have just ran around in circles.
I've not only seen Starship Troopers, I've seen all the sequels. They blow the media literacy crowd's interpretation of the 1st film (humans=bad, bugs=good) out of the water, and God is on humanity's side in the war as the Earth government ends up promoting Christianity.
There is a take on Pascal’s Wager that means you should all choose EO. If the Catholics are right about everything uniquely Roman, then you’re saved in EO and the sacraments are valid anyway. If Rome is wrong about its distinctives then they could be some pretty bad heresies. Might as well go Orthodox :)
Hey Jay, sorry for giving you crap on the papacy before. I hope this isn't the last debate between RC and EO because we got cooked. It was frustrating to listen to Ybarra dragging out the debate with slow speaking and repeating his points.
Catholics get mad when you point out that the Papacy isn’t in the creed or canons of the early church by shifting but to the Papist church the Papal authority is the most fundamental point that everything is subordinate to it and it’s supposed to be known from the very beginning that the Pope was basically God in the Flesh and was evident from all time. So yes it should be very explicit in the early church that’s this is case.
Jay love your stuff, have you heard about TH-cam tags? When you make a video or whatever you need to add tags (like #debate or something). They will help your videos be seen by more people
Well with Erick it can happen that he commits Contextomy where he removes passages from their broader context-historical, literary, and theological and also Eisegesis where he imposes his own interpretation into the text rather than drawing the meaning out of it and Just because certain individuals or writings appear to support a papal interpretation, it does not necessarily establish that the papacy is a biblical or apostolic institution. For instance, the early church fathers used language that could be interpreted in multiple ways, and many of these writings do not explicitly describe a papal office but may refer to general leadership roles or primacy of certain bishops .this is a Overgeneralization .
(When it comes to the tome of leo it is known that on account of doubt because of uprightness and orthodoxy the tome of Leo was inspected by the Eastern bishops, which took 5 days in order for the bishops to compare the tome with Cyrils writings which clearly shows that the bishops considered it a matter of importance that this statement of Latin christology should have its faithfulness to Cyril)
The big issue with "minimalist Papalism" is that it is virtually indistinguishable from the Orthodox position. If the Pope had some very limited power, which was curbed by the collegiality of the Church whenever abused or used for heterodox ends, then that's not at all Vatican 1, for it is not supremacy, but limited power that has the duty to correspond to the synodal consensus of the Church. So, this move by Roman Catholics is so cunning, if deliberately argued for, because it is making their position match the Orthodox, whilst still maintaining that this is the Roman Catholic position. I honestly don't know how that position is at all distinguished from the Orthodox, as if the power of the Pope was curbed by the rest of the Church, the Pope was not above Councils, or the universal consensus of the other bishops, then this is neither what Dictatus Papae claims, nor Pastor Aeternus. It outright contradicts them.
Ybarra's entire opening statements was just one long appeal to authority fallacy. He didn't even bother to give the actual arguments of the people he cited, he just tried to bash the audience over the head with their credentials until they submit. Hence why he kept emphasising how the person he's quoting is an Orthodox bishop or a respecected church historian or a prestigious byzantinist etc. Literally irrelevant. What are their arguments? Are they any good? What evidence do they bring up in support of their claims? None of that from Ybarra though, only "big name Orthodox said this and big name academic said that, therefore the pope is the god-emperor."
Jay, thank you for these breakdowns. I’ve been a catechumen for half a year, and you’re right, 90% of this stuff blows over my head. Watching the debate, I agreed with Ubi, but didn’t feel like he was knocking it out of the park. Your breakdown demonstrates how the papal system doesn’t even have a foundation to stand on in a way Ubi couldn’t necessarily do during the live debate.
one of the mods timed me out when watching live as i got over excited about the funko pop song, as a brit im unable to apologise for my actions as that song is a certified british classic, FUNKO 4 LIFE.
Codex Sinaiticus contains the New Testament books and the Shepherd of Hermas and the epistle of Barnabas. The epistle of Barnabas is very similar to Hebrews in theology. Epistle of Barnabas is nothing like the Gospel of Barnabas.
was in billys live stream and so so so many people still stand up for him and his lies, he just teased a new series hes going to start "The bible study" ..... the majory of his chat was on his side still, hes making it his mission to destroy christianity it seems, he mad, big mad, and its actually kind of scary the amount of people that will never leave his side
You often forget to unmute yourself. Shouldn't there be an easy solution for that like having a blinking light that signals that you're unmuted or some sound signal if you have been unmuted for lets says 2 min?
