SCOTUS ruled long ago that there is no right to privacy when in public. Your vehicle has to have a tag, and people should have some form of id, helpful to loved ones if you're found dead. Making it all about privacy to score drugs and hookers, just helps criminals. Consider myself leftist but not far left. Am on law enforcement's side on this one.
You’re not guilty by association, you’re merely a suspect. These services has removed dangerous people off the street. It’s exactly how they caught the Idaho quadruple murderer, Bryan Christopher Kohberger.
I am an artist living quietly and I want to know why GOOGLE wants to know where I am all the time and keeps throwing MAPS in my face. I would like to disable the whole mess.
Next, let our journalists find their balls and ovaries again and stand up for Press Freedom right here in this country. Feeding Assange may have been wrong. But what he did is protected speech.
He can be free affer he proceed to finish the law process needed. And you people can donate money to get him a good lawyer. But he'd rather run and live without freedom. And you can do nothing to help him.
@@XunxunismThat is a statutory process with a certain outcome. It will be a summary trial. This an unserious suggestion in context of respect for our Constitution and Rule of Law. Separately, he is foreign national who has never set foot in the US. Jurisdiction was never obtained, but will also not matter based on what he is charged with. His Human Rights, not to mention implied Constitutional protections are all being denied to him. It's quite appalling and a blight on Western dignity. The press are cowards to turn a blind eye and uncritically tout government arguments.
FYI: keep any info needed if stopped by police on paper, not on your phone. If you hand your open phone to a police officer they can browse through it. Legally? Maybe not but police dont follow laws, they "enforce" laws. Nowadays most our personal and financial info resides on our phones, you wouldnt hand an unlocked phone to a complete strange, dont hand it to a cop.
It does absolutely no good to sue these companies All we're seeing it's like humanitary thing there's an 80-20 split The only one that's not receiving any of it is the people being affected without them knowing they're being affected through it we have a failing congressional rotation we have a sitting delegacy to commit crime to commit the eligibility of making sure it's not taxed properly by suing them then getting to work from them or allowing them to continue the work and go on with their lives without having to inform or put back out to them what's theirs we have a failing congressional rotation in our government and it's being allowed to steal off of every student and every business through a product that each one of them put out with the acceptance that they can do whatever the f*** they want on your equipment that you buy
Agreed. I was across the street getting gas while bank was being robbed. I never knew they got robbed until police pounded on my door one morning. I told to get off my property and F off.
These geofence warrants are very tricky. They are definitely beneficial to law enforcement, but what about a wrongful conviction because of one of these warrants?
Nah nothing gon change people have that location on pin when waiting for traffic looking for best route ordering food waiting for buss using youtube uding uber
I live in West Virginia and the law enforcement around here has been battling inside there own workforce .people caught with tracking little children to see them change clothes hacking there phones they also killed a little girl Gretchen never found her or all 750 missing wemon
This google geo location helps alot and in particular i know is those international manhaunt for pedos as an example but i know theres alot. Normally a high profile scandal or event happen to spark this very big changes. As reporters saying googles location helps alot of case but its weird that they want to stop complying to law enforcement geo location without any good reason.
You're in a big field your family's at home loving this field but as soon as he tries to learn new stuff they understandings of the clean rooms start turning the other rotation and it poison you and you don't even know what's going on next thing you know your mom's not here next thing you know your uncles outside mowing the yard going through withdrawals trying to come off of stuff because you can feel the balls floating in the atmosphere it expands the heartbeat or the weakness of the heart you find a laying over on the side of the road
The droplets that lay up in the sky that don't have to be right on top of you cuz they're in a mathematical inside out spread with some of these errors and some of these multiple cations of x but it's your field it's y'all's accepted change at any time through anybody's house
But anyways here's another one so we all know this level of cancers is pretty big in the United States and put a lot of money into it or they protecting it or are they inducing it constantly feeding from our minds to these ads
Now as these people are allowed to do whatever they want they're so far ahead in the construction of technology but the construction of technology goes through everything and it's got these privacies and these blocks and everything like that and our families are sitting in hospitals with privacy receptions being blocked on multiple coordination points Where's your child at today is he sitting in a cancer treatment because they block the understanding of how they're allowed to get corrected
I'm thinking about the murderers they have caught using this so I think it's bad but also at the same time it's good. The government shouldn't force private companies to do their work
Would you be OK with a store refusing to provide vid evidence to solve a crime against you? What if you defended yourself against an attacker and without vid evidence it appears that you are the initial aggressor?
@@bobroberts2371I’d prefer doing business with a company that has a principled stance on data privacy. An intelligent person would zoom out and look at the bigger picture at stake here.
@@residentlou4410 Would you be principled enough that if someone you cared about was kidnapped, you would tell the police not to use cell data / web browsing data / license plate readers to track them down?
