Yeah, it’s starting to get harder to tell. But there’s ways around that; digital watermarks for all real images? Of course there’ll be an arms race as AI generated watermarks will be made…
@@alst4817 The idea of 'watermarks' on any class of media (real only, fake only, etc) is a complete joke. Even if some obese cucks in the EU parliament passed a law saying that AI-generated images need to have digital watermarks, that would only apply to a handful of law-abiding users/companies in their jurisdiction. 99% of the world wouldn't follow that law, and you'd need absolute, 100% adherence for it to even kind of matter. I've read every whitepaper that's been proofed on this this topic, and they all say, 'Assuming everyone follows the same law, 100% of the time, then we can ... '
"Maybe if you upgraded from that yee-yee ass gpu, then maybe you'll generate some nice bitches on your disk Or better yet, maybe Tanisha will call your dog ass when she stops chatting with that GPT or chatbot she chattin with"
Thanks god we are replacing some of the most creative and accessible jobs in the world! I lost the plot when we started to improve ai. Like for who is it made again? Trolls, scammers,hustlers and greedy corporations. Wow what a fantastic world we live in!
Yeah! It's not like what the majority of people wanted for hundreds of years is automation of terrible, terrible manual labour jobs that keep you away from self-fulfillment and leave your health irreversibly shattered in ten years or less! What we really need to do is replace artists (whom anyone can already feasibly become with enough determination and free time!) in exchange for awful, soulless, corporate c o n t e n t in place of art, with no vision nor value, produced and not created!! Art is the r e a l menace to society and the working class!!!
"Oh boohoo I thought AI would only destroy the proles' jobs not mine, woe is meeee 😢😢" RIP bozo, you aren't needed anymore, just like we don't need scribing monks, horse carriage drivers, or laundry ladies.
@@CatroiOz I undestand that you really enjoy your low wage job where you dont need any education or skills but let other people enjoy making art.(and "scribing monks" are you 12 lmao, thats the most reaching example you could of ever given)
@@Prosto-Ban I'm sorry mate but I won't take you seriously when you accuse me of being 12 and then write "could of" 🤣. I'm sure the world is losing one of the greatest artist of all time now that your job is taken by AI though
@@CatroiOz. Whatever you do in life is surely not a boring job that you hate. Surellllyyyyy… (also English is my fourth language so I kinda don’t care about your grammar “gotcha” moment)
Revelation 3:20 Behold, I stand at the door, and knock: if any man hear my voice, and open the door, I will come in to him, and will sup with him, and he with me. HEY THERE 🤗 JESUS IS CALLING YOU TODAY. Turn away from your sins, confess, forsake them and live the victorious life. God bless. Revelation 22:12-14 And, behold, I come quickly; and my reward is with me, to give every man according as his work shall be. I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the end, the first and the last. Blessed are they that do his commandments, that they may have right to the tree of life, and may enter in through the gates into the city.
Yeah, certainly makes me think about mine. I think I did before, too, but now I actually remember doing it, for days afterwards, every time I see it in one of Jeff's vids. It's a grand fucking shame medical research and trials only ever get VC hype money when there's scammery afoot.
More depth of field != better, god damnit. All the bigger, newer image generators are so biased towards that. I guess it's an easy cheat: harder for the AI to mistakenly blend background and foreground elements if the background is just indecipherably blurred.
That's how your eyeballs work. But you're correct. There is a divide. Some people like pristine clarity and unreal sharpness in there pictures. And some persons like the visuals of your actual eyeball depth of field. Its one of the first things a photographer has to present in their portfolio. I used to edit photos for wedding photographers. Women like "see everything in the pictures infinite focal length" more than "depth of field bokeh."
@complexity5545 Maybe if I was like 2mm away from the person in question lmao. Also my actual eyeballs dynamically adjust to put everything in focus when I look at it. Even in games this isn't terrible since you can look around but in static images it just sucks so much.
Sorry for being pedantic but you mean "shallower/narrower depth of field". If it was a larger/wider depth of field, it'd have more of the image in focus.
@ShawnFumo personally I hate shallow DOF in photos. I like my photos to carry more information than what my eyes can see. But that's just a personal opinion. I'm fine with it in movies because there, focus can serve a narrative purpose.
@@NesiAwesomeness Colossians 3. 1. If ye then be risen with Christ, seek those things which are above where Christ sitteth on the right hand of God. 2. Set your affection on the things which are above and not on things which are on the earth. 3. For ye are dead and your life is hid with Christ in God. 4. When Christ, which is our life shall appear, so shall ye also appear with him in Glory. ******** Jesus is calling you today. Come to him, repent from your sins, bear his cross and live the victorious life ********
As far as I understand, Flux Dev CAN be used commercially, or at least the images generated from the model can be. The part that's non commercial is the model itself, like you can't sell your own image generator service using the model.
@@kitkatkk2 that's not true, i'm an European dev, when you accept the conditions of use, you actually sign a contract. So if the contract say you can't sell an image the generator created, then you really can't do it or you accept the legal issues. To make things clear, you can even pattern code meaning the way of writing some code can put you into debt or prison.
it's says in T&C's what you are mentioning: 2. d. Outputs. We claim no ownership rights in and to the Outputs. You are solely responsible for the Outputs you generate and their subsequent uses in accordance with this License. You may use Output for any purpose (including for commercial purposes), except as expressly prohibited herein. You may not use the Output to train, fine-tune or distill a model that is competitive with the FLUX.1 [dev] Model. When they say no commercial use, this is for the model itself and it's derivatives ... happy prompting
It's really sad how many people out here don't realize the terrible future we're putting ourselves on by being accepting of these "tools". Just because the tech has been made, doesn't mean we can't stigmatize it and thus make it socially unacceptable to participate in and produce with this kind of crap. We're going to suck all the life out of our future if people keep being complacent with this, or even promoting it like you're doing.
