Watch NASA's Artemis 1 Orion fly over Apollo landing sites.
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 5 ธ.ค. 2022
- On Monday, as part of the last phases of the Artemis 1 mission, NASA's Orion spacecraft flew past the moon once again, affording breathtaking views of Earth and our planetary neighbour.
Orion made its last close encounter to the moon, flying past the moon's far side at a speed of around 4,800 mph. The spacecraft's cameras recorded Earth as it rose above the horizon and looped around the moon after Orion had completed its last flyby.
Ever since its Nov. 16 launch from NASA's Kennedy Space Center, the spacecraft's array of cameras has been transmitting live footage of the moon and Earth back to Earth.
At 11:43 a.m. EST, the orbital manoeuvre engine fired for 3 minutes and 27 seconds, successfully completing the return-powered flyby (RPF) run and setting Orion on course for a splashdown in the Pacific Ocean on December 11.
According to NASA officials, the Orion spacecraft sailed over several of the Apollo landing sites during its last lunar flyby, which brought the spacecraft to within around 80 miles of the moon's surface.
While Orion was on the far side of the moon 30 minutes before the flyby, NASA lost contact with it.
The view of the lunar craters and features, as well as the planet Earth, that Orion saw after the link was reestablished with the Deep Space Network, was stunning. This perspective will be accessible once again when NASA astronauts do the same orbit around the moon during the Artemis II mission.
In order to go back to Earth, Orion has to go through a sequence of engine burns. A 45-second "departure burn" from a "distant retrograde orbit" (DRO) occurred last week, marking the beginning of the spacecraft's journey home.
The spaceship has started its return trip to Earth.
The spacecraft's sensors snapped the last close-up images of the moon as it started its departure from the lunar surface.
On the morning of December 11 at around 11 a.m., Orion will splash down in the Pacific Ocean off the coast of San Diego, California, where rescue crews from the United States Navy will be standing by.
For NASA's Orion capsule recovery, favourable weather conditions include calm seas, light winds, and no precipitation.
Even though there won't be any people on board Artemis 1, the mission will serve as a dress rehearsal for Artemis II, when NASA hopes to send two astronauts on a circumlunar voyage aboard Orion. The next step is Artemis III, the first lunar landing by humans in half a century.
Join this channel to get access to perks:
/ @nasaspacenewsagency
#artemis #orion #apollo #moonflyby #nasa #nasaspacenews
Did we actually get to see those Apollo landing sites or did I miss it. Title felt like click bait
It was a fly over... don't expect to see Apollo artifacts from that altitude.
@Charles X The Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) took good photos of all SIX Apollo Landing Sites already.
@@AWLor0 you must be joking...
BOOM!!!
--Buzz Aldrin TOLD the TRUTH about the Moon Landing
odysee.com/@ErwachenMitMarcus:c/Buzz-Aldrin-TOLD-the-TRUTH-about-the-Moon-Landing:2
--Buzz Aldrin asked about the moon landing
odysee.com/@czr5014:3/BuzzAldrinAdmits:2
--MOON LANDING FRAUD - DEATHBED CONFESSION
odysee.com/@TruthVault:0/DEATHBED-CONFESSION:f
--MOON LANDING HOAX CONFESSION
odysee.com/@DarioGomez:c/MOON-LANDING-HOAX-CONFESSION---MM16-(1080p_25fps_H264-128kbit_AAC):6
--Apollo 11 news conference
th-cam.com/video/ZzhyZQGAmzU/w-d-xo.html
--A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon
odysee.com/@psalm19:6/A-Funny-Thing-Happened-on-the-Way-to-the-Moon:19
--American Moon (2017) - by Massimo Mazzucco
odysee.com/@QuantumRhino:9/American-Moon-(2017):1
--Kubrick's Odyssey: Secrets Hidden in the Films of Stanley Kubrick; Part One: Kubrick and Apollo
odysee.com/@AngelWhite:c/Kubricks-Odyssey-I-Kubrick-and-Apollo-2011:d
***
Total clickbait again.
