Lauren Southern Renounces Trad Life, Dishes the Dirt on Ex-Husband.
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 6 พ.ค. 2024
- Lauren Southern seems to be suffering under the delusion that she is a victim of right-wing trad-wife culture. Now first of all, I don’t put myself forth as an advocate or even a participant of that culture. In my lane of the socioeconomic bracket, pretty much everyone has to work regardless of your gender. Put that to the side. Southern now suggests that she was persuaded by the trad-wife/ trad-life worldview, that she was as advocate of it, but then was victimized by it. This is the gist of an article in Unherd. #tradlife
Twitter: / real_machera
Read more: michaelmacherablog.com
Facebook: profile.php?...
Support the channel: paypal.me/michaelmacherablog
Outro Music: "Make Your Vows" by Michael Machera; Vocals by Greg Welch
This whole thing has BIG "leopards ate my face/self aware wolves vibes to it. She pushed this for so long and NOW she is against it when it happened to her? So she just doesn't think about her opinions at all? SMH of course this was always going to be bad.
She chose the wrong guy, that's it! She also didn't exactly follow the "on line right wing" advice anyway if you take note of the mate she chose. He wasn't exactly Darren, out of "Bewitched". She also associated with "hope not hate" a very "hateful" left wing organisation in Britain. I'm just astounded at her nerve in coming crawling back to the internet, wanting to resume separating impressionable young men and not so young men from their cash while masquerading as a conservative.
Darren? He was more feminine than this wife, and to believe as portrayed on the show that a simp like him would get a woman like that to marry him? And it gave men all over america false hope.
Women will never take accountability for their poor choices (left or right).
What would you consider accountable on the woman's end in this case? She realized she not only married the wrong person, but also organized her marriage based on wrong values, which ended in borderline abuse. What is the accountable thing to do here in your opinion? Stay in that marriage? IMO the most accountable thing is to not fall into traditionalist, anti-feministi nonsense.
@@wolf-claw I think the accountable thing here is to say "Yup, I was wrong, this life ain't for me" instead of implying one was misled. We all make bad decisions because something sounds "shiny" when really it isn't. In fact, politicians depend on it. Before someone claims I'm "victim shaming", I'm not. I'm "prudence shaming". The world won't look out for us, we need to make prudent choices, and when we don't, accept that part of the blame. So in other words, I agree, and I say this as a "traditionalist". Traditionalism is not for all, and neither is progressivism. People should be true to themselves instead of trying to force themselves into a category either through peer-pressure or because they think it will get them "likes" on their social media presence (probably the case here, IMO).
The other thing is people don't turn into jerks out of the blue. There are always red flags, even if we choose to ignore them - and it is a choice. We're so infatuated with the person that all the red flags look like decoration instead of big-ass warning labels. The cure to that is maturity - not to let our feelings control us to the point where we lose reason.
Yea, every woman is a right wing white nationalist. Especially your mother.
@LouisGiliberto Generally speaking I do agree with you. However, her opposing all the things that were a red flag about her husband would have actually been very *feminist* of her. Young women who want to be traditional are not encouraged to oppose a man being controlling or disciplining her. Once a woman internalizes such values, only pure luck can save her from the kind of marriage Lauren had. In my opinion she is to blame for internalizing such values when she knew very well about the alternatives.
@@wolf-claw "Young women who want to be traditional are not encouraged to oppose a man being controlling or disciplining her"
Interesting. I don't have that experience, nor have I ever encouraged a female to not oppose a man. My perspective is it's the opposite: from a traditionalist perspective, women are to be protected, not bullied, and to quote St. John Chrysostom a man should love his wife as Christ loves His Church - a man should be willing to give his life for her. If a traditionalist woman is taught that, when a guy treats her like crap, she will know to walk the other way.
After all, traditionalists and progressivists both respect women, but from a very different perspective. The key thing being that respect is there, and bullying and such is not acceptible.
The claim that "it's feminist" I think is misplaced. Women were respected before the current waves of feminism. It's not like in 1940 men were going around with clubs dragging brides home by their hair. I know it's sometimes presented that way, but it's simply not true, and easily provable by historical record. Most romances written of previous eras - and romances show ideals, including Disney stories, show a man who is attentive to his wife, cares for her, provides for her and so forth. There is nothing holding up a male bully as some kind of ideal. That's a myth.
I think what you're describing is neither a traditionalist nor progressivist problem, but rather a problem with people learning to be victims, usually based on elements from their childhood. Accepting being a victim is sometimes a (bad) survival skill to survive abuse. I guarantee you there are both progressivist and traditionalist women (and men) in shelters because of that, not because of any worldview that is progressive or traditional.
If we want to fix the real problem, we have to fix the real issue which is abusive people and learned tolerance of abuse, not "traditionalism"