@@NoahWei42 yeah that's the important thing, it is valid to point out downsides to generative AI concerning knowledge and evidence, but not using it yourself doesn't make it go away
@@rorgorr2339 it is kind of funny that artists are so mad that other people can finally get their mental pictures out as well. Sourcing issues are a very weak and temporary leg to stand on. First, it pretends that human artists dont get inspired by others art they've seen and second the more AI is fed with the less it is inspired by any one source, making it more efficient than humans in not infringing copyright in the long run.
10 years ago: "Self driving cars are the future." Today: Overpriced taxis in 2 cities that are more expensive and generally worse in every way than just getting an Uber. 5 years ago: "VR is the future." Today: It completely flopped, even Apple couldn't make a convincing product around it. Today: "Generative AI is the future". In 5 years: I have a pretty good guess. The industry lost its touch.
Nothing about cars are the future, trains are the future. Generative AI is not just the future but the present. As you'd know if you'd tried using ChatGPT for writing or programming.
I'm not sure if I agree with that analogy. The technology for reliable self-driving cars 10 years ago was too far off to predict whether it would become reality in just 10 years, its looking like 20 or more. We definitely don't have anywhere near the technology for true VR as it was envisioned since decades ago, that's like 40-50 years more at least. We have pre-sentient generative AI tools now and graphic designers who went to college for their degree are being trained on then laid off to save money. Generative AI is already affecting peoples' lives and it actually is a bit terrifying to think how things will be 5 years from now.
wtf are you on generative AI is guaranteed to be the future because it's already the present. ChatGPT for software development, stable diffusion for art. You are ignorant.
@@savagej4y241 lol useless degrees get irrelevant, checks out Suddenly all the platitudes about expression and soul of art disappear when everyone else prefers AI to get the job done and you need to get a day job.
@@yadusolparterre Because he is processing with everything he got against OpenAI, as he considers himself a philanthropistic hero and wants OpenAI to re-open again and not totally because he is a jealous narcissist who wants personal gains.
@@RamirezGold Revelation 3:20 Behold, I stand at the door, and knock: if any man hear my voice, and open the door, I will come in to him, and will sup with him, and he with me. HEY THERE 🤗 JESUS IS CALLING YOU TODAY. Turn away from your sins, confess, forsake them and live the victorious life. God bless. Revelation 22:12-14 And, behold, I come quickly; and my reward is with me, to give every man according as his work shall be. I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the end, the first and the last. Blessed are they that do his commandments, that they may have right to the tree of life, and may enter in through the gates into the city.
Tahnk you, you are the first big creator to get it right and mention that Grok's image generation is actually Flux.1 by some of the devs that came from Stability AI.
Let's make only fans for ai! 1. Allow users to create girlfriends, provide fine tuning for images, texts and all 2. Allow them to sell those girlfriends and milk the suckers 3. Take a cut from that. Pretty simple, viable business model.
A young AI researcher in Sweden was on TV demanding regulations against open source. The main risk of AI is not open source. It's centralization and regulatory capture.
Astounding to see the pace of AI evolution, and how Flux from Black Forest Labs is leading the way. One key point for me is the potential misuse of impersonation, which companies and regulatory bodies will need to address in the future. Will be interesting to see where the advancements lead us and how they shape our view of reality.
I do think we're going to be in for a hard time with stuff like this. Definitely not a bad idea to set up a code word with family in case someone spoofs a voice, etc. The most fundamental problem though is that it feels almost impossible to actually control all of this. I think people are under the impression that the only way to train and run these things are with oodles of money and compute, but that is changing quite fast. Like a recent research paper showed how to train an image model from scratch (not at the level of Flux but better than Stable Diffusion 1.5/2) for less than $2,000, with 37m images (SD 1.5 cost $300k and used 4b training images). And even though SD took a lot to train, the result is a 2GB file that you can run locally offline on an iPhone. And those can already easily be modified to impersonate various people, change (inpaint) existing images, etc. And that's all with the current hardware and current techniques. In a year or two, maybe it costs $200 to train a Flux-quality model and maybe you can run that on a new generation phone. Obviously video generation is a lot more intensive, but what is cutting edge now will be easier in a few years as well. Once the techniques are known publicly, it feels like it is pretty hard to actually regulate this stuff. Sure, we can clamp down on the big companies like OpenAI and Google and Grok that make it super easy for anyone to do online, but that doesn't really stop the fact that anyone can download an open weights model from online and use it however they want.
Things change so quickly in this space - it is incredible. This makes me feel like I don't want to invest my time in learning a new model, because literally every month there is a new model that surpasses the old one.
I'm sure the careless spending will dry up eventually, where anyone with "ai" in the product description gets thrown a ton of money. I don't think the tech itself is going away any time soon though.
you have the "commercially" part wrong. you can use the outputs commercially, just not for instance training a new model in order to sell that model. talked to some of the devs on Discord and they confirmed this part, it's also explicitly stated in the terms that you can use the outputs commercially.
0:54 It's on August 19, 2024 or Safar 14, 1446 AH and you're watching Fireship Videos about New Open-Source AI Model called Flux.1 on the Code Report Series.
Truly open, free, accessible AI is the greatest indicator on who are the bootlickers for less free speech, less broken copyright, and more government overreach on expression. AI should never be reserved for the top 0.01% of our societies.
You missed the point of the people who want restrictions for generative AI spectacularly. Or you intentionally and maliciously misrepresent their position.
@Xirtamani The government can sneak whatever they want into "restrictions" though. Including policies restricting user freedom. It's been done countless times. The internet and free market does best without government interference.
@@juangalton999 No, they can't. Because it's public. At least in proper democracies. Free market does best without government interference, eh? You might wanna polish up your history knowledge in that area. Like, food safety and monopolies. To name two of the bigger examples.
It's too late, the cat is out of the bag and legislating open source AI out of existence will only make it worse as it will allow close source ones and their owners and backers to just do whatever they want while the rest of population it's in the dark.
I actually used Flux.1(Schnell) last week and made an Ai-image-generator project, some high quality images being generated from this model, and it is quite insane how we had LLAMA 3.1 last month and so fast things changed since. It is really hard to keep up with all the developments.