We had a orbiter do exceptionally close up pics of the moon. NASA web sites should have these close ups. I think some are here on TH-cam, just have to search and find them. They were done years ago just for the next landing missions. Those missions are what’s happening now! They are worth the time finding them. I don’t know what type of cameras are on the Orion.
I can’t believe we are returning to the moon! With so many delays and operational changes, It seemed so far away.
Now it’s just 2 missions away! With luck, that’s 2025🎉!
PEACE
LOVE
CALM
UNITY
HONESTY
PROSPERITY
FREE THINKING
GOOD HEALTH
RESPECT
KINDNESS
HAPPINESS
WISDOM
SOBRIETY
OPTIMISM
@@sanbruno6010 everything except for sobriety…within reason.
@@phillm156 😂
Wish we had more real time info on the trip but it is amazing.
Incredible. I wish I was younger so I could see all this happening over next 50 years
PEACE
LOVE
CALM
UNITY
HONESTY
PROSPERITY
FREE THINKING
GOOD HEALTH
RESPECT
KINDNESS
HAPPINESS
WISDOM
SOBRIETY
OPTIMISM
@@sanbruno6010 what in the hell are you talking about?
Prepare for conspiracy theorists to enter this reply section.
@@jetpond7904 Only an idiot would believe this crap. NASA already claimed they couldn't get back to the moon. You NASA nerds are dumb as phuc.
@@czarcastic1458 so that mission that actually just ended yesterday was all fake hm?
For the 7272763741528th time, it’s the MONEY they didn’t have.
Great video. I will definitely be following Artemis's progress.
PEACE
LOVE
CALM
UNITY
HONESTY
PROSPERITY
FREE THINKING
GOOD HEALTH
RESPECT
KINDNESS
HAPPINESS
WISDOM
SOBRIETY
OPTIMISM
Good to see that this costly mission at least 'put to bed' the arguments about whether they really DID land on The Moon. . . . Oh hang on !
NASA astronauts are not doing the same very large orbit as this. The Artemis II crew will travel only 4,600 miles beyond the far side of the Moon. Artemis I is a mission meant to stress test the equipment.
PEACE
LOVE
CALM
UNITY
HONESTY
PROSPERITY
FREE THINKING
GOOD HEALTH
RESPECT
KINDNESS
HAPPINESS
WISDOM
SOBRIETY
OPTIMISM
One word. AWESOME!
Remember the moon landings well, I was 13. Looking forward to detailed photos of Apollo landing sites as 80km, no atmosphere is not far for powerful cameras on Artemis.
That is not the actually purpose of the Artemis 1 Moon Mission. That's already be done by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO)
The Artemis 1 Orion capsule has made 'splashdown' in the Pacific Ocean off the coast of Baja California. Mission is a success.
HAHA Yeah right.
@@czarcastic1458 ◁== Oh Oh. Another Hoaxtard
@@apolloskyfacer5842 No i am a critical thinker and you are a NASA sheep. Prove we went to the moon again. All i see is the same regurgitated cgi from 1969. You NASA nuts believe in magic physics. like i said prove we went to the moon. I will wait for your proof squirt.
@@apolloskyfacer5842 HAHA Another little tiny Earth. Go back to sleep peewee.
@@czarcastic1458 Your Utube name and critical thinker should never be seen together. Sadly for you, Modern History is what it is. NOT what you think or wish it to be. And the SIX Apollo Moon Landing Missions are a series of astonishing events in that history. Best you get used to the Reality of that Hoaxtard.
Not going to lie, it seems odd to be this timid about landing on the moon again with the level of tech improvement over the past 50 years. 🤷
The Artemis 1 Moon Mission team are going through the same involved testing missions as the original Apollo Moon Missions. I guess you don't know about the Mercury and Gemini missions. These were the predecessors to the Apollo program. And the early Apollo missions were also test flights (6 & 7)
All work is hard. Technical work like landing on the moon is INSANELY hard. NEVER EVER pre-assume some sort of sociological model whereby labor and technology "only gets monotonically easier with time".
