As an immigrant who came to the US 34 years ago and is now a very proud American citizen, I urge all people who want to come to the USA to do so through the proper process. This will prevent them from having to work under the table, being abused, and will help them understand and appreciate American values.
Can you explain your immigration journey? It’s not the same for everyone. Your line could have been shorter than a bunch of others. When you are in dire situations, waiting 15 years could be a death sentence.
You can walk up to the border and plead for asylum. Gov Greg Abbott is lying about the 'illegals' he sent to blue states. They were legal migrants he didn't want to be naturalized in Texas. He fears migrants will turn his red state, blue
It's the same problem Trump has with the Haitians. Haitians are not eating cats and dogs, nor does Trump care about it. Trump is worried the Haitian community will turn Missouri blue
@@EHCBunny4real illegals can't & don't vote & the politicians know this, it's just that their constituents enjoy the conspiratorial aspect of immigration rhetoric more than they care about any practical or real-life applications. opium for the masses type of thing.
Being a legal immigrant, it took me 20 years to get the citizenship. When people talk about just making illegal to legal, it shows how little they know about the immigration system.
I can imagine if you don't have money it would be tough to get help but my second wife wanted citizenship so we got a lawyer in the Asian part of LA and they were very efficient and for under $3000 she was a citizen in about 8 months. When we had appointments but we walked right in and were done in under 20 minutes every time. With paperwork it was simply "sign here". I can't imagine it being easier. She spoke English which helped a lot though so that might have made it simple. To be honest, I was surprised at just how easy it was to get her citizenship. The lawyers most definitely sped the entire process up, no doubt.
@@Gethin1978 Well I'm no racist for sure but I must say the Asians seem to be much more efficient at getting it done for a reasonable fee than many others in America. I told my Latino friends to send their people to the Asians...It's kinda like finding an honest divorce lawyer, most of them will drag it out in court to take your money but others are efficient and earn a record of fairness and performance. I got lucky but we did do research to find a good one. It's my experience that the Asians get shit done while others just talk.
I am now learning about it! I agreed to be a sponsor to my cousin's husband from China. He had gone to high school here when his father was a university researcher. He returned to go to college and met and married my cousin. The process is unnecessarily complex.
I disagree. Both Ms. Ruhle and Mr. Lomborg were partisan guests pushing their agenda. The "whataboutism" doesn't make Ms. Harris a better candidate and Mr. Lomborg a) talks about things he has no clue about "we can easily fix Tubercolosis" and b) lies through his teeth about the economic impact of climate change. 450% GDP growth over 76 year is roughly 2% per year (plus compounding effects). Costs of climate mitigation will be at 3% per year. Now let's assume it's 2% per year on average and you are looking at GDP stagnation due to climate change. From his own numbers, not mine.
The fascinating part here is Maher himself once fretted (on this show) about mass Muslim immigration to Europe. Now even the Europeans are waking up to the dangers of this.
Strong point on maternal and child health. In 2023, the WHO was stating that 4.5 million women and babies die from *preventable* deaths while giving birth globally. This should be the talking point in every right thinking nation and every right thinking person anywhere on this planet. Maternity wards in every nation should have no cost of admission.
Not enough to focus on maternal and child health unless equal emphasis on life AFTER. Otherwise, a majority saved will only live to suffer starvation, disease, horrific poverty, war, etc. Just life is inadequate-quality of life must be a huge factor. Focusing on maternal and child health is as shortsighted as the alleged “pro-life party”, which only seems to care about the fetus and damn them after birth.
Did you watch the new rule that they did on gender apartheid? I think this issue is a part of that. I think we ramble on about equality and we literally seem to forget that women are out there dying over absolutely nothing. Preventable nothing. As a woman, I think that women have their focus in the wrong place. There is no point in trying to overthrowing the patriarchy. Thats just buzz word stuff. The real war here is on the ground, in the life of every woman that is walking the earth. Women have to take care of each other because no one else is going to.
YES ABSOLUTELY. Also the fact that we have the capability and resources to actually ERADICATE TUBERCULOSIS and yet we are CHOOSING not to, and therefore millions of people die every year from a preventable disease…and the disease itself is getting worse BECAUSE of our lack of consistency and resource allocation and as a direct consequence is becoming increasingly more difficult to treat - to the point where, if we continue down the path we’re on, it could one day become untreatable. This was a hugely important and serious point he brought up, and it was frustrating and disappointing to watch the others trivialize it in such a way… I was actually really frustrated watching this episode, the few times when a really important and specific point was made by someone, and the others just bulldozed over it. Like, love him or hate him, but I absolutely agree with Bret Stephens about the need for Kamala to establish and inform the American people of what her serious positions on certain things like foreign and domestic policy are. I think where Stephanie sits, the way she was addressing Bret, is going to lose Kamala voters. Personally, as an American citizen and as someone with the privilege and responsibility to vote for who I believe will be the best president of this country, I cannot simply vote against a candidate and put my trust in the other candidate by default. I also find it incredibly patronizing and insulting to be told to just put my faith in Kamala because she is a “good person” and “really cares” about the country and at least she’s not Trump. That is bullshit. Also, I don’t know that Kamala IS a good person. I believe that Obama is a good person, I disagree with some of what he did in the Middle East, but I think he is a good person who cares about the country. I believe Hillary is a good person, she has her controversies, but I believe she is a person who cares about the country. I believe John McCain was a good person, I think Elizabeth Warren might be a good person, I think John Kerry probably is a good person, I think Nikki Hayley is probably a good person too…even if they are not “good people” and are truly amoral opportunists, they have all done things which prove they are serious about the wellbeing of this country and the people of this country. Kamala has only essentially said that she cares about caring. Her entire campaign is just - she’s not Biden and she’s TOTALLY not trump, and she’s very joyful about that and we should all be happy for her for that. She has done nothing to prove to me that she IS anyone of principle. Even if she took a firm stance on something and I disagreed with that stance, I would be able to respect her as a serious political leader. As things are though, she has said almost nothing of substance, and it is not unreasonable to expect something of substance in the candidate one is giving their, in all seriousness, very precious vote to. Like, I have to have before me a candidate made of something in order to vote for that candidate. I know what Donald Trump is made of which is why I will never vote for him, but I respect this country too much and value the responsibility that comes with getting to vote for the president too seriously to just vote for the non-trump option. I cannot just vote for a warm body that isn’t trump and I don’t have to apologize for that. I’m so sick of being talked down to, I’m so sick of obvious political bias, I’m tired of the lying and disrespect, I’m tired of utter lack of even basic coherent sentences. Anyways, Bret’s point was incredibly important too, and it was absolutely ridiculous and patronizing and frankly insulting the way that he was totally shut down. That attitude, the one of condescension and sanctimony which Stephanie and Bill had when addressing Bret, is going to lose Kamala the presidency. And I’m not a hater of either of them, I’m a big fan!! This was just so disappointing, disaffecting, and frustrating to watch.
And famous people ALWAYS claim they have guns (whether they do or not). Claiming a gun is a good preventative measure, complementing a guard dog and/or a security system.
If anyone asked her what type of gun it was (even just the make) she'd have no clue. Complete garbage lies. You will never see a video of her on a range because it would take months to film her even holding it correctly, let alone pulling a trigger without squealing or closing her eyes.
@@CalvinsWorldNews Dude. Why assume she is lying? When did Kamala Harris ever tell you a lie? And don't people learn to use a handgun safely in a 15-minute lesson?
@@TrumpFacts-wl2ik Lol she is definitely lying. I don't think her or Trump own guns or even like guns. Most people from California and New York are pretty anti guns.
Was in Kalmar this summer, and Huskvarna, and Visingsö, and Falun. Had to push the break for a giant moose with her calf crossing the road. Will be back next year ! Gorgeous jams and liquorice.
One thing I’ve always admired about Sweden? It’s how you guys always rake the leaves from your forests to prevent forest fires… at least that’s what Donald Trump said when he was president. 🤣😮💨🥰
The main reason for the backlash in Europe against immigration is because of the different values(rape, misogyny and killing is a normalized thing for them) and their reluctance to integrate.
Also no wierd political gymnastics to try and rationalise a narrative of being morally right. I hate how some people gas light their righteousness. I.e. the Republicans blocked a good immigration deal because they needed the political issue for the next election cycle, but they threw the baby out with the bathwater pretending it wasn't good enough. The era of good faith negotiations and compromise is dead. Republicans only want their agenda, and we won't only see this on immigration but also abortions, tax breaks for the rich, and isolationism.
Wow, we have orderly massive immigration, which up to now has been supported by the majority of the Canadian population, but that is being strained, and the backlash may be starting here as well, so Bret, you're partially correct, but an orderly inflow doesn't necessarily mean no backlash at all.
Problem is the right-wing are clueless on the facts. Tell them that 300,000+ Canadians retire each year and people are needed to replace them in the workplace. But they won't care. Chant 'Axe the TAx' non-stop and the non-tinkers will think they'll eliminate the carbon tax, but they won't explain how our trading partners will slap carbon tariffs on exports.
It's too much too soon, but Canada does have a very good point system for immigrants, so good the Australians copied it. Did you know it takes $150.000 to educate a kid through grade school? So many immigrants are immigrating with high school educations and many with college educations, so that's a win for Canada. Our tax dollars didn't pay for those educations, but I do believe it's too much too soon. We only have to look at the housing crisis as proof.
(*** A.S. I have been to Canada (Toronto/Vancouver/Montreal, at least), on four sojourns between 2002, and 2011. When in Toronto I stayed in a motel in Peter St, right near the theater, and I keep in contact with a person working in it. Anyway, she, and my brother who lives in Montreal (and has been a Canadian citizen for 40 years) both tell me that "over the past decade suburbs in Toronto have been transmogrified, to the degree that Candians are the clear minorities.) ************************************************* Brett Stephens gloats about the “innovation that immigrants bring”: Well, that might be the case with immigrants that come from some Asian countries [mainly with China, South Korea, and Subcontinental cradles [ostensibly being India] regarding those with decent educations and, perhaps, some wealth. As it turns out Brett, diplomatically concurs with this by saying the problem for Europe/Britain is with the locals becoming dispossessed by these interlopers. Tragically, when it comes to those millions of interlopers swarming into Britain, Europe and, INDEED, the US, from over a score of sociological, and economic crap heaps, ranging from the Middle East, and WORST of ALL, sub-Saharan Africa, the horrific reality is that hardly any of them could be remotely construed as beneficial. Indubitably, the severe detriments that have severely impacted upon Britain, Ireland, western Europe, and Scandinavia, from these ileducated, and unskilled interlopers is a horror to behold. With the most detrimental consequence being that the massive drug problems in these countries is due to them importing the vile subtances. The reality of affairs is that, 90 percent of all those featherless bipeds that have fled from sub-Saharan countries in Africa, and invaded Britain in the past decade have NEVER had permanent employment. For the average poor, white British who are on the waiting list for state housing have to wait a minimum of 5 years, and up to 11 years: averaging out to be 7 years, and nine months. However, if you are a black African with an education equivalent to someone in year 8 in a western country, and have neither a skill - let alone any motivation to get a job and work hard - the waiting period for a permanent council flat is within a maximum of 12 months of arriving.
IMHO if you asked the ~8 billion humans how many of them would agree to move to the west tomorrow and become citizens immediately - I would guess that half of them would say yes. Not all will actually do it for practical reasons but my point is, hundreds of millions of people would absolutely love to be citizens and have the rights of the western cultures (and Japan). But there isn't enough space for all of them - it will decimate the local communities if that was to happen. We should help them get across the line and also help them help themselves rather than left them move. But many of them don't even accept that.
Great Real Time, Loved the "New Rules". Bret and Stephanie were both so vibrant, they are two of my favorite Commentators / Journalists. Thanks Bill, I would say God Bless you, but.
@@richardparrot9202and the military industrial complex loves money. Imagine starting proxy wars and other wars of choice over the decades simply to make profit. If you support Ukraine that's what you support by the way
I agree completely. I don't like him on his podcast..but I love his show. I didn't know if it had to do with the writers, but it's also a more serious setting.
Idk this msnbc anchor, but saying it's unfounded for a black woman to say she'd shoot an intruder tells me she doesn't know black Americans. Maybe im biased as a southerner, but we all feel this way, regardless of race, and encourage women to defend themselves...
Kamala is a left wing Democrat female. default assumption, regardless of race, is that she would not be a gun owner. i'm not saying this stereotype is true in most cases, i am saying that ppl are gonna assume a liberal Democrat probably wouldn't own a gun. otoh, wrt Kamala, she was also a prosecutor. so maybe a bit tougher.
