An electrifying, powerful and sensitive achievement of directing, acting, cinematography, editing and production. It stands as a complimentary companion film to Dufeys' other phenomenal short film Vertiges.
This is a beautiful, sad, and gorgeously filmed story. The breakup, while painful, was inevitable. But when the kid is a bit older, if they both still have such strong feelings for one another, who knows.....
Triste, mais c'est la vie quand on traverse une telle ligne. The young man, who is precocious, finally says he still doesn't get the chemistry. I'm sure others understood that the chemistry problem is one of attraction. What draws two people to each other? What causes them to revolve around each other and holds them together? Who is the nucleus? Perhaps that isn't important. In this case, the atom is unstable and has to break apart. Fission creates a devastating, powerful nuclear explosion--the outburst on the stairs? For the young man, the explosion is clearly developing from the beginning of the film, a gradual melt-down of his core, yet fission solves the problem for each of them. The wonderful thing is that the young man works it all out, takes charge and then action to free them both from the impossibility of their attraction.
Their attraction to each other is not impossible. It is spontaneous, authentic and valid. The impossibility is due to the rigid societal limitations of their environment.
i dared hope bc it's a film but the moral of the story now and always is, don't give in and act on your attraction to your student/teacher. the suffering will be greater.
WELL, THIS DOES NOT HAVE TO BE BAD. I NOTICED A LOT OF YOU SAYING THAT TEACHER STUDENT RELATIONSHIPS ARE BAD THING. WELL, ALTHOUGH TEACHER STUDENT RELATIONSHIP ARE AWKWARD BECAUSE THEY HAVE CONFLICT OF INTEREST SITUATION, BUT ASIDE THAT, PHISICALLY IT IS NOT SUCH A BIG DEAL. THIS BOY LOOKS LIKE HE IS MOST LIKELY 17 YEARS OLD. IN MOST COUNTRIES IN THE WORLD YOU CAN HAVE RELATIONSHIP WITH PERSON OF AGE 17. IN MOST OF THE COUNTRIES LIMIT (THAT IS, AGE OF CONSENT) IS SOMEWHERE BETWEEN 14 AND 16 YEARS, AND THERE IS EVEN ONE COUNTRY WHERE LIMIT IS 11. ANYWAYS, UNLESS THEY LIVE IN COUNTRY WHERE 18 OR MORE IS MINIMAL AGE, THIS DOES NOT NECCESSERLY HAVE TO BE BAD. I THINK THAT THEY LOOK CUTE TOGETHER. IT IS NOT LIKE HE HAD RELATIONSHIP WITH A 12 YEAR OLD LIKE BOY FROM THE END OF THE MOVIE. SO, 17 IS OLD ENOUGH, AND IF WE PUT ASIDE STUDENT TEACHER RELATION, THEY COULD BE VERY NICE COUPLE. ☺
The age difference, which isn't very great, is not the issue. It is the social circumstances. Teachers cannot have this kind of relationship with their students. It is patently unfair and unequal. This kind of relationship usually, beyond the wrongness of it in the context, will only hurt one or the other or both of the parties involved. One of the bad outcomes is the jading of the younger person prematurely. Young people need to explore love and sex with their peers, not with the adults in their lives. Adults should always be safe havens for the young, not a source of turmoil and conflict. The amazing thing in this short film is the decision of the boy to leave, which is a very mature choice that saves them both. IMHO
@@Richard-zm6pt omfg... so peers of similar age are always sources of comfort, no turmoil, no conflict and unjadedness?... un fuckng believable. Sometimes older adults can be safe havens both intimately and platonically. Stop the hypocritical moralistic scolding and look at this film in the context of two adult humans whose genuine love and attraction for each other are destroyed by rigid societal taboos.
@@messengerpdx We see things a little differently or saw this story a little differently. I think you drew a lot of conclusions from what I wrote that do not reflect my own views and attitudes or mischaracterize my remarks. The word "always" doesn't apply to anything I said. Platonic relationships are not being discussed. I don't know how you can characterize me as hypocritical or moralistic, and I certainly wasn't scolding; I was musing about the situation. Your final point about the effect of societal taboos may be right, but I don't know.