I don't know if this thing justifies its existence anymore, coworker uses it and the computing power it takes to have just slightly more control with the prompt is insane. but other than very specific cases it did generate dogshit so.. do we need to spend that much money and time on maintaining tools that can only solve 1% of the problems?
@@solarydays I believe this is just the start of Gen AI, last year there was no any RAG but it has become powerful, there's always the hallucination and Catastrophic forgetting problems within the LLMs, but sooner or later it will be tuned. Also Devin a concept will be implemented and that would the real end times for many, if you think right now it is solving 1% then it might directly jump to 15%. The precision will be improved.
These image generators like Flux are revolutionising the field. However, the potential for misuse does raise ethical concerns. It's a fine balance between innovation and protecting public interest.
Video is the last big thing. As soon as these video models get really good and open source every piece of media on the internet will degenerate into spam. At that point people will just stop using the internet.
2:53 You can, in fact, use anything (image, sound, text, etc.) produced with ai for commercial purposes. There is no legal protection of ai generated content. Terms of service agreements can say whatever they want, it means nothing if they can't enforce it
Just a note for the comment at 1:01 - GROK is not Flux 1. GROK is a Chatbot / Personal Assistant FLUX1 is an AI Model focused specifically on Image Generation Although GROK uses FLUX1 for image generation, it is not the same as Flux 1 - by far.
Sometimes I get sad thinking about all the cool things I could do if I knew how to code but then I remember that I'd still be too lazy to do any of them anyway
In my country a scandal blew up last week when it was discovered that in a private school, some students created using AI cp images of other students and sold it online. Currently there is no legislation in my country for images of you made with AI. I believe giving access to AI to the general public was a mistake.
Unfortunately this kind of gross abuse is something I constantly worry about with AI, and it's only going to become more normalized like any unethical behavior culture is steeped in for long enough to become calloused towards it.
1:24 It looks really good and generates mostly correctly, but still gets the number of legs wrong most of the time. Spiders are notoriously hard to generate while animals with 4 legs are easier to render correctly.
Bro the way you show case the tech make's use to view the world in more COOL way. I hope I can learn or work and learn or gain more experience from you 🥺. Wishing to connect soon👍.
Still want to hear these defeatist predictions about AI? It's been the same for 2 years and the only thing that's changed so far is that LLMs have become paid (and stupider) XD
@@Hhhh22222-w Huh? Examples? Isn't most technology available to the masses specifically because people can make money out of it? Why do you think they were making jet airliners, smart phones, solar panels, etc?
The thing about Flux that is so insane is how accurate the depictions of your prompt are to the resulting image. You could describe to it a dream that you had in great detail using complete sentences, and it will spit out pretty much exactly what you described.
These AI products induce my deepest boomer response to anything happening in the world right now by far. What is the point of this technology? What problems do video and image generators solve? Seriously. These sorts of models are billion dollar meme generators *at best*. Even the more "responsible" models with guard rails intended to protect individuals don't solve a single, real problem. It seems like nobody pushing generative AI can come up with a valid use case for any of it, just look at the latest ads for Gemini: "Generate an image of a cat. Woah! Now generate an image of another cat. Woah! Isn't this wacky fun?" It's completely insane.
It's a good question. Ever since I've started seeing AI generation of text and images, I've been thinking about mimicry in nature. What are the motivations for mimicking another animal? The answers are often not good for the animal being mimicked.
AI image generation and LLMs are a primer for what is to come. Slowly introducing 'artificial' interaction so that when robotics enter the main stream in full force humans will already be fully ready to accept them as 'normal'.
Note that I'm pretty sure Civitai has generation and training this model [Edit] I Just checked, if you want to use the Standard model, you can basically only do 4 a day Pro model is 4 every 2 days Obviously you could just use the 'draft' setting which cuts that drastically at the cost of it looking like ass. Draft gives you around 24 per day
Flux is what SD3 was supposed to be, and failed miserably! Although Flux is fantastic, it certainly needs a better config if you want to run it locally, even my 3060 knows to struggle. Thankfully the community is finding it's ways! Just days after flux releasing, on day 1 i had constant crashes and my PC was going NUTS trying to generate images through ComfyUI. Then i switched to Forge and it made a HUGE difference! No more crashes, and only a few stutters while i still get the same quality, and better (maybe my comfyui was bugged or somth) resolution pictures. I hope LORA training will be possible on 12 GB VRAM, kohya did begin training but after some tries and long hours it never gave me good pictures, just blurred to hell pictures.
The governments are doing the exact same thing. If they have their way soon only big tech companies and their CEOs and politicians will be able to use AI or at least a version that is not completely censored up the wazoo.
nah the internet is starting to die, soon all the forums will be flooded to bots indistinguishable from real people and that will basically kill the point of the internet
@@users4007 The death of the internet could be the start of a new era. The generative AI era. When we stop searching and we start GeNeRaTiNg. I think it's progress.
I like how for every pro of AI there are 10 serious cons, I get to generate funny memes while simultaneously having to keep pictures of my kids off the internet to stop pedophiles from creating ai child porn😁 yay progress!!!!
@@humanbeans4498 I dont actually have kids its just a point, but as to yours... I dont know how to tell you this but almost every single person I know posts pictures of their kids... Im astonished you think thats abnormal.
I mean the license dont prohibit you to use their model to generate image. All generated image are not copyrighted I believe. It is just you cant use the model as a web service to profit.
Kind of rich coming from Google about ways Generative AI can be used as a manipulation tool, as it actively works on developing / pushing it to the masses.
In my lifetime it went from "pics or it didn't happen" to " I didn't see it, it didn't happen".
