Wow, I thought I had watched every one of Colin's tutorials. Tonight I was working on a project, where I needed a Picture-In-Picture effect, and every time I was bringing in this PIP sequence onto my main timeline, it was bringing in the *pieces* of the sequence but not the sequence itself as a whole ( a single unit ). The the rescue .... I find Colin's tutorial ! Turns out - there's a tiny button that you can easily click by accident, causing this to happen. THANKS to Colin for putting together this beyond amazing tutorial and how to fix that issue ( it was an issue for me ) but is actually a feature wanted by many ! Anyway, wow, so glad Colin's tut was out there for me tonight. Another video secret *revealed* I'm a happy camper ! Thank you Colin and Video Revealed !
Great job showing what you can do with Premiere! I needed an aspirin after that one. Is a sub sequence part of a sequence that you can edit and changes will show in the sequence?
I often shoot with multiple cameras (plus separate sound) which I sync with the audio scratch tracks in Pluraleyes. Once I have all the clips synced on a timeline, I'd like to be able to export all those audio tracks into an Audition multi-track session. This would give me the chance to sweeten the separate sound track with environmental sound from the camera scratch tracks. I've only tried to do this a few times but, if I remember correctly, the sound comes into Audition as a single stereo track. Perhaps this is a result of creating a sequence with a stereo master. Have you done a tutorial on this kind of round-tripping using the "adaptive" type sound tracks?
I've yet to work with multi-channel audio in Premiere Pro, but I can definitely see the power of this feature. Now, I just need to remember that it's there when the need arises. :)
This helped me solve a problem I'm having now. Thank you. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think Angus Wall has never edited a feature film on Premiere. The last feature he edited for Fincher, with Baxter was in fact edited on FCP7, right?
That depends on how "cheap" the microphone is, the environment it's being recorded in and who is operating it. An expensive microphone that is poorly placed will sound crappy and an "okay" quality microphone will sound better if it's placed correctly. I've heard good sound with a $250 lapel mic, but you have to place it correctly and that's a whole job on its own. I use an overhead boom mic so I never worry about picking the sound of my clothes rustling.
Youre Amazing for teching us all of these hidden, refreshing abilities Premiere could offer us! Truly a breath of fresh air :) For me, this was quite an elaborate idea to understand (functionalty wise). id guess this tool/method is there so we can make alternative cuts to a certain scene. only thing is to know how to move that alternate cut into the main editing sequence and switch between the two options. anyways, this feels like it fits huge feature film projects (which i dont do), but it may be very handy to know down the road :)
O.K. I have a weird question not related to the video topic but it regards your timeline. Your timelines always look complex and have so many tracks in them. I'm super curious what is in those tracks and how their layering works. For example, at about 5;00 or there abouts into the time line you have 4 video tracks and 7 audio tracks with content. I'm thinking V1 is the clip, V2-3 are graphics and V9 is a transparent/adjustment layer -- wait, I see that V9 is a matte layer. Hmm.. A color shift by lowering it's opacity. I doubt it since there are better ways of color management. And I never see a ton of graphics in your project window so I"m probably wrong about V2-3. But the audio really has me stumped. A1 - clip recording, A2-3 are copies of that audio (really curious about that), A6, A8, A10 are ambient audio? (This point in the timeline is at the first audio clip in A9.) At 1;22;00 or there abouts there are 4 video tracks with content and 8 audio tracks??? :) So much layered audio - what's in them? In the video it looks like you have moved the clip to V5 and then added three graphics or similar to V1-3. I'm thinking maybe the clip has been masked maybe to reveal the graphic layers? (This point in the timeline is just after the audio ends on A8.) I have other questions about content on the timeline but those are enough questions as it stands. **chuckle** Thanks for all your great videos. I can't say how much I've learned from you.
The timelines in this tutorial were from the documentary called "Waiting for Lightning" which I did not work on. This was a demo Project I used when I worked for Adobe and it's useful when I need something very busy.
Interesting feature that I think is best used when you are editing a scene in a multitude of ways. That does happen quite a bit. Removing lines and adding cut aways and pacing changes so this feature would come in handy for sure. ON an unrelated note I was wondering if you had ever tried to testing out Premiere using RAW footage ... it seems Premiere has some challenges for certain RAW formats Tom Antos has a short segment which illustrates this anomaly . Perhaps you can let us know if this kind of issue is common ??? th-cam.com/video/JaZaunv38Fw/w-d-xo.html
I remember when I noticed this feature. I use it when editting short films or TV shows pretty much anything with multiple complicated scenes. I can edit each scene individually, than put it all together and connect them. It's great. You. And great videos btw, but your videos don't need to be so long.
@@VideoRevealed I'm constantly surprised at the pressure to condense videos to ever shorter lengths. This is a complicated feature and I'd have to replay it a few times to jot down notes on it, yet 10 minutes is too long? I couldn't possibly see it coming in at less time. It's 10 minutes...