Artemis. Broca's area, or the Broca area is a region in the frontal lobe of the dominant hemisphere, usually the left, of the brain with functions linked to speech production. 2/8/2021 and I lived again. Broca's aphasia (non-fluent aphasia) Mike Caputo, Year 1 Stroke Recovery, Up Up Up - Aphasia with attitude, Broca's Aphasia, Right-side Weakness, Mark's 22 years-old Stroke: Broca's Aphasia.
PEACE
LOVE
CALM
UNITY
HONESTY
PROSPERITY
FREE THINKING
GOOD HEALTH
RESPECT
KINDNESS
HAPPINESS
WISDOM
SOBRIETY
OPTIMISM
So NASA, quick question. Did you forget to take detailed pictures of the “landing sites” and “stuff” left there? I mean it is 2023, the technology exists, and you did just literally fly by them. How about the radiation sensor data inside the Orion capsule. Anything to share with the public?
That was not the purpose of the Artemis 1 Moon Mission. The Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) has already done that.
This video wasn't made by NASA. The title is clickbait. NASA never said they were doing flyovers or taking images of any landing sites. You loon.
Check channel description. This channel is not affiliated with NASA.
1 time in 50 years burn 93 billion for mobile phone camera quality with no zoom and tele photo at 100 km close and not see anything on apollo landing site
yes ,it's a bit strange......
No need to. The Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) has already taken photos of all the Apollo Landing Sites.
compare with a famous moon photo from youtuber who use only 1,000 dollar 16m pixel nikkon p1000 at 384,403 km from moon can tele and zoom much more with high quality than 93 billion dollar orion 's camera at only 100 km far from moon ?
@@yoskarokuto3553 You're ranting on too soon. Hopefully the Orion capsule will survive re-entry into the Earths atmosphere and it's then that real high resolution images will be available. Then, perhaps, hopefully. you'll be happy with the results.
@@apolloskyfacer5842 hopefully makes it through our atmosphere? Are we still that primitive in space tech? This whole project is a scam
This footage is stunning
CGI is stunning! Check out the CGI in these videos: #tommacdonald I especially like the CGI alien spacecraft in the song End of the World. It's more believable than this B.S.
Would be also nice to revisit the apollo landing sites. No animations but live recordings of the sites instead.
No such site.all hoax
I'm an Apollo believer for the simple reason they happened..8 actual Apollo missions...6 landings over three years, all verified by the Russians...I guess we need to wait for Artemis 2 to finally prove that humans can survive outside earth's orbit
Compared with the ride that Armstrong, Aldrin, and Collins had, this new capsule/command module makes theirs look like a model T Ford! Any chance of spotting the debris/equipment left behind by any of the Apollo missions?
The Moon is huge. The Lunar surface area is about 14.6 million square miles (38 million square km), which is less than the total surface area of the continent of Asia (17.2 million square miles or 44.5 million square km) To see any debris is a big 'ask'
trying to land this time for real on this side to make sure we can see though a telescope ?
@Babanna Suresh: Jim Jones and David Koresh attracted followers who were losers. Want some friendly advice, Babanna? When they start mixing the kool aid at the next meeting of the cult that ur in, know where the exits are. And don't bother answering this--as ur goofy comments do not dignify a response.
O chance there was no moon landing otherwise nasa would have made it priority to view the so called landing site.all a hollywood stunt.
I seen 2 moons , one was up close u can see the craters and if u look in the left corner u see a crescent moon real fast the camera moved
why is it just going about 3000 MPH now back to earth as shown on other sites here. seems like it would be going about 25,000 MPH
They were going Mach ten through the atmosphere at one point just before splashdown! Fast enough for you? They probably hit the atmosphere close to what you said. Apollo hit at right around 25,000 coming back. I remember all the missions!
