Why Haven’t We Found Dinosaur and Human Fossils Together?
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 5 ส.ค. 2024
- Why haven’t we found dinosaur and human fossils together? In season 2, episode 3 of The Genesis Account of Noah’s Ark, Calvin Smith, a Bible-believing Christian, shares his answer to this question.
This is an episode of our series titled The Genesis Account of Noah’s Ark. You can watch the other episodes of the series here: www.Answers.tv/the-genesis-ac... - บันเทิง
Without watching my answer is... People wouldn't have been hanging out with dinosaurs.
That’s a good way to look at it
I'm sure you're confused. Man and dinosaurs did not coexist temporally, at the same time or in paleo-proximity, and as a result, they are not found in the same layers during archaeological excavations. The term 'paleo-proximity' refers not to direct physical proximity-as in living and dying next to each other-but to the relative positions within geological or paleontological layers. This clarifies that their fossils are separated by millions of years in the sedimentary record. If you accept that fossils are real things, then you must accept that under no conditions would it be possible to fossilize creature remains in 8,000 years. Not even close.
@@HipstarMusic It was a joke. :)
@@BigBoPete I'm relieved to read that. I promise you, I'll receive responses defending your satirical position from some who literally believe this.
So that kills the idea of human and dinosaur foot prints found together.
What makes people thank that the animals on the Ark were grown, wouldn't it be more practical to have young ones aboard?
Yes, young fertile ones to repopulate the Earth...God did the natural selection in that instance.
exactly
especily looking how big the ark was
Oh, you mean birds?
@@davidgardner863 No...birds lived at the time of dinosaurs and dinosaurs did not evolve from birds.
Interest note about The Ashley Phosphate Beds in SC, An enormous phosphate graveyard that contained mixed remains of man with land and sea animals, notably crocodilians, ichthyosaurs, hadrosaurs, plesiosaurs, whales, sharks, zeuglodon, monkeys, rhinos, horses, mastodons, mammoths, porpoises, elephants, deer, pigs, dogs, and sheep.
Nope. You're mixing every time period in those beds into one gigantic fossil. And it isn't. The Ashley Phosphate Beds, located in South Carolina, are a well-known geological formation that has yielded numerous fossils, particularly from the late Cretaceous and early Tertiary periods. Some claims have been made that human and dinosaur fossils have been found together in these beds, suggesting that humans and dinosaurs coexisted. However, these claims are not supported by the mainstream scientific community for several reasons:
1. **Geological Context**: The fossils found in the Ashley Phosphate Beds come from a variety of geological periods. The area has layers from different times, including the Cretaceous (when dinosaurs lived) and the Tertiary (after the extinction of the dinosaurs). This mixing of fossils from different periods can lead to misinterpretations.
2. **Misidentification**: Some fossils claimed to be human have often been misidentified. Fossils can be difficult to interpret, especially when fragmented or incomplete. What may initially appear to be a human bone could often be something else.
3. **Scientific Consensus**: The overwhelming consensus in the scientific community is that non-avian dinosaurs went extinct about 66 million years ago at the end of the Cretaceous period, while anatomically modern humans appeared around 300,000 years ago. This substantial time gap makes coexistence impossible.
4. **Lack of Verifiable Evidence**: No verifiable, peer-reviewed evidence has been published in reputable scientific journals supporting the claim that human and dinosaur fossils have been found together in the Ashley Phosphate Beds or any other location. Such extraordinary claims would require extraordinary evidence, which has not been provided.
In summary, while the Ashley Phosphate Beds are a rich source of fossils, the evidence does not support the idea that humans and dinosaurs lived together. The claims of coexistence are not accepted by the scientific community due to lack of credible evidence and the significant time gap between the existence of non-avian dinosaurs and humans.
If you look into the livescience article and the incident surrounding what was found. One scholar refuted that it wasn’t a pterosaur at all but rather it was one larger single fish fossil
Not finding human and dinosaur fossils buried together isn’t an argument against their coexistence. We also don’t find coelacanth and whale fossils buried together, but both coelacanth and whale are alive and coexist today. Just like how we have ancient carvings of dinosaurs in places like Carlisle Cathedral (two brass sauropod carvings are on Richard Bell’s tomb, he died in 1496) and Ta Prohm temple in Cambodia (a stone Stegosaurus carving is on one of the walls, completed circa 1200 AD), both proving that man and dinosaur lived together as late as 500 years ago. Dinosaurs are just likely extinct now, just as many other animals have gone extinct in the past several decades/centuries.
Not a fair comparison, whales is one species or however amount of variations,same as coelacanth, dinosaurs ruled the earth there are 700 known dinosaur species and probably thousands more in reality, they were literally everywhere just like human
the blades on that temple "stegosaurus" are border decorations and are present in other panels.
as for your other examples, they are as much evidence of dinos coexisting with humans as the gargoyles adorning medieval cathedrals ae proof of such creatures existing.
birds still exist and they're descended from dinos.
It's not that they are not found geographically close to each other. It is that they are never found in the same rock layers. Dinosaurs are always buried deeper than humans
@@mattbrook-lee7732 But per the aforementioned evidence of the Stegosaur Stone Carving in Cambodia's Ta Prohm Temple and the Sauropod Brass Carving at Carlisle Cathedral, England, Dinosaurs did coexist with humans in the not-too-distant past, as late as 500 years ago. Just because two animals aren't found in the same fossil layers doesn't mean they didn't coexist at some point.
@ryans8081 the stegosaurus carving looks nothing like a stegosaurus. It has a large head and a droopy tail. There are many lizards alive today that look like the pictures in the cathedral. None of this gets anywhere near counting as evidence. Whilst it's not impossible some non avian dinosaurs survived there is no evidence of them in 66 million years of fossils.
Plenty of text of dragons ....dragon =dinosaurs before the word dinosaurs was invented
Bingo 💯
There are also dragoons.
There’s no evidence that Dinosaurs coexisted with humans. Ignorance isn’t good even if your delusion demands it.
where there is none lol
@@pa5287 they were hunted to extinction. Slow moving, lots of meat.
So the answer to "Why haven't we found dinosaur and human fossils together?" is "Because we haven't found any dinosaur and human fossils together yet."
This is what happens when you spend more time teaching your students about evolutionary theory than critical thinking.
we have found human fossils in supposed 100 million year old dakota sandstone 10 fossils four women a baby and five men ofcourse they dont accept it but its irrefutable
Once the lies of the controlers are revealed and main scheme mee-dee-ah is replaced with real science, it will be game over for the lies, eg "safe and effective" same source, different tenticle.
We did find dinosaur fossils and only dinosaur fossils as humans weren’t around the time dinosaurs, us humans appeared during the rein of mammals during the ice age and before the ice age and after the ice age, and if humans were around the time of the dinosaurs then not only we would be eaten but also killed, but we also struggle to find food as the dinosaurs at the time were big
@mrjohnnyjohnster3940 you can't KNOW that as cen$orschip has the wo6 under THEIR witchcraft.
In Mongolia there is the biggest field of footprints on earth, with multiple dinosaur and human footprints criss crossing and from memory over 100 different types.
Lots of other proof has been relegated to the bin by Smith
Son
Ian's
@tristantorres7511 seek and you will find that Dennis swift shows the ica stones carved by very talented south American Indians riding on, being drawn along in carts and even being eaten by dragons as they were called in the day.
Edit yes you are correct dinosaurs we're called behemoth and the sea and river dwellers leviathan.
See Job 40: 15 through to 41 : 34
I still have a question that If the Flood killed all living humans, except Noah's family, then why have we never found Human fossils from that time period. There should have been quite a few yet not one has ever been documented that can be attributed to the flood.
I recall that there are actually many fossils discovered that are from the before the flood. Consider, for example, the human fossil discovered in solid stone at the copper mine in Utah. The stone the human skeleton was found in is millions of years older than the human, according to the flawed thinking of most scientists.
That man's fossil is green from the copper. Thought that was a neat fun fact!
P.S. Just in case my first comment is forcefully hidden on the site, I made mention of the human fossil in the Utahn copper mine's ancient stone.
I would suggest that they are crushed into fossil fuel. Ash is a catalyst to fossilize. Coat has great evidence of being of a young earth. They found a cup embedded into a so called 300 million year old piece of coal. Dinosaur Dave has some interesting facts. They also found Dinosaur bones with soft tissue. 65 million years= Wrong.