@@Terranscapes the whole audio channel part is not related to that feature, i would have explained that button in 3 mins tops, this was just to add screen time for monetization
can i download it from site or use affter effect compalsary?? sory for my wrong english because i don't have an idea of grammer and my mother tounge is hindi..
Yes I always have it on for editing and export. GPU acceleration will render certain effects faster than using the CPU. Not everything is GPU accelerated but for anything that is, it's faster. Watch this: th-cam.com/video/5_hjEGyANe0/w-d-xo.html
That's not exactly correct; it's only in very rare cases that quality will suffer. If you have a specific case you'd like me to check with the engineers, please let me know.
Absolutely incorrect information about Media Encoder. The top media companies in the world (who I've worked with personally) count on Media Encoder for output EVERY SINGLE DAY! Every broadcast preset was created with broadcast engineers from companies like the BBC. And just so you know, I'm not just some guy on TH-cam; I worked for Adobe for over 17 years and I have a giant list of customers that are perfectly satisfied with Adobe's quality output.
Wow, I thought I had watched every one of Colin's tutorials. Tonight I was working on a project, where I needed a Picture-In-Picture effect, and every time I was bringing in this PIP sequence onto my main timeline, it was bringing in the *pieces* of the sequence but not the sequence itself as a whole ( a single unit ). The the rescue .... I find Colin's tutorial ! Turns out - there's a tiny button that you can easily click by accident, causing this to happen. THANKS to Colin for putting together this beyond amazing tutorial and how to fix that issue ( it was an issue for me ) but is actually a feature wanted by many ! Anyway, wow, so glad Colin's tut was out there for me tonight. Another video secret *revealed* I'm a happy camper ! Thank you Colin and Video Revealed !
Always happy to help buddy!
I love learning new things about Premiere, even though I doubt I would regularly use this feature, its good to know its there
Thanks for watching.
Great job showing what you can do with Premiere! I needed an aspirin after that one. Is a sub sequence part of a sequence that you can edit and changes will show in the sequence?
A Subsequence is just a new independent Sequence. It's no longer connected to the original Sequence it came from.
I often shoot with multiple cameras (plus separate sound) which I sync with the audio scratch tracks in Pluraleyes. Once I have all the clips synced on a timeline, I'd like to be able to export all those audio tracks into an Audition multi-track session. This would give me the chance to sweeten the separate sound track with environmental sound from the camera scratch tracks. I've only tried to do this a few times but, if I remember correctly, the sound comes into Audition as a single stereo track. Perhaps this is a result of creating a sequence with a stereo master.
Have you done a tutorial on this kind of round-tripping using the "adaptive" type sound tracks?
You can send the whole Sequence to Audition, then render it back to Premiere Pro. Check out this tutorial: th-cam.com/video/OthNCg30lpU/w-d-xo.html
I've yet to work with multi-channel audio in Premiere Pro, but I can definitely see the power of this feature. Now, I just need to remember that it's there when the need arises. :)
Yes, the audio is very dense in Premiere Pro.
This helped me solve a problem I'm having now. Thank you. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think Angus Wall has never edited a feature film on Premiere. The last feature he edited for Fincher, with Baxter was in fact edited on FCP7, right?
you are my editing teacher.
I have a question, do we need expensive microphone to get clear voice or we can improve it perfectly in post.
That depends on how "cheap" the microphone is, the environment it's being recorded in and who is operating it. An expensive microphone that is poorly placed will sound crappy and an "okay" quality microphone will sound better if it's placed correctly.
I've heard good sound with a $250 lapel mic, but you have to place it correctly and that's a whole job on its own. I use an overhead boom mic so I never worry about picking the sound of my clothes rustling.
just love your channel!! thank you =)
You're welcome and thanks for your support.
Youre Amazing for teching us all of these hidden, refreshing abilities Premiere could offer us! Truly a breath of fresh air :)
For me, this was quite an elaborate idea to understand (functionalty wise). id guess this tool/method is there so we can make alternative cuts to a certain scene. only thing is to know how to move that alternate cut into the main editing sequence and switch between the two options. anyways, this feels like it fits huge feature film projects (which i dont do), but it may be very handy to know down the road :)
This feature is not meant to work with the Main Sequence but rather allow a quick way to move segments to a new edit.
Haha. I accidentally turned this feature on last week. I couldn't figure out how to insert a sequence as a nest. Interesting.
You're not the only person to accidentally do that.
O.K. I have a weird question not related to the video topic but it regards your timeline. Your timelines always look complex and have so many tracks in them. I'm super curious what is in those tracks and how their layering works.
For example, at about 5;00 or there abouts into the time line you have 4 video tracks and 7 audio tracks with content. I'm thinking V1 is the clip, V2-3 are graphics and V9 is a transparent/adjustment layer -- wait, I see that V9 is a matte layer. Hmm.. A color shift by lowering it's opacity. I doubt it since there are better ways of color management. And I never see a ton of graphics in your project window so I"m probably wrong about V2-3.