Will also be looking forward to Spacex sending the Everyday Astronaut (Tim) and his reporting and videoing from lunar orbit in 2023. Exciting times. 🙂
That will be awesome!! Probably won’t happen in 2023 but it will be great!!!
Deceptive title.
Amazing
what is amazing? most of the video is CGI - computer graphics images.
I guess NASA fired up the blue screen and old footage from the LOLA days.
I guess you're having problems 'firing up' your thinking processes. Don't worry, take your time. We'll wait.
where are the fotos?
they lost contact when in the dsark side of the moon but they still have contact with Voyager 1 & 2?
Far side actually. At 'New Moon' the dark side is facing straight towards us. I can't understand what you're on about concerning the Voyagers.
Neither voyager probe has gigatons of rock between them and the Deep Space Network.
Please change your display picture you're not woke.
Voyager would have been out of contact when there was a planet in the way 🙄
Do you expect a data transmission to go through a 3.400km in diameter rock from an altitude 30 times less than the moon's diameter? and not from vast interstellar space were you can transmit data to everywhere?
Is there a place where we can see the full moon fly-by in HD (during the time the earth had no contact)?
No because it's fake there is no footage like that it's been back for a month it takes 2 minutes to upload it
Why can't NASA send lunarsynchronic satellites around the moon, so that future craft can bounce signals off those satellites back to hear, so that we won't lose contact with the craft when it goes behind the moon?
Wonder about fly over another landing Site no information
I think it are weird that a simple "zoom in" could have silent the many sceptics, and although I am not of of them, it was a missed opportunity to, in real time, show the Apollo landing site.
The Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) has shown them already. That is not the purpose of the Artemis 1 Moon Mission.
PEACE
LOVE
CALM
UNITY
HONESTY
PROSPERITY
FREE THINKING
GOOD HEALTH
RESPECT
KINDNESS
HAPPINESS
WISDOM
SOBRIETY
OPTIMISM
@@apolloskyfacer5842 You know where I can find those. Would like to have a ref. next time I meet a sceptic online. I still though think it was a missed opportunity. Many watched this mission online and a simple zoom function could have been both fun and valuable.
@@sanbruno6010 Transitioning to a fossil free energy production and usage and you will achieve much of it. The constant flow of big money from the Western world to journalist/politician killing dictators like POOtin, Xi, Bin Salman (financing their illegal wars) makes no sense when off shore windmill parks and hydrogen production are cheaper and emission free. Intelligence on earth, yes please.
@@Mike-zx1kx CONCERNING THE LUNAR RECONNAISSANCE ORBITER. Here is how to see all the Apollo Landing Sites. Download the feature LROC: QuickMap and then click on the Overlays icon on the left of the screen. Then click on the LROC Featured Images. Then type in the word Apollo and 12 targets will be displayed. Click on the Apollos 11 / 12 / 14 / 15 / 16 and 17 listings and then go to the top right of the screen and using the +, zoom in until the distance bar on the lower right of the screen shows 100 meters / or 50 Meters. In the case of Apollo 15 for example , not only will you see the lower base section of the Lunar Lander but even the Lunar Rover will be visible where it was abandoned. Also visible are the wheel marks of the Rover. and even more smaller items but they are difficult to pick out. The LROC took images like this from 15 kms above the surface during the low point of it's Lunar obit. *Note. Don't use the zoom on your keyboard or the wheel on your mouse. As mentioned. Use the + on the top right of the your screen.
Why does Earth look so small in the pictures?
Learn all about photography. And if you want to try a bit of photography yourself, wait until the Full Moon is rising above the horizon. Notice how huge it looks. Now take a photo of it. Notice in the photograph, the Moon now looks quite small.
@@apolloskyfacer5842 I am a photographer and videographer full-time media producer I know all about cameras and pictures and videos and photos and again that doesn't explain why Earth which is so much bigger than the moon looks so small in these pictures from the moon doesn't make sense at all
@@crazybabytvworld Your comment proves that you did not fully understand what I was saying. And that you did not do what I suggested. Surely you must realize that it all depends on what lens is being used.
