Get the full picture on every story by subscribing through my link ground.news/alexanderavila to get 40% off unlimited access with the Vantage Subscription or get started with the Pro-Plan for less than $1/month.
You're alright, but your weird autism self-diagnosis video was all over the place. Although I think it's just struck me that the entire 'lying about autism on the internet' thing is a kink thing, right? It's so that you can r@pe each other and feel somewhat like it's legal. And once you're in that community, you'll likely never get out, just because of the taboo nature of what you guys do to each other, it's ingenious really. You guys are just common or garden preverts, very cool
@@jarrellfamily1422 What are you on about? The correct terminology is DSDs, Disorder o Sexual Development, not the misleading and outdated "intersex" label. Every single person with a DSD, is either male or female. Most of the conditions are even fully sex-specific, never affecting the other sex. There is nothing hard to comprehend about DSDs in terms of what sex a person is.
In biology it’s not a saying, but it’s widely known that all systems of classification are wrong. There are always exceptions. We’re all just trying to make sense of things lol
@@melitrophium well there is a saying “the standard biologist’s answer is I know it when I see it” which is to say, we don’t know and we are scrambling to find places to draw lines, as though evolution did not long prove that there is no such thing as a species, and viruses did not long prove there is no such thing as life.
@@julzbehr6696 real 🙏 on that note, if anyone is interested in reading more takes on how these flimsy boundaries relate to queerness and relationships, I loved "Virology: essays for the living, the dead, and the small things in between" by Joseph Osmundson
For whatever it's worth, I'm a biologist (specifically a botanist and a quantitative ecologist) and we also use that phrase too. It may be more common for those of us who work more with statistical models of complex systems, like population biologists and ecologists.
As an intersex person, thank you for touching on the hypocrisy of the medical community for banning trans healthcare access for youths while simultaneously forcing intersex youths into hrt and other treatments that they DON'T want because upholding the binary is more important than their agency and comfort. They need to seriously pick a lane.
Their lane is conformity to their version of their religion. What science they use, abuse or ignore has everything to do with their belief they have a right to express power by whaever means. They consider their hypocrisy merely a show of dominance accordingly.
Yes, people with disorders of sexual development have historically insisted on bodily integrity, and as such have no truck with trans activism, which is all about chemical/surgical intervention.
@@umamicashflow1809 I don't need you explaining what I already know back to me with a anti-trans edge, man. Especially after using the term "disorders of sex development". Go find some anti-woke clowns to watch or some shit.
@@umamicashflow1809 I don't know how you got any of those ideas or that it's 'disordered' to be intersex, per se in the first place. And actually there's plenty of *overlap* with the trans community sine many *do* need surgical /'chemical' treatments to feel right, they just don't want doctors arbitrarily trying to alter ambiguous infants or kids to conform to the anatomical binary *before they even have a say in it.* Notably cause the last figures I saw on it said that doctors somehow have a worse track record of picking 'right' for intersex kids' gender identities than if they'd just tossed a coin. A lot of chromosomal intersex conditions people might walk around all their lives and never even know it, but quite a few go through the same experiences as trans people, who are arguably just another form or degree of intersex anyway.
I liked the video and I wish it had come out in time to cite it in mine lol! The horse analogy is really useful. There’s a crucial timeline error in the discussion of the Cass Review though: the NHS actually stopped prescribing puberty blockers to trans children in 2021 - not 2024 - in response to Bell v Tavistock, not the Cass Review, and even when Bell v Tavistock was later overturned in the Court of Appeal they didn't resume prescribing. This is important because it shows us a key way these systems operate: they make the decision first (in this case deciding to refuse treatment to trans patients) and *then* create the document that they point to as justification. The Cass Review not only excluded trans people from its governance board, as you rightly pointed out, but also several members of its advisory board are pro-conversion therapy activists, which was kept secret until *after* the report was published. Some have directly lobbied the British government to prevent a ban on conversion therapy. I think it does the Review far too much credit to get into the weeds of how it conducts evidence reviews; it gives NHS England the benefit of the doubt when the truth is, in my opinion, blunter - NHS England have been told since at least 2013 that the segregated system they are running is bad for patients. They have been condemned in joint statements by international medical authorities multiple times, and even by their own clinicians. Several patients have died on the waiting list. The Cass Review is, in my opinion, an attempt to continue ignoring the negative outcomes they’ve caused and protect the careers of the managers responsible for those deaths.
Hi Abigail, thanks for contextualizing this further. I’ll admit that the British Medical System is not my expertise. I appreciate you highlighting the earlier history of this policy decision that goes back to the Bell v. Tavistock decision. It’s important to note that these policy decisions are not clean reactions to medical research, but politically motivated systemic actions that problematize trans life. Ultimately, the intention of this video was not to be the ultimate Cass Review/NHS “takedown,” so I had to make some decisions on where I spent my energy, leading to some oversights and omissions. Had it been my intention to take on Cass or the NHS or British transphobia, I would’ve spent a lot more time outlining all the nefarious connections different journalists have pointed out. You could write an entire video in and of itself that ties together the different suspicious knots in the Cass Review. I assume you’re referring to Trilby Langton and her connections to “Exploratory Therapy.” I think it’s certainly worth the time to show the anti-trans bias surrounding the review. But since this video wasn’t supposed to be a Cass Review takedown video, I didn’t want to make strong claims that couldn’t be quickly, cleanly, and firmly demonstrated. Rather, I wanted the main focus of this video to be about the frameworks we use to talk about gender. Because even if we lived in a cute fantasy world where The Cass Review was a genuine good-faith effort to “review the evidence,” the whole way of thinking of trans experience as a medicalized disorder is fundamentally flawed. The way I see it, regardless of whether or not you include trans people or surround yourself with sketchy transphobic connections, the search for evidence in favor of gender-affirming care is always going to be fraught as long as (trans)gender identity is pathologized. Underlying the Cass Review is the assumption that a trans life is an undesirable life, a uniquely disordered life, and/or a life to be avoided at all costs. I think this is the larger question that is the heart of the issue. P.S. Your video on Judith Butler was great!
@@alexander_avila No one can be "born in the wrong body", our brains ARE our body just as much as any other part of it. We are the sex we are, regardless of what our personal relationship is with the sexist stereotypes in society. "Trans" ideology, is regressive and sexist, as there is no "correct way" of being a boy or girl, man or woman, all those terms do is indicate sex and stage of maturity - decoupling sex and gender and trying to make gender into this ludicrous concoction of personality and sexist stereotypes is beyond regressive - it actively harms people who buy into it - the idea that there is something wrong with a kid's body that needs to be chemically altered because they believe living up to sexist stereotypes is some real measure of whether they are a boy or a girl (and man or woman for adults obviously), is insanity. I have asked hundreds of "activists" and "allies" to explain what they are measuring themselves against to determine that they have a need to transition - NOT ONE person has been able to articulate what that is - not one person is able to distance themselves sufficiently to realise that THEY are the ones with a regressively sexist idea of what it means to be a boy/girl or man/woman and that that is the issue causing all the problems - their own misunderstanding and severely limited perspective/sexist misunderstanding of what sexist stereotypes/"gender norms" actually entail - they are not rules, they are not real boundaries, they are regressive ideas and generalisations - no one needs to live up to any such utter nonsense or feel comfortable with those stereotypes to be a boy/girl/man/woman - all those terms represent, and all they should represent, is sex and stage of maturity - by creating this whole "gender identity" nonsense, THAT IS WHAT CAUSES ALL THE DISTRESS, THIS FABRICATION OF A FRAMEWORK WHICH DISTORTS REALITY. No one - NO ONE - in the movement has been able to explain or articulate what this supposed "womanly essence" or "manly essence" is that they feel/know/need to transition in order to represent etc. actually is - yet you all actively believe in it and push for it to be accepted. That is ludicrous.
@@ambientjohnny Why all the spam under every person's comment? Couldn't you just make your points once? This isn't the only channel I've seen you do this on. Also, you clearly didn't watch the video.
@@durnsidh6483 Because I'm interested in changing people's minds. The comments I reply to, those users would never see what I say otherwise. The comment certainly isn't tailored to this video. Seeing as this is under a PhilosophyTube comment, the channel owner doesn't seem to have the slightest problem with PT going around lying about having changed their sex (he's still male despite lying about being female on Novara Media).
@@ambientjohnny Well may I suggest you take a rhetoric course because people here don't see you as worth engaging with, they see you as an asshole. The fact that you're alleging that Abigail "lied about [her] sex change" again indicates you haven't watched the video.
12:43 hit the nail on the head. I was a cis kid who was on a puberty blocker in the early 2000s for adrenal hyperplasia. There was zero controversy surrounding them then, and even still when I defend trans kids being allowed to use them, transphobes counter with the “you had a medically legitimate reason”. I did indeed have a medically legitimate reason, as do trans kids. My parents and I did not want me going through puberty at 6 years old. Had I been a girl (I’m a cis guy) they would’ve _especially_ not wanted me to go through male puberty as a 6 year old girl. It would’ve been psychologically traumatizing. Yet anti-trans ideologues force trans kids to endure it.
But the actual difference would be that PBs were being used to block an early puberty for you (if i understand correctly) but would be blocking a "natural" puberty for trans kids, and we dont know the effects of that. No?
@@Super-BallSharp We know it blocks the undesired puberty, which can cause actual, real, measurable trauma in trans people. The brain is very much a part of the body that deserves attention and care, same as any other organ. Mental health care is genuine and real health care, the same as any other
@@Super-BallSharpSo you would support the banning of puberty blockers for all cis kids too, surely? Since we don’t have strong evidence, such as randomized double blind studies, demonstrating the long term effects. i.e. for the same reason trans kids are now being denied the medication. Or should we draw a distinction between “natural” and “unnatural” puberty?By age, by cis or trans, by motivation. Whatever it is, if you agree with the Cass report findings, you’ll need strong evidence to support your position to prescribe or not.
@@Super-BallSharp Where does your criteria for "natural" puberty end? Some people might say that someone with adrenal hyperplasia going through puberty at a young age is "natural." Their body "naturally" began developing secondary sex characteristics, without the use of any medical intervention in the first place. Perhaps going on puberty blockers was just as "unnatural" because it put a pause on what their body originally did. Yet most people do not see it this way. They believe the positives of putting cisgender kids with precocious puberty (such as improved mental health due to the ability to fit in, and more time to just be a kid for longer) outweigh the negatives. There are actually multiple long-term studies of transgender children who had been on puberty blockers showing that it greatly improved their mental health in the same way. Yet these are disregarded as "inefficient" and "biased" while research papers created by people with histories of anti-trans opinions are allowed to be used because they're totally unbiased, right? (Heavy sarcasm there). The real problem is that puberty is a ticking clock, and if we keep trying to hold off on puberty blockers for trans kids based on apprehension directly related to their identity (which we do not do for cisgender kids with precocious puberty), the children who really need that care are forced to go through the torment of a puberty they never wanted- usually causing higher rates of gender surgeries like mastectomies in the future to reverse these changes anyway. I urge you to think more critically about what is so different about using puberty blockers for trans kids and puberty blockers for cis kids, and why it matters. Sincerely, a transgender man who also has adrenal hyperplasia. :)
Dora richter (the first trans woman to receive gender reassignment surgery) is a really good example of trans kids existing whether you like it or not. Born in 1892, at the age of 6 she reportedly tried to remove her penis to look like a girl. Decades later, she continued to identify as a woman. She was treated by Magnus Hirschfeld, and worked in his institute- Hirschfeld gave her the nickname of ‘Dörchen’. It was believed that she had died in a raid of the institute in 1933 by Hitler youth, but she survived, and the last we know of her was a census in 1939. However, she lived and worked as usual for over 8 years after having THE FIRST vaginoplasty, which is- mad. So cool. Science. Wow.
Also best example for why, if not controlled and mitigated, it's a self-harming medical disorder that exists apart from social gender as invented by ideological progressives. It's a biology-driven dysphoria, not a social one. And of course, medical exceptions validate the normative.
For those who don't know, there has been some recent research and we now know slightly more about the end of her life. The census mentioned showed her living in her hometown after she was granted a legal name change in Bohemia, but it turns out she moved to Allersberg in Bavaria after ethnic Germans were expulsed from Czechoslovakia. She lived there until her death in 1966, 35 years after her vaginoplasty, at the age of 74. Hopefully we'll learn even more soon, as the researcher mentioned that they learned more but I don't know when that will be published.
Mentioning Magnus Herschfeld in the same paragraph as transgenderism…That’s going to be a yikes from me. Bigots love making this connection. It’s like mentioning Barbara Spectre or Noel Ignatiev.
"Not only transgender people have gender problems." SAY IT LOUDER FOR THE PEOPLE IN THE BACK. Like seriously. This is so true. As a cis gender woman with PCOS I'm constantly struggling with the fact that I grow facial hair, and am just... really hairy overall. It makes me feel SO uncomfortable with my own body, and myself. This experience has always made me feel like I could relate to transgender people and what it's like to have gender dysphoria, even though I actually identify with the gender I was assigned at birth.
The female lead from Easy A even said that when she was acting on set (in the plot her character disguises herself as her twin brother and cuts her hair, etc.) being referred to with he/him pronouns in the script gave her gender dysphoria
this is a perfect example of how gender dysphoria is not a trans exclusive experience, in fact most people experience this to varying degrees. We all have our ideal gender for ourselves whether born into it or not. The more people can realise this the more we can understand that harming trans healthcare isnt going to hurt just trans people, but everyone in the long run.
As a transwoman I don't understand why we say that gender dysphoria is only for trans people, I think all insecurities that are linked to gender are gender dysphoria, and that's also why I think gender dysphoria shouldn't be considered a mental illness, most people probably experience gender dysphoria, trans people just happen to not have the "right" gender dysphoria.
@Gladissims Is it gender dysphoria if I feel uncomfortable about having a very big chest instead of having a flat chest? (I'm a cis woman, but I greatly envy women who have a naturally flat chest.)
Fun fact: whoever wrote the bible did not say that Eve was created from Adams rib! The hebrew word that is used there means side and is never translated as rib anywhere else. God cut Adam in half to create Adam and Eve, just like in the Ancient Greek spherical people story. The Greek translators are at fault.
That helps explain the "dual creation" interpretation in some schools of religious thought, primarily in the Khabbalah school where they interpret the repeating of the creation of man as referring to two, possibly three women created in the garden in total, the last one being the one that's known as Eve. The first woman is identified as Lilith, and her crime was being of the same original unitary as Adam (like the Greek concept of the unitary primordial people who were all-sexed/bi-sexed) and thus equal, which wasn't acceptable to Adam.
found a hermeneutics stack exchange question saying otherwise but don't know any Hebrew and thus cannot verify - have a look for yourself though? title is: is the translation rib for the Hebrew in Genesis 2:22 justified?
Hell, they even go in reverse. A friend of mine in school had a disorder that kept him from entering puberty. We were the same age, but he looked like he was half my age. He took hormones or some sort of medication which jump started his puberty. No controversy about that whatsoever.
@@albertfralinger2711 The scenario is the inability to go through the puberty that is congruous for the child/being forced to go through incongruous puberty. If he was transfem, he likely wouldn't be as emotionally affected by delayed puberty, as it would be less incongruous than masculising puberty. If it was socially acceptable, then peer bullying wouldn't be an issue either.
@@albertfralinger2711 The thing about puberty disorders is that they're mostly just disorders because society doesn't really like to deal with them. In cases like this, it's less "get treated because your life is objectively terrible" and more "get treated so that truancy officers don't go hauling you off to the nearest middle school while you're in your 20's" and "get treated because you can't stand being so short anymore"
@@albertfralinger2711 counterpoint-anecdote, I identify now in my adult years as nonbinary and am currently on HRT, this is something I had felt strongly about but couldn't articulate to my parents (who I am very lucky to say would have been totally accepting) due to lack of vocabulary and resources in the 2000s since I was like, 8 years old. Incidentally, I developed a rare and deadly form of cancer around 13-14 that has been linked to rapid early bone development. Puberty blockers may have saved me from near-death and an extremely anguishing and depressing time going through my teenage years trying to cope with the trauma that chemotherapy left me with. In hindsight, at least, obviously dealing with neither would be the ideal reality, but I would have taken being bullied over being scrawny if it had saved me the hell that is cancer.
Gender fluidity is as much an imaginary deal as your absolute masculinité and absolute féminité. Funny how this so called Woke generation is as much cornered itself into a mental dogmatic box as the previous générations. How one generation destroyed years of hard gained progress, it's uncanny.
I used to work in teen group homes and some of the girls had hormonal birth control implants that they only kind of had a say in getting, and would get a ton of push back if they wanted them removed.
Oh, don't worry, the same bigots who are transphobic are also pro-life (more accurately 'forced birth') and are already looking to abolish no-fault-divorce (their preferred vision being no divorce possible at all) and they'll also eventually advocate against birth control, if their shitty demands keep being codified into law. They certainly don't want schools to educate comprehensively about birth control.
i mean i’m obviously not against puberty blockers, but i have never seen doctors have “very few questions” about birth control as teenagers?? like it’s definitely not as tightly regulated as puberty blockers, but someone close to me wasn’t given birth control (for pcos) until there was the literal threat of cancer if it continued in the future. yes, of course, they were more open in the sense that cancer wasn’t an immediate or direct possibility, it was only if this person had no periods for many many many years (rather than 4-5 months), but for over two years the doctors tried whatever was possible to not prescribe hormonal medication (primarily the whole “just lose weight” thing-including suggesting to just wait until they were on their recently prescribed adhd medication for a while because they’re often appetite suppressants) because they were worried about the effects of them on an adolescent (primarily fertility, but also other side effects such as, as mentioned, bone issues).
i’m trans now, but back when i was 7 and still thought i was a girl, i was given puberty blockers to stop an early puberty. i took them for three years and no one ever questioned it. but if i had asked for them when i was 13 and had realized i was trans, it would be much harder to get them prescribed
The more I hear about the transitions of other trans people, the more I realize how unprecedented my transition timeline was. I came out in September 2016, got a puberty blocker in January 2017, and started taking T in June 2017 due to hormonal complications. This happened while I was 12-13. The fact that trans youth STILL has to wait years to even be considered for medical treatment is absolutely insane. My location, previous displays of gender non-conformity, parents, and sheer luck all played a massive role in streamlining my transition, but the fact that I have only met one other trans person who started hormones even close to the age that I did shows how undervalued trans youth really are.
Not to mention those who would've started sooner if they were allowed, because I did come out at 15 and started seeing doctors and a therapist, but my dad (who accepts me now but didn't really 'get it' then on how important it was to me) wouldn't sign off on me starting hormones earlier than 18 because he didn't want to feel responsible because I regretted it. Which as I type this I realize makes me a lot angrier now that I recognized it, even if it didn't really effect my transition effects long term.
Not to be "all children" but at least in America, people seme to really hate children in general. Children are a massive second class citizen population that Americans think is perfectly fine to control their entire lives and dismiss anything they say. Which leads to trans children who just get completely ignored instead of being taken seriously when they express mental trauma with their AGAB.
I think a lot of it comes from a persistent distrust of children and their abilities. It may sound silly to say we need better children rights, but we do. Minors don’t have any control over their living situations, education, or even their bodies and that can and does lead to kids getting hurt or killed. It’s especially clear when people like Matt Walsh liken your experience of knowing your gender to a child playing pretend as a walrus, as if minors have no grasp on reality or themselves.
