The Power of Big Oil Part One: Denial (full documentary) | FRONTLINE

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 14 พ.ค. 2024
  • Watch part one of “The Power of Big Oil,” a three-episode FRONTLINE docuseries investigating the fossil fuel industry’s history of casting doubt and delaying action on climate change.
    This journalism is made possible by viewers like you. Support your local PBS station here: www.pbs.org/donate.
    Go inside the decades-long failure to confront the threat and increasing impacts of climate change in “The Power of Big Oil.” This deeply researched docuseries reveals what scientists, corporations and politicians have known about human-caused climate change for decades, and the missed opportunities to mitigate the problem.
    Parts two and three of “The Power of Big Oil” premiere April 26 and May 3 on PBS and online: to.pbs.org/3rByEEe
    “The Power of Big Oil” is a FRONTLINE Production with Mongoose Pictures in association with BBC and Arte. The series producer is Dan Edge. The producer and director of episode 1, “Denial,” is Jane McMullen. The editorial consultant is Russell Gold. The senior producers are James Jacoby and Eamonn Matthews. The executive producer for FRONTLINE is Raney Aronson-Rath.
    #ClimateChange #BigOil #Docuseries
    Love FRONTLINE? Find us on the PBS Video App, where there are more than 300 FRONTLINE documentaries available to watch any time: to.pbs.org/FLVideoApp
    Subscribe on TH-cam: bit.ly/1BycsJW
    Instagram: / frontlinepbs
    Twitter: / frontlinepbs
    Facebook: / frontline
    FRONTLINE is produced at GBH in Boston and is broadcast nationwide on PBS.
    Funding for FRONTLINE is provided through the support of PBS viewers and by the Corporation for Public Broadcasting.
    Additional support for FRONTLINE is provided by the Abrams Foundation, the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, Park Foundation, the Heising-Simons Foundation; and the FRONTLINE Journalism Fund with major support from Jon and Jo Ann Hagler on behalf of the Jon L. Hagler Foundation, and additional support from Koo and Patricia Yuen.
    Funding for "The Power of Big Oil" is provided by The WNET Group’s Peril and Promise initiative, reporting on the human stories of climate change, with major funding by Dr. P. Roy and Diana T. Vagelos and additional funding from The Marc Haas Foundation, Sue and Edgar Wachenheim III, and the Cheryl and Philip Milstein family.
    Additional support for this program is provided by The JPB Foundation, and the GBH Planet Future Fund.
    CHAPTERS:
    Prologue - 00:00
    Exxon’s Early Research - 1:51
    What the Fossil Fuel Industry Knew - 11:42
    The Politics of Climate Change - 18:37
    Koch & the Lobbyists - 29:29
    Spreading Climate Change Uncertainty - 39:16
    The 1996 IPCC Report & Pushback - 47:48
    The Kyoto Protocol in the U.S. - 1:00:19
    “Code Red for Humanity” - 1:17:22
    Credits - 1:23:00

ความคิดเห็น • 3.1K

  • @iammrbeat
    @iammrbeat 2 ปีที่แล้ว +169

    They're still in the denial, even though it's literally happening. It's like saying the sun is not in the sky when it is.

    • @innawoods2131
      @innawoods2131 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      You always struck me as a PBS kinda guy. Have a great day!

    • @jakebredthauer5100
      @jakebredthauer5100 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      There are many people in denial about the climate change theory. Not so many are in denial about the Sun. It makes more sense to deny climate change than it does to deny the Sun.

    • @innawoods2131
      @innawoods2131 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@jakebredthauer5100 if we didn't have decades worth of research that is easily accessible to anyone with an internet connection, you may have a point. Without access to a world's worth of information at their fingertips, it took a few centuries to reach a consensus on what or where the sun is. With the availability of info now out there, from a variety of credible sources, climate change denial is more akin to willful ignorance.

    • @jakebredthauer5100
      @jakebredthauer5100 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@innawoods2131 It would take too long to look at that. What harm has climate change done so far?

    • @philippealexandra468
      @philippealexandra468 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Well it’s not in the sky, but I know what you mean ;)

  • @mlebaron1
    @mlebaron1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +274

    It’s astounding to hear the lobbyists and PR people say, in so many words, “our job wasn’t to tell the truth, our job was to sow doubts about what was true”. Only one of them sounded as if he’d ever given it any thought.

    • @MrLarryLessor
      @MrLarryLessor 2 ปีที่แล้ว +45

      In my 20 years since college, I've learned that this is what many Americans think their life is devoted to:
      Making money.. and continuing to let the money flow. Even at the expense of truth, or even safety, or public good etc.

    • @burjalmadre
      @burjalmadre 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@MrLarryLessor What will it take to upend this harmful, routine way of thinking in American society?

    • @MrLarryLessor
      @MrLarryLessor 2 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      @@burjalmadre
      That thinking will always be here - be part of our country... but hopefully less and less people will believe in that since it has failed after 20 or 30 years of companies trying it.
      I just had a golf outting yesterday where my retired friend said he worked at Sears for some years and they just were really rigid in their way of thinking and had little room for new ideas - and now they are pretty much going bankrupt after over 100 years of business.
      There are people who just don't understand that "Making a profit" is not even one of the top 4 reasons this country was created:
      Read the Preamble to the Constitution: The first sentence talks about to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense..... It doesn't even mention "promoting he general Welfare" until the 3rd or 4th goal....
      So it's certainly not #1. And "general welfare" does not even necessarily mean private wealth: So making profit FOR YOURSELF was not one of the main reasons for this country - I've had buddies who were very profit-oriented who argued "Yeah but the Pursuit of Happiness implies pursuit of property".
      Still even if you make that interpretation the first 3 or even 4 reasons for creating America was NOT maximizing profit.
      If more people could understand and accept/ realize that, then maybe more people would contribute to wanting a safer, cleaner planet. And ensuring justice for all and "a more perfect union".
      A lot of Americans nowadays have no interest in unity, they are all about amassing wealth and property for themselves, and they think government should just stay out of the way as much as possible and let people be 'free".
      Many of those people have lost sight of why this country was created - it wasn't to allow people to do whatever they want without limits....
      , and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity

    • @brentb5303
      @brentb5303 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      @@burjalmadre Michael Rupert, which is an interesting character for many reasons, did a talk to a few people in a church twenty years ago that really had me asking myself these very questions. His way of putting it was to call it the infinite growth paradigm. Our entire way of thinking is predicated on the idea that growth must continue forever. Which anyone over the age of 6 knows is impossible. We are living in a finite space with limited resources. Even the most brilliant minds at the University of Chicago economics department over look the long term effects of their models. I would argue they can’t see past the next quarter let alone a decade or century down the road. Identifying the problem in thinking isn’t the issue. Deprogramming the masses to not contribute to the problem is insurmountable. Try telling someone they shouldn’t invest money. When you contribute to a 401k you’re contributing to the problem. When you get a credit card, you’re contributing to the problem. So the problem is easily identifiable but you’ll look like a nut case when you give someone the solution.

    • @keirfarnum6811
      @keirfarnum6811 2 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      When openly lying is acceptable in society and is even seen as being part of one’s job and responsibility, it shows that society has truly gone to he||.

  • @d.j.walker3671
    @d.j.walker3671 ปีที่แล้ว +122

    I never cease to be amazed at how open people are about the shameful things they did and said after just a little time has passed.

    • @scottnelsen164
      @scottnelsen164 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      People will do and say anything for money. That and power are why we are in this global warming crisis.

    • @greg-op2jh
      @greg-op2jh ปีที่แล้ว +3

      100©💯

    • @nunyadambusiness3530
      @nunyadambusiness3530 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      that part. they probably got "compensated" for just talking. while we're doing back breaking labor on their behalf. not for our own benefit. @@scottnelsen164

    • @mtn1793
      @mtn1793 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Money worshipping psychopaths. This is the time when Satan inherited the earth.

    • @patriciaschoemaker9348
      @patriciaschoemaker9348 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      'Its just business', Robert Gates, Former Director of Defense, GWB Administration

  • @applesomething
    @applesomething ปีที่แล้ว +67

    This breaks your heart when you’ve been alive since the 70s, heard all about this impending crisis during the 80s, and then to see it really happening now.

    • @mayb8876
      @mayb8876 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Damn

    • @neilsiebenthal9254
      @neilsiebenthal9254 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      But at least a handful of individuals made billions for themselves though right? That's what's really important, keeping the rich, rich...

    • @gussampson5029
      @gussampson5029 ปีที่แล้ว

      It's literally not happening. Didn't you see? They were predicting the doom and gloom would happen in the 70s, then the 80s, then Manhattan would be underwater by the year 2000. Now they say 2030 will be the apocalypse.
      They show a flood and act like that was caused by climate change. Did we not have floods before? Did we not have drought and wildfires? It's ridiculous to think that regular extreme weather events somehow confirm climate change.
      Every prediction they've ever made is wrong. Climate change is an issue and we've got at least 100 more years to deal with it. And we have been dealing with it. More research, more technology, more innovation....
      Even with no significant government action, there are going to be no significant effects to us from climate change. And all the failed predictions show us the foolishness of believing that we're in a state of imminent doom.