New York has more people now than the entire population living in the world two three thousands years ago. We reached a billion recently
No one likes brainwashing
We didn't find human remains in the geological record alongside dinosaurs because God said he would wipe out humanity completely except for Noah and his family.
Is there ANY validity, when someone asks why no human and dinosaur fossils have been found together, in answering with a speculative “not yet”?
No
No there’s not anything to support this man’s bewildering statement. Honestly anyone defending this video whatsoever are as naive as the man literally claimed
Not if you're basing your entire hypothesis on speculation that it might happen one day
@@IanM-id8or Have you bothered to watch the video at all? I doubt that you have. Y' might want to watch a video before trying to comment on it or answer any questions regarding it.
2:20 why would humans and dinosaurs have to be buried together. do you think they colonized amongst each other in harmony. do you think neither of them preyed on each other? what is it about human survival history that you don't understand
"What is it... you don't understand?"
Let me answer for him.
"Every single thing that my bible doesn't explain."
Dinos lived everywhere on the globe
@@LDrosophila Right, just in different strata of rock layers than humans.
A related question - why do vast layers of Cambrian and Ordovician limestone and sandstone have no vertebrates in them at all? Stratigraphy looks like there were long periods of living things that existed long there were marine vertebrates, much less terrestrial tetrapods.
Que? Ordovician strata does indeed have many vertebrate fossils of the earliest fish. The Cambrian has fossils of the basal vertebrate ancestors, namely _Pikaia_ and _Haikouichthys._
Layers, we don't have to show you no stinking layers.
The layer do NOT INDICATE millions or billions of years, but were laid over hours days, weeks, months during the year-long Biblical Flood.
@@zumbinisgm If all the strata were deposited at the same time why don't they all show the same radiometric age? Even if that age is wrong why do we get over 3 billion years' worth of variation from the bottom to the top?
@@samburns3329. Because it’s faulty.
Okay I’m a Catholic and a creationist, but I’m also a lifelong Dinosaur and paleontology enthusiast. I need answers about the rock layers, not individual fossil sites. The Hell Creek and Morrison formations, for example, represent two completely separate ecosystems which overlap in the same region, and no two species are the same in either rock layer. Human and modern mammal fossils are similarly found in completely different layers than dinosaurs, with no overlap. I need an explanation for that because it definitely seems to contradict the idea of only 1500 years between creation and the flood.
Because that idea is wrong. Study more about pollen deposition and its relationship to Stokes Law. Further, there are huge numbers of igneous formations that intrude into sedimentary formations and the amount of heat released during their cooling further falsifies the tales of Genesis as literal events. Rather read it as a metaphor, written by people who could not understand their world in anything but the terms they had available to them at that time.
Note that none of what I said indicates "god does not exist". I just say that a literal interpretation of the Bible is just flat-out wrong and harmful.
Unfortunately they ignore evidence that doesn't fit their narrative. Look up the haymond formation, 15000 layers of sand and shale (with animal burrows in the shale) and YEC won't even attempt explaining it.
Check out professor Walter veith evolutionist to creationist. 😉
@@WholisticWomen-wl2sy And he specifically ignores Stokes Law and the heat problem as well as pollen and ostracods. He's in it for the money and people pay him. This is what a good education does - makes you pay attention to details. He hopes you'll ignore them while he plays to your preconceived notions. So?
NEXT!
Please provide a list of your sources for this video.
"just my imagination once again,
ran away with me.
it was just my imagination
runnin' away with me"
old song lyrics. sorry, i couldn't resist.
Da Bible...
DUH!!1!
What a great time to educate people with a lack of knowledge about evolution. Why do you care if they have sources? Naivety is not evil. The people simply need an education.
@@throgmortonartstudio2402 "Why do you care if they have sources?... The people simply need an education."
Sounds like you need an education.
Aight so just started the video, may I please see the sources he's drawing the claim from about modern animals being found in old rock layers?
There have been over 400 mammals found with dinosaur remains...most of their remains look like their modern day counterparts. This is can be readily looked up.
Go back and watch the 2 previous videos.
@@shannaconda3434 he doesn't give any examples there either. There are none
I think my last comment might've been flagged for posting so many links, so ya might have to google these ones to find the information he's referencing:
110 Million Year Old Duck/Loon:
NY Times: Duck Look Alike Reveals Bird Evolution
164 Million Year Old Jurassic "Beaver":
Nature International Weekly Journal of Science: Jurassic Beaver Swims Into View
(The fossil shown in the video is 10k to 50k years old:
Smithsonian Magazine: Why Did These Human-Sized Beavers Go Extinct During the Last Ice Age?)
125 Million Year Old Badger Like Creature:
National Public Radio: This fossil of a mammal biting a dinosaur captures a death battle's final moments
120 Million Year Old Platypus:
ABC News: Fossil suggests platypus lived in dinosaur times
(The fossil model shown in the video is a model of a platypus 5 million to 25 million years old:
Cairns Aquarium in Australia: Model of the Riversleigh Platypus)
140 Million Year Old Pine:
Geology Page: Oldest pine fossils reveal fiery past
160 Million Year Old Squirrel/Lemur Like Creature:
Science News: Fossils push back origins of modern mammals
The articles about the duck, beaver, and platypus are from the video @shannaconda3434 mentioned, but everything else I had to reverse image search. I'm not sure why he used the young fossils of beavers and platypuses in the video, but he's still speaking truthfully that these kinds of animals did exist during the time of dinosaurs. Keep in mind when he says modern animals, he means modern kinds of animals, not species.
In the paper, published April 18 in the journal Nature, the researchers speculate that the coelacanth's relatively unchanged deep-sea habitat, and an apparent lack of predation over thousands to millions of years, means this ancient fish didn't need to change much to survive. (See more pictures of deep-sea creatures.)
Thank you for making these videos.
Please help me understand this argument better, that it might be more useful to me.
I would have thought that, if the great flood created a large number of the now-observed fossils, then any given group of fossils should nearly always contain a wide mix of organisms, including humans, because -all- of the living humans, and -all- of the other land dwelling creatures and plants (except those in the ark) were killed and fossilized together within a very small window of time.
People had already congregated into cities by the time of the great flood, so perhaps the chances of finding a human fossil vary greatly depending on location? The world is large, so perhaps we just aren’t looking in the right place?
On the other hand, it would also seem that there would be fossil beds with high concentrations of humans along with domesticated animals and plants; created when civilizations were consumed by the waters. Perhaps cities and farms tend to be located in places unlikely to fossilize? Or perhaps they tend to get buried so deep that they aren’t likely to be found? Perhaps new cities exist on top of the fossilized ones, preventing their excavation?
Also, if the great flood is responsible for creating most of the fossils we see today, I do not understand why the vast majority of fossils found would be of marine life. While the great flood may have disrupted marine environments so much as to kill many marine organisms, the death of all land creatures was explicitly universal.
I would very much appreciate your insight to be better prepared to meet these objections.
Thanks again.
Those are great questions. Some of them are answered in many videos, not just the ones from answers in genesis.
on top of that it should be considered that the bible only describes two original humans, but many animals, and the population growth of most animals is much faster than for humans, so by the time of the flood there must have been exponentially more animals than humans, and with humans typically living densely in cities and urban areas that most animals stay far away from, it shouldn't be a surprise that humans and dinosaurs haven't been found fossilized together.
oh, and humans tend to have a certain ability called boat building, so most people or at least a large portion probably survived in hastily made boats for a while after the flood started before being killed by the catastrophic weather and volcanic activity
Scott,
The globe is too big to get everything mixed up the way that argument describes.
Things sink too fast to go far enough to get mixed with very much that is even a short distance away.
When you throw a ball 30mph how far does it go before it hits the ground?
95% + of all fossils are marine organisms.
That’s because of the way the sediment was piled onto the land.
One of the most curious things about the Flood is that all of the pre existing land seems to be stripped completely down to basement rock.
That’s because the continents broke apart and slid across the ocean floor scooping sediment like a shovel being pushed across the ground. The result is scouring like an abrasive pad.
it’s note worthy that cambrian strata tends to be close to the Northern and western shorelines of North America, but largely absent further inland.
That’s because NA moved toward the Northwest after breaking apart.
