Analog doesn't have resolution calculation. It captured pictures of exactly how our eyes perceived which means it was more than 4K. The ONLY PROBLEM, at that time there is no screening devices that can show the exact pixels to match the images produced.
@@MaiElizabeth actually analogue does have a resolution. Both an angular resolution from the lens, as well as resolution from the grain size in the film itself. Early full color film had pretty low resolution especially when compared to black and white film from the same time. Regardless the Alexa classic is a digital camera not analog.
Nothing on 765, 435, 535? Nothing on Mini, nothing on LF? Nothing on public feedback or general appreciation on release that explain why they are so popular. What a pointless video
I just read a book about a BBC sponsored British expedition that travelled across Zanzibar and Tanganyika (now Tanzania) in a 3 person hydrogen balloon in the early 1960's featuring an Arriflex camera ( see A. Smith, "Throw out Two Hands" , George Allen & Unwin, (1963) ). The appendix to the book mentioned the camera initially used 8-volt Varley batteries that proved 'spillable and heavy' until one of the cameramen improvised his own battery constructed of electronic flash unit cells, each with 3 floating balls to show the state of charge, embedded in foam rubber and encased in a small metal box that clipped onto the waistband of his trousers. The battery was chargeable from the Land Rover battery via a 12 volt stepdown built in series. They carried a range of 11 lenses for this camera: a 12.5mm Taylor Hobson lens; 40mm, 90 mm, 150mm, 300mm Kilfitt Kilar lenses; as well as 240mm and 400mm Novoflex lenses with follow-focus pistol grips. The film stock (courtesy of the BBC) consisted of 24,000 feet of Eastman Plus-X 16 mm negative film in 100 foot rolls; 24,000 feet of the same in 400 foot rolls; and 12,000 feet of Eastman Tri-X 16mm negative film. The sound recording was done on a Ficord midget tape-recorder.
Since I tried first blackmagic camera , always had feelings of strong dislike towards it! Shadows were super disappointing , had to add more filling light to avoid information loss in shadows.
Not true, it took many iterations and continued development of digital before it gained enough quality, popularity and recognition to supplant film. On a linear scale, that change is pretty recent. But Arri is the brand most used in Hollywood cinema.
I don't want to be nit-picky, but the pictures from Munich are from 1945-1950. In the First World War, there were no bombed-out cities (1917); in 1924, WW1 was over for 6 years. In 1941, World War II was not yet fought on German soil, so a picture of bombed-out Munich is also incorrect. In a film with a historic topic, such gross mistakes make the rest of the statements appear questionable as well.
I think Arri took a chance and moved forward with a new technology while others stayed stagnant. Just like Tesla was first to move forward with EVs. Film and digital are totally different. But once what is best is established, no directors would want to settle for less than that title.
Love it, my first ARRI CLASSIC with 2100 hrs finally I can afford arrived 2 months ago...Cant wait for that first feature film to be produced...
Thank you for sharing your thoughts. Please subscribe to our channel for more awesome contents.
The alexa classic never shot 4k
thank you! Only the new one released this year, the alexa35 can do 4k!
@@iffc8825 That s wrong. The Alexa 65 and Alexa LF also have more than 4k Resolution
Analog doesn't have resolution calculation. It captured pictures of exactly how our eyes perceived which means it was more than 4K.
The ONLY PROBLEM, at that time there is no screening devices that can show the exact pixels to match the images produced.
@@MaiElizabeth actually analogue does have a resolution. Both an angular resolution from the lens, as well as resolution from the grain size in the film itself.
Early full color film had pretty low resolution especially when compared to black and white film from the same time.
Regardless the Alexa classic is a digital camera not analog.
Nothing on 765, 435, 535? Nothing on Mini, nothing on LF? Nothing on public feedback or general appreciation on release that explain why they are so popular. What a pointless video
NO TO ROBOT VOICE!
PLUS .. NO to poor writing
What’s up with the random striped overlay??