@@Richard-zm6pt The words I chose in my response to your reply were over-reactive, mis-directed and hypocritically scolding in their own right, for which I apologize especially if they mis-characterize you. There were triggers in your response (as well as other replies in this thread) that initiated strong emotions and my response. While you started your reply with the inappropriateness of the relationship in the context of the student-teacher relationship in a high school setting(which I agree with you), your wording indicates a "wrongness" with the age difference outside of the school context that also has bad consequences...["beyond the wrongness of it in the context, will only hurt..."] "will only" as well as "one of the bad outcomes is the jading" came across as written-in-stone-definitive for an intergenerational relationship regardless of context. The way in which only negative wording(wrongness, jaded prematurely, sources of turmoil and conflict) is used for the intergenerational relationship while for age similar peers the wording is the positive "exploring love and sex" made me interpret your musings as an "always" judgment. Perhaps you've been hurt in a relationship by an older or younger person, which I respect your experience. Certainly my personal perspective, opinions and experience with intergenerational relationships formulates my response and interpretations of the film. Thank you for your response.
First off thanks for the English subtitles! To be honest not sure how to react to this short movie! Seems to be like a boarding school type setting for children of all age groups not exactly an appropriate place for anything to be going on between a grownup and a child and yes, he was a child! The fact that he is now missing out on his education because of an affair with a man there really sucks to be honest! Anyway, thanks for the short movie and touching on a sensitive subject for all to talk about and reflect on!
No, he is not a child. A child is pre-puberty and even puberty is an ambiguous delineation of desire and attraction. The young man you are calling a child initiated interactions based on sexual and emotional attractions...that's adult, regardless of how you think the older man should have responded. The fact that they are both missing out on love because of rigid societal taboos is what really sucks to be honest.
@@messengerpdx This is not Ancient Greece where the men took responsibility of the child or young man his housing education food clothing and so forth when an affair between an older man and someone younger took place! And it was clear in the dialog they had a sexual affair before this latest rejection the man admitted it was wrong and would not happen again if you paid attention.
Interesting, gritty, visceral, eerie and skin-crawling romantic short film. As gross as it is to think about, stories about teacher-student relationships just disgust me 🤮 If this was a story about two students falling in love, I would have enjoyed it more. The acting is good however. The end was sad even though I am not for older and younger partners in relationships. No doubt teachers and other people who have been in these scenarios can relate to the main characters.
@@金三胖-r3g You are right, it does happen a lot. Maybe since I personally never had a crush or was enamored by any of my teachers is why the relationship always unsettled me. No offense to you or anyone else who ever felt that but for me I just don't find any appeal to it.
Teacher student relationships have been going on for thousands of years. I'm not saying it's appropriate in all contexts but it's hardly skin-crawling and gross. What's gross is societal taboos that destroy a love and attraction between two individuals which is what I saw in this film.
@@messengerpdx I do see what you mean and am not stubborn to admit that such relationships are unsettling in all contexts. Also am in agreement with you on society's taboos towards people truly in love regardless of their sexual orientation. In the 3 years since I wrote my review, my opinion has gradually changed on the subject a bit.
This movie is bothed very good and too very disturbing to me. It is disturbing to me becaused ofed a way olders teacher having a relationship with a very youngers student which is sexual ined nature and that is wrong, even ifed does the student intiated it. Never even you cand tell ifed the student did to initiated it becaused a man very that older always does haved the advantages ined mental strategys ofed love and stuff. The olders man cand haved been "grooming" the by fore very a longed time so even the boy may be thinks it was his idea but it was not. Even ined the movie I do thinked they showed the teacher does to realize he is doing wrong. I do know it how very dangerous fore kids cand pedophiles and too hebephiles cand be. I am at 15 and when I was at 11 my #23 fosters father turned to be a pedophile and whened I did to say no he beated me to all ofed most deathed. I geted a TBI and haved to haved brains operation to lived and still do I haved brains damaging. Persons as that cand not control theirs desires and can kill kids because do they thinked their orgasm is more important thened yours life is. I did liked the movie because the teacher controlled his self even ifed the boy did wanted security ofed a relation with him. I was surprised fore seeing it that Benoît Cosaert only ever has doned one (1) movie, this one. I thought it he was very good an actor ined this movie and fore sure he had the looks fore getting attentions. May be he is decided to geted his education first or just he does not liked doing ofed it. Acshully now it has been 6 years though so probly he will not do any more which is too bad.