A lot of the objections are just nonsensical assumptions that are not based in reality and don’t understand what events actually transpired.
Let’s be glad we don’t find many human fossils, and virtually none associated with the Flood.
My personal opinion is that most land animals and people lived in well vegetated land so they would more likely be with coal deposits if they could be found at all.
Otherwise, the water was moving from Northwest to Southeast so most animals would be swept the opposite direction that the continents were moving.
particularly around the mid atlantic ridge where the split occurred.
You wont find the answers because there was never a global flood. Human remains can't fossilize because it takes millions of years to do that. And there is no magical sky god creating then killing life.
Humans are intelligent, mobile and can swim. Anyone not killed by the breaking open of the fountains of the deep would have sought out higher ground and started gathering as much food as they could. If driven together with animals they would have fought off any predators, then survived as long as they could on the meat. Finally they would have started swimming where they would have become a meal for surviving predators in the oceans. This means that there likely weren't many human fossils to begin with. Plus which about 70% of the planet is still covered by water. As far as I know there are no archaeological digs taking place in the ocean.
so where are the human fossils? that's what I want to know. I don't care if they are suppose to be together or not. I just want to know where the human fossils are? I mean I am a creationist and not an evolutionist so I just want to know, why are there no human fossils. I don't want to give an explanation that doesn't get to the point. some people just want to know where they are. so where are they? Have they been found anywhere? anywhere at all?
First of all, how do you know if they are or aren't together?.. I don't trust the scientists either, I am also a creationist.. and the powers that be, manipulate what is told to the public.. btw, the "dragons" of old could have been dinosaurs.. and remember Genesis 6 and the book of Enoch..
This has been covered. The humans were not dumb anmails. And just stand there and be covered. Remember it rained for 40 days. The tried to save themselves. But ended up dieing. Only a few were covered by settlement. And yes we have found some. But they like to call them cave men haha. The rest were eaten. After the fall. Sharks started eating meat bunch of dead human flowing around dinner time. There you go sir glad to help. Preacher and wifey from Humboldt CA Jesus is God
@@sscot720
Why not trust scientists...?
They are the only ones objectively searching for anwsers.
Look up Lucy human fossil. I believe it’s the oldest human ancestors. Technically the species is Australopithecus Afrensis.
@@amfgoe255 and they lived 6,000 years ago?
Here in Texas we have a fossil footprint of a dinosaur , beside a HUMAN FOOTPRINT! Yes its real....
No they haven’t.
@@bdawg-qj9bqactually they have
@@bdawg-qj9bq Yes ,
No truth in this. Starting your believe with a lie?
@@BossMr.X It is absolutely true
Can you do a video on the topic _Do humans and apes have a common ancestor?_
I think that’s the area of disagreement theists and atheist have the most on the topic of creationism
If they did find them together, do you think they wouldn't cover it up ?
Why would they do that?
@@mattbrook-lee7732 for the same reason why there have been so many "missing link" hoaxes.......
@@mattbrook-lee7732Yes, bee cause it's a job. Ate Theist sea scientist as these holy pea pole teaching truth two the world, but scientist are under a pay roll. Meaning, day are extinction of the money givers. Day don't do or reveal what day wont two.
Example - millions of dollars are paid two find Ed -v dent for neo darwinism. If a scientist under the pay toll brings proof of dinosaur width men, heal bee fired bee cause he was ant paid two find Ed v dents against neo darwinism. That's scientist wood cover it up,So he Ken feed hisses family.
It's like paying a engineer two create you a boat, but day build a air plane bee cause day think is better. The engineer wood get fired bee cause he was ant paid two do that.
Yes, bee cause it's a job. Millions are sent to find evidence of neo darwinism, but if you bring evidence against it, you wheel bee fired. You have two do what you are paid two do. ate theist bee leave scientist are pea pole hear two tell truth two the world,but it's a job like inn knee other. Day wheel cover it up two feed their families. Scientist are extinction of their payers. Day don't do what day wont two do or reveal two the world what they won't two reveal.
Yes, they 100 purr cent wood. Aye explained this inn detail,but the platform took down my comets six times. Atheist don't under stand how the science job works.
My family lived in Acambaro, GTO, Mexico. - look up Acambaro dinosaur figures. People try and claim they are fabrications; but, they've never been proven false.
Have they been proven true?
@@brendankeith249 Erle Stanley Gardner of Perry Mason fame (a former LA DA), went down to Acambaro Mexico in the 1950's to investigate the 10's of thousands of twice baked figurines found in the area. Many of them were of anatomically correct dinosaurs. As the figurines were being dug up from clay beds at the base of a nearby mountain...Gardner wanted to see if he could prove that they were legitimate. He wound up digging up the foundation of a home in Acambaro that belonged to the towns police chief and found figurines there. That home had been built some 40 or 50 years earlier as I recall. Since many of the town buildings were made of adobe...he also found fragments of the dinosaur figurines in the adobe of town building exteriors. Gardner believed the figures to be genuine artifacts. He wrote about it in his book "The Host with the Big Hat". Dr Don Patton has done work on this. Of further interest may be the Peruvian Ica Burial stones found by the Conquistadors in the early 1500's Peru. They depicted man and dinosaurs interacting as well.
I looked it up. They are modern fakes. Some even resemble aliens and flying saucers.
@@brendankeith249 evidence points to it.
@@brendankeith249 Erle Stanley Gardner of Perry Mason fame, who was also a former Los Angeles Cty DA investigated these figurines in the 1950s and found them to be legitimate even finding parts of some of the figurines in the adobe building in town. He wrote about it in the Host with the Big Hat..
I'm surprised you didn't mention the times that mammal and dinosaur fossils were found together, like the footprint of a dinosaur in hardened mud over a human footprint.
And another guy says that it’s because they didn’t live near each other.
Those are NOT "human " footprints.
@@walkergarya What is it?
@@CoolPaDuke They are the foot prints of other dinosaurs. The distance between each print is too far to be human, the depth of each print is the same as the other prints showing the weight of the animal was greater than a human.
@@walkergarya I didn't know there were dinosaurs with feet that looked exactly like human feet.
Here is a question I have. Ancient artifacts that we are still finding, alot of them are still intact. Along with ancient mummies. Wouldn't that have been destroyed?
Depends on what they were made from. The London Hammer (or whatever its called) and the bell found in coal are both mostly metal. Many of the others are made of stone or other hard materials.
Do we find many human remains in elephant graveyards?
or Elephants in human graveyards ?
Thanks for this.
Can i ask, what is your opinion on the 'Ashley phosphate beds' in South Carolina?
The Ashley phosphate beds are a man-made collection of mixed fossils produced from the detritus of various phosphate mines in the Charleston SC area. When phosphate was dug the miners would often find fossils mixed in. These fossils were discarded in piles next to the mine. Eventually all the fossils from the mines were collected dumped in a big pile into the Ashely river. This is from the book *Paleontology of the “Ashley Phosphate Beds” of Charleston: Insights from Northbridge Park, Charleston, South Carolina*
"A man-made deposit at Northbridge Park near Charleston, South Carolina, consists of phosphatic nodules, fossils, and mud dredged from the bottom of the Ashley River; nodules and fossils lay strewn across the banks of the river. This artificial deposit is likely representative of deposits mined extensively in the late nineteenth century and widely referred to as the “Ashley Phosphate Beds.” Many of the taxa discovered at Northbridge Park were historically reported from the phosphate beds, and include sharks, rays, bony fish, sea turtles, giant birds, whales, dolphins, sea cows, and land mammals. Some of these bear adhering matrix indicating origin from the Oligocene Ashley Formation. Others lack matrix but have short geochronologic ranges and are derived from the Ashley Formation, Lower Miocene Marks Head Formation, Lower Pliocene Goose Creek Limestone, and Pleistocene Wando Formation."
They're very comfortable
@@mattbrook-lee7732 except for the occasional spikes.
@@mattbrook-lee7732 LOL
I will look that up , thanks for sharing that information
Well, people, then and now, would likely not be hanging out with Dinosaurs.
So why are there carvings & etchings in almost all know civilisations all around the world that shows man walked with dinosaurs.I’ve lost count with pictures.👍🏻Cheers.
@@martinwolrich6464 give me some examples
Dinosaurs came in all shapes and sizes. They were all over the place. Humans would have been in regular contact with at least small dinosaurs if they lived at the same time.