@@crazybabytvworld obviously you don’t know all about cameras, lenses etc.
PEACE
LOVE
CALM
UNITY
HONESTY
PROSPERITY
FREE THINKING
GOOD HEALTH
RESPECT
KINDNESS
HAPPINESS
WISDOM
SOBRIETY
OPTIMISM
So are we going to be able to see what was visible on the dark side of the moon?
Or just because we lost signal we don't get to see that
What do you mean by 'dark side' of the Moon. Surely you must realize that at New Moon, the dark side is facing straight at us. If you really want to see what is on the FAR SIDE of the moon, go have a look at what the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) produced.
@@apolloskyfacer5842 No, every 27.3 days, the moon spins on its axis and completes one planet's orbit. It indicates that even though the moon rotates, one of its faces is always pointed in our direction. This phenomenon, called “synchronous rotation,” explains why humans can never see the far side of the Moon from Earth.
Apollo sky farcery
Your own mainstream beliefs say this and preach it come now
@@battlethebollocksrodgers9173 Well what do you think I was saying ? Best you read my comment again. And this time, try doing your best to comprehend it. Your original comment is completely wrong.
@@apolloskyfacer5842 wow Puff up your chest a little more sky facer
What's it like being the ultimate go-to guy for moon knowledge?
No one gives a s*** No one gives two s****
Everyone just larps around all day long in their little bubbles so I don't care to dissect and comprehend your nonsense
@@apolloskyfacer5842 Nice NASA logo you slave.
Thank God for Vernor von Braun
I mean if it wasn't for his expertise and rockets he might have just faced punishment for his role
Baaaaaaa
My God defeats your god Apollo
Wow amazing still no clear images of the landing sites.
Maybe there were images but they were accidently destroyed in a similar way to the Apollo technical details/ photos. Unlucky
Never any stars…. You’d think they’d be really bright with no atmosphere in the way but somehow they never show up in these video/pictures .
Learn all about film exposure rates and lens apertures. Or just keep right on making ignorant comments on a public forum for all to see. 😎
The problem they have is dynamic range, the problem you have is lack of reading and finding out why………
You realize,
1. The sun’s light is WAY BRIGHTER than the stars.
2. Learn about exposure.
All work is hard. Technical work like landing on the moon is INSANELY hard. NEVER EVER pre-assume some sort of sociological model whereby labor and technology "only gets monotonically easier with time".
going back to the moon. WAY TO LONG.
The quality is worse than 1969 what's up with that
Going to the moon and space is very cool but I can not believe after 50 yrs later we are still going to space and the moon in the same way and the same type of rockets ????? In 50 yrs we did not make a better type of space craft that can go to and from space ????????
Amazing??? Uhhh Not a pic to show...lol
Fifty years have passed and the same bad images and videos of the Apollo generation. What are they hiding so much?
They will have higher resolution images/videos once the capsule is retrieved.
@@Armis71 I`m not so sure that the capsule will stay in function because never ever a capsule entry in the atmosphere were so fast. I hope we will be informed about and not cheated with any other capsule.I do not beleave anything the US says.
There wss no moon landing all hollywood hoax, but there are millions of dumbass brainless people think there ws a moon landing ,never believe the warmonger america remember wmds of saddam hussein
@@Yusuf-my5qo No moon landing ever, just US lie propaganda. Munchhausens big tales. But now they waste our money to try it ... its senseless.
Just Send 1 lunar robot to explore Apollo landing site , finally you can see everything about Apollo mission must be there...really ??? 😁
Why, Just so you can still claim it's all fake ?
I didn't see anything remotely close to a view of any Apollo landing sites. One, because Apollo was total fiction and never happened. and two, because Artimus / Orion came back looking like a beer can that got chugged, crushed and tossed in a bonfire...