As a trans man in Russia, the way that u feel so unhuman in day to day life is mindboggling. If in your country u have a chance to do something, ANYTHING- pls do it. Everything can turn around so fast.. no war be safe (also great video 💖)
@@kkilljoy3588 damn built-in TH-cam translator translated "hang in there" as "повесить там" and I read it as "повесьтесь там," which translates to "go k_ll yourself by hanging yourself." I was scared, but then I realized that it must be some kind of idiom, as i reread it ". _. This funny incident actually says a lot about how queer people in russia feel Thanks for the support, bro💚💚;^;
My youngest is nonbinary and, as An Old, I have to admit that I don't necessarily understand what they're going through. But as a parent, I want my kid to be happy and I don't think I need to *understand* necessarily in order to be supportive, which is what I'm trying to do. I've learned a lot from your videos, so thank you for your work 😊
So you're just blindly agreeing with your child on his or her assertion that they're not a girl or a boy, or are both, and you think that's good parenting? Please actually look into what your kid is getting into. If they're female, the chances are they'll get a radical bilateral mastectomy and take testosterone to appear more androgynous. She may take risks like going into male locker rooms and be assaulted. If male, he may decide to have nullification surgery (look it up) and you will have no grandchildren from him. Or he may decide to get breasts and keep his junk and do porn. Maybe you should ask your kid what non binary means to them, and see if it's sensible or nonsense, cut their internet use to supervised only and get rid of their device, stop them hanging out with idiots at school who think they're furries and gender fluid and pansexual when they're twelve. Do your job as a parent and protect your child from the horrible future "non binary" offers.
@@sometimesnevernot The parent is very clearly going out of their way to educate themselves. Cool it with the fearmongering bullshit. As a nonbinary adult myself who has no desire for surgery, has recognized theirself as nonbinary since being a child in the 2000s, born '98 and whom nowadays associates with and has spoken with a lot of other adult enbies, irreversible surgeries are a lot rarer than you're making it out to be. It's much more important that a parent be supportive and educate themselves, participating alongside the child, making sure that they're in actual safe spaces and not just arbitrarily going into opposite-sex spaces where they wouldn't be safe and asking important questions *with* them to ensure that those more key decisions are made while totally informed and aware at a time in the child's life that makes the most sense to them. This isn't to deny that the horrible things you're describing out don't happen, of course, but from my own understanding is largely overblown and based, as I've said in fearmongering. these things seem to majorly happen because a child doesn't feel comfortable opening up about these things with their parents (who are often evangelical christians or otherwise right-wing alt-right-news-slop-gobbling oppressive dickwads who fall for the shit you're spewing right now), so they just never receive the guidance they need to express themselves while also staying safe, and end up stuck stumbling through life because they never had a father or mother they felt like they could actually trust. If you want to actually be helpful why don't you drop the regurgitated right-wing talking points and actually educate yourself too while you're at it.
You’re absolutely correct that you don’t need to understand to support. I’m certain with time and more experience with the concepts you will come to understand your child better but you are doing the most important part, letting them be themself and supporting them along the way. Your child is lucky to have you, though I wish a parent like you wasn’t luck but the standard
'Autistic' content on TH-cam is basically just that, yes. Although this creators very own contribution started out condemning, but eventually just became it... it was a very confused video.
@@jack-a-lopium Which creators? I haven't come across a single autistic CC on TH-cam who is intentionally advocating for the right of medical institutions to tell who is and isn't autistic. With that said, I avoid anything center and/or right wing content, because centrism is just right wing in denial anyway, but even if such autistic CCs exist, I wouldn't consider them to be a majority, and their advocacy is not aimed at an autistic audience, but the allistics who want to force autistics back into the closet.
"In what other branch of medicine do we intentionally exclude key stakeholders and experts from medical policy?" Abortion Women and OBGYNs are regulary excluded from having any input on the legislation affecting abortion and gynecological care. Hell, you're lucky if there's any medical input at all.
i’m nonbinary but have never felt a strong urge to medically transition. i feel disconnected from the societal concept of sex and gender itself, not from my body. i don’t even like calling myself nonbinary, because that in itself is a label. i’ve felt ostracized from the greater trans community because i don’t want top surgery and other things that ftms/ftxs are “supposed” to want. thank you for this video, i feel seen.
You can decide how much to do and/or not do to feel more comfortable in your own skin. There is no required set of check boxes that should need to be checked to be considered who you are. You are valid as you are.
Literally this! If we lived in a world where the body you were born in didnt = gender and roles and stereotypes I wouldnt feel the need to transition in certain aspects... I know Ill be happier when I do but ideally I know I would have been okay with my body had the world not already decided what that meant for me before I ever had the say.
My grandmother was a high school biology teacher from the late 60’s to the 2000’s. During my mother’s childhood (the 80’s), she would invite trans and gay people to the school she taught at and taught her students about them. She would even invite them to her house afterwards for dinner. Teaching about trans people isn’t something invented 10 years ago, it has been around for a long time and is called being a good, thorough teacher and a decent human being.
I never liked the 'born this way' narrative. It would still be wrong to try and change someone's gender if it was a choice. We don't need it to be an unchangeable characteristic for it to be worthy of protection. Most people think religion should be protected, but you can convert and many people when faced with threats will.
I've felt for a long time that if we're going to gain any ground and respect, it will be by standing on our agency. as Judith Butler described, and Alexander expressed from his personal experiences in "I Was a Transgender Child", something about our identities is external, and something about them is located within us. sometimes the external pressure pushes us, sometimes the internal intuition pushes us. and both of those can limit our practical range of choices. but *we* make the choices we feel are best. that is our power and our right as living beings.
Same, kind of tired of playing the optics game, im not saying that I'm gonna 💣 fox news or anything, just that it's annoying to have to "sell" the idea of yourself like a product to others so that they'll "buy" into it
While it should be respected if it were a choice, I really don’t think “trauma causes people to be trans and maybe it’s changeable” is the eat y’all think it is. Personally that very much goes against my own experience of my transness and I know plenty of other trans people with the same experience. Not all, sure, but I don’t see why a) it *cant* be innate and separate from trauma. I would still transition if I didn’t have PTSD. and b) now, when we’re facing a major political movement that seeks to eradicate us, is exactly the time to say that we’re the result of mental illness and aren’t born the way we are?
@@CutieBanana09 i dont think trauma causes transition is what any of them are saying though? maybe im misunderstanding what you're meaning here but no one in the comments youre replying to has really mentioned trauma as a direct cause of people being trans. edit: i reached the point in the video where it was brought up, and trauma causing queerness isnt what is being said there either. its more like trauma can affect your concept of gender for everyone, cis and trans alike i think.
@@CutieBanana09 Uhm, where did anyone here aside from you say anything about "trauma [causing] people to be trans"? I don't even see the word trauma, or anything close to it mentioned anywhere here.
The last "save the kids" movement I recall which was about saving the lives of children was called "Stop de kindermoord" (stop the child murder). This was a Dutch movement for safer streets and to limit deadly traffic accidents with automobiles.
Shout out to all the indigenous peoples whose historic trans history is just being completely ignored… shout out to all the intersex folks who are being told they don’t exist… shout out to all the trans people who exist in spite of it all. Shout out to all the trans people who preceded us, who aren’t here today, but whose lives leave ripples that we can still feel today. Edit: hello yes I am reading all your intelligent replies (highly recommend anyone else to read through) With my use of ‘trans history’ I didn’t mean to be reductive (it was very late at night when I wrote this comment) and the idea of transness requires a concept of cisness that is absent in many cultures. My special interest is gender non conformity and third genders through history- from the sekhet ancient Egyptians, the cult of Inanna, the mahū, the hijra, to that one person called Thomas(ine) Hall in the American early colonies who was assigned the gender of ‘men’s clothes with women’s apron’ so they didn’t deceive the public. But if I say ‘well actually a gender binary doesn’t really exist anywhere naturally and is enforced by colonial rule’ then people tend to get confused, so I just say trans history. Still, although under your original cultures you may not be queered, very few parts of the world lie untouched by colonisation and it’s dastardly cisheteronormative nonsense. And in spaces like this- English speaking comments sections on an American app, any variance is inherently queer. TLDR you’re all right and I should have phrased myself better. And now I’ve managed to infodump on hundreds of innocent people. Mwa ha ha autistic villain be like:
THIS. transphobes *constantly* refuse to acknowledge indigenous third gender, between gender, and transgender identities because it completely discredits how they imagine a 'successful' society to be
And shout out to all the genuine autistic (which is a real disability, btw) people this vile TH-camr (and all others like him) are appropriating for whatever reason on the internet. He's as oppressive and as far-right as anybody... despite being a brack man. It's all some weird kink, right? Disability kink Love it!
It’s not even just indigenous people. Many many cultures in Asia, Africa, and even the pre-Christian and pre-Islamic Middle East and Europe. In Southern Italy where I am from, we have a third gender called femminielli. Theyre neither considered men or women and in fact many femminielli are intersex. Femminielli are conceptually descended from Ancient Greco-Roman eunuch priests from Hellenic Turkey, and the concept of the androgynes of Hermaphroditus.
Ah, perfect, another video to anxiously watch next to my mother, crossing my fingers that This is the one that magically snaps her out of her cyclical transphobic logic so we never have to have another conversation about "transgenderism" EDIT: It went pretty well, actually. We had an in-depth conversation about our contrasting experiences with gender and humanity in general. She's come a long way since I came out to her over a decade ago, if not as far as I'd prefer. There's still a lot to work on, but it's something. I attribute a lot of her progress to the accessibility of trans creators online and her willingness to engage on some level with their works alongside me, so thank you so much to people like Alexander Avila for making that possible. I hope all of you who are looking for breakthroughs with your families find them, and otherwise find belonging and understanding here and elsewhere ❤
As a cis-woman who has nonetheless struggled with the strict confines of gender (why are girls not allowed to show rage, again?), I have long felt that all forced gendering is traumatic. The filing down of differences and overlap in how we express ourselves causes mental health issues. I try to offer different options to my kids and encourage what they themselves take interest in and try to protect that expression.
Behind the rage there is other feelings, such as sadness, fear, righteousness. And behind the feelings there is needs and values. As a child you don't know how to handle feelings, it's an adults responsibility to be there, regulate and help the child how to navigate feelings. If you were not allowed to be angry, you probably had emotional immature parents/adults.
The expectation that I'd like cars and sports and other boy things was frustrating. I picked a "favourite" sports team and player just so I'd have some names to throw at people rather than have the discussion about finding sports boring. Which has led to a mild but long-lasting resentment toward every sport. Trauma may be too strong a word for that but it's in the same direction.
When you were talking about how capitalism needed population control to protect the capital's interest I was sooooo ready for eugenics name drop and you mentioned it 6 minutes later
I wish i could have transitioned as a teen. I came out as trans at 33 and my mother came out as a terf. She told me that if i tried to transition as a teen she would have had me institutionalized, which likely could have done as a medical doctor herself. She refuses to use my pronouns and won't stop buying me feminine things, and won't let me leave or work out of the house, or consult my doctor about transitioning with becoming physically violent. God i wish i wasn't so broke I'd move out.
Later in life when you mature emotionally you'll thank her for not playing along with the regressive sexism of the T movement (lots of people are like teenagers emotionally their whole lives, even me I'd say I still was in my 30s).
@@ambientjohnny telling someone whose mother is so abusive she won’t even let them leave the house or work that they’ll ’thank them later’ is some psychopathic sh*t
@@Celestina0 You're ignoring the fact that this person is sabotaging their own life by refusing to accept material reality and deal with their issues in a mature way. Personal happiness cannot be dependent on others affirming delusional beliefs.
@@ambientjohnny Please do, just for one moment, ask yourself: "And what if they had a happier life if they could transition?" Would you be willing to refuse that to people? Why?
35:29 Whelp. I've officially reached a point in which my autism hinders my thirst for psychological and anthropological knowledge. I've seen this scene numerous times, but always interpreted the joke as the store initially being "Chuck's Seed & Feed" and the alliteration provided by the new owner Sneed is a funny coincidence.
A funny thing about this joke is that it spawned a weird 4chan thing called "sneedposting" where they explain the joke in a deranged manner. I think it's because the joke goes by so fast and is so complicated that it ironically falls totally flat on what should've been a very simple joke
SAME! i felt so disappointed i went all this time not getting the joke, especially since its a really funny joke, my brain just couldnt comprehend it without someone saying it
Well: that was just exceptional. I've never seen gender theory described so succinctly and accessibly. And what a rallying cry at the end. I'm awed and inspired. - S.
This video really gets to the heart of why I'm so outspoken about being transgender. I'm a trans guy who has a beard, a flat chest, and a fairly broad body, so no one assumes I'm anything other than a cis guy at first glance. I know I could easily be "stealth" but most of the time I tell people I'm trans, as long as I feel safe doing so. My view of the world is so fundamentally shaped by the way I view sexuality and gender that it always seems to make its way into my conversations with people. I recently had a conversation with a 60 year old woman who is in a public speaking class with me, and she was talking about how she rushed into a relationship during the pandemic and came to regret it. This is a straight woman who has very little knowledge of the queer community, but she was respectful and open to conversation, so I said "theres this concept in queer theory that i think you might resonate with called 'compulsory heterosexuality'." Once I explained it, she immediately agreed with the idea, and we talked about how the expectations of women to always be in a relationship with a man hurt not just queer women, but ALL women. I talk about being transgender because I want people to reflect on their own relationship with gender and the effect that being shoved into a category with ridiculous amd contradictory expectations has had on who they are. I want to show people how society's rigid ideas of binary sex and gender hurt everyone, because no one fits into those categories. Trans people are not an exception to a rule, we are proof that the rule should not exist in the first place.
Beautiful anecdote, thank you for sharing! Im still figuring out my identity (I guess we always are on some level) but I've grown up being percieved as a Cis man. Its so strangling to interact with societal standards you absolutely loathe. I feel a lot of people in general feel pressured to be in a relationship, it always makes me feel a little uncomfortable seeing people (even myself at times) longing for connection but forcing themselves to contextualise it as a relationship, especially a hetero one. I think this all adds up to why theres so many problems with perception of dating and relationships, because people dont have the tools to navigate their own social lives. Add in us as a society starting to unpack years of toxic expectations and social norms and it leads to a lot of paranoia and confusion, and a lot of just hurt all around for everyone. Then on top of that you have social media and bad actors who genuinely do want to push others down and hurt them and its all just so overwhelming.
There’s a quote from Gender Outlaw that’s something like “who is transsexual? Whoever admits it”. (Because nobody fits into the gender boxes, everyone is dissatisfied with the gender system; some people just have higher levels of and/or lower tolerance for that dissatisfaction than others.)
compulsory heterosexuality is completely not about "you might not be straight" but the sexual oppression of women to be socially pressured into relationships with men on any level for security due to them not being ever recognized as full humans in the face of societies throughout the ages. This has nothing to do with gender and everything to do with the sexual oppression of women as a SEX. AKA sexism. Trans people have little to do with this concept, and seems more like a symptom to the oppression as a means to escape it.
@@carmabis432 the way you completely ignored the entire point of the comment just to be transphobic is really impressive. take a good hard look at yourself and grow, if you can.
As a nonbinary person who considers myself genderless this is so comforting to hear. I always say I feel like I’m me irrespective of my body but I recognize that I am female in society it always weirds people out that I “accept” that. As someone who has my degree and has done research in biology, I look at sex as no different than any other genetic mutation. It was what was needed for our species survival. Me being born female is no different than me being born a few inches shorter than my siblings. It was what I won in the genetic lottery. However, I realize even though I feel (and the people around me feel) that my body is genderless it won’t change that fact that in my life time my body will mostly be seen as female and have social expectations that comes along with it. I always say I’m trans only because we live in a society that forces us to reject nuance.
i'm so intrigued by the idea of sex as a mutation that evolved simply bc it was enough of a survival aid to merit passing on. makes me consider the vast sexual variations of animals and how those are often very specifically adapted to their ecological niches. why shouldn't the same apply to humans? thanks for the food for thought!
@@alexba1leysex quite litterally is just a genetic mutation. All genetic traits we have come from genetic mutations. Green eyes, brown eyes, having eyebrows, standing on two legs. The very first creatures reproduced asexually and therefore, didnt have sexes. Even some species that do have sexes, dont have sexual dimorphism so you cant even visually tell the sexes apart. Humans just had mutations that resulted in 2 distinct sexes (and of course intersex).
Alexander bro, thank you. I am not aware of any transperson being in my life, but with your efforts I have significant background on both the history of sex, gender and the humanity that exists within us all - cis or trans. I know in my heart that to reject those who are trans is to reject our humanity itself - a silly, ignorant practice of self hatred in the interest of preserving egos formed within a system ruled by those who "have" wanting to have even more. Now I have more words to express that sentiment. Too many cis people have conversations amongst themselves deciding what being transgender means without a clue of how life is if they'd place themselves in your shoes AND without any significant effort to gain the ability to do so. You provide quality content that I can confidently share - and what little excuse there was to be in a state of ignorance ceases to exist. You've done the work for us. Also the backdoor sex jokes 🤌
trauma as a cause for any gender or sexuality is a really interesting idea. i think cis men probably could relate to that idea if theyre open to the idea that bullying causes trauma. men are often bullied into manhood. that kind of trauma makes a man more set in masculinity. sexual assault works to subjugate women and force them to understand their "place" in society. that kind of trauma can make women more set in femininity as well.
@@airplanes_aren.t_real I hate that this has become a stereotype. I'm ace. I have sexual trauma. My trauma has never impacted my inability to feel sexual attraction in any way.
@@wintergray1221 I think it's because it's the easiest way people can rationalize this sexuality (not say they should do that just that they do) It's much easier to think Trauma can make a person not like something->people can have trauma from Sexual assault-> asexuality That's the same root problem of the whole "born this way" thing, it aims to rationalize instead of acknowledge or inform
great video essay!!! just a note, there’s a history of necessity to the “born in the wrong body” narrative - it’s not just that it was a convenient way to describe ourselves to cis people, but it was the kind of keyword that trans people (mostly women) knew they had to use to access transition care in the late 20th century, like you discuss from your own experience at the beginning. Julia Serano outlines this history in Whipping Girl!
“Sneed’s Feed and Seed: Formerly Chuck’s” Me: haha it’s funny because “Chuck’s Feed and Seed didn’t rhyme. Sneed just happened to buy the business” Moments later: … oh
As a trans non-binary person that doesn't fit any of the popular boxes, I've been long dissatisfied with the way as you said sex and gender are locked in a cage. I find it hard to put into words just how dehumanizing it feels for not only my falling out of the norm to be pathologised but many of my gender identity related wants and needs to be completely dismissed as not even being gender related. As if others could objectively decide that for me.
every video this dude makes really amazes me. i've only been following for a few months, but the content, the comedy, the production value, the aesthetic material, everything is WAYYY too good for the subscriber count.
@@cyclicozone2072how many comments am i gonna find u under doing this same little basic transphobic statement. ur actually so funny, it brightens my day to know ppl like u hav seriously nothing fucking better to do, like wow, it’s pathetic in such a funny way. i’m sorry u don’t like the boy in the video but i don’t think calling him a girl 500 times is gonna hurt his feelings or change anyone’s minds silly
@@cyclicozone2072What you are doing is considered spam so I will report you for it. Over a 100 comments… Get a life, instead of getting yourself angry on TH-cam.
@cyclicozone2072 I used to be insecure about transitioning late in life, but if someone this manly can be called a lady, i guess I have nothing to worry about, I'll go out and be the best woman I can. Thanks for the self esteem boost!