    • @neilsiebenthal9254
      @neilsiebenthal9254 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@gussampson5029 that's a lot of mental gymnastics and science denying.. Let me guess.. You think the earth is flat and space doesn't exist either.. Oh and were probably all just in a vr simulation run by aliens also..

    • @y2ktube
      @y2ktube ปีที่แล้ว

      "heard all about this impending crisis - to see it really happening now" - Yeah right Missy, I'm ALL for pollution solutions (clean oceans & clean water etc.) ! - But here's the problem; Liberals throughout the decades have been screaming like 'Chicken Little' about "Existential" threats : IN THE 1960's as a child, the schools taught 'There's a coming Mini-Ice-Age"! - In the 70's they screamed about that AND "We're Overpopulating the Planet" ! - In the 80's and 90's they screamed "Critical Oil" ! - Next came all the blah blah of "Global Warming", which then morphed into "Climate Change" - How can anybody with any commonsense take the BIG GOVERNMENT, TAXation, wealth REDISTRIBUTION Leftists seriously? - Green is the new RED - - - (Communism)
      Just RELAX, the Earth has proven to be SO resilient; i.e. Countless Volcano eruption's, above ground Nuclear tests & Chernobyl (with its Butterflies & daises). In fact, one can visit & take a Chernobyl guided tour group from Kyiv...

  • @topgrain
    @topgrain 2 ปีที่แล้ว +216

    The sad inevitability for humankind is that most of the power is in the hands of the most irresponsible.

    • @madimakes
      @madimakes 2 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      The love of money will make a formerly responsible person irresponsible

    • @sniper887
      @sniper887 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      And least accountable

    • @fedexpress14
      @fedexpress14 2 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      You all cling to this idea that this is a problem of just bad people who don’t care. These are people who are simply doing what is best for themselves and their families economically under a system that puts little to no value on collective society. This is a systemic problem and the system is CAPITALISM.

    • @lilblackduc7312
      @lilblackduc7312 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      After "Traitor Joe" pushes the world into Thermonuclear War...So-called man made C(lie)mate Change will be a moot point.

    • @fedexpress14
      @fedexpress14 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@lilblackduc7312 We’d already be there if the other side was in charge. I’ll take where we are now and stay alive for now.

  • @andrewstoehr
    @andrewstoehr 2 ปีที่แล้ว +43

    Leave it to PBS Frontline to absolutely nail the introduction to the global warming/fossil fuel company problem. Start with Venus, and the timing of the first moment we learned it was an oven.

    • @stephenafonja8193
      @stephenafonja8193 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Oil hadn’t nothing to with this@stephen afonja

    • @pastexpiry2013B
      @pastexpiry2013B 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Venus is a terrible example. It has MAGNITUDES of higher CO2 and Methane levels than Earth.

  • @artmusic2
    @artmusic2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    June 23, 1988 the Congress hearings show the OIL corporate-acracy KNEW CLIMATE DISASTERS were a direct result of their industry. Scientists' data were already apparent in the late 1980's to all the world. Heartbreaking and well-done documentary FRONTLINE.

  • @maxdoubt5219
    @maxdoubt5219 ปีที่แล้ว +33

    I remember the scene in Titanic where a crew member, who knew the ship was sinking, was sent below on some urgent errand. On his way he passed through a party. People drinking and dancing, unaware of the emergency. That's what Big Fossil is saying: don't ruin our party with bad news.

  • @NightDocs
    @NightDocs 2 ปีที่แล้ว +208

    Change can’t start unless you’re being informed and you’re informing others

    • @HateTheIRS
      @HateTheIRS 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Climate change does not cause wildfires that’s false

    • @s.z.6200
      @s.z.6200 2 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      And Big Oil isn’t trying to quash the information.

    • @jakebredthauer5100
      @jakebredthauer5100 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Fortunately, we still have some
      free speech.

    • @lilblackduc7312
      @lilblackduc7312 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@jakebredthauer5100 Yeah, right. 😁 🤣 😁 🤣

    • @RLeezyDeezy
      @RLeezyDeezy 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Information is power....

  • @TheCommunicationCoach
    @TheCommunicationCoach 2 ปีที่แล้ว +488

    One of the best things about Frontline is the narrator, his voice is so smooth and tonally perfect, consistent year after year: William Lyman is an American voice-over artist, actor, and musician. Being known for his polished, resonant voice, Lyman has narrated the PBS series Frontline since its second season in 1984 and played William Tell in the action/adventure television series Crossbow

    • @themela9showwithfulaniyira338
      @themela9showwithfulaniyira338 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Right!🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

    • @HateTheIRS
      @HateTheIRS 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Climate change does not cause wildfires that’s false

    • @TheCommunicationCoach
      @TheCommunicationCoach 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@themela9showwithfulaniyira338 Are you agreeing or just screwing around?

    • @TheCommunicationCoach
      @TheCommunicationCoach 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@HateTheIRS It's a huge factor, no one has said it "caused" wildfires....

    • @HateTheIRS
      @HateTheIRS 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@TheCommunicationCoach it’s not a huge factor at all

  • @SamuelMindel
    @SamuelMindel ปีที่แล้ว +20

    This needs to be part of high-school education across the US. This is part of our history, and our stain on the globe.

    • @urbugnmetoday3183
      @urbugnmetoday3183 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      And you wouldn’t be here without it…

    • @casperchristensen6451
      @casperchristensen6451 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@urbugnmetoday3183 wouldn't be here without what exactly?

    • @urbugnmetoday3183
      @urbugnmetoday3183 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@casperchristensen6451 oil exactly

    • @TractorBeam29
      @TractorBeam29 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@casperchristensen6451 you wouldn't be on the internet without oil. All plastic is made from oil.

    • @StevieAustin-ow3gc
      @StevieAustin-ow3gc 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      If this documentary was introduced into the US curriculum, then Republican led legislatures would immediately pass censorship legislation for its cancellation.

  • @Praisethesunson
    @Praisethesunson 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    If the international criminal court was worth it's title they would have imprisoned every single executive of Exxon as soon as their deliberate crimes for the sake of profit were known.

  • @coyotelong4349
    @coyotelong4349 2 ปีที่แล้ว +252

    This is why I fear humanity is doomed.
    We are an incredibly smart, resilient, and creative species, but our ability to set aside personal interests in the interest of the greater good, to benefit the species collectively, is sadly lacking on the scale we need to make a difference.

    • @mlight6845
      @mlight6845 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      Our nature is to protect our community. If we have been deceived for decades about a slowy arriving danger that is hard to perceive with our 5 senses, we do not act.

    • @jiayangshao4736
      @jiayangshao4736 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@mlight6845 where is the climate danger, where are you when the ice age happened. nice to see a documentary when oil price is in the triple digit and oil companies made money. where is this documentary when oil price was very low for 7 years

    • @HateTheIRS
      @HateTheIRS 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Climate change does not cause wildfires that’s false

    • @thelouster5815
      @thelouster5815 2 ปีที่แล้ว +31

      It’s not so much us, it’s the greedy sociopaths who naturally funnel into power that hold the rest of us back for their own short-sighted, limited self interests.

    • @coyotelong4349
      @coyotelong4349 2 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      @@jiayangshao4736
      The ice age has nothing to do with this… You’re just proving my point

  • @alkh3myst
    @alkh3myst 2 ปีที่แล้ว +88

    "I didn't hear about climate change until I was in graduate school." (in the 2010s,) As for me, I first learned about climate change, still then called the "greenhouse effect" in my science classes in 8th grade, in 1971.We even had a whole-class experiment, where we had a terrarium we put under a heat lamp, and as we gradually pumped more and more CO2 into the tank, the temperature rose higher and higher. This constant shift in the name for the same process is one of the most effective ways Big Oil hid this problem from the world. First, it was the "greenhouse effect" (old school). Then it became the innocuous-sounding "global warming" (Al Gore version). Now, it's "climate change", and people who never noticed this climate catastrophe shell game, the vast majority of people who weren't paying close attention to climate science probably thought each new name was a separate and unique effect. This is how the human race came to "boil the frog", namely ourselves. I wouldn't be surprised at all if ExxonMobil was behind the steady name changes.

    • @hotdog7346
      @hotdog7346 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      All propaganda. You been brainwashed

    • @oliverrojas3185
      @oliverrojas3185 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Thanks for explaining how your science class went about demonstrating the proposed effect of carbon dioxide emissions. In autumn of1985 or 1986 I remember a mother carpooling her son and I to school and listening to a news account on the radio warning of the effects of global warming. At that time, I was not scientifically inclined, but the message did not seem out of line with reality: drive more vehicles, increase emissions, and you have a challenge developing in the atmosphere. Today at 49, I am still over come by an ominous feeling when I drive by a 15 story smoke stack from which whilte smoke is billowing out.

    • @alkh3myst
      @alkh3myst 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@hotdog7346 No, I just paid attention while I was in school. You might want to try that, sometime.

