Why not study up? For example, from a political/religious point of view. The contemporary world is currently split by a Protestant world view (Weber) and a now secularized simplification of Buddhist Mindfulness for self regulation (Foucault). Take the political upheaval Jordan Peterson has created through his pronoun critique of left wing politics. As a result we have a tribal mentality amongst many men with a few woman attaching themselves with his, I argue, heavily influenced, to the point of dogmatic, Christian analogy of Jungian's shadow side. Now compare this with the newly introduced secular mindfulness as a form of public pacification for a neoliberal political/economic structure. My connection of this split to that of the 'Ontological Turn' is in the need of the individual, through mindfulness practices, to look within and their connections to present awareness to the all inclusive connectivity with existence, instead of an other worldly external belief in a God. This, I argue, has many implications at a policy level in the make up of societies. Just where does power lie? And what does this do to those institutions reliant on Christian worldviews. In defense, secular mindfulness trainers will proclaim mindfulness is a universal human sense of being and thus those with other religions can merge their beliefs. But, again I argue, from the point of view of an Ontological Turn, the ontology of Mindfulness from its truly Buddhist foundations has vast complexities and nuances than those simply provided through contemporary psychology. Instead of simplifying contemporary mindfulness as Protestant Buddhism, rather we should be reflecting on the shift back to a more interconnective relationship with a grounded this worldly acceptance of reality, rather than the Protestant driven forms of colonialism which stripped many cultures of their this worldly relationship with existence. I don't know if this helps but Gabor Mate, a Marxist leaning academic/medical doctor for me helps to disconnect power structure from the individual and to rather explore the individual being with a greater connectivity with all that encompass the notion of being. Although he is still encaged by his medical training to insure he sounds sane. th-cam.com/video/66cYcSak6nE/w-d-xo.html&ab_channel=TEDxTalks
Well, biosphere was the last thing that needs clarification in this video
hard to clarify things that make no sense though
Interesting. Thank you - I’ve just finished an MA thesis on Being and Time and the internet and this rings a few bells …
Interested to read if this is published anywhere
Reminds me of Sartre's phenomenological view on the essence of humans in his claim "existence precedes essence"
Why not study up? For example, from a political/religious point of view. The contemporary world is currently split by a Protestant world view (Weber) and a now secularized simplification of Buddhist Mindfulness for self regulation (Foucault). Take the political upheaval Jordan Peterson has created through his pronoun critique of left wing politics. As a result we have a tribal mentality amongst many men with a few woman attaching themselves with his, I argue, heavily influenced, to the point of dogmatic, Christian analogy of Jungian's shadow side. Now compare this with the newly introduced secular mindfulness as a form of public pacification for a neoliberal political/economic structure. My connection of this split to that of the 'Ontological Turn' is in the need of the individual, through mindfulness practices, to look within and their connections to present awareness to the all inclusive connectivity with existence, instead of an other worldly external belief in a God. This, I argue, has many implications at a policy level in the make up of societies. Just where does power lie? And what does this do to those institutions reliant on Christian worldviews. In defense, secular mindfulness trainers will proclaim mindfulness is a universal human sense of being and thus those with other religions can merge their beliefs. But, again I argue, from the point of view of an Ontological Turn, the ontology of Mindfulness from its truly Buddhist foundations has vast complexities and nuances than those simply provided through contemporary psychology. Instead of simplifying contemporary mindfulness as Protestant Buddhism, rather we should be reflecting on the shift back to a more interconnective relationship with a grounded this worldly acceptance of reality, rather than the Protestant driven forms of colonialism which stripped many cultures of their this worldly relationship with existence. I don't know if this helps but Gabor Mate, a Marxist leaning academic/medical doctor for me helps to disconnect power structure from the individual and to rather explore the individual being with a greater connectivity with all that encompass the notion of being. Although he is still encaged by his medical training to insure he sounds sane. th-cam.com/video/66cYcSak6nE/w-d-xo.html&ab_channel=TEDxTalks
What is non-human people?
Rewatch from 1:30
Ok you are marxist, we get it
give me a book deal
@@DM-ks1pj spoken like a true philosopher
Sandwiches are political
Pokemon is political
Sand is political
Literally nothing talk and a bastardisation of ontology
Je hebt t kennelijk niet echt begrepen
please say more.
This is nonsense