She was speaking more to general stereotypes of what “most” people think… black = Dem = anti gun. When, as you say, it’s not always true. But it was refreshing to hear, hence why it’s getting picked up in media.
His guest Lomborg is a climate skeptic crank full of outdated misinfo. EVs batteries are rapidly improving such that new EVs today are only 15% heavier than comparable sized ICE cars Also his “pollution” from tires and brakes claim is bunk. EVs use brakes less than ICE cars due to regenerative braking
@@TreatzTMA The following is how we should be discussing modern vehicles but like most things, it's become politicized: Extraction Efficiency Fuel to Wheel Efficiency Power Plant Efficiency CO2 g/km Emissions Impact Gas 85% 18% 15% 220 Low Gas-CNG or Propane 85% 23% 20% 170 Ultra low Hybrid 85% 36% 31% 110 Ultra low Hydrogen 85% 36% 31% 110 Super low Methanol 63% 36% 23% 110 Super low EV 85% 60% 31% 60 Super low
Why does NO ONE seem to ever know this? Regenerative braking uses back-electromotive force to stop an EV without ANYTHING physically touching your brake pads until the final moment your car comes to rest. NOTHING TOUCHES the pads or discs while slowing down. Is this too hard a concept to grasp? Yes, yes it is. RB uses Newton's laws of gravity and motion to put free "gas" in your tank, and substantially extends brake pad life. Escalades are heavier than a Tesla X, are rougher on tires AND burns brake pads every time you touch the brakes - but are the American dream car for most talking heads.
He must know that. Now, I feel like he's a biased bullshitter. Very disappointing. My EV has 130k miles still haven't replaced brake pads. I almost never use the brakes.
This is true. However one must also consider their local energy mix. If you're driving an EV in Texas or CA, you're probably a net loss of carbon. If you have a Tesla in West Virginia, you're powering that car based on like 70+% coal power generation
@@danielhansen7013 Since most everyone has the choice to source their electricity from renewable sources, it doesn't matter as much what your regional grid mix is. You can either install solar yourself, if you have the roof for it, or buy RE from a third party supplier and have your utility deliver it. No one has to use dirty electricity, that is a choice.
@@danielhansen7013 Daniel, please study this further. Even EVs that run on 100% coal are cleaner than your average car. Cars are extremely inefficient in their use of energy, that ends up trumping everything and FTR our energy mix is getting cleaner every day. You must now this. Coal is now only 16% of America's power production. Even places like WY are replacing huge amounts of coal with wind.
I’m sorry but I don’t believe the ONE study in England that says brakes & tires are causing more pollution than exhausts. I need more evidence & studies that can replicate/reproduce this study’s results.
if heavy cars are causing this problem there should already be plenty of data to show it since massive stupid azz SUVs that weigh 500-1000 kilos more than a wagon/estate/touring have taken over the auto market in the past 20 years As an old BMW fanatic I despise anything with a model name starting with X (maybe slightly less if its an E53 from which I can scavenge a shared part for one of my E39s) and I keep a barf bag in the driver door pocket in case I see one of those vile new ///XM monstrosities on the road
His guest Lomborg is a climate skeptic crank full of outdated misinfo. EVs batteries are rapidly improving such that new EVs today are only 15% heavier than comparable sized ICE cars Also his “pollution” from tires and brakes claim is bunk. EVs use brakes less than ICE cars due to regenerative braking
@@greebj Only in the US, where the rules are that light weight cars have to be fuel efficient but heavy ones don't. And... there IS plenty of data to show that SUVs kill lots more people than an equivalent number of smaller cars. So, a Swedish person worrying that now heavy vehicles are going to be more common in Europe makes total sense.
Lomborgs claim has two problems. A) EV’s wear LESS not MORE on brake pads, thereby causing less pad dust pollution. Why? Because they mostly use regenerative braking, which unlike ICE cars does not depend upon brake pads, but instead uses the electric motor to slow the vehicle. B)Also, his claim EVs are so much more heavy is no longer true either. Battery tech has been improving rapidly resulting in EVs today being only about 15% heavier on average than the equivalent size ICE car.
I think he was pointing out that ev's create more brake dust. But to your point my model S was making a sound from the rear brakes. Turns out it was the rotors but was very surprised after 400,000 miles I still had half of the pad left. Was very impressed.
It's pretty obvious that if your brakes are still working after 400K miles, then they get used at least an order of magnitude less than in gas cars, thus polluting an order of magnitude less. The beauty of Regen...
@@xaspirate8060 you got me thinking and it looks like brake dust in a combustible car is no less harmless than the ones in my model s. So when he mentioned brakes on an EV, I was like okay he seems right. Because my EV wheels happen to get more dust on them than my other car. And this is even when I apply brake cleaner on my pads every month. So after looking it up you're right and the good statistician isn't using his data truthfully. Turns out I get more dust only because of the sheer weight of the car causes a larger amount to disperse at a single time which gets collected on the wheel. Where a combustible car omits less amount at one time but so much frequently because of not having regenerative breaks. Ironically the statistician was on the show to uncover certain data points when he did the exact same thing.
This guy is wrong about more brake wear from electric cars because regenerative braking reduces brake pad use, and brake pads last longer on electric cars than gasoline powered cars. Also, a lot of people are driving around in huge trucks and SUV anyway, which are heavier than smaller electric cars.
I have no gas vehicles in my household, so all my miles are electric. I one pedal drive, and I rarely use my brakes so brake dust pollution is kind of over blown I think. How about we take away some of those oil subsidies and put them to battery R&D so we can get to cleaner batteries for our cars, cellphones, laptops, toothbrushes. Fyi cobalt is used in many applications in our modern world including refining oil into gas. It's used to remove impurities and make higher quality gas, reducing greenhouse gas emissions.
@@vettelover695regenerative braking reduces the use & load on the brake pads, thus reducing wear The vehicle slowing-force is caused by the magnetic resistance in the generator rather than the friction between the disk & pad. First I've heard of the environmental impacts of braking though
@@vettelover695 Regenerative braking reduces brake pad wear by using the vehicle's electric motor to slow down the car instead of relying solely on the traditional friction-based braking system. In regenerative braking, the electric motor operates in reverse, converting the vehicle's kinetic energy into electrical energy, which is stored in the battery. This process slows the vehicle down without needing the brake pads to create friction against the brake discs as much. Since the brake pads are used less frequently, they experience less wear and tear, extending their lifespan.
1. Those picketers in Canada 🇨🇦🇨🇦🇨🇦🇨🇦🇨🇦🇨🇦were blocking the border for TWO weeks. No cross-border traffic could get though. This includes American companies trying to deliver goods to Canada and vice versa. 2. They were warned many times to leave. They were affecting the livelihoods of others. 3. They had illegal weapons and a long list of other charges, including firearms misuse. 4. Because The Emergency Act was in place, our Government had the right to seize their accounts until they dispersed. This was the first time it was used. Only one time was a similar act invoked-It was the former War Measures Act. The War Measures Act was used in the 1970s due to a terrorist group in Canada, who kidnapped and killed a Canadian Cabinet Minister and a British diplomat. 5. These criminals (2 were arrested, charged, and convicted) were sentenced to 6.5 years in jail each.
@@Chris_Stanley007 They had another charge to face, but they were found innocent of that charge. I won’t mention it since they were found not guilty, but it was the most serious charge. They were a danger to the public and to the police (RCMP). They also had a pipe bomb. One of them (of 2 charged) got an extra six months for the pipe bomb. They are both banned from having firearms for life. Imagine the behaviour of both of them at the border that got them both convicted, with a lifetime firearms ban. They weren’t just holding signs up.
P.S. Bill I got Covid once last year on December 22. And I can say, that it was no BS. I was 64. 5'9" 185. I can only imagine being stuck in a cold wet trench, and I had covid....I can easily understand how it could kill someone.
@@xaspirate8060 Brett's main complaint with Trump is he would rather it be him running the country. Minus the CNN/msnbc idiot filter, Trump's policies would sound sensible.
Totally agree, Tesla brakes need replacement in 3-5 years. Compared to standard car would have 3-4 replacements. We have to start changing somewhere. EV cars will get better. True the mining for battery materials is not good, but everything has a cost either $, environmental or both. A bicycle, uses rubber, steel, aluminum, carbon fibre, hydraulic fluid for disc brakes. How far down should we drill to say something is bad for the environment.
Yes, but just regular brakes do. The regenerative aspect of brakes is only a portion. But, he qualified that statement by adding that all cars have that issue.
@@martinsteele3259 This is absolute nonsense. People aren't replacing brakes on normal cars annually. Jesus, the rear drum brakes on my small car are still fine a decade later (I check them annually, and the rear brakes handle only a relatively small portion of the overall braking). How often you need to replace your brakes is directly related to how frequently you drive, the weight of your vehicle, the components used, and how you drive. As mentioned, many electric car owners use their EVs as occasional, tertiary cars for short errands. ANY car not driven often will not need its brakes replaced frequently. Unless you're driving highly aggressively, entirely within a city, for very long distances, NO ONE would be changing their brakes annually. Depending on driving habits and the components, brakes can easily last over 50,000 miles for an "average" driver. Regenerative braking isn't some mystical cheat code; letting off the throttle in an automatic or simply engine braking with a manual transmission works similarly to slow a vehicle down without using the brakes by cycling the engine without adding fuel for combustion. It harnesses the friction of the moving engine to decelerate without using brakes. The only difference is that electric cars can recapture some of that energy as electricity. Internal combustion engines simply are not using fuel during that deceleration event since OBD2 has been around (~1996), so they still also save energy doing so. I have a small car with a manual transmission, so I predominantly use engine braking. Combined with the fact I mostly drive on the highway, I get well over 5 years on a set of brake pads on my front rotors, over twice that for my rear drums. Electric cars are much, much heavier than an equivalent car, so any braking that is required is still going to be proportionally greater. Regenerative braking and decelerating in gear help SLOW a vehicle, but they don't stop it in normal driving (momentum is real). In both instances, you still need to apply the brakes to fully stop the vehicle at the appropriate time to maintain a safe flow within traffic patterns.
5:25 that's not correct, electric cars don't have old style car breaks. One of the cool thing electric cars have is that they can reuse the energy that comes from the brakes to recharge their batteries. Old car brakes turn that kinetik energy just into heat and plastic particles emitted from the iron/rubber of the car brake.
EVs mostly don't use mechanical brakes. They use regen brakes which produces energy that goes back into the battery so there is way less brake dust pollution. EVs are way better for the environment even in West Virginia. If you're only car is electric and you get most of your energy from solar, there's no argument. I've been all electric since 2011 and will never buy an ICE car again.
My problem with this show: it's talking heads. Lithium is not necessarily dirty. California has a potential large reserve that would be a clean source of lithium: syphoning off the lithium from geothermal energy. The main thing about renewable energy is that you go to the energies that are good for that area (some areas in the US have a wind center, some solar, some geothermal). I'm in GA, and we just had the country's new nuclear facility. In TN, they are researching a cleaner and more efficient nuclear reactor that could usher in some more reactors in some areas.
Yes, as of all the gasoline just magically appears totally clean at the gas station. But gasoline is gone once you burned it. But the materials in batteries will be recycled to build new batteries.
How DELUSIONAL does ONE have to be to SAY that ASKING a PRESIDENTIAL candidate to ANSWER tough QUESTIONS is EXPECTING said CANDIDATE to be PERFECT...That is NEXT level GAS LIGHTING!!!
been driving a hybrid car for 4 years - works great - drive by the gas station - have to stop in maybe twice a year to fill up - 2-gallon tank size. Plug into my home every day & have roof top photocell panels that were installed 12 years ago - so my biggest problem is listening to the haters cry about the price of GAS
Wrong on BEVS most of the materials are now recyclable, many of the batteries now do not have cobalt and nickel, they are mainly lithium, iron and phosphate.
@@DeltaVxx Provided the EV has a motor or motors that are providing at least an equivalent amount of power to weight as an ICE (Internal Combustion Engine) vehicle, the reason EV's are faster is...torque. Electric motors have maximum torque instantly and maintain maximum torque while accelerating. It varies quite a bit by vehicle depending on the transmission but, the power band of an ICE or internal combustion engine is typically around 4,000 RPM. That's where maximum torque gets produced, and it ends after reaching maximum power, that is, above 5,000 RPM but not above 7,000 RPM. EV's don't typically have transmissions. The motor drives the wheel(s) (depending on how many motors the vehicle has) directly so...Maximum torque right from 1 mile per hour, all the way up to top speed. An expert on this thread could fine tune my comment but, even though Bjorn Lomborg sounded unsure, he was 100% correct. Think about how an electric drill works. You pull the trigger and the drill bit instantly turns at its top speed. It takes an EV longer to get to top speed because of the weight, friction and wind resistance but the principal is the same.