As a GP in training this was incredibly useful to listen to. The current medical establishment is unapologetically and unilaterally supporting the Cass report. It is all in the name of “protecting children”. But at no point do they even acknowledge that trans children could even be real. They show incredibly little insight into how trans people experience reality or their own medicalisation. This felt like a much more honest and empathetic take on trans healthcare than entire medical journals. Thank you.
i completely agree...the narrative that sex and gender are separate and that trans people have the brain of the gender they feel they are has always bothered me. gender is just extremely complex and a personal connection to the world which doesn't have to make sense, because nature doesn't really have a purpose. i'm genderfluid and i've always seen my connection to gender more weird and complicated than the way people simplify it whether that be with transphobic intentions or activism intentions
Yeah, I often find myself thinking into tangled spirals when I try to really think through that model. It just doesn’t quite fit the puzzle it’s trying to solve. The lines of everything are too blurry to have that distinction and you can’t truly know who you are outside of the culture that influenced you. I really liked Alex’s discussion of experience and trauma influencing gender. I identify as nonbinary but sometimes I’ve felt like a fraud because I don’t fit into any of the popular narratives of what that means, and I think my feelings about gender are strongly linked to my asexuality. And I thought if my gender is caused by my sexuality, it must be fake because I don’t feel like I have a nonbinary brain, I feel like an asexual who is distanced from my assigned gender because of it
@@Shoulderpads-mcgee I am also on the asexual side of things and I think I would actually identify with being agender which because it isn't apart of a binary I would also consider non-binary or if you were to say I had to have a gender I would say that I am my own gender, I literally have never cared at all what my gender is or even what my sex is because there were more interesting things to talk about. From my view everything we talk about is a social construct because we socially construct these barriers between things that don't actually exist, although certain barriers are more useful constructions to talk about how and why things work. I even recognize that had I gone through even a slightly different life up until this point I could likely be a hugely different person. I use the pronouns of he/him because that is what I am used to and don't see a reason to change it. I do find it interesting to relate to other people on issues like this though because not only do I find it satisfying to some degree but because it might help someone else figure something out.
for me, when i first heard about transness around age 12-13, the brain vs body thing made sense, and was even something that kind of resonated with me, but as soon as i learned that "male" and "female" brains don't exist, maybe a year or two later, it became that much more complex and interesting. i LOVE that it isn't as simple as a mismatch between the mind and the body. it made my journey exploring my gender and sex that much clearer. i wasn't cis, and i wasn't a tomboy. in my mind i am very feminine in how i feel, but never a girl, and never a woman. and finally recognizing gender dysphoria in myself was the moment i allowed myself gender affirming care. it's all so complex, and that's what makes it interesting, worthy of exploring, human. why is every difference pathologized and demonized instead of explored and supported? well, bc humans naturally fear the unknown, but as soon as you explore it, it's no longer unknown, so why recoil and try to destroy it instead of exploring it in a safe environment with open arms?
It is about a brain body mismatch. The mismatch is what causes dysphoria. And if you don't have dysphoria, you aren't trans th-cam.com/video/8QScpDGqwsQ/w-d-xo.html
The 'gendered brain' thing to me feels like an extension of transmedicalism. If I, a trans woman, went to a doctor and got my brain scanned, and it turned out I had a 'male brain', would that immediately invalidate my transness? Transmeds are already constantly putting down trans people who don't fit their very specific definition of transness, and ideas like having the 'wrong brain' or being born in the 'wrong body', while they may apply to many trans folks, should not be used to define transness as a whole.
My day has been really off and really scary, I'm going in for my first try at kind of the last effort to get my mental health on track. Within 2 hours, ketamine will be coursing through my veins, and I'm nervous. And even though that experience and this comment have nothing to do with this video or its content, I just wanted to say that if there's anything that could bring me some comfort no matter which way it goes today, it's going to be watching this video when I get home. I'm so grateful.
Hey there! I am here to tell you that you don’t need to be nervous. I’m on Spravado and have had an injection treatment before too. You will be 100% fine and odds are your depression will get better. I’ll see you on the other side!
I'm envious. I think this treatment has been proven to be very effective. Good choice. I believe you feel immediately better after. Good luck to you. Don't worry.
@@rosshowarth3266 I also thought you feel immediately better afterward. In retrospect I realized that's very foolish. You don't just magically make decades of trauma disappear. You have to feel it.
This video really really means a lot to me. I've grown up in Florida and been here most of my life surrounded by conservatives and pushed down upon by my hard republican parents, forced to conform to their idea of "masculinity" forced to play sports, make friends, give up things I liked that weren't traditionally masculine, art, collecting stuffed animals, and playing pretend. For awhile I was headed down the path they wanted me too, until I found the internet specifically discord. After Years and years of roleplaying, meeting people and making art on discord I found out more and more about queer people and trans people, I started to question myself. "Am I straight?" "Is there a reason I've never had a crush?" "Am I even cis gender???" And finally, within the last month I've come to the conclusion that I wanted to be a trans women after trying out she/her for a few weeks and it just feeling right for me. Still finding myself and deathly afraid of my parents but this spectacular video really has shone me, and reinforced my decision. Thank you so much for making this.
Succumbing to outside pressure is an issue with strength of character. Funny that you don't realise just how rigid and regressively sexist the ideas of "gender identity" within the T movement are, wholly reliant on validating and perpetuating sexist stereotypes themselves.
@@ambientjohnny Johnny, if you cannot perceive the cruelty of your words here, I think you might do well to take a serious look at yourself. You are correct about one thing though. To resist pressure from parents, media, government and society requires incredible inner strength. It takes time and patience to discover what kind of person you wish to be and how to actively bring your unique and authentic self to bear upon the world. Men can passively adopt the role they have been given, or they can decide for themselves what kind of man they wish to be. The same goes for women and enbies. @dragonfang481 You have that kind of incredible inner strength. Given time, you will figure out what kind of woman you want to be. Perhaps you will find yourself fitting comfortably within some of the more commonly held categories, or perhaps you'll find it feels correct to present more unconventionally. Perhaps your ideas and feelings and expression will change over time, subtly or drastically. Among many other things, modern intersectional feminism is about allowing every woman the freedom and safety to be the kind of woman she wants to be. In a just world, you will have that freedom and safety. Good luck.
@joanmoriarity8738 thank you so much for your kind words, they mean the world, for many years I've been living under my parents being what they wanted, giving in because I thought I had to, and even if still my parents won't support me doing this, I know I don't need their support and that I need to focus on myself, my mental health and what makes me happy. It's so nice to know I'll be accepted out there, with support of friends who truly care about me and want me to be me, I can be strong and find out what I want to be, man, woman, hell even intersex, I have a lot of self discovery to do before I really figure myself out and for now she/her is working for me. And again thank you
I can’t get over the Cass Report using AI generated images. Nothing supports your totally 100% scientifically sound report like incorporating images of people who literally do not exist.
@@albertfralinger2711 it's one of many pieces of evidence that trans voices were not included in the report. it suggests the report's authors view us as... less real than themselves. and easily replaced.
1:14:06 "We only pathologize this incongruence when a trans person experiences it. To long for your gendered assignment is a virtue, but to long for another assignment is a sin." 1:15:46 "Why do we medicalize and pathologize certain relationships to gender, and not others?" It really is so arbitrary.
While still listening: I've been bursting into laughter with pure joy and fun every now and then. Not only is this very interesting and well put, but also entertaining af
It's true, Alexander sold me a (quite a high quality rip) copy of Romi and Michelle's High School Reunion for $7 outside of a Dollar Tree in Sunnyvale, CA.
@@cyclicozone2072 oh the irony when you adhere to objectively the most unhinged, conspiratorial, delusional ideology currently infecting the western world. Anti-trans ideologues give flat earthers and Scientologists a run of their money (and overlap with them quite a bit).
I am trying to get a mastectomy and its so hard. My parents insurance would normally cover it, but doesn’t because its through a religious organization. I am also on state medicaid. Which may or may not cover it. I can’t afford the 10,000+ surgery. I hate that this stuff is considered not essential healthcare
Your vids always hit me hard at some point even though I think I know where we’re going and assume I know most of what we’re going to cover/are on the same page/have heard most of this before being a well researched person who is quite a bit your senior. Yet at some point I’m always struck by your intense insight on the subject and really so glad you’ve dedicated your mind and time to this career and I’ve been fortunate enough to hear your words. You deeply contribute to an intellectual path forward in this world and we all benefit that your mind is being immortalized on a public platform. I hope you are backing everything up somewhere in case TH-cam goes bust some day so these can all be reposted elsewhere bc this is an archive for the ages like quality literature, truly.
In general nature defies simple and exact categorization. Even laws of physics aren't exact categories but understandable models. Newtonian mechanics, force = mass x acceleration, etc. is in fact an aberration itself, "only" applying to masses larger than quantum size and speeds lower than that of light. Not to mention gravitational distortion of time, etc. In biology we have all the different kingdoms of life, where fungi used to be considered vegetation and rocks used to be considered life forms.
I love this line of argumentation because while we've become so used to desperately trying to stick everything into some sort of category or box (in order to understand and/or to feel superior) it just doesn't work like that. I know people generally like certainty but really, nothing is certain or final and I wish that thought would just permeate culture more. Things can be, but they don't have to. We may know but we may not. All that is left is our attempt to be kind to each other and get along.
Looking into cladistics is really interesting and definitely in line with all this. You grow up thinking you can easily sort animals into mammals, amphibians, reptiles, birds, and fish, but looking deeper into the relationships between organisms makes it clear that that’s reductive. Birds turn out to be a type of reptile, and fish becomes a useless category full of animals that are nothing alike. It really mirrors all the people going on about “basic biology,” but that’s just it, they only know basic biology because they never dig into it. They understand sex and gender at the basic level of chromosomes the same way a child understands animals by those simple and reductive categories. But nothing is ever that simple. Trans people exist, intersex people exist, and the platypus is a mammal who lays eggs. Whenever you write a rule, there will be an exception that defies it.
Thanks for this. I've been more and more frustrated with the way trans people and gender and sex are presented even in leftist spaces, despite understanding where they were coming from. I also took classes about gender and languages studies last semester and I asked a lot of questions regarding stuff you talk about in this video (especially at the end), but I never felt satisfied with the answers I was given. This video felt very satisfying though, and even made me cry because getting answers that make sense from someone who has the same way of thinking of gender and sex as me but is also trans is something I hadn't had before. Anyway, now I really wanna read Preciado and Foucault.
"americans support trans people in practice just not in theory" is literally so real tho, 90% of the transphobia I've ever experienced was from disapproving strangers in public spaces glaring at the sight of me being so gender-nonconforming (huge honkers and rogaine beard), but in every instance of introducing myself to new coworkers or classmates, people i would have to interact with for more than 2 seconds of eye contact, they were always very respectful and made a pointed effort to get my pronouns right, even when I was usually the first trans person they'd ever met.
Its interesting to see this after recently being told I couldn't use my preferred name and pronouns. It feels nice to see so many people who feel the same or similarly. Makes me feel less crazy.
I definitely was the one nervously nodding haha. This video was very insightful and really opened my perspectice. Apart from that, the editing, lighting, artistic direction and even the jokes were all on point! Amazing video!
I've gotten to 55 minutes in and it completely recontextualises the "swing back" I am seeing within the trans community. The growing rejection of the idea "trans people change gender, not sex" and instead the standing of our ground on the concept of "many of us do change, fundamentally, our sex. We change so many fundamental traits that build into what's called 'sex' that the only correct way to describe it is that we change sex." The understanding that we're not changing a concept that we put forwards in the first place is important. That we're only working with whatever is publicly digestible at the time, and of course many of us disagree with the definition of what we are, because it was defined *for* us, not by us. Arguing that we work with gender, not sex, is an idea sold that we just nod along with. And frankly, right now, it's obvious that gender is being used to wrap us up into a conceptual bubble removed from anything else, to be popped when opponents feel it's ready, to leave us seeming to be conceptually ungrounded from reality. And that's what the anti-trans movement are trying to do right now, they try to get us to defend something we don't even hold as true.They've argued that we deal with gender, not sex, and now they argue that gender doesn't exist, actually. Which, is always doomed to fail, because regardless of concepts, we still exist, and if 'gender' is popped, our existence must and will be recontextualised. And we will be 'back' to arguing that sex isn't binary, actually, and we are altering our sex. They don't win, they just force a language change on an existence they can't just argue away.
You are the ones screaming at us that sex and gender are different while at the same time conflate gender and sex all the time. Not us. We don't believe in what you currently call "gender identity" or "gender" nowaday and we know sex is immutable, we never doubted that. We used the pronouns you wanted and acted like you are the sex you pretended to be out of kindness, we didn't actually believe you are that sex and we didn't believe you are some "gender" because we don't believe in this incoherent definition of gender, whatever it is. We were just being kind because we thought you have some psychological condition that makes you feel like the other sex, and we thought you are suffering because of it. No one believes "trans women" are women, no one. We just pretended for your sake. Then you decided to cross all lines, violate our rights and poison science and law with this demented belief of yours, with many young people falling victim to this crazy notion of "gender identity", mutilating thier body, putting themselves on a constant state of hormonal imbalance, agonizing over the fact that their body don't fit whatever "gender" they think they are, and we are done. We are done. People who felt connected more to the other sex have always existed, what is called "gender nonconforming people" have always existed, at least since civilization, I presume. But "trans" is a very modern invention and "trans" as it is defined now just came about 20 years ago, pushed on by millionaires, perverts and trans activists. Science doesn't actually prove any of that and it's not something that developed organically. It's just a frame of thinking pushed by people with an agenda. And you are most likely a victim of it.
Male and female marijuana plants exist. So what do a male marijuana plant, a male insect, and a male stockbroker have in common? Gamete size. Transition cannot change that.
@@XxYwise it's difficult to focus on what you're trying to say when you've listed 3 sources with 3 different gamete sizes. And also irrelevant to even consider gametes here. Noone judges anyone else by their individual gamete size. Speaking of which, for many trans people, gamete size is infinitely small. a big, huge, zero. It does not matter what gamete size is produced because we aren't. Oh, and it's not good optics that you're reducing the worth of people down to something that small, and effectively classing a whole group of *people* by a biological function. A woman is worth so, so much more than her capacity to incubate an egg.
autistic people have been debating for a while now why people on the spectrum are far more likely to identify as nonbinary/gnc than non autistics. obviously we don't know the exact answer, but the theory i think makes the most sense is that we simply don't really understand the complex systems and societal norms that dictate what gender is. everyone seems to know what "maleness" or "femaleness" is but no one can point to one thing i can make sense of.
Even to the extent that "autigender" is a thing. My concept of gender is inextricable from my autism; social norms of gender are so tied up in neurotypical relationships to society that I don't think I could have been cisgender no matter what gender I was assigned.
"Everyone seems to know what 'maleness' and 'femaleness' are" only until you expand the definition of "everyone" to include all humans past and present from all societies. "Everyone knows" is often, especially as used by conservative commentators, a reskin of "God's command". Everyone *doesn't* have the same ideas of how a man should look, and those ideas continuously evolve. Ideas of femininity are a byproduct of male competition: female beauty is valuable only insofar as it confers status on the man with sexual access to it. So no, everyone *doesn't* know what maleness and femaleness are because those are continuously constructed cultural categories. "Everyone" only knows these things if by "everyone" you only mean white middle class Westerners. It's an inherently colonialist reduction which forces one culture's ideas of femininity and masculinity onto everyone else. Bumble, an American made dating app, uses the fact that the women initiate flirting as a selling point, but that's just how flirting is expected to work in Chinese dramas (and therefore presumably in Chinese culture). "Everyone" in America would agree that an essential characteristic of men is romantic boldness, but gotta be the person who points out that the average human is not American. Millions upon millions of people, don't think that's an essential characteristic of men so one can't say that "everyone" knows what a man is. We can also read things written by people from the past, which contain very different notions of what constitutes masculinity and femininity. So, these are not fact-based categories but rather evolving cultural constructs. Neurotypical people seem to be able to disregard what they can observe with their own senses, if pressured by social and financial incentives. People don't hate because it's fun, they do it because their status within society is threatened. However, as someone on the autism spectrum I lack the capability to be willfully ignorant. I can be misinformed, and I might believe misinformation strongly enough to be skeptical of a counterclaim. I might even be afraid of what a certain fact means about my social position. But, I can't simply ignore a fact regardless of how inconvenient it might be. It was always obvious to me that masculinity and femininity were cultural constructs, purely from the fact that I knew gendered expectations were different in different places and different eras. I knew that long before I knew words like "transgender" or "nonbinary".
Mood, I'm an autistic woman, but I still value my masculinity and want to be strong while also still being a woman who isn't butch. It's all so confusing.
It is an exaggeration to say that cis gendered people find it easy to get hormones and all communities should support one another to fight for their human rights to healthcare. UK study found women waiting nearly 9 years for endometriosis diagnosis, let alone treatment waiting times. I am on a 1yr 1mo wait list for this in the UK and it took 5 years to get my hormones sorted out for infertility.
I feel like this video was made for me specifically. I've spent a lot of time trying to understand and articulate the relationship between words, concepts, social constructs, and gender. You've managed to fill in so many of the gaps for me. The explicit knowledge that the construct of gender came from eugenic biologists in order to continue the idea of the binary explains SO MUCH, and I just... dang freakin' words, idk, I just know it's something I'm going to be mulling over for a long time.
I know a trans girl who had her second appointment with the gender clinic two days ago. She’s 14. They made silly jokes about the doctors saying they have 2 extra balls (hilarious, Luna, well done) and it’s possible that she could get on puberty blockers in around 6 months. But they won’t get access to estrogen until at least 16- and even then, only gets a consult with a doctor. Basically, this is how real trans kids live. They’re giggly nerds who say ‘that’s what she said’ and go to school.
Poor kid. No one around to actually show real compassion but happy to push him to castrate himself. Bravo! You are a true progressive and a true friend.
Damn Alexander this is just amazing *standing ovation. The arguments, the style, the color grading, the backgrounds, the fonts, damn... everything, even the examples, don't know what to tell you haha I just want you to know that your artistry is appreciated... the aspect ratio! *chef's kiss man, greetings from Ecuador ✌
Not sure about good intentions....at all. Cass was also in talks with DeSantis over his gender healthcare ban and has history with gender criticals sooooo
I think just like your triangle analogy we are in fact "born this way", each our own distinct shapes. We just then learn to categorize ourselves into boxes through our society and but also our limiting languages. The first part we do not control; the second part we also hardly can control. Though we certainly do change and evolve over time, both what we are and how we think of ourselves and others.
Maybe it’s my asexuality, but I never got the Sneed’s Feed and Seed innuendo until now. I always thought it was just that the prior name was Chuck’s Feed and Seed, and that the new owner’s name was a happy coincidence.
I just wanted to give ya a big BIG thanks for putting in the effort of creating accurate captions, even after working so hard on the video and audio itself.