I just read a book about a BBC sponsored British expedition that travelled across Zanzibar and Tanganyika (now Tanzania) in a 3 person hydrogen balloon in the early 1960's featuring an Arriflex camera ( see A. Smith, "Throw out Two Hands" , George Allen & Unwin, (1963) ). The appendix to the book mentioned the camera initially used 8-volt Varley batteries that proved 'spillable and heavy' until one of the cameramen improvised his own battery constructed of electronic flash unit cells, each with 3 floating balls to show the state of charge, embedded in foam rubber and encased in a small metal box that clipped onto the waistband of his trousers. The battery was chargeable from the Land Rover battery via a 12 volt stepdown built in series. They carried a range of 11 lenses for this camera: a 12.5mm Taylor Hobson lens; 40mm, 90 mm, 150mm, 300mm Kilfitt Kilar lenses; as well as 240mm and 400mm Novoflex lenses with follow-focus pistol grips. The film stock (courtesy of the BBC) consisted of 24,000 feet of Eastman Plus-X 16 mm negative film in 100 foot rolls; 24,000 feet of the same in 400 foot rolls; and 12,000 feet of Eastman Tri-X 16mm negative film. The sound recording was done on a Ficord midget tape-recorder.
thanks for sharing
Now before they go to Arri VR and have us experience a movie in 360 dimensions, which would be badass, I hope they build a digital+film combo camera
I love the Alexa 35 it makes it easy for hobbyists to get affordable Alexa Classics.
thanks for sharing
They had history on their side and they kept evolving. Only ARRI digital footage could come close to Film.
Thank you for sharing your thoughts. Please subscribe to our channel for more awesome contents.
and the closest prosumer camera would be blackmagic
Since I tried first blackmagic camera , always had feelings of strong dislike towards it!
Shadows were super disappointing , had to add more filling light to avoid information loss in shadows.
Not true, it took many iterations and continued development of digital before it gained enough quality, popularity and recognition to supplant film. On a linear scale, that change is pretty recent. But Arri is the brand most used in Hollywood cinema.
I don't want to be nit-picky, but the pictures from Munich are from 1945-1950. In the First World War, there were no bombed-out cities (1917); in 1924, WW1 was over for 6 years.
In 1941, World War II was not yet fought on German soil, so a picture of bombed-out Munich is also incorrect. In a film with a historic topic, such gross mistakes make the rest of the statements appear questionable as well.
I’ve always called the company Arriflex. Never considering that’s just the camera..
Isn't it pronounced "Arr-ree"? Not "Air-ree"?
Only if you’re German.
0:20
SS Rajamouli
I think Arri took a chance and moved forward with a new technology while others stayed stagnant. Just like Tesla was first to move forward with EVs.
Film and digital are totally different. But once what is best is established, no directors would want to settle for less than that title.
thanks for sharing
So much incorrect information. Just delete this video, do your research and then try again.
Why is that?
and use a real voice talent...no robo!
This is the point where you point out at least one example. Otherwise, your comment is just a voice in the wilderness.
Nairobi Half Life
huh?
Who is the Owner of ARRI.....?
Founders are August Arnold & Robert Richter.
Tchaikovsky was probably the worst background music you could have chosen. It completely destroyed your little movie.
Thanks for the feedback! We'll make sure to keep that in mind next time.
Too bad you didn't include a single reason to support your comment. Otherwise, it might have been constructive.
Outstanding history. Now all they need to do is make their cameras cheaper
Why on earth would they do that? As it would happen, Arri has released several cheaper models to compete with more popular brands
@krane15 forget it I changed my mind, keep the cameras, we have a.i. now
not another AI voice over... junk. bye!
that's not AI voice
please, please learn how to pronounce German words - including "ARRI"
Do you say that to Germans that produce content in English?
Remove that distracting horizontal lines at least from the arri footages. Let us see those footages as they are for fuck sake