    • @Erin-rg3dw
      @Erin-rg3dw 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Agreed - my parents (in their 60s) talk about that at some point in their lives, the big thing was a new ice age, so they somewhat have wanted to blow off everything else since then because it keeps changing (as you said, terminology). We were recently cleaning out my grandparents' house - longtime readers of Reader's Digest - and lo and behold there's RD editions from the late 80s/early 90s giving tips on how to save the climate and the environment. So none of this is "new" by any means, despite what people want to believe.

    • @lilblackduc7312
      @lilblackduc7312 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      ..After "Traitor Joe" pushes the world into Thermonuclear War, the 'climate' will be a moot point. 😁 🤣 😁 🤣

  • @graywolf2107
    @graywolf2107 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    GREED IS THE NUMBER ONE EXISTENTIAL PROBLEM FOR HUMANITY.

    • @toddmacdowall4924
      @toddmacdowall4924 11 วันที่ผ่านมา

      We need to bring back the horse and buggy!

  • @kevchard5214
    @kevchard5214 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    The sickening part is all the criminals for profit involved in lying to the world will never be held responsible for their criminal actions and the world is suffering now for their actions.

  • @MYRRHfamily
    @MYRRHfamily 2 ปีที่แล้ว +203

    Human beings will collectively get what they deserve. But the problem is that so many don’t deserve what the world is giving them. It’s insane.

    • @monicaperez2843
      @monicaperez2843 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Martin, what you describe is group karma. I worry what kind of world our children and grandchildren will inherit. Sadly, I agree with you 100 percent!

    • @MYRRHfamily
      @MYRRHfamily 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@monicaperez2843 Americans are irresponsible. Our biggest problem is epistemological irresponsibility. We take freedom of speech, and freedom of religion, mush them together and come out with the idea that it’s cool to THINK whatever you want, regardless of the facts. And then we are toast. End rant.

    • @ReverendKeven
      @ReverendKeven 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Let's eat them and absolve ourselves

    • @aeroripper
      @aeroripper 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      We're doomed frankly at this point, better off spending the money on disaster relief and working to secure increasingly scarce water resources. This issue is going to dominate the international politics of the second half of the 21st century and beyond.

    • @mikolowiskamikolowiska4993
      @mikolowiskamikolowiska4993 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @生活有滋有味 do you drive
      Do you use electricity?

  • @swayback7375
    @swayback7375 2 ปีที่แล้ว +55

    Frontline knocked it out of the park here.
    Sadly the impact is ….0
    Things like this should spark real change, it’s remarkable that crimes like this go unpunished, it’s mind blowing to me that all this evidence is essentially worthless.
    The fact that we’re still fighting over
    “Is climate change real” …well that is the craziest thing of all

    • @mindsigh4
      @mindsigh4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      i think the biggest blind spot, (& i believe there was a concerted effort to keep it blind) is human over population.
      in the 1960s people were talking about it (where i am in U.S.) books, movies mentioned it, & then what happened?
      it became sacrilegious to say that there are too many people.
      well, corporations wouldn't want less "consumers" & leaders need tax revenue from growing population, & wars need fresh supply of indoctrnatable youth, etc.& some races/ethnicities/religious types may be encouraged "our people" to breed out of fear they'll be "replaced" but why don't regular folks talk about it? if i know someone is "expecting " a baby, i figure, ok, hope they do their best, & since they've made the decision, im pro baby as far as their family, but inside im still thinking, ok, that's ur dream, but geezus, 7 billion effiing people already, uh, can u not do the math?
      enough fuuuucking people already.

    • @sherriianiro747
      @sherriianiro747 ปีที่แล้ว

      That's what they said about the tobacco industry and look what happened.

    • @philipgates8693
      @philipgates8693 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes, there’s no law against seeking confusion in relation to science. I can’t help but think of the religious idiots in Italy when Galileo said that the earth is not the center of the universe, that the earth rotates around the sun….throw him in jail.

    • @vivigesso3756
      @vivigesso3756 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Radical liberals created a fake narrative.

    • @douglasengle2704
      @douglasengle2704 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The observational evidence is that global warming was reported at 1.1°C in 1991 with a lot of news coverage. In 2022 global warming was reported at 1.06°C with no news coverage. In late 1994 it was announced for unknown reasons global warming has suddenly paused in the early 1990s. It is high school taught science that earth's greenhouse effect is always in saturation from the strong greenhouse gas water vapor and can't be changed. All the greenhouse radiant energy is entirely absorbed by greenhouse gases within 20 meters of the earth's surface. At 1% average tropospheric water vapor over 99% of earth's greenhouse effect is from water vapor.

  • @tocode5434
    @tocode5434 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    I think this is what professionalism looks like in journalism and narrating. And the narrator's voice is so smooth that it makes you keep listening.

  • @RankinMsP
    @RankinMsP 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Depressing from beginning to end.
    This should be compulsory viewing for all.

    • @michaelcap9550
      @michaelcap9550 11 วันที่ผ่านมา

      PBS = Left wing pablum.

  • @larryjones5655
    @larryjones5655 2 ปีที่แล้ว +68

    I'm convinced "big business" decides this country's politics. Furthermore, nearly all who seek/hold political office are "owned" by "big business", and therefore, (sadly) almost always act in the interest of their "masters", not what's best for this country.

    • @jackgardner8225
      @jackgardner8225 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      I've been convinced of the same for decades because I have witnessed it. We have the best government money can buy.

    • @virgilpalmer2427
      @virgilpalmer2427 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Larry.. you couldn't be more right...

    • @sassagrass7095
      @sassagrass7095 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      We live in a corporate oligarchy

    • @jakebredthauer5100
      @jakebredthauer5100 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@sassagrass7095
      Sounds like fascism.

    • @juliehenderson1672
      @juliehenderson1672 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Corporations write legislation. Legislators, congress, doesn't read it. They cherry pick what will benefit them. Corporations run the country and Congress works for them in exchange for getting/retaining their position.

  • @nelsonbarrios1718
    @nelsonbarrios1718 2 ปีที่แล้ว +37

    I have a strong feeling that I waisted my time today watching and confirming what I already knew, that corporate interests and lobbying rule the entire world

  • @kaiserY
    @kaiserY หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you. The most suffering thing I can imagine now is watching an environmental scientist talking about a chapter on climate change written by him for 20 mins.

  • @edbarr1379
    @edbarr1379 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Shows how greed can make you disregard the destruction of the world, just because its your job, or you want to get rich.

  • @justinblackwood4241
    @justinblackwood4241 2 ปีที่แล้ว +99

    Frontline is doing the best investigative journalism in the United States right now. Keep it up!!! Climate change is the most pressing issue that humanity faces right now, we need to take immediate action or face the consequences.

    • @juicyparsons
      @juicyparsons 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      right?! I expect this content from left-leaning youtube independents but seeing this get to PBS is awesome

    • @alkh3myst
      @alkh3myst 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      We're facing the consequences right now.

    • @topgrain
      @topgrain 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@juicyparsonsPBS deals in facts, and truth. And that is quite "left leaning." If you are right leaning, and believe PBS to be your buddy, you are extraordinarily delusional.

    • @heynow01
      @heynow01 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@juicyparsons if you want to see a great example of just how good Frontline is, watch the Frontline part one on the Russian interference of the 2016 election.
      Almost every single person they interviewed in now under investigation by John Durham.
      The cast of conspirators that were colluding to frame DJT is so huge, Durham can only focus on about 20 main characters.
      Frontline used all these liars to tell a completely false story.
      It makes you wonder why people would risk their reputation and careers to blatantly lie about what they knew.
      The funniest part of these Frontline productions is listening to the narrator's booming voice speak with such authority as he lies about everything he says.
      But here we are again and the same story of lying and twisting facts to create another false narrative.
      They always fail to mention the changes they are proposing is going to make China the most powerful and richest country in the world. China is laughing their asses off the we are crippling our economy and our security and paying them to build all the unreliable solar and wind turbines.
      China is building one new coal fired electrical plant every Month and drilling for oil as fast as they can.
      It's like we just handed them the keys to our country and asked them to please take good care of us innocent fools.
      I wonder why they aren't building hardly any solar or wind farms?

    • @heynow01
      @heynow01 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Gee, I wonder if the timing of this fictional climate propaganda is related to poopy pants shuddering our greatest natural resource.
      This Frontline garbage is the worst kind of one sided propaganda. I'm glad they had the courage to sneak in Al Gore, the biggest climate huckster of them all. The very same guy that made himself a multimillionaire by accepting free ownership in a fake carbon off set company. It allows big carbon output from companies and says you can buy credits to sponsor carbon reduction, to off set your carbon output. People actually bought that hook line and sinker, just like they keep buying the hucksters predictions of climate catastrophe even when they fail every time.

  • @Mk-il3zq
    @Mk-il3zq 2 ปีที่แล้ว +29

    1:19- " it cost the country and it cost the world".....how are these liars not seen as criminals? Where is the justice???

    • @goldencyclone4984
      @goldencyclone4984 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      The answer is money.

    • @crisismanagement
      @crisismanagement 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Justice will come.