Antony Simpson Firstly, you haved maked mistake yours selfed so should you tell to me that stuff??? You do spell it RIGHT as ined writed stuff WRITE and NOT as RIGHT as dided YOU!!! Seconded, I did to tell it I haved brains damaging you incredible ofed jerk! I geted a TBI, probly you did not even looked up what is that. TBI = "Traumatic Brain Injury" I had a brains operation because my head geted cracked and I haved damaging ined there! THAT is why cand I not geted words as right. I cand not just go to over it because it does not looked as wrong to me! I amed a mute too because ofed it and I haved attention decifits too and I cand not walked as correct. Should I not tryd for walking to until I cand do it perfecter? I do haved aphasiac brains damaging a little. Here ised what does that mean fromed part ofed the letter did my doctor sended to my new fosters when they said I cand lived here now: "What Is Aphasia?." "Aphasia is a communication disorder that results from damage or injury to the language parts of the brain. In younger patients aphasia is usually the result of external trauma to the communications centers of the brain, however internal damage such as bleeding can also be a cause. Aphasia gets in the way of a person's ability to use or understand words. Aphasia does not impair the person's intelligence and teens may express feeling a sense of persecution when they are challenged regarding their ability to speak understandably. People who have aphasia may have difficulty speaking and finding the "right" words to complete their thoughts. They may also have problems understanding conversation, reading and comprehending written words, writing words, and using numbers." "The clinical picture of the disorder varies over different age groups and, in contrast to adults, children and teens show no consistent typology. In most of the cases there exists a disturbance of speech production; problems with writing and comprehension are seen as well as 'jargon' creation or refinement. The use of jargon can occur both in verbal and written forms of communication as well..." My therapys persons are who did to say I should come at here and writed a lot as I cand. My neuro doctor said it because I am youngers ifed I do keept to doing stuff my brain may be will maked new roads fore those that geted wrecked. Acshully ifed you do not liked how cand I writed stuff then may be you should not readed it. Thanked you so very ofed much fore yours useless castigating ofed how cand i do stuff.
Jo Cairo I am sorry , I did not see it yours commenting to until just about a days ago. Ifed did you say it that to me thened thanked you. I do not geted very ofed many persons to do complementing to me fore stuff. Acshully I do thinked it may be that is first very time I cand remember ofed it . Thanked you.
This movie is bothed very good and too very disturbing to me. It is disturbing to me becaused ofed a way olders teacher having a relationship with a very youngers student which is sexual ined nature and that is wrong, even ifed does the student intiated it. Never even you cand tell ifed the student did to initiated it becaused a man very that older always does haved the advantages ined mental strategys ofed love and stuff. The olders man cand haved been "grooming" the boy fore very a longed time so even the boy may be thinks it was his idea but it was not. Even ined the movie I do thinked they showed the teacher does to realize he is doing wrong. I do know it how very dangerous fore kids cand pedophiles and too hebephiles cand be. I am at 15 and when I was at 11 my #23 fosters father turned to be a pedophile and whened I did to say no he beated me to all ofed most deathed. I geted a TBI and haved to haved brains operation to lived and still do I haved brains damaging. Persons as that cand not control theirs desires and can kill kids because do they thinked their orgasm is more important thened yours life is. I did liked the movie becaused the teacher controlled himed self even ifed the boy did wanted security ofed a relation with him. I was surprised fore seeing it that Benoît Cosaert only ever has doned one (1) movie, this one. I thought it he was very good an actor ined this movie and fore sure he had the looks fore getting attentions. May be he is decided to geted his education first or just he does not liked doing ofed it. Acshully now it has been 6 years though so probly he will not do any more which is too bad. I haved writed this very the best cand I do. I am sorry ifed it is hard fore reading, still I haved troubles to maked words come out as right.
