Paul Clement • Why Ancelotti let the Chelsea players decide their tactics • CV Stories
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 15 ก.พ. 2019
- SUBSCRIBE to Coaches' Voice: bit.ly/2UCwkxX
Paul Clement looks back at Chelsea's double in 2010 where Carlo Ancelotti let the players decide their tactics for their FA Cup Final against Portsmouth.
Homepage - www.coachesvoice.com/
Twitter - / coachesvoice
Facebook - / coachesvoice
Instagram - / coachesvoice
#terry #ancelotti #chelsea - กีฬา
Ancelotti is the perfect example of how to build team spirit.
it was a very mature team also, with strong players and with tons of experience
W8ll this happen at everton
I miss Ancelotti at Chelsea so much man, the attacking prowess of the 2009/10 side was phenomenal and none of the Chelsea sides could match 09/10.
Carlo was sacked too early into his career at Chelsea. I'll say the same for José first season and Conte aswell.
I agree. Carlo finished second in his last league season. Horrible decision by the board. He would have probably made chelsea champions league winners more than once.
Ingty 22 especially with that team they had then. Chelsea’s expectations are too high most managers wouldn’t last more than 2 full seasons.
We sack great managers for fun
I agree, but do you think Chelsea would have won the UCL if he stays? I don't think so. Besides, Ancelotti had this reputation of doing great in his first two seasons then after that, they won't win sh*t.
@C41 Ancelotti's first season was 2002-03 with Milan. They won the UCL that year. Followed by Scudetto the following year. After that, choke the UCL final in 05, goes trophyless. Then in 06, another trophyless year. In 07, he managed to get it right and won the UCL. That would be his last major trophy for Milan until he leaves at 09 for Chelsea. So as you can see, he had that reputation, that Milan team under-achieved in his tenure. 1 League title and 2 UCL's in 7 years, with that squad of prime Shevchenko, Kaka, Inzaghi, Seedorf, Pirlo, Gattuso, Nesta, Dida then veterans like Maldini, Cafu, Rui Costa is disappointing. The same goes with his Chelsea tenure ( although he was sacked in his 2nd season cause he goes trophyless again ) then at Real Madrid also.
That's what I would do too. You can't coach players how to react correctly in every moment of the game. During a game, I watch a team play and wonder why they keep making the same dumb pass down the flank or the same cross that keeps failing all throughout the game, and want to blame the players. Then I realize the players have been taught to pass in this sequence and they're just following orders.
It's better that players are taught to make decisions themselves from moment to moment. You give them the bare instructions - maybe tell them how to set up - possession football or defensive football - but they have to know what to do themselves to win the game. They have to adapt to the phase of the playing. Maybe they are behind and short of goals, in which case they should know to take their chances more, start attacking the goal more with 20-meter shots at the goal.
Or maybe they are two goals ahead, and the other team are closing down on them, making tons of attacks. They should then cool off the playing, and maybe play possession football to keep possession away from the other team ...
It would be good if the team could think for themselves instead of you, as a coach, having to think for every player.
That's why I, as a coach, would select only players with good decision making ability as players. This would be more important than things like build, power, pace and so on.
There's no point having someone as a player who is athletic but doesn't have a smart bone in his body.
I would coach the players to solve problems themselves. I heard that that's what Mourinho would teach his Porto team to do.
I would do the same. I would pose a series of problems to them on the training pitch and get the players to solve them. Once they get into the habit of doing this - thinking for themselves and then choosing the right action for a given situation - they will be able to make the right decisions on the football field, and make the fine adjustments they should make from moment to moment.
Of course, there would be a lot of team coordination involved as well. If players are taught to play selflessly and watch out for team mates and make decisions that benefit the team and not themselves, you will get good teamwork out of the players.
So they work with a hive mind but at the same time each individual thinks through solutions themselves. I guess they would have to have excellent communication to work like this. And a leader on the pitch is important too.
I think players would love this. They get involved in the logistics of the game and can contribute their ideas instead of being treated like robots. They would understand what the coach is trying to achieve and they would be more engaged in the outcomes and how to achieve them, and players can come up with ingenuous ideas themselves.
Of course the coach must have the upper hand. Some players have dumb ideas or they want to play in a way that suits themselves without it necessarily being good for the whole team.
I suggest the coach give the players some freedom but give them guidelines as well.
By then he had already built the foundations of how he wanted the team to play.
He probably asked them to decide what tactics they wanted to use, because he knew they would have chosen something they already practiced at length before.
Nice one! Thanks for sharing
As a coach, the hardest thing I have to do is getting 11 different players on a same page.
Cool video
It was an injustice that Ancelotti was sacked. It wasn't his fault Chelsea's transfer policy is the a huge reason that they can't get any consistency
Carlo Ancelotti......Legend
Makes a lotta sense now when he is winning at Real
Makes sense
The more responsibility they can take the better, but I doubt if you lose, those players will come out and say that we are the one's who chose the game plan and it's our fault we lost. My guess is, especially at clubs like chelsea, the manager will take the L. And the players will say, "he's not qualified to coach us. We know the game more than him".
Without being disrespectful, but cmon...They were playing Portsmouth for crying out loud.
Portsmouth had won the fa cup a year before that so they were not the worst team ever
@@tylerobrien1468 they had financial problems.
1:02 Cos it sure is shit ain't gonna be deafening at Stamfuck Bridge