Yeah, it’s starting to get harder to tell. But there’s ways around that; digital watermarks for all real images? Of course there’ll be an arms race as AI generated watermarks will be made…
Actually thats just it coming full circle. Thats how it was, and now thats how it is
In your lifetime? More like, 'In five years it went from ... '
@@alst4817 The idea of 'watermarks' on any class of media (real only, fake only, etc) is a complete joke. Even if some obese cucks in the EU parliament passed a law saying that AI-generated images need to have digital watermarks, that would only apply to a handful of law-abiding users/companies in their jurisdiction. 99% of the world wouldn't follow that law, and you'd need absolute, 100% adherence for it to even kind of matter. I've read every whitepaper that's been proofed on this this topic, and they all say, 'Assuming everyone follows the same law, 100% of the time, then we can ... '
Thomas the Apostle was right all along
4:14 The scariest thing in this video was that .jpg.png extension I saw... Absolutely heinous!
Why?
@@AlexV6 .jpg and .png are two different formats, you can't have .jpg.png lol
hey at least its .png
'Tis but a png trying to conceal its nature and impersonate a jpg! Don't be fooled by its witchcraft! 🙉
@@oh-noe you can on at least linux, image.jpg converted to image.jpg.png is a png extension image where .jpg just became part of the file name.
Another week, another ai model
JavaScript libraries finally have a promising opponent 😂
AI models dropping faster than Javascript frameworks now
Yeah, they are worthless already, is someone paying for them at all?
let's keep this like count at 666
Javascript would be proud
Crazy how generating Nazis became a benchmark 🤣
Original guys were diverse too 😂 Iraq, Japan, Thailand, Bulgaria, Romania, Spain
The west is obsessed with Nazis so it's not surprising
@kv4648 don’t forget Bandera’s men in Ukraine and the Palestinians!
TH-cam silently removed my response to this comment 🤣🤣
When life gives you lemons, you generate pictures of Nazis on Google
Fireship is suspiciously happy... were you evading taxes again?
lol
@@ultimaxkom8728lol (start a chain)
He changed the prompt for the Ai voice
He's perfected the art of tax evasion from turnip boy.
"Don't hate me because I'm artificial" had me dead 😂
i thought she was gonna start the Lamar speech for a sec
Maybe if you got rid of those yee yee ass organic body....
"Maybe if you upgraded from that yee-yee ass gpu, then maybe you'll generate some nice bitches on your disk
Or better yet, maybe Tanisha will call your dog ass when she stops chatting with that GPT or chatbot she chattin with"
the face being mainly motionless, gives it the GI Joe PSA feel
"mimimimimimmeh"
schnell means fast in german, and the black forest is a place in germany
Vader means father in German, but Pie Town is a place in NM
I like the ham that comes from there
@@gus473You mean “Vater”, maybe it derived from it.
@@gus473 vader is dutch
Cake
Thanks god we are replacing some of the most creative and accessible jobs in the world! I lost the plot when we started to improve ai. Like for who is it made again? Trolls, scammers,hustlers and greedy corporations. Wow what a fantastic world we live in!
Yeah! It's not like what the majority of people wanted for hundreds of years is automation of terrible, terrible manual labour jobs that keep you away from self-fulfillment and leave your health irreversibly shattered in ten years or less! What we really need to do is replace artists (whom anyone can already feasibly become with enough determination and free time!) in exchange for awful, soulless, corporate c o n t e n t in place of art, with no vision nor value, produced and not created!! Art is the r e a l menace to society and the working class!!!
"Oh boohoo I thought AI would only destroy the proles' jobs not mine, woe is meeee 😢😢"
RIP bozo, you aren't needed anymore, just like we don't need scribing monks, horse carriage drivers, or laundry ladies.
@@CatroiOz I undestand that you really enjoy your low wage job where you dont need any education or skills but let other people enjoy making art.(and "scribing monks" are you 12 lmao, thats the most reaching example you could of ever given)
@@Prosto-Ban I'm sorry mate but I won't take you seriously when you accuse me of being 12 and then write "could of" 🤣.
I'm sure the world is losing one of the greatest artist of all time now that your job is taken by AI though
@@CatroiOz. Whatever you do in life is surely not a boring job that you hate. Surellllyyyyy… (also English is my fourth language so I kinda don’t care about your grammar “gotcha” moment)
This one is wild 💀💀💀 1:02
Revelation 3:20
Behold, I stand at the door, and knock: if any man hear my voice, and open the door, I will come in to him, and will sup with him, and he with me.
HEY THERE 🤗 JESUS IS CALLING YOU TODAY. Turn away from your sins, confess, forsake them and live the victorious life. God bless.
Revelation 22:12-14
And, behold, I come quickly; and my reward is with me, to give every man according as his work shall be.
I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the end, the first and the last.
Blessed are they that do his commandments, that they may have right to the tree of life, and may enter in through the gates into the city.
The "MADE WITH GROK" on it is 💀
Shits so cursed the bot started quoting bible verses
@@unoriginalname3442 nah, it's pretty wholesome
Made in Schwarzwald 😊
2:54 Always wear a sweater with absolute nonsense letters and numbers on it for plausible deniability. „That photo of me? Obv an AI fake!“
or you just live in china (many people wear such things)
Or have sixth fake finger
aitutorialmaker AI fixes this. Dangerous new open-source AI model.
We are watching the end of the Internet one Frieship video at a time
3:21 the hi mom now hits different
Yeah, certainly makes me think about mine. I think I did before, too, but now I actually remember doing it, for days afterwards, every time I see it in one of Jeff's vids. It's a grand fucking shame medical research and trials only ever get VC hype money when there's scammery afoot.
its actually a hint for his real mom, check his old community
More depth of field != better, god damnit. All the bigger, newer image generators are so biased towards that. I guess it's an easy cheat: harder for the AI to mistakenly blend background and foreground elements if the background is just indecipherably blurred.
That's how your eyeballs work. But you're correct. There is a divide. Some people like pristine clarity and unreal sharpness in there pictures. And some persons like the visuals of your actual eyeball depth of field. Its one of the first things a photographer has to present in their portfolio. I used to edit photos for wedding photographers. Women like "see everything in the pictures infinite focal length" more than "depth of field bokeh."
@complexity5545 Maybe if I was like 2mm away from the person in question lmao. Also my actual eyeballs dynamically adjust to put everything in focus when I look at it. Even in games this isn't terrible since you can look around but in static images it just sucks so much.