Send them the link, and ask them to watch. Then, absolve yourself of the responsibility of educating them. I know it can feel like "if not me, then who?" It can be exhausting and traumatic to argue for your right to exist. And it's okay to not engage. You are not the sole pillar on which their salvation rests.
the fact that you uploaded this right after i finished a a research essay on the historical interplay between feminism, queer theory, and trans theory for one of my classes (i was arguing that terfs were anti-feminist by being anti-trans) is just fun timing, i get to go into this for once with some theoretical knowledge of what's behind the curtain I'm about a fifth of the way into the video, but i'll just say before continuing to watch that I something i found surprising in my research was that a lot of the sex/gender distinction theory work did not come from the queer side of things, it came from feminism. Women had been working to distinguish sex from gender for the political reasons of saying there was no physical basis that women were less than men, no physical basis for confining gender roles. Judith Butler's "gender is a performance" theory wasn't even that out there by feminist standards, third wave feminist theory was full of people trying to come up with a new model to understand gender through a social lens instead of an inherent one, with ideas such as "gender is defined by how it relates to other genders" or "gender is the realization of historical possibilities" By contrast, trans theory did come from the queer side of things, and it caused a lot of issues with the feminists. Queer theory was heavily medicalized, because queer identities were seen as mental illness and they had the political goals of challenging that. So trans theory comes onto the stage using this medicalized language, and the feminists hate it, because it reduces gender back to a physical reality rather than a social one. Meanwhile trans folk have issues with the feminists because, well, they're being treated like trans theory is an illness rather than a discussion filled with critical thought. Trans theory quickly adopts a lot of feminist theory, but the initial interactions were really rough because of these issues and some feminists never moved past it also trans theory has been described as "the evil twin of queer theory", which is just marvelously funny, along with the fact that lesbian feminists are both the source of the most intense transphobia in feminist spaces (historical radfems --> modern terfs) and a major source for trans acceptance. I cannot get over how much of feminist views on trans theory, good or bad, always came back to the lesbians
This really fascinates me considering how terf ideology is extremely medicalized and biological, with radical feminists putting so much stock into female anatomy (the creepy vagina cult is a nickname that amuses me) and biological difference. The intense hatred of trans people feels like feminism has been set back so that instead of insisting men and women aren’t particularly biologically different, the narrative has become women are frail and weak and need to have protecting against the hulking and predatory male human. I hate it and it’s bioessentialism immensely.
Love this synopsis! Also always worth mentioning that there has been quite a schism in the historical radfems over precisely trans rights. Cornerstone radfems have vocally fallen out over it. We hear most about the terfs of course, but some really major names oppose(d) them. Catharine MacKinnon comes to mind, as does Andrea Dworkin (if MacKinnon and Dworkin's widower, activist John Stoltenberg, are reliable sources, which I think they are).
@@edn2674 terf litterally stands for "trans exclusionary radical feminist", it is impossible to be a terf without being transphobic, idk enough about radfems that aren't terfs to say but based on the other reply to this comment its possible to be a radfem without being teansphobic, but yeah if you dont consider trans women women or want to exclude them from "female" spaces then thats transphobia. I get the want to have a women-only space, i read a whole paper talking about the history of that desire and the formation of radfems as a group, but defining it as "female-only" isn't doing that and is, in fact, really reductive of about 50 years worth of feminist history working to seperate the definition of "woman" from the definition of "female". To qoute a famous feminist whose name i cant remember rn just google the qoute, "you are not born a woman, you become a woman", this is true for every single woman on earth, cis or trans, being a woman isn't a physical reality it's a social reality. To illustrate this better for you, imagine having trans men in your "female-only" spaces. Google trans men and look at them and think about that. They're biologically female, so they should be welcome in "female-only" spaces, right? But i got a feel that having men with beards and the like in that space isn't what you're going for
@@edn2674 okay so, i feel a little like communication might be breaking down? might be my fault, i'm bad with tone, but ima continue to try to keep a friendly debate tone and assume good faith on your end and hope you can assume good faith on mine so like, let me start by telling a story. I have a younger brother, he's younger than me by about two years, and when we were little he had a habit of running around the house without a shirt on. Because I was also little, one morning I attempted to do the same, but my dad immediately caught me and told me that I couldn't be doing that, and when i asked why i couldn't when my brother could, he didn't really have a good answer for me. this was way pre-puberty, so there really wasn't a physical difference between my chest and my brother's, the only difference between us was that i was a girl and my brother was a boy. because i was a girl, and only because i was a girl, my chest was deemed inappropiate, when though it was physically the same as my brother's, because again, this was way pre-puberty for both of us. this is what i mean when i say there's 50 years of feminist separating sex from gender. Yes, there are physical realtities of the body, but those physical realities don't come with social realities. We, as societies and cultures, apply social realities to those physical realities. When i bring up that "you are not born a woman, you become a woman," qoute, i am explicitly talking about that experience that you describe of growing up in systems that aren't made for you and experiencing hardships and abuse because of it. There is nothing about these systems that are inherent to having a vagina, people made these systems by projecting them onto having a vagina or not. To put this in the historical perspective, i think it's fairly well-known that a lot of historical works view women as lesser, not just worth less but less capable of tasks than men were, less intelligent, weaker, etc. Feminists spent years challenging this, they spent years arguing that just because you're born with a vagina doesn't mean that you're less intelligent or less physically capable than someone born with a penis, these were all just social expectations being projected onto the physical body. as a kid, i was not aware that my chest was considered sexual. I did not become aware that my chest, as a girl, was considered sexual and inappropriate until that day when my dad stopped me from running around without a shirt. The body does not come with labels, we apply those to it later. This is what "becoming a woman" means, its the process that society that applies to people born with the female sex that shapes them socially into women. As for trans folk, I don't think we should ignore physical realities either! in fact, the discussion is made much richer by taking those realities and lived social experiences into account. For instance, there's plenty of trans women who talk about the experience of losing male privilege as they start to be able to pass, and the emotional and social experience of that, of having tasks that you previously had been accepted as competent at being questioned, even though nothing about you changed except for your gender presentation. I remember reading a post from a trans man who talked about how they were very emotional and empathic since childhood, and when they were seen as a girl that was encouraged, that was seen as a positive, but the second they came out as a man, the expectations shifted, and suddenly being emotional was a bad thing and they were being expected to be less emotional, less empathic. These are the same people, with the same bodies even, but changing their gender presentation changed how people think about and treat them. If these things were truly inherent to the physical body, then why did they change? It sorta reveals how inherently fluid gender and gender roles are when changing your presentation suddenly changes the entire way the world interacts with and sees you. (also, side note, cis women do experience gender dysphoria. Off the top of my head, lesbians or promiscuous women tend to struggle with feelings of being "too masculine" due to their sexuality and the social expectations thereof, women who have undergone mastectomy tend to struggle with what they feel as a loss of femininity, there's an entire field of commerce called make-up and cosmetic surgery that exists, in part, because of women feeling like their body doesn't match who they are inside and trying to fix that, gender dysphoria isn't just a trans thing) (men also experience gender dysphoria too, thought it important to note, just think of any of the ways men feel it necessary to reaffirm their masculinity) I will give you points for the trans men thing, at least you're consistent with that, and i appreciate you taking the time to say we shouldn't exclude masculine women. That said, your inclusion of them in your "female-only" spaces speaks to my real issue with the term. by defining a space as "female-only", then excluding transwomen but including transmen, it somewhat reveals that you don't think of them as "real" women or "real" men. It reveals, inherently, that you think of transwomen as "men acting as women" instead of as women in their own right, and you think of transmen as "women acting as men" instead of men in their own right. I am aware that the use of "female" in "female-only spaces" is being used as a substitute term for women, and you confirm it yourself by immediately comparing transmen to gender-nonconforming women instead of acknowledging them as men. Your goal is not to create a "female-only" space, your goal is to create a "women-only space", but you are defining a woman by their biological sex, which means the inclusion of transmen and exclusion of transwomen inherently means that you do not respect their gender identities, you do not think of them as real men and women. I'll end by saying, again, I understand the want for a space for women only. There is something to be said about solidarity and community, and I can get the appeal, but defining a space as "female-only" does not do that. Feminists have, for years, worked to show that the biological sex has almost none of the effects that we subscribe to it, and that those effects are instead social realities we've projected onto biological sex. Continuing to define women by whether or not they were born with a vagina is reductive and honestly? a little insulting to women, I know I am more than my physical sex, I am an agent in deciding my own gender presentation and how i interact with societies expectations for me, and reducing that down to my physical body is deeply insulting. I don't want my definition of womanhood to hinge on what's in my pants. We can acknowledge physical sex and the effects of growing up while seen as a certain gender while still respecting trans identities, and i think the conversation is better if we do. (also, where do intersex people fall in your spectrum? many of them get raised as women but they aren't "natal women", this video we're debating in the comments of does a good job discussing that aspect of this, even if we define by physical sex it turns out that physical sex isn't just "male and female" either)
@@littlegirlgogo Your comment was very insightful and it informed me a lot, so I'd like to reply to it with the same complexity/dedication. Right now I can't do that but I just wanted to thank you for the explanation
You mentioned the ingrained believe in history that men were hot like fire (😏) and women were cold like ice. If this belief stuck around in our culture my nerd brain immediately thought of the Xmen character Iceman. One of the main examples of a gay character in superhero comics. Its probably nothing but it’s interesting
I know you are giving Cass the benefit of the doubt in this video, but its important to mention she follows multiple explicitly anti-trans accounts on social media and has met with multiple anti-trans figures in the past. In the interview where she states she isn't against puberty blockers, she also directly contradicts many clear and direct statements said as fact in the study. So at this point its either that she didn't read the study at all before publishing it and had someone else write it; OR that the goal from the start was to create a modern, reference-able study for anti-trans legislation and movements to use while quietly walking back any statements to quiet outrage.
your visual metaphors and overall video style are incredible!! and I really can see how you are improving and having fun with your art) and thank you so much for the topic you are really cool
I think its also worth looking into how capitalism manufactures these social issues as a defence against social/class unity against it. Its a preservation mechanism. However, in order to expand itself and make greater profits etc, it has to include more and more people and lowkey 'tolerate' the people it once excluded. But, at some point and I think its close, it'll run out of people to demonise and distract us with and then, we'll all kinda accept eachother because we have to work jobs with eachother, but not capitalism itself, then (provided we foster true solidarity) we'll be the collective that could bring it down.
@@loadishstone I would like to direct you to the section on capitalism less than halfway through the video. Abstracting the language doesn't mean not understanding the underlying complexity
I kinda disagree because with the end because IMO there's always a way to make up a new category to put people into, and I think that's part of human nature (related to how our brains are only designed to really "know" about 50 people in our lifetimes.) The way out is to foster a more communal spirit, where people have commonality as fellow humans despite any difference, which fortunately is also a natural human (even animal, in ideal circumstances) trait.
@@loadishstonethat’s like saying books are just words. When something is so ingrained into society it shapes every aspect of it, the system becomes the universe. If nothing is allowed to exist outside of capitalism in this country then it’s not just a system but a culture. Every one of us is a part of the culture. Even trying to rebel is done in the same way as conforming. Capitalism is an ideal made real. You have millions of people believing in and allowing something to shape their reality. Capitalism is a god. Gods die when no one believes
8:04 "He graphed the UK's data on a logarithmic scale to demonstrate that the exponential increase in cases actually occurred in 2009, which suggests a statistically significant probability that the reactionary outrage leading to the Cass Review is FAKE AND GAY." I knew I liked you, Alexander.
just got this video as im about to come out to my therapist. thank you, Alexander Avila, your videos have been so much to me, including your video on self diagnosis and hannah montana. theyve all helped me so much.
Yeah! Because self diagnosis without any clinical professional involvement is totally healthy. I'm uncomfortable during puberty! I must be the opposite sex! 🤦🏻♂️
I hope this becomes a core part of the general conversation about gender and societal goals concerning it. The time and effort spent on legitimatizing our experiences to an existing framework is commendable, but ultimately, I feel, insufficient. Too many have fought for their own inclusion, their own normalization only to turn around and ridicule and undermine similar struggles, for us to keep using the same systems and frameworks without question. We don’t need to categorize brains for our experience to ”make sense”. How physical patterns map onto experience is fascinating, but what value comes from denying that experience if the expected pattern isn’t present? I don’t know. Shit’s confusing sometimes.
And ultimately I think having some hard scientific evidence for being trans would be a disaster. Because if you can isolate a biological factor that causes something, you can then attempt to prevent of destroy it, like those people trying to “cure” autism. If bigots can find a way to eugenics you out of society, they’ll use it
"Too many have fought for their own inclusion, their own normalization only to turn around and ridicule and undermine similar struggles, for us to keep using the same systems and frameworks without question." dont get me started on a certain type of bougie, white, conformity-obsessed tfem.... i deal w/enough of them when i play tf2
You can't make legislations based on something that can't be defined. You have to define something if you want legislations based on it. Every first year law student can tell you that much. You also need a non-circular definition for science, something that can be proved and disproved, otherwise it's not science, it's spiritualism at best.
@@saoirse2963 You people all talk in a particular way when you have not bothered to do the slightest bit of research. You think knowledge is a tone of voice that you can adopt.
Hey, I just wanted to say that this video is amazing and so well produced and researched. As someone who's writing their final paper in college with matters involving trans youth, education, and laws, the amount of interwoven materials and context can get overwhelming. So, really, thank you for such an incredible video and for the bibliography. Definitely gonna rewatch this many times and check the bibliography truly. Once again, thank you for this video and for the (indirect, but still direct) help.
"to hell with nature's purpose" 🔥🔥🔥 the 'natural/unnatural' distinction has always occured to me as impossible. it's like, dude, how can you, perceiving the world through the eyes of a human, truly decide what is naturally and unnaturally human? not to mention, the weight the term 'natural' holds, as compared to just 'teleologically aligned'; the latter admits that it is a contingent distinction based on the framework of study rather than a necessity born out of God's will.
Being bullied and socially isolated and left alone as an autistic child with a dragonology book made my gender dragon and ive had this thought since i was 16.
Oh dear, that's familiar. >>; I didn't have the Dragonology book, though, just a poster of D&D dragons that I had to have on the back of my door because my mom hated it. :c
9:30: The argument that suddenly there are more kids being diagnosed with gender dysphoria, so we should be more selective about who we give puberty blockers to, is stupid. This would be like if there was spike in UTIs and we responded by giving fewer people UTI medication. Insane.
Not really when you presuppose discomfort with the sexed aspects of one’s body means he/she would therefore be better off as the opposite sex… and you start drugging and operating on them to make it so…
Get the full picture on every story by subscribing through my link ground.news/alexanderavila to get 40% off unlimited access with the Vantage Subscription or get started with the Pro-Plan for less than $1/month.
You're alright, but your weird autism self-diagnosis video was all over the place. Although I think it's just struck me that the entire 'lying about autism on the internet' thing is a kink thing, right?
It's so that you can r@pe each other and feel somewhat like it's legal. And once you're in that community, you'll likely never get out, just because of the taboo nature of what you guys do to each other, it's ingenious really.
You guys are just common or garden preverts, very cool
throw in that shirt you're wearing for the part about the horses and you got yourself a deal!
Cis people can't comprehend intersex people it's like a Lovecraft concept made by the woke leftist to them
@@jarrellfamily1422 What are you on about? The correct terminology is DSDs, Disorder o Sexual Development, not the misleading and outdated "intersex" label. Every single person with a DSD, is either male or female. Most of the conditions are even fully sex-specific, never affecting the other sex. There is nothing hard to comprehend about DSDs in terms of what sex a person is.
Ew ground news. I thought you were a left-wing channel, why promote ground news and its liberal BS???
In physics there is a saying "all models are wrong, but some are useful."
In biology it’s not a saying, but it’s widely known that all systems of classification are wrong. There are always exceptions. We’re all just trying to make sense of things lol
@@melitrophium well there is a saying “the standard biologist’s answer is I know it when I see it” which is to say, we don’t know and we are scrambling to find places to draw lines, as though evolution did not long prove that there is no such thing as a species, and viruses did not long prove there is no such thing as life.
@@julzbehr6696 real 🙏 on that note, if anyone is interested in reading more takes on how these flimsy boundaries relate to queerness and relationships, I loved "Virology: essays for the living, the dead, and the small things in between" by Joseph Osmundson
Omg this sounds really interesting, thanks for sharing! @@melitrophium
For whatever it's worth, I'm a biologist (specifically a botanist and a quantitative ecologist) and we also use that phrase too. It may be more common for those of us who work more with statistical models of complex systems, like population biologists and ecologists.
As an intersex person, thank you for touching on the hypocrisy of the medical community for banning trans healthcare access for youths while simultaneously forcing intersex youths into hrt and other treatments that they DON'T want because upholding the binary is more important than their agency and comfort. They need to seriously pick a lane.
Their lane is conformity to their version of their religion. What science they use, abuse or ignore has everything to do with their belief they have a right to express power by whaever means. They consider their hypocrisy merely a show of dominance accordingly.
👏👏👏👏
Yes, people with disorders of sexual development have historically insisted on bodily integrity, and as such have no truck with trans activism, which is all about chemical/surgical intervention.
@@umamicashflow1809 I don't need you explaining what I already know back to me with a anti-trans edge, man. Especially after using the term "disorders of sex development". Go find some anti-woke clowns to watch or some shit.
@@umamicashflow1809 I don't know how you got any of those ideas or that it's 'disordered' to be intersex, per se in the first place. And actually there's plenty of *overlap* with the trans community sine many *do* need surgical /'chemical' treatments to feel right, they just don't want doctors arbitrarily trying to alter ambiguous infants or kids to conform to the anatomical binary *before they even have a say in it.*
Notably cause the last figures I saw on it said that doctors somehow have a worse track record of picking 'right' for intersex kids' gender identities than if they'd just tossed a coin. A lot of chromosomal intersex conditions people might walk around all their lives and never even know it, but quite a few go through the same experiences as trans people, who are arguably just another form or degree of intersex anyway.
I liked the video and I wish it had come out in time to cite it in mine lol! The horse analogy is really useful.
There’s a crucial timeline error in the discussion of the Cass Review though: the NHS actually stopped prescribing puberty blockers to trans children in 2021 - not 2024 - in response to Bell v Tavistock, not the Cass Review, and even when Bell v Tavistock was later overturned in the Court of Appeal they didn't resume prescribing. This is important because it shows us a key way these systems operate: they make the decision first (in this case deciding to refuse treatment to trans patients) and *then* create the document that they point to as justification.
The Cass Review not only excluded trans people from its governance board, as you rightly pointed out, but also several members of its advisory board are pro-conversion therapy activists, which was kept secret until *after* the report was published. Some have directly lobbied the British government to prevent a ban on conversion therapy. I think it does the Review far too much credit to get into the weeds of how it conducts evidence reviews; it gives NHS England the benefit of the doubt when the truth is, in my opinion, blunter - NHS England have been told since at least 2013 that the segregated system they are running is bad for patients. They have been condemned in joint statements by international medical authorities multiple times, and even by their own clinicians. Several patients have died on the waiting list. The Cass Review is, in my opinion, an attempt to continue ignoring the negative outcomes they’ve caused and protect the careers of the managers responsible for those deaths.
Hi Abigail, thanks for contextualizing this further. I’ll admit that the British Medical System is not my expertise. I appreciate you highlighting the earlier history of this policy decision that goes back to the Bell v. Tavistock decision. It’s important to note that these policy decisions are not clean reactions to medical research, but politically motivated systemic actions that problematize trans life. Ultimately, the intention of this video was not to be the ultimate Cass Review/NHS “takedown,” so I had to make some decisions on where I spent my energy, leading to some oversights and omissions.
Had it been my intention to take on Cass or the NHS or British transphobia, I would’ve spent a lot more time outlining all the nefarious connections different journalists have pointed out.
You could write an entire video in and of itself that ties together the different suspicious knots in the Cass Review. I assume you’re referring to Trilby Langton and her connections to “Exploratory Therapy.” I think it’s certainly worth the time to show the anti-trans bias surrounding the review. But since this video wasn’t supposed to be a Cass Review takedown video, I didn’t want to make strong claims that couldn’t be quickly, cleanly, and firmly demonstrated.
