💡Here's a challenge: Write a sentence in the niche jargon specific to your interests or field of work, and then write a layman's translation for others to understand!
Sign shop jargon: “I need that in a vectorized format, printed to match Pantone green 3278C, mounted on 1/8” poly”. Explained: “no, I can’t take your bitmap, stamp sized image and blow it up to billboard size without it becoming incredibly pixelated and no, ‘algae green’ is not a standard for a color”. Something like that, ha!
Integration of the brain leads to inner well-being, aliveness, & intimate relationships. Layman's terms: Being aware, accountable, & able to regulate thoughts & emotions consistently for harmony & neutrality to arise in the body, mind, & relationships, in one's interactions & every day.
@aubreyj.tennant1123 I support people with personal development and self-help, and continuously update my education. Throughout the past 2-3 years I have taken courses on trauma and attachment, and continue to do so. These (educational courses - I can share if you want the names of them) have given me the possibility to understand integration of the brain, alongside restorative embodiment, which enables me to talk about it, teach it, integrate it in personal development and self-help content, courses, consulting, ect. I also love to talk about it with anyone who cares about inner well-being & people who are interested in learning more, and with my IHP community on TH-cam, podcast, and TikTok 😊
"never use a complex word when a simple one will do." - orwell as a teacher and counselor, big words have value when no better word exists. When a simpler word does exist, people learn more effectively. No one cares how much you know until they know how much you care, and alienating them through language will not establish that basis you need for support, friendship, or learning.
Alan known for being an actor. Will be known as a lifelong advocate for understanding communication. One of our greatest current failings. Thank you for your efforts!
Alan point on the importance of using plain language is spot on! Building a personal connection and simplifying complex ideas can enhance understanding and communication effectiveness. 🔑
I was reading recently "How to Win Friends and Influence People." It talks about how it's impolite to correct folks unless you really have to. Try to talk to somebody, not over them. It can be the same with jargon.
"People will not know what you truly know if you show off the words you know" - Me If you are conveying a message and use big words. People will end up being aware of the big words, but will not be aware of what you know (i.e. your message)
Perhaps the most important principle of communication - and the toughest lesson for those with a more sophisticated than average practical vocabulary. It's actually quite difficult, and a consummate struggle of attentiveness, to almost _always_ be dumbing down your verbiage to suit the INCREDIBLY poor (basic English) comprehension of the majority of people today. It means taking a single, clearly-conceived, quite reasonably constructed, straightforward and uncomplicated sentence... and dutifully, painstakingly proceeding to instead UNtruncate every last god damn word (that isn't literally in a 1980s kindergartener's vocabulary), unfolding its simple construction into a long paragraph of monosyllabic, spoonfed breast milk. But - such is the cost of business, when communication is not just the business of encoding; but also of decoding. The fact of this matter was first pointed out to a young me by a wonderful writer, C.S. Lewis, who could've dizzied me with his amazing vocabulary, if he wanted to - but instead gracefully and magnanimously demonstrated his great _command_ of the English language, by communicating his concepts with plain, simple verbiage - but very effectively so. He aspired to meet his audience as individuals with whom he was having a one-on-one conversation.
YES, YES, but why can't DEMOCRATS get this, to reach average VOTERS? Will Smith was taken down in moments, after attacking Chris Rock on TV. Yet in 8 years, Democrats have been unable to take down Trumpism... TNX
@@myggggeneration Haha... Why so, though? There are these little semantic differences/nuances which give almost all of our various words their own unique meaning, when we really get specific about their definitions. That's where our word choice is most ideally found, which generally succeeds in subconsciously conveying the gist that we're going for (unless the listener has no comprehension of the term!), including all that subconscious, contextual, and often _deeply_ nuanced stuff. 'Verbage' is what I was going for here - but I'm definitely open to a better suggestion... (?)
@@justinklenk The word is “verbiage” not “verbage”, and both your posts are pretentious, verbose, and grating. *Don’t write overtly to impress* should have been the message you absorbed from this video. You might benefit from (re-)reading *The Elements of Style*.
It's called argument by gibberish, Jordan Peterson is great at it. If you say enough fancy words which are misunderstood by most, then you win the argument!