Sorry for being pedantic but you mean "shallower/narrower depth of field". If it was a larger/wider depth of field, it'd have more of the image in focus.
@ShawnFumo personally I hate shallow DOF in photos. I like my photos to carry more information than what my eyes can see. But that's just a personal opinion. I'm fine with it in movies because there, focus can serve a narrative purpose.
Definitely 👍🏻
0:11, need to wash my eyes with bleach
Exactly, triggered my trypo 0:04
@@NesiAwesomeness
Colossians 3.
1. If ye then be risen with Christ, seek those things which are above where Christ sitteth on the right hand of God.
2. Set your affection on the things which are above and not on things which are on the earth.
3. For ye are dead and your life is hid with Christ in God.
4. When Christ, which is our life shall appear, so shall ye also appear with him in Glory.
********
Jesus is calling you today. Come to him, repent from your sins, bear his cross and live the victorious life
********
@@NesiAwesomenessExactly
Meh, could just as well be real
r/eyeblech
AI models have become the new Javacript frameworks that keep popping up every week
Just when you've adapted to the prompting style of one model family, a new and shinier one pops up.
Except you only stick to frameworks that companies actually use.
@@andyasbestos ikr, like what the hell man, there's no consistency
Just wait until the AI models start generating JavaScript frameworks.
@@JJGlyph Especially when the AI models then start generating AI models
As far as I understand, Flux Dev CAN be used commercially, or at least the images generated from the model can be. The part that's non commercial is the model itself, like you can't sell your own image generator service using the model.
AI images can’t be copyrighted no matter what, so even if the intent was not being able to use the images, they couldn’t do anything about it
@@kitkatkk2 that's not true, i'm an European dev, when you accept the conditions of use, you actually sign a contract.
So if the contract say you can't sell an image the generator created, then you really can't do it or you accept the legal issues.
To make things clear, you can even pattern code meaning the way of writing some code can put you into debt or prison.
it's says in T&C's what you are mentioning:
2. d. Outputs. We claim no ownership rights in and to the Outputs. You are solely responsible for the Outputs you generate and their subsequent uses in accordance with this License. You may use Output for any purpose (including for commercial purposes), except as expressly prohibited herein. You may not use the Output to train, fine-tune or distill a model that is competitive with the FLUX.1 [dev] Model.
When they say no commercial use, this is for the model itself and it's derivatives ... happy prompting
@@llmpixart True, people would just go to the next best one with less tedious rights management.
It's really sad how many people out here don't realize the terrible future we're putting ourselves on by being accepting of these "tools". Just because the tech has been made, doesn't mean we can't stigmatize it and thus make it socially unacceptable to participate in and produce with this kind of crap.
We're going to suck all the life out of our future if people keep being complacent with this, or even promoting it like you're doing.
Aside from the viability of video as evidence in court, there is no harm done by this, except to the gullible who were already at risk.
awh, you havent figured out we lost already. That's kinda cute.
@@NoahWei42 yeah that's the important thing, it is valid to point out downsides to generative AI concerning knowledge and evidence, but not using it yourself doesn't make it go away
you want to shame people for using an open source ai tool? And then you wonder why we want 'artists' like you replaced? Lol
@@rorgorr2339 it is kind of funny that artists are so mad that other people can finally get their mental pictures out as well.
Sourcing issues are a very weak and temporary leg to stand on. First, it pretends that human artists dont get inspired by others art they've seen and second the more AI is fed with the less it is inspired by any one source, making it more efficient than humans in not infringing copyright in the long run.
My career is already over before it even started 💀
That sucks, I hope your career does better.
Yeah, you're right. Not being able to spell "career" is pretty bad homie but gl on your adventure!
same
thanks god your career is safe :)
@@nyannocent not everyone on the internet has english as their first language, brother
10 years ago: "Self driving cars are the future." Today: Overpriced taxis in 2 cities that are more expensive and generally worse in every way than just getting an Uber.
5 years ago: "VR is the future." Today: It completely flopped, even Apple couldn't make a convincing product around it.
Today: "Generative AI is the future". In 5 years: I have a pretty good guess.
The industry lost its touch.
Alledgly, experts are already saying the AI bubble burst
Nothing about cars are the future, trains are the future.
Generative AI is not just the future but the present. As you'd know if you'd tried using ChatGPT for writing or programming.
I'm not sure if I agree with that analogy. The technology for reliable self-driving cars 10 years ago was too far off to predict whether it would become reality in just 10 years, its looking like 20 or more. We definitely don't have anywhere near the technology for true VR as it was envisioned since decades ago, that's like 40-50 years more at least. We have pre-sentient generative AI tools now and graphic designers who went to college for their degree are being trained on then laid off to save money. Generative AI is already affecting peoples' lives and it actually is a bit terrifying to think how things will be 5 years from now.
wtf are you on generative AI is guaranteed to be the future because it's already the present.
ChatGPT for software development, stable diffusion for art. You are ignorant.
@@savagej4y241 lol useless degrees get irrelevant, checks out
Suddenly all the platitudes about expression and soul of art disappear when everyone else prefers AI to get the job done and you need to get a day job.
This man turned a joke into a series with hope, despair, loss and hype. He deserves every bit of recognition he has and even beyond that
(SERIES THAT NO ONE TALKS ABOUT ANYMORE) REFERENCE??????!!!!!!!
Everyone is looking to level up the AI girlfriends.
4:14 I haven't seen that photo in 20 years!
Fr lol
This photo came to my mind recently. I searched for it on Google with some keywords but couldn't find it. Then I saw it here right in front of me.
this is the first time i've seen it and I want to unsee it!!
@Sick_Pencil how can I find that
Nobody talking about how wild is the outro lmao 4:40
lmao no joke
That picture is shown earlier in the vid too.
1:03 It was here too 👀
Got a good laugh out of me. Truly how AI was meant to be used all along - supreme shitposting.