To at my room at here ond YT I do haved a place as " ABOUT " and at there my firends did to writed fore me my stuff so persons cand readed it. It is not being as ined huge ofed details. Whened I did to tryd that it geted too ofed long and geted thened does every one geted angery ofed THAT because it cand then geted 4 paged long ore even more. Never I haved saided all ofed what did to ALL happened. Him and too his firends did geted prisons and HE geted 67 ofed years ined prison but he is asked fore appeals and so now he does geted out to whened that getes done and still do I haved to hided.
![DISJONCTÉ - [Court Métrage]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/6TrO9s2rOUw/mqdefault.jpg)
I LOVE FRENCH MOVIES....ALWAYS SMART WITH A GREAT BALANCE OF PERSONALITY AND EXPRESION....REALLY BEAUTIFULL TO SEE....THANKS A LOT.
Maueo
It is belgian not french
An electrifying, powerful and sensitive achievement of directing, acting, cinematography, editing and production. It stands as a complimentary companion film to Dufeys' other phenomenal short film Vertiges.
Huge thank you for English subtitles!!!❤ This movie is a real masterpiece!❤
Thank you for this good movie.
This is a beautiful, sad, and gorgeously filmed story. The breakup, while painful, was inevitable. But when the kid is a bit older, if they both still have such strong feelings for one another, who knows.....
Many years later I'm still friends even though the initial spark of love is long extinguished.
production, acting/writing, direction, photography ..even sound, all are beautifully executed.
exceptional short.
Triste, mais c'est la vie quand on traverse une telle ligne.
The young man, who is precocious, finally says he still doesn't get the chemistry. I'm sure others understood that the chemistry problem is one of attraction. What draws two people to each other? What causes them to revolve around each other and holds them together? Who is the nucleus? Perhaps that isn't important. In this case, the atom is unstable and has to break apart.
Fission creates a devastating, powerful nuclear explosion--the outburst on the stairs? For the young man, the explosion is clearly developing from the beginning of the film, a gradual melt-down of his core, yet fission solves the problem for each of them.
The wonderful thing is that the young man works it all out, takes charge and then action to free them both from the impossibility of their attraction.
Their attraction to each other is not impossible. It is spontaneous, authentic and valid. The impossibility is due to the rigid societal limitations of their environment.
Great depth, dark, moving...superior production.
Tres beau
Hi may name is Adik my whatsapp +77711091073.
i dared hope bc it's a film but the moral of the story now and always is, don't give in and act on your attraction to your student/teacher. the suffering will be greater.
Through this film I learnt the English word "floorwalker" which is kind of a supervisor.
❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
I like this film
Very sad and realistic
Heartbreaking
Nice ❤❤
Nagyszerű film.
06:36: I know what he see in a mirror...
great short, good players
cold as ice
He said calm down baby boy more sex gay
What does Stone mean
Meant to say atome
Atoms
If it had a second part, it would be better
WELL, THIS DOES NOT HAVE TO BE BAD. I NOTICED A LOT OF YOU SAYING THAT TEACHER STUDENT RELATIONSHIPS ARE BAD THING. WELL, ALTHOUGH TEACHER STUDENT RELATIONSHIP ARE AWKWARD BECAUSE THEY HAVE CONFLICT OF INTEREST SITUATION, BUT ASIDE THAT, PHISICALLY IT IS NOT SUCH A BIG DEAL. THIS BOY LOOKS LIKE HE IS MOST LIKELY 17 YEARS OLD. IN MOST COUNTRIES IN THE WORLD YOU CAN HAVE RELATIONSHIP WITH PERSON OF AGE 17. IN MOST OF THE COUNTRIES LIMIT (THAT IS, AGE OF CONSENT) IS SOMEWHERE BETWEEN 14 AND 16 YEARS, AND THERE IS EVEN ONE COUNTRY WHERE LIMIT IS 11. ANYWAYS, UNLESS THEY LIVE IN COUNTRY WHERE 18 OR MORE IS MINIMAL AGE, THIS DOES NOT NECCESSERLY HAVE TO BE BAD.