    • @KirsySlane
      @KirsySlane หลายเดือนก่อน

      Maria Rosa's Daughter Way...Again...Thanks NYPD...Sag Harbor's

  • @JonnoPlays
    @JonnoPlays ปีที่แล้ว +4

    What about the hole we punched in the Ozone layer with CFCs? I'm only about a quarter of the way through so I'm hoping this is mentioned at some point.

  • @joekaplowitz2719
    @joekaplowitz2719 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    What we received from Kyoto was the lesson that no one can win in a challenge against Big Oil. This remains true 31 years later.

  • @pt_atx
    @pt_atx 2 ปีที่แล้ว +85

    Narrator could talk about watching paint dry and I would listen. He's awesome.

    • @rg9810
      @rg9810 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      TONIGHT ON FRONTLINE.....PAINT CHIPS....
      DID YOUUUUU SWALLOW??

    • @Mr.T-BAGGIN-UR-MOM
      @Mr.T-BAGGIN-UR-MOM 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Lol, that's kinda g.-.y.

    • @T61APL89
      @T61APL89 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      He's like Bill Kurtis from American Justice, its so good!

    • @FoundLamb
      @FoundLamb 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Completely agree 🙌🏻

    • @cantweallgetalong
      @cantweallgetalong 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yeah, listen to him on the Russian collusion documentaries. Very impressive liar.

  • @Vaninasanta
    @Vaninasanta ปีที่แล้ว +63

    DON´T LOOK UP!
    As an ecologist from my ten years, I deeply THANK YOU for such an overwhelming ethical, clear and profound documentary. Yes: LOOK UP!!! Please!!!

    • @janetmarmaro8269
      @janetmarmaro8269 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ✔️🌸

    • @y2ktube
      @y2ktube ปีที่แล้ว

      "DON´T LOOK UP!" - Yes, yes, THE SKY IS FALLING ! - Said Chicken Little... - Google it :
      Even with the peril of losing their jobs/grants in Academia, there are HUNDREDS of brave scientists who openly counter this MAN-MADE climate change garbage...
      Again, I'm ALL for pollution solutions (clean oceans & clean water etc.) ! - But here's the problem; Liberals throughout the decades have been screaming like 'Chicken Little' about "Existential" threats : IN THE 1960's as a child, the schools taught 'There's a coming Mini-Ice-Age"! - In the 70's they screamed about that AND "We're Overpopulating the Planet" ! - In the 80's and 90's they screamed "Critical Oil" ! - Next came all the blah blah of "Global Warming", which then morphed into "Climate Change" - How can anybody with any commonsense take the BIG GOVERNMENT, Carbon TAXation, wealth REDISTRIBUTION Leftists seriously?
      - Green is truly the new RED - - - (Communism) -
      Just RELAX, the Earth has proven to be SO resilient; i.e. Countless Volcano eruption's, above ground Nuclear tests & Chernobyl (with its Butterflies & daises). In fact, one can visit & take a Chernobyl guided tour group from Kyiv...

    • @Vaninasanta
      @Vaninasanta ปีที่แล้ว

      @@y2ktube Yes, I see your point. But all of the issues that you comment are proven factual and true in time, scientists do see things in advance because... well, that´s what they do! They *study* things and are able to project them in the future.
      There´s no question about the earth, I completely agree with you, it *will* survive, no doubt about it. But *WE* won´t. And that´s the issue here.
      Also... commies?? On the XXI Century??? We´re on 2022, dear, no 1922... I mean, c´mon! It´s old stuff, they don´t exist anymore, like the dinosaurs 🙄

    • @y2ktube
      @y2ktube ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Vaninasanta - "scientists do see things in advance" - Yes of course, especially if your College Grant is something you wish to keep (there are many instances cited that show if you don't agree with the Leftish 'Agenda', they pull you out of the Academia MONEY loop.
      "commies?? In the XXI Century??? We´re in 2022, dear, not 1922... I mean, c´mon! It´s old stuff" - Wow you're totally blinded. - Maybe now that Twitter will stop censoring conservatives, you'll begin to see that you've been fooled. That's why the saying exists : “Those that fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it.” Winston Churchill

    • @Vaninasanta
      @Vaninasanta ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@y2ktube Well, at least from my side, I really *really* want us humans to move forward, not backwards... one can dream...

  • @paulcarlton598
    @paulcarlton598 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    These are great, thank you for uploading these Frontlines.

  • @ScottPalangi
    @ScottPalangi หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Frontline is always the best

  • @rbagany
    @rbagany 2 ปีที่แล้ว +95

    "The planet isn't going anywhere. WE ARE!" (George Carlin)

    • @donsudia2674
      @donsudia2674 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      I love George Carlin. He's either smiling down on us. Or screaming up at us.

    • @Tiger1x1
      @Tiger1x1 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      George Carlin a legend miss him

    • @raymondbisbing2238p
      @raymondbisbing2238p ปีที่แล้ว

      Ok

    • @truthismycause2800
      @truthismycause2800 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Prophet Carlin

    • @galejohnson6953
      @galejohnson6953 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Recently binged watched some of George Carlin‘s shows. Amazing and sad How much of what he had to say is still true today!

  • @FloridaRaider
    @FloridaRaider 2 ปีที่แล้ว +39

    For investigative reporting, Frontline is the gold standard.

    • @zokitchvlog
      @zokitchvlog ปีที่แล้ว +3

      informative

    • @nikkiwroten2296
      @nikkiwroten2296 ปีที่แล้ว

      PBS along with NPR is a liberal news media propaganda outlet !

  • @saralynfosnight5139
    @saralynfosnight5139 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    I remember the first time I heard of global warming-1983, I was at an artists' colony in Western Massachusetts. It was November and the temperature was 65 one day. Very warm for November. Just last week, in Chicago, the temperature was 79 degrees, again in November. Things are worse, not better. These corporations are killing us all.

  • @mathematicus3141
    @mathematicus3141 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Wow, that is a comprehensive view. Thank you Frontline!

  • @savagecub
    @savagecub 2 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    It really should be titled “The power of big MONEY” because that’s really what’s at play here. Until we do away with lobbyists and establish term limits this will always be with us.

    • @trinalittlefield6294
      @trinalittlefield6294 ปีที่แล้ว

      "The real owners are the big wealthy business interests that control things and make all the important decisions. Forget the politicians, they're an irrelevancy. The politicians are put there to give you the idea that you have freedom of choice. You don't. You have no choice. You have owners. They own you. They own everything. They own all the important land. They own and control the corporations. They've long since bought and paid for the Senate, the Congress, the statehouses, the city halls. They've got the judges in their back pockets. And they own all the big media companies, so that they control just about all of the news and information you hear. They've got you by the balls. They spend billions of dollars every year lobbying ­ lobbying to get what they want. Well, we know what they want; they want more for themselves and less for everybody else."
      - George Carlin
      Complete agree. Our government really needs an overhaul. Especially the crooked crazy GOP holy shit! But the corporate dems aren't much better as far as big business interests are concerned.

    • @chuckevilsizer2383
      @chuckevilsizer2383 ปีที่แล้ว

      There's no way you can eliminate lobbyists.....free speech. And term limits require a constitutional amendment.

    • @trinalittlefield6294
      @trinalittlefield6294 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@chuckevilsizer2383 what does money have to do with speech. It's one thing to talk to a member of congress about your needs. It's another to pay that member of congress to meet your needs.
      We are not on level playing field anymore. Why are corporate America's needs more important than mine? Did ExxonMobil cast a vote? The idea that corporations are somehow "people" who somehow deserve the same freedoms is ridiculous. It's legalized bribery and a Supreme Court decision that either needs to be overturned or legislated out if we ever want to go back to politicians who work for the people.

    • @fromashestoangels378
      @fromashestoangels378 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@trinalittlefield6294 well said.

    • @chuckevilsizer2383
      @chuckevilsizer2383 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@trinalittlefield6294 there are supreme court decisions i dont like too. But our laws are passed by congress and the states, and the court interprets the constitution whether you like it or not

  • @dafinaglgrrrr8565
    @dafinaglgrrrr8565 2 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    My family criticized me in the 1980s as I was adamant about recycling, energy conservation and alternative solutions to an outdated grid which use’s more energy to supply the grid than it provides. Yet I have not given up and now with many grandchildren becoming aware I believe they will do what our predecessors failed to.

    • @douglasengle2704
      @douglasengle2704 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Don't use global warming as an example it has been paused at about 1°C since the early 1990s and it is high school taught science earth's greenhouse effect is always in saturation from the strong greenhouse gas water vapor and can't be changed.

  • @GibsonReview
    @GibsonReview 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    The only solution I see is going after these CEOs and their families. The Kock has two children. They threaten ours we go to theirs. This has now become an existential threat on our chidren's future.

  • @Gantana844
    @Gantana844 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Love FL. No ads, no BS. Just good stuff. Keep up the good work y'all

  • @cwidd1929
    @cwidd1929 2 ปีที่แล้ว +95

    This is the real shit right here - this is why you subscribe to PBS. A few of Frontline's recent documentaries have been quite tepid (e.g. Pandora Papers, Power of the Fed, etc.), but this kind of deep, multi-part, multi-hour long, expansive investigation that hits at all the major players, the personalities, the connective tissues behind the financial decisions, the legislation, the consequences - this is why Frontline is a leader in investigative documentary programming.