Nothing feminine about being soft spoken and maintaining one’s composure. The actually lames who do put on the front you describe doesn’t change this 😂 … some people actually just want to be cool.
Jay I’d like to get your take on the Lutheran Confessions (The Book of Concord). What is the main problem with Lutheran doctrine? Would love to see you debate an LCMS Lutheran like Bryan Wolfmueller or Jordan Cooper.
Erick took the affirmative position, only to deny any need to provide any clear proof of the affirmative position. Interesting debate tactic there.
Absolutely crazy
Yeah, all he kept saying was that it was implicit lol. Although Pope Leo didn’t enforce Vatican 1 or Papal Infallibility, he COULD have if he wanted to
It's a bold strategy Cotton let's see if it pays off for em.
Erick cannot be that dumb. He isn’t. I think you can see the tension and cog-dis within him. He desperately wants the entire mythology and Grand Narrative of Rome, from its glorious Pagan Empire days up to now, to be true, real, and the Story of all Stories.
It is that desperate desire (psychological need?) for the Grand Narrative of Rome (see: drama, worldly glory and dominance, power, superiority) to be true that keeps highly intelligent Papists hanging on tightly to an obvious pack of lies.l and clear contradictions. Those still hanging on at this point in information history will not let go easily. It is a deeply spiritual issue, not an intellectual or intelligence problem.
@@greghood1552 lol
“Did I say the Sinai Bible? I meant the Gospel of Yakub.” - Billy probably
@@semyaza555 I'm watching his cope stream rn 🤣 he's a clown
Hahahaha 😂😂😂
@@slowboywhiteboardv4 He deleted that one too 😂.
Wes Huff is an absolute gentleman. He was truly gracious, polite and professional during the entire debate.
agreed.
His poker face is unmatched. I have to assume his video issues are just the times when he couldn't keep it together anymore
Stream starts @ 8:17 for the heretics that skip the intro
Everytim I hear Funko come on, I can't imagine how anyone who isn't demonically influenced could hate this man😂
@@tynytian 🤣🤣🤣😭🙏
This is the first time I came to jays channel after watching him in a debate with Sam...He was so clean cut and chill I never expected him to break out the song and dance!😂😂😂 For sure new subscriber
Thanks, I super skip it haha 😊
😂😂😂love it. Mathdilla mokey !!!!!
What amazes me is there are still gonna be people saying Billy wasn’t wrong and still follow him like nothing happened 💀
I don't follow him, Carson that is.I watch him sometimes though. Must we follow people?
But the Sumerian stories are older. And clearly, the template for Genesis, including the Noah/Utnapishtim story. This seems like fake drama
@@oliveeisner8964 ???
@@oliveeisner8964the Bible doesn't claim to be the first telling of the story, it implies everyone knows what happened, it claims to be the truth about what happened.
@oliveeisner8964 fake drama? No, it just shows that Billy Carson is a used car salesmen.
@@oliveeisner8964because Carson say x. When the case is not x.
if the Pope is the foundation and guardian of Faith how did the Orthodox maintain perfect continuity in traditions and doctrine for 1000 years?
and why the catholics failed miserably in this in the past 70 years?
Even in the 40s the papacy smuggled communists around Europe its bizarre
The pope may have relinquished the triple tiara, but he retains his standing army: Ybarra, Lofton, Fradd et al.
Wes Huff v billy Carson debate just dropped in full!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Daily reminder that skipping the Funko Pop intro is considered heresy
Even if I played dillamonkey back to back
I prefer dillamonkey way more tbh. That song lives rent free in my head.
Next time we have a council, we should remind the bishops to put that in the canons
It was declared anatheba at the 5th ladderin council
The moment in the Huf/Carson debate when the moderator said “we all critical thinkers” made me cry with laughter 😂
My mom met Billy at a airport once and he didn’t even bring up flying pyramids… she was pissed
Came here for the funkopop intro, then left after the funkopop intro.
The first debate felt like Yakub vs. Gavin Ortlund
💀
Accretion*
27:08 “I’m a clown, A SERIOUS CLOWN.” LOL - s/o to you Jay, went to my first Divine Liturgy yesterday
As someone seeking between Roman Catholicism and Eastern Orthodoxy, it’s not looking good for Roman Catholicism. Even if I can admire good aspects of what the Roman Catholic Church has produced, I’m not seeing a way out for it in relation to being True.