Unfortunately, many people who are listening to Peterson and those like him are vulnerable. They may not even be aware that they are. Many are lost (probably also lonely) and looking for answers. They're easily manipulated with rhetoric.
One of the first things you read in a philosophy book on writing. Don't use pretentious language to cover up a bad argument. And I'm just doing it as a hobby. Peterson gets a lot of people to think he is smarter than he is though.
It's true. Every year or so I give a Peterson another chance by sitting back and listening to him speak in longer form, like a lecture or podcast with one of his peers. And everytime I'm disappointed. He sounds like a parody of himself and I can't figure out why people find him valuable to the degree they do. He ultimately offers so little. Especially compared to his peers. His feels like a clown version of a modern philosopher/researcher.
Some people just don't want to be understood.They want to display themselves as super cute. In Germany it is almost done by words borrowed from foreign languages. In the past it was Latin, then French and now English. Almost for each of these words and expressions there are analogs in German and mostly they sound much better in German spoken speach. Nevertheless the English phrases are used even if one can assume that the counterpart won't understand each nuance. But the speaker can show his superiority. With German expressions it would be possible to explain the details of what one wants to communicate. Sometimes by the use of foreign words it is also hidden that the speaker has not much to say.
Agreed. Philosophers tend to do this. Their books are full of technical concepts that make those books really hard to read. In the end, most of it is just charlatanism.
Regarding the charlatanism charge, that’s true of Continental (pseudo-) philosophy. It’s not true of analytic philosophy, which, done right, is the cure.
@bhz8947 Aaah...!!! The eternal debate between continental and analytic philosophy. I think that both are right, but there are some individuals that mess up everything. What I want to say is that, when I read Heidegger and Sartre, I understand what they say (I may not agree with them), but it takes me a lot of time to digest what they mean, do to their way of describing things and the big words that they use (I have to look those words in the dictionary, constantly and even check the etymology). In the end, I finished reading 700 pages of pure verbosity that doesn't make me more intelligent at all but leaves me with a big dissatisfaction and a sensation of having wasted my time. All with the intention of looking more "intelligent", which, sincerely, I think is pure stupidity and even morally reprehensible.
I had to take a PR class for my environmental post grad to learn how to explain climate change to none scientists. Language really does matter in how you get people to understand complex subjects like climate change. Its not dumbing it down. Its just another way to explain it so more people can understand it. Even hobbies have their nomenclature. Someone who don't cook would never understand what 'low and slow' means.
@@Vanity0666 so you know what I mean by saying I cooked a rack of ribs low and slow. My mother certainly wouldn't but she can't cook very well. That's jargon for something specific that only those who have information knows what it means.
💡Here's a challenge: Write a sentence in the niche jargon specific to your interests or field of work, and then write a layman's translation for others to understand!
Sign shop jargon: “I need that in a vectorized format, printed to match Pantone green 3278C, mounted on 1/8” poly”.
Explained: “no, I can’t take your bitmap, stamp sized image and blow it up to billboard size without it becoming incredibly pixelated and no, ‘algae green’ is not a standard for a color”.
Something like that, ha!
Integration of the brain leads to inner well-being, aliveness, & intimate relationships. Layman's terms: Being aware, accountable, & able to regulate thoughts & emotions consistently for harmony & neutrality to arise in the body, mind, & relationships, in one's interactions & every day.
Good advice. Thank you 🙏🏻
@@inspiringhumanpotentialabsolutely! I’m curious how you know this? I’d like to learn more. 👍😊
@aubreyj.tennant1123 I support people with personal development and self-help, and continuously update my education. Throughout the past 2-3 years I have taken courses on trauma and attachment, and continue to do so. These (educational courses - I can share if you want the names of them) have given me the possibility to understand integration of the brain, alongside restorative embodiment, which enables me to talk about it, teach it, integrate it in personal development and self-help content, courses, consulting, ect. I also love to talk about it with anyone who cares about inner well-being & people who are interested in learning more, and with my IHP community on TH-cam, podcast, and TikTok 😊
"never use a complex word when a simple one will do." - orwell
as a teacher and counselor, big words have value when no better word exists. When a simpler word does exist, people learn more effectively. No one cares how much you know until they know how much you care, and alienating them through language will not establish that basis you need for support, friendship, or learning.
I love your comment. I feel the exact same way and could not have put it better. Love from Germany
@@antoniovinciguerra8982aw, thanks for considering my thoughts.