Rather, I wanted the main focus of this video to be about the frameworks we use to talk about gender. Because even if we lived in a cute fantasy world where The Cass Review was a genuine good-faith effort to “review the evidence,” the whole way of thinking of trans experience as a medicalized disorder is fundamentally flawed. The way I see it, regardless of whether or not you include trans people or surround yourself with sketchy transphobic connections, the search for evidence in favor of gender-affirming care is always going to be fraught as long as (trans)gender identity is pathologized. Underlying the Cass Review is the assumption that a trans life is an undesirable life, a uniquely disordered life, and/or a life to be avoided at all costs. I think this is the larger question that is the heart of the issue.
P.S. Your video on Judith Butler was great!
@@alexander_avila No one can be "born in the wrong body", our brains ARE our body just as much as any other part of it. We are the sex we are, regardless of what our personal relationship is with the sexist stereotypes in society. "Trans" ideology, is regressive and sexist, as there is no "correct way" of being a boy or girl, man or woman, all those terms do is indicate sex and stage of maturity - decoupling sex and gender and trying to make gender into this ludicrous concoction of personality and sexist stereotypes is beyond regressive - it actively harms people who buy into it - the idea that there is something wrong with a kid's body that needs to be chemically altered because they believe living up to sexist stereotypes is some real measure of whether they are a boy or a girl (and man or woman for adults obviously), is insanity.
I have asked hundreds of "activists" and "allies" to explain what they are measuring themselves against to determine that they have a need to transition - NOT ONE person has been able to articulate what that is - not one person is able to distance themselves sufficiently to realise that THEY are the ones with a regressively sexist idea of what it means to be a boy/girl or man/woman and that that is the issue causing all the problems - their own misunderstanding and severely limited perspective/sexist misunderstanding of what sexist stereotypes/"gender norms" actually entail - they are not rules, they are not real boundaries, they are regressive ideas and generalisations - no one needs to live up to any such utter nonsense or feel comfortable with those stereotypes to be a boy/girl/man/woman - all those terms represent, and all they should represent, is sex and stage of maturity - by creating this whole "gender identity" nonsense, THAT IS WHAT CAUSES ALL THE DISTRESS, THIS FABRICATION OF A FRAMEWORK WHICH DISTORTS REALITY.
No one - NO ONE - in the movement has been able to explain or articulate what this supposed "womanly essence" or "manly essence" is that they feel/know/need to transition in order to represent etc. actually is - yet you all actively believe in it and push for it to be accepted. That is ludicrous.
@@ambientjohnny Why all the spam under every person's comment? Couldn't you just make your points once? This isn't the only channel I've seen you do this on. Also, you clearly didn't watch the video.
@@durnsidh6483 Because I'm interested in changing people's minds. The comments I reply to, those users would never see what I say otherwise.
The comment certainly isn't tailored to this video.
Seeing as this is under a PhilosophyTube comment, the channel owner doesn't seem to have the slightest problem with PT going around lying about having changed their sex (he's still male despite lying about being female on Novara Media).
@@ambientjohnny Well may I suggest you take a rhetoric course because people here don't see you as worth engaging with, they see you as an asshole. The fact that you're alleging that Abigail "lied about [her] sex change" again indicates you haven't watched the video.
12:43 hit the nail on the head. I was a cis kid who was on a puberty blocker in the early 2000s for adrenal hyperplasia. There was zero controversy surrounding them then, and even still when I defend trans kids being allowed to use them, transphobes counter with the “you had a medically legitimate reason”. I did indeed have a medically legitimate reason, as do trans kids. My parents and I did not want me going through puberty at 6 years old. Had I been a girl (I’m a cis guy) they would’ve _especially_ not wanted me to go through male puberty as a 6 year old girl. It would’ve been psychologically traumatizing. Yet anti-trans ideologues force trans kids to endure it.
But the actual difference would be that PBs were being used to block an early puberty for you (if i understand correctly) but would be blocking a "natural" puberty for trans kids, and we dont know the effects of that. No?
@@Super-BallSharp We know it blocks the undesired puberty, which can cause actual, real, measurable trauma in trans people. The brain is very much a part of the body that deserves attention and care, same as any other organ. Mental health care is genuine and real health care, the same as any other
@@Super-BallSharpSo you would support the banning of puberty blockers for all cis kids too, surely? Since we don’t have strong evidence, such as randomized double blind studies, demonstrating the long term effects. i.e. for the same reason trans kids are now being denied the medication. Or should we draw a distinction between “natural” and “unnatural” puberty?By age, by cis or trans, by motivation. Whatever it is, if you agree with the Cass report findings, you’ll need strong evidence to support your position to prescribe or not.
@@AnArmoredMarch uh.. i know this? And i dont really see how it counters or answers my question?
@@Super-BallSharp Where does your criteria for "natural" puberty end? Some people might say that someone with adrenal hyperplasia going through puberty at a young age is "natural." Their body "naturally" began developing secondary sex characteristics, without the use of any medical intervention in the first place. Perhaps going on puberty blockers was just as "unnatural" because it put a pause on what their body originally did. Yet most people do not see it this way. They believe the positives of putting cisgender kids with precocious puberty (such as improved mental health due to the ability to fit in, and more time to just be a kid for longer) outweigh the negatives. There are actually multiple long-term studies of transgender children who had been on puberty blockers showing that it greatly improved their mental health in the same way. Yet these are disregarded as "inefficient" and "biased" while research papers created by people with histories of anti-trans opinions are allowed to be used because they're totally unbiased, right? (Heavy sarcasm there). The real problem is that puberty is a ticking clock, and if we keep trying to hold off on puberty blockers for trans kids based on apprehension directly related to their identity (which we do not do for cisgender kids with precocious puberty), the children who really need that care are forced to go through the torment of a puberty they never wanted- usually causing higher rates of gender surgeries like mastectomies in the future to reverse these changes anyway.
I urge you to think more critically about what is so different about using puberty blockers for trans kids and puberty blockers for cis kids, and why it matters.
Sincerely, a transgender man who also has adrenal hyperplasia. :)
Dora richter (the first trans woman to receive gender reassignment surgery) is a really good example of trans kids existing whether you like it or not. Born in 1892, at the age of 6 she reportedly tried to remove her penis to look like a girl. Decades later, she continued to identify as a woman. She was treated by Magnus Hirschfeld, and worked in his institute- Hirschfeld gave her the nickname of ‘Dörchen’. It was believed that she had died in a raid of the institute in 1933 by Hitler youth, but she survived, and the last we know of her was a census in 1939. However, she lived and worked as usual for over 8 years after having THE FIRST vaginoplasty, which is- mad. So cool. Science. Wow.
Also best example for why, if not controlled and mitigated, it's a self-harming medical disorder that exists apart from social gender as invented by ideological progressives. It's a biology-driven dysphoria, not a social one. And of course, medical exceptions validate the normative.
For those who don't know, there has been some recent research and we now know slightly more about the end of her life. The census mentioned showed her living in her hometown after she was granted a legal name change in Bohemia, but it turns out she moved to Allersberg in Bavaria after ethnic Germans were expulsed from Czechoslovakia. She lived there until her death in 1966, 35 years after her vaginoplasty, at the age of 74.
Hopefully we'll learn even more soon, as the researcher mentioned that they learned more but I don't know when that will be published.
Mentioning Magnus Herschfeld in the same paragraph as transgenderism…That’s going to be a yikes from me. Bigots love making this connection. It’s like mentioning Barbara Spectre or Noel Ignatiev.
"Not only transgender people have gender problems."
SAY IT LOUDER FOR THE PEOPLE IN THE BACK.
Like seriously. This is so true. As a cis gender woman with PCOS I'm constantly struggling with the fact that I grow facial hair, and am just... really hairy overall. It makes me feel SO uncomfortable with my own body, and myself. This experience has always made me feel like I could relate to transgender people and what it's like to have gender dysphoria, even though I actually identify with the gender I was assigned at birth.
The female lead from Easy A even said that when she was acting on set (in the plot her character disguises herself as her twin brother and cuts her hair, etc.) being referred to with he/him pronouns in the script gave her gender dysphoria
this is a perfect example of how gender dysphoria is not a trans exclusive experience, in fact most people experience this to varying degrees. We all have our ideal gender for ourselves whether born into it or not. The more people can realise this the more we can understand that harming trans healthcare isnt going to hurt just trans people, but everyone in the long run.
@@iuruoy-shao do you mean she’s the man?
As a transwoman I don't understand why we say that gender dysphoria is only for trans people, I think all insecurities that are linked to gender are gender dysphoria, and that's also why I think gender dysphoria shouldn't be considered a mental illness, most people probably experience gender dysphoria, trans people just happen to not have the "right" gender dysphoria.
@Gladissims
Is it gender dysphoria if I feel uncomfortable about having a very big chest instead of having a flat chest?
(I'm a cis woman, but I greatly envy women who have a naturally flat chest.)
Fun fact: whoever wrote the bible did not say that Eve was created from Adams rib! The hebrew word that is used there means side and is never translated as rib anywhere else. God cut Adam in half to create Adam and Eve, just like in the Ancient Greek spherical people story. The Greek translators are at fault.
Zeus dammed Greeks
Damn greeks indeed
That helps explain the "dual creation" interpretation in some schools of religious thought, primarily in the Khabbalah school where they interpret the repeating of the creation of man as referring to two, possibly three women created in the garden in total, the last one being the one that's known as Eve. The first woman is identified as Lilith, and her crime was being of the same original unitary as Adam (like the Greek concept of the unitary primordial people who were all-sexed/bi-sexed) and thus equal, which wasn't acceptable to Adam.
found a hermeneutics stack exchange question saying otherwise but don't know any Hebrew and thus cannot verify - have a look for yourself though? title is: is the translation rib for the Hebrew in Genesis 2:22 justified?
Imagining God splitting Adam by pulling his legs apart like a wishbone
Hell, they even go in reverse. A friend of mine in school had a disorder that kept him from entering puberty. We were the same age, but he looked like he was half my age. He took hormones or some sort of medication which jump started his puberty. No controversy about that whatsoever.
@@albertfralinger2711 you don't think he wasn't bullied for being smaller than the other students in our grade?
@@albertfralinger2711 The point is that not going through puberty alongside his peers caused him mental distress.
@@albertfralinger2711 The scenario is the inability to go through the puberty that is congruous for the child/being forced to go through incongruous puberty. If he was transfem, he likely wouldn't be as emotionally affected by delayed puberty, as it would be less incongruous than masculising puberty. If it was socially acceptable, then peer bullying wouldn't be an issue either.
@@albertfralinger2711 The thing about puberty disorders is that they're mostly just disorders because society doesn't really like to deal with them.
In cases like this, it's less "get treated because your life is objectively terrible" and more "get treated so that truancy officers don't go hauling you off to the nearest middle school while you're in your 20's" and "get treated because you can't stand being so short anymore"
@@albertfralinger2711 counterpoint-anecdote, I identify now in my adult years as nonbinary and am currently on HRT, this is something I had felt strongly about but couldn't articulate to my parents (who I am very lucky to say would have been totally accepting) due to lack of vocabulary and resources in the 2000s since I was like, 8 years old. Incidentally, I developed a rare and deadly form of cancer around 13-14 that has been linked to rapid early bone development. Puberty blockers may have saved me from near-death and an extremely anguishing and depressing time going through my teenage years trying to cope with the trauma that chemotherapy left me with.
In hindsight, at least, obviously dealing with neither would be the ideal reality, but I would have taken being bullied over being scrawny if it had saved me the hell that is cancer.
"Absolute masculinity or absolute femininity in any individual represents an imaginary ideal" HOLY SHIT EUGEN THAT GOES HARD
Gender fluidity is as much an imaginary deal as your absolute masculinité and absolute féminité. Funny how this so called Woke generation is as much cornered itself into a mental dogmatic box as the previous générations. How one generation destroyed years of hard gained progress, it's uncanny.
Weird that birth control is also associated with lower bone density and but drs seem to have very few questions when putting teen girls on that.
I used to work in teen group homes and some of the girls had hormonal birth control implants that they only kind of had a say in getting, and would get a ton of push back if they wanted them removed.
Matt Walsh is open about his intention to come for that next.
Oh, don't worry, the same bigots who are transphobic are also pro-life (more accurately 'forced birth') and are already looking to abolish no-fault-divorce (their preferred vision being no divorce possible at all) and they'll also eventually advocate against birth control, if their shitty demands keep being codified into law. They certainly don't want schools to educate comprehensively about birth control.
@@Nemo12417well yeah but he’s also been pretty open about how fertile 15 year old girls are and how he is much in favour of getting them pregnant
i mean i’m obviously not against puberty blockers, but i have never seen doctors have “very few questions” about birth control as teenagers?? like it’s definitely not as tightly regulated as puberty blockers, but someone close to me wasn’t given birth control (for pcos) until there was the literal threat of cancer if it continued in the future. yes, of course, they were more open in the sense that cancer wasn’t an immediate or direct possibility, it was only if this person had no periods for many many many years (rather than 4-5 months), but for over two years the doctors tried whatever was possible to not prescribe hormonal medication (primarily the whole “just lose weight” thing-including suggesting to just wait until they were on their recently prescribed adhd medication for a while because they’re often appetite suppressants) because they were worried about the effects of them on an adolescent (primarily fertility, but also other side effects such as, as mentioned, bone issues).
Came for the gender ideology, stayed for the epistemological discussion of medieval vs modern horse girls. 10/10.
i’m trans now, but back when i was 7 and still thought i was a girl, i was given puberty blockers to stop an early puberty. i took them for three years and no one ever questioned it. but if i had asked for them when i was 13 and had realized i was trans, it would be much harder to get them prescribed
The more I hear about the transitions of other trans people, the more I realize how unprecedented my transition timeline was. I came out in September 2016, got a puberty blocker in January 2017, and started taking T in June 2017 due to hormonal complications. This happened while I was 12-13. The fact that trans youth STILL has to wait years to even be considered for medical treatment is absolutely insane. My location, previous displays of gender non-conformity, parents, and sheer luck all played a massive role in streamlining my transition, but the fact that I have only met one other trans person who started hormones even close to the age that I did shows how undervalued trans youth really are.
Not to mention those who would've started sooner if they were allowed, because I did come out at 15 and started seeing doctors and a therapist, but my dad (who accepts me now but didn't really 'get it' then on how important it was to me) wouldn't sign off on me starting hormones earlier than 18 because he didn't want to feel responsible because I regretted it. Which as I type this I realize makes me a lot angrier now that I recognized it, even if it didn't really effect my transition effects long term.
Not to be "all children" but at least in America, people seme to really hate children in general. Children are a massive second class citizen population that Americans think is perfectly fine to control their entire lives and dismiss anything they say. Which leads to trans children who just get completely ignored instead of being taken seriously when they express mental trauma with their AGAB.
I think a lot of it comes from a persistent distrust of children and their abilities. It may sound silly to say we need better children rights, but we do. Minors don’t have any control over their living situations, education, or even their bodies and that can and does lead to kids getting hurt or killed.
It’s especially clear when people like Matt Walsh liken your experience of knowing your gender to a child playing pretend as a walrus, as if minors have no grasp on reality or themselves.
@@cyclicozone2072 bad faith commenter spotted
@@cyclicozone2072 because you didn’t pay attention to the video
As a trans man in Russia, the way that u feel so unhuman in day to day life is mindboggling. If in your country u have a chance to do something, ANYTHING- pls do it. Everything can turn around so fast.. no war
be safe
(also great video 💖)
Stay strong brother 💜
Hang in there. I’m so sorry for your circumstances.
@@kkilljoy3588 damn built-in TH-cam translator translated "hang in there" as "повесить там" and I read it as "повесьтесь там," which translates to "go k_ll yourself by hanging yourself." I was scared, but then I realized that it must be some kind of idiom, as i reread it ". _.
This funny incident actually says a lot about how queer people in russia feel
Thanks for the support, bro💚💚;^;
@@cianuro577holy shit that wrong translation is horrific
I wish all of you the best ❤
@@cianuro577 ёма-ё переводчик шутканул 💀
"For those of you who don't follow the medical fandom"
I have no words to explain how much I enjoy your writing.
Or his "from smooth child to hairy manlet", both ridiculously funny. There's a lot of great lines in the video
My youngest is nonbinary and, as An Old, I have to admit that I don't necessarily understand what they're going through. But as a parent, I want my kid to be happy and I don't think I need to *understand* necessarily in order to be supportive, which is what I'm trying to do. I've learned a lot from your videos, so thank you for your work 😊
So you're just blindly agreeing with your child on his or her assertion that they're not a girl or a boy, or are both, and you think that's good parenting? Please actually look into what your kid is getting into. If they're female, the chances are they'll get a radical bilateral mastectomy and take testosterone to appear more androgynous. She may take risks like going into male locker rooms and be assaulted. If male, he may decide to have nullification surgery (look it up) and you will have no grandchildren from him. Or he may decide to get breasts and keep his junk and do porn. Maybe you should ask your kid what non binary means to them, and see if it's sensible or nonsense, cut their internet use to supervised only and get rid of their device, stop them hanging out with idiots at school who think they're furries and gender fluid and pansexual when they're twelve. Do your job as a parent and protect your child from the horrible future "non binary" offers.
@@sometimesnevernot The parent is very clearly going out of their way to educate themselves. Cool it with the fearmongering bullshit. As a nonbinary adult myself who has no desire for surgery, has recognized theirself as nonbinary since being a child in the 2000s, born '98 and whom nowadays associates with and has spoken with a lot of other adult enbies, irreversible surgeries are a lot rarer than you're making it out to be. It's much more important that a parent be supportive and educate themselves, participating alongside the child, making sure that they're in actual safe spaces and not just arbitrarily going into opposite-sex spaces where they wouldn't be safe and asking important questions *with* them to ensure that those more key decisions are made while totally informed and aware at a time in the child's life that makes the most sense to them.
This isn't to deny that the horrible things you're describing out don't happen, of course, but from my own understanding is largely overblown and based, as I've said in fearmongering. these things seem to majorly happen because a child doesn't feel comfortable opening up about these things with their parents (who are often evangelical christians or otherwise right-wing alt-right-news-slop-gobbling oppressive dickwads who fall for the shit you're spewing right now), so they just never receive the guidance they need to express themselves while also staying safe, and end up stuck stumbling through life because they never had a father or mother they felt like they could actually trust.
If you want to actually be helpful why don't you drop the regurgitated right-wing talking points and actually educate yourself too while you're at it.
based mom
@@TerryVideoZone what made you think you are non binary
You’re absolutely correct that you don’t need to understand to support. I’m certain with time and more experience with the concepts you will come to understand your child better but you are doing the most important part, letting them be themself and supporting them along the way. Your child is lucky to have you, though I wish a parent like you wasn’t luck but the standard
"the medical fandom"
'Autistic' content on TH-cam is basically just that, yes.
Although this creators very own contribution started out condemning, but eventually just became it... it was a very confused video.
left that fandom long time ago, shit got way too toxic
@@jack-a-lopiumit’s just a funny bit pal
@@jack-a-lopium girl what
@@jack-a-lopium Which creators? I haven't come across a single autistic CC on TH-cam who is intentionally advocating for the right of medical institutions to tell who is and isn't autistic. With that said, I avoid anything center and/or right wing content, because centrism is just right wing in denial anyway, but even if such autistic CCs exist, I wouldn't consider them to be a majority, and their advocacy is not aimed at an autistic audience, but the allistics who want to force autistics back into the closet.