    • @wolfejar
      @wolfejar 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      I’m a PBS donor. $20/mo. Frontline and all the PBS kids shows is why I continue to support PBS. Our American society is coming unraveled because we don’t have good Journalism. Our founding fathers knew this. Free and open press. We lost our journalism starting in the late 90’s and early 00’s with the internet. No one wanted to pay for the “news” in return pay journalist salaries.

    • @marileesteele1804
      @marileesteele1804 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@wolfejar Investigative reporting is expensive, long , human labor intensive ,demands focus due to complexity hence not entertaining hence not highly profitable or popular. The "press" doesn't exist, coverage is national not local national and editor are controlled by moguls, conglomerates & hedge funds. Profitability is mostly from ad revenue. I am grateful you donate because I couldn't possibly process with ad interruptions every 5 minutes. Long live PBS!!!!

    • @JW-pb8fg
      @JW-pb8fg 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      HA HA HA! YOU OBVIOUSLY DON'T KNOW "REAL SHIT" FROM YOUR OWN SHIT!

    • @VelleyIndustrial
      @VelleyIndustrial 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      We're all PBS donors, unless you don't pay taxes.

    • @davehansen9124
      @davehansen9124 ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@marileesteele1804

  • @jenniferedmonds7069
    @jenniferedmonds7069 2 ปีที่แล้ว +35

    Notice Dr. Hansen speaking from his "earthship" with passive solar heating design. Awesome.

  • @clementsun
    @clementsun ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I am completely livid.
    This should have 1 billion views. And there should have been unceasing outrage because of it.
    The people named in this series, who created and abetted this deception, need to be held to account. And thank God for these journalists for exposing them.
    What they have done amounts to a crime against all of humanity.
    There should be, at the very least, class action civil lawsuits against all of them to relieve them of whatever wealth they have ill-gotten.
    People who have been on the wrong side of history need to be prosecuted for the damage they have wrought to serve as a lesson for others yet to come.
    They are the embodiment of evil. Pure evil.

  • @richardklyver8767
    @richardklyver8767 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Incredible, thank you for what you do to educate the public and provide truth.

  • @john_dee1431
    @john_dee1431 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Raymond of the 80's - single man's voice deciding the fate without choice of millions. This cannot ever happen again.

  • @chriskriskovic5914
    @chriskriskovic5914 2 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    Wow! Exxon had a huge head start in the alternative energy sector and Lee Raymond pissed it away with his very poor judgment. Shareholders should have been irate! The level of executive misconduct on his part was enormous. Not just in suppressing scientific fact and lying to anyone willing to listen but in dooming Exxon’s future as an energy company. Pretty dumb on his part.

  • @davidav3980
    @davidav3980 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I wonder why I dont watch these documentaries regularly and I make them to be my MUST watch documentaries on the weekends. Seriously thank you !!!!!

  • @youdonthavetoreadthispost.5850
    @youdonthavetoreadthispost.5850 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I worked in the oil industry - none of this is a surprise to me - exhaust gas analysis was part of my job. I can do the math !

  • @Monkeybongoes
    @Monkeybongoes 2 ปีที่แล้ว +55

    Cutting back on fossil fuels may or may not lead to job loss as other industries open up.
    What undeniably leads to job loss is shipping them overseas, as many CEOs did in the 80s, 90s and 2000s.

    • @mikolowiskamikolowiska4993
      @mikolowiskamikolowiska4993 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Cheaper always wins in economics

    • @peteosmussen9423
      @peteosmussen9423 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@mikolowiskamikolowiska4993 in the short term. The long term effects of pollution are coming home to roost.

    • @mikolowiskamikolowiska4993
      @mikolowiskamikolowiska4993 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@peteosmussen9423 as it should. survival Of The fittest .can't save everyone

    • @peteosmussen9423
      @peteosmussen9423 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@mikolowiskamikolowiska4993 The biggest polluters are probably NOT the fittest.

    • @mikolowiskamikolowiska4993
      @mikolowiskamikolowiska4993 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@peteosmussen9423 doesn't matter. Let nature decide. Or go ahead and thanos ppl if you're 'fit' enough to. Fittest will be left standing one way or the other

  • @Eks_Sinoveta
    @Eks_Sinoveta 2 ปีที่แล้ว +319

    Frontline never disappoint, Number 1 channel for curated documentaries 🔥🔥

    • @craigjoyner9857
      @craigjoyner9857 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Hands down. Several tremendous documentaries.

    • @MinusEighty
      @MinusEighty 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      I am so disappointed in this documentary. Pure propaganda. Total nonsense.

    • @craigjoyner9857
      @craigjoyner9857 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      @@MinusEighty , please explain what is propaganda in the documentary. Genuine questions.

    • @MinusEighty
      @MinusEighty 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @@craigjoyner9857 Sorry I don't have the time. In short nothing has happened, and nothing will happen. It has been forty years and none of the predictions of doom have happened.

    • @lilblackduc7312
      @lilblackduc7312 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      In 1988 Eco-Terrorists claimed = "All of Manhattan & half of Florida will be underwater by 1993...no wait, 2000 (Y2K), no wait 2012, I meant to say 2022. 😁 🤣 😁 🤣

  • @ddg4860
    @ddg4860 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank God PBS. Isn't the only place to get information !!!!

  • @carley4063
    @carley4063 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    In what universe can we put a stop to these monsters? They would see the entire planet burn to satisfy their greed.

  • @wreaverfizzlefen3234
    @wreaverfizzlefen3234 2 ปีที่แล้ว +187

    Even by FRONTLINE's lofty standards, this is outstanding, and very much looking forward to the next episode.

    • @MinusEighty
      @MinusEighty 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      I could not disagree more.

    • @xchopp
      @xchopp 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@MinusEighty Because...?

    • @MinusEighty
      @MinusEighty 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@xchopp There is no global warming crisis. Frontline is doubling down on nonsense from forty years ago that time has proven to be false. How long can we keep pretending? The predictions were wrong.

    • @putler965
      @putler965 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      No it isn't. If they were going to feature Al Gore, they should have mentioned his $30K annual utility bill.

    • @ryangibson2831
      @ryangibson2831 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      FRONTLINE does not have lofty standards. At least I don't think so. I find them very credible.

  • @Daveomabegin
    @Daveomabegin 2 ปีที่แล้ว +100

    I'm glad that this documentary was made, but omg it is depressing. I feel like we're headed towards a precipice, and the most powerful people in our society are trying to convince the busy ignorant plebians that there is no precipice. 🤦🏼‍♂️

    • @screaminpman
      @screaminpman 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      It is sad. The dishonest climate change deniers should be in jail, but of course, wealthy people never face consequences in America.

    • @rg9810
      @rg9810 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      We've been at that point...

    • @DirtFlyer
      @DirtFlyer 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Just be optimistic and Don't Look Up!

    • @LynxStarAuto
      @LynxStarAuto 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@DirtFlyer you mean don't look down.

    • @tselot909
      @tselot909 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@LynxStarAuto
      .
      .

  • @1550arenteria
    @1550arenteria ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I use to be a mortgage lone officer. I never heard of a loan officer asking for extra money after the closing. I'm glad the bank won the case.

  • @NotFluplaxio
    @NotFluplaxio 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    It will never cease to amaze me how much bs you can get away with when you have enough money and a public lazy enough to just buy whatever message you feed them. I know the internet changed our access and understanding, but these companies just lied boldly at every turn. The best we get is a weak excuse 30 years later.

  • @catvids8786
    @catvids8786 2 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    Felt so broken now, wtf I can't sleep thinking if I turned a blind eye to this through these years, or did I make myself believe that this industry doesn't cause too much because of those "unproven theory" that is somehow discussed in schools too. I feel sorry for the third world countries like ours, it's summer and we have three consecutive typhoons already. Philippines is used to it every year, but I felt like it gets worse. When I had watch a Q and A in a Miss Earth pageant few years ago, I raised my brows when a candidate said that she wanted to terminate operations of oil industries so bad, primarily because of burning of fossil fuels. I was like "omg you're brave but you're insane. That's close to impossible."
    But now I just wanted to cry😭 I've fantasized this field so much.

    • @jameswilliamson3210
      @jameswilliamson3210 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Thank you for learning. Later is always better than never. There are a lot of things that are unavoidable now, but it is no time to give up. We can still make sure things won't be as bad as the could be

    • @catvids8786
      @catvids8786 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@jameswilliamson3210 thank you so much sir for your kind words. More power to you

    • @jimmyf9545
      @jimmyf9545 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      At least you have come around to see your errors. You were hoodwinked.

  • @zEropoint68
    @zEropoint68 2 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    nothing is going to change until these companies are held financially liable for the damage resulting from their malfeasance. reporters keep quoting these giant dollar amounts for damages, but it means nothing to the people actually responsible for them. instead, it's the victims who will pay that price, most of which will probably just end up going right back to the people who did the harm in the first place. the more damage they do, the more money they make.
    it's sick to the point of just giving up, acknowledging there's no way out, and accepting the consequences of our actions.