Wasn’t that George orwell
@@josh4144omg you're right. fixed it. sorry im old it all blura
Alan known for being an actor. Will be known as a lifelong advocate for understanding communication. One of our greatest current failings. Thank you for your efforts!
Alan Alda, you are such a good human. ❤
He's one of our favorites!
Thank you Alan.
Alan point on the importance of using plain language is spot on! Building a personal connection and simplifying complex ideas can enhance understanding and communication effectiveness. 🔑
It is one of those GOLDEN timeless messages. Thank you Alan Alda. 💛
Thank you for watching, Ruth!
🙂
Good to see Alan Alda again.
always.
Always great when Alan Alda makes an appearance
I was reading recently "How to Win Friends and Influence People." It talks about how it's impolite to correct folks unless you really have to. Try to talk to somebody, not over them. It can be the same with jargon.
This is beautiful advice, thank you for sharing!
Alan, I grew up with M*A*S*H in the 90s here in Germany and you was my role-model - now I know why.
If you should read this: Thank you.
Profound. Thank you Alan.
Thanks for watching! We're glad you're here.
Alan Alda! I have loved you since the 70s. Great touching story that moved be but also in all made me smile. Thank you.
We need more Alan! I always love what he shares!
This was amazing. So useful. Alan Alda is a National Treasure.
Thanks for the info Alan.
Technical jargon is precisely what keeps people in the dark about the corruption that is the financial sector.
It is hid and seek in the business world sort of Ponzi scheme.
Alan Alda is such a sincere speaker...I always stop to listen to what he has to say
He's so captivating, truly!
"People will not know what you truly know if you show off the words you know" - Me
If you are conveying a message and use big words. People will end up being aware of the big words, but will not be aware of what you know (i.e. your message)
Executives use this style of speech to confuse and intimidate investors, employees, media into not asking questions.
Corporations are private dictatorships
Needed this so much
We're glad it found you!
This is such a fantastic discussion, thanks so much for posting!
Thanks for watching! We're so happy you're here!
@@The-Well For reasons completely unrelated to this video, it's really nice to have someone say this right now. Thanks for your kind words.
Thank you for sharing this knowledge.
And thank you for watching! You are appreciated!
Very nice video!
Thanks for the visit! We appreciate you!
Perhaps the most important principle of communication - and the toughest lesson for those with a more sophisticated than average practical vocabulary. It's actually quite difficult, and a consummate struggle of attentiveness, to almost _always_ be dumbing down your verbiage to suit the INCREDIBLY poor (basic English) comprehension of the majority of people today. It means taking a single, clearly-conceived, quite reasonably constructed, straightforward and uncomplicated sentence... and dutifully, painstakingly proceeding to instead UNtruncate every last god damn word (that isn't literally in a 1980s kindergartener's vocabulary), unfolding its simple construction into a long paragraph of monosyllabic, spoonfed breast milk. But - such is the cost of business, when communication is not just the business of encoding; but also of decoding.
The fact of this matter was first pointed out to a young me by a wonderful writer, C.S. Lewis, who could've dizzied me with his amazing vocabulary, if he wanted to - but instead gracefully and magnanimously demonstrated his great _command_ of the English language, by communicating his concepts with plain, simple verbiage - but very effectively so. He aspired to meet his audience as individuals with whom he was having a one-on-one conversation.
YES, YES, but why can't DEMOCRATS get this, to reach average VOTERS?
Will Smith was taken down in moments, after attacking Chris Rock on TV.
Yet in 8 years, Democrats have been unable to take down Trumpism... TNX
I ascertain that you know what you are talking about 😉
"verbage" what an ugly word amongst all your pretty words..... JMO
@@myggggeneration
Haha... Why so, though? There are these little semantic differences/nuances which give almost all of our various words their own unique meaning, when we really get specific about their definitions. That's where our word choice is most ideally found, which generally succeeds in subconsciously conveying the gist that we're going for (unless the listener has no comprehension of the term!), including all that subconscious, contextual, and often _deeply_ nuanced stuff. 'Verbage' is what I was going for here - but I'm definitely open to a better suggestion... (?)