@@martinwolrich6464 Citations needed.
@@ABC_Master... I've seen several, the one I do remember is that bas relief carving on an Asian temple many thousands of years old. It seems to look exactly like a stegosaurus.
Jeremiah 49:33 And Hazor shall be a dwelling for dragons, and a desolation for ever; there shall no man abide there, nor any son of man dwell in it.
Could you have possibly picked a more random off-topic line of scripture?????????????????????????????
Where is that, Antarctica? Seems like the Lord would dump the ice and rock on the worst of places where the most evil resided, or as far away from Noah that he remains safe in the ark.
The dragon of desolation= desolation.
That shows no evidence that Dinosaurs are being described. You’re taking words literally.
@@INTJ10551 Job 40, Job 41 , Isaiah 27
In Glen Rose, Texas, there are fossilized dinosaur footprints in the river and creek beds throughout the area, most of which are concentrated in Dinosaur Valley State Park. In many places, people have found fossilized human footprints alongside and even inside the dinosaur footprints.
So true...
they are footprints we have all probably walked by the remains of something extinct at one point
Those are NOT "human " footprints.
yes they are@@walkergarya
Thank you, I was hoping someone was going to mention that, so I didn’t have to.
Here is what we have found in different geological layers: Species are wholly different and increasingly complex from bottom to top regardless of size.
Ive often wondered if you blow up a balloon without helium it bounces around if touched. Shouldn't gravity hold it down.?
The balloon material is so light that it doesn’t just come flying down like a glass off a table
@JohnnyLaww Oh that explains it.
The "Story of the Coelacanth's Lung" sounds amazingly like a "flood event story" to me. All of the key elements - the stress on the predator causing it to regurgitate, the lung being "fresh", the pterosaurs trying to eat and - and being buried with it by a catastrophic event - all sound like a string of events that happened during the flood. The only part the evolutionists left out was the actual flood, and the date they give is of course very wrong.
Wow. Checkmate. Very impressed with this one. God bless.
The sarcasm in this comment is awesome!
@@CB-THE-OG Wasn't even joking. This was really how I thought 🤷♂️
Can someone seriously explain what the animals would have eaten after they got off the ark, specifically the carnivores. Also how did kangaroos get to Australia or any marsupial for that matter?
There were 14x herds and flock animals than carnivores all of them could survive on plants though carnivores don’t prefer to.
And continental drift and land bridges which would have disappeared over time and at the end of the ice age following the global flood. Hope this helps.
@@DaysofElijah317fish, eggs, anything that was being produced on board the ark. The Lord always supplies every need.
There may have been some dead animals God purposely left on the surface for the carnivores to eat.
It’s not explainable. That’s why we know it’s fiction.
@@bdawg-qj9bq bdawg, there is no fiction in the Holy Bible at all. It is all the words of God.
An ark is a box , a rectangle, it's not a sailing vessel as so often depicted. By ROUNDING the corners for stream lined effects which it did not need, you cut off the volume available for animals.
Please show your proof/evidence for badgers, beavers, squirrels, and platypus being found in Mesozoic strata.
“I am quite conscious that my speculations run beyond the bounds of true science..."
"It is a mere rag of an hypothesis with as many flaws and holes as sound parts.” -C. Darwin
Any idea what he was referring to or the context? If not you shouldn't use the quote. If you do know then you are deliberately misusing it
Darwin probably said this while frustrated with the classification of barnacles. Not to mention he had no idea about genetics, DNA, and the selfish gene theory. His theory was correct but he didn't know exactly why.
Ah, typical creationist quote-mining. As per usual, creationists are liars.
Darwin never said or wrote this as written here. Both sentences are from separate letters. It was never a single quote as written here. Also both letters were written before he wrote origin of species.
Creationists just can't come up with anything true to say so they just keep on lying
@@mattbrook-lee7732 he was referring to plant evolution. And notice your reply was not to provide observable examples of how roses evolve into sunflowers.
What about South Carolina where they reported finds of fossils of whales, dinosaurs, sea creatures, human, all kinds in the same layer? They have been busy mining out the area for farm fertilizers, etc ever since (can't have too many being reported after all, the news might get out.) Also there is their footprints together found in several places together including the US. One print even had a dinodude stepping into/overlapping a human footprint.
No they never found dinosaurs or humans. But if you want to fall for creationist nonsense, fill your boots
@@mattbrook-lee7732 I've seen some of them and anyone can look up the plateaus of Turkmenistan. Try doing some research Mr nonsense.
@@markhaseley3304 like I said. Fill your boots. Nobody cares
@@mattbrook-lee7732 lol, okay you don't care about science, archaeology, and facts from fraud, scams, misidentification, lies, etc. Gotcha. Enjoy your beliefs and tall tales
@@markhaseley3304 👍
What about the t Rex foot print in the same rock as a human foot print found in glen rose Texas?
Was that located in the Paluxy river?
Carl Bach has a museum in Glen Rose Texas that has a dinosaur foot print and a human foot print together in rock.
It's Carl Baugh, not Bach. You're talking about the known fraud Alvis Delk "Flintstone" carving with the anatomically impossible Fred Flintstone foot added to a real theropod fossil track. 🙂
@@OgdenCrimmcramer8162 Yes. Creationists just repeat the same lies over and over, even after they've been debunked.
@@MrHominid2U One guy makes a mistake and it is all you have against creationists lol. That is your evidence?
@@paulmerritt2484 The spelling mistake in this case is just an indication of sloppiness and unseriousness. The REAL mistake is citing a KNOWN FORGERY with a fake human footprint and calling that evidence.
@paulmerritt2484 What is my evidence for what? Creationists have no evidence to support any of their claims and the fact they continue to repeat claims that were thoroughly debunked tells me they they are either delusional or liars. If you're asking for evidence of an ancient Earth or evolution that would take too many volumes to fit in a comments section & you'd just ignore all of it anyway.
Question should be this...
If dinosaurs are older than man..And man has been on the planet for millions of years, where are all the fossils of humans?
We have found human fossils, fossils are really rare most are gone no trace, dinosaurs ruled over 140milliom years, def way more than human, the amount of fossils we found probably less than 0.1%
Many human foscils have been found. They just don't talk about them in relation to dinosaurs because it would disprove their pet theory.
Humans one species dinosaurs have 700 known species and probably thousands more in reality consider they dominated earth for over 140milliom years compare to humans 200k-2m years. Way more dinosaurs population than human, and of course there are human fossils found
@@stevebomonster huh?
@@stevebomonster oh sorry it was in my alerts and I didn't notice it was for someone else. Sorry for butting in.
I guess my question is --- Were the continents still together before the flood? If not, how would any of those animals get to the ark from other continents? Once again if not, after the flood, it's only been what? around 5000 years since the flood? If every land animal from insects to dinosaurs were drowned, how did so many different and diverse species spread around the world in such a short period of time?
God is like Thanos don’t you know, they were all snapped back into existence. To answer your question requires logic, which they all possess and use it when applied to everything else except religion. It’s actually a waste of time because you’re going to get some made up reason of how it all happened in 10 minutes
@@Panterluca So in other words, you don't have a clue.
Forgetting all the movies, if you seriously study and pay attention to the age of the dinosaurs and the appearance of humans as we are today, you will realize that over 30 MILLION YEARS separated us from Dinosaurs. One other interesting point, every time I read Dinosaurs went extinct or were unsuccessful because they simply couldn't adapt. Remember one Fact, Dinosaurs ruled the earth for 250 MILLION YEARS, we have only been around for about 8 million and we have almost annihilated ourselves several times.
No, actually, dinosaurs are included in the land animals that were created earlier on Day 6 of Creation week. At most, they were created minutes to hours before Adam.
It's actually almost 66 million years between non-avian dinosaurs and humans, but who's counting? 🙂
@@sciencerules2825 Evolutionists are. Long ages are important to them, or the theory doesn't work (not that it does anyway)!
Well if there was I’m sure The museum of natural history probably covered it all up
Yeah, it’s all a big conspiracy.
For sure...300 years of natural sciences, thousands and thousands of scientists from every branch and discipline are all in a giant conspiracy to cover up what they really know...that a god who could only think of cursing, drowning, burning, murder, genocide and human sacrifice is actually the creator of everything,😂😂😂😂
Waste of energy, they sure can't fool you, now can they.