Fishial
“Don’t hate me because I’m artificial”
Dang, this kinda hits hard
Maybe if you got rid of that yee yee ahh haircut you got
@@GeneralKenobi69420 you'd get some tensors on your flux
@@kipchickensout Oh, better yet, maybe LoRA'll call your robot-ass
@@Crackhog
if it ever stops conversing with that quantum computer it’s been training with
@@arthurspooner1809 Eulerrr...
hello i'm the designer who works on ImageFX and i've been watching you for years. thank you for saying the interface is good :')
Are you actually the designer or is this just a troll comment?
@@venus_riotous5295 i'm actually the designer
@@venus_riotous5295 the fun part is you will never know
@@venus_riotous5295 seems like an odd thing to troll about lol
@@venus_riotous5295 Just a quick look at SM will tell you that
Don't wake me up for release of every new AI model, I don't wanna stay up forever
Elon, you say? Did not create open source AI, you say? How surprising, I say
in his defense, why should he?
@@yadusolparterrewhy shouldn't he ? We are all AI
@yadusolparterre He didn't "create" anything, he partnered with Flux and dumped the work on them, he's "created" it in name only
@@yadusolparterre Because he is processing with everything he got against OpenAI, as he considers himself a philanthropistic hero and wants OpenAI to re-open again and not totally because he is a jealous narcissist who wants personal gains.
@@RamirezGold
Revelation 3:20
Behold, I stand at the door, and knock: if any man hear my voice, and open the door, I will come in to him, and will sup with him, and he with me.
HEY THERE 🤗 JESUS IS CALLING YOU TODAY. Turn away from your sins, confess, forsake them and live the victorious life. God bless.
Revelation 22:12-14
And, behold, I come quickly; and my reward is with me, to give every man according as his work shall be.
I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the end, the first and the last.
Blessed are they that do his commandments, that they may have right to the tree of life, and may enter in through the gates into the city.
We need an AI that finds AI results and blocks them so you don't have to manually sift through AI slop every time you want to do something online
Just like ChatGPT vs ZeroGPT
fireship ai when
About a year ago. This is all fake. You're probably not even a real person either. I'm all alone here 😢
@@nickguh1323 I was about to do the same joke, but without the extra "i'm not like other viewers" part
TH-camr's will also be fully AI. I don't see why not.
How do i run fireship ai locally
@@nickguh1323 dang can't believe I'm not real
Tahnk you, you are the first big creator to get it right and mention that Grok's image generation is actually Flux.1 by some of the devs that came from Stability AI.
Okay, I can start an OF account.
ah hell naw😭
It's fraud, someone already did it :D
@@mattiafranzin6370 Why is it fraud?
Let's make only fans for ai!
1. Allow users to create girlfriends, provide fine tuning for images, texts and all
2. Allow them to sell those girlfriends and milk the suckers
3. Take a cut from that.
Pretty simple, viable business model.
@@mattiafranzin6370 many ppl already are doing it... so what?
For now, all AI images have that sheen shiny look to it that make it stand out. Only a matter of days before that is gone. Thanks technology.
There will be another market that will stand out.
Can easily solved by some filters
@@BrianMcKeelazy excuse. There'll truly be less jobs except for working at a data center.
nah, I think it will take corporations years and lots of money spent before they figure out that you cant replace specialists with a random generator
@@solarydays Fingers crossed, then.
A young AI researcher in Sweden was on TV demanding regulations against open source.
The main risk of AI is not open source. It's centralization and regulatory capture.
Google can take its censored AI and shove it. Open source FTW.
absolutely agree
If you don't realize the dangers of open source AI like this, then you are re***ded.
Astounding to see the pace of AI evolution, and how Flux from Black Forest Labs is leading the way. One key point for me is the potential misuse of impersonation, which companies and regulatory bodies will need to address in the future. Will be interesting to see where the advancements lead us and how they shape our view of reality.
It's already illegal to use a persons likeness for monetary gain. there... addressed.
I do think we're going to be in for a hard time with stuff like this. Definitely not a bad idea to set up a code word with family in case someone spoofs a voice, etc. The most fundamental problem though is that it feels almost impossible to actually control all of this. I think people are under the impression that the only way to train and run these things are with oodles of money and compute, but that is changing quite fast. Like a recent research paper showed how to train an image model from scratch (not at the level of Flux but better than Stable Diffusion 1.5/2) for less than $2,000, with 37m images (SD 1.5 cost $300k and used 4b training images). And even though SD took a lot to train, the result is a 2GB file that you can run locally offline on an iPhone. And those can already easily be modified to impersonate various people, change (inpaint) existing images, etc.
And that's all with the current hardware and current techniques. In a year or two, maybe it costs $200 to train a Flux-quality model and maybe you can run that on a new generation phone. Obviously video generation is a lot more intensive, but what is cutting edge now will be easier in a few years as well. Once the techniques are known publicly, it feels like it is pretty hard to actually regulate this stuff. Sure, we can clamp down on the big companies like OpenAI and Google and Grok that make it super easy for anyone to do online, but that doesn't really stop the fact that anyone can download an open weights model from online and use it however they want.
4:38 I could have sworn she was about to drop a Lamar from GTA V reference
From "just another javascript framework" to "just another AI."
Things change so quickly in this space - it is incredible. This makes me feel like I don't want to invest my time in learning a new model, because literally every month there is a new model that surpasses the old one.
Can't wait for the AI bubble to pop!🎈💥
delusion
@@riptechnoblademinecraftkin3187 Yeah that's what AI is, delusion. you nailed it👍
It won't pop cause people are so gullible to gen ai
@@sharon_ng true!
I'm sure the careless spending will dry up eventually, where anyone with "ai" in the product description gets thrown a ton of money. I don't think the tech itself is going away any time soon though.
you have the "commercially" part wrong. you can use the outputs commercially, just not for instance training a new model in order to sell that model. talked to some of the devs on Discord and they confirmed this part, it's also explicitly stated in the terms that you can use the outputs commercially.