This is the same woman who after interviewing KH said that KH didn’t give clearly defined answers on the issues because the issues aren’t clearly defined. Huh?
I pretty much only watch the monologue and New Rule. These are great guests, but the competition to get their blurb finished in the insanely brief amount of time available finally gets on my nerves.
Good for Bill! I also read the story about the Swedes paying them to leave. I had an au pair 30 years ago and she said they could not go topless to beaches safely anymore. Some do not assimilate.
Talking about brakes on an EV… he completely ignored regenerative braking. If I understand it correctly, it doesn’t use the brakes at all, but in effect engine braking so as to recharge the batteries a bit as you slow down/lift off the gas, rendering the life span of the normal brakes almost indefinite.
This guy doesn't know shit about EVs, and like Bill, I'm skeptical of the rest of his talking points. Lots of EVs have tech built in to prevent collisions. Some of them are heavy because of the batteries, but they're not heavier than your basic ICE pickup trucks that roam the US in great abundance. Those are the real killers of climate and humans. A Tesla Model 3 weighs 3550 lbs. That's a pretty normal weight for a small sedan in this day and age. A V6 Toyota Camry weighs more. The lightest Dodge RAM is 4765 lbs, the heaviest is 6440.
You are correct as a previous owner of a 2010 Prius and a current owner of a 2015 Nissan Leaf and 2023 Chevy Bolt, I can tell you the brakes will last the life of the car. 95% of my driving is in town commuting and these vehicles work great for that. Love the no noise instant acceleration. The only problem Bill has is his lack of research. You never buy the first generation of any new technology (EV or ICE). I waited until the battery technology progressed on the Leaf so that the degradation due to heat in Louisiana was tolerable. And waited until they figured out why Chevy Bolts were catching fire. I must admit that I still own a reliable ICE Toyota Rav 4 for those long out of town trips 😊.
First, I'm sorry for your loss. I think the big issue was the extreme rhetoric on each side. The far right didn't take it seriously enough, and the far left made everyone think that COVID was a death sentence for most people. The exaggeration on both sides made it difficult for people to understand the true scope of the issue, and therefore take well informed decisions.
Walking to and from your table you must wear a mask. While sitting and eating you are not required to wear a mask. People think it was a bs because of rules like that.
The Vaccines where supposed to stop outbound transmission, and inbound contraction, and reduce the risk of a serious reaction. We now know what most of us already knew that all this was not true. People made billions of dollars in profit from the pandemic. A pandemic is supposed to be destructive not to a few but all. Many small business had to close down while the massive conglomerates made hand over fist as they where allowed to stay open.
The smoking gun is that air travel was not halted. One of the easiest ways to spread an air born disease is through air travel. If it was anywhere as serious as they where claiming it was they would of grounded every plane and docked every ship. That is in arguable. There is no reason that can be given to excuse this.
His guest Lomborg is a climate skeptic crank full of outdated misinfo. EVs batteries are rapidly improving such that new EVs today are only 15% heavier than comparable sized ICE cars Also his “pollution” from tires and brakes claim is bunk. EVs use brakes less than ICE cars due to regenerative braking
1. Hybrids are great. Spoke to a guy who bought a hybrid and gets about fuel about once a month. 2. If we can produce Sodium Ion batteries instead of lithium. We have tons of sodium readily available.
Lithium is the 3rd most available element in the universe while sodium is the 11th most available (source: the periodic table). It’s not the availability that’s the issue, it’s how to extract lithium the right way (ie efficiently, yet environmentally friendly at scale) that makes things difficult. Look up Lithium Valley if you want to know more about this topic.
@@luke_cohen1 Hey thx for engaging and yes, I totally understand the periodic table, and the energy density of lithium vs. sodium, but sodium-ion is still emerging. If cost, safety, and environmental impact are your primary concerns, (those are my main concerns) sodium-ion batteries might be more suitable. They are advantageous for large-scale energy storage systems, such as those used in renewable energy installations. The low cost and improved safety make them a great option for grid storage and other applications where space and weight are less critical. Moreover, their better performance in cold temperatures can be beneficial for outdoor or unheated environments. In a Hybrid vehicle, where you charge your batteries using the chemical energy in your gas tank, this will drive down the vehicles cost and be less likely to overheat. And in Canada (where I am), it can get pretty cold. Thats where sodium ion batteries shine….:). Again, thansk for engaging. This is a great conversation topic and people need to understand the pros and cons of each. Cheers. PS - Im also a big big fan of MSR’s - (Molten Salt Reactors). Check out this company. They are doing some wild things. (www.terrestrialenergy.com)
Perhaps if the Government forced companies to pay an honest wage rather than bringing in 3rd World country labour to do jobs that none of us could survive on the low wages the Industrialists are paying.
The USA has the big gates. They are wide open and there is not much wall. Walls for security are like cooking, you gotta watch, else things get ruined.
The mining of minerals is nothing new because of electric cars. They've been mining all those minerals used in auto batteries for over a century. They use these minerals in all sorts of other applications.
FYI=> Stephanie Ruhle spent 14 years in the finance industry. At Credit Suisse she served as a vice president and became the highest producing credit derivatives salesperson in the United States. At Deutsche Bank she was managing director of Global Markets.
@@ryantogo8359 She has an A+ brain that could run circles around DJT .. She knows things he could never understand. She rose to the top . DJT bankrupted to the bottom - getting convected of crimes...
@@robertblake60 She knows what she's talking about. DJT just repeats stuff he's read on X..... She has actually done things, made sales, completed contracts. She's the real thing. -- DJT is a con....
Have you ever called a US embassy? I dare you to try and get someone on the phone . Immigration process is crap and has been for decades . Please try to call US embassy . Pick whatever nation you like and try to call, email , make appointment. Zero response . No one answers phone . So.... I am American and I understand why people ignore the legal route . Baltimore, MD.
Phone call any business? Your gonna get a robot. Extremely difficult to get a human for help. Email them? Again, almost never get a response except, a thank you for contacting and we will get back to you.
Asking why they leave and helping them make real efforts in their own countries is too little discussed. Sitting in a crappy place and pumping out so many children that none of you can stand it is just bad math.
"100% recyclable" is 100% not true at this point in time It's barely even economical at this point to disassemble a battery pack to find and replace failed cells among the many hundreds still with usable lifespan. And that's just using 99% of what's still perfectly good battery hardware. If you can invent the industrial process that can regenerate a battery at less pollution cost than making a new one, the world will love you for it (it doesn't matter even if it's not economical - governments have shown in abundance that EV subsidy doesn't have to make any fiscal sense whatsoever)
Stephanie ...? 🙂 IF you like BRAIN-less media parrot, repeating the anti-Trump, anti-Putin propaganda ... BTW all over sudden Bill Maher went full INSANE Anti-Trump diatriabe , what happened?, did Bil get a urgent FAX from the WH, and the DNC HQ not to be too'smart' and go easy on ANTI-TRUMP propoganda, since the DeepState, BigState are now WORRYING that 'cackling' Kamala is not 'loved' enough ... ... and EVERYONE has to "pile on" Trumpster NOW, so OBEY or you be DELETED, CANCELLED ... 😞!
Bill Maher is an unserious anti-intellectual diva, who's as self-absorbed, and as self-righteous, as Trump, and as most coastal elites are. I wouldn't put much stock in what he says, but still always remain aware of those with power, and influence.
its a shame that Stephanie Ruhle, whenever Bret Stephens was critical on Harris, always tried to turn the question around to being critical on Trump, which I think most of us are. Yet Stephanie Ruhle never answered the question regarding Harris
Brett Stephens gloats about the “innovation that immigrants bring”: Well, that might be the case with immigrants that come from some Asian countries [mainly with China, South Korea, and Subcontinental cradles [ostensibly being India] regarding those with decent educations and, perhaps, some wealth. As it turns out Brett, diplomatically concurs with this by saying the problem for Europe/Britain is with the locals becoming dispossessed by these interlopers. Tragically, when it comes to those millions of interlopers swarming into Britain, Europe and, INDEED, the US, from over a score of sociological, and economic crap heaps, ranging from the Middle East, and WORST of ALL, sub-Saharan Africa, the horrific reality is that hardly any of them could be remotely construed as beneficial. Indubitably, the severe detriments that have severely impacted upon Britain, Ireland, western Europe, and Scandinavia, from these ileducated, and unskilled interlopers is a horror to behold. With the most detrimental consequence being that the massive drug problems in these countries is due to them importing the vile subtances. The reality of affairs is that, 90 percent of all those featherless bipeds that have fled from sub-Saharan countries in Africa, and invaded Britain in the past decade have NEVER had permanent employment. For the average poor, white British who are on the waiting list for state housing have to wait a minimum of 5 years, and up to 11 years: averaging out to be 7 years, and nine months. However, if you are a black African with an education equivalent to someone in year 8 in a western country, and have neither a skill - let alone any motivation to get a job and work hard - the waiting period for a permanent council flat is within a maximum of 12 months of arriving.
Her answer was PERFECT. You don't need to know - or even AGREE with - everything about Vice President Harris, because you already know everything you need to know about how bad tRump is. BTW, when is tRump dishing out the details about his "concepts of a plan?" Sometime in the next 2 weeks, right?
@@omicron2018 do not get me wrong, I think Trump is psychopath. As someone who is firmly a left-centrist, I find it increasingly annoying when a political commentator on the left cannot stand to hear anything bad or critical about the leftist politician they are currently cheerleading for
Mining lithium and cobalt is dirty unlike gas and oil which is clean as a spring meadow. Yeah right? Black is white and night is day. Yes it takes energy to make cars of all types, but EV's don't directly add millions of tons of CO2 to the atmosphere every year like combustion engines are designed to do. BTW, cobalt is being phased out rapidly as a component of EV's. Most are using lithium iron phosphate batteries which don't use cobalt at all.
There are costs and benefits to everything. The idea that electric cars only have benefits and no costs is naive. Because of the complexity it can be difficult to compare, because you are not comparing apples to apples. The environmental damage from batteries is different than from fossil fuels. Increased CO2 isn't all bad either, there has been significant greening worldwide directly linked to the increased CO2 as it is plant food. Yes there are environmental costs from the burning of fossil fuels, but there are also costs from "green" energy.
BS ALERT: the blond dude said EVs produce a lot more pollution from increased wear on brake pads because they’re heavier. Like most anti-EV horseshit flying around lately, that’s false. EVs use regenerative braking, so instead of wearing brake pads, much or most of the friction of braking is cleanly harvested to recharge the battery. That’s not pollution, that’s energy efficiency.
The problem with that analogy is that Stephen's is already in the car. He's simply trying to advise on how to get the rest of the dogs into the car but they're so concerned with purity tests they can't even comprehend what he's saying so bill makes an analogy that is a false equivalency.
The panel this week had very, very good opinions and was quite engaging and entertaining, especially Stephanie Ruhle. The guest, Bjorn Lomborg, also had good opinions but, in my opinion, sort of wandered before he reached a focus. I'd certainly like to see Bret Stephens and Stephanie Ruhle return soon to the panel.
And mining the materials for batteries is pretty much a one-off for each car with the impact of mining for all the other things (steel etc) in common with IC engined cars. Production of the fuel to put into IC engined cars is orders of magnitude worse over the life of a vehicle.
People focus on CO2 over other environmental issues because CO2 is especially urgent. We can tackle climate change and then other issues once climate change has abated. That said, electric cars are no substitute for public transit.
@@stone-rock No, but there are cities that have adequate public transit for most hours of the day and it would be even better if more people didn’t resort to driving in the first place.
I like Bjorn. He understands that it is more about management versus hurtling towards the sun. AOC is already an invalid opinion because "five years later" I am typing this. He knows the game...so many "Gretas" out there trying to be heroic.
I find people have a tough time differentiating between broader climate issues and climate change specific problems. Even bill Maher was getting mixed up on this point when asking about the plastic in the ocean, when Bjorn was discussing CO2
@@DInDelusion I have to admit, Bill seemed a bit aggressive toward Bjorn tonight. In the past he listened to him intently. I do like that he is one of the few who talks about pollution management. There was a time when that was a big deal. Still is.