I am trying to figure out why it's so important to think one thing or another.
@@kayakMike1000 Because the evolutionary naturalism view insistently denies the Biblical revelation and truth about the history of the Earth.
@@zumbinisgm I denies Jack and the bean stalk too.
Don't forget marine life fossils getting found on higher ground. That helps support the flood explanation.
Marine fossils formed on the beds of ancient seas. Millions of years later plate tectonics lifted the beds with the fossil to much higher elevations. Science has known that for a century which is probably why creationists haven't heard about it yet.
@@samburns3329 exactly. I was going to say just that but you beat me to the punch. Sea fossils are found high up in the Himalayas. Happened when India collided with Asia and forced the mountains upwards.
@@samburns3329 Only of the 'millions of years ago' narrative was true. Is that why our alleged shared common 'ape like ancestors' found remains allegedly from 'millions of years ago' aren't very different to ape kingdom examples around today?
@@samburns3329 "which is probably why creationists haven't heard about it yet."
what, you are trying to make a creationist mad?
@@samburns3329 Again, in the event of TH-cam not notifying you of posts, Only if the 'millions of years ago' narrative was true. Is that why our alleged shared common 'ape like ancestor's' found remains allegedly from 'millions of years ago' aren't very different to ape kingdom examples around today? Where's your supporting evidence, evidence that hasn't came from career 'evolutionists'?
Well done! Thanks!
I know for a fact Noah's flood is true because back in 2002 or 3 I was standing in my living room leaning against my couch and God gave me a vision of Noah standing at the entrance of the ark he looked so proud he had long white hair and a long white beard and he was holding a shepherds staff that curved at the top then I looked down and saw two giraffes two elephants and two rhinos two of every living animal God created going to Noah they stretched out as far as my eyes could see. I told people but they said it was just my imagination. But it is absolutely true !!! I didn't learn about the ark encounter they had built until about two years ago so now I am trying to tell everyone that will listen because people need to repent.!!! I know now that Jesus Christ is the ark !!! I'm praying that God will help share my vision now because God's timing is always perfect. 🙏 In the mighty name of Jesus Christ I pray.AMEN
Sure, that totally happened.
Nurse she's out of her bed again.
I don't think you're crazy you probably did have a vision... Well keep telling your story no matter what others think. If it's YOUR TRUTH. It's funny how people will assume you are crazy bc of believing in the flood when most of them believe in many genders when we can only see ♂️ ♀️
This loving god you speak of, did it drown innocent koala bears over here in Australia?
WHAT HARM DID THEY EVER DO??
@@gknight4719No. The fallen angels and Nephilim had corrupted everything on earth, no longer God's creation. The destruction of corruption was necessary to save the earth and its inhabitants. Your Koalas would have been gigantic and evil, probably cannibalistic. Think on that, then do some reading and research.
The number of fossils recovered from the La Brea tar pits is about 3.5 million, and includes 138 vertebrate species, many now extinct. Why has has there not been a single dinosaur fossil found there?
good question
It’s only about 40,000 years old. The dinosaurs were gone 65 million years ago.
@@Jason_Hubred , Apparently one didn’t.
The tar is the Terrible Lizards
Thanks for the video! Honest question here: are there any human remains in the fossil records dating back to supposed dinosaur times?
Yes, there are, but of course Evolutionists try to discredit any evidence that doesn't agree with their religion's dogma.
I am a Creationist- I believe in a literal Adam who lived around 6000 years ago, but I am shocked by some of the use of 'evidence' here to support the co-existence of Man and Dinosaurs. There have been no human bones found with Dinosaur fossils. I live on the North Yorkshire coast (UK). There are thousands of fossils found here every year. Sometimes Ichthyosaurs and Plesiosaurs - but never with whale or seal or dolphin fossils- which would reside in a similar habitat!!! This is the normal. I have collected fossils for over 45 years and know of no one who has found the kind of anomalies that this guy is promulgation.
For the record, I do not believe in ANY kind of macro evolution.
Please state sources for any co-existence for dinosaurs and any MODERN-DAY mammals. I know of none whatsoever.
@@Jason_HubredWrong. Dating methods are different for different materials. Scientists use the method that is proven to be accurate for each case.
@bdawg-qj9none of the methods have been proven to be accurate at all and they all have assumptions in them to generate an answer based on a preconcieved expectation. They used the same method to date several different rocks formed from the Mt st helens eruption and this resulted in a wide variety of ages including one that was a negative years or from the future I guess.
@@statutesofthelord do you have a source or article name i can read?
Have you seen the fossilized penguin? When did they first appear? How old is this fossil?
Fossils of penguins have been found in New Zealand and Antarctica. PBS Eons has a great video on their fossil locations.
Really good video. 👏🏻
It's also really interesting to see in our generation that animals are coming to humans for help. They do not need to be taught this. They instinctively know to come to us. We surely are their guardians. Just like the animals went to Noah, so it shall also be in the last days.
There's a video of an Orangutan using a medicinal herb like natives would to heal a wound on its eye and people say this is evidence of evolution in progress. Orangutans are extremely smart and have been observing humans for millenia at this point. A few have even learned to spear fish this way using broken sticks. It means they are smart, that's it! Crows can use basic tools to open cage doors and reach certain things. Parrots and some other birds can mimic language. None of this is proof of evolution!
Let’s see how things go when a tiger comes at you “for help”. 🤦🏻♂️
there's literally videos of that already.. bad example to try and refute the poster.
@@BornAgain223 How often and how many? These are extremely uncommon occurrences relative to simply being attacked by tigers. The poster is suggesting all animals instinctively know to come to us for help. While I don’t dispute the fact that some have, I would expect they are relatively few outside of domesticated animals.
Utter nonsense. Animals generally try to stay well away from humans
A question that I have would be one how much land mass has been explored in the fossil records, 1%, 10% etc. and if you can calculate how many people were possibly alive at the flood judging by the twos that were created and then 1650 years later, you could come up with a figure. How many creatures would've been produced so to speak by evolution over 500 million years?
Actually, Cal Smiith could be a superb actor. He sounds so amazingly convincing, even when he's spouting such complete nonsense. Missed his vocation.
I believe the scriptures support a timeline longer than 6000 years, however it's my belief in Jesus Christ through whom I'm saved that is far more important.
😂
Then you don't follow what Jesus said about the beginning of Creation, He said in the beginning was male and female which means humans were there from the beginning. This completely destroys the whole old age Earth account. If you say the Earth is old then you are saying Jesus is a liar and wasn't sinless by nature.
If the earth was older, then how do you account for the scripture? The genealogy of Adam to king David and to Jesus.
But indeed you are right about Jesus. Because there is only one name given under heaven by which one must be saved.
Then you're calling
Jesus Christ a liar ......
@@nickroberts-xf7oq That's basically what He's saying here in the comments since I don't think he read about the part where Jesus came down to take the place of Adam's original sin.
My theory is that dinosaurs didn't have body fat therefore they sank and were covered up. Humans had body fat and floated and did not get rapidly covered. Human bodies just rotted properly also nibble on by aquatic animals. Bones would have just sank and dissolve over time. Even now human bones don't last long in water.
goddammit...
godfuckingdammit...
There's no way you're serious...
@@robertraab I don't know you , but I don't like you
A Harvard-led study indicates that Earth’s early ocean could have been one to two times larger than the current ocean volume.
These calculations are based on the interior water storage capacity of the planet, which includes the water bound to minerals in the Earth’s mantle.
Researchers compiled data from scientific literature on minerals that contain oxygen and hydrogen atoms (the chemical equivalents of water) and used these figures to estimate the mantle’s water storage capacity.
Implications:
In extreme scenarios, if the primordial ocean were two times larger than today’s ocean, it might have completely flooded the land masses on the early Earth.
While modern Earth’s surface is approximately 70 percent water-covered, this research suggests that our planet was a true ocean world billions of years ago
I suggest that when you present complicated well written sentences, as at the end, that you take the time to break them down into finite concepts, each reasoned and then brought again into the coherent more complicated statement.
Are they just going to not talk about how there were plenty of cave paintings of dinosaurs???
What are these cave paintings?