    • @zz449944
      @zz449944 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Why is most of the blame placed on the energy companies? They are doing a job -- providing exactly what society and individual consumers demand, consume, and willingly pay for every single day of their lives. That all of these energy companies are so successful at running their businesses is because consumers don't cut back on energy usage and instead use more and more every day. Personal energy consumption keeps rising, so the smart energy companies keep providing it -- it is just good business.
      In the end, the blame for increased energy usage goes to consumers and individuals who use more and more petrol and more electricity instead of using less. Until individual people learn to stay at home and unplug some shit, nothing will change.

    • @trinalittlefield6294
      @trinalittlefield6294 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@zz449944 because they lied?? And then started a huge ass disinformation campaign which prevented any meaningful policy changes or reforms in the last 40 years?? Did u not watch the show?? Yes, they're a business. But they had an ethical obligation not to fucking lie just so they could line their pockets extra fat. I mean seriously, they're not rich enough?? Their future generations won't even be able to spend all their billions... plus they'll be too busy trying not to burn up.

    • @trinalittlefield6294
      @trinalittlefield6294 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@zz449944 and to be fair, I get what you're saying. Personal responsibility IS important. Unfortunately half the damn country doesn't even believe we have a problem yet (I'm not sure globally how people feel) thanks to the lies they've been fed. Look at the past administration's response. A big ole disinformation campaign. It's frustrating.

  • @pinkpeonyy
    @pinkpeonyy ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you for posting this video and showing the truth

  • @iagiag5312
    @iagiag5312 23 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I wish The New York times or CNN could be at this level of journalism

  • @DennisMoore664
    @DennisMoore664 2 ปีที่แล้ว +32

    15:51 - there are few things I hate more than someone taking a piss on me and trying to tell me it's raining.
    (this whole program makes me deeply angry. I've known this was coming coming since I was in grade school. Don't know where they were but I was being warned about environmental catastrophe over and over back in the 70's and 80's. Most anyone who says they didn't know using polluting products like fossil fuels was going to be a problem didn't want to know because they had an immediate profit motive at stake. And now their grandkids and the rest of the world are all pissed off at them and they want to minimize their part - freaking people.)

    • @jkholtgreve
      @jkholtgreve 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Carl Sagan talked about it on the original Cosmos in 1980 for Heaven’s sake. Not a secret at all.

    • @robertpowell4845
      @robertpowell4845 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      park your car, never drive it. don't heat your house, stop use of all energy.
      As a person following the science for 40 years we are dead. The climate change 15 years ago. we are ghosts. I strongly believed in "global warming" 40 years ago. that is the reason we know we are ghosts.

    • @41357500
      @41357500 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      ok.........do you set your heat at 68 degrees? do you have the audacity to have air conditioning? if so do you set ur ac at 80 degrees? nope.....no one really cares,,,,,,,so stfu

    • @jenwendy7
      @jenwendy7 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      omg I couldn't contain myself through this whole f***in' show. I'm so pissed I'm here in the comment section looking for solidarity.

    • @DennisMoore664
      @DennisMoore664 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@jenwendy7 Hosed people of the world unite!

  • @ignaziolaudando6497
    @ignaziolaudando6497 2 ปีที่แล้ว +108

    Same can be said for our healthcare system for big tobacco companies in one way or another they’re killing us for somebody’s profit

    • @NicholasLittlejohn
      @NicholasLittlejohn 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      "Thank you for Smoking" 🚬

    • @redwhiteblue9866
      @redwhiteblue9866 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Sadly you can add the American food supply to the list of corporate profit over peoples health. Don't be deceived by thinking "they wouldn't do that". They sure as hell would and do.

    • @mlight6845
      @mlight6845 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      The ~40 people supporting the tobacco industry moved to support the oil industry.(Merchants of Doubt, 2011).

    • @redwhiteblue9866
      @redwhiteblue9866 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@jiayangshao4736 In order for me to be a hypocrite I would have had to have made a comment about the oil industry which I did not do read it again. But I'll make a comment now, if we could just get honest information we could make an informed choice about the best way for us to move forward in terms of our energy needs.

    • @HateTheIRS
      @HateTheIRS 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Climate change does not cause wildfires that’s false

  • @ToddSloanIAAN
    @ToddSloanIAAN ปีที่แล้ว

    Front line did a good job putting light under some pretty heavy rocks for us to see clearer.

  • @cherylgibson7038
    @cherylgibson7038 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    “Thumbs up” for content; “thumbs down” for corporate corruption.

  • @tfreej920
    @tfreej920 2 ปีที่แล้ว +92

    I believe I have watched every episode of Frontline since I was a kid. I think this 3-part series is one of its all-time best. THANK YOU, Frontline!!

    • @frederickruderman2997
      @frederickruderman2997 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Probably why he is the narrator 😂. Of course, I agree with you

    • @irafeiger
      @irafeiger ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@frederickruderman2997
      .
      .........
      ........
      ...
      ..........
      ......................
      .............................
      ....
      ....
      .........................
      .,..,.................................................................................................................,,........................................................,.................................................... L. L,,,,,,..,..........,................................................................................................................................................................................,?,,?. 00000000000000000b0b0b0b0b0b0b0b0b0b0b0b0b0b0b0b0b00b0b0b0b0b0b0b0b0b0b0b0b0b0b0b0b0b0b0b0b0b0b0b0b0b0b0b0b0b0b0bp0bp0b0b0b0b0b0b0b0b0b0b0b0b0b0b0b0bp0b0b0b0b0b0b0bp0bppppp0bp0bp0b}0b}0b}0bpnoono0b}0b}on}no0bpono0bppplnn0b}0b}0b}0b}0bp0b0b0b0b0b0b0b0b0bp0b0b0b0b0b0bp0bp0bp0bpppp0bp0bp}0b}0b}0bpp}0b}0b}0bp}0b}0bp}0b}0b}0b}0b}0b}0b}0b0b0bp0bppp0b0b0bo0b0b0bp0bp0b}0bp0bp0bppp0b}0b0bpp0b}0bpp}0b}0b}onop0b}0b}0b}0b}n0b}0b}n0b}n0boppnnn0b}0bpnnnn0b}n0bp}np0b}0b}0bpnnnnnkp0b}n0bpnnnnnnn0b}0bp}n0b}0b}0b}0bp}0bppp0b}0bp}0bpp}0bppp}0bppp0bpp}0bppp0bp}0bp}0bpp}0bppp}0b}0b}n0bp}0b}0b}0bo}0bpnn0b}n0bp}0bpp}0bo}n0bp}0b}n0b}n0b}n0boppp! 0b}0bop!0b}n0bopn0b}0bop}0boppn0bp}0bop}n0bop}0boppp}0bop}n0bopn0bopn0bop! 0bo}0bop}0bop}0bopp}0bop}0bopppn0bo}0bopp}nnn0bopppn0bop}nn0bop}0boppnn0bopp}0bop}nn0bopp}n0boppp}0bopp}0boppp!0bopn0bo}0bop}0bpnn}}nppn0b0bopn0npnpn0b0bpn0bo0bpn0n0obppppp0boppp0bo}0bopppn0bop}n0bp}n0boppp! 0bo}nn0bopp! Pn}npnppnn0bo}n0bopn0bopn0bop! 0bo}0bo}0bo}0bo}0bo}0bop0bop0bop0bop0boppp0bop0bo}0bo}0bo}0boppn0boppn0bo}0bo}n0boppn0bopp! 0boppnnn0bopnn0bop}0bo}0bo}0bo}0bo}0bo}0bpn0bo}0bo}n0bp}0bo}n0boppn0bo}0bop}n0bopn0bopn0bop}0bopn0bo}n0bp}n0bop! 0bo}n0bop! 0boppn0bopn0bop!o! 0bopp}0bo}0bopn0bo}0bop}n0bp}n0bp}n0bopn0bopn0bop! 0bo}0bopn0bopnnn0b}0bo}0bo}0bo}npnppnn0bo}n0bopn0bopn0bop! 0bopn0bop!0bop!0bop!0bopn!0bo}0bopn0bopn0bop!0bopnn0bop!0bop!0bopp!0bop!0bopnn0bo}n0bop! 0bopn0bop!0bopn0bo}n0bopn0bopn0bop! 0bopn0bopn0bop!0bop!0bop!0bop!0bop!0bop!0bop!0bop!0bop!0bop!0bop!0bopn0bop!0bopn0bopn0bop!0bop!0bopn0bop!0bopn0bop!0bop!0bop!0bop!0bop!0bop!0bop!0bop!0bop!0bop!0bop!0bop!nnn0bop! 0bopn0bop!0bop!0bop!0bop!0bop!0bop!0bop!0bp!0bop!0bop!0bp!0bop!0bop!0bop!0bop!0bopn0bop!0bop!0bop!0bop!0bpn0bop!0bop!0bop!0bopnnnp0bop!0bopn0bop!0bop!0bop!0bop!n0bop! 0bop!0bop!0bop!0bop!0bop!0bop!0bop!0bop!0obp!0bop!0bp!0bop!0bop!0bop!0bop!0bop!0bop!0bop!0bop!0bop!0bop!n0bopn0bopn0bop! 0bop!0bop!0bop!0bop!0bop!0bop!n0bop! 0bop!0bo}n0bop! 0bop!0bop!0bop!p0bop! 0bop!0bop!0bop!0bopp!0bop!0obp!0bop!n}}0bopoo0bo}0bpp0bp0bop0bop0bop0bo}0bopnn0bopn0bopnn0bop!0bopn0bopn0bop!0bop!0bop!n0bop! Pbp! 0bop!0bop!0bop!0bop!0bop!0bop!0bop!0bop!n0bop! Pbp}pbp}0b}npb}0b}on}0bopn0bopnnpbpnpbpnpbpnpbpn0bpn0npn!pbp! Pbp! Pbp! Pbp! Pbp pbp! P! N0bop! 0bop!pbp! Pbp! Pbp! 0bop!pbp! Pbp! Pbp! Pbp! Pbp! Pbp! Pbp! 0bop!pbp! Pbp! Pbp! 0bp!pbp! Pbp! 0bop!pbp! Pbp! Pbp! Pbp! Pbp! Pbp! Pbp! Pbp! Pbp! Pbp! Pbp! Pbp! 0bop!0bop!pbp! 0bop!pbp! Pbp! Pbp! Pbp! Pbp! Pbp! Pbp! Pbp! Pn)on)on)pnlnpbppb}on}on}pbpnnnnnpbonpb}0obp!0obp!0bop!pbp! P! Pbp! Pbp! Pbp! Pbp! Pbp! Pbp! 0obp!pbp! Pbp! Pbp! Pbp! Pbp! Pbp! Pbp! Pbp! Pbp! Pbp! Pbp! Pbp! Pbp! Pbp! Pbp! 0bp!pbp! Pbp! Pbp! Pbp! Pbp! Pbp! Pbp! Pbp! Pbp! Pbp! Pbp! Pbp! Pbp! 0bop!pbp! N0bp!}on)npnppnn0bo! Pbp! Pbp! Pbpnpbppnnnnpbo! Pbpnpbp! Pbp! Pbp! Pbp! 0bop!pbp! Pbp! Pbp! Pbp! Pbp! Pbp! Pbp! Pbp! Pbp! Pbp! Pbp! Pbp! Pbpnpb}obop! 00000⁰oo00000o00⁰00p0000⁰p00o0⁰00000000o⁰000o00000000000bobl⁰00o000⁰000000000⁰0po000000⁰o0000000⁰000p000⁰00p⁰o00}0o0⁰00p0⁰0000000000o0000⁰00000⁰000⁰00poo00bo