Very well said
Godspeed
I saw a conversation between Ubi and Suan Somma a while ago that was quite good. One thing Ubi said which struck me is that he thinks the degradation of Catholicisim is a bad thing and wants to see it restored (in truth of course, which means renouncing the heresies), as opposed to Protestantism which he said needs to die. I saw an admiration for those good aspects you mentioned and a lament that they are weakening, while still holding fitm that Catholicism is in error.
Ruslan invited you on? 😅You gonna end Protestantism there.
Ruslan is a charismatic too I think. The absolute bottom of the barrel Protestant denomination
When ?
Billy carson i meant the chronicles of Narnia 😂😂
16:18 I’m in tears I used to use moose and gel for my hair back in 2014😭
Had my guitar tuner resting on my speaker, weird fact, Jay speaks mainly in C#. The frequency of the shamans, exposed.
I’m going to write a book so I can refer to it as fact when I want.
Pope Silverius ( 536-537) was deposed by political maneuvering during the reign of the Byzantine Emperor Justinian and Empress Theodora, largely due to accusations of collaborating with the Goths.
Vigilius, supported by Theodora, became pope under highly questionable circumstances, with the emperor's backing. This was a political, not ecclesiastical, appointment ,Vigilius later condemned and anathematized Silverius, accusing him of heresy and treason ,Roman Catholic teaching asserts that no one can judge the pope (Prima Sedes a nemine judicatur), as stated in canon law and reinforced by the First Vatican Council (1870)
Pope Vigilius, in condemning Silverius, directly contradicted this principle. If a pope can judge and condemn another pope, it undermines claims of an unbroken and supreme papal authority which raises the question: who has the authority to determine if a pope is legitimate or if his teachings or actions are heretical? If Pope Vigilius was correct in judging Silverius, this implies that popes can be deposed or declared illegitimate, which contradicts the notion of papal indefectibility ,Conversely, if Vigilius was wrong, then his own legitimacy as pope is called into question, creating a paradox for claims of an unbroken papal office)
Hey Jay Dyer if you go to Ruslans platform try to explain original sin from the EO perspective.
So glad and blessed to have found you Jay. My Orthodox brother. Learning so much ☦️☦️☦️💜💜💜 B Blessed
There should be an 8th ecumenical council against Intro Skiporius
Who knew ubi was a gentleman and a stud. For a decade we pictured an obese guy on the couch covered in chips with books everywhere.
He's literally the trad chad family man all the tradcats claim to want in this country, then throughout the whole stream they were making fun of his face and voice calling him an incel or hipster just because he's standing up to their stupid cult. Nevermind fradds mods being totally one sided, make a fat joke about ybarra and it's instant ban but make all the jokes about any of the Orthodox you want.
@@Desertfox-o2xI haven’t been very active lately in terms of online debates, but when I saw ubi I thought the same thing. Tradcats can only seethe and cope because at the end of the day they’re just online larpers at best. I’ve met the most functional and well put together folks at orthodox church, but even at the TLM it’s usually just a bunch of chronically online weirdos
Automatic sub,like, and comment with a 8+ min opener song intro then pronouncing Billy Carson as Billy Coreson gets it all ...one would recognize this channels fire with all of those thangs ..thank you for the hours of entertainment...lol... congratulations!!!
Wes Huff did a review of the debate with Inspiring Philosophy in which he states, explicitly, that he doesn’t believe the story of the woman caught in adultery is inspired Scripture.
That might be a yikes
He's a protestant, God bless him. In any case this wasn't a theology debate with Billy; an atheist scholar could have done the same thing. Wes kind of just let them both babble when the debate became theological.
This is a fairly common take in the Protestant world since there is a firm majority of their scholars which have normalized these views.
1:02:18 The start of the Ubi/Ybarra debate.
And 2:50:19 for debate floor opened, preceded by Superchat reads
I giggle every time I hear Jay's impression of Erick.
It is great
I really think Ubi's lack of aggression in the first half or more of the debate allowed Erick to let his guard down in admit his contradicting opinion on vatican 1. I think if the debate had been more combative he would have just ran around in circles.
“Did I say Sinai Bible? I meant this piece of paper I drawed a dog on”
Ubi looks exactly the way I imagined him from his voice. A true omegachad history chadnerd. He did great.
"omegachad" is some serious sightseeing sit in front of the icons lil bro.
@@orthodoxapologetics Indeed.
