Y'all, I tried to find some interesting behind the scenes stuff abut Moana 2! But all i could were ROPES lol Its crazy how far animation tech has gotten but its also SOooooo underwhelming now. What are your thoughts on Moana 2?
Brad Bird is right, the pioneering time of CG animation where every new film featured a groundbreaking technical advancement has been long over. There are still advancements but they're much more in the barely perceptible details. What's worse is that the general CG styles, even between studios, look very same-y, and that despite a vocal minority online wishing for the era of hand-drawn feature animation to return, it's families with children swarming corporate fodder like the Disney "live-action" remakes and Moana 2, earning Disney millions and making the artistic argument against CG moot. From a business standpoint.
I love how people complain about movies having too much CGI, but yet they are willing to dump a billion dollars just to see the next computer-animated movie.
Not the same people. Also when people say there is too much CGI. Thay are usually referring to movies that are not that good or only showcase the technology but not the art and craft of the artists.
Is agree the difference between CGI complainers and 3d animation isnt that they are both technically CGI but the fact that animation is trying to deviate from realism and lean more on expression and art. Whereas live action CGI just wants to be realistic with not much expression or merit
@@Oscar95451 Yeah we didn't have character development for no one... Not Maui, Moana or the crew. Maui could've become mortal but they backtrack and mona may be a demigod but it is not explicitly said.
Y'all, I tried to find some interesting behind the scenes stuff abut Moana 2! But all i could were ROPES lol Its crazy how far animation tech has gotten but its also SOooooo underwhelming now. What are your thoughts on Moana 2?
Brad Bird is right, the pioneering time of CG animation where every new film featured a groundbreaking technical advancement has been long over. There are still advancements but they're much more in the barely perceptible details. What's worse is that the general CG styles, even between studios, look very same-y, and that despite a vocal minority online wishing for the era of hand-drawn feature animation to return, it's families with children swarming corporate fodder like the Disney "live-action" remakes and Moana 2, earning Disney millions and making the artistic argument against CG moot. From a business standpoint.
I love how people complain about movies having too much CGI, but yet they are willing to dump a billion dollars just to see the next computer-animated movie.
Not the same people. Also when people say there is too much CGI. Thay are usually referring to movies that are not that good or only showcase the technology but not the art and craft of the artists.
Is agree the difference between CGI complainers and 3d animation isnt that they are both technically CGI but the fact that animation is trying to deviate from realism and lean more on expression and art. Whereas live action CGI just wants to be realistic with not much expression or merit
It’s the friggin’ story
There really is no winning with CGI is there 🙄
Same script but not same soul from first film.
Every time I see a Disney animated movie nowadays, I often can't help thinking "Studio Ghibli woulda done it better."
I liked Moana 2 but it did play it safe and had few thrills to be had.
What is “play it safe”?
@@Oscar95451 A similar story I believe. Not enough character developments or a more serious story.
@@tobiasburrell6055 the biggest example that i can think of is Shrek the Third.
And i thought that i am the “King of Play it Safe” :P
@@Oscar95451 Yeah we didn't have character development for no one... Not Maui, Moana or the crew. Maui could've become mortal but they backtrack and mona may be a demigod but it is not explicitly said.
Yeah, kinda
EARLYYYYYYYY ‼️‼️‼️‼️‼️‼️‼️