I THINK THAT THEY LOOK CUTE TOGETHER. IT IS NOT LIKE HE HAD RELATIONSHIP WITH A 12 YEAR OLD LIKE BOY FROM THE END OF THE MOVIE.
SO, 17 IS OLD ENOUGH, AND IF WE PUT ASIDE STUDENT TEACHER RELATION, THEY COULD BE VERY NICE COUPLE. ☺
The age difference, which isn't very great, is not the issue. It is the social circumstances. Teachers cannot have this kind of relationship with their students. It is patently unfair and unequal. This kind of relationship usually, beyond the wrongness of it in the context, will only hurt one or the other or both of the parties involved. One of the bad outcomes is the jading of the younger person prematurely. Young people need to explore love and sex with their peers, not with the adults in their lives. Adults should always be safe havens for the young, not a source of turmoil and conflict. The amazing thing in this short film is the decision of the boy to leave, which is a very mature choice that saves them both. IMHO
@@Richard-zm6pt omfg... so peers of similar age are always sources of comfort, no turmoil, no conflict and unjadedness?... un fuckng believable. Sometimes older adults can be safe havens both intimately and platonically. Stop the hypocritical moralistic scolding and look at this film in the context of two adult humans whose genuine love and attraction for each other are destroyed by rigid societal taboos.
@@messengerpdx We see things a little differently or saw this story a little differently. I think you drew a lot of conclusions from what I wrote that do not reflect my own views and attitudes or mischaracterize my remarks. The word "always" doesn't apply to anything I said. Platonic relationships are not being discussed. I don't know how you can characterize me as hypocritical or moralistic, and I certainly wasn't scolding; I was musing about the situation. Your final point about the effect of societal taboos may be right, but I don't know.
@@Richard-zm6pt The words I chose in my response to your reply were over-reactive, mis-directed and hypocritically scolding in their own right, for which I apologize especially if they mis-characterize you. There were triggers in your response (as well as other replies in this thread) that initiated strong emotions and my response. While you started your reply with the inappropriateness of the relationship in the context of the student-teacher relationship in a high school setting(which I agree with you), your wording indicates a "wrongness" with the age difference outside of the school context that also has bad consequences...["beyond the wrongness of it in the context, will only hurt..."] "will only" as well as "one of the bad outcomes is the jading" came across as written-in-stone-definitive for an intergenerational relationship regardless of context. The way in which only negative wording(wrongness, jaded prematurely, sources of turmoil and conflict) is used for the intergenerational relationship while for age similar peers the wording is the positive "exploring love and sex" made me interpret your musings as an "always" judgment. Perhaps you've been hurt in a relationship by an older or younger person, which I respect your experience. Certainly my personal perspective, opinions and experience with intergenerational relationships formulates my response and interpretations of the film. Thank you for your response.
❤️
Très bon film
😮 😅😅❤❤
ow c'est super
When this film realized? So far behind 2023
Красиво и очень грустно
Jam Rodrigues5563471023890
Sim lindo demais
Profundo e triste! Ótimo roteiro e direção sensível. Atuações maravilhosas! Gostei muito!
🤗🤗
First off thanks for the English subtitles!
To be honest not sure how to react to this short movie!
Seems to be like a boarding school type setting for children of all age groups not exactly an appropriate place for anything to be going on between a grownup and a child and yes, he was a child!
The fact that he is now missing out on his education because of an affair with a man there really sucks to be honest!
Anyway, thanks for the short movie and touching on a sensitive subject for all to talk about and reflect on!