@@justinklenk The word is “verbiage” not “verbage”, and both your posts are pretentious, verbose, and grating. *Don’t write overtly to impress* should have been the message you absorbed from this video. You might benefit from (re-)reading *The Elements of Style*.
It's called argument by gibberish, Jordan Peterson is great at it. If you say enough fancy words which are misunderstood by most, then you win the argument!
Actually, you (Peterson) only think you won . And only you (Peterson) think that. Every other intelligent observer sees right through the BS.
I think most people see through the BS, which makes it more frustrating when others dont. because they vote
Unfortunately, many people who are listening to Peterson and those like him are vulnerable. They may not even be aware that they are.
Many are lost (probably also lonely) and looking for answers. They're easily manipulated with rhetoric.
One of the first things you read in a philosophy book on writing. Don't use pretentious language to cover up a bad argument.
And I'm just doing it as a hobby. Peterson gets a lot of people to think he is smarter than he is though.
It's true. Every year or so I give a Peterson another chance by sitting back and listening to him speak in longer form, like a lecture or podcast with one of his peers. And everytime I'm disappointed. He sounds like a parody of himself and I can't figure out why people find him valuable to the degree they do. He ultimately offers so little. Especially compared to his peers. His feels like a clown version of a modern philosopher/researcher.
Well said Alan!! However, with swell robotics everywhere, Ai jobloss is the only thing I worry about anymore.
Some people just don't want to be understood.They want to display themselves as super cute. In Germany it is almost done by words borrowed from foreign languages. In the past it was Latin, then French and now English. Almost for each of these words and expressions there are analogs in German and mostly they sound much better in German spoken speach. Nevertheless the English phrases are used even if one can assume that the counterpart won't understand each nuance. But the speaker can show his superiority. With German expressions it would be possible to explain the details of what one wants to communicate. Sometimes by the use of foreign words it is also hidden that the speaker has not much to say.
Damn, that cancer story breaks my heart though 💔
I like "the martini shot". I'm going to use that.
So when I start by saying: 'How can I put this simply ...' I am saying: 'I have to tune down, so you can get me?'😅
Yes, not Dumb Down! Which sounds condescending. IMO.
Neural chunking in your brain helps you to remember patterns of analysis so it takes less effort
Outsiders using my field’s jargon piss me off. 😂
Top notch, Well!! ❤
Empathy can be taught
Agreed. Philosophers tend to do this. Their books are full of technical concepts that make those books really hard to read. In the end, most of it is just charlatanism.
Regarding the charlatanism charge, that’s true of Continental (pseudo-) philosophy. It’s not true of analytic philosophy, which, done right, is the cure.
@bhz8947 Aaah...!!! The eternal debate between continental and analytic philosophy. I think that both are right, but there are some individuals that mess up everything.
What I want to say is that, when I read Heidegger and Sartre, I understand what they say (I may not agree with them), but it takes me a lot of time to digest what they mean, do to their way of describing things and the big words that they use (I have to look those words in the dictionary, constantly and even check the etymology). In the end, I finished reading 700 pages of pure verbosity that doesn't make me more intelligent at all but leaves me with a big dissatisfaction and a sensation of having wasted my time.
All with the intention of looking more "intelligent", which, sincerely, I think is pure stupidity and even morally reprehensible.
Do you ever attempt to use a glossary or dictionary
@@Vanity0666 Of course. I certainly do it.
God bless you Hawkeye
I had to take a PR class for my environmental post grad to learn how to explain climate change to none scientists. Language really does matter in how you get people to understand complex subjects like climate change. Its not dumbing it down. Its just another way to explain it so more people can understand it. Even hobbies have their nomenclature. Someone who don't cook would never understand what 'low and slow' means.
Low and slow isnt jargon it's a literal 1:1 instruction
@@Vanity0666 so you know what I mean by saying I cooked a rack of ribs low and slow. My mother certainly wouldn't but she can't cook very well. That's jargon for something specific that only those who have information knows what it means.
Hawkeye!!
❤
Wait isnt this the guy who tried to kill raymond reddington?
Other peoples stupidity is not my problem or concern.
If and when you are called to be a legal witness, will you be hostile?
Wow. th-cam.com/video/Q_28JhjoLnI/w-d-xo.html Such a powerful story.
We're so glad you enjoyed. Thanks for watching!
Can’t stand those snobs