@@bobroberts2371 stores provide the video with a warrant or if there is a purchase dispute and the card holder claims they did not make an in-person transaction and files a chargeback claim. They also provide it immediately if the store is the victim. They are not bound by the same privacy claims an a company like a bank would be bound by when it comes to releasing customer information.
You REALLY think Google is doing this to promote freedom? They know everywhere you go, know what apps you use and pay for, and they SELL that information. Google offers the Android OS for free and if you are not paying, you are the product.
@@chrisstanley5647 So you're telling me that the government persecuted "protesters" not people who perhaps looted and destroyed property? I'm guessing by your "Agent Orange" comment was about Trump. If not please clarify. Otherwise that same geo fence helped target January 6 rioters.
@@chrisstanley5647 So you're telling me that the government persecuted "protesters" not people who perhaps looted and destroyed property? I'm guessing by your "Agent Orange" comment was about Trump. If not please clarify. Otherwise that same geo fence helped target January 6 rioters.
Most cops are unaware of the actual laws they enforce. Just wing it!
Its a shame they dont know the laws so they use that against the people.
SCOTUS ruled long ago that there is no right to privacy when in public. Your vehicle has to have a tag, and people should have some form of id, helpful to loved ones if you're found dead. Making it all about privacy to score drugs and hookers, just helps criminals. Consider myself leftist but not far left. Am on law enforcement's side on this one.
Warrant for specific individuals, yes, otherwise no.
I bet they will still HAVE that information because it has financial value to them.
I support this. Privacy. Let the cops do their own job.
Until you or a family member are a victim.
You’re not guilty by association, you’re merely a suspect. These services has removed dangerous people off the street. It’s exactly how they caught the Idaho quadruple murderer, Bryan Christopher Kohberger.
I mean😂 that case can fall apart very fast. He could win at trial. You've clearly not become familiar with that case.
If they need Google to solve their crimes then we're in big trouble.
@@stevenboddy4232This person clearly knows nothing at all.
@@Look_What_You_Did so exactly how many wrongful convictions are you talking about, Felicia?
I am an artist living quietly and I want to know why GOOGLE wants to know where I am all the time and keeps throwing MAPS in my face. I would like to disable the whole mess.
Next, let our journalists find their balls and ovaries again and stand up for Press Freedom right here in this country. Feeding Assange may have been wrong. But what he did is protected speech.
He can be free affer he proceed to finish the law process needed. And you people can donate money to get him a good lawyer. But he'd rather run and live without freedom. And you can do nothing to help him.
@@XunxunismThat is a statutory process with a certain outcome. It will be a summary trial. This an unserious suggestion in context of respect for our Constitution and Rule of Law. Separately, he is foreign national who has never set foot in the US. Jurisdiction was never obtained, but will also not matter based on what he is charged with. His Human Rights, not to mention implied Constitutional protections are all being denied to him. It's quite appalling and a blight on Western dignity. The press are cowards to turn a blind eye and uncritically tout government arguments.
@@SynthwaveDuck You are wrong. The reason why you are wrong is you neglect and distort very simple to understand laws. Laws are laws.
FYI: keep any info needed if stopped by police on paper, not on your phone. If you hand your open phone to a police officer they can browse through it. Legally? Maybe not but police dont follow laws, they "enforce" laws. Nowadays most our personal and financial info resides on our phones, you wouldnt hand an unlocked phone to a complete strange, dont hand it to a cop.
Pigs can not search your phone without a warrant
😊😊😊
Wait till people need help solving loved ones who have unsolved cases
Good
The officer ran away that was accused and it's all quiet now?
Damn 😮 they have never read the Constitution. Going broke paying out lawsuits for violating people's rights. 😂
This explains a lot now!!!! 😊
Yeah so😒cops cant have it and not a word about other government agenciez
It's an overreach!
It does absolutely no good to sue these companies All we're seeing it's like humanitary thing there's an 80-20 split The only one that's not receiving any of it is the people being affected without them knowing they're being affected through it we have a failing congressional rotation we have a sitting delegacy to commit crime to commit the eligibility of making sure it's not taxed properly by suing them then getting to work from them or allowing them to continue the work and go on with their lives without having to inform or put back out to them what's theirs we have a failing congressional rotation in our government and it's being allowed to steal off of every student and every business through a product that each one of them put out with the acceptance that they can do whatever the f*** they want on your equipment that you buy
Yeah right😏
Sounds like law enforcement abused there authority. And got booted. Good. Those seperatists finally suffer there own consequences.
Because they're not paying for it. Google has no problem with selling the information at all.
Let’s see how can we protect criminals even more. This is pathetic.
How was this ever legal? No wonder nobody likes Google
Agreed. I was across the street getting gas while bank was being robbed. I never knew they got robbed until police pounded on my door one morning. I told to get off my property and F off.
