Motorweek 2009 Dodge Journey Road Test

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 30 ก.ย. 2024
  • Motorweek 2009 Dodge Journey Road Test. I don't own this video.

ความคิดเห็น • 17

  • @chriscornelius2518
    @chriscornelius2518 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Its not the aesthetics, features, options, or the reputation. It is the lack of longevity and reliability for Chrysler brand

    • @damilolaakanni
      @damilolaakanni 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      They left it to linger on without a redesign, which was what Dodge did to pretty much every other car in their lineup. It only got a refresh in 2011 when it got the 3.6 to replace the 3.5 V6.

  • @sterlingstauffer2915
    @sterlingstauffer2915 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    I’m really surprised the dodge journey body style was used so long. Over 10 years.

    • @damilolaakanni
      @damilolaakanni 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      It needed a redesign around 2014/2015. Car came out in 2009, was refreshed in 2011. Three years later and it should have been redesigned completely.

  • @ForgotToMentionThat
    @ForgotToMentionThat 4 วันที่ผ่านมา

    This car had so much potential.

  • @FeartheCyr611
    @FeartheCyr611 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    In 2014, I knew someone who had a 2011 Journey (refreshed) and I loved that car
    I still see this car out on the road today, and am reminded of that person

  • @jacobyo99
    @jacobyo99 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    These are horrible cars but I have always liked those wheels

    • @jlcii
      @jlcii 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The only reliable part of the car LOL

    • @sirot5561
      @sirot5561 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Totally agree! My coworker had one and the engine caught on fire 🔥😮

    • @MiggyCR
      @MiggyCR 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It’s always been an attractive car to me, but the drivetrain was absolutely terrible.

  • @scottbuchele4814
    @scottbuchele4814 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Talks about the 4 cylinder, shows a Volvo engine😂

  • @jlcii
    @jlcii 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Wow, I never realized how misogynistic the automotive world was for the longest time. I love how he implies that minivans were only found repulsive by fathers, insinuating that all mothers sincerely loved and wanted one. My Mom hated minivans, and you couldn't pay her to get one unless she absolutely have no choice. And this is while being a mom to five kids. For her, it was SUV or bust, and she wasn't the only mom that I knew of that had a strong disdain for the minivan. I take it the writers of the show didn't talk to many women when it came to what we actually like vehicle wise.

    • @ScarletKnightmare
      @ScarletKnightmare 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      😂

    • @joestuff8
      @joestuff8 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      No. His insinuation falls into the idea that men always want something sporty or not practical. While women usually didn't care *most* of the time what automobile they drove. Point A to B.
      The crossover allowed a blend of both worlds. Men got a more "rugged, sporty, and visually more appealing vehicle.
      That's it. There are stats for a reason. Believe it or not, manufacturers *use* this to capitalize and profit.
      Not everything needs to be spun into some sort of issue. Unless you wanna go and *look* for it...

    • @ScarletKnightmare
      @ScarletKnightmare 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@joestuff8 You're arguing with a bot. Whether or not it's an actual bot or a human programmed into a bot doesn't actually matter. Once you realize these people's vote cancels yours and that Jacobins occupy the highest levels of power and institutions, you may find wisdom in preparing a first world zone for yourself in the rapidly approaching third world state they'll bring about. When they get what they want you will be relatively intact while unfortunately (?) they will not.

    • @ForgotToMentionThat
      @ForgotToMentionThat 4 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@ScarletKnightmarewhat is the heck did you just say in all that text?!?