What’s that ? Karen killing her boyfriend real slowly and then blaming the world and changing her story 14 times. After all that getting supported ? Yeah crazy.
@@shanedaley6236Johns DNA in tail light housing. Brand new car so the chances of that light being changed 2 months after buying it is 100/1. John’s clothes covered in fragments from Karen’s tailight That’s enough there. Add to that the fact she said he’s dead at 5am and 5:01 saying he got hit by a plough. Kerry Roberts calling police and hospitals straight after these calls backs her testimony up. Her crazy ness on the day in question and shortly after. Her seeing a body under snow and firstly knowing it’s a man and secondly knowing it’s John. Amazing Karen. How did she know it’s John lol ? Admission to all at the scene. That’s just for starters. Explain that
At least let the woman go home before her next trial, Boston PD has a whole lot of explaining to do. I hope they’re scared sh1tless by the FBI investigation. National embarrassment.
Those are dog bites not road rash or whatever on his arm video of her leaving the house to search for him she still has a full taillight and not the photo the state showed
I still do not understand why people on their 50s wanted to have a party on the night of a blizzard. It takes me too long to recuperate & at this age, I want to sleep in my own bed. This whole dirty group lured JO there to beat him & leave him to die and blame it being hit by the plow driver Lucky. Their plan charged once Karen made the comment “could I have hit him!”. They decided to make her their patsy because all of them catty women were jealous of Karen. Free Karen Read!!!!!
1/3 of evidence and you believe anyone can judge anything fully ? Lol. They didn’t even know about DNA inside the housing of a brand new car or tail light fragments in johns clothes. Ridiculous. Karen killed John. The rest is a fairy tale made up by criminals.
I’m asking this in all honesty- because I’m REALLY curious Do Karen Read supporters believe another cop killed John? It seems so from the comments but admittedly-I don’t know!
@@stevenprice6957 Yes that is common sense and an excellent expert witness testified to it. The Defense's witnesses were far better than the Prosecutions Expert Witnesses who when asked to explain how something happened they respond " it just did" "and stuff" 😆
@@deborah_attorneyAre you serious? The dog lady. The waltz in off the street half way through. Umm not worth a comment. The doctor who had only half the evidence and knew nothing about the testing in this case regarding DNA and didn’t see the body other than a photo. The car reconstruction guys. Very smart but in their case they had less evidence put before them. I’m talking 1/3. That’s like a heart surgeon looking at kegs and giving a theory on his heart. That’s ridiculous. The evidence was cherry picked when given to them. So they didn’t even know it was reverse at a certain speed. They didn’t know John’s DNA was inside the tail light housing. Do you understand that? Meaning under the plastic. It’s a brand new car Duhh. Lol. How on earth can johns DNA get in there? Only one possibly way. His arm was in it. Fragments of Karen’s tail light were on his clothes. Again these book worms say they weren’t told that. Now to not look absolutely ridiculous they said ohh we still believe in this theory. Lol. In reality they should have said, with the small amount of evidence shown we had this theory. It’s a joke. The whole things a joke. Karen’s own attorney said it was an accident. So did he Miss understand what Karen was saying too 😂😂😂. Stop the crap. You people are hilarious
There were many and her with her attorney before Jackson said it was a misfortune accident and she is so sorry then she comes up with her made up story of conspiracy !! That is discusting . Take your own blame Karen don’t throw where ever it will fall
@@stevenprice6957 - I like the way you flipped my words around and used them against me…. Super clever… you definitely showed your wittiness and proved me wrong entirely 😂
"Hos long ti McCabe goes to prizon"
Not guilty. She was framed by the LEO's of Canton, MA. They think she's not as important as they are.
it´s been established that he wasn´t killed by a car. There is one corrupt juror
💯
One of the most unnerving thing I have ever witnessed.
What’s that ? Karen killing her boyfriend real slowly and then blaming the world and changing her story 14 times. After all that getting supported ? Yeah crazy.
@@stevenprice6957she didn't but tell me what evidence you believe says she did
@@shanedaley6236Johns DNA in tail light housing. Brand new car so the chances of that light being changed 2 months after buying it is 100/1. John’s clothes covered in fragments from Karen’s tailight That’s enough there. Add to that the fact she said he’s dead at 5am and 5:01 saying he got hit by a plough. Kerry Roberts calling police and hospitals straight after these calls backs her testimony up. Her crazy ness on the day in question and shortly after. Her seeing a body under snow and firstly knowing it’s a man and secondly knowing it’s John. Amazing Karen. How did she know it’s John lol ? Admission to all at the scene. That’s just for starters. Explain that
DA and police are hiding something
@@stevenprice6957you’re an actual bootlicking clown holy crap😂
What can be so difficult professionals PROOF proof NOT HIT BY N CAR!