@@davidchalmers2504 The Egyptians, among many others, depicted mythical creatures in their art, none of which appear in the paleontological record. Artistic representations alone don't confirm the existence of these creatures. Just as we don’t take every mythical depiction as historical fact, we shouldn't interpret ancient art or cave drawings as evidence for dinosaurs coexisting with humans
@@HipstarMusic Hey, I’m with you. I’m a firm believer in the theory of evolution and the 65 million year gap between man and dinosaur. I was only curious as to this person’s examples.
@@davidchalmers2504 I was following up your question to the poster. I didn't mean to direct my response toward you. Sorry if it appeared that way.
@@davidchalmers2504 Well then perhaps you can explain why soft dinosaur tissue containing blood vessels, blood cells, collagen and even partial DNA has been found at dig site on five continents....if you know the secret to how such tissues can survive for 65+ million years ..especially when they have been found mere feet from the surface where solar radiation and weather has been degrading them...please contact the American Red Cross..they would be interested in such blood preservation.
they litterally found dinosaur and human footprints together in the same layers but have been covered up.
You find photos of this in mainly archaeology books and mags. Also rock art portrayal of one I have seen in one of my books.
Another thing, the Bible mentions the Leviathan, as well as a period before Adam and Eve the way I understand. What was, is, and will be according to the Bible!!!!!
Covered up? And yet you know about it. How do you suppose that happened?
@@lenawagner6405, An elephant.
This is the Paluxy River in Glen Rose, Texas. The documentary was 'Footprints In The Stone', I believe. The main fossil in question, that of a human footprint superimposed over a dinosaur track, was tragically chiselled out and lost to fossil collectors, as were many of the surrounding fossilized tracks. This loss prevents detailed analysis using modern scientific methods on the actual fossils, and limits such investigations to reviewing the old photographs and videos, which cannot be scientifically rigorous or definitive.
So the lack of mentioning this is very ethical of the speaker, and shows a scientific restraint that his enemies would not think him capable. I do believe the documentary that these footprints existed, but science requires observability and repeatability. Sadly, old photographs of fossils does not materially strengthen the case, but relying too much on them now that they're no longer available for examination does definitely weaken it.
I've got a really interesting question I'd like to have answered in an episode if possible. Right after the flood all plant material would've been washed away and killed so how did the plants manage to come back so soon after the flood that Noah was able to get a leaf/small fresh stick from his bird he sent out once the waters receded? I believe in the historical fact of Noah's flood and the ark but I saw this question get asked once and It's been something I've wanted to ask about for a while now.
@@Jason_HubredThen that’s a horrible answer. There are animals that live entirely off of trees. You’re trying to tell us that those animals starved for years waiting for trees to grow?
@@bdawg-qj9bqThose animals are speciation from an original template that most likely didn't live entirely from trees.
@@Jason_Hubred first in the story it lasted for a year. No tree will live a year under water. Trees take years to grow.
@@Jason_HubredAre you thinking of leaf eaters or fruit eaters? If leaf you have a point but most trees don't fruit for years, apples its 8 to 10 years. how do we have fruit fly's-bats ext....
All plant material would have been washed away and killed!!!!!!
You obviously haven't weeded a garden. If you had you know of the pain in the ar$e of having to do it again and again and again and again.
I saw the caption and I couldn't bring myself to watch because the evolutionists will NEVER be right.
I keep hearing the narrator say "the coelacanth's lung." The coelacanth is a fish. It has no lungs
Yeah he's really nit that bright so probably doesn't get that
The narrator is referring to a "fatty lung" or a fat-filled single-lobed vestigial lung, homologous to other fishes' swim bladders.
@@shazamshazamski I may have missed it but could you reply with the timestamp of when he talks about what he is defining as a “lung?”
Lots of fish have air sac bladders (lungs?).
@@mach1553 yes, fish have swim bladders which are filled with air but these are not “lungs.” The narrator has to be very careful with his terminology because it can either confuse the audience or make himself appear unknowledgeable.
100s of Millions of years?🤣 That alone sounds so goofy😂😂😂
@@kennykunkel943 It's called evidence, none for creation, tonnes for evolution and "old" earth.
@@kennykunkel943 excellent !
@@bobwilkinson2008 So you believe that nothing created everything ? wheres the science in that ?
I believe the Gospel of John , That Jesus is Ho theos , the Creator of everything
I believe God Loves you and me and he has has given us his Son Jesus to be our Redeemer and Savior if we will put our complete trust in him . I've trusted Jesus , He has saved my soul.
I have come to understand that I am a sinner . Jesus is my Savior . Jesus loves you Bob , trust him and be saved from what is coming , Jesus is the only way
@@jwsanders1214 Who said nothing created everything? No one. But, you're saying some magical sky fairy did it all, even though there's no evidence of that but there is mountains of evidence of how we evolved and are also beginning to see how life first started.
@@bobwilkinson2008 In the Beginning there was Nothing , then it exploded !
Creation can't be replicated . Everything is taken by Faith . You have chosen to believe that this marvelous universe we find ourselves in came about by random chance , all the wonders like the eye , ear , animals , oceans , Humming Birds , atmosphere , The wonder of Male and Female , conception and birth are the product of unlimited Time and Chance .
I don't have enough Faith to be an atheist. I Trust Jesus
I have come to understand that God loves you and me and he has made it so easy for us to make it to Heaven and bypass Hell . Simply Trust Jesus and accept the free gift of Salvation that he offers you . It costs you nothing , He has purchaced it for you with his Blood
When creation fell in the Garden and sin & death entered the world, everything started dying and extinction of species started.
It’s very likely that all dinosaur species were already extinct by the time of the Flood.
This might be a silly question…Why aren’t all the human remains of the people who were destroyed in the flood in the fossil record too?
We have in texas at the Palauxy river by Glen Rose texas, the evolutionists try to hide this place.
Care to elaborate?
@@user-so8hc7ry3k The London Artifact was found near London, Texas in Kimble County. The site is part of a large geographical zone called the Edwards Plateau. It primarily consists of Cretaceous rock. In June of 1934, Max Hahn discovered a rock, sitting loose on a rock ledge beside a waterfall outside London, Texas. Noticing that this weathered rock had wood protruding from it, he and family members cracked it open with a hammer and chisel, exposing the hammerhead to the light of day for the first time since the stone formed around it. To verify that the hammer was made of metal, they cut into one of the beveled sides with a file. In the resulting nick, bright, shiny iron was exposed. The bright metal in the nick is still there, with no detectable corrosion. The metal hammerhead is approximately six inches (15.24cm) long with a nominal diameter of one inch. This seems somewhat small for a gross pounding instrument, suggesting that this tool was meant for fine work or soft metal.
The density of the iron in a central, cross-sectional plane is shown in Photo K16. It shows the interior metal to be very pure, with no bubbles. Modern industry cannot consistently produce iron castings with this quality, as evidenced by test results that show bubbles and density variations that have caused pump and valve bodies to break. The handle eye is oval shaped, and roughly 1"x1/2".
Photo K16 shows that the density is about 10% greater near the surface. In this representation, colors are used to indicate the density of a particular region. The white areas are most dense, and the dark areas are least dense.
As previously stated, a file cut was made in one of the side edges in 1934, and has remained corrosion-free in the sixty-plus years since the artifact was discovered. The area is shown in photo G3.

The wooden handle appears to have been broken off, then worn smooth where it protruded from the rock concretion. Photo G6 shows the handle from the top with the hammerhead removed. The dark area in the wood is where it has partially turned to coal. The end of the handle visible through the top of the hammerhead eye appears sawn off, as shown in photo E2.
Remaining Questions:
Further analysis is planned to answer questions that include the following: Is the chlorine content in the iron alloy found throughout the hammerhead or only at the surface? Is the concentration of iron oxides higher in the rock immediately next to the hammerhead? Are there carbon-bearing residues in the cavity? There are reports that the file mark may contain FeO. This iron oxide does not readily form under present environmental conditions. We also know that evidence points to a decaying geomagnetic field, with a half-life of approximately 1400 years. If the hammer is truly ancient, could the stronger magnetic field have had the effect of helping the formation of FeO? If the artifact is truly from the Cretaceous time frame, where does this leave evolutionary theory, since man was not supposed to have evolved for another 100-million years or so? If the artifact is relatively recent, that means that the Cretaceous Hensell Sand formation from which it came is relatively young. Some may argue that the original rock and fossil were eroded and reworked, but reworked fossils show evidence of wear. The fossils in the concretion retain fine detail, indicating that they were not reworked, but part of the original formation. Again, where does that leave evolutionary theory with its traditional dates for the Cretaceous formations?