Bret Stephens making the argument that Harris should be answering more questions directly is making his argument in the most counterintuitive way possible. He's giving the perfect demonstration of why she shouldn't!! He has a very firm opinion on the particular issue he was raising and feels very strongly about what Harris' answer should be to it AND ALSO said he agreed he was planning to vote against Trump in absence of an answer to that question. Come on man if Harris was watching that clip you just convinced her what she's doing right now is the perfect strategy. I really wish people would stop confusing their personal desires with wise electoral strategy.
I'm surprised the "EV Expert" did not mention that "Regenerative Braking" can stop an EV car without actually applying the brakes. He is not as informed as he makes himself to be ;)
Agreed. I rarely use breaks to stop the car. I have over 100k miles and they haven’t been replaced. He does have a point on the tires though. Not sure how much ends up in the air but they last about 60% as long as gas vehicles.
She seemed very genuine, Brett did too, that's refreshing to see. But she had so much more charisma, wit and conviction. Brett has become kind of a p***y. She's definitely one of my favorite guests in a while.
Getting oil and gas isn't dirty? Mining ores for regular cars isn't dirty? Don't forget, electric cars also means no anti-freeze, no transmission fluid, no oil changes, no oil filters....
@@annchovey2089 if you drive a long way every day, then yeah, that might be a problem. But most people will just charge it at home overnight and it's fully charged the next day.
Hard to believe someone like Stephanie Rhule who calls herself a journalist thinks it’s acceptable for a major party candidate for president to answer no questions about where she stands in the issues. I don’t care what you think, Stephanie. I want to know where the candidates stand and if they aren’t ready to say they can’t be trusted and won’t get my vote.
The other side of the border bill- not strong enough? It was led by a conservative and could have dramatically changed immigration law for the first time in decades. It includes, for example, a new emergency authority to restrict border crossings if daily average migrant encounters reach a certain level, raises the legal standard of proof to pass the initial screening for asylum and expedites the asylum processing timeline. It was endorsed by the labor union that represents U.S. Border Patrol agents. Everyone knows lasting change de requires legislation, not executive orders. - we all know why they tanked the border bill- give me a break.
Which “Conservative,” led it? All of those “new emergency authority” are things the President can already do and doesn’t require an act of Congress. “Restrict border crossings if daily average [crossings] reach a certain level?” So it codifies that we’re good with 5,000 illegal immigrants a day. That bill was absolute garbage.
@@VincenzoC749 Lankford from Oklahoma was the conservative who led the Feb 2024 bill. It’s hard to take seriously any criticism on immigration when, on Trumps orders, the GOP tanked border bill that would expel migrants at the southern U.S. border and required stricter criteria for asylum seekers while providing over $20 billion in supplemental appropriations to various agencies, (DOJ,HLS) to bolster border security and combat fentanyl trafficking. So then, what SPECIFICALLY do you consider “garbage” in the bill that The National Border Patrol Council - which represents more than 18,000 agents - said would “drop illegal border crossings nationwide and will allow our agents to get back to detecting and apprehending those who want to cross our border illegally and evade apprehension.”? Trump's border policies from 2017-2019 were largely ineffective, resulting in the highest number of crossings in the decade. Despite reallocating defense funds, Trump couldn't complete the promised wall, receiving bipartisan criticism. His failed attempts prove that executive orders are not enough to solve the border issues, since many of his policies got struck down in court. And guess who got stuck paying the legal bills? The American taxpayer. Ultimately, It was a health regulation that controlled the border numbers, not Trump strategy. The fact that he trashed the Feb 2024 Republican border bill shows how little he cares about solving this issue. His policies lacked real impact, and it was the health measure, Title 42, not his strategy, that temporarily reduced crossings, prompted by his poor handling of the pandemic. Real, lasting change requires legislation, which is why the Biden-Harris administration, worked across the aisle for border reform. Trump opposed a bipartisan bill, indicating a preference for keeping the issue alive in conservative media rather than solving it. www.pbs.org/newshour/amp/politics/whats-in-the-senates-118-billion-border-and-ukraine-deal
@@GailChiarovano that border bill was an absolute disaster that would have done nothing but facilitate endless mass-migration until the country collapsed. That bill was absolutely garbage. Nothing in that bill was anything the president couldn’t already be doing if he wanted to.
@@GailChiarovano The bill was a sham to shift blame from Biden's inaction on the border for three years. Anyway, this was an interesting tidbit in the bill: "Provides that the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia has sole and original jurisdiction over any challenge arising from the Secretary’s authority to exercise the border emergency authority." Okay, let's give sole jurisdiction to a court that has 9 Democrat appointed judges and 4 Republican appointed judges. Hmm... gee, I wonder how they would interpret these new laws when challenged?
Stephanie Rhule is one of the most condescending journalists I’ve ever heard. She feels because she thinks Trump is bad she’s right and of course everyone feels the same. She assumes everyone is decided on what side they want to vote. She was so rude to your guest. Smart people don’t vote based on personality. They vote on policy. Everyone has a right to hear policies of both sides.
Personality MATTERS. Trump is a pathological liar, a malignant narcissist, and an unmitigated sociopath. It matters that he's a very damaged person. These traits should be obvious.
WTF are you talking about? Unlike yourself, he has always had the ability to look at an issue individually. He's unique in that he doesn't feel the need to tow the Party line. That is why he's been around for decades doing this. Leftists hate him now because they are aware of his influence and he does not cave to all of the silly BS.
As an immigrant who came to the US 34 years ago and is now a very proud American citizen, I urge all people who want to come to the USA to do so through the proper process. This will prevent them from having to work under the table, being abused, and will help them understand and appreciate American values.
Can you explain your immigration journey? It’s not the same for everyone. Your line could have been shorter than a bunch of others. When you are in dire situations, waiting 15 years could be a death sentence.
You can walk up to the border and plead for asylum. Gov Greg Abbott is lying about the 'illegals' he sent to blue states. They were legal migrants he didn't want to be naturalized in Texas. He fears migrants will turn his red state, blue
It's the same problem Trump has with the Haitians. Haitians are not eating cats and dogs, nor does Trump care about it. Trump is worried the Haitian community will turn Missouri blue
@@EHCBunny4real illegals can't & don't vote & the politicians know this, it's just that their constituents enjoy the conspiratorial aspect of immigration rhetoric more than they care about any practical or real-life applications. opium for the masses type of thing.
I had the same experience. Immigrants should apply at his country embassy or consulate.
Being a legal immigrant, it took me 20 years to get the citizenship. When people talk about just making illegal to legal, it shows how little they know about the immigration system.
"Legal" and "citizenship" are two different things. They're not talking about just making someone "illegal" to "citizen."
I can imagine if you don't have money it would be tough to get help but my second wife wanted citizenship so we got a lawyer in the Asian part of LA and they were very efficient and for under $3000 she was a citizen in about 8 months. When we had appointments but we walked right in and were done in under 20 minutes every time. With paperwork it was simply "sign here". I can't imagine it being easier. She spoke English which helped a lot though so that might have made it simple. To be honest, I was surprised at just how easy it was to get her citizenship. The lawyers most definitely sped the entire process up, no doubt.
Took me 7 years and $35,000 to get a green card, you're right, people have no idea!
@@Gethin1978 Well I'm no racist for sure but I must say the Asians seem to be much more efficient at getting it done for a reasonable fee than many others in America. I told my Latino friends to send their people to the Asians...It's kinda like finding an honest divorce lawyer, most of them will drag it out in court to take your money but others are efficient and earn a record of fairness and performance. I got lucky but we did do research to find a good one. It's my experience that the Asians get shit done while others just talk.
I am now learning about it! I agreed to be a sponsor to my cousin's husband from China. He had gone to high school here when his father was a university researcher. He returned to go to college and met and married my cousin. The process is unnecessarily complex.
Excellent guests, great show tonight. 👏👏Love the intelligent conversation and a happy host.
Agreed,
I disagree. Both Ms. Ruhle and Mr. Lomborg were partisan guests pushing their agenda. The "whataboutism" doesn't make Ms. Harris a better candidate and Mr. Lomborg a) talks about things he has no clue about "we can easily fix Tubercolosis" and b) lies through his teeth about the economic impact of climate change. 450% GDP growth over 76 year is roughly 2% per year (plus compounding effects). Costs of climate mitigation will be at 3% per year. Now let's assume it's 2% per year on average and you are looking at GDP stagnation due to climate change. From his own numbers, not mine.
Stephanie Ruhle ... Excellent guests.. come on. She is a MSNBC LEFTY
Of course, because you only want to hear your ideology. Typical American.
Hope Stephanie returns soon. This was her first appearance and this is definitely her kind of show.
The fascinating part here is Maher himself once fretted (on this show) about mass Muslim immigration to Europe. Now even the Europeans are waking up to the dangers of this.
Strong point on maternal and child health. In 2023, the WHO was stating that 4.5 million women and babies die from *preventable* deaths while giving birth globally. This should be the talking point in every right thinking nation and every right thinking person anywhere on this planet. Maternity wards in every nation should have no cost of admission.
Not enough to focus on maternal and child health unless equal emphasis on life AFTER. Otherwise, a majority saved will only live to suffer starvation, disease, horrific poverty, war, etc. Just life is inadequate-quality of life must be a huge factor. Focusing on maternal and child health is as shortsighted as the alleged “pro-life party”, which only seems to care about the fetus and damn them after birth.
be careful what you wish for. 160K women dying each year means thát less stress on hospitals etc. I guess that's why they let them die.
Did you watch the new rule that they did on gender apartheid? I think this issue is a part of that. I think we ramble on about equality and we literally seem to forget that women are out there dying over absolutely nothing. Preventable nothing. As a woman, I think that women have their focus in the wrong place. There is no point in trying to overthrowing the patriarchy. Thats just buzz word stuff. The real war here is on the ground, in the life of every woman that is walking the earth. Women have to take care of each other because no one else is going to.
With the overturn of Roe v Wade ... Healthcare providers are fleeing the fields.
YES ABSOLUTELY. Also the fact that we have the capability and resources to actually ERADICATE TUBERCULOSIS and yet we are CHOOSING not to, and therefore millions of people die every year from a preventable disease…and the disease itself is getting worse BECAUSE of our lack of consistency and resource allocation and as a direct consequence is becoming increasingly more difficult to treat - to the point where, if we continue down the path we’re on, it could one day become untreatable. This was a hugely important and serious point he brought up, and it was frustrating and disappointing to watch the others trivialize it in such a way…
I was actually really frustrated watching this episode, the few times when a really important and specific point was made by someone, and the others just bulldozed over it. Like, love him or hate him, but I absolutely agree with Bret Stephens about the need for Kamala to establish and inform the American people of what her serious positions on certain things like foreign and domestic policy are. I think where Stephanie sits, the way she was addressing Bret, is going to lose Kamala voters. Personally, as an American citizen and as someone with the privilege and responsibility to vote for who I believe will be the best president of this country, I cannot simply vote against a candidate and put my trust in the other candidate by default. I also find it incredibly patronizing and insulting to be told to just put my faith in Kamala because she is a “good person” and “really cares” about the country and at least she’s not Trump. That is bullshit. Also, I don’t know that Kamala IS a good person. I believe that Obama is a good person, I disagree with some of what he did in the Middle East, but I think he is a good person who cares about the country. I believe Hillary is a good person, she has her controversies, but I believe she is a person who cares about the country. I believe John McCain was a good person, I think Elizabeth Warren might be a good person, I think John Kerry probably is a good person, I think Nikki Hayley is probably a good person too…even if they are not “good people” and are truly amoral opportunists, they have all done things which prove they are serious about the wellbeing of this country and the people of this country. Kamala has only essentially said that she cares about caring. Her entire campaign is just - she’s not Biden and she’s TOTALLY not trump, and she’s very joyful about that and we should all be happy for her for that. She has done nothing to prove to me that she IS anyone of principle. Even if she took a firm stance on something and I disagreed with that stance, I would be able to respect her as a serious political leader. As things are though, she has said almost nothing of substance, and it is not unreasonable to expect something of substance in the candidate one is giving their, in all seriousness, very precious vote to. Like, I have to have before me a candidate made of something in order to vote for that candidate. I know what Donald Trump is made of which is why I will never vote for him, but I respect this country too much and value the responsibility that comes with getting to vote for the president too seriously to just vote for the non-trump option. I cannot just vote for a warm body that isn’t trump and I don’t have to apologize for that. I’m so sick of being talked down to, I’m so sick of obvious political bias, I’m tired of the lying and disrespect, I’m tired of utter lack of even basic coherent sentences.