"In what other branch of medicine do we intentionally exclude key stakeholders and experts from medical policy?" Abortion
Women and OBGYNs are regulary excluded from having any input on the legislation affecting abortion and gynecological care. Hell, you're lucky if there's any medical input at all.
I was gonna say the same thing. Honestly alot of stuff regarding women's health exclude women and people who work closely with women
also anything to do with fatness
Well they can always close early and go protest.
Yes
Pretty much anything involving opressed people to be honest.
Including kiddos
i’m nonbinary but have never felt a strong urge to medically transition. i feel disconnected from the societal concept of sex and gender itself, not from my body. i don’t even like calling myself nonbinary, because that in itself is a label. i’ve felt ostracized from the greater trans community because i don’t want top surgery and other things that ftms/ftxs are “supposed” to want. thank you for this video, i feel seen.
You can decide how much to do and/or not do to feel more comfortable in your own skin. There is no required set of check boxes that should need to be checked to be considered who you are. You are valid as you are.
Honestly, same
Me too. Kinda OK with my body in the default state it is and mostly just focusing on what's in my mind palace tbh.
^^^ all of this!!!
Literally this! If we lived in a world where the body you were born in didnt = gender and roles and stereotypes I wouldnt feel the need to transition in certain aspects... I know Ill be happier when I do but ideally I know I would have been okay with my body had the world not already decided what that meant for me before I ever had the say.
if joe rogan fact checked me in person to my face i would fake my death
its like that one guy getting ratio’d by the dictionary
I’m not sure faking would be enough for me, I might just die on the spot from pure shame.
Yet it’s clear Matt Walsh has no shame and I think we all knew this long before the Rogan incident.
@@estenslop CANCEL CULTURE STRIKES AGAIN!
If you can say one nice thing about Joe Rogan, he not afraid to point out the clown behavior on the right.
My grandmother was a high school biology teacher from the late 60’s to the 2000’s. During my mother’s childhood (the 80’s), she would invite trans and gay people to the school she taught at and taught her students about them. She would even invite them to her house afterwards for dinner. Teaching about trans people isn’t something invented 10 years ago, it has been around for a long time and is called being a good, thorough teacher and a decent human being.
Your grandmother sounds like a lovely person! I bet she helped many kids keep open minds into adulthood.
I never liked the 'born this way' narrative. It would still be wrong to try and change someone's gender if it was a choice. We don't need it to be an unchangeable characteristic for it to be worthy of protection. Most people think religion should be protected, but you can convert and many people when faced with threats will.
I've felt for a long time that if we're going to gain any ground and respect, it will be by standing on our agency. as Judith Butler described, and Alexander expressed from his personal experiences in "I Was a Transgender Child", something about our identities is external, and something about them is located within us.
sometimes the external pressure pushes us, sometimes the internal intuition pushes us. and both of those can limit our practical range of choices. but *we* make the choices we feel are best. that is our power and our right as living beings.
Same, kind of tired of playing the optics game, im not saying that I'm gonna 💣 fox news or anything, just that it's annoying to have to "sell" the idea of yourself like a product to others so that they'll "buy" into it
While it should be respected if it were a choice, I really don’t think “trauma causes people to be trans and maybe it’s changeable” is the eat y’all think it is. Personally that very much goes against my own experience of my transness and I know plenty of other trans people with the same experience. Not all, sure, but I don’t see why a) it *cant* be innate and separate from trauma. I would still transition if I didn’t have PTSD. and b) now, when we’re facing a major political movement that seeks to eradicate us, is exactly the time to say that we’re the result of mental illness and aren’t born the way we are?
@@CutieBanana09 i dont think trauma causes transition is what any of them are saying though? maybe im misunderstanding what you're meaning here but no one in the comments youre replying to has really mentioned trauma as a direct cause of people being trans.
edit: i reached the point in the video where it was brought up, and trauma causing queerness isnt what is being said there either. its more like trauma can affect your concept of gender for everyone, cis and trans alike i think.
@@CutieBanana09 Uhm, where did anyone here aside from you say anything about "trauma [causing] people to be trans"? I don't even see the word trauma, or anything close to it mentioned anywhere here.
from the moment i understood the weakness of my flesh, it disgusted me
*ORGAN MUSIC INTENSIFIES*
agreed, since i realized i rejected a physical form.
I craved the strength and certainty of steel
-that one turtle who got a little skateboard to zoom around on.
Nanomachines son
The last "save the kids" movement I recall which was about saving the lives of children was called "Stop de kindermoord" (stop the child murder). This was a Dutch movement for safer streets and to limit deadly traffic accidents with automobiles.
the Dutch seem to be the only people in the world who understand cars and are appropriately skeptical of them.
Shout out to all the indigenous peoples whose historic trans history is just being completely ignored… shout out to all the intersex folks who are being told they don’t exist… shout out to all the trans people who exist in spite of it all. Shout out to all the trans people who preceded us, who aren’t here today, but whose lives leave ripples that we can still feel today.
Edit: hello yes I am reading all your intelligent replies (highly recommend anyone else to read through) With my use of ‘trans history’ I didn’t mean to be reductive (it was very late at night when I wrote this comment) and the idea of transness requires a concept of cisness that is absent in many cultures.
My special interest is gender non conformity and third genders through history- from the sekhet ancient Egyptians, the cult of Inanna, the mahū, the hijra, to that one person called Thomas(ine) Hall in the American early colonies who was assigned the gender of ‘men’s clothes with women’s apron’ so they didn’t deceive the public. But if I say ‘well actually a gender binary doesn’t really exist anywhere naturally and is enforced by colonial rule’ then people tend to get confused, so I just say trans history.
Still, although under your original cultures you may not be queered, very few parts of the world lie untouched by colonisation and it’s dastardly cisheteronormative nonsense. And in spaces like this- English speaking comments sections on an American app, any variance is inherently queer.
TLDR you’re all right and I should have phrased myself better. And now I’ve managed to infodump on hundreds of innocent people. Mwa ha ha autistic villain be like:
as an intersex native person thank you.
THIS. transphobes *constantly* refuse to acknowledge indigenous third gender, between gender, and transgender identities because it completely discredits how they imagine a 'successful' society to be
And shout out to all the genuine autistic (which is a real disability, btw) people this vile TH-camr (and all others like him) are appropriating for whatever reason on the internet.
He's as oppressive and as far-right as anybody... despite being a brack man. It's all some weird kink, right? Disability kink
Love it!
@@ReverendBucktoothJesus666🫂
It’s not even just indigenous people. Many many cultures in Asia, Africa, and even the pre-Christian and pre-Islamic Middle East and Europe. In Southern Italy where I am from, we have a third gender called femminielli. Theyre neither considered men or women and in fact many femminielli are intersex. Femminielli are conceptually descended from Ancient Greco-Roman eunuch priests from Hellenic Turkey, and the concept of the androgynes of Hermaphroditus.
Ah, perfect, another video to anxiously watch next to my mother, crossing my fingers that This is the one that magically snaps her out of her cyclical transphobic logic so we never have to have another conversation about "transgenderism"
EDIT: It went pretty well, actually. We had an in-depth conversation about our contrasting experiences with gender and humanity in general. She's come a long way since I came out to her over a decade ago, if not as far as I'd prefer. There's still a lot to work on, but it's something. I attribute a lot of her progress to the accessibility of trans creators online and her willingness to engage on some level with their works alongside me, so thank you so much to people like Alexander Avila for making that possible. I hope all of you who are looking for breakthroughs with your families find them, and otherwise find belonging and understanding here and elsewhere ❤
I wish I could this😭 sadly mom doesn't understand English🙃
good luck soldier
Remember that self-love is an act of spite, to anyone who wants you to be ashamed of yourself. Live anew with wisdom old.
Good luck
@@tawbhwamy mom understands English but would refuse to watch this :(
As a cis-woman who has nonetheless struggled with the strict confines of gender (why are girls not allowed to show rage, again?), I have long felt that all forced gendering is traumatic. The filing down of differences and overlap in how we express ourselves causes mental health issues.
I try to offer different options to my kids and encourage what they themselves take interest in and try to protect that expression.
We’re all just people in the end, and we’re more similar than we are different from each other after all
Behind the rage there is other feelings, such as sadness, fear, righteousness. And behind the feelings there is needs and values. As a child you don't know how to handle feelings, it's an adults responsibility to be there, regulate and help the child how to navigate feelings.
If you were not allowed to be angry, you probably had emotional immature parents/adults.
The expectation that I'd like cars and sports and other boy things was frustrating. I picked a "favourite" sports team and player just so I'd have some names to throw at people rather than have the discussion about finding sports boring. Which has led to a mild but long-lasting resentment toward every sport.
Trauma may be too strong a word for that but it's in the same direction.
"According to data, people don't like psychological torture ☝️🤓" didn't see your sources, not even your data, this whole video essay is ruined
Insufficient double blind trials, I imagine.
I'm suspecting of anecdotal evidences.
sorry to hear that... would it make you feel better to volunteer as a test subject for that?
@@nescius2 i would volunteer 🖐
Yeah they probably should’ve linked the caspian report and the nice report. That kind of stuff is really important for a credible video essay
When you were talking about how capitalism needed population control to protect the capital's interest I was sooooo ready for eugenics name drop and you mentioned it 6 minutes later
Very malthusian
I wish i could have transitioned as a teen. I came out as trans at 33 and my mother came out as a terf. She told me that if i tried to transition as a teen she would have had me institutionalized, which likely could have done as a medical doctor herself. She refuses to use my pronouns and won't stop buying me feminine things, and won't let me leave or work out of the house, or consult my doctor about transitioning with becoming physically violent. God i wish i wasn't so broke I'd move out.
Later in life when you mature emotionally you'll thank her for not playing along with the regressive sexism of the T movement (lots of people are like teenagers emotionally their whole lives, even me I'd say I still was in my 30s).
@@ambientjohnny telling someone whose mother is so abusive she won’t even let them leave the house or work that they’ll ’thank them later’ is some psychopathic sh*t
@@Celestina0 You're ignoring the fact that this person is sabotaging their own life by refusing to accept material reality and deal with their issues in a mature way. Personal happiness cannot be dependent on others affirming delusional beliefs.
Good for your mom. You’re a woman.
@@ambientjohnny Please do, just for one moment, ask yourself: "And what if they had a happier life if they could transition?" Would you be willing to refuse that to people? Why?
35:29 Whelp. I've officially reached a point in which my autism hinders my thirst for psychological and anthropological knowledge. I've seen this scene numerous times, but always interpreted the joke as the store initially being "Chuck's Seed & Feed" and the alliteration provided by the new owner Sneed is a funny coincidence.
well, I thought it was just "Chuck's"
I thought it was just Chuck's as well, but now that I've heard the full joke explained, it's makes way more sense!
Same I literally did not get the joke at all until he explained it
A funny thing about this joke is that it spawned a weird 4chan thing called "sneedposting" where they explain the joke in a deranged manner. I think it's because the joke goes by so fast and is so complicated that it ironically falls totally flat on what should've been a very simple joke
SAME! i felt so disappointed i went all this time not getting the joke, especially since its a really funny joke, my brain just couldnt comprehend it without someone saying it
Well: that was just exceptional. I've never seen gender theory described so succinctly and accessibly. And what a rallying cry at the end. I'm awed and inspired. - S.
This video really gets to the heart of why I'm so outspoken about being transgender. I'm a trans guy who has a beard, a flat chest, and a fairly broad body, so no one assumes I'm anything other than a cis guy at first glance. I know I could easily be "stealth" but most of the time I tell people I'm trans, as long as I feel safe doing so. My view of the world is so fundamentally shaped by the way I view sexuality and gender that it always seems to make its way into my conversations with people.
I recently had a conversation with a 60 year old woman who is in a public speaking class with me, and she was talking about how she rushed into a relationship during the pandemic and came to regret it. This is a straight woman who has very little knowledge of the queer community, but she was respectful and open to conversation, so I said "theres this concept in queer theory that i think you might resonate with called 'compulsory heterosexuality'." Once I explained it, she immediately agreed with the idea, and we talked about how the expectations of women to always be in a relationship with a man hurt not just queer women, but ALL women.
I talk about being transgender because I want people to reflect on their own relationship with gender and the effect that being shoved into a category with ridiculous amd contradictory expectations has had on who they are. I want to show people how society's rigid ideas of binary sex and gender hurt everyone, because no one fits into those categories. Trans people are not an exception to a rule, we are proof that the rule should not exist in the first place.
Beautiful anecdote, thank you for sharing! Im still figuring out my identity (I guess we always are on some level) but I've grown up being percieved as a Cis man. Its so strangling to interact with societal standards you absolutely loathe. I feel a lot of people in general feel pressured to be in a relationship, it always makes me feel a little uncomfortable seeing people (even myself at times) longing for connection but forcing themselves to contextualise it as a relationship, especially a hetero one. I think this all adds up to why theres so many problems with perception of dating and relationships, because people dont have the tools to navigate their own social lives. Add in us as a society starting to unpack years of toxic expectations and social norms and it leads to a lot of paranoia and confusion, and a lot of just hurt all around for everyone. Then on top of that you have social media and bad actors who genuinely do want to push others down and hurt them and its all just so overwhelming.
There’s a quote from Gender Outlaw that’s something like “who is transsexual? Whoever admits it”. (Because nobody fits into the gender boxes, everyone is dissatisfied with the gender system; some people just have higher levels of and/or lower tolerance for that dissatisfaction than others.)
No you are a person suffering from a dangerous delusion
compulsory heterosexuality is completely not about "you might not be straight" but the sexual oppression of women to be socially pressured into relationships with men on any level for security due to them not being ever recognized as full humans in the face of societies throughout the ages. This has nothing to do with gender and everything to do with the sexual oppression of women as a SEX. AKA sexism. Trans people have little to do with this concept, and seems more like a symptom to the oppression as a means to escape it.
@@carmabis432 the way you completely ignored the entire point of the comment just to be transphobic is really impressive. take a good hard look at yourself and grow, if you can.
'Most trans people I know can't even order extra water at a restaurant' haha dang you didn't have to call us out like that
i don't get the joke, care to explain it for me?
@@sashyf We tend to have social anxiety
@@ryn2844 oh, is that like something trans people just have naturally or??
@@sashyf No, social anxiety is generally the result of a lifetime of rejection, sadly.
@@ryn2844 oh, yea that makes sense, sad!
As a nonbinary person who considers myself genderless this is so comforting to hear. I always say I feel like I’m me irrespective of my body but I recognize that I am female in society it always weirds people out that I “accept” that. As someone who has my degree and has done research in biology, I look at sex as no different than any other genetic mutation. It was what was needed for our species survival. Me being born female is no different than me being born a few inches shorter than my siblings. It was what I won in the genetic lottery. However, I realize even though I feel (and the people around me feel) that my body is genderless it won’t change that fact that in my life time my body will mostly be seen as female and have social expectations that comes along with it. I always say I’m trans only because we live in a society that forces us to reject nuance.
i'm so intrigued by the idea of sex as a mutation that evolved simply bc it was enough of a survival aid to merit passing on. makes me consider the vast sexual variations of animals and how those are often very specifically adapted to their ecological niches. why shouldn't the same apply to humans? thanks for the food for thought!
I'm amab agender and your comment put into words a lot of my own thoughts. I feel so seen right now
Much love to you 💜
@@alexba1leysex quite litterally is just a genetic mutation. All genetic traits we have come from genetic mutations. Green eyes, brown eyes, having eyebrows, standing on two legs. The very first creatures reproduced asexually and therefore, didnt have sexes. Even some species that do have sexes, dont have sexual dimorphism so you cant even visually tell the sexes apart. Humans just had mutations that resulted in 2 distinct sexes (and of course intersex).
Alexander bro, thank you. I am not aware of any transperson being in my life, but with your efforts I have significant background on both the history of sex, gender and the humanity that exists within us all - cis or trans. I know in my heart that to reject those who are trans is to reject our humanity itself - a silly, ignorant practice of self hatred in the interest of preserving egos formed within a system ruled by those who "have" wanting to have even more. Now I have more words to express that sentiment.
Too many cis people have conversations amongst themselves deciding what being transgender means without a clue of how life is if they'd place themselves in your shoes AND without any significant effort to gain the ability to do so. You provide quality content that I can confidently share - and what little excuse there was to be in a state of ignorance ceases to exist. You've done the work for us.
Also the backdoor sex jokes 🤌
trauma as a cause for any gender or sexuality is a really interesting idea. i think cis men probably could relate to that idea if theyre open to the idea that bullying causes trauma. men are often bullied into manhood. that kind of trauma makes a man more set in masculinity. sexual assault works to subjugate women and force them to understand their "place" in society. that kind of trauma can make women more set in femininity as well.
Isn't there an entire subset of asexual people that started to identify with the term due to a traumatic experience involving sex?
@@airplanes_aren.t_realyup
@@airplanes_aren.t_realdefinitely, not me personally but that’s a pretty major contributing factor.
@@airplanes_aren.t_real I hate that this has become a stereotype. I'm ace. I have sexual trauma. My trauma has never impacted my inability to feel sexual attraction in any way.
@@wintergray1221 I think it's because it's the easiest way people can rationalize this sexuality (not say they should do that just that they do)
It's much easier to think
Trauma can make a person not like something->people can have trauma from Sexual assault-> asexuality
That's the same root problem of the whole "born this way" thing, it aims to rationalize instead of acknowledge or inform
Ill die happy now knowing that a portion of the Ancient greek population wished mpreg was real
On that note, Plato (at least in his youth) thought that gay men were meant to be rulers because they are more masculine in nature
@@kc8391what is manlier than loving a man?
The has been a big return of catamites too!
@@kc8391 are they not? nothings more masculine than TWO MEN. ITS DOUBLE THE MAN
tag this for SPOILERS PLEASE WHOA
great video essay!!! just a note, there’s a history of necessity to the “born in the wrong body” narrative - it’s not just that it was a convenient way to describe ourselves to cis people, but it was the kind of keyword that trans people (mostly women) knew they had to use to access transition care in the late 20th century, like you discuss from your own experience at the beginning. Julia Serano outlines this history in Whipping Girl!
When you ban something except for exceptions the exceptions become the norm
“Sneed’s Feed and Seed: Formerly Chuck’s”
Me: haha it’s funny because “Chuck’s Feed and Seed didn’t rhyme. Sneed just happened to buy the business”
Moments later: … oh
Sneeders unite!
It's Chuck's Seeduck and Feeduck
bruh same D: we're too innocent
@@Lollero200q perhaps Chuck sold duck feed
@@ZombieInvader yes
Sleep was invented as a torture device keeping me from watching this video
Oh no, but research shows that, generally speaking, people don't like torture!
"what happens when we assume that nature has a purpose" is a crazy bar
me: yeah, i need to study for my 4year exam from "the knowledge of society"
*alexander avila posts"
me: well this counts as studying, no?
I consider him to be a gender/sexuality lecturer. So, absolutely.
powodzenia na maturce
@@arej5390 dziena, przyda się
😭
Lmaooo sameee, saw the notification in the morning and now that it's my break I'm watching it
guys the essay i had to write was a speech about social exclusion, watching all of these video essays finaly payed off 😭❤️
As a trans non-binary person that doesn't fit any of the popular boxes, I've been long dissatisfied with the way as you said sex and gender are locked in a cage. I find it hard to put into words just how dehumanizing it feels for not only my falling out of the norm to be pathologised but many of my gender identity related wants and needs to be completely dismissed as not even being gender related. As if others could objectively decide that for me.