Low tier slow bois will say this is racist.
Haven't you heard doe? Da Bible is rakesist yo. Slaves n sheeit.
Based either way
Bleg got owned like its 1800s
I've not only seen Starship Troopers, I've seen all the sequels. They blow the media literacy crowd's interpretation of the 1st film (humans=bad, bugs=good) out of the water, and God is on humanity's side in the war as the Earth government ends up promoting Christianity.
There is a take on Pascal’s Wager that means you should all choose EO. If the Catholics are right about everything uniquely Roman, then you’re saved in EO and the sacraments are valid anyway. If Rome is wrong about its distinctives then they could be some pretty bad heresies. Might as well go Orthodox :)
Hey Jay, sorry for giving you crap on the papacy before. I hope this isn't the last debate between RC and EO because we got cooked. It was frustrating to listen to Ybarra dragging out the debate with slow speaking and repeating his points.
Catholics get mad when you point out that the Papacy isn’t in the creed or canons of the early church by shifting but to the Papist church the Papal authority is the most fundamental point that everything is subordinate to it and it’s supposed to be known from the very beginning that the Pope was basically God in the Flesh and was evident from all time. So yes it should be very explicit in the early church that’s this is case.
"DATS NOT TRUE JAY, DAT AINT DUH DERKA DERT" - Erick Ybarra 😂
Erick take the Cinnabon out of your ears!!! 😂😂😂
He said “He gave the triple tiara to the UN or whatever”. I about spit my coffee out 😂😂
I think they actually did
@ I agree just didn’t expect it lol. Love your content got Chrismated on Palm Sunday ☦️
Two manuscripts, one in italian and one in spanish, and kang carson really sat there and thought "sheeeit, seems apostolic to me"
29:46 just converted me to EO, thank you Jay!
2:47:39 it’s an optics tactic. “Look how humble and honest ybarra is. Such a great guy”
The world needs an extended version of Funko Pop! ❤
Repeat!!
Jay love your stuff, have you heard about TH-cam tags? When you make a video or whatever you need to add tags (like #debate or something). They will help your videos be seen by more people
Well with Erick it can happen that he commits Contextomy where he removes passages from their broader context-historical, literary, and theological and also Eisegesis where he imposes his own interpretation into the text rather than drawing the meaning out of it and Just because certain individuals or writings appear to support a papal interpretation, it does not necessarily establish that the papacy is a biblical or apostolic institution. For instance, the early church fathers used language that could be interpreted in multiple ways, and many of these writings do not explicitly describe a papal office but may refer to general leadership roles or primacy of certain bishops .this is a Overgeneralization .
It's uncanny how much Ybarra sounds like Gavin Ortlund at 2x speed
Jay said what I was thinking when I first saw Wes. Dude legit looks like he’s from Starship Troopers 😂😂😂
Very significant video. Good job Jay
We love you , Jay!!!🎉🎉🎉
(When it comes to the tome of leo it is known that on account of doubt because of uprightness and orthodoxy the tome of Leo was inspected by the Eastern bishops, which took 5 days in order for the bishops to compare the tome with Cyrils writings which clearly shows that the bishops considered it a matter of importance that this statement of Latin christology should have its faithfulness to Cyril)
51:59 Chrichton Leprechaun reference?? 😂😂
First time watching a stream intro of Dayer 😂😂😂 what's going on? 😂😂😂
Great stream!
Hating on the Egyptian Celtic study Bible is too far Dyer. Too far. 😂
The big issue with "minimalist Papalism" is that it is virtually indistinguishable from the Orthodox position. If the Pope had some very limited power, which was curbed by the collegiality of the Church whenever abused or used for heterodox ends, then that's not at all Vatican 1, for it is not supremacy, but limited power that has the duty to correspond to the synodal consensus of the Church.
So, this move by Roman Catholics is so cunning, if deliberately argued for, because it is making their position match the Orthodox, whilst still maintaining that this is the Roman Catholic position. I honestly don't know how that position is at all distinguished from the Orthodox, as if the power of the Pope was curbed by the rest of the Church, the Pope was not above Councils, or the universal consensus of the other bishops, then this is neither what Dictatus Papae claims, nor Pastor Aeternus. It outright contradicts them.
30:53 SKITTLES 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 I almost coughed up a lung.