ABOUT THE MUSEUM
The Creation Evidence Museum
of Texas is a 501(c)3 non-profit
educational museum chartered
in Texas for the purpose
of researching and displaying
scientific evidence for creation.
VISITOR INFO.
How exactly do they do that?
@mattbrook-lee7732 how you ask?
That area is one of the most rich environments for fossils and, more specifically, dinosaur fossils, yet it is rarely used by the big collage for research. As a matter of fact, a professor from a prestigious Ivy school flew there and started destroying the footprints with a large metal bar , the one he specifically destroyed completely was a dinosaur print with a human print step inside of it ...
@murph19611 it was researched to death in the 1980s. Much of it by creationists looking for evidence. They stopped looking because they realised what they were finding was falsifying their claim. Since then creationists never go and investigate the actual tracks, preferring to just let the myth run on.
I haven't heard the story of the man destroying the print. But one guy with an iron bar doesn't add up to the conspiracy you are describing.
If the evidence is there, then it is for creationists to go and find it. The lack of activity you are describing says it all
When I went to the zoo, why couldn’t I see chimps and lions in the same cage, they come from the same country?
Which country are you referring too?
@@Dualbladedscorpion7737 sorry, I don’t think you are understanding my comment quite how I intended.
Read it with the video title and a British sense of sarcasm in mind.
@@jamesmaybury7452 i got it. it was a nice joke.
maybury, so you agree that chimps and lions came into existence due to an intelligent being creating them?
no real geologist/paleontologist thinks that modern mammals like beavers/ducks were found in the fossil records of dinosaurs. There may be some unusual shifted layers of sediments from earthquakes or similar but this would be explainable. Also there is plenty of interpretation room on genesis 2 for a creation of older earth eras.
There’s so much mental gymnastics going on here.
A nice outline before the documentary story would be helpful ☝
Mental gymnastics only happens here huh? … please
@scorpionnemo what? Who said that? Just bc this guy reaches for crazy conclusions based on nothing, doesn't mean there aren't mental gymnastics going on elsewhere. Do you think that the world has a quota of 1 person at a time reaching for ridiculous conclusions?
the earth is old and dinosaurs were already dead and gone before humans came a long that's why their not in the same strata old earth creation is the correct view.
@@diamondlife-gi7hg yep
Creationists think that humans hunted dinosaurs to extinction. So even more so we should find humans and dinosaurs together as humans would have used dinosaur remains for shelter, clothing, and other uses.
I’ve never come across a creationist who believed that humans hunted dinosaurs.
Dinosaurs and humans lived millions of years apart from each other. What creationist did you ever talk with that believes that nonsense? It is basic knowledge that's being taught in primary school (at least where I live).
@@wiskyjack_7143 There are all manner of stories of men hunting dragons...being the corollary.
It's even stranger then that, they believe God fought a plesiosaur, killed it with a sword then feed the world with its skull. Isaiah 27:1 In that day the Lord with his hard and great and strong sword will punish Leviathan the fleeing serpent, Leviathan the twisting serpent, and he will slay the dragon that is in the sea. Psalm 74:14 You crushed the heads of Leviathan; you gave him as food for the creatures of the wilderness.
@MichaelWilliams-eq4kt So Jesus fought a plesiosaur? Not only that he made a promise to fight a plesiosaur in Genesis 3? What did the plesiosaur do to get Jesus that mad?
Perhaps the dinosaurs were wiped out in the 1st flood, not the flood of Noah (the 2nd flood). Read 2nd Peter 3:5&6
There was a civilization before Adam & Eve, read Jeremiah 4 & Ezekiel 28
I get the impression that world climate pre flood was vastly different to the post flood climate.
I've heard it said that some dinosaurs were "kind of" warm blooded, but most not.
The large mammals have a nominally 4 year reproductive cycle, I've not heard any opinion on dinosaur reproductive cycle.
So my thought is, "perhaps the dramatic climate change became unsuitable for the dinosaurs and reproduction rates became unsustainable".
If Noah’s flood happened right now you would find me buried with my dog, man’s best friend. I really don’t think we were keeping dinosaurs as pets so we naturally wouldn’t be found with them
He want you to think that the Flintstones was a true documentary.
The flood took place 4300 years ago on the bible timeline. The Egyptians have over 5000 years of recorded history. The aboriginal Australians have over 50,000 years on their island.
I wonder if the fountains of the deep opening would be the water scientists found under the oceans?
Do you know why people laughed at Noah for building an Ark? There was no rain on the earth then there was a mist.
@douglaspaxson it would have took 3x the amount of water on the entire earth to cover the tallest mountain. The answer tobyour question is NO
@@douglaspaxson Noah's flood story is mythology. It never happened.
I believe the Word of God. I reject evolution.
Which god? Zeus? Odin? Osiris? Shiva? Quetzalcoatl?
@@wottermelon4060 The True God.
@@wottermelon4060you guys always say this despite knowing exactly what we mean it’s just funny at this point.
@@halodude4481 You know what's funny? A grown up actually thinking people and dinosaurs coexisted when they are in fact separated by about 65 million years. That's funny.
@@halodude4481its a serious question, humans for thousands of years have been creating gods. Living and dying FOR those gods, while claiming that they are the TRUE gods.
You CANNOT all be right..
But you CAN all be wrong. 😂
This is fascinating information. I really appreciate it. I am curious about something, though. The Bible says that God told Noah to use Gopher Wood to build the Ark. What would have happened to the rest of the Gopher Trees that were left over after the Ark was completed? Did they become part of the fossil fuels used today? Are there any tree fossils that could match the wood sample that the late Ron Wyatt brought back from Noah's Ark during his trips to the Middle East?
is a cealicant a lungfish?
well, birds exist, don't they? so we literally are hanging out with dinosaurs
Well, they also existed during the dinosaur age which makes one think🤔
Lol when was the last time you saw a bird eat a goat? Or even have teeth like a dinosaur?
@@nathanhale7444 actually the other day I saw an eagle eating a large mammal - I think it was deer. However, me eating a deer and the eagle eating a deer doesn't make either one of a dinosaur. Birds have hollow bones and dinosaurs do not.
@@PeaceIntheValley I seriously doubt it killed the deer and eagles don't have teeth
@@nathanhale7444 when did the definition of dinosaur include the ability to eat a goat? That would exclude most known dinosaurs
humans and non avian dinosaurs lived millions of years apart that's why
The science says different.
@@francismarion6400 ever heard of earth layers?
@@francismarion6400 Science says differently.
Here, I corrected the grammar for you. Only 2 mistakes in that sentence, well done! But you have to correct the content mistakes on your own. You can do it :)
A question to those who still believe in Noah´s flood. If all surviving animals were together on the arc and left it at the same time and place, why do you find certain species in geographical different regions? Why don´t you find f.e. elefants in Australia or sloths in Africa?
God was incontroll then as now. Not for us to know don5 matter doesn't change my faith. Praise jesus!!!
clickbait title. we dont even find entire dinosaur skeletons.
yes we do I was eating one dinosaur yesterday and threw out a whole skeleton. Birds are dinosaurs.
If birds are dinosaurs, and people are birds, then dinosaurs are people, and we should therefore allow them to immigrate into our communities 🤦♂️
@@tnutz777 What exactly do you think a dinosaur is? And no people are not birds people are apes, they are both Amniotes.
@@FilipCordasNope, that is a very poor theory and it's not even close to fact!
@@shannaconda3434 it's not a theory it's classification birds are a subcategory of dinosaurs that's by definition. And it's impossible to classify all dinosaurs without birds using morphology geneticists or any other clarification system. Go ahead and try give me a definition of a dinosaur that won't include birds? And you can't cheat and use 'except birds'
The reason we do not find non-avian dinosaurs and human fossils together is they are seperated by over 65 million years.
If rocks formed in the crater at Mt Saint Helens were 10 years old, yet radio-isotope dating placed them at 1.5 million years….how can you be so certain about this 65 million year idea?
If the dinosaurs lived 65 million years ago, how is it that T-Rex bones have been found with soft tissue inside?
