Deep Diving Vynnset for APES

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 2 ต.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 32

  • @Kriptini
    @Kriptini ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I don't think you can get two action points off a single Eloquence token. Eloquence needs to destroy itself in order to give the NAA go again. So even though you might trigger a single Eloquence twice, I don't think you should be able to get go again on both NAAs with it.

    • @SavageLandsNews
      @SavageLandsNews  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Here are the rules from the great book itself. This has been confirmed by my judge friend and the judge discord at this point. So I am pretty confident
      1.7.9a Activated-layers and triggered-layers exist independently of their source. If the source of an
      activated-layer or triggered-layer ceases to exist, it does not prevent the resolution of that layer.
      5.3.2c If the resolution of a layer generates two or more effects, effects are generated immediately and
      in the order specified by the resolution abilities. If any generated effect fails, the remaining effects
      continue to be generated.

    • @SavageLandsNews
      @SavageLandsNews  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You can even get more tricky bc shadow NAAs trigger Vynnset so you can organize the layers with even more control not that it makes too much of a difference but you can. So you can layer NAA Vynn eloquence if you felt like it.

    • @Kriptini
      @Kriptini ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@SavageLandsNews You're right, I just checked the release notes which confirms: "If Eloquence is destroyed before its trigger resolves, it will still give the non-attack action card go again, because it is not conditional on destroying the token."

    • @SavageLandsNews
      @SavageLandsNews  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@Kriptini thanks for checking!

  • @DMArmada
    @DMArmada ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Haha I have a video going out tomorrow describing this exact combo, wish I would have seen that you already covered it 😅

  • @cappadocius9379
    @cappadocius9379 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The fact it doesn't consume the Runechants for Runegate still amazes me.

    • @SavageLandsNews
      @SavageLandsNews  ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Would make her pretty bad tbh but yeah free value as a hero power seems to be a runeblade thing lol

  • @devonwong6471
    @devonwong6471 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Love the breakdown. She looks Interesting. Look forward to your take on her.

  • @paulmoran8530
    @paulmoran8530 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This looks super good, would love to see some gameplay with the eloquence play lines … action points for days and rune gates wiiiide open 🎉

  • @marcelbehncke900
    @marcelbehncke900 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You are sooooo cool 😊 thank you for this cool Video my King 😃

  • @sukrpunch
    @sukrpunch ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Breaking the chain is something I had to learn to do with Levia to get more cards into grave for a final push

  • @sukrpunch
    @sukrpunch ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Does Rattle bones not fit the cost curve? Seems like a good card to add action points and extend combos even further by banishing a runegate from grave

  • @PhantomXavier
    @PhantomXavier ปีที่แล้ว

    One of the best commentated matches I've ever watched. I was laughing most of the video. I'm in.

  • @xChroHD
    @xChroHD ปีที่แล้ว +2

    really good content !!

  • @stigmurder99
    @stigmurder99 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    💪💪💪

  • @daylinlevin8394
    @daylinlevin8394 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    AM MONKEY

  • @Wosho1982
    @Wosho1982 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Interesting ideas but is int autloose vs ice lexi and islander?

    • @SavageLandsNews
      @SavageLandsNews  ปีที่แล้ว

      I would rely on cost reduction by runechants to fix that. Kinda how vis deals with it. But the sideboard is not done at all 🤣

    • @FranzPlaysFaB
      @FranzPlaysFaB ปีที่แล้ว

      the problem is though that Runegate is a replacement cost. cost in FaB is calculated the following way: alternative cost, cost increase, cost decrease. So Frostbites hurt Runegate alot :(

  • @nekowolf1444
    @nekowolf1444 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    So I’m a bit confused about this tech. When the eloquence token is added to the layer in the example, does its destruction resolve between the two funeral moons or after both resolve? I thought the eloquence token would be added to the layer after the first funeral Moon and be destroyed between them?? Maybe I’m missing something.

    • @SavageLandsNews
      @SavageLandsNews  ปีที่แล้ว

      You can respond before the destruction takes place since it's added to the layers. So basically you get to play the card with GA - it resolves and the destruction of the token goes into the stack. You can then play at instant speed another NAA and since the eloquence token has not been destroyed yet you gain it's benefits

    • @nekowolf1444
      @nekowolf1444 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@SavageLandsNews okay, so it goes like this -> non attack action, eloquence pop, respond to eloquence pop at instant speed and gain another action point?

    • @SavageLandsNews
      @SavageLandsNews  ปีที่แล้ว

      @@nekowolf1444 simplistically yes!

    • @nekowolf1444
      @nekowolf1444 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@SavageLandsNews thank you for the clarification!!!

  • @marlenegalicia9987
    @marlenegalicia9987 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You cute 🥰

  • @Sir-Render
    @Sir-Render ปีที่แล้ว

    only problem is how you gonna that many banish cards. if it take 3 turn to stack 3 card then you gonna take 1+2+3 which is 6 from blood debt

  • @bigboyboobs
    @bigboyboobs ปีที่แล้ว +1

    🥈