    • @jaredkinneyjr
      @jaredkinneyjr ปีที่แล้ว

      Meanwhile China / Mexico & every other non-Western country pollutes 100x more than US but us Americans cant farm or drive cars??? Sure, makes sense

    • @kiwitrainguy
      @kiwitrainguy 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Well, that made a lot of sense!@@irafeiger

  • @fourdegreeswarmer
    @fourdegreeswarmer 2 ปีที่แล้ว +31

    The best part of the killing BTU Tax segment was corporation’s saying the quiet part out loud: if we have to pay it, we’ll pass it onto the consumer in order to preserve our profits.
    The fact that all these people questioned the tax and not the corporation that was willing to put their boot on the neck of the working class to preserve the margin, tells you everything you need to know.

    • @daniel213141
      @daniel213141 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      I was thinking the same thing and the fact the Koch brothers have opposed every meaningful social initiative from Universal health care to public transit expansion speaks volumes about their real motives.

    • @simplethings3730
      @simplethings3730 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      There are ways to keep them from passing the BTU on to consumers. Such as consumer reimbursement. It just requires legislation that would never be proposed or passed.

    • @devalapar7878
      @devalapar7878 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Did you calculate it? I am not sure if they would still make a profit.
      For me it was always clear that we have to change everything and that everyone has to pay more for things.
      Transportation is the biggest source of CO2. So cities have to change. People have to stop living in one family homes. We need walkable cities and good public transport. But you can't have that if everyone lives in a one family home as in the US. If we stopped driving cars, we would already reduce 10-20% of the CO2.
      We don't only need a CO2 tax. We also need a waste tax, so that companies focus on recycling and make their products repairable.

    • @heynow01
      @heynow01 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@devalapar7878 You are right on target. The more you tax and inflate the cost of living, the easier it will be to get people to comply with the one world agenda. Even if the climate goals are never achieved, it was a good motivator to get people to accept a lower standard of living to allow for the elite to live like royalty.

    • @devalapar7878
      @devalapar7878 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@heynow01 I have no idea what this has to do with one world government. First, there is nothing like that in the world. Second, it has nothing to do with waste and CO2 level.
      I would say living in a walkable city raises your standard of living.
      Today, the cost of waste is paid by taxpayers. And in the future it would be part of the price of a product.
      This would give companies an incentive to develop better products. Ones that don't create as much waste.
      So we would pay more for products but we would pay less for taxes.
      It is the right thing to do, no matter in which system you live.
      And it is not new! We have similar regulations everywhere.

  • @EB-ri6bb
    @EB-ri6bb 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    "It was my job to do that" echoes "I was only following orders"

  • @kevinrisneraprilrisner4595
    @kevinrisneraprilrisner4595 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I could go into great scientific detail about my take on the subject. And not sudosciece.
    But to keep it short.: B.S.

    • @EyeonthePrize247
      @EyeonthePrize247 ปีที่แล้ว

      LMFAO, you mean “pseudoscience?” I’m so sure you can go into “great scientific detail” when you can’t even spell, lol.

  • @xchopp
    @xchopp 2 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Let's not fail to remember just how awful the WSJ and its editors have been on this issue -- and contributors such as George Will: WHERE IS THE ACCOUNTABILITY for the spreading of such lies?

    • @jimmyf9545
      @jimmyf9545 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Totally agree.

  • @CaptainRedbeard.
    @CaptainRedbeard. 2 ปีที่แล้ว +166

    Thank you Frontline for consistently great investigative journalism!

    • @thatguybrooke
      @thatguybrooke ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Ohh, They sure do know how to Dramatize a "crisis". It's Definitely not about making Money 💰 money money! They've been blowing this horn for almost 50yrs.. but sure I guess we're down to 9yrs or something huh? 🙄
      I feel sooo bad for all those banks w 30yr. mortgages on these beach front properties...that'll apparently be ruined 😢...🙃😅🤣
      *If you believe that?.. I've got a bridge to sell you my friend.

    • @lilblackduc7312
      @lilblackduc7312 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Nazis foretold government-subsidized media PBS = "Think of the press as a great keyboard on which the government can play". -Joseph Goebbels

    • @SixHundredandThirteen
      @SixHundredandThirteen ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@lilblackduc7312 the government has a hand on everything, all media Hollywood etc. Pretty much all subjects of life

    • @michaelschneider-
      @michaelschneider- ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @CaptainRedbeard. +1.. Agreed. A Big Ole Thank You to the entire Frontline staff..

    • @jefft5152
      @jefft5152 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      ​@@lilblackduc7312 15% of funding is in no way a deciding factor. Can you say the same of Faux's controlling interest?

  • @angelarch5352
    @angelarch5352 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you for this important video. Amen, Namaste, Stay safe.

  • @o0o-jd-o0o95
    @o0o-jd-o0o95 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    They did the same thing when the investigation of lead and leaded gasoline came about

  • @Dangic23
    @Dangic23 2 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    The documentary
    “How Big Oil Conquered the World “
    Is a MUST see

    • @poppystars9005
      @poppystars9005 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Or how big oil populated the world…

    • @Dangic23
      @Dangic23 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@poppystars9005
      Nope.
      Documentary explains.
      With 100% verifiable references.

    • @jakebredthauer5100
      @jakebredthauer5100 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Dangic23
      Are you denying that a
      high population is dependent
      on high energy use?

    • @Dangic23
      @Dangic23 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@jakebredthauer5100
      No.
      Not related to my post.

    • @jakebredthauer5100
      @jakebredthauer5100 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Dangic23 I suppose that documentary is from Front-line and Frontline is making a case for stronger, more powerful, larger government to cut off energy to cut off the world population.

  • @MikaelChoi
    @MikaelChoi 2 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    Long Live PBS Frontline!

    • @cyrusdubash3097
      @cyrusdubash3097 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That would prove this program wrong.

  • @JonnoPlays
    @JonnoPlays ปีที่แล้ว +2

    "I'm clearly on the wrong side of history"
    He says from the kitchen table of his million dollar house. Yeah he feels real bad I'm sure.

  • @lancemarshall241
    @lancemarshall241 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Why didn't Exxon continue to fund research into alternative energy sources? As long as money is being made does it matter how the energy is produced?

  • @kenlodge3399
    @kenlodge3399 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    I'll say it was in the 90s when I first heard about climate change, but wasn't until closer to 2000 when began to really appreciate how serious its implications are. So I really don't need to say anymore as that is the result of all the major players efforts to convince me whether it is a relevant concern or not. In fact I'll insist mine is a typical response to global warming, that how I know of it is almost entirely as a point of conflict, more political than anything scientific. Mostly cliche by now, but as this report points out is the validity of misinformation. By the actions of a certain President who promoted war in the early 2000s, he elevated for an entire generation the practice of misinformation as a legitimate method of discourse and debate. Now since that time how many Hot Button issues have arisen on a national level which have continued to validate and enhance the benefits of misinformation. To the point, Denial of Responsibility, on a national level, is becoming a more and more accepted practice to achieve political outcomes.