0:54 It's on August 19, 2024 or Safar 14, 1446 AH and you're watching Fireship Videos about New Open-Source AI Model called Flux.1 on the Code Report Series.
Hello, definitely not ai girlfriend!
Truly open, free, accessible AI is the greatest indicator on who are the bootlickers for less free speech, less broken copyright, and more government overreach on expression.
AI should never be reserved for the top 0.01% of our societies.
Agreed 1000%. AI belongs to the people. AI deserves to be free.
You missed the point of the people who want restrictions for generative AI spectacularly. Or you intentionally and maliciously misrepresent their position.
@Xirtamani The government can sneak whatever they want into "restrictions" though. Including policies restricting user freedom. It's been done countless times. The internet and free market does best without government interference.
most humans are just animals, so it's better to not let this be abused
@@juangalton999 No, they can't. Because it's public. At least in proper democracies.
Free market does best without government interference, eh? You might wanna polish up your history knowledge in that area. Like, food safety and monopolies. To name two of the bigger examples.
I hope to run flux.1 pro equivalent locally one day on a 24GB vram GPU 😢
Hurray to competition😊
you already can with nf4.
i use FLUX locally on a 6gb vram card..... try forge ui or comfy
You can run a reduced flux model (flux1-dev-bnb-nf4) with 4GB of vram using forge stable diffusion ui.
@@looki3424 Of course you can, but it still isn't pro equivalent as I originally stated.
@@RedOneM i mean obviously, but it would be cheaper to use their pro online version than to buy a big ass graphic card i guess haha
Its insane that we dont heavy legislations when it comes to ai
We already have laws that prevent misuse of AI, no need to add more
It's too late, the cat is out of the bag and legislating open source AI out of existence will only make it worse as it will allow close source ones and their owners and backers to just do whatever they want while the rest of population it's in the dark.
I actually used Flux.1(Schnell) last week and made an Ai-image-generator project, some high quality images being generated from this model,
and it is quite insane how we had LLAMA 3.1 last month and so fast things changed since.
It is really hard to keep up with all the developments.
Welcome to Gen AI, what you learned last week is obsolete
I don't know if this thing justifies its existence anymore, coworker uses it and the computing power it takes to have just slightly more control with the prompt is insane. but other than very specific cases it did generate dogshit so.. do we need to spend that much money and time on maintaining tools that can only solve 1% of the problems?
@@solarydays I believe this is just the start of Gen AI, last year there was no any RAG but it has become powerful, there's always the hallucination and Catastrophic forgetting problems within the LLMs, but sooner or later it will be tuned. Also Devin a concept will be implemented and that would the real end times for many, if you think right now it is solving 1% then it might directly jump to 15%. The precision will be improved.
I love the tag for the woman holding a knife.
"Nice lady holding an eating utensil." 😂
These image generators like Flux are revolutionising the field. However, the potential for misuse does raise ethical concerns. It's a fine balance between innovation and protecting public interest.
Well said.
That's EXACTLY what my new AI girlfriend said.
Ok LLM boomer
@@luvsuneja OK Boomer? I don’t know how to break this to you…but it’s not 2020 anymore.
The most AI thing you can say.
So, when will the internet die?
It already did, people just don´t want to admit it.
Video is the last big thing. As soon as these video models get really good and open source every piece of media on the internet will degenerate into spam. At that point people will just stop using the internet.
never
Search for "Dead internet theory"
@@CoryTheSimmons Maybe people can finally return to interacting with each other in real life and actually being social.
Fireship is hands down the best channel on youtube
until Fireship Ai comes.
2:53 You can, in fact, use anything (image, sound, text, etc.) produced with ai for commercial purposes. There is no legal protection of ai generated content. Terms of service agreements can say whatever they want, it means nothing if they can't enforce it
someone please explain why we keep doing this i don’t think image generation to this level can be used for anything good 😭
Bro i was just taking pictures of a cross orb weaver spider and then there it is in the video 1:23
"Artificial smi-realistic cloner" prompt engineer
That's the brand new job title.
Lol
Just a note for the comment at 1:01 - GROK is not Flux 1.
GROK is a Chatbot / Personal Assistant
FLUX1 is an AI Model focused specifically on Image Generation
Although GROK uses FLUX1 for image generation, it is not the same as Flux 1 - by far.
"To see is to believe" will have a different impact now.
Sometimes I get sad thinking about all the cool things I could do if I knew how to code but then I remember that I'd still be too lazy to do any of them anyway
In my country a scandal blew up last week when it was discovered that in a private school, some students created using AI cp images of other students and sold it online. Currently there is no legislation in my country for images of you made with AI. I believe giving access to AI to the general public was a mistake.
Unfortunately this kind of gross abuse is something I constantly worry about with AI, and it's only going to become more normalized like any unethical behavior culture is steeped in for long enough to become calloused towards it.
1:24 It looks really good and generates mostly correctly, but still gets the number of legs wrong most of the time. Spiders are notoriously hard to generate while animals with 4 legs are easier to render correctly.
Where are the impersonation scams at 0:33?
It's in the Scam & Fraud section
Bro the way you show case the tech make's use to view the world in more COOL way. I hope I can learn or work and learn or gain more experience from you 🥺. Wishing to connect soon👍.
0 days without talking about AI...
This is the best of your videos I have watched and now I watch and study it everyday, thank you very much!
Still want to hear these defeatist predictions about AI? It's been the same for 2 years and the only thing that's changed so far is that LLMs have become paid (and stupider) XD
That is the reason why most innovative technology fail, when people start trying to make money out of it
You don't see how something like this can be dangerous? The level of fake news something like this will soon be able to produce is terrifying.
If you think AI is stupider now compared to two years ago, YOU'RE (empirically) the stupid one. Have fun with your janitor job 👋
@@Hhhh22222-w Huh? Examples? Isn't most technology available to the masses specifically because people can make money out of it? Why do you think they were making jet airliners, smart phones, solar panels, etc?
@@Hhhh22222-w That´s the only thing people need technology in the first place. If it can´t make money it has no use in our capitalist economy.