@@DeepDishPizza Wow🤦♂️
@@DeepDishPizza what a tool
@@dan7102 Who’s a tool?
It’s scary that police knows everything you do in your phone
They don't, they have to get a warrant from a judge.
@@lchaneyno they don't need a warrant. Why bother commenting if you don't know what you're talking about?
Well time to have a phone with out maps on it
These geofence warrants are very tricky. They are definitely beneficial to law enforcement, but what about a wrongful conviction because of one of these warrants?
states can get you with their computer crimes act in general still.
Seeking data on people in the vicinity of a crime, not the actual criminal. Pointless.
Nah nothing gon change people have that location on pin when waiting for traffic looking for best route ordering food waiting for buss using youtube uding uber
Terrible! Not in the public's interest.
…without a warrant.
That's one reason to not use Google , nor turn on your GPS. There's other off line GPS you can use my GPS completely disabled period
We pay for apps
Great, now all the criminals will get away. smh
There's still cameras, and license plate readers, and phone towers
I should read the googlemap terms
I live in West Virginia and the law enforcement around here has been battling inside there own workforce .people caught with tracking little children to see them change clothes hacking there phones they also killed a little girl Gretchen never found her or all 750 missing wemon
I will turn the rotation of your energy they will turn the reception of your equipment and you won't even know it
Well it looks like theirs going to be alot more Unsolved crimes/ Murders..
And a lot less civil rights violations
This google geo location helps alot and in particular i know is those international manhaunt for pedos as an example but i know theres alot. Normally a high profile scandal or event happen to spark this very big changes. As reporters saying googles location helps alot of case but its weird that they want to stop complying to law enforcement geo location without any good reason.
You're in a big field your family's at home loving this field but as soon as he tries to learn new stuff they understandings of the clean rooms start turning the other rotation and it poison you and you don't even know what's going on next thing you know your mom's not here next thing you know your uncles outside mowing the yard going through withdrawals trying to come off of stuff because you can feel the balls floating in the atmosphere it expands the heartbeat or the weakness of the heart you find a laying over on the side of the road
The droplets that lay up in the sky that don't have to be right on top of you cuz they're in a mathematical inside out spread with some of these errors and some of these multiple cations of x but it's your field it's y'all's accepted change at any time through anybody's house
But anyways here's another one so we all know this level of cancers is pretty big in the United States and put a lot of money into it or they protecting it or are they inducing it constantly feeding from our minds to these ads
Now as these people are allowed to do whatever they want they're so far ahead in the construction of technology but the construction of technology goes through everything and it's got these privacies and these blocks and everything like that and our families are sitting in hospitals with privacy receptions being blocked on multiple coordination points Where's your child at today is he sitting in a cancer treatment because they block the understanding of how they're allowed to get corrected
Google is trashhhh
I'm thinking about the murderers they have caught using this so I think it's bad but also at the same time it's good. The government shouldn't force private companies to do their work
More specifically they caught Ayoola Ajayi using these tools
Would you be OK with a store refusing to provide vid evidence to solve a crime against you? What if you defended yourself against an attacker and without vid evidence it appears that you are the initial aggressor?
@@bobroberts2371I’d prefer doing business with a company that has a principled stance on data privacy. An intelligent person would zoom out and look at the bigger picture at stake here.
@@residentlou4410 Would you be principled enough that if someone you cared about was kidnapped, you would tell the police not to use cell data / web browsing data / license plate readers to track them down?
@@bobroberts2371 stores provide the video with a warrant or if there is a purchase dispute and the card holder claims they did not make an in-person transaction and files a chargeback claim. They also provide it immediately if the store is the victim. They are not bound by the same privacy claims an a company like a bank would be bound by when it comes to releasing customer information.
Thank you google..... FREEDOM🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉
You REALLY think Google is doing this to promote freedom? They know everywhere you go, know what apps you use and pay for, and they SELL that information. Google offers the Android OS for free and if you are not paying, you are the product.
Great win for criminals 😂😂😂😂
Great win for people that don't want Agent Orange tracking them down after a protest.
@@chrisstanley5647 wait till your family member needs help from law enforcement on an unsolved case
@@LokiTheGodofMischief because they're so good at it now? It doesn't always help, seen it personally. Wanna try again?
@@chrisstanley5647 So you're telling me that the government persecuted "protesters" not people who perhaps looted and destroyed property? I'm guessing by your "Agent Orange" comment was about Trump. If not please clarify. Otherwise that same geo fence helped target January 6 rioters.
@@chrisstanley5647 So you're telling me that the government persecuted "protesters" not people who perhaps looted and destroyed property? I'm guessing by your "Agent Orange" comment was about Trump. If not please clarify. Otherwise that same geo fence helped target January 6 rioters.
Yeah but still sell it to third party. Right?