At least let the woman go home before her next trial, Boston PD has a whole lot of explaining to do. I hope they’re scared sh1tless by the FBI investigation. National embarrassment.
This is ridiculous her tail light was not smashed they have a video, so she was setup !!!
I am so nervous. Ket’s just hope it’s a smarter jury than the Casey Anthony trial.
Yes, guilty.
They haven’t even proven a car hit him. Trust in the science. Free this poor woman
Those are dog bites not road rash or whatever on his arm video of her leaving the house to search for him she still has a full taillight and not the photo the state showed
NOT GUILTY NOT GUILTY NOT GUILTY ……COPS DID IT COPS DID IT COPS DID IT
I still do not understand why people on their 50s wanted to have a party on the night of a blizzard.
It takes me too long to recuperate & at this age, I want to sleep in my own bed.
This whole dirty group lured JO there to beat him & leave him to die and blame it being hit by the plow driver Lucky.
Their plan charged once Karen made the comment “could I have hit him!”.
They decided to make her their patsy because all of them catty women were jealous of Karen.
Free Karen Read!!!!!
We're talking about cops here, not the smartest, or responsible people.
Drunks
@@deedeerouse419 drunks led by Karen herself... how many did she have that night 🤔
Guilty.
Welp... I guess the Jurors are going to wait until after the 4th of July
Predicting verdict today. Calling mistrial.
See what botox does to your face?
ARCCA Experts over Trooper Paul!
1/3 of evidence and you believe anyone can judge anything fully ? Lol. They didn’t even know about DNA inside the housing of a brand new car or tail light fragments in johns clothes. Ridiculous. Karen killed John. The rest is a fairy tale made up by criminals.
I’m asking this in all honesty- because I’m REALLY curious
Do Karen Read supporters believe another cop killed John?
It seems so from the comments but admittedly-I don’t know!
Judge "Karen" is trying her worst to bring in "guilty"
Not guilty. Proof is in the pudding!!
Based on what I have seen, I do not think that she is guilty
Not guilty free karen read❤
She is not guilty, Because there a lots missing evidence, And what dog bit John 😉
Dog ? Lol. Still going with the dog.
@@stevenprice6957 The injuries on the arm were consistent with dog bites.
@@Doc_-_Savage_1Lol. Canine DNA would be loaded on John.
@@stevenprice6957 Yes that is common sense and an excellent expert witness testified to it. The Defense's witnesses were far better than the Prosecutions Expert Witnesses who when asked to explain how something happened they respond " it just did" "and stuff" 😆
@@deborah_attorneyAre you serious? The dog lady. The waltz in off the street half way through. Umm not worth a comment. The doctor who had only half the evidence and knew nothing about the testing in this case regarding DNA and didn’t see the body other than a photo. The car reconstruction guys. Very smart but in their case they had less evidence put before them. I’m talking 1/3. That’s like a heart surgeon looking at kegs and giving a theory on his heart. That’s ridiculous. The evidence was cherry picked when given to them. So they didn’t even know it was reverse at a certain speed. They didn’t know John’s DNA was inside the tail light housing. Do you understand that? Meaning under the plastic. It’s a brand new car Duhh. Lol. How on earth can johns DNA get in there? Only one possibly way. His arm was in it. Fragments of Karen’s tail light were on his clothes. Again these book worms say they weren’t told that. Now to not look absolutely ridiculous they said ohh we still believe in this theory. Lol. In reality they should have said, with the small amount of evidence shown we had this theory. It’s a joke. The whole things a joke. Karen’s own attorney said it was an accident. So did he Miss understand what Karen was saying too 😂😂😂. Stop the crap. You people are hilarious
NOT GUILTY.
NOT GUILTY.
NOT GUILTY.
NOT GUILTY.
NOT GUILTY.
Not guilty
What role mainstream media has ought to be a more important question
Guilty
Why do you think she’s guilty? There wasn’t one single piece of evidence presented in that trial that proves she’s guilty.
@@KT-fm7dtno there’s hundreds. Guilty.
There were many and her with her attorney before Jackson said it was a misfortune accident and she is so sorry then she comes up with her made up story of conspiracy !! That is discusting . Take your own blame Karen don’t throw where ever it will fall
@@stevenprice6957 Yeah, all states evidence is in doubt, full stop.
@@Doc_-_Savage_1crap. Karen’s phantom cover up may fool many who have zero idea or common sense but anyone with logic will say she’s a killer.
She's not laughing now. 😂
Not so full of it now Jackson and Kate
A Life for a Life 🌾
guilty
Oh, so you’re not very smart? Got it
@@mikey0946no you are the one who’s not very smart. Got it.
@@stevenprice6957 - I like the way you flipped my words around and used them against me…. Super clever… you definitely showed your wittiness and proved me wrong entirely 😂
u sick
Massachusetts is a national embarrassment. Takes the word massholes to a different level.