Anyways, Bret’s point was incredibly important too, and it was absolutely ridiculous and patronizing and frankly insulting the way that he was totally shut down. That attitude, the one of condescension and sanctimony which Stephanie and Bill had when addressing Bret, is going to lose Kamala the presidency.
And I’m not a hater of either of them, I’m a big fan!! This was just so disappointing, disaffecting, and frustrating to watch.
Prosecutors usually have guns.They often are targets by felons unhappy with their convictions.
And famous people ALWAYS claim they have guns (whether they do or not). Claiming a gun is a good preventative measure, complementing a guard dog and/or a security system.
If anyone asked her what type of gun it was (even just the make) she'd have no clue. Complete garbage lies. You will never see a video of her on a range because it would take months to film her even holding it correctly, let alone pulling a trigger without squealing or closing her eyes.
@@CalvinsWorldNews Dude. Why assume she is lying? When did Kamala Harris ever tell you a lie? And don't people learn to use a handgun safely in a 15-minute lesson?
@@TrumpFacts-wl2ik Lol she is definitely lying. I don't think her or Trump own guns or even like guns. Most people from California and New York are pretty anti guns.
@@TrumpFacts-wl2ik Bill should include it in one of his “I don’t know it for a fact, I just know it’s true” segments
Swedish person here. I'm coming over with axe and shield. Them's fighting words! 😂
I'll bring the surströmming 🙂
Was in Kalmar this summer, and Huskvarna, and Visingsö, and Falun. Had to push the break for a giant moose with her calf crossing the road. Will be back next year ! Gorgeous jams and liquorice.
One thing I’ve always admired about Sweden? It’s how you guys always rake the leaves from your forests to prevent forest fires… at least that’s what Donald Trump said when he was president. 🤣😮💨🥰
@@MemphisTiger Ha, ha, yeah...
@@MemphisTiger actually that was Finland. Little bit more to the east of here buddy ;)
The main reason for the backlash in Europe against immigration is because of the different values(rape, misogyny and killing is a normalized thing for them) and their reluctance to integrate.
Good job tonight, more like this. No yelling or talking over each other
Also no wierd political gymnastics to try and rationalise a narrative of being morally right. I hate how some people gas light their righteousness. I.e. the Republicans blocked a good immigration deal because they needed the political issue for the next election cycle, but they threw the baby out with the bathwater pretending it wasn't good enough.
The era of good faith negotiations and compromise is dead. Republicans only want their agenda, and we won't only see this on immigration but also abortions, tax breaks for the rich, and isolationism.
It helps when you have mature and intelligent guests instead of podcasters and partisan hacks like Rich Lowery the other week.
But that's because they are all on the same "side".
@@xaspirate8060 And that's a problem because?!
@@xaspirate8060 And that's a problem because?!
Wow, we have orderly massive immigration, which up to now has been supported by the majority of the Canadian population, but that is being strained, and the backlash may be starting here as well, so Bret, you're partially correct, but an orderly inflow doesn't necessarily mean no backlash at all.
Problem is the right-wing are clueless on the facts. Tell them that 300,000+ Canadians retire each year and people are needed to replace them in the workplace. But they won't care. Chant 'Axe the TAx' non-stop and the non-tinkers will think they'll eliminate the carbon tax, but they won't explain how our trading partners will slap carbon tariffs on exports.
It's too much too soon, but Canada does have a very good point system for immigrants, so good the Australians copied it. Did you know it takes $150.000 to educate a kid through grade school? So many immigrants are immigrating with high school educations and many with college educations, so that's a win for Canada. Our tax dollars didn't pay for those educations, but I do believe it's too much too soon. We only have to look at the housing crisis as proof.
Umm,orderly?How can you describe our immigration these last 3 years as orderly?
(*** A.S. I have been to Canada (Toronto/Vancouver/Montreal, at least), on four sojourns between 2002, and 2011. When in Toronto I stayed in a motel in Peter St, right near the theater, and I keep in contact with a person working in it. Anyway, she, and my brother who lives in Montreal (and has been a Canadian citizen for 40 years) both tell me that "over the past decade suburbs in Toronto have been transmogrified, to the degree that Candians are the clear minorities.)
*************************************************
Brett Stephens gloats about the “innovation that immigrants bring”: Well, that might be the case with immigrants that come from some Asian countries [mainly with China, South Korea, and Subcontinental cradles [ostensibly being India] regarding those with decent educations and, perhaps, some wealth.
As it turns out Brett, diplomatically concurs with this by saying the problem for Europe/Britain is with the locals becoming dispossessed by these interlopers.
Tragically, when it comes to those millions of interlopers swarming into Britain, Europe and, INDEED, the US, from over a score of sociological, and economic crap heaps, ranging from the Middle East, and WORST of ALL, sub-Saharan Africa, the horrific reality is that hardly any of them could be remotely construed as beneficial. Indubitably, the severe detriments that have severely impacted upon Britain, Ireland, western Europe, and Scandinavia, from these ileducated, and unskilled interlopers is a horror to behold. With the most detrimental consequence being that the massive drug problems in these countries is due to them importing the vile subtances.
The reality of affairs is that, 90 percent of all those featherless bipeds that have fled from sub-Saharan countries in Africa, and invaded Britain in the past decade have NEVER had permanent employment. For the average poor, white British who are on the waiting list for state housing have to wait a minimum of 5 years, and up to 11 years: averaging out to be 7 years, and nine months. However, if you are a black African with an education equivalent to someone in year 8 in a western country, and have neither a skill - let alone any motivation to get a job and work hard - the waiting period for a permanent council flat is within a maximum of 12 months of arriving.
IMHO if you asked the ~8 billion humans how many of them would agree to move to the west tomorrow and become citizens immediately - I would guess that half of them would say yes. Not all will actually do it for practical reasons but my point is, hundreds of millions of people would absolutely love to be citizens and have the rights of the western cultures (and Japan).
But there isn't enough space for all of them - it will decimate the local communities if that was to happen.
We should help them get across the line and also help them help themselves rather than left them move. But many of them don't even accept that.
"Speaking of dirty, Stephanie..." Oh that's hilarious!
And she gave as good as she got from 7:35
Maga tears ⬆️
@@jdmacgyver2062
Lib tears hearing the truth
Hey Bill, Why not mention the america killed by the IDF last weak instead of covid sex parties?
Smart women are always a threat to titty babies!
Great Real Time, Loved the "New Rules". Bret and Stephanie were both so vibrant, they are two of my favorite Commentators / Journalists. Thanks Bill, I would say God Bless you, but.
He's an atheist demon, don't bother.
Ignorance is far and away the root of all evil. If civics were taught better people would understand who does what and how.
Totally agree…I’m not sure it’s in many curriculums at all. I took it in the seventh grade many moons ago.
No money and power are. Always have been.
@@wizzerwiser2056 News flash: LOVE of money and power is the root of all evil. Always has been.
Just like Bill and most of his guests. Ignorant beyond belief.
@@richardparrot9202and the military industrial complex loves money. Imagine starting proxy wars and other wars of choice over the decades simply to make profit. If you support Ukraine that's what you support by the way
Maher is better on tv than on his podcast, because on tv he is sober. 👍
I like that he imbibes a bit on podcast...depending on guest of course.
Is he sober?
@@vinnym5607 Most likely for the show. A lot to keep track of.
I agree completely. I don't like him on his podcast..but I love his show. I didn't know if it had to do with the writers, but it's also a more serious setting.
It's more serious intentionally..Club Random is looser because he smokes and, sometimes, too much@goldengnome1951
Idk this msnbc anchor, but saying it's unfounded for a black woman to say she'd shoot an intruder tells me she doesn't know black Americans. Maybe im biased as a southerner, but we all feel this way, regardless of race, and encourage women to defend themselves...
People who work at MSNBC are essentially dumb.
Kamala is a left wing Democrat female.
default assumption, regardless of race, is that she would not be a gun owner.
i'm not saying this stereotype is true in most cases, i am saying that ppl are gonna assume a liberal Democrat probably wouldn't own a gun.
otoh, wrt Kamala, she was also a prosecutor.
so maybe a bit tougher.
Exactly. Kamala said that to SOUND Black, not in spite of the 100% Black lived experience she pretends to have.
Ok she doesn't. So what?
She was speaking more to general stereotypes of what “most” people think… black = Dem = anti gun. When, as you say, it’s not always true. But it was refreshing to hear, hence why it’s getting picked up in media.
By far, one of the best panels of the season to-date. Bring back Steph and Bret again soon after the election. Please!
Agreed, Steph does RULE!!!
A Prius is a hybrid not an EV. Also, you fly private Bill so you didn't really take one for the team. 😁
His guest Lomborg is a climate skeptic crank full of outdated misinfo.
EVs batteries are rapidly improving such that new EVs today are only 15% heavier than comparable sized ICE cars
Also his “pollution” from tires and brakes claim is bunk. EVs use brakes less than ICE cars due to regenerative braking
How do you expect him to get around.. push bike. Live in reality
Well Prius was one of the first mass made HEV and INSANELY uncool and lame so cut him some slack Mr Perfect
@@TreatzTMA The following is how we should be discussing modern vehicles but like most things, it's become politicized:
Extraction Efficiency Fuel to Wheel Efficiency Power Plant Efficiency CO2 g/km Emissions Impact
Gas 85% 18% 15% 220 Low
Gas-CNG or
Propane 85% 23% 20% 170 Ultra low
Hybrid 85% 36% 31% 110 Ultra low
Hydrogen 85% 36% 31% 110 Super low
Methanol 63% 36% 23% 110 Super low
EV 85% 60% 31% 60 Super low
@@TreatzTMAthey actually look pretty cool now, like half the cars now it looks like something out of Sci Fi
How about better mass transit, rails, buses, streetcars, bicycles...?
Or walking
@@TheTrut416I don't own a car. I can't afford it!
Absolutely
@@nancyroysden1194you can afford a car. A beater will cost less than your cell phone.
Go buy a bike. The USA is vast.
Electric vehicles use regenerative breaking which utilizes the break pads only a fraction of what a gas vehicles do.
Why does NO ONE seem to ever know this? Regenerative braking uses back-electromotive force to stop an EV without ANYTHING physically touching your brake pads until the final moment your car comes to rest. NOTHING TOUCHES the pads or discs while slowing down. Is this too hard a concept to grasp? Yes, yes it is. RB uses Newton's laws of gravity and motion to put free "gas" in your tank, and substantially extends brake pad life. Escalades are heavier than a Tesla X, are rougher on tires AND burns brake pads every time you touch the brakes - but are the American dream car for most talking heads.
He must know that. Now, I feel like he's a biased bullshitter. Very disappointing. My EV has 130k miles still haven't replaced brake pads. I almost never use the brakes.
This is true. However one must also consider their local energy mix. If you're driving an EV in Texas or CA, you're probably a net loss of carbon. If you have a Tesla in West Virginia, you're powering that car based on like 70+% coal power generation
@@danielhansen7013 Since most everyone has the choice to source their electricity from renewable sources, it doesn't matter as much what your regional grid mix is. You can either install solar yourself, if you have the roof for it, or buy RE from a third party supplier and have your utility deliver it. No one has to use dirty electricity, that is a choice.
@@danielhansen7013 Daniel, please study this further. Even EVs that run on 100% coal are cleaner than your average car. Cars are extremely inefficient in their use of energy, that ends up trumping everything and FTR our energy mix is getting cleaner every day. You must now this. Coal is now only 16% of America's power production. Even places like WY are replacing huge amounts of coal with wind.
I’m sorry but I don’t believe the ONE study in England that says brakes & tires are causing more pollution than exhausts. I need more evidence & studies that can replicate/reproduce this study’s results.
if heavy cars are causing this problem there should already be plenty of data to show it since massive stupid azz SUVs that weigh 500-1000 kilos more than a wagon/estate/touring have taken over the auto market in the past 20 years
As an old BMW fanatic I despise anything with a model name starting with X (maybe slightly less if its an E53 from which I can scavenge a shared part for one of my E39s) and I keep a barf bag in the driver door pocket in case I see one of those vile new ///XM monstrosities on the road
His guest Lomborg is a climate skeptic crank full of outdated misinfo.