@@paulsimmonds2030 Microscopic traces of collegen dried out and encased in rock is not "soft tissue".
@@walkergaryaThe people that actually found them stated that they were soft tissue! Nice try! Read more!
@@shannaconda3434 Dr Mary Schwitzer who made this discovery, bathed the fossil matterial in acid then irrigated the microscopic traces in water. The material is collegen, not terribly soft and she has no doubt about the age of that fossil being about 68 million years old. You can quibble all you want about "soft", but it will get you nowhere.
I have stood in shallow water in the Paluxy and Blanco Rivers in Texas and looked at human and dinasaur footprints side by side imbedded in the limestone river bottom.
They are not human foot prints.
Very funny video, and a lot of hilarious comments from believers too 😂😂😂
Tell me you know nothing about science without telling me you know nothing about science.
Dazzle us with all of your true evidence based science that has 0 assumptions. Please! Tell us the truth oh mighty deliverer of all scientific knowledge!
@@shannaconda3434 300 BCE, that’s before the current era, 300 yrs before the invention of the buybull. Zeus sent Prometheus and epimetheus (forethought and afterthought-remember Jesus was alpha and the omega-beginning and the end) to earth to create all life and to give each creature its own special gift (there are gifts of the Holy Spirit). After creating all life, zeus didn’t like that epimetheus was alone, so on earth he created a garden and from it woman. He named her pandora, gave her a wedding present of a box and the gift of curiosity. Zeus gave pandora specific instructions not to open the box (Satan used eves curiosity to get her to eat the apple) but since she had the gift of curiosity, she opened the box and all of man’s woes entered the world.
That was believed as fact 300 yrs before the invention of what you believe now, 2300 yrs later. So if you believe a god created us out of a garden, I guess you shouldn’t say anything about that story either, since they’re the same.
Don’t even get me started on the flood story, which is only a story to remember the leap yr.
The reason is humans and non-avian dinosaurs lived 66 million years apart.
Where are 66 million years worth of fossils?
And why are they discovering soft tissue in dinosaur bones...?
Pfeh. In my day it was 65 million years ago.
In all seriousness, I used to believe the millions of years number. Too many museum trips with displays talking about how all of a sudden floods created whatever fossil display I was looking at convinced me otherwise. Not creationist arguments but museum displays set up by people believing in evolution.
@@tedc4982 We have that, but don't you understand that 99.9% of every organism to have lived died without being fossilized, because fossilization takes very specific conditions, but we still have a huge fossil record despite that..
@@tedc4982 what exactly do you think soft tissue in dinosaur bones proves?
@@williamcozart8158 the method to "date" and give years had problems around 19 and 20 centuries, as physics had estipulations of years of universe Very different to earth's ...and consequently of fossils.
Why the consensus changed many times then? The method used in the First time to understand the age of fossil wasnt the same as today and late XX century. Why i should give crédit?
I questioned myself, after hearing of such "conditions" to fossils to come, and that are indeed very casual and specific, with long run time of deposition of soil.
But If some species that exists are encountered fossilized at same years or with "millions" of years, that wouldnt question evolution itself? If such thing happens, IS there explanation to see "fixed" species that doesnt evolved after millions of years? If that's so, people would question the Nature of the experiments done to give "years" to earth soil, those ARE questionable differently from the technology used to determine age of universe.
Again if only you guys would actually read the article your quoting. Im not even 7 minutes into the video.
One of the biggest mysteries surrounding the fossilized lung is where the rest of the coelacanth's massive body ended up. Martill's leading theory is that one of the large reptilian marine predators that dominated the Cretaceous oceans - such as plesiosaurs and mosasaurs - may have eaten it
"Coelacanths were slow-swimming fishes; this massive version would have been easy prey for these big predators," Martill said.
The researchers also found damage on the lung, which also suggests the fish was bitten by one of these massive predators.
A diagram showing where the lung fragment would have been located within the coelacanth's body.
Plesiosaurs and mosasaurs would have also regurgitated up large bones from their meals, like modern-day lizards do, which could explain why the lung ended up isolated with other bones from different animals. It would also explain why other coelacanths haven't been found in the area, as the fish may have been eaten hundreds of miles away and then regurgitated much later.
Like the Elephants Child being the story of how the Elephant got it's trunk......
This video is a joke
And it is not even funny. It fails on every level.
These fishes are now deep sea fishes and therefore we don’t find them in the fossil record after 65 million years ago. They are also very rare today as opposed to millions of years ago.
In Glen Rose, Texas, at the Paluxy River , are dinosaur footprints along side of human footprints!
How an acuatic animal (marine reptile like mosasaurus, icthyosaurus...etc in this case) could die in an flood and not the whales, fish, sharks, etc that we have today??
Good question. Presumably many of them did. Don't forget the coelacanth mentioned in the video was thought to be long extinct until recently, as were giant squids. It is generally believed in creationist circles that after the Deluge there was an ice age. Marine reptiles have less chance of surviving this kind of new environment than mammals do, so the whales did better under the circumstances, even though both reptiles and whales breathe air. As for the fish and sharks, well, they are all water-breathers and diving deep can get you out of the way of tsunamis and storms at the surface while heading up gets you away from undersea landslides. It is possible that that zone in the middle was relatively safe. Plus which we don't know how violent the Deluge actually was.
@@jefferygoldthorpe919 Good Answer
@@jefferygoldthorpe919 That´s a good answer thank you but still has some gaps that are difficult to ignore if you want to give an explanation that actually makes sense for the non-specific audience and imagine for a specific audience with knowledge in biology, geology, etc...
It was a local flood , not a world flood . Noah would only brought his livestock into the ark . If you think about 2 by 2 , would lead to extinction of many species . Interbreeding also . So much of the story is not true .
Explain saltwater fish coexisting with freshwater fish at the time of the flood?? Was the flood water 50% saltwater and 50% freshwater? How did these different groups (freshwater-saltwater) of fish survive the global flood?
Saltwater is heavier than Fresh water so there could have been pockets of less salty water thats my guess , but one thing I know , Jesus is my Savior
Another question is, if evolution is true, why have transitional fossils not been found that dinosaurs evolved from?
They have. Dinosaurs evolved from a group of animals called archosaurs which arose after the Permian extinction 252 MYA. Besides giving rise to the dinosaurs the archosaurs are also the direct relatives of the pterosaurs and the crocodilians.
@@sciencerules2825 Thanks for the response. Archosaurs are not shown to be continuously changing into other dinosaurs. They are simply another branch of dinosaur which is why they have found them buried together in some locations. The missing links are called missing links because they are just that… Missing.
@@ministryofthefeet8169 _Archosaurs are not shown to be continuously changing into other dinosaurs._ Actually yes they have. See _Mambachiton fiandohana_ and _Teleocrater rhadinus._
@@sciencerules2825 Yes I have seen those and they are just a small 4-6 foot dinosaur. So you believe those little ones somehow evolved into the larger ones? That would require a tremendous amount of new information in the DNA. We have never observed an addition to information, only a loss of information as seen in adaptation and mutation. Adaptation or micro evolution is the only evolution that has been observed. Macro evolution requires faith because it has never been observed :)
@@ministryofthefeet8169 Oh please, not the tired old "mutations only lose info" canard.
One of the most common methods evolution adds new genetic information is through gene duplication followed by additional mutations to the copy. The original gene still performs the original function while the copy is free to mutate and explore new functionality. This is so well known and documented there are entire college textbooks on the subject.
Start with a genetic sequence
AACAGT
Duplicate it
AACAGTAACAGT
Additional mutations to the copy
AACAGTAACATT
Original sequence = AACAGT
New sequence = AACAGTAACATT
The new sequence is *new genetic information* by anyone's definition. Just in case you think I'm making it up, here is a 2020 paper documenting real world empirically observed examples
*Evolution of new enzymes by gene duplication and divergence*
You don't find Sabre tooth tiger bones with mammoth bones. Why? They don't travel together
I thought that human and dinosaur fossils had been found together in the Ashley phosphate beds.
Knowing that people did NOT want to spread out all over the world like God commanded to "fill the earth," we should only expect human fossils in the areas around the Genesis rivers and surrounding areas.
lol you really twist stuff here. Found in the same fossil layer does not mean found together. But proves not around at the same time.