It’s hard to exist outside of the boxes when people are already mad enough over the ones just trying to swap one cage for another
it seems like the only way out is through, thanks for bending that cage, may we build a world that does not hurt, you or otherwise
@@Shoulderpads-mcgee people are just so mad in general. you have to 'fit' or you're a target.
Biological sex has no time for your flouncing.
sexuality is a prison (luckily i was never in it to start), though im not too sure if the bars of gender surround me or are in front of me.
every video this dude makes really amazes me. i've only been following for a few months, but the content, the comedy, the production value, the aesthetic material, everything is WAYYY too good for the subscriber count.
@@cyclicozone2072how many comments am i gonna find u under doing this same little basic transphobic statement. ur actually so funny, it brightens my day to know ppl like u hav seriously nothing fucking better to do, like wow, it’s pathetic in such a funny way. i’m sorry u don’t like the boy in the video but i don’t think calling him a girl 500 times is gonna hurt his feelings or change anyone’s minds silly
@@cyclicozone2072What you are doing is considered spam so I will report you for it. Over a 100 comments… Get a life, instead of getting yourself angry on TH-cam.
@cyclicozone2072 I used to be insecure about transitioning late in life, but if someone this manly can be called a lady, i guess I have nothing to worry about, I'll go out and be the best woman I can.
Thanks for the self esteem boost!
"Anatomy has existed since Greeks were taking it up the a-" I'M HOWLING!!
Love how he then says the same about Romans lmaooo
@UTTP-142Alex doesn't make millions to begin with lmfao
The greeks took it the wrong way and needed to know how it worked, what is a group of CLOSE MALE FRIENDS to do?
As a GP in training this was incredibly useful to listen to. The current medical establishment is unapologetically and unilaterally supporting the Cass report. It is all in the name of “protecting children”. But at no point do they even acknowledge that trans children could even be real. They show incredibly little insight into how trans people experience reality or their own medicalisation.
This felt like a much more honest and empathetic take on trans healthcare than entire medical journals. Thank you.
You being in the medical field is an absolute disgrace.
Maybe you should trust the experts!
Thank you for doing this study as part of becoming a well rouunded doctor. Too feww do.
Alexander: Pretend you're a horse girl
Me: Way ahead of you
i completely agree...the narrative that sex and gender are separate and that trans people have the brain of the gender they feel they are has always bothered me. gender is just extremely complex and a personal connection to the world which doesn't have to make sense, because nature doesn't really have a purpose. i'm genderfluid and i've always seen my connection to gender more weird and complicated than the way people simplify it whether that be with transphobic intentions or activism intentions
Yeah, I often find myself thinking into tangled spirals when I try to really think through that model. It just doesn’t quite fit the puzzle it’s trying to solve. The lines of everything are too blurry to have that distinction and you can’t truly know who you are outside of the culture that influenced you.
I really liked Alex’s discussion of experience and trauma influencing gender. I identify as nonbinary but sometimes I’ve felt like a fraud because I don’t fit into any of the popular narratives of what that means, and I think my feelings about gender are strongly linked to my asexuality. And I thought if my gender is caused by my sexuality, it must be fake because I don’t feel like I have a nonbinary brain, I feel like an asexual who is distanced from my assigned gender because of it
@@Shoulderpads-mcgee I am also on the asexual side of things and I think I would actually identify with being agender which because it isn't apart of a binary I would also consider non-binary or if you were to say I had to have a gender I would say that I am my own gender, I literally have never cared at all what my gender is or even what my sex is because there were more interesting things to talk about. From my view everything we talk about is a social construct because we socially construct these barriers between things that don't actually exist, although certain barriers are more useful constructions to talk about how and why things work. I even recognize that had I gone through even a slightly different life up until this point I could likely be a hugely different person. I use the pronouns of he/him because that is what I am used to and don't see a reason to change it. I do find it interesting to relate to other people on issues like this though because not only do I find it satisfying to some degree but because it might help someone else figure something out.
for me, when i first heard about transness around age 12-13, the brain vs body thing made sense, and was even something that kind of resonated with me, but as soon as i learned that "male" and "female" brains don't exist, maybe a year or two later, it became that much more complex and interesting. i LOVE that it isn't as simple as a mismatch between the mind and the body. it made my journey exploring my gender and sex that much clearer. i wasn't cis, and i wasn't a tomboy. in my mind i am very feminine in how i feel, but never a girl, and never a woman. and finally recognizing gender dysphoria in myself was the moment i allowed myself gender affirming care. it's all so complex, and that's what makes it interesting, worthy of exploring, human. why is every difference pathologized and demonized instead of explored and supported? well, bc humans naturally fear the unknown, but as soon as you explore it, it's no longer unknown, so why recoil and try to destroy it instead of exploring it in a safe environment with open arms?
It is about a brain body mismatch. The mismatch is what causes dysphoria. And if you don't have dysphoria, you aren't trans th-cam.com/video/8QScpDGqwsQ/w-d-xo.html
The 'gendered brain' thing to me feels like an extension of transmedicalism. If I, a trans woman, went to a doctor and got my brain scanned, and it turned out I had a 'male brain', would that immediately invalidate my transness? Transmeds are already constantly putting down trans people who don't fit their very specific definition of transness, and ideas like having the 'wrong brain' or being born in the 'wrong body', while they may apply to many trans folks, should not be used to define transness as a whole.
My day has been really off and really scary, I'm going in for my first try at kind of the last effort to get my mental health on track. Within 2 hours, ketamine will be coursing through my veins, and I'm nervous. And even though that experience and this comment have nothing to do with this video or its content, I just wanted to say that if there's anything that could bring me some comfort no matter which way it goes today, it's going to be watching this video when I get home. I'm so grateful.
🫂
Hey there! I am here to tell you that you don’t need to be nervous. I’m on Spravado and have had an injection treatment before too. You will be 100% fine and odds are your depression will get better. I’ll see you on the other side!
Ketamine treatments have changed my life for the better. I'm hoping they will for you too!
I'm envious. I think this treatment has been proven to be very effective. Good choice. I believe you feel immediately better after. Good luck to you. Don't worry.
@@rosshowarth3266 I also thought you feel immediately better afterward. In retrospect I realized that's very foolish. You don't just magically make decades of trauma disappear. You have to feel it.
This video really really means a lot to me.
I've grown up in Florida and been here most of my life surrounded by conservatives and pushed down upon by my hard republican parents, forced to conform to their idea of "masculinity" forced to play sports, make friends, give up things I liked that weren't traditionally masculine, art, collecting stuffed animals, and playing pretend.
For awhile I was headed down the path they wanted me too, until I found the internet specifically discord. After Years and years of roleplaying, meeting people and making art on discord I found out more and more about queer people and trans people, I started to question myself.
"Am I straight?"
"Is there a reason I've never had a crush?"
"Am I even cis gender???"
And finally, within the last month I've come to the conclusion that I wanted to be a trans women after trying out she/her for a few weeks and it just feeling right for me.
Still finding myself and deathly afraid of my parents but this spectacular video really has shone me, and reinforced my decision.
Thank you so much for making this.
Succumbing to outside pressure is an issue with strength of character. Funny that you don't realise just how rigid and regressively sexist the ideas of "gender identity" within the T movement are, wholly reliant on validating and perpetuating sexist stereotypes themselves.
@@ambientjohnny Johnny, if you cannot perceive the cruelty of your words here, I think you might do well to take a serious look at yourself.
You are correct about one thing though. To resist pressure from parents, media, government and society requires incredible inner strength. It takes time and patience to discover what kind of person you wish to be and how to actively bring your unique and authentic self to bear upon the world. Men can passively adopt the role they have been given, or they can decide for themselves what kind of man they wish to be. The same goes for women and enbies.
@dragonfang481 You have that kind of incredible inner strength. Given time, you will figure out what kind of woman you want to be. Perhaps you will find yourself fitting comfortably within some of the more commonly held categories, or perhaps you'll find it feels correct to present more unconventionally. Perhaps your ideas and feelings and expression will change over time, subtly or drastically. Among many other things, modern intersectional feminism is about allowing every woman the freedom and safety to be the kind of woman she wants to be. In a just world, you will have that freedom and safety. Good luck.
@joanmoriarity8738 thank you so much for your kind words, they mean the world, for many years I've been living under my parents being what they wanted, giving in because I thought I had to, and even if still my parents won't support me doing this, I know I don't need their support and that I need to focus on myself, my mental health and what makes me happy.
It's so nice to know I'll be accepted out there, with support of friends who truly care about me and want me to be me, I can be strong and find out what I want to be, man, woman, hell even intersex, I have a lot of self discovery to do before I really figure myself out and for now she/her is working for me.
And again thank you
I can’t get over the Cass Report using AI generated images. Nothing supports your totally 100% scientifically sound report like incorporating images of people who literally do not exist.
Yeah fucking hell
@@albertfralinger2711 it's one of many pieces of evidence that trans voices were not included in the report. it suggests the report's authors view us as... less real than themselves. and easily replaced.
@@albertfralinger2711 is this a hot new "keanu reeves does not exist" conspiracy theory i smell
@@albertfralinger2711 Not the exact same issue but it would absolutely still be _an_ issue to criticize.
@@albertfralinger2711If they had evidence of what they were claiming, they wouldn’t need to use AI images. But they didn’t.
1:14:06 "We only pathologize this incongruence when a trans person experiences it. To long for your gendered assignment is a virtue, but to long for another assignment is a sin."
1:15:46 "Why do we medicalize and pathologize certain relationships to gender, and not others?"
It really is so arbitrary.
Eh
While still listening: I've been bursting into laughter with pure joy and fun every now and then. Not only is this very interesting and well put, but also entertaining af
It's true, Alexander sold me a (quite a high quality rip) copy of Romi and Michelle's High School Reunion for $7 outside of a Dollar Tree in Sunnyvale, CA.
Okay the Dean Pelton / Michel Focoult was a joke that you created specifically for me and I just want you to know that I deeply appreciated it.
streets ahead
me too. I laughed tears.
Finally someone is saying it, we should ban puberty
@@cyclicozone2072 indeed
@@cyclicozone2072, said the obsessive anti-trans ideologue.
@@cyclicozone2072 oh the irony when you adhere to objectively the most unhinged, conspiratorial, delusional ideology currently infecting the western world. Anti-trans ideologues give flat earthers and Scientologists a run of their money (and overlap with them quite a bit).
“Damn these newfangled hormones! Back in Neverland we never aged, like god intended!”
I wish mine was banned too. Fxck puberty!
I am trying to get a mastectomy and its so hard. My parents insurance would normally cover it, but doesn’t because its through a religious organization. I am also on state medicaid. Which may or may not cover it. I can’t afford the 10,000+ surgery. I hate that this stuff is considered not essential healthcare
Are you at high risk of breast cancer? Or is because you've been groomed into thinking it's a wonderful idea?
the thumbnail is just: Alexander and a nightmare blunt rotation
Your vids always hit me hard at some point even though I think I know where we’re going and assume I know most of what we’re going to cover/are on the same page/have heard most of this before being a well researched person who is quite a bit your senior. Yet at some point I’m always struck by your intense insight on the subject and really so glad you’ve dedicated your mind and time to this career and I’ve been fortunate enough to hear your words.
You deeply contribute to an intellectual path forward in this world and we all benefit that your mind is being immortalized on a public platform.
I hope you are backing everything up somewhere in case TH-cam goes bust some day so these can all be reposted elsewhere bc this is an archive for the ages like quality literature, truly.
In general nature defies simple and exact categorization. Even laws of physics aren't exact categories but understandable models. Newtonian mechanics, force = mass x acceleration, etc. is in fact an aberration itself, "only" applying to masses larger than quantum size and speeds lower than that of light. Not to mention gravitational distortion of time, etc. In biology we have all the different kingdoms of life, where fungi used to be considered vegetation and rocks used to be considered life forms.
Not only that, but anyone who studies phylogenesis knows that there is no exact moment/boundary when one species evolves into another.
Reminds me of the famous "I cannot teach you about mushrooms" tumblr post.
I love this line of argumentation because while we've become so used to desperately trying to stick everything into some sort of category or box (in order to understand and/or to feel superior) it just doesn't work like that. I know people generally like certainty but really, nothing is certain or final and I wish that thought would just permeate culture more. Things can be, but they don't have to. We may know but we may not. All that is left is our attempt to be kind to each other and get along.
Looking into cladistics is really interesting and definitely in line with all this. You grow up thinking you can easily sort animals into mammals, amphibians, reptiles, birds, and fish, but looking deeper into the relationships between organisms makes it clear that that’s reductive. Birds turn out to be a type of reptile, and fish becomes a useless category full of animals that are nothing alike.
It really mirrors all the people going on about “basic biology,” but that’s just it, they only know basic biology because they never dig into it. They understand sex and gender at the basic level of chromosomes the same way a child understands animals by those simple and reductive categories.
But nothing is ever that simple. Trans people exist, intersex people exist, and the platypus is a mammal who lays eggs. Whenever you write a rule, there will be an exception that defies it.
Thanks for this. I've been more and more frustrated with the way trans people and gender and sex are presented even in leftist spaces, despite understanding where they were coming from. I also took classes about gender and languages studies last semester and I asked a lot of questions regarding stuff you talk about in this video (especially at the end), but I never felt satisfied with the answers I was given. This video felt very satisfying though, and even made me cry because getting answers that make sense from someone who has the same way of thinking of gender and sex as me but is also trans is something I hadn't had before. Anyway, now I really wanna read Preciado and Foucault.
"americans support trans people in practice just not in theory" is literally so real tho, 90% of the transphobia I've ever experienced was from disapproving strangers in public spaces glaring at the sight of me being so gender-nonconforming (huge honkers and rogaine beard), but in every instance of introducing myself to new coworkers or classmates, people i would have to interact with for more than 2 seconds of eye contact, they were always very respectful and made a pointed effort to get my pronouns right, even when I was usually the first trans person they'd ever met.
Its interesting to see this after recently being told I couldn't use my preferred name and pronouns. It feels nice to see so many people who feel the same or similarly. Makes me feel less crazy.
Cis people get to change their names all the time, you should be allowed to use the name that is right for you. Definitely not crazy.
As a Brit, I can confirm. "NICE" is good quality evidence that we're not a real country.
I definitely was the one nervously nodding haha. This video was very insightful and really opened my perspectice.
Apart from that, the editing, lighting, artistic direction and even the jokes were all on point! Amazing video!
I've gotten to 55 minutes in and it completely recontextualises the "swing back" I am seeing within the trans community. The growing rejection of the idea "trans people change gender, not sex" and instead the standing of our ground on the concept of "many of us do change, fundamentally, our sex. We change so many fundamental traits that build into what's called 'sex' that the only correct way to describe it is that we change sex."
The understanding that we're not changing a concept that we put forwards in the first place is important. That we're only working with whatever is publicly digestible at the time, and of course many of us disagree with the definition of what we are, because it was defined *for* us, not by us. Arguing that we work with gender, not sex, is an idea sold that we just nod along with. And frankly, right now, it's obvious that gender is being used to wrap us up into a conceptual bubble removed from anything else, to be popped when opponents feel it's ready, to leave us seeming to be conceptually ungrounded from reality. And that's what the anti-trans movement are trying to do right now, they try to get us to defend something we don't even hold as true.They've argued that we deal with gender, not sex, and now they argue that gender doesn't exist, actually. Which, is always doomed to fail, because regardless of concepts, we still exist, and if 'gender' is popped, our existence must and will be recontextualised. And we will be 'back' to arguing that sex isn't binary, actually, and we are altering our sex. They don't win, they just force a language change on an existence they can't just argue away.
You are the ones screaming at us that sex and gender are different while at the same time conflate gender and sex all the time. Not us. We don't believe in what you currently call "gender identity" or "gender" nowaday and we know sex is immutable, we never doubted that. We used the pronouns you wanted and acted like you are the sex you pretended to be out of kindness, we didn't actually believe you are that sex and we didn't believe you are some "gender" because we don't believe in this incoherent definition of gender, whatever it is. We were just being kind because we thought you have some psychological condition that makes you feel like the other sex, and we thought you are suffering because of it. No one believes "trans women" are women, no one. We just pretended for your sake. Then you decided to cross all lines, violate our rights and poison science and law with this demented belief of yours, with many young people falling victim to this crazy notion of "gender identity", mutilating thier body, putting themselves on a constant state of hormonal imbalance, agonizing over the fact that their body don't fit whatever "gender" they think they are, and we are done. We are done.
People who felt connected more to the other sex have always existed, what is called "gender nonconforming people" have always existed, at least since civilization, I presume. But "trans" is a very modern invention and "trans" as it is defined now just came about 20 years ago, pushed on by millionaires, perverts and trans activists. Science doesn't actually prove any of that and it's not something that developed organically. It's just a frame of thinking pushed by people with an agenda. And you are most likely a victim of it.
Male and female marijuana plants exist. So what do a male marijuana plant, a male insect, and a male stockbroker have in common? Gamete size. Transition cannot change that.
@@XxYwise it's difficult to focus on what you're trying to say when you've listed 3 sources with 3 different gamete sizes.
And also irrelevant to even consider gametes here. Noone judges anyone else by their individual gamete size. Speaking of which, for many trans people, gamete size is infinitely small. a big, huge, zero. It does not matter what gamete size is produced because we aren't.
Oh, and it's not good optics that you're reducing the worth of people down to something that small, and effectively classing a whole group of *people* by a biological function. A woman is worth so, so much more than her capacity to incubate an egg.
autistic people have been debating for a while now why people on the spectrum are far more likely to identify as nonbinary/gnc than non autistics. obviously we don't know the exact answer, but the theory i think makes the most sense is that we simply don't really understand the complex systems and societal norms that dictate what gender is. everyone seems to know what "maleness" or "femaleness" is but no one can point to one thing i can make sense of.
Even to the extent that "autigender" is a thing. My concept of gender is inextricable from my autism; social norms of gender are so tied up in neurotypical relationships to society that I don't think I could have been cisgender no matter what gender I was assigned.
+
"Everyone seems to know what 'maleness' and 'femaleness' are" only until you expand the definition of "everyone" to include all humans past and present from all societies.
"Everyone knows" is often, especially as used by conservative commentators, a reskin of "God's command". Everyone *doesn't* have the same ideas of how a man should look, and those ideas continuously evolve. Ideas of femininity are a byproduct of male competition: female beauty is valuable only insofar as it confers status on the man with sexual access to it. So no, everyone *doesn't* know what maleness and femaleness are because those are continuously constructed cultural categories. "Everyone" only knows these things if by "everyone" you only mean white middle class Westerners. It's an inherently colonialist reduction which forces one culture's ideas of femininity and masculinity onto everyone else. Bumble, an American made dating app, uses the fact that the women initiate flirting as a selling point, but that's just how flirting is expected to work in Chinese dramas (and therefore presumably in Chinese culture). "Everyone" in America would agree that an essential characteristic of men is romantic boldness, but gotta be the person who points out that the average human is not American. Millions upon millions of people, don't think that's an essential characteristic of men so one can't say that "everyone" knows what a man is. We can also read things written by people from the past, which contain very different notions of what constitutes masculinity and femininity. So, these are not fact-based categories but rather evolving cultural constructs.
Neurotypical people seem to be able to disregard what they can observe with their own senses, if pressured by social and financial incentives. People don't hate because it's fun, they do it because their status within society is threatened. However, as someone on the autism spectrum I lack the capability to be willfully ignorant. I can be misinformed, and I might believe misinformation strongly enough to be skeptical of a counterclaim. I might even be afraid of what a certain fact means about my social position. But, I can't simply ignore a fact regardless of how inconvenient it might be. It was always obvious to me that masculinity and femininity were cultural constructs, purely from the fact that I knew gendered expectations were different in different places and different eras. I knew that long before I knew words like "transgender" or "nonbinary".