EVs batteries are rapidly improving such that new EVs today are only 15% heavier than comparable sized ICE cars
Also his “pollution” from tires and brakes claim is bunk. EVs use brakes less than ICE cars due to regenerative braking
Then google it!
@@greebj Only in the US, where the rules are that light weight cars have to be fuel efficient but heavy ones don't. And... there IS plenty of data to show that SUVs kill lots more people than an equivalent number of smaller cars. So, a Swedish person worrying that now heavy vehicles are going to be more common in Europe makes total sense.
Lomborgs claim has two problems.
A) EV’s wear LESS not MORE on brake pads, thereby causing less pad dust pollution. Why? Because they mostly use regenerative braking, which unlike ICE cars does not depend upon brake pads, but instead uses the electric motor to slow the vehicle.
B)Also, his claim EVs are so much more heavy is no longer true either. Battery tech has been improving rapidly resulting in EVs today being only about 15% heavier on average than the equivalent size ICE car.
“Eva are heavy and pollute more break pads.” Doesn’t take into account regenerative breaking at all…
I think he was pointing out that ev's create more brake dust. But to your point my model S was making a sound from the rear brakes. Turns out it was the rotors but was very surprised after 400,000 miles I still had half of the pad left. Was very impressed.
@@word123456789100 that is Very imprssive if 400k is accurate. So is brake pad dust/smoke more toxic than standard vehicle?
@@word123456789100😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊
It's pretty obvious that if your brakes are still working after 400K miles, then they get used at least an order of magnitude less than in gas cars, thus polluting an order of magnitude less. The beauty of Regen...
@@xaspirate8060 you got me thinking and it looks like brake dust in a combustible car is no less harmless than the ones in my model s. So when he mentioned brakes on an EV, I was like okay he seems right. Because my EV wheels happen to get more dust on them than my other car. And this is even when I apply brake cleaner on my pads every month. So after looking it up you're right and the good statistician isn't using his data truthfully. Turns out I get more dust only because of the sheer weight of the car causes a larger amount to disperse at a single time which gets collected on the wheel. Where a combustible car omits less amount at one time but so much frequently because of not having regenerative breaks. Ironically the statistician was on the show to uncover certain data points when he did the exact same thing.
This guy is wrong about more brake wear from electric cars because regenerative braking reduces brake pad use, and brake pads last longer on electric cars than gasoline powered cars. Also, a lot of people are driving around in huge trucks and SUV anyway, which are heavier than smaller electric cars.
Tell me how regenerative brakes reduce brake wear.
I have no gas vehicles in my household, so all my miles are electric. I one pedal drive, and I rarely use my brakes so brake dust pollution is kind of over blown I think. How about we take away some of those oil subsidies and put them to battery R&D so we can get to cleaner batteries for our cars, cellphones, laptops, toothbrushes. Fyi cobalt is used in many applications in our modern world including refining oil into gas. It's used to remove impurities and make higher quality gas, reducing greenhouse gas emissions.
@@daveo.9172 so you’re driving a Tesla is what you’re saying.
@@vettelover695regenerative braking reduces the use & load on the brake pads, thus reducing wear The vehicle slowing-force is caused by the magnetic resistance in the generator rather than the friction between the disk & pad.
First I've heard of the environmental impacts of braking though
@@vettelover695 Regenerative braking reduces brake pad wear by using the vehicle's electric motor to slow down the car instead of relying solely on the traditional friction-based braking system. In regenerative braking, the electric motor operates in reverse, converting the vehicle's kinetic energy into electrical energy, which is stored in the battery. This process slows the vehicle down without needing the brake pads to create friction against the brake discs as much. Since the brake pads are used less frequently, they experience less wear and tear, extending their lifespan.
1. Those picketers in Canada 🇨🇦🇨🇦🇨🇦🇨🇦🇨🇦🇨🇦were blocking the border for TWO weeks. No cross-border traffic could get though. This includes American companies trying to deliver goods to Canada and vice versa.
2. They were warned many times to leave. They were affecting the livelihoods of others.
3. They had illegal weapons and a long list of other charges, including firearms misuse.
4. Because The Emergency Act was in place, our Government had the right to seize their accounts until they dispersed. This was the first time it was used. Only one time was a similar act invoked-It was the former War Measures Act. The War Measures Act was used in the 1970s due to a terrorist group in Canada, who kidnapped and killed a Canadian Cabinet Minister and a British diplomat.
5. These criminals (2 were arrested, charged, and convicted) were sentenced to 6.5 years in jail each.
Thanks for the context.
@@Chris_Stanley007 You’re welcome!
@@Chris_Stanley007 They had another charge to face, but they were found innocent of that charge. I won’t mention it since they were found not guilty, but it was the most serious charge.
They were a danger to the public and to the police (RCMP). They also had a pipe bomb. One of them (of 2 charged) got an extra six months for the pipe bomb. They are both banned from having firearms for life. Imagine the behaviour of both of them at the border that got them both convicted, with a lifetime firearms ban. They weren’t just holding signs up.
There were two men who faced charges, as I mentioned above. Once they were arrested, the rest of the crowd finally dispersed.
@@pro6703 Thanks again, I appreciate the information!
Fantastic show tonight !
P.S. Bill I got Covid once last year on December 22. And I can say, that it was no BS. I was 64. 5'9" 185. I can only imagine being stuck in a cold wet trench, and I had covid....I can easily understand how it could kill someone.
You're joking right? It was better than last week, but I'd give it a 3/10. He needs alternate voices. The circle jerk of tautology is *BORING*
ur a bot
"High walls, but big gates". Great expression.
Agreed
Gates are big enough now. We already take in more than a million legal migrants per year.
So big that there are no walls, right.
Trump 2024 yessir 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
It took me 15 yrs to secure a US immigrant visa
Bills losing his humor and finding his inner asshole
Care to elaborate? Or are you just another Bernie-licker who does this every Friday night with a new handle?
@@xaspirate8060 Palestine.
That’s known as JD now.
Turning 68 years old with no family and $100M does that to a man.
He's become one of those get off my lawn guys
Thank you Bjorn for speaking about maternal infant mortality!
Great show tonight, everyone has a sense of humor
Kudos to Brett for trying to defend Trump... Bill cannot realistically and Steph would have no part of it.
@@xaspirate8060 Brett's main complaint with Trump is he would rather it be him running the country. Minus the CNN/msnbc idiot filter, Trump's policies would sound sensible.
Regenerative Braking doesn't create brake dust.
Totally agree, Tesla brakes need replacement in 3-5 years. Compared to standard car would have 3-4 replacements. We have to start changing somewhere. EV cars will get better. True the mining for battery materials is not good, but everything has a cost either $, environmental or both. A bicycle, uses rubber, steel, aluminum, carbon fibre, hydraulic fluid for disc brakes. How far down should we drill to say something is bad for the environment.
Yes, but just regular brakes do. The regenerative aspect of brakes is only a portion.
But, he qualified that statement by adding that all cars have that issue.
@@martinsteele3259 This is absolute nonsense. People aren't replacing brakes on normal cars annually. Jesus, the rear drum brakes on my small car are still fine a decade later (I check them annually, and the rear brakes handle only a relatively small portion of the overall braking). How often you need to replace your brakes is directly related to how frequently you drive, the weight of your vehicle, the components used, and how you drive. As mentioned, many electric car owners use their EVs as occasional, tertiary cars for short errands. ANY car not driven often will not need its brakes replaced frequently. Unless you're driving highly aggressively, entirely within a city, for very long distances, NO ONE would be changing their brakes annually. Depending on driving habits and the components, brakes can easily last over 50,000 miles for an "average" driver.
Regenerative braking isn't some mystical cheat code; letting off the throttle in an automatic or simply engine braking with a manual transmission works similarly to slow a vehicle down without using the brakes by cycling the engine without adding fuel for combustion. It harnesses the friction of the moving engine to decelerate without using brakes. The only difference is that electric cars can recapture some of that energy as electricity. Internal combustion engines simply are not using fuel during that deceleration event since OBD2 has been around (~1996), so they still also save energy doing so. I have a small car with a manual transmission, so I predominantly use engine braking. Combined with the fact I mostly drive on the highway, I get well over 5 years on a set of brake pads on my front rotors, over twice that for my rear drums.
Electric cars are much, much heavier than an equivalent car, so any braking that is required is still going to be proportionally greater. Regenerative braking and decelerating in gear help SLOW a vehicle, but they don't stop it in normal driving (momentum is real). In both instances, you still need to apply the brakes to fully stop the vehicle at the appropriate time to maintain a safe flow within traffic patterns.
@@watchchimp3102 regenerative braking is 90% of the braking, at least w a Tesla hence only replace in 3-5 years
@@martinsteele3259 they last even longer than that. After five years, my brake pads are hardly worn at all.
Stephens is one good reason to drop your NYT subscription
@@michaelbayard1038 "Legendary DJT" ? Legendary as in the worst president of all time and a terrible human being at that 🤣
I did
Yep. He has lost all critical thinking. I did drop print subscription.
5:25 that's not correct, electric cars don't have old style car breaks.
One of the cool thing electric cars have is that they can reuse the energy that comes from the brakes to recharge their batteries.
Old car brakes turn that kinetik energy just into heat and plastic particles emitted from the iron/rubber of the car brake.
EVs mostly don't use mechanical brakes. They use regen brakes which produces energy that goes back into the battery so there is way less brake dust pollution. EVs are way better for the environment even in West Virginia. If you're only car is electric and you get most of your energy from solar, there's no argument. I've been all electric since 2011 and will never buy an ICE car again.
BRAKES
They still have brakes and tyres that need replacing
Ah yes tyres 😂
Your road trips must be pure hell
@@ryantogo8359 Why?
Great show and great guests!!!! I love your new rules this week!!!! 💓 Bill Maher!!!
ur a bot
@@user1oooify no, you are
I LOVE our Prius. We've had two!
My problem with this show: it's talking heads. Lithium is not necessarily dirty. California has a potential large reserve that would be a clean source of lithium: syphoning off the lithium from geothermal energy. The main thing about renewable energy is that you go to the energies that are good for that area (some areas in the US have a wind center, some solar, some geothermal). I'm in GA, and we just had the country's new nuclear facility. In TN, they are researching a cleaner and more efficient nuclear reactor that could usher in some more reactors in some areas.
Yes, as of all the gasoline just magically appears totally clean at the gas station. But gasoline is gone once you burned it. But the materials in batteries will be recycled to build new batteries.
12:25 - When she chimed in with “vaccines”, I thought Bill was going to lose it 😂
Quick give him a pacifier, the poor baby.
To point out tuberculosis death: The problem is not just lack of antibiotics but emergence of antibiotic resistant strains.
The cause of this disease is people won't vaccinate, ignorance is deathly in most cases.
How DELUSIONAL does ONE have to be to SAY that ASKING a PRESIDENTIAL candidate to ANSWER tough QUESTIONS is EXPECTING said CANDIDATE to be PERFECT...That is NEXT level GAS LIGHTING!!!
The delusional part is expecting Vice President Harris to meet that standard, but letting tRump slide by with, "I've got *concepts* of plans."
@@omicron2018no, the delusional part is your comment
been driving a hybrid car for 4 years - works great - drive by the gas station - have to stop in maybe twice a year to fill up - 2-gallon tank size. Plug into my home every day & have roof top photocell panels that were installed 12 years ago - so my biggest problem is listening to the haters cry about the price of GAS
Congratulations, you barely drive anywhere. No one cares about your sad little life.
Wrong on BEVS most of the materials are now recyclable, many of the batteries now do not have cobalt and nickel, they are mainly lithium, iron and phosphate.
The panel is not too sharp about electric cars.
faster because torque 🙃
Who cares. Tesla's are garbage.
Or crypto
@@DeltaVxx Provided the EV has a motor or motors that are providing at least an equivalent amount of power to weight as an ICE (Internal Combustion Engine) vehicle, the reason EV's are faster is...torque. Electric motors have maximum torque instantly and maintain maximum torque while accelerating. It varies quite a bit by vehicle depending on the transmission but, the power band of an ICE or internal combustion engine is typically around 4,000 RPM. That's where maximum torque gets produced, and it ends after reaching maximum power, that is, above 5,000 RPM but not above 7,000 RPM. EV's don't typically have transmissions. The motor drives the wheel(s) (depending on how many motors the vehicle has) directly so...Maximum torque right from 1 mile per hour, all the way up to top speed. An expert on this thread could fine tune my comment but, even though Bjorn Lomborg sounded unsure, he was 100% correct. Think about how an electric drill works. You pull the trigger and the drill bit instantly turns at its top speed. It takes an EV longer to get to top speed because of the weight, friction and wind resistance but the principal is the same.