Best intro ever 😂🔥🔥🙌
I love that people think they can reawaken gnostic heresies without anyone knowing the history. these issues were solved 2k years ago yo
Ybarra's entire opening statements was just one long appeal to authority fallacy. He didn't even bother to give the actual arguments of the people he cited, he just tried to bash the audience over the head with their credentials until they submit. Hence why he kept emphasising how the person he's quoting is an Orthodox bishop or a respecected church historian or a prestigious byzantinist etc. Literally irrelevant. What are their arguments? Are they any good? What evidence do they bring up in support of their claims? None of that from Ybarra though, only "big name Orthodox said this and big name academic said that, therefore the pope is the god-emperor."
@ 29:57 💀this mfk jay is too funny
Billy Carson is a self-proclaimed Masterdebater
Jay out here reacting to a reaction of a debate of a Kang. What is happening?
Jay, thank you for these breakdowns. I’ve been a catechumen for half a year, and you’re right, 90% of this stuff blows over my head. Watching the debate, I agreed with Ubi, but didn’t feel like he was knocking it out of the park. Your breakdown demonstrates how the papal system doesn’t even have a foundation to stand on in a way Ubi couldn’t necessarily do during the live debate.
44:50 fake laughing pisses me off so much, I don't know why but it's so annoying
but fake fake laughing is okay I presume
one of the mods timed me out when watching live as i got over excited about the funko pop song, as a brit im unable to apologise for my actions as that song is a certified british classic, FUNKO 4 LIFE.
Codex Sinaiticus contains the New Testament books and the Shepherd of Hermas and the epistle of Barnabas. The epistle of Barnabas is very similar to Hebrews in theology. Epistle of Barnabas is nothing like the Gospel of Barnabas.
Can’t wait to see you on Ruslan!
Billy Carson is a hood healer
was in billys live stream and so so so many people still stand up for him and his lies, he just teased a new series hes going to start "The bible study" ..... the majory of his chat was on his side still, hes making it his mission to destroy christianity it seems, he mad, big mad, and its actually kind of scary the amount of people that will never leave his side
Unfortunately there are so many videos of him saying the same thing over and over again...
Its hilariously awkward, how Jay, can articulate himself in such a melo professional way.
Yet he has intros like that haha 😅 . Confuse all the "Ops"
How is that not professional?
I've seen his wife. She is a funko pop.
Stop making it into something it's not.
Wouldn’t the mere possibility of sola fide in quote mines of the early church fathers also stand as a valid argument according to EY’s logic?
Being “nice” isn’t necessarily about being nice… it keeps people in the ring long enough to thoroughly defeat their bs.
Jay i love the funko pop dearly. But we need an alien to twerk for me to make a return. 😂
You often forget to unmute yourself. Shouldn't there be an easy solution for that like having a blinking light that signals that you're unmuted or some sound signal if you have been unmuted for lets says 2 min?
Jay should do a response video to what Mike Winger just put out regarding the Protoevangelium of James.
30:41 dude coming at me with the Kundalini spirit. Kenneth Hagin style.
1:10 Loool the Motown Dillamonkey sample makes it even better.
is it me or does billy carson have that young morgan freeman voice 😂
exactly
Your impersonations of Billy made me LOL
The Intro: YAY THE EIGHTIES ARE SO BACK!!😂😂
Billy CORson quoting the gospel of BORnabbas
This stream was so funny ❤😭
Would like to see Jay debate Wess!!
“You’re some sort of big, fat, smart-bug aren’t you?” To billy cawson.
Even the greeks covet the famous Wes Huff hair line!
I'm not a Greek and my hairline is diva level already.
@@JayDyer yet that claim is not verified in the Sinai Bible 🥱
Classic end to the stream ( we were warned )
Billy Carson looks like a stoned Creflo Dollar. Coincidence?
😂😂😂
We was pyramid kangs riding pyramids cuhh
Nothing feminine about being soft spoken and maintaining one’s composure. The actually lames who do put on the front you describe doesn’t change this 😂 … some people actually just want to be cool.
No he did not say I wana know where da pyramids at lmfaooooooooo
That laugh from 44:50 was like Rocket making fun of Quill fake
hahaha, one of your best opens
Intro was lit bruh fire yeet yolo
W Jay as usual
Any relation to Ben Carson?
Jay I’d like to get your take on the Lutheran Confessions (The Book of Concord). What is the main problem with Lutheran doctrine? Would love to see you debate an LCMS Lutheran like Bryan Wolfmueller or Jordan Cooper.
Sinai scriptura
It's good that it came out though because Carson has been exposed