I'm genderfluid and suck at socializing with everyone. Seems legit.
Mood, I'm an autistic woman, but I still value my masculinity and want to be strong while also still being a woman who isn't butch. It's all so confusing.
It is an exaggeration to say that cis gendered people find it easy to get hormones and all communities should support one another to fight for their human rights to healthcare. UK study found women waiting nearly 9 years for endometriosis diagnosis, let alone treatment waiting times. I am on a 1yr 1mo wait list for this in the UK and it took 5 years to get my hormones sorted out for infertility.
I lost it at "fake and gay" this video is so great you're super talented
I feel like this video was made for me specifically. I've spent a lot of time trying to understand and articulate the relationship between words, concepts, social constructs, and gender. You've managed to fill in so many of the gaps for me. The explicit knowledge that the construct of gender came from eugenic biologists in order to continue the idea of the binary explains SO MUCH, and I just... dang freakin' words, idk, I just know it's something I'm going to be mulling over for a long time.
I'm going to watch this later, but, having recognized all the people in the thumbnail, I feel obligated to sit on my lawn for a little while
"gender trouble" sounds like an awesome bandname for bands made from trans people
I know a trans girl who had her second appointment with the gender clinic two days ago. She’s 14. They made silly jokes about the doctors saying they have 2 extra balls (hilarious, Luna, well done) and it’s possible that she could get on puberty blockers in around 6 months. But they won’t get access to estrogen until at least 16- and even then, only gets a consult with a doctor. Basically, this is how real trans kids live. They’re giggly nerds who say ‘that’s what she said’ and go to school.
Breaking news, trans girls are just like you
Your friend is an experiment.
Poor kid. No one around to actually show real compassion but happy to push him to castrate himself. Bravo! You are a true progressive and a true friend.
And that really shows how prepared they are to make medical choices with long term life changing consequences. 👍
She's lucky. In America where I live we can't even get on puberty blockers until we're 18
Damn Alexander this is just amazing *standing ovation. The arguments, the style, the color grading, the backgrounds, the fonts, damn... everything, even the examples, don't know what to tell you haha I just want you to know that your artistry is appreciated... the aspect ratio! *chef's kiss man, greetings from Ecuador ✌
Yeah she’s really deluded
So happy to see another video from the channel! Hope you’re doing well!
P.S. Please ban puberty. It was horrible.
Not sure about good intentions....at all. Cass was also in talks with DeSantis over his gender healthcare ban and has history with gender criticals sooooo
Gender criticals have good intentions: protecting kids from being harmed for profit on the basis of piss-poor evidence.
I think just like your triangle analogy we are in fact "born this way", each our own distinct shapes. We just then learn to categorize ourselves into boxes through our society and but also our limiting languages. The first part we do not control; the second part we also hardly can control. Though we certainly do change and evolve over time, both what we are and how we think of ourselves and others.
I saw 'Michel Foucault' and thought 'Isn't that the guy from Community?' then looked up what Foucault looked like and wow that's close.
😭😭
lmao same
Maybe it’s my asexuality, but I never got the Sneed’s Feed and Seed innuendo until now. I always thought it was just that the prior name was Chuck’s Feed and Seed, and that the new owner’s name was a happy coincidence.
I just wanted to give ya a big BIG thanks for putting in the effort of creating accurate captions, even after working so hard on the video and audio itself.
"pretend you're a horse girl"
ok
"you're reading pre-9th century texts about the natural history of horses"
o-oh, whoops >_>
uwu and owo
@@wintergray1221price and money
Y'all how do I share TH-cam videos with my extended family who I never talk about "politics" with?
Send them the link, and ask them to watch. Then, absolve yourself of the responsibility of educating them.
I know it can feel like "if not me, then who?" It can be exhausting and traumatic to argue for your right to exist. And it's okay to not engage. You are not the sole pillar on which their salvation rests.
I did not get the Sneed's Feed & Seed, i read 'formerly Chuck's' and thought Chuck's was the entirety of the former name 💀
the fact that you uploaded this right after i finished a a research essay on the historical interplay between feminism, queer theory, and trans theory for one of my classes (i was arguing that terfs were anti-feminist by being anti-trans) is just fun timing, i get to go into this for once with some theoretical knowledge of what's behind the curtain
I'm about a fifth of the way into the video, but i'll just say before continuing to watch that I something i found surprising in my research was that a lot of the sex/gender distinction theory work did not come from the queer side of things, it came from feminism. Women had been working to distinguish sex from gender for the political reasons of saying there was no physical basis that women were less than men, no physical basis for confining gender roles. Judith Butler's "gender is a performance" theory wasn't even that out there by feminist standards, third wave feminist theory was full of people trying to come up with a new model to understand gender through a social lens instead of an inherent one, with ideas such as "gender is defined by how it relates to other genders" or "gender is the realization of historical possibilities"
By contrast, trans theory did come from the queer side of things, and it caused a lot of issues with the feminists. Queer theory was heavily medicalized, because queer identities were seen as mental illness and they had the political goals of challenging that. So trans theory comes onto the stage using this medicalized language, and the feminists hate it, because it reduces gender back to a physical reality rather than a social one. Meanwhile trans folk have issues with the feminists because, well, they're being treated like trans theory is an illness rather than a discussion filled with critical thought. Trans theory quickly adopts a lot of feminist theory, but the initial interactions were really rough because of these issues and some feminists never moved past it
also trans theory has been described as "the evil twin of queer theory", which is just marvelously funny, along with the fact that lesbian feminists are both the source of the most intense transphobia in feminist spaces (historical radfems --> modern terfs) and a major source for trans acceptance. I cannot get over how much of feminist views on trans theory, good or bad, always came back to the lesbians
This really fascinates me considering how terf ideology is extremely medicalized and biological, with radical feminists putting so much stock into female anatomy (the creepy vagina cult is a nickname that amuses me) and biological difference. The intense hatred of trans people feels like feminism has been set back so that instead of insisting men and women aren’t particularly biologically different, the narrative has become women are frail and weak and need to have protecting against the hulking and predatory male human. I hate it and it’s bioessentialism immensely.
Love this synopsis! Also always worth mentioning that there has been quite a schism in the historical radfems over precisely trans rights. Cornerstone radfems have vocally fallen out over it. We hear most about the terfs of course, but some really major names oppose(d) them. Catharine MacKinnon comes to mind, as does Andrea Dworkin (if MacKinnon and Dworkin's widower, activist John Stoltenberg, are reliable sources, which I think they are).
@@edn2674 terf litterally stands for "trans exclusionary radical feminist", it is impossible to be a terf without being transphobic, idk enough about radfems that aren't terfs to say but based on the other reply to this comment its possible to be a radfem without being teansphobic, but yeah if you dont consider trans women women or want to exclude them from "female" spaces then thats transphobia. I get the want to have a women-only space, i read a whole paper talking about the history of that desire and the formation of radfems as a group, but defining it as "female-only" isn't doing that and is, in fact, really reductive of about 50 years worth of feminist history working to seperate the definition of "woman" from the definition of "female". To qoute a famous feminist whose name i cant remember rn just google the qoute, "you are not born a woman, you become a woman", this is true for every single woman on earth, cis or trans, being a woman isn't a physical reality it's a social reality.
To illustrate this better for you, imagine having trans men in your "female-only" spaces. Google trans men and look at them and think about that. They're biologically female, so they should be welcome in "female-only" spaces, right? But i got a feel that having men with beards and the like in that space isn't what you're going for
@@edn2674 okay so, i feel a little like communication might be breaking down? might be my fault, i'm bad with tone, but ima continue to try to keep a friendly debate tone and assume good faith on your end and hope you can assume good faith on mine
so like, let me start by telling a story. I have a younger brother, he's younger than me by about two years, and when we were little he had a habit of running around the house without a shirt on. Because I was also little, one morning I attempted to do the same, but my dad immediately caught me and told me that I couldn't be doing that, and when i asked why i couldn't when my brother could, he didn't really have a good answer for me. this was way pre-puberty, so there really wasn't a physical difference between my chest and my brother's, the only difference between us was that i was a girl and my brother was a boy. because i was a girl, and only because i was a girl, my chest was deemed inappropiate, when though it was physically the same as my brother's, because again, this was way pre-puberty for both of us.
this is what i mean when i say there's 50 years of feminist separating sex from gender. Yes, there are physical realtities of the body, but those physical realities don't come with social realities. We, as societies and cultures, apply social realities to those physical realities. When i bring up that "you are not born a woman, you become a woman," qoute, i am explicitly talking about that experience that you describe of growing up in systems that aren't made for you and experiencing hardships and abuse because of it. There is nothing about these systems that are inherent to having a vagina, people made these systems by projecting them onto having a vagina or not.
To put this in the historical perspective, i think it's fairly well-known that a lot of historical works view women as lesser, not just worth less but less capable of tasks than men were, less intelligent, weaker, etc. Feminists spent years challenging this, they spent years arguing that just because you're born with a vagina doesn't mean that you're less intelligent or less physically capable than someone born with a penis, these were all just social expectations being projected onto the physical body.
as a kid, i was not aware that my chest was considered sexual. I did not become aware that my chest, as a girl, was considered sexual and inappropriate until that day when my dad stopped me from running around without a shirt. The body does not come with labels, we apply those to it later. This is what "becoming a woman" means, its the process that society that applies to people born with the female sex that shapes them socially into women.
As for trans folk, I don't think we should ignore physical realities either! in fact, the discussion is made much richer by taking those realities and lived social experiences into account. For instance, there's plenty of trans women who talk about the experience of losing male privilege as they start to be able to pass, and the emotional and social experience of that, of having tasks that you previously had been accepted as competent at being questioned, even though nothing about you changed except for your gender presentation. I remember reading a post from a trans man who talked about how they were very emotional and empathic since childhood, and when they were seen as a girl that was encouraged, that was seen as a positive, but the second they came out as a man, the expectations shifted, and suddenly being emotional was a bad thing and they were being expected to be less emotional, less empathic. These are the same people, with the same bodies even, but changing their gender presentation changed how people think about and treat them. If these things were truly inherent to the physical body, then why did they change? It sorta reveals how inherently fluid gender and gender roles are when changing your presentation suddenly changes the entire way the world interacts with and sees you.
(also, side note, cis women do experience gender dysphoria. Off the top of my head, lesbians or promiscuous women tend to struggle with feelings of being "too masculine" due to their sexuality and the social expectations thereof, women who have undergone mastectomy tend to struggle with what they feel as a loss of femininity, there's an entire field of commerce called make-up and cosmetic surgery that exists, in part, because of women feeling like their body doesn't match who they are inside and trying to fix that, gender dysphoria isn't just a trans thing)
(men also experience gender dysphoria too, thought it important to note, just think of any of the ways men feel it necessary to reaffirm their masculinity)
I will give you points for the trans men thing, at least you're consistent with that, and i appreciate you taking the time to say we shouldn't exclude masculine women. That said, your inclusion of them in your "female-only" spaces speaks to my real issue with the term. by defining a space as "female-only", then excluding transwomen but including transmen, it somewhat reveals that you don't think of them as "real" women or "real" men. It reveals, inherently, that you think of transwomen as "men acting as women" instead of as women in their own right, and you think of transmen as "women acting as men" instead of men in their own right. I am aware that the use of "female" in "female-only spaces" is being used as a substitute term for women, and you confirm it yourself by immediately comparing transmen to gender-nonconforming women instead of acknowledging them as men. Your goal is not to create a "female-only" space, your goal is to create a "women-only space", but you are defining a woman by their biological sex, which means the inclusion of transmen and exclusion of transwomen inherently means that you do not respect their gender identities, you do not think of them as real men and women.
I'll end by saying, again, I understand the want for a space for women only. There is something to be said about solidarity and community, and I can get the appeal, but defining a space as "female-only" does not do that. Feminists have, for years, worked to show that the biological sex has almost none of the effects that we subscribe to it, and that those effects are instead social realities we've projected onto biological sex. Continuing to define women by whether or not they were born with a vagina is reductive and honestly? a little insulting to women, I know I am more than my physical sex, I am an agent in deciding my own gender presentation and how i interact with societies expectations for me, and reducing that down to my physical body is deeply insulting. I don't want my definition of womanhood to hinge on what's in my pants. We can acknowledge physical sex and the effects of growing up while seen as a certain gender while still respecting trans identities, and i think the conversation is better if we do.
(also, where do intersex people fall in your spectrum? many of them get raised as women but they aren't "natal women", this video we're debating in the comments of does a good job discussing that aspect of this, even if we define by physical sex it turns out that physical sex isn't just "male and female" either)
@@littlegirlgogo Your comment was very insightful and it informed me a lot, so I'd like to reply to it with the same complexity/dedication. Right now I can't do that but I just wanted to thank you for the explanation
You mentioned the ingrained believe in history that men were hot like fire (😏) and women were cold like ice. If this belief stuck around in our culture my nerd brain immediately thought of the Xmen character Iceman. One of the main examples of a gay character in superhero comics. Its probably nothing but it’s interesting
Wait, Iceman was gay? Hm, never knew.
I know you are giving Cass the benefit of the doubt in this video, but its important to mention she follows multiple explicitly anti-trans accounts on social media and has met with multiple anti-trans figures in the past. In the interview where she states she isn't against puberty blockers, she also directly contradicts many clear and direct statements said as fact in the study.
So at this point its either that she didn't read the study at all before publishing it and had someone else write it; OR that the goal from the start was to create a modern, reference-able study for anti-trans legislation and movements to use while quietly walking back any statements to quiet outrage.
your visual metaphors and overall video style are incredible!! and I really can see how you are improving and having fun with your art)
and thank you so much for the topic
you are really cool
I think its also worth looking into how capitalism manufactures these social issues as a defence against social/class unity against it. Its a preservation mechanism.
However, in order to expand itself and make greater profits etc, it has to include more and more people and lowkey 'tolerate' the people it once excluded. But, at some point and I think its close, it'll run out of people to demonise and distract us with and then, we'll all kinda accept eachother because we have to work jobs with eachother, but not capitalism itself, then (provided we foster true solidarity) we'll be the collective that could bring it down.
@@loadishstone I would like to direct you to the section on capitalism less than halfway through the video. Abstracting the language doesn't mean not understanding the underlying complexity
@@loadishstone No, capitalism is a system and it does not discount similar issues under feudalism to discuss how they function under capitalism.
@@loadishstone I don't think anybody's claiming that those issues are exclusive to capitalism
I kinda disagree because with the end because IMO there's always a way to make up a new category to put people into, and I think that's part of human nature (related to how our brains are only designed to really "know" about 50 people in our lifetimes.) The way out is to foster a more communal spirit, where people have commonality as fellow humans despite any difference, which fortunately is also a natural human (even animal, in ideal circumstances) trait.
@@loadishstonethat’s like saying books are just words. When something is so ingrained into society it shapes every aspect of it, the system becomes the universe. If nothing is allowed to exist outside of capitalism in this country then it’s not just a system but a culture. Every one of us is a part of the culture. Even trying to rebel is done in the same way as conforming. Capitalism is an ideal made real. You have millions of people believing in and allowing something to shape their reality. Capitalism is a god. Gods die when no one believes
8:04 "He graphed the UK's data on a logarithmic scale to demonstrate that the exponential increase in cases actually occurred in 2009, which suggests a statistically significant probability that the reactionary outrage leading to the Cass Review is FAKE AND GAY."
I knew I liked you, Alexander.
just got this video as im about to come out to my therapist. thank you, Alexander Avila, your videos have been so much to me, including your video on self diagnosis and hannah montana. theyve all helped me so much.
good luck! i hope it went or goes well 💕
Good luck / congratulations!
Yeah! Because self diagnosis without any clinical professional involvement is totally healthy. I'm uncomfortable during puberty! I must be the opposite sex! 🤦🏻♂️
@@loganmiller5240 y r u even on this video if ur gonna be like this also this same guy has an entire video on self diagnosis watch it or smthn idfk
I hope this becomes a core part of the general conversation about gender and societal goals concerning it. The time and effort spent on legitimatizing our experiences to an existing framework is commendable, but ultimately, I feel, insufficient.
Too many have fought for their own inclusion, their own normalization only to turn around and ridicule and undermine similar struggles, for us to keep using the same systems and frameworks without question.
We don’t need to categorize brains for our experience to ”make sense”. How physical patterns map onto experience is fascinating, but what value comes from denying that experience if the expected pattern isn’t present?
I don’t know. Shit’s confusing sometimes.
And ultimately I think having some hard scientific evidence for being trans would be a disaster. Because if you can isolate a biological factor that causes something, you can then attempt to prevent of destroy it, like those people trying to “cure” autism. If bigots can find a way to eugenics you out of society, they’ll use it
"Too many have fought for their own inclusion, their own normalization only to turn around and ridicule and undermine similar struggles, for us to keep using the same systems and frameworks without question."
dont get me started on a certain type of bougie, white, conformity-obsessed tfem.... i deal w/enough of them when i play tf2
You can't make legislations based on something that can't be defined. You have to define something if you want legislations based on it. Every first year law student can tell you that much. You also need a non-circular definition for science, something that can be proved and disproved, otherwise it's not science, it's spiritualism at best.
@@saoirse2963 You people all talk in a particular way when you have not bothered to do the slightest bit of research. You think knowledge is a tone of voice that you can adopt.
Hey, I just wanted to say that this video is amazing and so well produced and researched. As someone who's writing their final paper in college with matters involving trans youth, education, and laws, the amount of interwoven materials and context can get overwhelming. So, really, thank you for such an incredible video and for the bibliography. Definitely gonna rewatch this many times and check the bibliography truly. Once again, thank you for this video and for the (indirect, but still direct) help.
4:25 i swear 😆 did you seriously just call it the "medical fandom" ?
that is such a tumblr move.
i love it.
Your dry humor never ceases to amuse me. Thank you 🙏🏻
your choice to use the Dean from Community as the picture for Michel Focault is actually an incredible
"to hell with nature's purpose" 🔥🔥🔥
the 'natural/unnatural' distinction has always occured to me as impossible. it's like, dude, how can you, perceiving the world through the eyes of a human, truly decide what is naturally and unnaturally human? not to mention, the weight the term 'natural' holds, as compared to just 'teleologically aligned'; the latter admits that it is a contingent distinction based on the framework of study rather than a necessity born out of God's will.
Being bullied and socially isolated and left alone as an autistic child with a dragonology book made my gender dragon and ive had this thought since i was 16.
God I wish my gender was dragon that sounds badass! Just make sure to avoid Ice and fairy types.
Except dragon isn't a real gender
@@sarahhughes4437 uhhuh, so what is a real gender, in your view?
@dribanlycan not a fictional animal, that's for sure. Lots of autistic people are transtrenders though
Oh dear, that's familiar. >>;
I didn't have the Dragonology book, though, just a poster of D&D dragons that I had to have on the back of my door because my mom hated it. :c
9:30: The argument that suddenly there are more kids being diagnosed with gender dysphoria, so we should be more selective about who we give puberty blockers to, is stupid. This would be like if there was spike in UTIs and we responded by giving fewer people UTI medication. Insane.
Not really when you presuppose discomfort with the sexed aspects of one’s body means he/she would therefore be better off as the opposite sex… and you start drugging and operating on them to make it so…