But the audio really has me stumped. A1 - clip recording, A2-3 are copies of that audio (really curious about that), A6, A8, A10 are ambient audio? (This point in the timeline is at the first audio clip in A9.)
At 1;22;00 or there abouts there are 4 video tracks with content and 8 audio tracks??? :) So much layered audio - what's in them? In the video it looks like you have moved the clip to V5 and then added three graphics or similar to V1-3. I'm thinking maybe the clip has been masked maybe to reveal the graphic layers? (This point in the timeline is just after the audio ends on A8.)
I have other questions about content on the timeline but those are enough questions as it stands. **chuckle**
Thanks for all your great videos. I can't say how much I've learned from you.
The timelines in this tutorial were from the documentary called "Waiting for Lightning" which I did not work on. This was a demo Project I used when I worked for Adobe and it's useful when I need something very busy.
@@VideoRevealed Thanks for the info. :)
Interesting feature that I think is best used when you are editing a scene in a multitude of ways. That does happen quite a bit. Removing lines and adding cut aways and pacing changes so this feature would come in handy for sure. ON an unrelated note I was wondering if you had ever tried to testing out Premiere using RAW footage ... it seems Premiere has some challenges for certain RAW formats Tom Antos has a short segment which illustrates this anomaly . Perhaps you can let us know if this kind of issue is common ??? th-cam.com/video/JaZaunv38Fw/w-d-xo.html
Premiere Pro only accelerates _some_ Cinema DNG formats and that's probably what he's experiencing.
Angus is a kool guy. His mom was a big influence on us when we were kids.
OH yeah. I'd hang out with Angus all day if he'd let me .
I remember when I noticed this feature. I use it when editting short films or TV shows pretty much anything with multiple complicated scenes. I can edit each scene individually, than put it all together and connect them. It's great. You. And great videos btw, but your videos don't need to be so long.
Thanks. I really try to only add useful information but I'll keep that in mind.
@@VideoRevealed I'm constantly surprised at the pressure to condense videos to ever shorter lengths. This is a complicated feature and I'd have to replay it a few times to jot down notes on it, yet 10 minutes is too long? I couldn't possibly see it coming in at less time. It's 10 minutes...
@@Terranscapes the whole audio channel part is not related to that feature, i would have explained that button in 3 mins tops, this was just to add screen time for monetization
Do you have a web ?
www.videorevealed.com
can i make rocket launcher and guns effect in adobe premier pro cc..
No, there is no way to generate those effects in Premiere Pro.
can i download it from site or use affter effect compalsary??
sory for my wrong english because i don't have an idea of grammer and my mother tounge is hindi..
Bro u can make all this stuff in after effects
Checkout videocopilot. This guy was awesome
very informative great tut
Thanks.
do you always do final render to master file with Mercury Engine (CUDA) or not? and what the advantages and disadvantages with or withour CUDA. thx :)
Yes I always have it on for editing and export.
GPU acceleration will render certain effects faster than using the CPU. Not everything is GPU accelerated but for anything that is, it's faster.
Watch this: th-cam.com/video/5_hjEGyANe0/w-d-xo.html
+VideoRevealed Wow, thx!. Lots of information there :D. Oh btw can you do the video about Optical Flow vs Frame Sampling vs Frame Blending. thx!
That's not exactly correct; it's only in very rare cases that quality will suffer. If you have a specific case you'd like me to check with the engineers, please let me know.
Absolutely incorrect information about Media Encoder. The top media companies in the world (who I've worked with personally) count on Media Encoder for output EVERY SINGLE DAY!
Every broadcast preset was created with broadcast engineers from companies like the BBC.
And just so you know, I'm not just some guy on TH-cam; I worked for Adobe for over 17 years and I have a giant list of customers that are perfectly satisfied with Adobe's quality output.
Here ya go: th-cam.com/video/dOazsNVxYFI/w-d-xo.html
Just curious.... what part of the county do you live in?
Near Toronto, Canada.
Wish you were in San Diego...
Very informative. Just when you think Premiere kicked enough butt, they hit overdrive.
Thanks.
Interesting. At the moment, and I’ll get there, I’m unsure why you would do this. But hay, I’m a newbie.
It's a very advanced feature and I rarely use it but it's very useful for anyone working on long Sequences with many tracks and different versions.
VideoRevealed I probably should have said “how I’d use it”. I think I’ll do some research on this technique.
Tony Hawk. Awesome.
If you haven't seen the movie, "Waiting for Lightning" you have to see it, it's incredible.
the KEM was FILM based not tape based
Sorry I messed that up and thanks for keeping me on my toes.
кто нибудь переведите на русский его уроки!! Плиззз
Я только один парень делает бесплатные учебники так субтитров не доступен.
I really useful your lessons. But many do not understand (((. Thenk you I like your lessons
Nikolay Balakhnov зачем? Кому надо и так все понимают