Referring to emissions from brakes on electric vehicles is what made me cringe really hard.
This is the same woman who after interviewing KH said that KH didn’t give clearly defined answers on the issues because the issues aren’t clearly defined. Huh?
I pretty much only watch the monologue and New Rule. These are great guests, but the competition to get their blurb finished in the insanely brief amount of time available finally gets on my nerves.
Good for Bill! I also read the story about the Swedes paying them to leave. I had an au pair 30 years ago and she said they could not go topless to beaches safely anymore. Some do not assimilate.
@sharonblankenship6433 That might actually be a good thing. It isn’t that pretty TBH
This has to be the weirdest, word salad, reaction on this video! 🤪. Makes no point or sense at all. 👍
There is so much immigrant gang violence in Sweden now it is too dangerous to go to many cities. That’s why they are desperate to get rid of them.
Swedes had already started cutting back on going top less on beaches before the big immigrant waves.
Many do not.
Talking about brakes on an EV… he completely ignored regenerative braking. If I understand it correctly, it doesn’t use the brakes at all, but in effect engine braking so as to recharge the batteries a bit as you slow down/lift off the gas, rendering the life span of the normal brakes almost indefinite.
This guy doesn't know shit about EVs, and like Bill, I'm skeptical of the rest of his talking points. Lots of EVs have tech built in to prevent collisions. Some of them are heavy because of the batteries, but they're not heavier than your basic ICE pickup trucks that roam the US in great abundance. Those are the real killers of climate and humans. A Tesla Model 3 weighs 3550 lbs. That's a pretty normal weight for a small sedan in this day and age. A V6 Toyota Camry weighs more. The lightest Dodge RAM is 4765 lbs, the heaviest is 6440.
Agreed, this guy is far, far from being an expert.
@@OMGWTFLOLSMH exactly.
162,000 on my ev and brakes have never been changed! still look brand new.
You are correct as a previous owner of a 2010 Prius and a current owner of a 2015 Nissan Leaf and 2023 Chevy Bolt, I can tell you the brakes will last the life of the car. 95% of my driving is in town commuting and these vehicles work great for that. Love the no noise instant acceleration. The only problem Bill has is his lack of research. You never buy the first generation of any new technology (EV or ICE). I waited until the battery technology progressed on the Leaf so that the degradation due to heat in Louisiana was tolerable. And waited until they figured out why Chevy Bolts were catching fire. I must admit that I still own a reliable ICE Toyota Rav 4 for those long out of town trips 😊.
Covid was not a scam to those of us who lost loved ones.
First, I'm sorry for your loss. I think the big issue was the extreme rhetoric on each side. The far right didn't take it seriously enough, and the far left made everyone think that COVID was a death sentence for most people. The exaggeration on both sides made it difficult for people to understand the true scope of the issue, and therefore take well informed decisions.
Thank you!!
Walking to and from your table you must wear a mask. While sitting and eating you are not required to wear a mask. People think it was a bs because of rules like that.
The Vaccines where supposed to stop outbound transmission, and inbound contraction, and reduce the risk of a serious reaction. We now know what most of us already knew that all this was not true. People made billions of dollars in profit from the pandemic. A pandemic is supposed to be destructive not to a few but all. Many small business had to close down while the massive conglomerates made hand over fist as they where allowed to stay open.
The smoking gun is that air travel was not halted. One of the easiest ways to spread an air born disease is through air travel. If it was anywhere as serious as they where claiming it was they would of grounded every plane and docked every ship. That is in arguable. There is no reason that can be given to excuse this.
Bjorn Lomborg was inspiring about what we are capable of solving🎉
Yes more people need to tune into him versus the lunatics saying the world ends on the next New Years eve.
His guest Lomborg is a climate skeptic crank full of outdated misinfo.
EVs batteries are rapidly improving such that new EVs today are only 15% heavier than comparable sized ICE cars
Also his “pollution” from tires and brakes claim is bunk. EVs use brakes less than ICE cars due to regenerative braking
Unfortunately he was mostly talking crap. Evs are not a second car and the heavy bs was just weird.
Yes I’m a Dane and he is more interested in publicity than science
Bill, please have Victor Davis Hanson on your show.
Love this show..overtime is my second favourite part
1. Hybrids are great. Spoke to a guy who bought a hybrid and gets about fuel about once a month.
2. If we can produce Sodium Ion batteries instead of lithium. We have tons of sodium readily available.
Lithium is the 3rd most available element in the universe while sodium is the 11th most available (source: the periodic table). It’s not the availability that’s the issue, it’s how to extract lithium the right way (ie efficiently, yet environmentally friendly at scale) that makes things difficult. Look up Lithium Valley if you want to know more about this topic.
@@luke_cohen1 Hey thx for engaging and yes, I totally understand the periodic table, and the energy density of lithium vs. sodium, but sodium-ion is still emerging. If cost, safety, and environmental impact are your primary concerns, (those are my main concerns) sodium-ion batteries might be more suitable. They are advantageous for large-scale energy storage systems, such as those used in renewable energy installations. The low cost and improved safety make them a great option for grid storage and other applications where space and weight are less critical. Moreover, their better performance in cold temperatures can be beneficial for outdoor or unheated environments. In a Hybrid vehicle, where you charge your batteries using the chemical energy in your gas tank, this will drive down the vehicles cost and be less likely to overheat. And in Canada (where I am), it can get pretty cold. Thats where sodium ion batteries shine….:). Again, thansk for engaging. This is a great conversation topic and people need to understand the pros and cons of each. Cheers. PS - Im also a big big fan of MSR’s - (Molten Salt Reactors). Check out this company. They are doing some wild things. (www.terrestrialenergy.com)
If driving an electric vehicle is virtue signaling what does driving a car with a V8 signal?
That u can't afford to buy New.... ?😢
Perhaps if the Government forced companies to pay an honest wage rather than bringing in 3rd World country labour to do jobs that none of us could survive on the low wages the Industrialists are paying.
"We need tall walls and big gates" Huh...I like that, both the imagery and the philosophy.
The USA has the big gates. They are wide open and there is not much wall. Walls for security are like cooking, you gotta watch, else things get ruined.
The mining of minerals is nothing new because of electric cars. They've been mining all those minerals used in auto batteries for over a century. They use these minerals in all sorts of other applications.
Bill often ignores the facts. He's lazy that way
They don't and have never used lithium car batteries, Einstein
FYI=> Stephanie Ruhle spent 14 years in the finance industry. At Credit Suisse she served as a vice president and became the highest producing credit derivatives salesperson in the United States. At Deutsche Bank she was managing director of Global Markets.
🤮🤮🤮
…and?
Who gives a crap
@@ryantogo8359 She has an A+ brain that could run circles around DJT .. She knows things he could never understand. She rose to the top . DJT bankrupted to the bottom - getting convected of crimes...
@@robertblake60 She knows what she's talking about. DJT just repeats stuff he's read on X..... She has actually done things, made sales, completed contracts. She's the real thing. -- DJT is a con....
The thousands of tanker trucks delivering gasoline to gas stations daily weigh a lot more than any EV.
8:20 the back and forth here cracked me up 😂
Have you ever called a US embassy? I dare you to try and get someone on the phone . Immigration process is crap and has been for decades . Please try to call US embassy . Pick whatever nation you like and try to call, email , make appointment. Zero response . No one answers phone . So.... I am American and I understand why people ignore the legal route .
Baltimore, MD.
Yep. Fixing this is part of the big gate Bret talked about.
Phone call any business? Your gonna get a robot. Extremely difficult to get a human for help. Email them? Again, almost never get a response except, a thank you for contacting and we will get back to you.
Asking why they leave and helping them make real efforts in their own countries is too little discussed.
Sitting in a crappy place and pumping out so many children that none of you can stand it is just bad math.
@@dawnmaclearfitness Not our problem.
@@californiaslastgasp6847 clearly, it is
Electric vehicles are waaaayyy more efficient machines. Plus batteries are 100% recyclable.
It’s a scam. Sorry, you’ve been scammed.
"100% recyclable" is 100% not true at this point in time
It's barely even economical at this point to disassemble a battery pack to find and replace failed cells among the many hundreds still with usable lifespan. And that's just using 99% of what's still perfectly good battery hardware.
If you can invent the industrial process that can regenerate a battery at less pollution cost than making a new one, the world will love you for it (it doesn't matter even if it's not economical - governments have shown in abundance that EV subsidy doesn't have to make any fiscal sense whatsoever)
@greebj Recycling is been researched/developed as the market will be huge.
In China, the biggest market for cars, about every 4th new car is electric. I guess they'll stay world leader in this technology.
Tech keeps improving.....
Stephanie Ruhle is so witty and funny. Who knew? She rocked this show for me.
And she's hot 🔥
She never listened to anyone and was only waiting for her chance to speak. Unbearable.
@@guyfawkes8384lol 🫠
Stephanie ...? 🙂
IF you like BRAIN-less media parrot, repeating the anti-Trump, anti-Putin propaganda ...
BTW all over sudden Bill Maher went full INSANE Anti-Trump diatriabe , what happened?, did Bil get a urgent FAX from the WH, and the DNC HQ not to be too'smart' and go easy on ANTI-TRUMP propoganda, since the DeepState, BigState are now WORRYING that 'cackling' Kamala is not 'loved' enough ...
... and EVERYONE has to "pile on" Trumpster NOW, so OBEY or you be DELETED, CANCELLED ... 😞!
Me too!
"High walls, big gates." That's a good way to put it. ❤
“You don’t know how hard up he was.” 🫢 🤣🤣🤣
Great show and a great panel. Stephanie Ruhle is such a refreshing and intelligent contributor.
COVID was bullshit? Tell that to a healthcare worker who lived through the nightmare.
At first, it wasn't, but then the lies came cascading out of those bureaucrat's mouths, then it was.
Bill Maher is an unserious anti-intellectual diva, who's as self-absorbed, and as self-righteous, as Trump, and as most coastal elites are. I wouldn't put much stock in what he says, but still always remain aware of those with power, and influence.
Tell that to every person who lost a mother, father, aunt, uncle, brother, sister, grandmother grandfather, friend, coworker.
Covid was Bullshit doesn’t matter where you worked. Not the disease but the mandates were Bullshit lockdowns,masks and social distancing ect.
The reaction to covid was.
So, a comprehensive immigration law. Easy peasy. 😮
which should have been either 07 or 13.
Believe it or not, this used to be a common thing in US. They devised the right number to let in and it worked incredibly well.
They had it orange trash blew it up, does anyone read???
@@greenhometony Brainwashed and lobotomized, you are a great combination.
deportations only
its a shame that Stephanie Ruhle, whenever Bret Stephens was critical on Harris, always tried to turn the question around to being critical on Trump, which I think most of us are. Yet Stephanie Ruhle never answered the question regarding Harris
Brett Stephens gloats about the “innovation that immigrants bring”: Well, that might be the case with immigrants that come from some Asian countries [mainly with China, South Korea, and Subcontinental cradles [ostensibly being India] regarding those with decent educations and, perhaps, some wealth.
As it turns out Brett, diplomatically concurs with this by saying the problem for Europe/Britain is with the locals becoming dispossessed by these interlopers.
Tragically, when it comes to those millions of interlopers swarming into Britain, Europe and, INDEED, the US, from over a score of sociological, and economic crap heaps, ranging from the Middle East, and WORST of ALL, sub-Saharan Africa, the horrific reality is that hardly any of them could be remotely construed as beneficial. Indubitably, the severe detriments that have severely impacted upon Britain, Ireland, western Europe, and Scandinavia, from these ileducated, and unskilled interlopers is a horror to behold. With the most detrimental consequence being that the massive drug problems in these countries is due to them importing the vile subtances.
The reality of affairs is that, 90 percent of all those featherless bipeds that have fled from sub-Saharan countries in Africa, and invaded Britain in the past decade have NEVER had permanent employment. For the average poor, white British who are on the waiting list for state housing have to wait a minimum of 5 years, and up to 11 years: averaging out to be 7 years, and nine months. However, if you are a black African with an education equivalent to someone in year 8 in a western country, and have neither a skill - let alone any motivation to get a job and work hard - the waiting period for a permanent council flat is within a maximum of 12 months of arriving.
and she never will. her ilk have adopted just voting on vibes
Her answer was PERFECT. You don't need to know - or even AGREE with - everything about Vice President Harris, because you already know everything you need to know about how bad tRump is.