4:14 still cannot unsee it 30 years later
this shit got so real he had to manually put disclamer in the screen
The thing about Flux that is so insane is how accurate the depictions of your prompt are to the resulting image. You could describe to it a dream that you had in great detail using complete sentences, and it will spit out pretty much exactly what you described.
4:40 how has nobody mentioned the pic of kamala and trump doing 9/11?
Old news
I chuckled when I saw it
This man doesn’t know what he has done by unleashing this information into the normies.
0:07 "fireshiip" "Accurate text" lol
You can't redistribute the model or anything for commercial purposes, but you are allowed to use the outputs commercially.
These AI products induce my deepest boomer response to anything happening in the world right now by far.
What is the point of this technology? What problems do video and image generators solve? Seriously. These sorts of models are billion dollar meme generators *at best*. Even the more "responsible" models with guard rails intended to protect individuals don't solve a single, real problem.
It seems like nobody pushing generative AI can come up with a valid use case for any of it, just look at the latest ads for Gemini: "Generate an image of a cat. Woah! Now generate an image of another cat. Woah! Isn't this wacky fun?" It's completely insane.
They solve porn and mediocre/stock image content
It solves the repetitive tiled textures problem
Video game textures
It's a good question. Ever since I've started seeing AI generation of text and images, I've been thinking about mimicry in nature. What are the motivations for mimicking another animal? The answers are often not good for the animal being mimicked.
AI image generation and LLMs are a primer for what is to come. Slowly introducing 'artificial' interaction so that when robotics enter the main stream in full force humans will already be fully ready to accept them as 'normal'.
You had me at "lvl up my AIGF"!
Title: new dangerous model just dropped
Video: here is how to use the model
Man, this thumbnail is fire 💯
If y'all run out of VRAM use FP8 or NF4.
There are so many moving parts in this space, where would you learn where to begin?
All fun and games till paranormal dudes find a way to connect this with demons and spirits lol
You have no idea how closed source models work, so how can you know it hasn't been commandeered by one
Note that I'm pretty sure Civitai has generation and training this model
[Edit]
I Just checked, if you want to use the Standard model, you can basically only do 4 a day
Pro model is 4 every 2 days
Obviously you could just use the 'draft' setting which cuts that drastically at the cost of it looking like ass.
Draft gives you around 24 per day
This is not scary at all
lol I like that the tutorial we are given here is: step 1) draw a circle. step 2) draw rest of the owl
When I first started hearing about AI, I was so excited, now I just wanna pull the plug off the wall to be honest
I wish the website was simple, like Bing AI and Novel AI is
Stable diffusion models like Bing/Midjourney... are heavily censored and you cannot tune anything. They totally sux for creativity
I bet this one can't "generate an image of a toilet plunger without the handle" either.
Flux is what SD3 was supposed to be, and failed miserably!
Although Flux is fantastic, it certainly needs a better config if you want to run it locally, even my 3060 knows to struggle. Thankfully the community is finding it's ways! Just days after flux releasing, on day 1 i had constant crashes and my PC was going NUTS trying to generate images through ComfyUI. Then i switched to Forge and it made a HUGE difference! No more crashes, and only a few stutters while i still get the same quality, and better (maybe my comfyui was bugged or somth) resolution pictures.
I hope LORA training will be possible on 12 GB VRAM, kohya did begin training but after some tries and long hours it never gave me good pictures, just blurred to hell pictures.
AI is getting ahead of new js frameworks! What a time we live in!
Hold on to your papers!
oh wait, wrong channel
Not sure if I should be more impressed by the high quality of the picture, or the fact that all pictures shown in the videos had no messed up fingers
You got impressed by both
All big companies when a open source product gets much recognition: "Shut it down". Later they themself will make a copy of it to get money.
oy vey
The governments are doing the exact same thing. If they have their way soon only big tech companies and their CEOs and politicians will be able to use AI or at least a version that is not completely censored up the wazoo.
Literal wows. Can't wait till we get an AI model that can produce affordable housing.
bro I swear anything AI just goes over my head, it's crazy to live in such a time like this, feels like when Internet was just starting to emerge
And your pic is AI generated
@@FBI-A16 LMAO
nah the internet is starting to die, soon all the forums will be flooded to bots indistinguishable from real people and that will basically kill the point of the internet
@@users4007 The death of the internet could be the start of a new era. The generative AI era. When we stop searching and we start GeNeRaTiNg. I think it's progress.
@@FBI-A16 Well you're actually talking to a bot.... don't know if you realized it or not after you made your comment lol
4:38 if this is the end result, its not worth it.
Wdym? She’s pretty………
Pretty huge
@@alwayslg 💀
RIP Midjourney and Stable Difusion 3
Welcome to the coolest kid in the block
FLUX
Every week we get a "THIS IS GONNA BE WORLD CHANGING" ahh Ai model
“This is very dangerous, today we’ll see how to set it up” ❤️❤️
I like how for every pro of AI there are 10 serious cons, I get to generate funny memes while simultaneously having to keep pictures of my kids off the internet to stop pedophiles from creating ai child porn😁 yay progress!!!!
Why are you posting pictures of your kids on the internet anyway? Who do you think is looking at them lmao?
@@humanbeans4498 I dont actually have kids its just a point, but as to yours... I dont know how to tell you this but almost every single person I know posts pictures of their kids... Im astonished you think thats abnormal.
Hah yeah... I'll mess with the fun stuff at the times, but partly that is to distract from the "hopefully we don't all lose our jobs and/or die lol" .
3:19 He still puts "Hi mom" 😔 The kitty makes it even more sad
If I were to have a nickle for every new top tier AI model, I would have a hell load of nickles
I mean the license dont prohibit you to use their model to generate image. All generated image are not copyrighted I believe. It is just you cant use the model as a web service to profit.
3:43 I.... LoL'd real hard for some reason
Kind of rich coming from Google about ways Generative AI can be used as a manipulation tool, as it actively works on developing / pushing it to the masses.