No, he is not a child. A child is pre-puberty and even puberty is an ambiguous delineation of desire and attraction. The young man you are calling a child initiated interactions based on sexual and emotional attractions...that's adult, regardless of how you think the older man should have responded. The fact that they are both missing out on love because of rigid societal taboos is what really sucks to be honest.
@@messengerpdx This is not Ancient Greece where the men took responsibility of the child or young man his housing education food clothing and so forth when an affair between an older man and someone younger took place! And it was clear in the dialog they had a sexual affair before this latest rejection the man admitted it was wrong and would not happen again if you paid attention.
@@daveb.4383 I was paying attention but with a different perspective, that's all.
BELO FILME😃💕👬💫💋❤🌍
realistic
Chimie 😅😂😂😂
feel so weird watch this
Attraction
Répulsion
Interesting, gritty, visceral, eerie and skin-crawling romantic short film. As gross as it is to think about, stories about teacher-student relationships just disgust me 🤮 If this was a story about two students falling in love, I would have enjoyed it more. The acting is good however. The end was sad even though I am not for older and younger partners in relationships. No doubt teachers and other people who have been in these scenarios can relate to the main characters.
French president Macron actually married his teacher. Actually it happens a lot. I had a huge crush on one of my teachers when I was in junior high.
@@金三胖-r3g You are right, it does happen a lot. Maybe since I personally never had a crush or was enamored by any of my teachers is why the relationship always unsettled me. No offense to you or anyone else who ever felt that but for me I just don't find any appeal to it.
Teacher student relationships have been going on for thousands of years. I'm not saying it's appropriate in all contexts but it's hardly skin-crawling and gross. What's gross is societal taboos that destroy a love and attraction between two individuals which is what I saw in this film.
@@messengerpdx I do see what you mean and am not stubborn to admit that such relationships are unsettling in all contexts. Also am in agreement with you on society's taboos towards people truly in love regardless of their sexual orientation. In the 3 years since I wrote my review, my opinion has gradually changed on the subject a bit.
This movie is bothed very good and too very disturbing to me. It is disturbing to me becaused ofed a way olders teacher having a relationship with a very youngers student which is sexual ined nature and that is wrong, even ifed does the student intiated it. Never even you cand tell ifed the student did to initiated it becaused a man very that older always does haved the advantages ined mental strategys ofed love and stuff. The olders man cand haved been "grooming" the by fore very a longed time so even the boy may be thinks it was his idea but it was not. Even ined the movie I do thinked they showed the teacher does to realize he is doing wrong. I do know it how very dangerous fore kids cand pedophiles and too hebephiles cand be. I am at 15 and when I was at 11 my #23 fosters father turned to be a pedophile and whened I did to say no he beated me to all ofed most deathed. I geted a TBI and haved to haved brains operation to lived and still do I haved brains damaging. Persons as that cand not control theirs desires and can kill kids because do they thinked their orgasm is more important thened yours life is.
I did liked the movie because the teacher controlled his self even ifed the boy did wanted security ofed a relation with him. I was surprised fore seeing it that Benoît Cosaert only ever has doned one (1) movie, this one. I thought it he was very good an actor ined this movie and fore sure he had the looks fore getting attentions. May be he is decided to geted his education first or just he does not liked doing ofed it. Acshully now it has been 6 years though so probly he will not do any more which is too bad.
Antony Simpson
Firstly, you haved maked mistake yours selfed so should you tell to me that stuff??? You do spell it RIGHT as ined writed stuff WRITE and NOT as RIGHT as dided YOU!!!
Seconded, I did to tell it I haved brains damaging you incredible ofed jerk! I geted a TBI, probly you did not even looked up what is that. TBI = "Traumatic Brain Injury"
I had a brains operation because my head geted cracked and I haved damaging ined there! THAT is why cand I not geted words as right. I cand not just go to over it because it does not looked as wrong to me! I amed a mute too because ofed it and I haved attention decifits too and I cand not walked as correct. Should I not tryd for walking to until I cand do it perfecter? I do haved aphasiac brains damaging a little. Here ised what does that mean fromed part ofed the letter did my doctor sended to my new fosters when they said I cand lived here now:
"What Is Aphasia?."