BTW, when is tRump dishing out the details about his "concepts of a plan?" Sometime in the next 2 weeks, right?
@@omicron2018 do not get me wrong, I think Trump is psychopath. As someone who is firmly a left-centrist, I find it increasingly annoying when a political commentator on the left cannot stand to hear anything bad or critical about the leftist politician they are currently cheerleading for
@@omicron2018that mentality is what will cause Trump to win in November. Enjoy the next 4 years!
Stephanie you did not disappoint! Knocked it out of the ballpark.
Sure, if you were hoping for a DNC cheer leader
Joke, right?
Electricity does actually come from a "fairy in the sky". It's called solar energy...
Not the precious metals that make that possible....you need mighty Dwarves to mine that stuff.
Not in the winter unless you live on the equator. Try to power a Tesla when the sun doesn't shine for a week because of snow storms.
And the minerals used to build solar panels and battery storage come from massive diesel powered machines..
EVs don't wear out brakes at all because they use regen braking instead. Heavier? It's not like 3 ton SUVs didn't already exist...
Mining lithium and cobalt is dirty unlike gas and oil which is clean as a spring meadow. Yeah right? Black is white and night is day. Yes it takes energy to make cars of all types, but EV's don't directly add millions of tons of CO2 to the atmosphere every year like combustion engines are designed to do. BTW, cobalt is being phased out rapidly as a component of EV's. Most are using lithium iron phosphate batteries which don't use cobalt at all.
So the minerals mined for phones, computers etc are that different from the minerals needed for EVs to function?
There are costs and benefits to everything. The idea that electric cars only have benefits and no costs is naive. Because of the complexity it can be difficult to compare, because you are not comparing apples to apples. The environmental damage from batteries is different than from fossil fuels. Increased CO2 isn't all bad either, there has been significant greening worldwide directly linked to the increased CO2 as it is plant food. Yes there are environmental costs from the burning of fossil fuels, but there are also costs from "green" energy.
At least they are trying new ideas to immigration. I think that is a good thing. We need new ideas to tackle these problems.
BS ALERT: the blond dude said EVs produce a lot more pollution from increased wear on brake pads because they’re heavier. Like most anti-EV horseshit flying around lately, that’s false. EVs use regenerative braking, so instead of wearing brake pads, much or most of the friction of braking is cleanly harvested to recharge the battery. That’s not pollution, that’s energy efficiency.
Loved the Dog that wont get into the car to go to the Vet reference .
The problem with that analogy is that Stephen's is already in the car. He's simply trying to advise on how to get the rest of the dogs into the car but they're so concerned with purity tests they can't even comprehend what he's saying so bill makes an analogy that is a false equivalency.
We like Stephanie, I miss woman like this - tough, beautiful, wicked sense of humor and gives as good and she takes!
Agreed, I never heard of her before but am a big fan now.
It's the New Jersey in her!😉
Wrong, arrogance makes a woman ugly
So tough she needs her husband to shoot an intruder. She sucks.
she tries too hard to be a poltiical Chelsea Handler.
The panel this week had very, very good opinions and was quite engaging and entertaining, especially Stephanie Ruhle. The guest, Bjorn Lomborg, also had good opinions but, in my opinion, sort of wandered before he reached a focus. I'd certainly like to see Bret Stephens and Stephanie Ruhle return soon to the panel.
Great show tonight!!
And mining the materials for batteries is pretty much a one-off for each car with the impact of mining for all the other things (steel etc) in common with IC engined cars. Production of the fuel to put into IC engined cars is orders of magnitude worse over the life of a vehicle.
People focus on CO2 over other environmental issues because CO2 is especially urgent. We can tackle climate change and then other issues once climate change has abated.
That said, electric cars are no substitute for public transit.
Can you have bus run by my house every hour 24x7 to places I might want to go?
@@stone-rock No, but there are cities that have adequate public transit for most hours of the day and it would be even better if more people didn’t resort to driving in the first place.
I like Bjorn. He understands that it is more about management versus hurtling towards the sun. AOC is already an invalid opinion because "five years later" I am typing this. He knows the game...so many "Gretas" out there trying to be heroic.
I find people have a tough time differentiating between broader climate issues and climate change specific problems. Even bill Maher was getting mixed up on this point when asking about the plastic in the ocean, when Bjorn was discussing CO2
@@DInDelusion I have to admit, Bill seemed a bit aggressive toward Bjorn tonight. In the past he listened to him intently. I do like that he is one of the few who talks about pollution management. There was a time when that was a big deal. Still is.
COVID killed millions tell them it was b.s.
But Bret... What about fracking, drilling, or mining coal? Isn't that fkng dirty ???
Bret Stephens making the argument that Harris should be answering more questions directly is making his argument in the most counterintuitive way possible. He's giving the perfect demonstration of why she shouldn't!! He has a very firm opinion on the particular issue he was raising and feels very strongly about what Harris' answer should be to it AND ALSO said he agreed he was planning to vote against Trump in absence of an answer to that question. Come on man if Harris was watching that clip you just convinced her what she's doing right now is the perfect strategy. I really wish people would stop confusing their personal desires with wise electoral strategy.
Tonight’s new rules was much needed.
I'm surprised the "EV Expert" did not mention that "Regenerative Braking" can stop an EV car without actually applying the brakes. He is not as informed as he makes himself to be ;)
Agreed. I rarely use breaks to stop the car. I have over 100k miles and they haven’t been replaced. He does have a point on the tires though. Not sure how much ends up in the air but they last about 60% as long as gas vehicles.
No he’s not- hence all of the ignorant things he says about crypto - I promise his understanding is only what he reads from a headline
Stephanie Ruhle is so CHARMING and SMART. What a delightful guest. ❤
She is just beautiful
She seemed very genuine, Brett did too, that's refreshing to see. But she had so much more charisma, wit and conviction. Brett has become kind of a p***y. She's definitely one of my favorite guests in a while.
So beautiful and smart and amazing smile with those alive eyes ... I have a mind crush in her 🎉
I like her smile and her relaxed manner.
@@HarrySatchelWhatsThatSmell She can't even smile naturally because of all the botox.. What are you talking about:)
Getting oil and gas isn't dirty? Mining ores for regular cars isn't dirty? Don't forget, electric cars also means no anti-freeze, no transmission fluid, no oil changes, no oil filters....
And hours to charge your car.
@@annchovey2089 if you drive a long way every day, then yeah, that might be a problem. But most people will just charge it at home overnight and it's fully charged the next day.
It's all dirty.....dirty, dirty, dirty
Stephanie needs to be a regular guest!!!! Talk about making my day Oh my God!
You would hate her if she was your boss though. Typical toxic femininity
Stephanie Ruhle is awesome and intelligent. Great to see her here
Hard to believe someone like Stephanie Rhule who calls herself a journalist thinks it’s acceptable for a major party candidate for president to answer no questions about where she stands in the issues. I don’t care what you think, Stephanie. I want to know where the candidates stand and if they aren’t ready to say they can’t be trusted and won’t get my vote.
The last time some blamed it all on the Jews was the guy with the mustache back in the thirties.
*someone
@@Sundae_Times Maher's an American. Yes?
And he was correct.
@@guyfawkes8384 < And that, ladies and gentlemen, is why siblings shouldn't be allowed to breed.
@@Sundae_Times Have you seen the world lately? The chaos? All of that has come from a small group of people who control everything.
The other side of the border bill- not strong enough? It was led by a conservative and could have dramatically changed immigration law for the first time in decades. It includes, for example, a new emergency authority to restrict border crossings if daily average migrant encounters reach a certain level, raises the legal standard of proof to pass the initial screening for asylum and expedites the asylum processing timeline. It was endorsed by the labor union that represents U.S. Border Patrol agents.
Everyone knows lasting change de requires legislation, not executive orders. - we all know why they tanked the border bill- give me a break.
Exactly!
Which “Conservative,” led it? All of those “new emergency authority” are things the President can already do and doesn’t require an act of Congress. “Restrict border crossings if daily average [crossings] reach a certain level?” So it codifies that we’re good with 5,000 illegal immigrants a day. That bill was absolute garbage.
@@VincenzoC749
Lankford from Oklahoma was the conservative who led the Feb 2024 bill.
It’s hard to take seriously any criticism on immigration when, on Trumps orders, the GOP tanked border bill that would expel migrants at the southern U.S. border and required stricter criteria for asylum seekers while providing over $20 billion in supplemental appropriations to various agencies, (DOJ,HLS) to bolster border security and combat fentanyl trafficking.
So then, what SPECIFICALLY do you consider “garbage” in the bill that The National Border Patrol Council - which represents more than 18,000 agents - said would “drop illegal border crossings nationwide and will allow our agents to get back to detecting and apprehending those who want to cross our border illegally and evade apprehension.”?
Trump's border policies from 2017-2019 were largely ineffective, resulting in the highest number of crossings in the decade.
Despite reallocating defense funds, Trump couldn't complete the promised wall, receiving bipartisan criticism.
His failed attempts prove that executive orders are not enough to solve the border issues, since many of his policies got struck down in court. And guess who got stuck paying the legal bills? The American taxpayer.
Ultimately, It was a health regulation that controlled the border numbers, not Trump strategy. The fact that he trashed the Feb 2024 Republican border bill shows how little he cares about solving this issue.
His policies lacked real impact, and it was the health measure, Title 42, not his strategy, that temporarily reduced crossings, prompted by his poor handling of the pandemic.
Real, lasting change requires legislation, which is why the Biden-Harris administration, worked across the aisle for border reform. Trump opposed a bipartisan bill, indicating a preference for keeping the issue alive in conservative media rather than solving it.
www.pbs.org/newshour/amp/politics/whats-in-the-senates-118-billion-border-and-ukraine-deal
@@GailChiarovano that border bill was an absolute disaster that would have done nothing but facilitate endless mass-migration until the country collapsed. That bill was absolutely garbage. Nothing in that bill was anything the president couldn’t already be doing if he wanted to.
@@GailChiarovano The bill was a sham to shift blame from Biden's inaction on the border for three years. Anyway, this was an interesting tidbit in the bill: "Provides that the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia has sole and original jurisdiction over any challenge arising from the Secretary’s authority to exercise the border emergency authority." Okay, let's give sole jurisdiction to a court that has 9 Democrat appointed judges and 4 Republican appointed judges. Hmm... gee, I wonder how they would interpret these new laws when challenged?
Stephanie Rhule is one of the most condescending journalists I’ve ever heard. She feels because she thinks Trump is bad she’s right and of course everyone feels the same. She assumes everyone is decided on what side they want to vote. She was so rude to your guest. Smart people don’t vote based on personality. They vote on policy. Everyone has a right to hear policies of both sides.
and stupid people vote for "concepts of a policy"
Personality MATTERS. Trump is a pathological liar, a malignant narcissist, and an unmitigated sociopath. It matters that he's a very damaged person. These traits should be obvious.
Swwwwssssww❤️
Stephanie was a blast. Bring her back more. I do like Bret as well.
Carlson interviewed a guy who thought Churchill was responsible for starting WW2. The podcaster interviewed did not deny the Holocaust.
Yeah, but he gave him a platform.
@@daviddavis2648 Andrew Roberts and others defended Churchill. Let the dissidents give their view.
I don’t think people buy an EV for $60-80 K and then don’t drive them
Bill managed to be tiresome even though he didn't have to manage his ineptitude at playing both sides of the political spectrum.
WTF are you talking about? Unlike yourself, he has always had the ability to look at an issue individually. He's unique in that he doesn't feel the need to tow the Party line. That is why he's been around for decades doing this. Leftists hate him now because they are aware of his influence and he does not cave to all of the silly BS.
@@xaspirate8060yup. Very unique. A atheist zionist 🙃
I have loved Stephanie Ruhle from her days on MSNBC. Such a babe!
Did the NYT actually call Oprah a legitimate journalist??!! 😂😂
OMG, he lost most credibility.
Trump said that he blocked the Bipartisan Border Bill because HE NEEDED AN ISSUE TO RUN ON.
He needed to keep the controversy alive…
Not true. That terrible Bill let in approximately 6,000+ people BEFORE the border was closed , making it useless
Source: trust me bro
@@ryantogo8359 Trump said it everywhere. You need to wake up and follow the news. I can’t hand deliver the news to all you sleeping people.
What great guests...love Stephanie ...so smart...more guests like this...
Stephanie kicked ass on this show!!! She has a spontaneous wit!!!! Funny!!!