Tarot Scaling is AMAZING! | Gold Stake Green Deck | Balatro
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 18 พ.ย. 2024
- Ball At Ro
You can find jorbs shirts and hoodies at: www.bonfire.co...
If you enjoy these videos please consider dropping a like to help promote it to search algorithms. If you'd like to join the community of people who support me making content like this you can do so via:
Discord: / discord
Twitch: / jorbs
Patreon: / jorbs
Twitter: / joinrbs
(Or by Subscribing to TH-cam here :D). - เกม
I love how obsessed chat is on knowing Jorbs opinion on the game lmao, hes been playign it enough to try and beat the HARDEST difficulties. Let him vibe
its the conflicting messages that get me: so far I have heard from him multiple comments about how the game is poorly designed, dislike of high variance, his grumble near the beginning, etc. Compared to what you have outlined above I'm just left confused. Why is everything so negative when it is positive? It's just all riddles in the end and is... concerning? So yeah, basic empathy kicks in. Somewhere in my ramble is half an insight.
@@GezbianGaming He likes the game enough to be playing it so much clearly, but he has several criticisms as well, a perfectly normal thing. Why does it have to be all or nothing? Like if he has one issue with it then he must hate it or if he likes it then it must be perfect. Nothing exists in that space. He wants to play the game, that's it.
9:33 "I dunno, Space Joker kinda betrayed me last time"
Lmao.
The reason flushes have a different scaling level than straight flushes is because leveling up better hands ups their numbers by more per level than worse hands. So sure, a level 10 flush is better than a level 3 straight flush, but the straight flush would catch up with just a couple more levels.
these are some interesting comments- been having a lot of fun with the balatro though recently thanks jorbs!
Played this game 10+h/day last week, very addictive at first and really frustrating on higher stakes. I was wondering what I was doing wrong. In STP I'm learning from my mistakes, and here it's often "Yeah bad first shops... Yeah discarded 3 times, played 4 hands targetting a flush..." I know there's still room for improvement in my decisions, but I feel more than half of my losses are just bad luck
Jorbs hearting the bot comments, damn near choked on my drink.
First card triggered is arbitrarily manually positional. In the The Club round @07:50 when you Luckied the Queen, since all cards counted, if you manually dragged the lucky Q to the left of the Ace, then submitted the hand, it would have gone off twice (and had done the lucky chances twice).
I'm really not sure if the resetting is necessary to get consistent results, but I must confess that I have only beaten purple stakes (and lost a few times in the process too). I think you can salvage many runs, even on high stakes, through bad luck, but it will be difficult and require really tight play. How high of a win rate is possible is something I have no idea of yet though.
That said, if your goal is, like Jorbs' goal seems to be, to beat all decks in gold stakes at least once, the resetting is definitely the best strategy for getting through it quickly.
I'm currently just playing on mid stakes, trying out different strategies and figuring out the game in order to try to get more consistent wins later. Really interested to see how well you can actually do on high stakes. Definitely better than we're seeing here, but it seems unlikely that you can get high win streaks on gold stakes for now. But maybe it's possible. We don't know yet.
Not sure if having Space Joker is bad per se. It's high variance in the short term, but over a longer run it will just give a relatively consistent output, assuming you get to play a bunch of hands.
I have to say I enjoy the game playing myself, and Id love to watch it here but its incredibly hard to follow. In StS you have every card effect visible on screen, while here you just see the joker pictures but not the effects. Since Jorbs plays so fast it becomes a real chore to pause constantly to get a glimpse at the card effects. Maybe that gets easier when I know my way around the game better, but for beginners or people who dont know the game at all its probably not very enjoyable.
!relic
That's very fair. I was playing the demo for this game in the month before its official release so I got fairly well acquainted with a lot of the cards' effects, and then again after release, but I suppose that makes it difficult to consider what the experience is like for people who haven't spent as much time with it. If you'd want to bother with the effort, they've made a google sheet with a list of all the jokers and their effects here, but I also totally get not wanting to.
docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1w7Dp5F2h7Kp3_59iTjKgHpWmk1cskxm5wTC5bouYYuw/edit
I've seen a lot of youtubers start to play this, and as someone who hasnt played this, i cannot really follow what is happening at all, while i usually figure it out quickly enough for other games. Feel pretty stupid on this one haha,
@49:06 I don't understand discarding the Bonus card king of hearts
Why was he resetting so much there? Like he had two-pairs and even straights. Am I just missing something or is that not just good enough?
its not worth playing the run out if you dont oneshot the first blind with a highscore
Oh. Why is that?@@SkyTheStarhero
You lose out on an extra dollar if you don’t one shot the first round, and that one dollar makes a big difference that early.
This is a cosy game
"Incredibly high variance in the first fight"
You mean that sometimes you miss a dollar if you don't hit 300?..
And also missing a dollar can be a huge deal in the 1st shop
if you miss full house and have to play two pair you make ~100 points off that two pair, so it's a lot more than missing a dollar, you're then in a situation where you need another 200 points in 3 hands with no discards or you lose the entire run. then you go to the first shop and there is a fairly good chance that losing $1+ stops you from getting the purchase you wanted, which snowballs immensely over the rest of the run. a lot of the jokers in the game are going to generate $25+ in the next six rounds if you manage to buy them from the first shop. like, >50% of the jokers you can see in the first shop, probably.
on gold stake not one-shotting the small blind (or two-shotting the big or boss after skip) cuts your win% massively and basically makes the rest of the run not worth playing
@@darrellforbes5082hm, haven't played on gold stake but I wonder why?
Yeah I think this is why I've heard so much praise of the Blue Deck (and likewise why Black is so damning especially at high stakes), because missing even just 1 hand gives you less health, less time to draw and play winning hands, less money for winning, and less opportunity space to use things like tarot cards, money gen, or scaling jokers. Total hands are damn near everything in this game, even more than playing high ranking poker hands like 4oak or straight flush