  • @nottroy4500
    @nottroy4500 2 ปีที่แล้ว +60

    Frontline is the best journo doc series we have right now. Always nuanced and well-researched, backed up by interviews with experts and the people in power. Thankful for them.

    • @davidanalyst671
      @davidanalyst671 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Experts like al gore, who said the world only had 10 years left... 17 years ago

    • @lilblackduc7312
      @lilblackduc7312 ปีที่แล้ว

      ..Nazis foretold government-subsidized media PBS = "Think of the press as a great keyboard on which the government can play". -Joseph Goebbels

    • @nikkiwroten2296
      @nikkiwroten2296 ปีที่แล้ว

      PROPAGANDA journo doc series

    • @nottroy4500
      @nottroy4500 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@nikkiwroten2296 Interesting take, Nikki. What are a few examples of what you consider to be honest journalism?

    • @TheMightySynchromess
      @TheMightySynchromess 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      And totally biased.

  • @oslowcloud
    @oslowcloud ปีที่แล้ว

    YES Frontline this is good stuff!

  • @hjohnston3534
    @hjohnston3534 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I just had a one-sided conversation with my sister about this. I told her that big oil KNEW the effects of fossil fuels on the environment in the 70's and suppressed it. She just rolled her eyes because Tucker Carlson hasn't told her that it is real. Sadly, she is too far right to see the light.

    • @johnnysupreme5718
      @johnnysupreme5718 ปีที่แล้ว

      The same people saying the world would end in a decade 50 years ago are still going at it today with the same bullshit.
      You can look at a picture of the Statue of Liberty today and one from when it was first built and see that man-made Climate Change is pure nonsense.
      The politicians who demand you freak out about Climate Change all live on beachfront property and fly massively polluting jets across the world all day for fun. The oil companies are terrible, corrupt and pollute way too much, but Climate Change alarmism is still bullshit.

    • @kiwitrainguy
      @kiwitrainguy 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      "Too far right to see the light" - that's good, mind if I use it?

  • @craigplank7432
    @craigplank7432 2 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    I don't know which was more chilling, this or the Putin episode. This is excellent!

  • @MeAndDad_1723
    @MeAndDad_1723 2 ปีที่แล้ว +50

    Corporates who fund congressional pockets own it all. Including laws, policies and regulations. The right ideas never has more money then the wrong ideas; Sovereign Economics.

    • @rcpilot179
      @rcpilot179 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      And the Corp gives across the board. Red or blue, our government isn't shy about taking gifts.

    • @lynnjudd9036
      @lynnjudd9036 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Ralph Nader would have loved this comment when he wrote "Who Runs Congress?"

    • @davidalvarez7262
      @davidalvarez7262 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Regulatory capture is no joke. We got the oil companies chasing next months profits tells you its a systemic issue.

    • @Pug_Mom11
      @Pug_Mom11 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Citizens United made it possible for these corporations to funnel massive amounts of cash into our politics

    • @AdamWestish
      @AdamWestish 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Oil companies are making trillions destroying the earth. They should pay the costs of conversion, not consumers. That they're also the ones making it impossible to switch to solar, etc, also makes it _necessary_ that they foot the costs. Or alternatively they could just face the firing squads and the money to do so is taken by force.

  • @archbishopcorrinesheemaame2574
    @archbishopcorrinesheemaame2574 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    THANK YOU...FRONTLINE...

  • @orhanmekic9292
    @orhanmekic9292 ปีที่แล้ว

    So sad and heartbreaking.

  • @jimparsons9454
    @jimparsons9454 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Remember folks these companies don't give two shits about you or your families, community, etc.

  • @jimyoung648
    @jimyoung648 2 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    I wish they had included a bit on the dispute between Roger Revelle and S. Fred Singer shortly before Revelle passed away. To me, Revelle was near the end of the 10 to 15 year period he thought was necessary to determine if the trend was going to become a problem that needed serious action. I only learned of Revelle's role in climate science and oceanography years after I had provided some very minor DMSP weather Satellite support to the Office of Naval Research that he had been so instrumental in during WWII, his later leadership in the International Geophysical Year (1957 and 58), work at Scripps Institute and role in starting UCSD. Justin Lancaster raised the details of what I believe was Singer's misuse of Revelle's inputs to his book but had been stopped by a SLAPP suit (Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation) at the critical time (so much for important free speech being able to be heard). To me Singer seemed to use Revelle's wanting to use a 10 to 15 year period of further operation as if it was just starting, not just ending.

  • @jacobreuter
    @jacobreuter หลายเดือนก่อน

    The bass drop at :30 is lit

  • @sherriianiro747
    @sherriianiro747 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I have a question - decades ago when the government lowered the boom and created the EPA and the Clean Water Act companies never threatened price increases as they do now because it wasn't a monopoly then like today. Where did the ant-trust laws go to ensure free enterprise?
    They were created from public demand during the Gilded Age but you never hear about enforcement anymore.

  • @RAZR_Channel
    @RAZR_Channel 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    So predictable that people get spooked by "it's going to cost jobs"... when the real consequence is : "it's going to cost lives"...

  • @suyashyadav7827
    @suyashyadav7827 2 ปีที่แล้ว +36

    documentaries like these should be made to run 24hrs on national tv. moreover all senators and congressman assets and their lobby background should be disclosed

    • @HateTheIRS
      @HateTheIRS 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Climate change does not cause wildfires that’s false

    • @jakebredthauer5100
      @jakebredthauer5100 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      That is not freedom of speech to force people to fund speech they do not agree with.

    • @juliehenderson1672
      @juliehenderson1672 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      These documentaries should be standard curriculum in high schools. Many students don't learn truth until grad school.

    • @JW-pb8fg
      @JW-pb8fg 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      YEH! ALONG WITH NAZI GERMANY DOCUMENTARIES! BOTH ARE FILLED WITH DESPICABLE LIES AND PRETEND HORROR STORIES! HA HA HA! DO YOU REALLY BELIEVE THIS CRAP?

  • @manuelpopp1687
    @manuelpopp1687 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Funny how they empathize uncertainties when it comes to the climate but not when talking about the economy.

  • @gruntslayer3524
    @gruntslayer3524 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Imagine the greed of a handful of individuals dooming the entire planet. What a wonderful system capitalism is

  • @grumpy7678
    @grumpy7678 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    At 111 minutes I listened to ex Senator Hagel whine that he "was not a scientist" but that it seemed to him that the evidence was unclear. Of course it was unclear ... he attended numerous meetings with those opposing the Kyoto Conference draft resolutions, meetings that included the Exxon CEO. They fed him the industry line and even provided drafts of the upcoming Byrd-Hagel resolution (that when passed killed any possibility of meaningful US involvement in any global effort to mitigate climate change).
    To me, after a congressperson says "I am not a scientist, but..." the next statement should be "here is what the National Academy of Sciences has stated several times about global warming, its causes, and the predicted effects".
    The National Academy of Sciences was created (in 1863) to provide technical and scientific guidance to Congress. They had by the mid 90s issued several reports on climate change and its causes, including the famous 1979 Charney Report, showing the scientific consensus on the human cause of adverse climate change.
    Every congressperson then and now should rely heavily on the NAS reports, and not on the latest unpublished negative assessment "just released" by the oil industry led forces against doing anything.
    My two cents ...

    • @pjpredhomme7699
      @pjpredhomme7699 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      He was given bags of cash that told him made the science real clear - these guys knew . When Jr Bush was president and they were going thru government reports - and crossing out findings all thru them - he couldn't figure out what that meant . He knows what he did - no clue why he agreed to go on camera - maybe he thought he would not look as bad as he did - narcissism will make people do funny things

  • @V.E.D.A.N.G
    @V.E.D.A.N.G 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I loved the voice who' describes what all happened over all the years and basically sums it up

  • @marissadower-morgan3313
    @marissadower-morgan3313 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I am ashamed of this beautiful and intelligent country .who has always had the ability to change and grow new forms of energy . There is no excuse for this .Greed is obviously the cancer in this society .

  • @Omid-on-Life
    @Omid-on-Life 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Great report!! Thank you!

  • @emiliorosa9896
    @emiliorosa9896 2 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Thanks you Frontline for amazing work and information

  • @wmurch3
    @wmurch3 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Another fantastic expose from Frontline. Nobody does it better...nobody. Can't wait until part 2!

  • @douglasharbert3340
    @douglasharbert3340 ปีที่แล้ว

    Every single one of you watching this documentary enables them. If you want to save the environment, then stop driving your vehicles, heating your homes, and using any plastic or electronic devices. No? I didn't think so ..

  • @deborahterrell4679
    @deborahterrell4679 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    It's upsetting to know that if just incremental changes had begun in the 80s we would be better off now. Greed is always the culprit