Your brain is total fiction
@@ythinder That took a lot of guts to say. I'm sure Nasa would be glad to have someone like you on their team
@Aaron Fannin Mankind's greatest achievements will never be tainted in the face of your personal incredulity
@@ythinder 🌔
At last ! The definitive proof we've all been waiting for, that the SIX Apollo Moon Landing Missions didn't actually happen ! Thank you Mr Fannin, for your valuable presentation of such irrefutable evidence. We should all be profoundly grateful and appreciative. to be in the presence of an intelligent fellow such as yourself !
Al cabo de 53 años vuelven con la misma parafernalia,"especie de lata de sardinas", los selenitas se deben partir de risa , ante semejante demostracion tecnologica.
Bueno, ahora, filmaran con iphones.
Seu comentário não faz o menor sentido
PEACE
LOVE
CALM
UNITY
HONESTY
PROSPERITY
FREE THINKING
GOOD HEALTH
RESPECT
KINDNESS
HAPPINESS
WISDOM
SOBRIETY
OPTIMISM
artemis flew over apollo landing sites yet STILL no evidence of flag :/
Noice 👍
Fotoshop ou CGI kkkkkkkk
DD Selva is having a DUH moment
Artemis- 1
Moon Hoaxers- 0
Wow, Artemis is doing what man has “apparently already done”…. Pointless $81 billion dollar tab placed on the shoulders of tax payers…. Thanks
So. you're a tax payer ? So am I, and I'm not worried about it.
Prob not just a test.... Could be setting up before humans get there. Dropping pop up buildings and it will set up its self. Government don't tell us everything lol
I feel sad for people like you that can't see that, just because the benefits on earth of a mission like this is not immediately apparent, that the benefits are great. I'd rather have this small portion of our tax money spent than the amount we spent in endless wars.
@@Kyle7K Well said Kyle.
@@Kyle7K that’s wishful thinking and wishful thinking of trading war funds for space funds does not draw attention to the facts. We are paying for both and it does not benefit us at all. 🤣 well said chad… I mean Kyle 🤣🤣🤣🤣
😂🤣
Lost contact....how convenient!
Interesting that this spacecraft has taken pictures of the far side of the moon where the alleged Apollo landing sites are stated to be located....INTERESTING ABSOLUTELY NO EVIDENCE OF THE ALEDGED APOLLO LANDING SITES COULD BE FOUND
All the SIX Apollo Landing Sites are located on the near side of the Moon . Learn about things. Do better next time. And what's with the SHOUTING ? Feeling a little insecure in your willful ignorance perhaps ?
Check out the pictures taken by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbitor.
The landing sites are on the near side not the far side. If you're going to spout disprovable idiocy, at least get that part right.
@@kellycochran6487 crazy how I mentioned the far side ONLY BECAUSE NASA SAID THEY FLEW OVER THE APOLLO FICTIONALIZED LANDING SITES ...
YOU SEE, the story teller (NASA) CANNOT EVEN GET IT RIGHT....CUZ THESE ALEDGED APOLLO LANDING SITES DO NOT EXIST...ABSOLUTELY HILARIOUS.....LMFAO...
@@kellycochran6487 crazy how I mentioned the far side ONLY BECAUSE NASA SAID THEY FLEW OVER THE APOLLO FICTIONALIZED LANDING SITES ...
YOU SEE, the story teller CANNOT EVEN GET IT RIGHT....NOW THAT'S PRETTY BAD.....IT'S ABSOLUTELY HILARIOUS.....LMFAO...
cgi now so good its impossible to recognise real footage
PEACE
LOVE
CALM
UNITY
HONESTY
PROSPERITY
FREE THINKING
GOOD HEALTH
RESPECT
KINDNESS
HAPPINESS
WISDOM
SOBRIETY
OPTIMISM
This Is so fake moon wobbles and moves funny
Flatearther detected.
That's because the cameras are mounted on the Solar Panels which flex a little.
Just cgi
Flatearther detected.
What a landing, no man was on the Moon