"Aphasia is a communication disorder that results from damage or injury to the language parts of the brain. In younger patients aphasia is usually the result of external trauma to the communications centers of the brain, however internal damage such as bleeding can also be a cause. Aphasia gets in the way of a person's ability to use or understand words. Aphasia does not impair the person's intelligence and teens may express feeling a sense of persecution when they are challenged regarding their ability to speak understandably. People who have aphasia may have difficulty speaking and finding the "right" words to complete their thoughts. They may also have problems understanding conversation, reading and comprehending written words, writing words, and using numbers."
"The clinical picture of the disorder varies over different age groups and, in contrast to adults, children and teens show no consistent typology. In most of the cases there exists a disturbance of speech production; problems with writing and comprehension are seen as well as 'jargon' creation or refinement. The use of jargon can occur both in verbal and written forms of communication as well..."
My therapys persons are who did to say I should come at here and writed a lot as I cand. My neuro doctor said it because I am youngers ifed I do keept to doing stuff my brain may be will maked new roads fore those that geted wrecked. Acshully ifed you do not liked how cand I writed stuff then may be you should not readed it. Thanked you so very ofed much fore yours useless castigating ofed how cand i do stuff.
You're amazing!
Jo Cairo I am sorry , I did not see it yours commenting to until just about a days ago. Ifed did you say it that to me thened thanked you. I do not geted very ofed many persons to do complementing to me fore stuff. Acshully I do thinked it may be that is first very time I cand remember ofed it . Thanked you.
Take english as a subject next term.
Bonsoir je suis gay recherche un mec
Moi aussi
37k
more slow.............................................
Proffesor mérite aller en prison
V
Frenchcore presente anche nei film gay😂
This movie is bothed very good and too very disturbing to me. It is disturbing to me becaused ofed a way olders teacher having a relationship with a very youngers student which is sexual ined nature and that is wrong, even ifed does the student intiated it. Never even you cand tell ifed the student did to initiated it becaused a man very that older always does haved the advantages ined mental strategys ofed love and stuff. The olders man cand haved been "grooming" the boy fore very a longed time so even the boy may be thinks it was his idea but it was not. Even ined the movie I do thinked they showed the teacher does to realize he is doing wrong. I do know it how very dangerous fore kids cand pedophiles and too hebephiles cand be. I am at 15 and when I was at 11 my #23 fosters father turned to be a pedophile and whened I did to say no he beated me to all ofed most deathed. I geted a TBI and haved to haved brains operation to lived and still do I haved brains damaging. Persons as that cand not control theirs desires and can kill kids because do they thinked their orgasm is more important thened yours life is.
I did liked the movie becaused the teacher controlled himed self even ifed the boy did wanted security ofed a relation with him. I was surprised fore seeing it that Benoît Cosaert only ever has doned one (1) movie, this one. I thought it he was very good an actor ined this movie and fore sure he had the looks fore getting attentions. May be he is decided to geted his education first or just he does not liked doing ofed it. Acshully now it has been 6 years though so probly he will not do any more which is too bad.
I haved writed this very the best cand I do. I am sorry ifed it is hard fore reading, still I haved troubles to maked words come out as right.
JacobsParry it's quite devastating to read what you've been through.
anyways, stay tough, buddy 😉 hope you get better n better everyday ☺
I amed sorry. I do very the best I cand do but even at when it does looked good fore me it does not fore others
To at my room at here ond YT I do haved a place as " ABOUT " and at there my firends did to writed fore me my stuff so persons cand readed it. It is not being as ined huge ofed details. Whened I did to tryd that it geted too ofed long and geted thened does every one geted angery ofed THAT because it cand then geted 4 paged long ore even more. Never I haved saided all ofed what did to ALL happened. Him and too his firends did geted prisons and HE geted 67 ofed years ined prison but he is asked fore appeals and so now he does geted out to whened that getes done and still do I haved to hided.
+JacobsParry es el padre o hase de amante. 😊
How do you feel now